I'm Cranky And I Know It

My 79-year-old mother recently quit her Torah study group. After listening to someone natter on for 20 minutes about a doctrinal detail that she found offensive, she stood up and announced, “I love you all, but you’re totally misguided.” Then she walked out.

When he heard this story, my son said, “Grandma’s getting kind of cranky, isn’t she?” He’s right — my mother has far less tolerance for inanity, along with dim lighting, bad weather, and most technology (with the exception of Pandora, which delivers a non-stop stream of classic country music for free, making it one of the great advances of the past 50 years).

I envy her frankness. I still have to listen politely to people I dislike; I rarely get the option of walking away. If my son told his math teacher she was misguided, he’d get hauled to the principal’s office.

But do people actually get crabbier with age? I’ve seen “lack of self-censorship” attributed to changes in aging brain tissue, low testosterone levels (“grumpy old man syndrome”), feelings of helplessness and late-life depression. Yet people over 65 are “happier and more satisfied” than other segments of the population, according to new findings from researchers at Northwestern University and the University of Buffalo.

Perhaps part of this satisfaction, which the study links to increased levels of trust, stems from the ability to finally say what’s on your mind without fear of consequence. Have older people simply learned to focus on their own priorities instead of bowing to the demands of others?

Whatever the reason, I’m looking forward to my own crank-aissance. Annoying clients, local politicians and aggressive salespeople better watch out.

As for my mom, while she later apologized for her outburst, she wasn’t sorry to have moved on. She literally didn’t have time for that. And why should she?

Earlier on Huff/Post50:

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

5 Common Mistakes Nearly Everyone Makes In Summer

Summer is the season we romanticize about. It means freedom from school, a chance to travel, the ability to sleep late, and months during which dining al fresco is possible. But sometimes, we do summer all wrong. Here are five mistakes we are making:

1. We don’t “vacate” on our summer vacations.

Work has gotten harder and job security more fragile for many of us. We work longer hours and technology has erased any semblance of disconnection from our jobs. We are all just a text away from getting sucked back in. It’s “The Godfather” brought to you via iPhone. Americans only take half of their allotted paid time off, according to a study last year by Harris Interactive for the careers website, Glassdoor. Further, 61 percent of Americans worked while they were on vacation, despite complaints from family members; 25 percent said they were contacted by a work colleague while on vacation; and 20 percent said they heard from the boss.

Vacations are for recharging our spirits, bodies and minds. Even short vacations — extended weekends — will reduce stress levels, according to research at the University of Alabama.

Take time off like you mean it. It’s good for you.

2. We expose our bodies to the sun.
How can something so bad for us feel so damn good? Don’t answer that. Sun damage to skin is real.

Most basal and squamous cell cancers develop on sun-exposed areas of the skin, like the face, ears, neck, lips, and the backs of the hands, says the American Cancer Society. Skin cancer is the most common of all cancers, with 3.5 million cases of basal and squamous cell skin cancer diagnosed in the U.S. each year. Melanoma, a more dangerous type of skin cancer, will account for more than 73,000 cases of skin cancer in 2015, says the ACS.

The solution is pretty simple: Use sunscreen liberally every day, wear a hat, cover up, and get thee to a dermatologist for a regular skin checkup. And we love the idea of the Shadow WiFi System, which will provide free WiFi on the beach if you stand in the shade. Tell us this isn’t brilliance? Is there anything we love more than free WiFi?

3. We don’t embrace enough summer foods.

Summer is when we have the best and largest selection of fresh fruits and vegetables of the year. Avail yourself of the abundance. Get creative, buy a new summer foods cookbook; don’t stick to the “if this is Monday, this must be meatloaf” routine.

4. We go on the bathing suit diet.
The desire to wear a bathing suit or the skimpier clothing that comes with summer generally brings about the semi-annual dieting effort. There is nothing like booking a vacation to St. Lucia to make that bag of potato chips suddenly seem less desirable. So let’s start by talking about your New Year’s resolutions? How’d those work out for you? For those committed to getting in better shape, you don’t need January 1 or June 21 to roll up on the calendar. The real motivation shouldn’t be the tropical beach and what you’ll wear to it, but the commitment to live a healthier and longer life. And if that isn’t enough to get you started, chances are that neither will a shopping trip for a bathing suit.

5. We don’t move around enough.

The flip side of our joy over winter being over is that summer has its own imprisoning factors: Some days, it’s just too hot to move outside the air-conditioning. That’s why we have early mornings and dusk. There’s also a reason why swimming is the perfect exercise come summer.

Like Us On Facebook |
Follow Us On Twitter |

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Obama Administration Pushes Back Against Environmentalist Trade Critics

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration on Wednesday released a report documenting its efforts to protect the environment through trade enforcement, the latest salvo in a struggle to win over environmentalist groups critical of President Barack Obama’s Trans-Pacific Partnership trade pact.

The report from the State Department and the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative emphasizes a host of American efforts to combat illegal trade in wildlife and timber, arguing that the pending TPP deal will expand on prior successes.

“TPP will help protect one of the most ecologically and economically significant regions of the world — from the deserts and plains of Australia, to the Mekong River Delta of Vietnam, to the Andes mountains of Peru,” the report reads.

The TPP’s wildlife protection standards have won accolades from the Humane Society, the World Wildlife Fund and World Animal Protection. But other environmental groups have been more skeptical, citing weak enforcement of such provisions in the past, and expressing concerns about broader provisions to expand trade in dirty energy, as well as to allow corporations to challenge environmental regulations before international tribunals.

Many environmental groups see some of the conservation victories the administration claims in its report as ecological calamities. The U.S. trade agreement with Peru, in particular, has been pilloried by environmentalists who argue that neither government has effectively enforced the deal’s conservation tenets. And while the administration cites its efforts in Peru approvingly in its new report, the Government Accountability Office issued its own analysis in November detailing weak enforcement in the Peru deal. While the pact included robust protections against the illegal logging of the Amazon rainforest, such activities have persisted with impunity since the deal’s enactment.

Green groups have railed against the Peruvian government’s environmental policies in the years following the pact. Last summer, more than five years after the agreement went into force, Peru passed a law rolling back labor and environmental protections in the name of increased foreign investment. A host of environmental groups wrote a letter to Trade Representative Michael Froman last year expressing “deep concern” over the Peruvian government’s move, and asking for the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative to take “immediate action” under the terms of the trade pact to push back against Peru.

USTR did not take action against Peru, and has never lodged a formal complaint over environmental violations with any government over any free trade agreement. But the Obama administration acknowledged the setback in its Wednesday report, suggesting that it would do more on the Peru deal in the future.

“We are working with Peru to understand the impacts of the reforms on the environment,” the report reads — including in new talks over the Peru pact coming up this year.

The Obama administration said that over 82,000 people had received training in natural resource management or biodiversity conservation funded by the U.S. government as a result of existing trade pacts, and secured over 30 million hectares of land under improved natural resource management.

Environmentalists still chafe at the power such deals have granted corporations to challenge conservationist regulations, however. In El Salvador, for instance, gold-mining investors have sued the government under a U.S. free trade deal, accusing the Central American nation of unjustly impugning its investments by denying it a mining permit on environmentalist grounds. A host of local green activists have been killed during the dispute.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Wednesday's Morning Email: Takata Recalls Almost 34 Million Air Bags

morning email

air bag recall

TOP STORIES

To get The Morning Email, HuffPost’s daily roundup of the news, in your inbox, sign up here.

TAKATA RECALLS ALMOST 34 MILLION AIR BAGS The recall will “double the number of cars and trucks included in what is now the largest auto recall in U.S. history.” Check to see if your vehicle is part of the recall. [AP]

WHAT THE FALL OF RAMADI MEANS FOR IRAQ’S ISIS STRATEGY The loss of the city has resulted in a weakened relationship between the Iraq government and the Sunni fighting forces necessary to drive back ISIS. The question becomes whether the U.S. will alter its own Iraq strategy in light of the defeat. [WaPo]

LA RAISES MINIMUM WAGE TO $15 The pay bump will go into effect fully by July 2020 for about 567,000 workers. [Alexander Kaufman and Jenny Che, HuffPost]

ELIZABETH WARREN CALLS ON HILLARY TO WADE INTO TRADE DEBATE “As the fight over a massive international trade agreement heats up on Capitol Hill, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) said on Tuesday that she wants to see Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton ‘weigh in on trade.’ In an interview with The Huffington Post, Warren declined to say whether she would endorse Clinton. ‘Right now I think it’s important for her to have a chance to lay out her views on a whole host of issues, including trade,’ she said.” [Dana Liebelson, HuffPost]

ATM THEFT SOARS “Debit-card compromises at ATMs located on bank property jumped 174% from Jan. 1 to April 9, compared with the same period last year, while successful attacks at nonbank machines soared by 317%, according to FICO.” Here’s why having your debit card compromised is worse than having your credit card information stolen. [WSJ]

WHY LATVIA COULD BE THE NEXT UKRAINE Why the country could be the so-called “fertile ground for [Russia’s] machinations to divide and weaken NATO’s easternmost fringe.” [NYT]

UBS TO SETTLE WIRE FRAUD CASE FOR $545 MILLION The move will enable the bank to avoid prosecution. [AP]

INDONESIA AND MALAYSIA WILL PROVIDE REFUGE FOR MIGRANTS STRANDED AT SEA “Indonesia and Malaysia agreed Wednesday to provide temporary shelter to thousands of migrants believed to be stranded at sea, a potential breakthrough in the humanitarian crisis confronting Southeast Asia after weeks of reluctance by the region’s nations to take responsibility.” [AP]

WHAT’S BREWING

NFL FINALIZES EXTRA POINT CONVERSION RULE CHANGES Extra point kicks will now be snapped from the 15-yard line, and two-point conversions can be taken back by the opposing team for two points. [AP]

DAVID LETTERMAN SIGNS OFF OF THE ‘LATE SHOW WITH DAVID LETTERMAN’ TONIGHT After 33 years and over 6,000 episodes, Letterman will say goodbye to the job about which he once said, “You’re just lucky enough to get to do exactly what you want to do all your life.” [USA Today]

‘GAME OF THRONES’ IN HOT WATER After a controversial rape scene, many fans have said they’re quitting the show. [HuffPost]

TWITTER CONTINUES WORLD DOMINATION You can now see tweets in Google searches about any topic. [Twitter’s Blog]

IN THE MIND OF THE NORWAY MASS MURDERER How Anders Behring Breivik could kill 77 people in one spree. [The New Yorker]

BEING TYPE-B ISN’T ALL BAD Or at least, that’s what this post assures our Type-A selves. [HuffPost]

ALL THOSE HILLARY CLINTON TV LOOK-ALIKES See Claire Underwood, Alicia Florrick, Elizabeth McCord and Mellie Grant. [New Republic]

YOUR STATE’S MOST UNUSUALLY COMMON DEATH CAUSE Because The Morning Email lives to serve your hypochondriac fears. [HuffPost]

WHAT’S WORKING

SUSPENSION: NOT ALWAYS THE ANSWER “In many school systems, the solution to a child acting out is suspension. In states like Washington, children get suspended from school as early as age five. But emerging research shows that not only is suspension not the best method of addressing bad behavior, it is often meted out with no consideration of the traumatic situations many students experience at home.” [HuffPost]

ON THE BLOG

STOP MAPPING OUT YOUR LIFE “The whole greener grass mentality is loaded and somewhat dangerous. We peek across the fence into each other’s yards and we wonder. We see lush green grass and we are too far away to notice the weeds, or the water bill. Sometimes greener grass is just rye grass; green for a season, then gone.” [HuffPost]

BEFORE YOU GO

~ We finally have this season’s Bachelorette and plenty of drama to go along.

~ Of course Martha Stewart’s Triscuit flavor is absurd.

~ Loreal wants to start printing 3-D skin.

~ Is your website mom-proof?

~ What’s in store for season four of “House of Cards.”

~ Christina Aguilera can do quite an impression of her fellow divas.

~ Need to have one of those important discussions with your partner? 8:15 p.m. is the magic time.

~ And the winner of this year’s “Dancing with the Stars” is

~ What a four-mile oil slick looks like.

~ Another think piece on the “fast-casual restaurant revolution.”

~ Behind the scenes at network upfronts.

~ Because all your favorite TV is on hiatus, Netflix released “Bill Nye the Science Guy” for your binge-watching pleasure.

~ $50 million-worth of heroin was seized in NYC.

~ The charities that may have stolen over $200 million.

~ Happy hump day: here’s a whale cuddling her baby.

~ The secret to Pharrell’s hat.

~ And the return of poisoning.

Send tips/quips/quotes/stories/photos/events/scoops to Lauren Weber at lauren.weber@huffingtonpost.com. Follow us on Twitter @LaurenWeberHP. And like what you’re reading? Sign up here to get The Morning Email delivered to you.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

The Right Way To Store Your Bathing Suits

Storing your swimsuits can be tricky — do they belong in your underwear drawer or in their own bin or basket? Should they be stashed in individual plastic baggies? How do you avoid getting them tangled in to one big ball? We’re here to help — there is a right way to store your swimsuits.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

David Letterman: TV's Greatest Host

As a kid growing up in the 60’s and 70’s, I stayed up late and watched a lot of the Tonight Show with Johnny Carson. During the day, there was Mike Douglas and Merv Griffin. There was Dinah Shore and Della Reese. Joey Bishop had his show and Dick Cavett was great to watch if you wanted something more highbrow. But if you wanted to laugh and enjoy yourself, you watched Carson, a show that made you feel you were at a party thrown by some funny, hip people.

After Carson left, it was difficult to imagine that someone fresh would appear on late night TV until David Letterman came along. Other shows and hosts had their moments. But Letterman seemed indefatigable and slightly nuts. Some of it didn’t work. But most of it did. Maybe you have a favorite Letterman bit. Mine was when I showed up to do the show, and they had me do a bumper where I rode around on the roof of the Ed Sullivan Theatre on a snowmobile. What did it mean? I didn’t think about it, really. When you did Dave’s show, it just seemed to make sense.

As a performer of any type, whether it be actor or musician or sports figure, etcetera, you have an obligation to promote your latest project. Sometimes that obligation is a pain in the ass. Few of these venues, like morning shows and talk shows, are fun or interesting. You also develop the creeping suspicion that none of it seems to have much impact on your work’s actual success. None of that applied to the Letterman show. Where other hosts weren’t all that interested in what you had to say, Letterman’s segment producers drove home the point that Dave wanted you to not only participate, but to be entertaining — if not genuinely funny. Doing the show was never a chore. It was fun.

Letterman himself, of course, can be intimidating. Going on his show and matching wits with him is something few can pull off. But over the past several years, audiences have had an experience with Letterman that they’ve had with very few entertainers. We’ve watched him grow and change. Earlier in his career, he was more aggressive, even predatory. Making his point and/or getting the laugh, regardless of the fallout, seemed to be the goal. It could be very funny at times, but something was missing. Whether you credit it to maturity or marriage and fatherhood or brushes with mortality due to health issues, Letterman changed. I don’t think mellowed is the word, because the aggression and bite were still there. The difference was it wasn’t aimed at his guests, but at some hapless yet ultimately deserving target at large in the world. Dick Cheney, Anthony Weiner, Donald Trump. In applying his skills this way, he became the Letterman I’ve enjoyed knowing, and that is the Gracious Host. That’s a difficult skill to develop, let me tell you. Letterman has mastered it beyond any. Even Carson.

That’s what I will miss about Dave. That’s what TV will be missing now: the cynical, bold, silly, unselfconscious, totally self-conscious nut from Indiana who became TV’s greatest host.

I’ve got very young children now, so maybe it works out perfectly. Now that Dave is gone and everything is on the internet anyway, maybe it’s time to go to bed early.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Curious Orca Investigates Stand-Up Paddleboarder In New Zealand

If you think you’re shaky on a stand-up paddleboard now, just imagine being nudged by an inquisitive orca while on one.

Luckily, Lukas Reilly, the paddleboarder in the video above, was surefooted when a killer whale swam up beneath him on Monday in Kuaotunu, New Zealand. Reilly, a New Zealand restaurant owner, managed to stay upright while the animal lightly nudged and pecked at his board.

Reilly paddled out after hearing word that orcas were sighted nearby, but didn’t expect to encounter any, New Zealand’s 3 News reports.

Killer whales are found throughout New Zealand’s coastal waters. While there have been a few reported incidents of wild killer whales threatening humans, they are rare and there are no well-documented incidents of a wild orca killing a human.

In January, a pod of five killer whales visited with a stand-up paddleboarder in Laguna Beach, California. After watching both encounters, we’re seriously considering investing in a paddleboard.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

'The Artist Is Absent' Celebrates Martin Margiela, A Fashion Icon Who Never Shows His Face

Despite being one of the most respected and influential artists ever to grace the fashion circuit, Martin Margiela has managed to remain nearly invisible.

Since 1988, the Belgian designer has never agreed to a single interview, nor has he been photographed for any magazine. Rather, he’s let his artworks speak for themselves — in deconstructed styles, exaggerated and disproportionate shapes, exposed insides and an avant-garde upheaval of fashion norms.

So how does one make a biopic about an artist that has never been seen? For starters, one titles it “The Artist Is Absent.” New York filmmaker Alison Chernick, whose previous documentaries have tackled subjects like artists Jeff Koons and Matthew Barney, has crafted a stunning 12-minute tribute to the inimitable fashion icon, exhibiting the crux of his aesthetic imagination without ever exhibiting his face.

Instead, Chernick invites his collaborators and disciples to wax poetic on Margiela’s genius, from his ability to create something from nothing to his total disregard for ego.

“He established a vision. And concentrated on reconfiguring an entire system of fashion,” fashion historian Olivier Saillard says in the short film. “He didn’t only introduce new clothes, he commented on the system.” Margiela was also known for obscuring his models’ faces with black paint, allowing viewers to better concentrate on the clothes.

If there was an artist fit for the enigmatic title “The Artist is Absent” — and thus accepting the obligatory comparison to Marina Abramovic’s “The Artist is Present” — Margiela is the guy.

“The Artist is Absent” is produced by YOOX Group and directed by Alison Chernick. The short film featured at the 2015 Tribeca Film Festival.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Divest from the Carbon Bubble

2015-05-19-1432052257-6352194-ScreenShot20150518at10.55.00AM.png

If it seems that we have more big problems than we can solve these days, take heart. A small group of people can create a worldwide movement. It has happened before and it is happening again.

Take the case of Ellen Dorsey, the executive director of the Wallace Global Fund. More than 450 people gathered in Denver recently to help the Alliance for Sustainable Colorado recognize her as a “hero of sustainability”.

Ellen is one of the founders of the divest/invest movement, which encourages colleges, municipalities, foundations and pension funds to sell their stocks in fossil energy companies and to reinvest them in solutions to global climate change.

As she tells it, the idea rose phoenix-like from two stunning defeats for advocates of climate action. The first was the international community’s failure in 2009 to reach an agreement on cutting greenhouse gas emissions. That was the year it was supposed to happen in Copenhagen.

Then came Congress’s defeat in 2010 of carbon cap-and-trade legislation. Foundations like the Wallace Global Fund had poured tens of millions of dollars into supporting the legislation and the Copenhagen conference, only to be outspent and outflanked by the fossil energy and climate-denial industries. “Four years ago we were all so very pessimistic,” she says now. “Hopes for a solution to climate change were at a 20-year low; the economic and political challenge was just too daunting. It was at that moment of profound reassessment that the divestment movement began to grow.”

The idea of making a moral statement with pension funds, endowments and philanthropic assets came up five years ago at a meeting where Ellen huddled with Alliance founder John Powers and investment experts Tom Van Dyck of RBC Wealth Management and Andy Behar of As You Sow. It didn’t take long to find out that the idea had resonance.

“In early June 2011, five organizations and students from eight universities hammered out the first plan for a series of campus campaigns calling on universities to divest their endowments from coal. It launched the following August,” Ellen says. “Some campuses tested a wider fossil fuel campaign, like the wonderful and courageous students at Swarthmore. Several campuses framed their campaign by calling for clean energy investments, to create their jobs, the jobs of the future. By the following spring, divestment campaigns had spread to dozens of campuses.”

The same year, the Carbon Tracker Initiative (CTI), a non-profit think tank that “aligns capital market actions with climate reality”, published a report that explained that human activity must keep atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide within a “carbon budget” to avoid catastrophic global warming. The global economy is close to exceeding that budget. To stay within it, most of the world’s proven reserves of oil, coal and gas have to become “unburnable carbon”.

CTI pointed out that this has major implications for the value of fossil energy companies and as a result, the global economy. Most of the value of fossil energy companies is in their underground assets.

In 2012, author and climate activist Bill McKibben explained this “terrifying new math” in Rolling Stone magazine. In clear prose and hard numbers, he noted that atmospheric warming must be held to no more than 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels; that the world would exceed 2 degrees if it put more than 565 gigatons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere; that proven fossil fuel reserves contain nearly 2,800 gigatons of carbon; and that therefore, up to 80% of the reserves will have to remain unburned. McKibben reported that the unusable reserves were valued at $20 trillion, as though the carbon budget did not exist. Because of the risk of restrictions on carbon emissions, the reserves are greatly overvalued, creating a “carbon bubble” not unlike the credit bubble that burst around 2008 and resulted in the global economic recession whose consequences are still felt today.

The risk of a carbon bubble was confirmed in 2014 by former Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, a Republican, in a column he wrote for the New York Times. “We’re staring down a climate bubble that poses enormous risks to both our environment and economy,” he wrote. “Each of us must recognize that the risks are personal. We’ve seen and felt the costs of underestimating the financial bubble. Let’s not ignore the climate bubble.” In a speech later that year, he said, “”I am looking at this through the lens of risk – climate change is not only a risk to the environment but it is the single biggest risk that exists to the economy today.”

Experts ranging from the International Energy Agency to the World Bank have since echoed Paulson’s warning.

Meantime, from her position at the Wallace Global Fund, Ellen Dorsey provided resources to keep the divest/invest momentum building. She rallied other foundations – 90 to date – to sign up. Today, more than 1,500 institutions and individuals who represent more than $60 billion in assets have pledged to pull all or part of their money from fossil energy companies. Institutions representing an additional $100 billion in assets have committed to divest from coal.

In addition to McKibben and 350.org, a grassroots climate action organization that has spread to more than 188 countries, Ellen singles out the work of Mark Campanele of the Carbon Tracker Initiative. “I believe CTI will go down in history as unleashing the single most disruptive concept that changed the debate on climate change,” she says.

“At critical points in human history, profound change is required,” she said in her speech at the Alliance’s hero event. “This is our underground railroad moment, where people of courage and conviction stand up and take action, where individuals are all-in, knitting together a beautiful quilt of advocacy, reinforcing each other’s efforts and building power for change.”

While the divest/invest movement reminds us that where we put our money is an ethical as well as financial decision, acknowledging the ethical and moral dimensions of climate change is not new. In 1992 for example, 1,700 of the world’s scientists including most of the Nobel laureates in the sciences appealed to society to wake up to global warming.

“A new ethic is required,” they wrote, “a new attitude towards discharging our responsibility for caring for ourselves and for the earth…This ethic must motivate a great movement, convincing reluctant leaders and reluctant governments and reluctant peoples themselves to effect the needed change.”

The moral imperative of carbon reduction has led a variety of faith-based organizations to become advocates of climate action. Pope Francis will issue the Catholic Church’s first encyclical on global warming this summer; he will address Congress and the United Nations later this year. The lay public in the United States also acknowledges the obligation to confront climate change. A poll in February by Reuters/IPSOS found that 66% of respondents feel that governments are obligated to reduce greenhouse gas emissions; 72% feel a personal responsibility to reduce their carbon footprints.

“When climate change is viewed through a moral lens, it has broader appeal,” Eric Sapp of the American Values Network told Climate Wire. “The climate debate can be very intellectual at times, all about economic systems and science we don’t understand. This makes it about us, our neighbors and about doing the right thing.”

The leaders of the divest/invest movement believe the right thing as well as the smart thing is to pull our money out of industries that are as indifferent as sociopaths to the irreparable harm their products are inflicting on everyone else on the planet, present and future.

Some observers doubt that divestment will have a decisive financial impact on the huge fossil energy sector, but that is not the point. The movement gives everyone with a retirement account, every university with an endowment and every philanthropy with assets the opportunity take material action against companies that put short-term profits ahead of people and the planet.

The Alliance event was a moment to celebrate the progress the divest/invest movement has made so far, as well as the power of dedicated individuals to make a difference. Yet everyone involved in the movement knows it has a long way to go. Too many of us are still invested in fossil fuels. As Ellen Dorsey puts it, “If you own fossil fuels, you own climate change.”

Graphic by the Carbon Tracker Initiative. Dr. Dorsey’s speech is available on YouTube. The DivestInvest website offers instructions on personal and institutional divestment and reinvestment.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Memorial Deal — VA Mortgages

Memorial Day reminds us of the sacrifices of our military families today and in the past. One of the ways our nation honors and rewards veterans and their families is VA loans that enable them to buy and finance a home at a low interest rate, currently 3.37 percent on a 30-year fixed-rate loan — and with zero down payment!

The VA does not make the loans. Instead it guarantees them, up to 100 percent of the appraised value of the property. And there is no mortgage insurance payment. In essence, the VA is guaranteeing the loan payments to the lender on your behalf, as a reward for serving your country. A VA loan can be accessed over and over again, as long as the original loan is repaid, with no age limit.
Here are some key facts about VA loans.

1. Service Eligibility: VA loans are available to those who served 90 days active duty in wartime or 181 days during peacetime (two years for those who began service after September 7, 1980) or six years in the National Guard. Applicants must have been honorably discharged.

2. Personal Criteria: Financial standards are somewhat less stringent for those applying for a VA loan (and yet VA loans have a far lower default rate than conventional loans). An applicant’s credit score must be above 620 (although some VA lenders allow as low as 580). He or she must demonstrate steady income, a two-year history of self-employment or a stream of retirement/disability benefits. Spousal income can help qualify, and some spouses of deceased vets can qualify if the spouse died of a service-related disability. Applicants must have no unpaid liens or judgments, and they must wait two years after a Chapter 7 bankruptcy and one year after Chapter 13 to apply.

3. Qualifying Properties: A VA loan can only be used for a personal residence (a house or condo) but not an investment property. However, if the vet occupies the property, a VA loan can be used to purchase two- to four-unit properties, using the rental income from the other unites to offset the mortgage payments.

4. Loan Limits: The current maximum amount of a VA loan is $417,000 but as high as $801,950 for a multi-unit, owner-occupied property. And the loan limits are higher in Alaska, Guam, Hawaii and the U. S. Virgin Islands. However, VA loan eligibility can be applied to a jumbo mortgage of up to $1 million if the applicant makes a 25 percent down payment on the amount above the conventional $417,000 limit. (Thus on a $517,000 purchase price, the vet would only have a $25,000 down payment — which amounts to less than 5 percent on the overall purchase price.)

5. Refinancing for Cash Out: A VA loan can also be used to take cash out of a home. Since the mortgage is guaranteed up to 100 percent of the home’s value, many vets choose to refinance even non-VA loans into a new VA loan, in order to withdraw much needed cash from home equity.
If you qualify for the VA mortgage program, you’ll need a Certificate of Eligibility (COE). Once you have that, most lenders will work with the VA to get the loan guarantee and process your mortgage. To learn more, go to the VA benefits website www.ebenefits.va.gov.

Or call the eBenefits Help Desk at 1-800-983-0937. In Illinois, and six other states, my VA loan expert is Daniel Chookaszian at Perl Mortgage, 312-376-2215. He is also a military chaplain, and has been a long-time proponent of helping vets access these benefits.

America remembers our veterans’ service. And that’s The Savage Truth.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.