Chrome For Mobile Will Not Be Supporting Extensions Anytime Soon

chrome_extensionsExtensions on Google’s Chrome browser for the desktop are pretty handy. Some are pretty novel but there are some with use to others, like an extension to help the color-blind, or an extension to block ads, or an extension to help remember your passwords and sync it across your devices.

All of this sounds pretty good and we’re sure that many users would love to see these extensions brought over onto mobile. Unfortunately it does not seem like that will be happening anytime soon. This is according to a recent Reddit AMA (via 9to5Google) in which the Chrome for Android team answered some questions, one of them being whether or not extensions would be supported on mobile devices.

According to the response given, it seems that by adding extensions onto mobile, it can interfere with the user experience which is why they have avoided doing so. “There are no plans to add extensions support on mobile. We haven’t been able to implement these on mobile and still have it be a good user experience.”

Google did not detail as to how exactly extensions would affect the user experience, but perhaps it could be a performance issue, or as some speculate, extensions such as AdBlock would interfere with how Google serves ads which might be why they are unwilling to support extensions to this day.

Chrome For Mobile Will Not Be Supporting Extensions Anytime Soon , original content from Ubergizmo. Read our Copyrights and terms of use.



Volkswagen Golf GTE Concept Features Gullwing Doors

golf gte concept 4The Volkswagen Golf is probably one of the more recognizable cars in the market, and its GTI model is a pretty decent sports car that won’t necessarily break the bank. However if you thought that the design of the Golf could do with some changes, you will be pleased to learn that Volkswagen is thinking that too.

The carmaker has recently unveiled a Golf concept which you can see in the images above and below where it looks like it has been given a rather drastic makeover. This particular model is the Golf GTE Sport which the company showed off at the annual Volkswagen-Audi event in Austria and as the pictures show, it’s a pretty radical departure from the original design of the Golf.

In this particular concept, gone are the soft curves. They are instead replaced with sharp lines and angles, making the car look a lot more fierce and sporty if you will. The biggest change is probably the introduction of the gullwing doors which is admittedly a rather nice touch. The interior has also been given a makeover where it looks a lot more futuristic, like what we imagine what cars would look like in Tron, if they had cars.

According to Volkswagen, they are boasting that the Golf GTE Sport will come with 395 horsepower thanks to a hybrid drivetrain that can travel 31 miles on its electric drive alone. They are also boasting a time of 4.3 seconds to reach 62mph and can achieve a top speed of 174. Of course this is a concept and there’s no telling if Volkswagen will really apply this styling to future GTE models, but boy does it look pretty.

Volkswagen Golf GTE Concept Features Gullwing Doors , original content from Ubergizmo. Read our Copyrights and terms of use.



NTSB Reveals Amtrak Train Sped Up Seconds Before Deadly Crash In Philadelphia

The National Transportation and Safety Board revealed Thursday that the Amtrak train that derailed in Philadelphia Tuesday night was accelerating seconds before it entered a sharp turn and crashed. Eight passengers have been confirmed dead, and more than 200 were injured.

Robert Sumwalt of the NTSB said his team was building a timeline of what happened leading up to the crash based on video footage that cut out seconds before the crash. At 43 seconds before the end of the video, the train’s speed exceeded 80 miles per hour, Sumwalt said. Thirty-one seconds before the end, the train was going over 90 miles per hour, and 16 seconds before the crash, the train was going over 100 miles per hour.

The NTSB also said the train’s engineer, Bradon Bostian, applied emergency breaks seconds before the crash.

While braking technology known as Positive Train Control is designed to prevent derailments due to overspeeding, Amtrak trains along the Northeast coordinator are not equipped with them. “I can confidently say PTC would have prevented this accident,” Sumwalt said. Automatic speed-control features were supposed to be installed in the trains in the coming months.

What is still unknown is why the train was speeding in the first place. Was it was manually caused by the engineer, who is expected to note speed restrictions on the route, or was another factor at play?

amtrak philadelphia
Emergency personnel work the scene of a deadly train wreck in Philadelphia. (AP Photo/ Joseph Kaczmarek)

Bostian has agreed to be interviewed by the NTSB, but said he can’t recall what happened the moments before the crash.

An attorney for the 32-year-old engineer told “Good Morning America” Bostian “has absolutely no recollection whatsoever” after losing consciousness in the Tuesday night crash, and noted that his client has no known medical issues.

“He remembers driving the train,” attorney Robert Goggin said. “He remembers going to that area generally, [but] has absolutely no recollection of the incident or anything unusual. He recalls — the next thing he recalls is being thrown around, coming to, finding his bag, getting his cell phone and dialing 911.”

The NTSB will interview the engineer and passengers to get a more complete picture of what happened. Additionally, they will examine inspection records for the train and speak with the train’s manager and dispatcher.

amtrak philadelphia
In this aerial photo, emergency personnel work at the scene of a deadly train wreck Wednesday in Philadelphia. (AP Photo/Patrick Semansky)

Philadelphia Police Chief Inspector Joseph Sullivan also announced his agency is working with the city’s district attorney, Seth Williams, in a separate “ongoing active criminal investigation.”

On Thursday, an Amtrak employee filed the first lawsuit in connection to the derailment, NBC Philadelphia reports.

Amtrak employee Bruce Phillips was “violently hurled” inside the railcar, and his body was struck several times before he slammed onto the floor, according to the lawsuit. Philips remains hospitalized.

Phillips and his wife are seeking significant damages, including “in excess of $150,000” in punitive damages for Amtrak’s alleged “gross reckless conduct.”

In a statement released Thursday, Amtrak President and CEO Joe Boardman said, “Amtrak takes full responsibility and deeply apologizes for our role in this tragic event.”

The eight victims have all been identified, and include a U.S. Naval Academy midshipman, a software architect for the Associated Press, a Wells Fargo executive and a young CEO of a small tech company, CNN reports.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

A Marriage Vow to Remember

2015-05-14-1431629658-1992341-bigstockWeddingMarch2428703.jpg

When I got married in 2012, my wife and I wrote our own vows. It is the vogue thing to do these days. What I soon learned is that the writing of one’s vows can be intimidating and extremely personal. However, the beauty of having a formal wedding is often tied to the very vows that are exchanged between the couple. Especially, when those vows are personally written by the couple. The vows express a lot about the relationship, sometimes reflecting from the beginning of the relationship to what they hope for in the future. Unlike traditional scripted vows, personally written vows provide a look into the relationship, and each person’s perspective on marriage.

As we enter into the traditional summer wedding season in the United States, I wanted to share the vows that I wrote and think about how I can continue to remember those words in my everyday life. The vows that I wrote projected the love that I felt and continue to have for my wife. They captured a desire to make her as special each day as she was on our wedding day. While I can’t say that this happens everyday in the way that I would have dreamed, it is a constant reminder of where I want to be and how I want to feel in our marriage. This is what I said:

“On this day, in the presence of God with friends and family as our witnesses, I take thee to have and to hold, to honor and to cherish, to argue (amicably) and to love, to maintain and to grow our relationship through its ups and downs. My heart shall seek no other. I give myself to you with the most holy of intentions. The love that I feel this day shall always remain. Nothing shall come between us; be it any person, place or thing. I promise to be your friend and family, lover and love, your biggest fan and truest confidant, and both a leader and a follower with the mindset to know the difference. I give unto you all that is me, not for all of you, but simply for you to have all of me. I promise to never stop learning about you and giving you my all. I will find interest in most of your interests, as well as pain in your pain. I will give to you comfort, happiness, empathy, sympathy, honor, pleasure, pride, peace and most of all unending undeniable enduring love. At this moment, I am yours forever more. I am your husband, today and always until death do us part.”

As romantic as the words can be, the real romance starts when you live out the words that you have so profoundly announced. It is easy to allow your day-to-day obligations to interfere with your relationship, but the key is remembering and living out those words that set the stage for your marriage. What you have set out to do in writing your vows is to establish a baseline and foundation for the person that you “wish” to be for your husband or wife. The goal is not to simply say these words, on this day, but to live these words as much as possible. While you will have your ups and downs, your vows can bring you back to the essence of what you want in your marriage.

The vows that I wrote are indicative of the realities that I have experienced in being married. There are ups and downs, differences and challenges, but there’s also a deeply seeded love. A love that continues to grow and develop due to our understanding of what those vows meant not just on that day, but as we go forward each day of our lives together. I love being married to my wife, and when I read my vows I am reminded of the romance that we shared on that day.

I’m also informed of the romance that we can have in the future for as long as we live out these words. As vows are exchanged this summer, I hope that whatever words have been exchanged came from the heart and they should not be just a representation of the past, but those words should be a catalyst for always keeping your love alive. Don’t just exchange your vows, but vow to remember and live them.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

12 Things Couples Still Won't Do In Front Of Each Other (Even After Years Together)

One of the best parts about being in a long-term relationship is getting to that point where you feel totally comfortable around each other. That said, there are some lines that shouldn’t be crossed, no matter how long you’ve been together.

Below are 12 habits that, in the interest of romance and privacy, are best kept on the D.L.

1. Going to the bathroom. Peeing is fine. Pooping? Not so much.

Embedded via Giphy

2. And while we’re on the subject, the same goes for farting.

3. Plucking ingrown hairs of the pubic variety.

4. Or bleaching/waxing any area where the sun don’t shine.

5. Putting on Spanx. It’s not a graceful process, OK?

Embedded via Giphy

6. Examining blackheads or popping pimples in a magnified mirror.

7. For the ladies, removing your ‘stache and/or stubborn chin hairs.

8. For the gents, scratching your balls.

9. Taking out your Invisalign. Because spit. Spit everywhere.

Embedded via Giphy

10. Inserting or removing a tampon.

11. Stepping on the scale. Ain’t nobody need to see that number but you.

12. Picking your nose. Actually it’s best not to do this at all, unless it’s with a tissue. In private.

.articleBody div.feature-section, .entry div.feature-section{width:55%;margin-left:auto;margin-right:auto;} .articleBody span.feature-dropcap, .entry span.feature-dropcap{float:left;font-size:72px;line-height:59px;padding-top:4px;padding-right:8px;padding-left:3px;} div.feature-caption{font-size:90%;margin-top:0px;}

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Immigration Hardliners Prevail In Fight Over Dreamers And The Military

WASHINGTON — Asking the Department of Defense to consider allowing young undocumented immigrants to enlist proved a bridge too far Thursday in the Republican-led House of Representatives.

Members voted 221 to 202 to strip a measure from the National Defense Authorization Act that asks the secretary of defense to review policies on whether certain undocumented young people, often called Dreamers, can join the military if they have work authorization.

Republicans gave a variety of reasons for opposing the Dreamer provision, offered by Rep. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.). Some critics, including Armed Services Committee Chairman Mac Thornberry (R-Texas), said the measure was inappropriate in the NDAA, and should be discussed elsewhere.

But the opposition went deeper than just when and where military service for undocumented immigrants should be debated.

Many Republican opponents said keeping the measure in the defense authorization act would be tacit endorsement of President Barack Obama’s 2012 Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals policy, or DACA. That policy has granted temporary work permits to hundreds of thousands of Dreamers.

House Republicans have voted multiple times to end DACA, and some members argued on the House floor that it would be hypocritical to allow Gallego’s measure to remain in the NDAA.

Democrats and some Republicans argued that work authorization should also allow DACA recipients to enlist in the military. Gallego’s provision, however, only asks the Defense Department to consider a policy change.

“All this bill is saying is that the available pool [for recruiting] may also be Dreamers,” Gallego told reporters at a press conference earlier Thursday, rejecting claims that he was pushing for “amnesty.” “But there is no teeth to this.”

Rep. Mo Brooks (R-Ala.) introduced the amendment striking the DACA-related provision. He sent a letter Thursday to colleagues urging them to vote for his amendment, framing it as a jobs issue because the military is currently downsizing.

“Each time an illegal alien takes an enlistment opportunity, an American or lawful immigrant loses an enlistment opportunity,” Brooks wrote. “The ratio is one-to-one. Period. That is the math.”

Brooks said Gallego offered his amendment to the House Armed Services Committee in the “early-morning, sleep-deprived portion” of its markup of the NDAA, and six “wayward Republicans” voted in favor. Gallego said it was “patently false” that the GOP committee members didn’t know what they were doing.

Not all Republicans supported Brooks’ amendment to strip the Gallego provision. CQ Roll Call reported that Reps. Jeff Denham (R-Calif.), Mike Coffman (R-Colo.) and Adam Kinzinger (R-Ill.) circulated a letter urging fellow GOP members to oppose Brooks’ amendment. In the end, 20 Republicans voted against it.

Before the vote, Rep. Jaime Herrera Beutler (R-Wash.) took to the House floor to voice her opposition. She said allowing Dreamers to serve wouldn’t be “amnesty,” and praised those with “the courage and conviction” to enlist.

“If someone through their merit and their hard work earns acceptance into that elite fighting force, where they could die defending you and me, then I leave you with this question: What country’s flag would you have draped on the casket of that brave soul?” Beutler said.

To Democrats, the fact that most Republicans voted to gut the provision presented another opportunity to hammer the GOP for voting against bills that would help Dreamers. House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said at the press conference with Gallego before the vote that the controversy “is yet another example of anti-immigrant attitude on the part of the House Republicans.”

After the vote, Gallego issued a statement expressing his disappointment.

“There was no reason to have this fight; this amendment should not have been controversial,” he said. “But Mr. Brooks and his band of extreme, anti-immigrant Republicans put their extreme politics ahead of the best interest of our military and our country.”

Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s campaign got involved as well, issuing a statement that she believes Dreamers who want to serve “should be honored and celebrated, not discriminated against.”

Dreamers aren’t going to give up, said Cesar Vargas, a co-director of the advocacy group Dream Action Coalition and a would-be military service member.

“We are urging the President to step in as this is unnecessary legislative drama; President Obama already has statutory authority to allow Dreamers into the military,” Vargas said in a statement. “Dreamers, like myself, will not stop until we have our commitment to serve the country we call home acknowledged.”

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Pitch Perfect 2: An Off-Tune Paean to Feminism and Flatulence

2015-05-14-1431610212-5368044-PitchPerfect2photo.JPG

Good news for Comingsoon.net’s Joshua Starnes. He can recycle his critique of Pitch Perfect (2012) for its sequel: “Pitch Perfect isn’t particularly bad. It isn’t particularly anything. And that’s what’s most disappointing about it.”

The low-costing original Pitch took in $113,042,075 worldwide on a production budget of $17 million, which deemed it the second highest grossing comedy/musical since 1984, losing the top spot only to School of Rock (2003). No wonder there is a follow-up.

The semi-sad result is that although Pitch 2 is mostly painless, with several fine musical numbers, especially Snoop Dogg’s Christmas duet with Anna Kendrick’s Beta, the dialogue voiced between the often agreeable a cappella chorals seldom rises above the lame. “I’d like to be the brisket in that man sandwich” is possibly passable. “The air we’re breathing now is 90% fart” isn’t. “Fart” also appears as a password to get into a party of sorts, but it must be accompanied by a fart sound. Blame screenwriter Kay Cannon, whose efforts for 30 Rock were on a whole other level. She also wrote for Saturday Night Live, but since half of the skits of almost every segment of that program misfire, one know not whether to praise or demean her efforts there.

2015-05-14-1431610323-7324332-PitchPerfectPhoto2.JPG(L to R) Ashley (SHELLEY REGNER), Lilly (HANA MAE LEE), Chloe (BRITTANY SNOW), Stacie (ALEXIS KNAPP), Beca (ANNA KENDRICK), Flo (CHRISSIE FIT), Fat Amy (REBEL WILSON) and Jessica (KELLEY ALICE JAKLE) worry for the future of the Barden Bellas.

The film begins with the award-winning group, the Barden Bellas, performing in Washington, D.C., for the President and the First Lady. Yes, Michelle and mate make actual cameos. Near the end of the all-girls’ routine, which was going rather fine, the hefty Fat Amy (Rebel Wilson) is lowered from the ceiling as she sings Miley Cyrus’s “Wrecking Ball.” Suddenly, Amy’s tights rip. Oh, no! She’s not wearing undies. Her privates exposed midair cause the Obamas to frown, then quickly go viral, and suddenly Amy’s the proud possessor of the world’s most famous vagina.

This debacle causes the whole group to lose their standing, not only on the a cappella circuit but also on campus. Clearly, the only way to regain their aura of success is by winning the World Championships being held in Copenhagen.

There is little drama along the way since you can already guess the ending unless you’ve never been to a film before. But what’s baffling here for a film directed by a woman, Elizabeth Banks, and written by a woman (Cannon), is that each female character is reduced to a single stereotype. The Asian girl speaks very quietly. The black, semi-butch lesbian can hardly control her sexual urges. As for the Guatemalan lass, she sees her future as being deported after she graduates and then drowning when she tries to smuggle herself back on a boat. Told in a deadpan manner, this is supposed to be very funny. Tell that to the relatives of all the thousands of folks who have died recently in just such a manner. Additionally, Rebel Wilson’s Fat Amy’s humor stems completely from her being overweight and buffoonish. I doubt making the obese girl the class clown is really the way to breakdown body biases.

2015-05-14-1431610441-7631000-PitchPerfectphoto3.JPG(L to R) Players from the Green Bay Packers–JORDAN RODGERS, T.J. LANG, CLAY MATTHEWS, DON BARCLAY, DAVID BAKHTIARI and JOSH SITTON–compete against the Barden Bellas as Tommy (DAVID CROSS, foreground) cheers them on.

Worse, the two broadcasters portrayed by Banks (Gail) and John Michael Higgins (John) spout 1950’s intolerant commentary nonstop during every a cappella contest. Their “jokes” are racist, misanthropic, plain cruel, but mostly wonkish. An example, after a mishap, John opines: “This is what happens when you send girls to college.” Clearly, Cannon desires to show the ridiculousness of being an anti-feminist. However, her targets often seem dated, and her one-liners frequently are barely groaners.

On the plus side, several of the female characters are bright, all are talented, and their body parts aren’t fetishized. Still, seldom does the singing, the choreography, or the plot even come close to a prime episode of Glee.

Yet if you are a young woman, possibly in the age bracket of 12 to 16, you might just have a grand old time with these festivities. There are laughs, catchy tunes, and Anna Kendrick. Avengers: Age of Ultron can’t boast that.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Beautiful photo shows white dwarf stars moving away from a star cluster

Like a celestial Rorschach test, I can see so many things when I stare at this wonderful photo captured by the Hubble Space Telescope. It’s like static on a TV. Or like a crowded future city lit by buildings stacked on buildings. But what it really is is even cooler: it’s the first time pictures have been taken of white dwarf stars migrating from the center of a star cluster to the outskirts.

Read more…


What the Hell Is the "Oh-My-God" Particle?

The Fly’s Eye was a crude cosmic ray detector perched on top a Utah mountain in the early 80s and 90s. It’s long obsolete now, but it’ll always have a place in astronomy history: On October, 15 1991, it detected something called the Oh-My-God particle, a cosmic ray going faster than astronomers thought possible.

Read more…




GTA 5 “Angry Planes” mod and more tipped as viruses

If you’re a Grand Theft Auto 5 fan who plays on the PC, you better think twice before you download mods…even if they’re popular and widely known. Reports from upset users are stating that some of the most popular GTA 5 mods are installing malware of various sorts on users computers, including keyloggers and other programs. The “Angry Planes” mod … Continue reading