Meet The Progressive Likely To Become Philadelphia's Next Mayor

A progressive candidate for Philadelphia mayor on Tuesday won a resounding primary election victory. Jim Kenney, a veteran city councilman, beat five other Democratic candidates, all but assuring him of replacing outgoing Mayor Michael Nutter.

Once considered a moderate, Kenney ran on a progressive platform, advocating for raising the minimum wage to $15 an hour, ending stop-and-frisk, decriminalizing marijuana, and restoring funding to the city’s cash-strapped public schools. As a city councilman, he fought for a bill that reduced cooperation between Philadelphia police and federal immigration authorities in detaining undocumented immigrants in the city, as well as a bill expanding LGBT rights.

Kenney won almost 56 percent of the vote.

His closest opponent, state Sen. Anthony Williams, got 26 percent of the vote, a poor showing for a major black candidate. Williams was well funded — largely from three libertarian hedge fund owners in the Philadelphia suburbs, who contributed almost $7 million to a super PAC connected to Williams. Williams has been a big advocate of charter schools and school vouchers, and his financial backers have also supported the privatization of education through their political and charitable causes.

Kenney has advocated for universal pre-K and greater investment in public schools. He was endorsed by Pennsylvania Working Families, which also supported several progressive city council candidates. The organization’s director, Kati Sipp, told The Huffington Post that a key factor in Kenney’s victory was distinguishing himself from Williams on education.

“Voters continue to send a clear message that they want somebody who is going to fix the schools and not somebody who is going to fix the schools by privatizing them or charterizing them,” Sipp said.

A recent Pew poll found that 32 percent of voters felt that K-12 education was the most important issue facing the city.

Kenney has pledged to give more control of public schools to local leaders, and to increase funding. Philadelphia’s financially unstable school district was turned over to a state commission in 2001. Crippling budget cuts to public education under former Gov. Tom Corbett (R) hit Philadelphia especially hard.

Sipp, whose group led grassroots mobilization and voter outreach for Kenney and the other progressive candidates, said Kenney’s positions on criminal justice reform and the minimum wage also were crucial in engaging undecided voters.

“I really feel like those were the three major things people were voting on this time around,” Sipp said.

With his progressive agenda, Kenney racked up a string of endorsements from unions, environmental organizations and the LGBT community. He also scored an endorsement from New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio (D), who said in an email to Kenney supporters that “it isn’t easy to make ambitious progressive reforms into a reality, but Jim will take on the tough fights.”

Kenney will likely win the general election and become Philadelphia’s next mayor, as the city has a heavily Democratic base. Registered Democrats outnumber Republicans by almost eight to one.

The race in Philadelphia provides a contrast to the recent mayoral election in Chicago, where progressive candidate Jesus “Chuy” Garcia forced incumbent Mayor Rahm Emanuel into the city’s first-ever runoff, but was unable to defeat Emanuel and his campaign war chest.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Privatization Fail: Scott Walker's WEDC in Full Meltdown

2015-05-20-1432093458-2680311-ScreenShot20150519at10.06.03PM.png

During the 2010 campaign for governor, Scott Walker famously promised to create 250,000 jobs in his first term.

Toward this end, one of his first acts as governor was to privatize the state’s economic development agency. Wisconsin Economic Development Corporation (WEDC) opened its doors in July 2011. After a series of damning audits, which highlighted mismanagement and incompetence, and news reports of special treatment for Walker donors, this week Democratic state lawmakers called for a federal investigation of the scandal-plagued entity.

Walker missed his jobs goal by 43 percent. Now we know why.

Scott Walker, Chairman of the Board

When Walker created WEDC in 2011, he named himself Chairman of the Board.

Although it was a privatized agency, WEDC was in charge of a staggering amount of taxpayer dollars: $519 million in bonds, grants, loans, and tax credits in 2011-2012 alone, and the WEDC board is ultimately responsible for those dollars. While experts debate the role state government plays in job creation, one set of jobs Walker can more precisely lay claim to are those created by the economic development corporation he governs.

In 2012, new reports indicated WEDC had lost track of $12 million in loans because it never asked businesses to pay back them back. The federal housing authority demanded changes at WEDC after determining it had spent some $10 million in federal funds without authorization. A damning 2013 audit by Wisconsin’s professional, nonpartisan state audit bureau made headlines when it documented dozens of ways in which the new agency was breaking the law. The audit showed that WEDC made awards to ineligible recipients, for ineligible projects, and for amounts that exceeded specified limits.

WEDC promised to clean up its act and reported to the legislature and the state audit bureau in October 2013 it had addressed all the concerns raised in the May 2013 audit.

But a new May 2015 state audit shows the situation is even worse.

WEDC Can’t Account for Jobs Created and Isn’t Even Trying

In 2014, the Center for Media and Democracy (CMD) spent weeks analyzing data and determined that for a two-year period (FY 2012 and FY 2013), WEDC could only lay claim to creating some 5,860 jobs. During the same period, the agency misled the legislature and the public by claiming to have created 60,000 jobs. Instead of counting the “actual” jobs created, the agency used the cooked-up phrase “impacted.” CMD’s report documented how jobs lost to plant closings in the state over the same period (13,616) trumped the job creation numbers.

A new audit by the state’s audit bureau helps explain why.

The new audit details that WEDC failed to demand that jobs be created with each contract. WEDC failed to make sure that projects hit wage targets. And it failed to demand sufficient documentation, such as payroll records, to show that jobs were actually being created or retained.

In one instance, WEDC executed a $4 million contract and allowed $1.6 million of it to be used for debt repayment. WEDC would not answer CMD’s inquiries on the topic, but a check of the WEDC data base indicates this award was made to SHINE Medical Technologies of Monona, who pled “business sensitive information” when contacted by CMD. In another instance, WEDC gave a business $517,000 in tax credits for “retaining” jobs even though it determined that the business employed 307 fewer eligible employees than a year earlier. A check of the WEDC database finds Plexus Corp. of Neenah, a company that has come under fire for taking taxpayer support then offshoring jobs, recording a 307 job drop.

On the jobs numbers, the audit gives us an update on the 5,840 CMD previously recorded.

Table 14 shows that in FY 2011-2012 WEDC programs were expected to create 8,754 jobs, but firms self-reported only 4,391 to WEDC. In FY 2012-2013, WEDC programs were expected to create 10,552 jobs, but firms reported only 3,503 to auditors. The 7,894 total is far less than the 19,296 promised.

State auditors had little patience for the numbers game, noting incredibly that “some information that should remain constant, such as expected results associated with contracts in previous years, changed in the online data from one year to the next.” Auditors pointed out one mysterious 607 drop in expected jobs that should have remained constant.

Shar Habibi, Research Director for In the Public Interest, a nonprofit group that studies the impact of privatization, told CMD: “Substantial time and trained personnel are necessary to monitor contracts to make sure taxpayer dollars are not being wasted. Like other privatized economic development authorities, WEDC has failed to provide the transparency needed to hold contractors accountable to their failure to create jobs. Without the professional staff at the state’s audit bureau, these abysmal findings may never have come to light.”

Habibi also noted that Walker has a history of failed privatizations reaching back to his time as Milwaukee County Executive.

In 2009, Milwaukee County Executive Walker declared an economic emergency and used his special authority to lay off the union security workers at the county courthouse. He then replaced them with Wackenhut officers at a time when the firm was already under heavy criticism for failing to protect the public while patrolling the Milwaukee transit system. In 2011, an arbitrator reversed Walker’s outsourcing of courthouse security and the county ended up having to cover back pay for the wrongfully laid off union workers, costing taxpayers an extra $430,000.

Tax Credits Awarded for Jobs Created in the Past Is “Parade Jumping” Say Experts

The audit examined WEDC’s management of $88 million in tax credits.

WEDC failed to evaluate the financial soundness of one company reviewed and failed to evaluate whether proposed projects would occur anyway without the tax credits.

But the standout finding of this audit is that in 36 of the 42 contracts examined, WEDC allowed recipients to earn tax credits for projects that began before the contracts were executed. CMD had noted this trend when it wrote about WEDC in 2014, but the audit shows that the problem is systemic. Auditors conclude that 14.9 percent of jobs were created before WEDC executed contracts with recipients.

“This looks like ‘parade jumping,’ when politicians pay companies to do what they were going to do anyway–or in this case, to do what they’ve already done. It suggests the state wants to take credit for free market forces instead of addressing so-called ‘market imperfections’ such as the credit crunch still plaguing small businesses,” said Greg LeRoy, executive director or Good Jobs First, a non-profit research group based in Washington, D.C.

The auditors were so surprised to have their 2013 recommendations ignored that they took the unusual step of recommending the legislature make it crystal clear that 1) all tax credit recipients must be required to increase net employment in the state, 2) tax credits cannot be allocated for activities that occur before contracts are signed, and 3) auditors suggested it was now time for the WEDC board to take responsibility for reporting to the public the actual numbers of jobs created and retained.

Writing Off Loans for Campaign Contributors

In case you think the audit is all negative, it’s not.

WEDC did reduce the amount of loans past due. $5.5 million in past due loans were decreased by a whopping $4.2 million in 2014. But the privatized corporation achieved this by amending 13 loan contracts to defer payments, writing off 9 loans entirely and forgiving 2 others.

One $500,000 unsecured loan that was written off was a bad risk from the get-go. WEDC approved the loan in 2011 even though the recipient firm was dragged into court for failure to pay its bills in 2010. Plus, the contract did not require that any jobs be created at all. CMD was the first media outlet to flag this problem loan, disclosing that it was made to Walker donor Bill Minahan, owner of Building Committee, Inc. After it got the loan, the firm racked up $757,103 in judgments and liens.

The Wisconsin State Journal recently took a deep dive into this loan, documenting that it came shortly after Minahan gave Walker a $10,000 contribution and linking it to Walker chief of staff Keith Gilkes and Mike Huebsch, Walker’s second-in-command as the head of the Department of Administration. In a separate article, the State Journal spoke to one unnamed employee who said that Minahan offered to reimburse him for making political contributions, a practice banned by Wisconsin law.

Walker Steps Up Damage Control

On the day the audit came out, Walker abandoned his effort to merge WEDC with the Wisconsin Housing and Economic Development Authority in the new budget.

One week later, and on the same day that WEDC released information about the failed BCI loan to the Wisconsin State Journal, Walker advanced the damage control by recommending to the legislature that they ax the $17 million WEDC grant program and the $19 million WEDC loan program.

Yet Walker continues to defend WEDC in public. This past weekend at the state Republican convention, Walker said of WEDC: “It’s been highly effective. That’s something that’s been consistent throughout all the discussion.”

But many in Wisconsin aren’t buying it.

In May 2014, One Wisconsin Now ran the numbers on WEDC loans and found that nearly 60 percent of some $975 million in assistance distributed by WEDC since 2011 went to firms that had contributed to Walker or the Republican Governor’s Association.

“This new audit confirms that WEDC is the embodiment of the cronyism, corruption and incompetence of the Walker administration,” One Wisconsin Now’s Scot Ross told CMD.

***

Find the 2013 WEDC audit here. Find the 2015 WEDC audit here.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

An Economic Solution to a Humanitarian Crisis

“For the displaced of Southeast Asia, the outlook remains dark. Even by the most optimistic estimates no more than half the present refugee population will be resettled in the foreseeable future. What’s to become of the others?”

That quote is from an article published in National Geographic 35 years ago. In the article “Thailand Refuge from Terror,” from the May 1980 issue, writer W. E. Garrett describes the appalling conditions in Southeast Asia driven by Communist aggression, genocide and starvation in Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia. Hundreds of thousands of refugees were poised to flood over Thailand’s eastern border. A map accompanying the article describes Burma, now Myanmar, with the following note: “Fighting between minority groups and the central Burmese Government creates a trickle of refugees into Thailand.”

That was then, and this is now. Right now hundreds of refugees fleeing Myanmar due to ethnic discrimination and persecution are adrift on boats in the Andaman Sea. Over the past week, vessels have been turned away from not only Thailand, but also Malaysia and Indonesia. According to the United Nations, over 25,000 refugees have taken to the seas in the first three months of 2015, which is more than double the rate from 2014. In order to address the regional refugee crisis, fifteen Asian countries are scheduled to meet in Thailand on May 29.

As history has shown us, refugee problems are not something new. And they are certainly not confined to Southeast Asia.

The most significant refugee crisis in recent years is the result of the Syrian civil war and the associated military conflicts in the Middle East. Millions have been displaced and are seeking safe haven in not only neighboring Lebanon, Jordan and Turkey, but also in Europe and beyond. Europe is also absorbing refugees from Africa. Just last month, a boat attempting to cross the Mediterranean capsized, drowning hundreds of the refugees on board. Even the United States has recently seen overwhelming numbers of asylum seekers flood across its southern border, largely fleeing conflict in Central America.

There seem to be two perspectives with regard to the latest surge of refugees seeking safe harbor in countries around the world. The first is communal empathy and general humanitarian concern. Pertaining to the wave of refugees crossing the Mediterranean, Martin Schulz, the president of the European Parliament, asked, “How many more people will have to drown until we finally act in Europe…? How many times more do we want to express our dismay, only to then move on to our daily routine?”

The second perspective relates to many countries’ fears of using their economic resources to support refugees. A recent comment from the Malaysian Foreign Minister, Anifah Aman, sums up how many nations feel about hosting refugees: “…we cannot afford to accept more of them, as a huge number already exist here–and so far no countries want to settle them.”

Many believe that it is impossible to put a price on human life. Yet this is precisely what happens when nations use economic arguments to turn thousands of desperate people away from their borders. When this perspective prevails, perhaps the solution is to address the global refugee problem not as a humanitarian issue, but as an economic one.

Currently, the most influential voice for refugees is the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). According to its website, “Its primary purpose is to safeguard the rights and well-being of refugees. It strives to ensure that everyone can exercise the right to seek asylum and find safe refuge in another State, with the option to return home voluntarily, integrate locally or to resettle in a third country.” The UNHCR’s job — and it is an essential one — is to advocate on behalf of refugees. However, there is nothing in its mandate related to addressing the economic hardship undertaken by countries that host refugees.

To help host nations to meet the economic demands of welcoming thousands of refugees across their borders, perhaps a global economic leader, such as the International Monetary Fund, should also participate in discussions of how to address the refugee crisis. Such a leader could encourage discussion about shifting the economic burden of hosting refugees from the host country to the country from which the refugees originated. Why not consider at least some of the costs incurred by a host nation as a globally recognized liability of the nation that the refugees fled?

The UNHCR already documents a refugee’s originating country and final destination. No doubt countries can quantify the per capita economic expense of hosting refugees. An independent economic organization (or even an arm of the UNHCR) could track these expenses and label them a “Refugee Expense.” Creating a Refugee Expense program would not only assist the refugees’ host nation, but it would also penalize countries that caused the refugees to seek asylum elsewhere. Host nations could have a variety of means by which they may settle the financial liability with the originating nation. Repayment, structured in the form of a loan, could be one option. Credit ratings for originating countries could be downgraded. Even trade balances could be modified using the Refugee Expense as a debit or credit to accounts between nations.

Our global community must strive to create a world in which no one is forced to flee his or her home due to persecution, discrimination, political instability or violence. However until such a world exists, nations that drive their own citizens to flee should be economically punished. This may also be an effective way to relieve the financial pressures sustained by host countries that provide both humanitarian and economic support for refugee populations. Critically, it may save the lives of thousands who perish while nations are paralyzed with indecision about how to provide basic humanitarian services.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

'Bill Nye The Science Guy' Is Now On Netflix; Cue Nostalgic Binge-Watching

Stop the presses and return home immediately: “Bill Nye the Science Guy” is now on Netflix. We repeat, “Bill Nye the Science Guy” is now on Netflix.

Social media has been abuzz this week with the news that several episodes of the beloved science show had landed on Netflix, where they are now available for streaming.

Bill Nye the Science Guy” first aired on PBS Kids between 1993 and 1998. Currently, 30 episodes of the show — out of 100 — are available online. Episodes include “Gravity,” “Digestion” and “Pollution Solutions.”

As The Daily Dot points out, some of the science covered in the show is now outdated. For instance, Pluto is no longer a planet (thanks in part to Nye’s friend and collaborator Neil de Grasse Tyson); and the human genome had yet to be mapped.

Still, Nye’s show remains informative and fun — and it’ll certainly suffuse you with plenty of nostalgia.

Commence the Bill Nye bingewatching here.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

An Employee-Referral Program on Steroids

If you look back over the history of business, you’ll see tremendous improvements in just about every area. In the 1980s and 1990s, for instance, Total Quality Management (TQM) was all the rage before giving way to Six Sigma and ISO 9000. Regardless of moniker, these movements drove countless efficiencies in manufacturing and quality control. Defect rates across corporate America plummeted.

Think about it. Compared to our grandparents, we are spoiled today. We take high-quality goods for granted. Recent automobile recalls like Takata notwithstanding, most companies long ago weeded out defects in their key processes.

Except where they haven’t.

Today, organizations’ efforts to effectively hire employees by and large remain woefully inadequate. Want proof? LeadershipIQ recently found that 46 percent of new hires fail within their first 18 months.

This galling statistic holds true the fact that recruiting has become more scientific–sort of. For a long time now, many HR departments have used behavior-based interviews (BBIs). The theory behind asking about would-be employee behavior is simple: the best performance of the future is the past. Rather than pepper candidates with silly theoretical questions, recruiters get specific.

To be sure, BBIs represent a slight improvement over hypothetical queries such as “Where do you see yourself in five years?” or the laughable, “What’s your biggest weakness?” Anyone with a modicum of knowledge on the subject, however, knows that it’s easy to game BBIs. For starters, anyone with a smartphone can easily search for questions that individual companies ask for specific positions. Brass tacks: If you really want the job, it’s not hard to school yourself on what to tell recruiters and hiring managers. That doesn’t mean that you’ll necessarily get the job under false pretenses, but you can certainly increase your chances.

Questions rooted in science represent just one tool in a recruiter’s box. For decades, many organizations have offered employee-referral programs. To be fair, their results are often generally positive. That’s not to say, however, that they can’t be improved. Case in point: ERE, an online gathering place for recruiters, reports that, on average, “It takes about 10.4 referrals to make a hire. Some companies are either so picky or get so many referrals that only one referral in 25 or more results in a hire.”

Not Your Father’s Employee-Referral Program

Fastidious recruiters will always exist, but clearly we can do better than the status quo.


Enter Peercisely, a San Francisco-based startup that aims to fundamentally change how companies fill their open positions. Think of Peercisely as a massive, democratic, employee-referral program on steroids.

At a high level, the company harnesses four powerful forces:

  • The most effective method of recruiting (personal referrals)
  • Arguably the most powerful and detailed source of knowledge and insights (the social network)
  • The power of good old-fashioned economic incentives.
  • The desire to do good.

In effect, Peercisely lets anyone can work as a part-time recruiter or referrer–and get paid for doing so. In this regard, the company is another compelling addition to the blistering on-demand economy, along with Uber, Lyft, TaskRabbit, Alfred, and hundreds of others.

“Employee referrals drive over 50 percent of hires in the San Francisco Bay area. Why not 100 percent?”, asks Arek Sokol, Peercisely’s founder and CEO. “Companies spend less on recruiting and hire better employees who stay in their new jobs longer. For their part, candidates help their peers find new opportunities and get some cash in their pocket. Everybody wins.”

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Windows 10 upgrade paths get more detailed

Windows-Product-Family-9-30-Event-741x4161It seems that Microsoft has settled on a new strategy involving Windows 10 announcements, leaving them in tiny bits and pieces all over the place, like breadcrumbs we have to follow, pick up and piece together ourselves. Of course, until we finally get the full picture, there will always be holes in our knowledge, questions left unanswered. The latest crumbs … Continue reading

Tiny palm-top UAV folds itself up like an origami quadcopter

Tiny quadcopters that fit in the palm of your hand have been around for a few years now, but very few of those drones can also fit in your pocket; what with their easily snapped rotor spars. However, a pair of researchers from the Swiss Federal Insti…

New Panasonic Lumix DMC-G7 Compact System Camera Unveiled

Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-G7

Panasonic has unveiled a new compact system camera to its line-up. Called the Panasonic Lumix DMC-G7, this interchangeable lens camera sports a 16MP Live MOS Micro Four Thirds sensor, a 2.36m-dot OLED viewfinder, a 3.0-inch 1.04m-dot free-angle touchscreen display, Panasonic’s Venus Engine 9 image processor, an SD/SDHC/SDXC card slot, a micro-HDMI output port and built-in WiFi connectivity.

Other highlights include 8fps continuous shooting, ultra-high speed AF of just 0.07 sec and three exclusive 4K Photo functions: 4K Burst Shooting, 4K Burst (Start/Stop) and 4K Pre-burst. In terms of video recording, the Panasonic Lumix DMC-G7 can record up to 4K UHD video at 30fps or 24fps.

The Panasonic Lumix DMC-G7 will be available from the end of June for $797.99 with 14-42mm lens. [Panasonic]

Waco Biker Gang Members Surrender After Release On Low Bond

Police defended Tuesday’s release of three men charged in the Waco, Texas, deadly biker gang shootout, after bail for them was set as low as $20,000.

Bail had been set at $1 million for each of the 192 people arrested in the Sunday battle at Twin Peaks restaurant that killed nine gang members and wounded at least 18. But three men — Juan Garcia, Jim Harris and Drew King — were freed Tuesday on bails ranging from $20,000 to $50,000.

Release of the men wasn’t a mistake, police said at an afternoon news conference. But judges who had initially set bail for the men quickly raised it on Tuesday to match the $1 million on the other defendants.

All three men surrendered and were jailed.

Low bail was set for the men because they were arrested outside the perimeter of the shooting and had different case numbers than the other detainees, KVUE reports.

State district judges Matt Johnson and Ralph Strother, along with Jail Magistrate Virgil Bain and McLennan County Sheriff’s Capt. John Kolinek, were trying to determine details of what led to the low initial bail. The Waco Tribune reported Strother said he received initial information that bail for the men had been reduced.

The judges ordered that none of the gang members’ bonds be reduced without approval from a district judge.

The deadly brawl that erupted between the feuding Bandido and Cossack biker gangs stemmed from turf rivalry, The Wall Street Journal reports. The New York Times reported the groups “intended to discuss bikers’ rights and how to work on issues of mutual concern” before the melee broke out.

Members of the gangs have reportedly have threatened to kill police officers.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Bill Murray Gets Baked For Final 'Late Show' Appearance With David Letterman

No one makes an entrance like Bill Murray — and he made one of his messiest entrances ever for his final appearance on “The Late Show with David Letterman.”

When Letterman introduced the comedic actor on Tuesday night, the curtain opened and revealed…a cake. With Murray inside.

While at least part of the cake appeared to be a prop, Murray emerged covered in cake and frosting. And he wasn’t shy about sharing it.

Check it out in the clip above.

In the past, Murray has entered the show as Liberace, Peter Pan, a dumpster diver, a marathon runner and wearing a tux after supposedly waterskiing at George Clooney’s wedding.

Murray was the first guest when Letterman’s show debuted on NBC in 1982. He was also the first guest when the “Late Show” launched on CBS in 1993. Since there are no interview guests scheduled for the “Late Show” finale on Wednesday night, that makes Murray Letterman’s final regularly scheduled guest as well.

Murray and “Late Show” bandleader Paul Shaffer also go way back. The two worked together on “Saturday Night Live,” where Shaffer was the pianist to Murray’s Nick the Lounge Singer character.

Shaffer told The New York Times on Tuesday that the Nick sketches caught Letterman’s eye, and helped him land the gig as leader of “The World’s Most Dangerous Band” for Letterman’s “Late Night” show and eventually as head of the “CBS Orchestra” on the current program.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.