TCL rolls out premium Roku TV models

tcl-roku-tvIf there is one TV company that is growing fast in terms of branding over in the US, it would be TCL. In fact, TCL has just announced not one, not two or even three, but seven spanking new TCL Roku TVs that are set to hit store shelves some time later this month, over in brick and mortar stores as well as through online channels at major retailers nationwide. TCL is set to expand their 2015 TCL Roku TV lineup with a trio of 3800 Design Series models and a quartet of top-of-the-line 3850 Decorator Series models. This would mean that consumers are able to have a greater number of choices when it comes to hunting down a smart TV in order to meet their needs as well as placing TCL Roku TV in a prime position to be one of the leading smart TV experiences available at the moment.

All TCL Roku TV models, and this would include the 3800 and 3850 series, would have picked up the Netflix Recommended TV designation which points to the models delivering easy access to Internet TV services, faster performance, and new features that pave the way for a next-generation smart TV experience.

TCL Roku TVs will also boast of a personalized home screen, complete with access to all entertainment sources, so that it is a snap to navigate between gaming consoles, cable or satellite box. You will also be spoilt for choice since there are more than 2,000 streaming channels that include Sling TV and WatchESPN. Sling TV happens to be an Internet TV service which offers both domestic and international live and on demand programming from top sports, lifestyle, family and news networks such as ESPN, AMC, TNT, and Food Network, among others.

The TCL Roku TV 3800 Series will arrive in 32”, 40” and 50” models, retailing for $229, $339 and $479, respectively. For those who would want to settle for the high end TCL Roku TV 3850 Series, you can choose from the 32”, 40”, 50” and 55” models for $249, $359, $529 and $699, respectively.

Press Release
[ TCL rolls out premium Roku TV models copyright by Coolest Gadgets ]

How To Boot In Android Recovery Mode

All Android phones come with built-in recovery mode that is separate from the original operating system. The recovery mode is used to access different features of the phone without accessing the phone’s OS. The main function of the recovery mode is to fix the phone while staying away from the faulty OS of the phone.

If you own an Android phone, then it is very important for you to learn how to access this mode and how to utilize it. The process to access this mode depends on the manufacturer of your device and the model of your device. The options available in the Recovery mode may also vary, however, the basic concept is same for all Android phones.

In this tutorial, we are going to show you how you can access this mode on most Android phones and how you can use the available options to fix your phone.

Note: In recovery mode, the phone’s touch screen will not work, you will have to use the hardware buttons to navigate. To move between options, press Volume up and down button to move up and down respectively. You can press the Power button to select any of the options.

How To Access Android Recovery Mode

As we said, the basic concept is same, all you need to do is turn off the phone and turn it on by pressing specific keys (depending on the phone). On some phones you will enter Recovery mode directly and on others you may need to navigate through the different options to access Recovery mode.

Samsung Galaxy Series

  1. Turn off the phone (hold power button and select “Power Off” from the menu)
  2. Now, press and hold Power+Home+Volume Up buttons..
  3. Keep holding until device logo shows up and phone restarts again, you should enter recovery mode.

If you see a menu instead, then navigate (like mentioned above ) to “Recovery mode” option and press power button to enter.

Nexus Series

  1. Turn off the phone
  2. Press and hold Power+Volume Up+Volume Down buttons.
  3. Keep holding until you see a menu with Recovery mode option.
  4. Navigate to Recovery mode option and press Power button.

LG G Series

  1. Turn off the phone
  2. Press and hold Power+Volume down key until you see LG logo, and the menu to enter your phone recovery mode will show up.
  3. Just Navigate to Recovery mode option and press Power button.

HTC one Series

  1. First disable Fastboot by going to Settings > Battery and disabling Fastboot.
  2. Turn off the phone
  3. Press and Hold Power+Volume down key until you see a menu where you can navigate to “Recovery mode” and enter with Power button.

Motorola Droid Series

  1. Turn off the phone
  2. Press and hold Power+Home buttons.
  3. The phone will turn on and menu to enter recovery mode will show up.
  4. Navigate to “Recovery mode” option and press Power Button.

If your phone or manufacturer is not mentioned above, then try all of the methods mentioned above and one of them should work. If nothing works, then it is better to contact your manufacturer or check out your Phone’s official support page to see if you could get the key combination.

Recovery Mode Available options

The options available in recovery mode are different from manufacturer to manufacturer, however, there are some options that are common in all phones.

android recovery

reboot system now

This is a plain reboot, which will restart your phone normally.

apply update from ADB

Using Android Debug Bridge (ADB) you can connect your phone to PC and provide commands right from your PC. This feature is mostly used by developers to fix bugs in applications.

wipe data/factory reset

Factory reset is the last resort for most android issues, you can just factory reset your phone and start over. However, this will also delete all your data, so make sure your phone data is backed up. This option is available from phone settings as well, but if you are locked out or can’t access the OS, then you can also reset from “Recovery mode”.

wipe cache partition

Wipe cache partition is not same as Application cache and cannot be deleted the same way. These are temporary files used in application installation mostly, no personal data is deleted along with them. However, they can sometime make the phone not work properly, so you can wipe them from “Recovery mode”.

If there are any questions or you need help with finding the key combination for your specific device, let us know in the comments, we might be able to help.

How To Boot In Android Recovery Mode , original content from Ubergizmo. Read our Copyrights and terms of use.



Melissa Rivers On #AskHerMore: ‘No One Wants To Discuss Massive Policies On The Red Carpet'

Melissa Rivers doesn’t find celebrity interviewers’ proclivity to ask about red carpet fashions to be an offensive practice, she explained in a HuffPost Live interview on Wednesday.

“This whole thing ‘Ask Me More’ — I get it, but let’s keep it in perspective,” she told host Caitlyn Becker, referring to #AskHerMore, a Twitter campaign started around the 2014 Emmys in hopes of increasing the volume of non-sartorial questions directed toward female celebs.

The “Fashion Police” executive producer and The Book of Joan: Tales of Mirth, Mischief and Manipulation author elaborated:

So you’re getting $30-40,000 dresses for free. You’re supposed to say the designer’s name. But, if you want to go out and buy your dress, and not have to worry about anyone asking you about it, and not having to promote anyone, fine! Let’s talk about something else! … But no one really wants to discuss massive policies on the red carpet … And you say, ask me about more than just my dress, okay: Did you pay for it?

It’s not that Rivers is opposed to starlets talking about topics other than fashion on the red carpet; rather, she just doesn’t think conversation about style should be stigmatized.

“If there’s something interesting going on or you want to get out a message — absolutely,” she said. “But let’s not carry it so far that it’s an insult to ask who you’re wearing.”

Watch more from Melissa Rivers’ conversation with HuffPost Live.

Sign up for Live Today, HuffPost Live’s morning email that will let you know the newsmakers, celebrities and politicians joining us that day and give you the best clips from the day before!

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Baby, We Were Born This Way

This is a pretty controversial subject and I am not really a controversial person. Just ask my husband. If you see things my way, I will have no problem with your opinions.

Since becoming a mother, I have learned that all I really care about is that my kids are happy. And healthy. I can only do so much in the healthy department. But, at this stage of this game called life, I pretty much control their happiness. And when I say I, I mean we.

When it comes to what my kids want to wear in the morning, I have learned that I really don’t give a rats ass what they wear. And I don’t give an even bigger rats ass what people think about what my kids wear.

This is the way my parents raised me. I wanted so desperately to be a man when I was a little girl. And my parents let me live my dream. Until I hit puberty, I thought I was a boy. It was a very rude awakening when I found out I wasn’t, but I got over it and made the transformation into a woman rather seamlessly.

I was the ultimate tomboy. I liked sports. I liked to dress as a boy. I liked to remove my shirt and play on the skins team. And for some God-forsaken reason, my parents allowed me to cut my hair like a boy. I can vividly remember getting my haircut and asking to have it look just like Nicholas Bradford from Eight is Enough. Looking at pics of him, I think he was the one trying to be a girl.

I never thought about any of this until I had a daughter of my own who also wanted to be a man. A mini-he, if you will. My parents never talked to me about my love of all things manly. If anything, they encouraged me to be who I wanted to be. They were very Catholic and pretty conservative, but they loved me for who I was. It was just never a big deal.

When my daughter turned 3, we packed away all of her sister’s girl clothes and pulled out all of her brother’s boy clothes. We weren’t going to force her to wear the princess-themed wardrobe of her extremely feminine older sister. She was much more comfy in her older brother’s dark-colored, sports and cars-themed, garb. Have at it, kid.

Everywhere we went, people would comment. On how adorable she was. People love her and her badass attitude. They love her boyish look. There is never a question she is a girl, because she has the most gorgeous, lush head of blond curls ever known to man. Pun intended.

This is why we were completely shocked at the reaction we got when our youngest son wanted to wear a dress. There is quite the double standard. And you know I don’t like my standards doubled.

Beau and I will be the first to admit that it was much easier to let our little girl be a tomboy. When it came to our son being a “tomgirl,” it was a tough pill to swallow. So we had to really think about why it bothered us. As it turns out, it doesn’t bother us, but it really bothers other people. The reaction we get in public is absolutely cray.

I called my husband at work one day and told him that I was afraid we would ruin our son’s self-esteem if we didn’t let him be himself. I was really upset because I was so afraid our little guy would learn to feel bad about himself and not love himself like he should. My husband’s reaction sums up the reason I married him. He said, “Well, then order him some girl clothes.” Yes, sir.

I thought I was going to have to convince him of something. But I didn’t have to. I think I was really trying to convince myself. And that changed my attitude completely. Why was I making such a big deal about it? So what, who cares? Turns out plenty of people care. Plenty of people that we don’t care about. Damn.

I wish I could say it’s always that easy. But it’s not. Sometimes things are really complicated. Some mornings, I lay out a pretty dress for our son to wear, but then it turns out he wants to dress like his sister that day. The sister that prefers to dress like her brother. It’s hard to keep track, especially if I have had some bailey’s in my coffee.

Sometimes our younger daughter prefers to dress like her older sister who likes to dress like a girl. One day both boys were wearing boy clothes and both girls were wearing girl clothes. It was a mess. Pure chaos. I was embarrassed to leave the house like that. What would the neighbors think?

When we go to McDonald’s and get happy meals, I order two boy meals and two girl meals. See what I did there? The McDonald’s crew are none-the-wiser. It’s like I’m playing a trick on them. The truck toy is for the little girl and the pony is for the little boy. I’m sneaky like that.

We have learned to put things in perspective. Life is so freaking short. My husband and I both lost parents too young and we have a child with special needs. When our baby was being tested for all sorts of chromosomal abnormalities, all we prayed for was our baby to live. Our prayers were answered and nothing much else matters anymore.

There are children with terminal illnesses and parents who have lost a child. We are not wasting one precious moment with our kids on nonsense. When it comes to what clothes our kids are wearing, we don’t care. As long as they’re name brand and I paid full price for them. In the grand scheme of things, that’s all that really matters.

If our kids turn out to be gay, lesbian or transgender, we don’t care. We love them. And right now, they are little kids. So we’re just going to let them be little kids. And just like we have taught our kids plenty of fun new words, we have also learned a few. Gender queer, gender neutral, transgender, gender nonconforming and gender fluid. None of these words scare us. All we know for sure right now is that our kids are gender-riffic!

Eileen O’Connor is an unemployed, orphaned-wife-mother, who has decided to put into words all of the stuff that goes on in her head.

Check out her blog nowirehangerseverblog.com

NoWireHangers,Ever on Facebook

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Auto Safety: Past is Prologue

It doesn’t take a comprehensive examination of American culture to notice the all too commonplace glorification of war. Violent war movies and television shows routinely make big bucks for Hollywood. Video games called “Call of Duty” and “Battlefield” sell millions of copies each year. Even history books are filled with stories of “great” battles won and lost. There are even devoted Civil War reenactors!

We are quick to recognize and commemorate wars that took enormous amounts of human lives through acts of intentional violence from opposing sides. It is unfortunately quite rare to see the same public attention dedicated to campaigns where preserving human life was the only true objective.

Michael R. Lemov’s new book is about such a conflict― called “the equivalent of war” by the U.S. Supreme Court― which was not fought with guns or bombs but by concerned citizens, safety advocates, and responsive legislators in Congress. The new book, Car Safety Wars: One Hundred Years of Technology, Politics and Death (Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 2015), is a comprehensive history of the movement for safer cars over the course of a century. Lemov knows his stuff―in addition to being a talented author and historian; he served as general counsel of the National Commission on Product Safety, chief counsel of the Oversight and Investigations subcommittee of the House of Representatives, and as a trial attorney with the U.S. Department of Justice.

Car Safety Wars is prime reading for anyone interested in automobiles and their development, the consumer safety movement, the mechanisms of democratic government, or simply those curious about the origins of the many auto safety features like seatbelts and airbags that now protect countless lives.

Here are some statistics to put the critical importance of auto safety into perspective. Over 3.5 million people have died due to automobile accidents since the first cars took to the roads in the early 1900’s. In the 1960’s, nearly 50,000 people died each year in car crashes and millions more were injured―that’s nearly the same number of U.S. military deaths in the entire Vietnam War.

In one noteworthy chapter of his book, Lemov details the background and life’s work of Rep. Kenneth Roberts of Alabama, who was a true pioneer of safety legislation. “Roberts introduced and pushed to enactment legislation mandating that household refrigerators be manufactured with safety locks on the inside of the door, so that children who might become trapped in them could push the door open…. He introduced legislation requiring the labeling of poisonous household substances, promoting public-educational television, and bills providing for health care for migrant workers and Native Americans. Roberts was a congressman, it seemed, who was instinctively concerned about the well-being of a wide range of people.” (Many of these proposals later became law as part of larger pieces of legislation.)

In 1956, Roberts was the first representative or senator to tackle highway and automobile safety when he introduced a bill to establish a special subcommittee to study the growing crisis of injury and death on America’s roads.

The auto safety movement truly took off in a serious way with the Congressional outrage following General Motors and its clumsy attempt to dig up dirt on me before and after publication of my book Unsafe at Any Speed in November 1965. The extensive Congressional hearings in the Senate and the House that followed brought to light overwhelming evidence that the auto companies were knowingly suppressing the use of long-available safety devices.

Lemov writes: “During the first six decades of the twentieth century the American automobile industry seemed wedded to the idea that safe design was not its responsibility. There was no public demand, it was said, for safer automobile design. Nor did the industry seem to think it had much responsibility to inform the public about the risks of vehicle design and the omissions such as lap and shoulder belts.”

Safety was not deemed a major concern in these early industry days, despite the fact that the knowhow existed―patents for airbag technology were first issued as early as the 1950s. Instead style and horsepower were favored over things like safety and fuel efficiency. Airbags did not become commonplace until the late 1980’s. Some younger readers might actually not recall a time when crash test ratings were not a fiercely highlighted aspect of car advertisements.

The seminal 1966 federal safety law that resulted from the auto safety movement has since saved 600,000 lives. The highway death toll has dropped from roughly 50,000 deaths per year in the 1960’s to roughly 30,000 deaths per year today, even though far more vehicles are now traveling far more miles. Together, highway death and injury rates have been lessened by 70 percent.

There are unfortunately few national problems that are less serious today than they were fifty years ago. The fact that our roads are safer is a testament to the power of public sentiment, citizen advocacy and a government that acts to promote the welfare of its people, not the interests of big business. In this sense, the “car safety war” is certainly a war worth studying, reflecting on, and celebrating.

However, the battle still rages on. A record 50 million cars were recalled in 2014 for safety defects. With recent developments regarding General Motors and its defective ignition-switches, defective airbags from Takada Industries, exploding Jeep Grand Cherokees from Fiat Chrysler, Toyota’s sudden acceleration, and many other dangerous defects that have been uncovered in the past few years, it’s clear that vigilant watchdogs are needed now as much as ever. Fortunately, we presently have some law enforcement tools to make the auto companies correct their deficiencies or face penalties and lawsuits―both good deterrents.

Car Safety Wars: One Hundred Years of Technology, Politics and Death by Michael R. Lemov is available to purchase here. Use promotion code UP30AUTH15 for 30% off!

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

How to Make the Most of Your Wedding Attire Budget

Looking for your wedding dress–and accompanying accessories!–is one of the most exciting shopping experiences, well, ever.

But since this is, ideally, a one-time excursion, navigating how to spend your money wisely can be a bit confusing–especially when you’re on a budget. You might be wondering things like: What’s worth splurging on? Do you actually need a headpiece? And how much should you really spend on shoes?

To help guide you in the right direction, here are some tips and tricks for making the most of your budget so you can look like a million bucks on your wedding day.

Realize that you don’t need to go designer to get a great gown.
While top high-end gown designers make amazing, sometimes even one-of-a-kind wedding dresses, these frothy creations can set you back thousands of dollars. Instead of splurging, or going over budget on a designer dress, check out stores like David’s Bridal, which offer beautiful dresses from designers like Vera Wang and Zac Posen for a fraction of the price. Or, if you have to have a certain dress-maker design your dress, scope out sample sales and second-hand dress resale sites like Tradsey.com.

Splurge on great shoes.
High quality footwear will be more comfortable on the big day, and if you buy a pair of shoes you love, you can wear them again and again after the wedding. Look for styles that are metallic (white can look super bridal and will be hard to re-wear) and steer clear of satin, which can get dirty easily.

Save on your veil.
Unless you have a daughter or younger female family member who might wear your veil again, chances are it will never again see the light of day post-wedding. Therefore, it might be wise to skimp a little on the veil–no need to get a designer creation.

Trade a traditional headpiece for flowers.
Rather than a tiara or bedazzled hair comb, ask your florist to create a cluster of flowers you can pin in your hair or a floral crown. More often than not, this option will be far less pricey and will be just as, if not more, beautiful.

Give jewelry as gifts.

Instead of purchasing jewelry as part of your wedding outfit budget, talk with your fiancé about giving each other jewelry (earrings for her, cufflinks for him, perhaps) as wedding day gifts to each other. This way, your bling will have sentimental meaning and it won’t cut into your wedding wear fund.

A version of this post originally appeared on Robbins Brothers’ Engaged blog.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Court Overturns Nun's Sabotage Conviction For Nuclear Facility Break-In

A federal appeals court on Friday overturned the sabotage charge against an 85-year-old nun and two other protesters who broke into a nuclear facility in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, in 2012.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit issued a 2-1 decision to uphold a conviction of injuring government property but overturn the more serious conviction of sabotage against Sister Megan Rice, 59-year-old Greg Boertje-Obed and 66-year-old Michael Walli.

The protesters broke into the Y-12 National Security Complex outside Knoxville in 2012 and spray-painted quotes from the Bible on its walls.

Rice is currently serving a prison sentence of 35 months but could walk free in a matter of weeks, her lawyers told NPR Wednesday.

“We felt from the moment we got this case that it was not properly charged,” lawyer Marc Shapiro, who represented the protesters pro bono, told NPR. “[W]hatever one might say about their trespass or destruction of property that clearly their intent was not to injure the national defense,” he said.

rice
Gregory Boertje-Obed, Sister Megan Rice, and Michael Walli await their federal trial in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, on February 6, 2013.

The court ruled the trio’s nonviolent protest had not posed a threat to national security. The opinion read, in part:

If a defendant blew up a building used to manufacture components for nuclear weapons … the government surely could demonstrate an adverse effect on the nation’s ability to attack or defend … But vague platitudes about a facility’s ‘crucial role in the national defense’ are not enough to convict a defendant of sabotage.

A judge sentenced Rice to 35 months in prison in February 2014 for breaking into the complex, one of the largest of its kind in the United States. The nun and her fellow activists cut 14-inch openings in the fence and spray-painted quotes from the Bible on the walls of a uranium enrichment facility. They also splashed a vial of human blood on the exterior.

“Please have no leniency with me,” Rice said at the time of judge’s ruling. “To remain in prison for the rest of my life would be the greatest gift you could give me.”

In January, the New York Daily News revealed the harsh conditions in which Rice was living at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

WWF #EndangeredEmoji Uses Cuteness For A Cause To Protect The World's Wildlife

An emoji tells a thousand words. But some of those cute little icons tell a story much bigger than our weekend plans or what we ate for lunch.

The World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) is using a group of emojis for a fundraising campaign called #EndangeredEmoji to help endangered creatures and their homes. The campaign highlights 17 animal icons found on the current iOS and Android emojis keyboards that in the real world are, in fact, endangered species.

Among these are the popular three wise monkeys which, according to WWF, are actually spider monkeys — as well as the giant panda, blue whale and lemur leaf frog.

endangered emoji

The campaign launched on Tuesday, with WWF tweeting out an image of all the 17 characters. Twitter users can take part in the initiative by simply retweeting the post. For every endangered emoji the participant then tweets, WWF will add 0.10 euros (about 11 cents) to a voluntary donation account.

At the end of each month, the participant receives a tally of all the endangered emojis they used, and can either donate that total or an amount of their choosing.

WWF illustrates each of these animals on the campaign’s website, providing a short description of each species threats and why it is in trouble.

To learn more about how #EndangeredEmoji works, watch the video above.

Like Us On Facebook
Follow Us On Twitter

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Keith Olbermann Tells Tom Brady To Sack His Agent

In his latest screed, ESPN’s Keith Olbermann has taken aim at the man behind the “deflategate” quarterback.

No, not Tom Brady’s dad. His agent, Don Yee.

“Tom, fire this guy,” Olbermann said on his ESPN2 show Tuesday. “You still have time to salvage something out of this. Admit this happened. Say it was an isolated incident. Take the blame, make a large charitable donation, go to ball inflation rehab and ask [NFL Commissioner Roger] Goodell to please not punish the rest of the team and the Patriot fans for what you did with such a harsh suspension.”

Olbermann took umbrage with Yee’s harsh reaction to the NFL’s “deflategate” investigation, which resulted in a four-game suspension for Brady. Yee said the league’s findings contain “tragic flaws” and suggested there was a “sting operation” between the NFL and the Colts. (It was the Colts, losers to the Patriots in the AFC Championship Game, who raised concerns with the league that Brady and the Patriots might be using under-inflated footballs to gain an advantage.)

In his rebuke of Brady’s agent, Olbermann also managed to poke fun at himself: “Tom, relax,” he said. “We’ve all been suspended.”

Olbermann was suspended by his current employer in February and by MSNBC in 2010. But look who’s laughing now.

H/T For The Win

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Marco Rubio Finds A Way Out Of Sticky Iraq Trap

WASHINGTON — With the dexterity of an acrobat, Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) found a way to do what his mentor and likely rival for the White House, Jeb Bush, did not: reconcile his support for the Iraq invasion with the political inconvenience of appearing to support an unpopular war.

Rubio, asked Wednesday whether, knowing what is known now about Iraq, he would have still authorized a war, said absolutely not.

“Not only would I not have been in favor of it, President [George W.] Bush would not have been in favor of it,” Rubio said following a major foreign policy speech at the Council of Foreign Relations in New York.

But Rubio gave a markedly different answer on the question of Iraq in March. Asked on the Fox News show “The Five” if it was a “mistake to go to war to Iraq,” Rubio said:

No, I don’t believe. … The world is a better place because Saddam Hussein is not in Iraq. Here’s what I think might have happened, had we not gone. You might have had an arms race to put Iraq in Iran — they both would pursue the weapons. I will be dealing with two problems, not just one. We forget that Iraq, at the time of the invasion, was in open defiance of numerous United Nations Security Council resolutions, that the United Nations refused to enforce. They refused to comply with allowing inspectors in. Repeatedly, this was a country whose leader had gassed his own people on numerous occasions. So I think, hindsight is always 20/20, but we don’t know what the world would look like if Saddam Hussein was still there. But I doubt it would look better in terms of — it will be worse — or just as bad for different reasons. I think it’s very difficult to predict, I think. A better notion is, at the end of the Iraq war, Iraq had an opportunity to have a stable, peaceful future.

During his run for Senate in 2010, Rubio similarly argued “that the world is a better and safer place because Saddam Hussein no longer is in charge of that country.”

The phrasing of questions posed to Rubio is key. On Wednesday, he was asked the same question that tripped up Jeb Bush — whether he would have given the order to invade, even if he knew that Iraq had no weapons of mass destruction. But in March, he was asked whether he believed the war was a mistake, full stop. That gave him some room to essentially say that, while he wouldn’t have gone to war under similar circumstances, he’s ultimately glad we did.

That gives him a leg up — if just barely — on Bush, who is still dodging questions about his murky position on Iraq.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.