The Illustrious Oakland Ballet Throws a Party Like No Other

2015-05-19-1432069226-9151835-Scheherazade.jpg
Joy Gim and Ron Thiele in Leonide Massine’s Scheherezade. Photo: John Markowski (1990)

This week marks a major milestone in the history of two storied American ballet companies on opposite coasts: American Ballet Theatre turns 75, and Oakland Ballet turns 50.

Bowing to their respective pasts, their gala celebrations spotlight two different golden eras in the history of ballet: the Diaghilev era in the case of Oakland, and the American pioneers of the mid 20th century in ABT’s.

A sybaritic film salute to ABT by Ric Burns, which just premièred on PBS, underscores the influence of impresario Serge Diaghilev’s Ballets Russes and its revolutionary collaborations with Stravinsky, Satie, Cocteau, Picasso, Bakst, Chanel and others, on the evolution of dance in America.

Oakland Ballet founder Ronn Guidi was passionate about reconstructing these modernist works, and this weekend the company will gift us with excerpts from five iconic ballets by Mikhail Fokine (Petrouchka and Scheherazade), Léonide Massine (La Boutique Fantasque) and Bronislava Nijinska (Le Train Bleu and Les Biches), as well as Vaslav Nijinsky’s groundbreaking, erotic L’Après-midi d’un Faune in its entirety. The décor for Ann Hutchinson Guest’s 1995 restoration of Faune has been resurrected for this season’s gala. For one brief shining evening, in the glorious precincts of the Art Deco Paramount Theatre, home to many of the company’s past seasons, audiences will be transported not just to Oakland Ballet’s early days but back to the heyday of the legendary Ballets Russes in the 1910’s and 20’s.

2015-05-19-1432069398-7090028-AfternoonofaFaun.jpg
Ethan White in Vaslav Nijinsky’s L’Après-midi d’un Faune, restaging by Ronn Guidi. Photo: Marty Sohl(2007)

2015-05-19-1432069501-5486788-LeTrainBleu.jpg
Oakland Ballet Company dancers in Bronislava Nijinska’s Le Train Bleu, restaging by Irena Nijinska. Photo: Emilio Mercado(1996 )

2015-05-19-1432069536-8463923-LesBiches1990.jpg
(l to r) The Three Athletes: Joral Schmalle, Ron Thiele, and Don Schwennesen with Oakland Ballet Company dancers in Bronislava Nijinska’s Les Biches, restaging by Irena Nijinska.Photo: John Markowski(1990)

2015-05-19-1432069659-4107469-OaklandBallet_Massine1.jpgTyler Rhoads and Daphne Lee in rehearsal for Léonide Massine’s La Boutique Fantasque. Photo: David DeSilva

Guidi’s curatorial tastes were not confined to the Diaghilev era, however. Under his direction, through the 1990’s, Oakland Ballet also revived modern American classics and commissioned new work. Eugene Loring contributed several ballets including The Tender Land, for which Guidi invited composer Aaron Copland to conduct his score.

Graham Lustig – at the helm of the company since 2010 – has chosen to represent this period in the gala program by excerpts from Loring’s Billy the Kid, Alonzo King’s Love Dogs, and Ronn Guidi’s The Secret Garden, and by the full-length Green by Carlos Carvajal.

Lustig thinks big. Not simply content with honoring tradition, he says “we must step away from it, too,” and has roped five choreographers, all of whom have longstanding connections to the company, to make new dances for the gala. In addition to Lustig’s world première to music by minimalist Max Richter, Val Caniparoli, Betsy Erickson, Michael Lowe, Robert Moses and Amy Seiwert – a formidable brigade of Left Coast dancemakers – are each crafting a toast to the 50th anniversary of this historic company.

And while tight finances preclude the furnishing of live orchestra for the evening, renowned pianist Roy Bogas will play live for Moses’ new piece, set to Satie, and for the revival of King’s Love Dogs, set to Poulenc.

Dying to see how Lustig was going to execute these heroic maneuvers with a lean, mean fighting machine of only 14 dancers, Ballet to the People tiptoed into Oakland Ballet’s busy studios at the Malonga Casquelourd Center for the Arts to spy on Erickson and Caniparoli at work on their new pieces.

2015-05-19-1432069706-23651-OaklandBallet_Caniparoli.jpg

Emily Kerr and Taurean Green in rehearsal for new work by Betsy Erickson. Photo: David DeSilva)

A duet for Emily Kerr and Taurean Green, set to the shimmering, soaring strings of Marjan Mozetich’s “Postcards from the Sky,” marks Erickson’s return to choreography after a long absence. Oakland-born, Erickson was ballet mistress for Oakland Ballet in the 1980’s, after her own illustrious performing career, and the pieces she created on the company back then were much admired. Her new, story-less duet situates Kerr and Green as equals, with similar qualities of strength in their movement.

As the silvery blonde Erickson demonstrated a sweeping movement of the arms with a slight twist of the shoulders, Kerr imitated her delicate but authoritative épaulement, and Ballet to the People was struck by the identical beauty of their serene, aristocratic profiles.

Erickson has Kerr and Green chew up space and together, they look like a god and goddess gamboling on Mount Olympus. They’re an intriguing pair: the fragile-looking Kerr, whose steely core emerges unexpectedly, and the imposing Green whose body lines slash thrillingly through space.

2015-05-19-1432069706-23651-OaklandBallet_Caniparoli.jpg
Sharon Wehner and Sean Omandam in rehearsal for new work by Val Caniparoli. Photo: David DeSilva

Across the hall, the animated, silver-haired Caniparoli took three couples through a lighthearted, caffeinated romp that had them slouching and stomping and ricocheting off each other and off the floor, a dash of hip hop here, a nod to French court dances there.

But first they had to work out a thorny new lift.

Caniparoli demonstrated it with Sharon Wehner, threading one arm through her arms that were tautly cocked behind her like the wings of a rooster. With his other hand providing leverage against a critical spot on her mid-spine, he timed his push to match her jump. She sailed through the air, snapping her legs into a split at the peak for even more oomph. It took a bit of practice before Sean Omandam, Matthew Roberts and Tyler Rhoads could achieve the same effortless propulsion with their partners. Daphne Lee and Alysia Chang rounded out the spirited sextet.

Once they had the entire sequence down with counts, it was time to run it with music. This knock-your-socks-off arrangement of Leopold Mozart’s “Toy Symphony” has been re-orchestrated for the 21st century, in a recording by violinist Gidon Kremer and the Kremerata Baltica, with the tinny buzz of a cellphone and the high-pitched drone of a computer-generated voice chirping “hello” in place of the more familiar toy trumpet, cuckoo and drum.

It was all the dancers could do to keep from cracking up as Caniparoli tossed witty movement jokes at them, but they had to work hard to syncopate the movement the way he instructed.

Grins broke out, however, once costume-fitting time rolled around. Of the bold, bright designs, Ballet to the People scribbled in her notes: “Alice in Wonderland meets Cabaret.”

Just as Oakland has weathered grave economic and socio-political storms, the viability of its ballet company has been threatened several times in recent decades. Lustig is a pragmatist when it comes to fiscal management. The magic that is making this gala come together is not magic at all: it’s the generous collaboration of dozens of former Oakland Ballet alumni – coming in to coach the present crop of dancers in the revivals, lending a hand with designs – and the goodwill of many organizations including the Paramount Theater, the Oakland mayor’s office, the unions. Lustig’s dreams of restoring the company to its former luster, augmenting his imaginative – and profitable – Nutcracker with a full spring and fall season, will require significant public and private commitment from a city that seems perennially strapped and preoccupied with other issues.

This is an image problem hardly unique to Oakland. Farther south, in the more affluent Silicon Valley environs, Ballet San Jose recently issued an emergency appeal for half a million dollars, and will require another $3.5 million by October to stay afloat.

Those with deep pockets who are looking to make an impact with their philanthropy may not see ballet as sufficiently cutting-edge, hip or relevant.

But Lustig’s impeccable programming taste and vision may change their minds.

The day after the gala performance at the Paramount, the company will take the party to Laney College, where it will perform its newest works alongside an array of local dance companies. These include the imaginative AXIS Dance, which unites dancers with and without physical disabilities, Walnut Creek’s spunky Diablo Ballet, The Milissa Payne Project, street dance crew Turffeinz, and Tessera Tribal Belly Dance.

Of the updated score that Val Caniparoli uses in his latest work, Gidon Kremer called it an attempt “to set Mozart in the frame of our time.”

With this gala, Graham Lustig does exactly that for classical ballet.

For more information on Oakland Ballet’s 50th anniversary gala weekend, and to purchase tickets, see their website.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

The 9 Spring Whites You Need to Be Drinking Now


As spring rears its damned gorgeous head and fills the air with the sweet perfumed scents of life “in bloom,” it must be met with equally explosive white wines of aromatic intensity and bright fruit character. So much intensity that the flowers will turn from the sun to bend toward your glass and birds will fall quiet with each popping cork, afraid that the wine will sing more beautifully than their own spring-y tweets. Hopefully these nine wines will inspire these righteous efforts.

1. CK Mondavi Family Vineyards Willow Springs Blonde Five, California, USA ($6.99)

Taste: White flowers and tropical fruit notes. Touch of sweetness in the end.

Drink It With: A fruity salad, ceviche–or save it to accompany dessert.

Factoid: Know thy Mondavis! Cesare and Rosa Mondavi moved to the Napa Valley and purchased the Charles Krug Winery in 1943. Their sons, Robert and Peter, created CK Mondavi Family Vineyards and day-to-day operations are handled by Marc Mondavi, son of legendary Napa Valley wine icon Peter Mondavi Sr. Got it?

2. Producteurs Plaimont 2010 Les Bastions Blanc, Côtes de Saint-Mont, France ($10)

Taste: Lots of bright, fresh, clean citrus flavor, bolstered by ample acidity and good mineral character and a refreshingly tangy finish.

Drink It With: Definitely seafood and oysters, but why not foie gras? Why not?

Factoid: This popular gem is made in a co-op and is a blend of three grapes you’ve never heard of: Arrufiac, Gros Manseng and Petit Courbu. Don’t think too hard. Just enjoy it.

3. Mat Kearny’s Verse & Chorus 2013 Sauvignon Blanc, Napa Valley, USA ($15)

Taste: A riper style of Sauv Blanc, showing mango and melon notes and a tangy lemongrass character, bright and refreshing.

Drink It With: Anything they cook in Nashville and also Thai curry spice dishes or Indian cuisine.

Factoid: Musician Mat Kearney, whose “Nothing Left to Lose” put him on the map, lives in Nashville and known for his use of the “spoken word” in his songs. So let this wine speak to you. This particular vintage is sold out online, but available at most Whole Foods Markets.

4. Inama Vin Soave Classico, Veneto, Italy ($15)

Taste: Aromatic white floral notes give way to a mineral-driven wine that saw a bit of skin contact, for some mouthfeel. Malolactic fermentation rounds out citrus notes and leaves a lingering almond note on the finish.

Drink It with: Sushi, salads and bruschetta.

Factoid: You’ve seen this label before. No more staring. Take home a couple bottles of this 100 percent Gargenega from the “classico” hills of Soave in the Veneto.

5. Cosentino Winery 2012 “The Chard” Chardonnay, Lodi, California, USA ($16)

Taste: Peaches and pear, hints of warm oak and brioche, vibrant acidity. Pleasant and balanced.

Drink It With: Any salad with spinach as the base. Or ham and cheese on a baguette.

Factoid: This wine is delicious and not much is produced, so try the winery directly to find out where it might be carried locally and look for the label’s red counterparts “The Cab” and “The Franc.”

6. La Caña 2013 Albarino, Rias Baixas, Spain ($17)


Taste: Aged on the lees and fermented in large oak vats giving richness, with stone and tropical fruit notes mingling alongside nice mineral character.

Drink It With: Beer-can chicken.

Factoid: Spain’s Rías Baixas DO (pronounced: “ree-ahs-buy-shuss”) is hot right now among the wine-drinking elite. There’s lots of water there: rivers and rain, which can cause rot, and hence vines are trained high on pergolas to avoid such malefactors.

7. Vietti 2013 Roero Arneis, Piedmont, Italy ($19)


Taste: Medium bodied, crisp wine showing bright yellow flowers, citrus and melon notes and a toasty almond note in the finish.

Drink It With: Prosciutto and melon balls, honey-glazed salmon or vegetable pizza.

Factoid: Alfredo Currado, one of the family owners, is credited with “rediscovering” the grape Arneis in 1967 when the Monkee’s “I’m a Believer” was #5 on the Billboard’s Top 100 Hit Songs of the year. This wine will, um, make you a believer in Arneis.

8. Comte Leloup Du Château De Chasseloir 2009 Muscadet Sèvre-Et-Maine Sur Lie, Cuvée Des Ceps Centenaires, France ($19)


Taste: Killer lime citrus, to the point of tasting like a candied lime peel. Bone-dry, however, and loaded with orchard fruit and a splendid chalky mineral finish.

Drink It With: Oysters and charcuterie.

Factoid: Produced by Bernard Chéreau, this sur-lie bottle-aged Muscadet (known as melon de Bourgogne locally) comes from pre-phylloxera vines, more than 100 years old.

9. Oro Bello 2013 Chardonnay, California, USA ($20)


Taste: Creamy and lush mouthfeel, lemon citrus on the nose, toasty oak and tropical fruit, mango and kiwi, on a clean finish.

Drink It With: Friends who know how to BBQ.

Factoid: Winemaker Alexandre Remy has a name for Burgundy: “Drops of Gold” and that inspiration led him to produce this wine, a blend of Chardonnay from Monterey and Napa counties. If you’re uncertain about how to enjoy it, he’s produced this video to give you some ideas.


Jonathan Cristaldi was dubbed a “Wine Prophet” by Time Out New York for his unconventional creativity as founder, educator, entertainer and host of The Noble Rot. Cristaldi’s work has also appeared in Los Angeles Magazine, Time Out LA, First We Feast, Thrillist, Tasting Table, The SOMM Journal, Tasting Panel Magazine and he is Editor of NapaValleyWineAcademy.com.



More from Liquor.com:

Make/Do: Oleo Saccharum: The Miracle Method for Getting The Most Out of Your Citrus

This is How to Build the Best Bar with Cheap Spirits

5 of the Most Bizarre Alcoholic Drinks in the World

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Who Cares What You Believe; Where Does Your Fidelity Lie?

On May 18, following the recent Pew study, Michael Smerconish and Rachel Held Evans talked about why millennials are leaving churches in greater numbers than previous generations of young people. The word “belief” came up several times during their conversation, as did the idea of mystery. One of Smerconish’s staff members also chimed in about taking a “leap of faith” – believing in something even if you can’t prove it.

Though the conversation was engaging, I wish we could abolish the words “faith” and “belief” from all future conversations about religion. Defining faith as the opposite of knowledge is precisely why some religious believers still think science is the enemy, and why some New Atheists still think religion is exclusively for idiots. This modernist debate has had its day. Subtle changes in vocabulary could allow for more interesting 21st century conversations.

The modern Western obsession with faith/belief comes mainly from the New Testament as interpreted through Protestant Christianity. The Greek word that is usually translated as “faith” is pistis, but pistis can also be translated as “faithfulness” or “fidelity.” (The word “belief” is related – pisteuo – to be faithful to or entrust.) While this may seem a minor change, a different translation can radically shift understanding from passive assent to active embodiment.

As long as belief means “thinking something untrue or unprovable is fact,” it will always be the enemy of “knowledge” and “reason” – the gods of our age. But consider the radical newness of John 3:16 in light of such a translation: “For God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son, so that whoever is faithful to him shall not perish but have eternal life.” Suddenly this goes from sounding like magic to sounding like a call to action.

Likewise, to say “I pledge fidelity to God” suggests something very different than “I believe in God.” The latter requires virtually nothing, while the former implies love, duty, even sacrifice. The New Testament letter of James is utterly unimpressed with simple belief: “Fidelity without works is dead… Show me your fidelity part from your works… You believe that God is one; you do well. Even the demons believe–and shudder” (Jas. 2:17-19). In other words, so what if you assent intellectually to an idea? If you don’t actually behave in a way that shows fidelity to that idea, what is the purpose of your so-called faith? (The Quran shares this sentiment, repeatedly admonishing hearers to “believe and do good deeds.”)

“Faith” invites ridiculous contradictions, while “fidelity” lays hypocrisy bare. For example, I believe that climate change is caused by humans, but that belief (based on my faith in scientific consensus) is almost worthless. Why? Because while I do aspire to being a faithful steward of my tiny piece of the world, in the end my fidelity to family and career and (let’s be honest) comfort win out over my fidelity to the earth’s long-term health. I fly on planes, am incessantly on the fossil-fuel-gobbling internet, and consume non-local coffee and water-intensive almond butter. Whereas someone like No Impact Man provides an example of actual fidelity to the cause of mitigating climate change, belief costs very little.

Fidelity is exponentially more difficult and demanding than “faith.” Simply agreeing with someone or something as we scan past it on Twitter or TV costs us very little. But fidelity to a life partner is hard. Fidelity to excellence in a sport or the performing arts is hard. Fidelity to veganism is hard. Fidelity to the liberal arts is hard. Fidelity to social justice is hard. And fidelity to a particular religious community or tradition is hard, particularly if it’s a minority tradition.

On a public level, substituting “fidelity” for “faith” in our discussions would let us get past the tired faith-versus-science debate (or even the faith-versus-works debate). And on a personal level, all of us could benefit from analyzing our own embodied lives to find out to what or to whom we are authentically faithful.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Concentrated Affluence: How to Harness the Buying Power of Asian American Consumers

If Asian Americans were a country, their spending would represent the eighteenth largest economy in the world. The numbers are staggering, yet many brands continue approaching their multicultural marketing efforts solely considering Hispanic and African-American audiences. Asian Americans are often considered an afterthought pending the availability of leftover budget.

I had the opportunity to catch up with Tim Wang, Founder and Principal of TDW+Co, a cross-cultural advertising agency that works with brands such as Verizon Communications, Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Principal Financial Group and Waste Management by helping them appeal to the new mainstream of America. Tim took some time to explain the business opportunity presented by the Asian American consumer and why it is critical that this segment of the population be at the forefront of a multicultural marketing strategy.

A little goes a long way

Tim explained that Asian American buying power is mighty. He noted that while this consumer segment comprises a smaller portion of the American population, its purchasing power per household is higher than any other racial group – Asian American household spending is currently 20 percent more than that of the general market and is expected to reach a total of $1 trillion by the year 2017.

Members of the Asian American community often lead affluent lifestyles and value luxury goods; in fact, according to my company’s research, Asians over-index in spending on financial services, cars and education.

Despite the purchasing power of Asian Americans, skeptics continue to believe that targeting Asians isn’t a high priority. To that, Tim argued that Asians are in the midst of outpacing even Hispanics in population growth with a 2.9 percent growth rate, (compared to the Hispanic population’s 2.1 percent growth rate) which is higher than that of any other population group. Although Hispanics are more than three-times more numerous, Asians have far greater per household income than any other race group, including white non-Hispanics (Anglos).

The diversity of “Asian”

While the proof is in the pudding, marketers remain hesitant to double down their efforts on the Asian American population. This is likely due to the diversity of the community, which is made up of varied nationalities, which fall under the Asian umbrella, each with their own respective languages, heritage and traditions.

Though there are similar cultural traits between the various Asian segments, the unique diversity and language differences present a difficult challenge for brands to create a simple strategy that reaches the broader Asian community. Instead, smart marketers create multiple versions of creative and messaging components to build an effective, inclusive marketing campaign. This is admittedly an investment, but if done correctly can earn them exponential rewards.

Pilot and evaluation

Finally, I asked Tim how he recommends that a novice should approach the market, and he suggested that a company take their first steps with a pilot or trial period. He explained that by focusing on two or possibly three key language groups, an organization is able to execute a smaller, more manageable campaign that can be expanded and scaled effectively.

Tim and I also agreed that grounding a campaign in data and concrete insights is critical to success. If you gain a holistic understanding of your target market, your campaign is bound to appear dramatically different and be far more effective than one based off of guesswork and stereotypes.

Today’s technology offers a level of sophistication that enables users to define and code individuals by country of origin, acculturation and language, information that is necessary to build a successful campaign. Marketers will be well on their way to success if they recognize the diversity within the Asian American population segment.

I often hear that the entire concept of multicultural marketing is incredibly daunting, yet it doesn’t have to be – and my discussion with Tim was no exception. Ask any brand that has successfully executed a campaign and they will echo that the effort was worthwhile. The numbers do not lie – and Asian Americans are one of the fastest growing demographics within the new mainstream of consumers. It’s important that we as marketers overcome our hesitations and begin taking advantage of this immense business opportunity.

How does your company address the Asian market? Is it a high-priority? If there is hesitation, what is the reason for that? Do they understand the level of growth and buying power?

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

The Chokehold of Calendars

Meetings may be toxic, but calendars are the superfund sites that allow that toxicity to thrive. All calendars suck. And they all suck in the same way. Calendars are a record of interruptions. And quite often they’re a battlefield over who owns whose time.

In my experience, most people don’t schedule their work. They schedule the interruptions that prevent their work from happening. In the case of a business like ours, what clients pay us to make and do happens in the cracks between meetings, or worse, after business hours.

I’ve yet to see a résumé–and I hope I never do– that lists “attends meetings well” as a skill. Yet attending meetings ends up being a key component of many jobs. And it’s stupid.

The problem here is two-fold. Part of it is software. Part of it is human behavior. You can’t fix the software without adjusting the human behavior. And there is no point to addressing the human behavior if the software won’t support it.

Let’s start with the premise that you have a 40 hour week. (If you just started crying you need a new job.) That’s 40 hours of time to do your job. Now look at your calendar. If your job is to spend a very large part of those 40 hours in meetings scheduled for you by other people then you’re fine. If your job is to produce things such as code, comps, analyses, flow documents, etc., then why isn’t the time to do that on your calendar?

People rarely schedule working time. And when they do it’s viewed as second-tier time. It’s interruptible. Meetings trump working time. Why? And why so often are the same people who assign deadlines the same ones reassigning all of your time? Crazymaking. They should be securing work time for you and protecting it fiercely.

Why are you letting other people put things on your calendar? The idea of a calendar as a public fire hydrant for colleagues to mark is ludicrous. The time displayed on your calendar belongs to you, not to them. It’s been allocated to you to complete tasks. Why are you taking time away from your coding project to go to a meeting that someone you barely know added you to without asking and without the decency to have submitted an agenda?

Start saying no.

Why do you feel like others have more of a right to your time than you do? The time is yours.

The problem with calendars is that they are additive rather than subtractive. They approach your time as something to add to rather than subtract from. Adding a meeting is innocuous. You’re acting on a calendar. A calendar isn’t a person. It isn’t even a thing. It’s an abstraction. But subtracting an hour from the life of another human being isn’t to be taken lightly. It’s almost violent. It’s certainly invasive. Shared calendars are vessels you fill by taking things away from other people.

“I’m adding a meeting” should really be “I’m subtracting an hour from your life.”

We need a goal-oriented calendar, but first we need to understand why a goal-oriented calendar is necessary.

Imagine that rather than scheduling individual points in time, such as meetings, you were instead scheduling a goal. With all its dependencies with it. A simplified model might look like this:
2015-05-18-1431987304-2078007-0DnKdxnXM0ufu1Jh.png

By handling events as something we work towards and need time to produce things for, rather than as disruptive singularities, and by respecting that work time as something associated with a goal we achieve a calendar that shows both those meetings, now less inane, and the time time necessary to do the work that will make those meetings successful.

Most of these things currently exist. Across multiple applications. And badly. Now it’s time to fix that.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Grassroots Organization That Came From a Place of Pain

Cheryl ‘Action’ Jackson has been rolling out the red carpet for those in her community for over seven years and giving every family the celebrity treatment. Cheryl has not only inspired those in her community, but recently had the opportunity to inspire people all over the world through her recent appearance on Good Morning America as she found out that she was the winner of the 2015 Animated film Home Movie Premier Contest.

In 2008 Cheryl started a food pantry with food from her kitchen in Plano, Texas to give free healthy meals to families in need. Since her start in 2008 the non-profit organization Minnie’s Food Pantry which is named after her late mother Minnie Hawthorne-Ewing has grown tremendously. Today they have served over four million meals and still counting.

“My parents had little finances, but a Huge Heart! They lead by example” – Cheryl ‘Action’ Jackson, Founder

Cheryl’s contribution to those in her community and abroad has made a tremendous impact and through her hard work and dedication she has received awards from the BET Network for her efforts and was awarded the progressive charity with a gift of $30,000 and Steve Harvey awarded her with the “Harvey’s Hero Award” along with a gift of $25,000 from Hillshire Farm. Cheryl has been the recipient of many awards and has also made national appearances on The Talk, ABC World News with Diane Sawyer and many more.

Cheryl has always had a strong desire to give back to those in her community in a major way because of how her mother taught her. Minnie’s Pantry has allowed Cheryl to not only give back to her community, but to give those in need hope for a brighter future. There was a time in Cheryl’s life where her family was in need and she learned quickly about the treatment many received as they would go and apply for public assistance. It was then that she decided to do something that would provide healthy meals, motivate, and uplift each individual that were in desperate need.

“Minnie’s Food Pantry is a grassroots organization that came from a place of pain. This week I lost the woman for whom the pain inspired my passion, Minnie Hawthorne-Ewing.” – Cheryl ‘Action’ Jackson, Founder

Every family at Minnie’s Pantry is greeted with a warm smile, a lot of love, and given the celebrity treatment as they enter. Cheryl wants families to know that they will make it regardless of their temporary situation. On May 7, 2015, Cheryl lost her mother and even at this difficult time in her life she is using her journey to inspire others through her amazing strength.

Many may not have had the honor of being in her mother’s presence, but through the courageous courage, love, and dedication that drives Cheryl ‘Action’ Jackson you can see that her mother was a phenomenal woman with a heart of gold. Cheryl and her mother Minnie had the honor of having their story archived in the Smithsonian National Museum of African American History.

This post is in memory of Cheryl’s mother Minnie Hawthorne-Ewing. If you would like to read Cheryl’s inspiring story or learn more about Minnie’s Food Pantry, please click on the link below.

Minnie’s Food Pantry Website:
http://minniesfoodpantry.org/

2015-05-18-1431928687-5973432-HuffingtonPostCheryl.jpg
Cheryl ‘Action’ Jackson hugs her mother Minnie Hawthorne-Ewing

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

6 TV Shows & Movies That Made These Drinks Famous

Everyone from James Bond to the Blues Brothers have given certain cocktails their due on the big screen. While these boozy beverages existed long before they appeared in films, it’s hard to disassociate them from the actors and actresses who drank them. Ahead, six drinks that popped up in television and movies and left an indelible mark on drinkers everywhere.




More from Liquor.com:

Make/Do: Oleo Saccharum: The Miracle Method for Getting The Most Out of Your Citrus

This is How to Build the Best Bar with Cheap Spirits

5 of the Most Bizarre Alcoholic Drinks in the World

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

HUFFPOST HILL – Team Clinton Lifts Moratorium On Candidate Providing Canned Answers To Predictable Questions

David Brooks called mistakes leading up to the Iraq war “data points in a larger education,” which is, oddly enough, what William Randolph Hearst said about the Spanish-American War. President Obama has long espoused a Kenyan anti-colonial philosophy, so why is he so upset about colony collapse disorder? And Claire McCaskill tweeted her displeasure with “Game of Thrones,” much like that time when Louie Gohmert bemoaned “Mad Men” losing its slow-boiling ennui and transcendent meditations on materialism and intimacy. This is HUFFPOST HILL for Tuesday, May 19th, 2015:

MCCONNELL PLANS VOTE ON HOUSE PATRIOT ACT BILL – Plus a voice vote on S.RES.211 “I Miss You, Jim Bunning, I Miss You So Very Much.” Burgess Everett: “Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said on Tuesday he will allow a vote on the House’s surveillance reform bill this week, even though it may not be able to pass the Senate. McConnell told reporters on Tuesday that the Senate needs to see “where the votes are” to keep in place expiring PATRIOT Act provisions. McConnell favors a straight extensions of current law. A bill he has introduced would keep in place bulk data collection programs, which were exposed by Edward Snowden. But the popular House-passed bill would eliminate it.” [Politico]

BOEHNER WANTS OBAMA TO ‘START OVER’ ON WAR AUTHORIZATION – Because Congress is hard. Jen Bendery: “House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) hasn’t taken any action to authorize the ongoing war against Islamic State militants. But on Tuesday, he criticized President Barack Obama’s proposal for authorizing the military campaign, and said Obama should just withdraw it. ‘The president’s request for an Authorization of Use of Military Force calls for less authority than he has today. I just think, given the fight that we’re in, it’s irresponsible,’ Boehner told reporters. ‘This is why the president, frankly, should withdraw the Authorization of Use of Military Force and start over.’ It’s been nine months since the U.S. began bombing the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria, or ISIS, without new congressional authorization. The Constitution requires Congress to declare wars, but in this case, Obama has said he doesn’t need lawmakers’ sign-off because a sweeping 2001 AUMF covers his actions.” [HuffPost]

Ebony and ivory, in our mailbox: “ACLU & Tea Party Patriots Co-Sponsor TV Ads Calling for Washington to Rein In Government Surveillance”

HILLARY DOES THING! – Congrats, Sidney Blumenthal! You’re a Hillary “friend!” …for “a long time!” That’s gotta be worth at least a few mil in net worth! Boomshakalaka! Igor Bobic: “Hillary Clinton on Tuesday called for the immediate release of email correspondence sent during her tenure as secretary of state, saying that the email records are ‘not mine, they’re the State Department’s.’ ‘Nobody has a bigger interest in getting them released than I do,’ the presidential contender told reporters during a campaign event in Iowa. She urged State Department officials to ‘please move as quickly as they possibly can to get them out.’ … Clinton also brushed off concerns raised in The New York Times about her correspondence with Sidney Blumenthal, a longtime friend. The two were in communication about Libya while Clinton was at the State Department. ‘He’s been a friend of mine for a long time,’ Clinton told reporters Tuesday. ‘I’m going to keep talking to my old friends, whoever they are.'” ‘[HuffPost]

Committee For Americans Who Don’t Want Alex Seitz-Wald To Be Big-Footed By Richard Wolffe Or Whoever Once The Clinton Campaign Heats Up

Haircuts: Jess McIntosh (h/t television)

DAILY DELANEY DOWNER – A faction of Republicans in the House of Representatives wants to stop poor people from buying junk food with food stamps. Under proposed new legislation, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program’s 45 million enrollees would only be able to use their benefits for lean meat, poultry and food products approved under a separate federal nutrition program that supports nutrition for pregnant women, infants and children. Energy drinks out would be out; Enfamil in. “Over the years, the nutrition portion of food stamps has become obsolete,” Rep. Tom Rice (R-S.C.), who authored the legislation, said in a statement. “Today, beneficiaries can use taxpayer dollars to purchase nearly anything in the grocery store. Meanwhile, families barely living over the poverty threshold are pinching pennies and clipping coupons to make ends meet.” [HuffPost]

Does somebody keep forwarding you this newsletter? Get your own copy. It’s free! Sign up here. Send tips/stories/photos/events/fundraisers/job movement/juicy miscellanea to huffposthill@huffingtonpost.com. Follow us on Twitter – @HuffPostHill

HEDGE FUND MANAGERS SAVED FROM PENURY FOR AT LEAST A COUPLE OF YEARS – No child should have to suffer through their father coming home from his job in Stamford in an Acura wearing a suit from *gulp* Macy’s. We can’t let the innocent suffer. Richard Rubin: “‘Any major changes to private equity’s most favored tax break won’t happen until 2017,’ House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Paul Ryan said. Ryan said he’s excluding the taxation of carried interest from this year’s bipartisan attempt to revamp business taxes, sparing fund managers from any change. ‘That is on the individual side of the code, so it’s not something that we’re looking at right now,’ Ryan, a Wisconsin Republican, said at an accounting conference in Washington Tuesday…Obama wants to tax the carried interest of private-equity managers, venture capitalists, some hedge fund executives and real estate managers as ordinary income instead of capital gains. That proposal would raise $17.7 billion over a decade, according to the Treasury Department. Carried interest is the profits interest that private-equity managers receive in the companies they take over and manage.” [Bloomberg]

BEADS??? – Trust us, you don’t even want to know how this one factors into the planned invasion of Texas. Tennille Tracy: “The White House is backing efforts to scrutinize the link between pesticides and a dramatic increase in honeybee deaths. In a report Tuesday, a White House task force said it wanted to see the number of honeybee deaths drop to 15% during the cold winter months when bees are particularly vulnerable. The task force laid out a multipronged strategy to research the problem and to improve and expand honeybee habitats. Winter loss rates are well above the task force’s stated goal, reaching 23% in the most recent winter. The annual loss rate, meanwhile, reached 42% for the 12-month-period ending in April, the U.S. Agriculture Department said earlier this month. Among the many causes scientists are researching is the role played by pesticides, and particularly a class known as neonicotinoids, which are often applied to crops. Pesticides are absorbed by plant tissues and then transferred to pollen and nectar. Bees, used to pollinate many different types of crops in the U.S., exhibit a wide range of sensitivities to the neonicotinoids, the report said.” [WSJ]

No one tell them about the Agenda 21 special forces amassing off the coast of Florida: “It didn’t take long for a conservative blog to connect the U.S. military’s upcoming ‘Jade Helm 15’ training exercise to President Barack Obama’s order Monday that banned certain military-grade equipment from being given to local law enforcement agencies. Michele Hickford, the editor-in-chief of former Rep. Allen West’s (R-FL) website, noted the timing of the President’s order and the military exercise, which some people believe is a cover for the implementation of martial law, in a blog post published Monday.” [TPM’s Catherine Thompson]

STENY HOYER SUPPORTS STENY HOYER BEING ELECTED DEMOCRATIC LEADER – He also supports that donation his leadership PAC just made to your reelection campaign. *wink* Bridget Bowman: “House Minority Whip Steny H. Hoyer, D-Md., agreed Tuesday morning that congressional salaries should increase. Rep. Alcee L. Hastings, D-Fla., made the case for a lawmaker pay raise during a Rules Committee meeting Monday night, arguing that the high cost of living in the District of Columbia will lead to a situation where only wealthy people can afford to serve in Congress. ‘I agree with Mr. Hastings,’ Hoyer said in his weekly pen-and-pad briefing with reporters Tuesday morning. He echoed Hastings’ argument, noting that the current salary “dictates the only people who can serve are the rich. I don’t think that’s what the Founding Fathers had in mind.’ … Members of Congress earn an average annual salary of $174,000. In April 2014, then-Rep. James P. Moran made headlines by making a similar argument for a pay raise.” [Roll Call]

ALAN GRAYSON IS ONE CLASSY GUY – No word on when he and Scott DesJarlais will form the “Women! Am I right?” Caucus, but we suspect it will be soon. Jesse Byrnes: “The saga between Rep. Alan Grayson (D-Fla.) and his estranged wife took another turn after an agreement on terms for their divorce fell apart. ‘I’ll sum it up for you: Gold diggers gotta dig. That’s all I gotta say,’ he told local ABC affiliate WFTV on Monday after leaving the courtroom, accusing Lolita Grayson of reneging on an agreement. His estranged wife of 25 years, Lolita, filed for divorce early last year. The House member and former telecom company co-founder has sought an annulment on the basis of bigamy, and they appeared to reach terms last month on an annulment, which would not require equal division of $30 million in assets.” [The Hill]

DAVID BROOKS CHAMPIONED AN AVOIDABLE WAR THAT LEFT 200,000 PEOPLE DEAD, BUT IT’S COOL BECAUSE HE NOW HAS A SERENE UNDERSTANDING OF HUMAN FALLIBILITY AND A BOOK ABOUT MORALITY THAT YOU SHOULD BUY AND PONDER WHILE ON THE ACELA – In terms of an Iraq war booster shamelessly fusing his record with a book promotion, this is almost as bad as “Big Russ and Me: Why My Dad Didn’t Mind My Softball Interview With Dick Cheney.” Brooks: “The Iraq war error reminds us of the need for epistemological modesty. We don’t know much about the world, and much of our information is wrong. A successful president has to make decisions while radiating hesitancy, staying open-minded in the face of new evidence, not falling into the traps that afflict those who possess excessive self-confidence….These are all data points in a larger education.” [Times]

Mikey loves it, naturally: “PLAYBOOK FACTS OF LIFE: Presidential candidates talking about Iraq, rather than parsing the question, might want to take a page from Brooks and focus their answers on: ‘Here’s what we learned … ‘” [Politico]

Chait summarizes the problem underlying the whole debate: “This is how the dodge works. Step 1: Prevent a Senate report from looking into whether the administration lied. Step 2: Ignore the existence of the report that did show the administration lied. Step 3: Pretend that an intelligence failure and a deliberate effort to cook the intelligence are mutually exclusive. It was a mistake, therefore it could not have also been a crime.” [NY Mag]

BECAUSE YOU’VE READ THIS FAR – Here’s a baby panda.

CLAIRE MCCASKILL DONE WITH ‘GAME OF THRONES’“Claire McCaskill says she wants to keep America safe, but if she can’t predict that there will be gratuitous rape scenes in ‘Game of Thrones,’ how can she predict when Iran will get the bomb?” Igor Bobic: “The Missouri Democrat, who often personally opines on newsy topics via her Twitter account, on Tuesday sounded off against a particularly brutal scene in the latest episode of “Game of Thrones,” HBO’s TV adaptation of the fantasy book series ‘A Song of Ice and Fire.’ ‘Ok, I’m done Game of Thrones.Water Garden, stupid.Gratuitous rape scene disgusting and unacceptable.It was a rocky ride that just ended,’ [she tweeted]. Fans of the series erupted in outrage on Sunday after young Sansa Stark, one of the show’s few remaining beloved protagonists, was raped by her new husband, Ramsay Bolton, a psychopath who has an affinity for skinning people alive. The ‘Black Wedding,’ as it is being called by fans online, never occurred in the books — Sansa’s friend is subjected to Ramsay’s torment instead.” [HuffPost]

COMFORT FOOD

– Navy’s humongous new gun was made by Bae Systems. Make of that what you will.

– A scene from “Bloodsport” transformed into a Mentos commercial.

– Voice actor ably offers his services to replace Harry Shearer’s replacement

TWITTERAMA

@aedwardslevy: Idea: compile favorability ratings for literally every human being in America

@jackshafer: This week’s journalistic rediscovery: biker gangs.

@IgorBobic: INBOX: What the Gyrocopter Pilot’s Return to DC Means for 2016

Got something to add? Send tips/quotes/stories/photos/events/fundraisers/job movement/juicy miscellanea to Eliot Nelson (eliot@huffingtonpost.com) or Arthur Delaney (arthur@huffingtonpost.com). Follow us on Twitter @HuffPostHill (twitter.com/HuffPostHill). Sign up here: http://huff.to/an2k2e

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

They Don't Want to Hear It

“Each step of the officers’ story defies credibility… flagrant misconduct… evasive and contradictory testimony… questionable, problematic testimony… tailored to overcome constitutional objection… complete fabrication…… patently incredible testimony… one of the most blatant cases of perjury I’ve seen… I hope you won’t darken my courtroom with this police officer’s testimony again”.

These are actual quotes from judges across New York City courtrooms, after hearing police officers testify in “suppression hearings” in criminal cases. Yet, there is virtually never any follow up on such findings by anyone in authority. Prosecutors aren’t going to report the findings, since they’ve implicitly endorsed the testimony by putting the officers on the stand. The NYPD doesn’t monitor such findings, as they don’t want to know. The courts don’t report their results outside of the case itself- there’s no political upside to calling out the cops. In fact, judges often go out of their way to express how much it pains them to have to do it. Thus an excellent tool for disciplining bad cops goes completely ignored.

Suppression hearings take place in criminal cases before trials, and are used to weigh the constitutionality of certain police actions in searches and seizures, or in interrogations, or in lineups. At such hearings, the prosecutor generally presents police officer witnesses to testify about how they got their evidence. The testimony is subject to cross examination by a defense attorney, and both sides are entitled to make their arguments to a judge.

The great majority of the time judges find the officers who testify to be credible, and that the evidence was obtained constitutionally. Thus, it is important and notable on the rare occasions when judges find the cops’ actions unconstitutional, or that the cops lied on the stand, or both. There should absolutely be a formal reporting mechanism, for the NYPD brass (and other municipalities across the country) to find out when judges have called their cops out on bad searches and perjury.

The idea that civil lawsuits should be at least somewhat weighed in evaluating cops’ performance is finally gaining traction in municipalities across the country. But the results of suppression hearings are even more reliable indicators than lawsuit settlements since, unlike lawsuit settlements, the testimony in hearings has been tested in open court, under oath. At my firm, we have collected hundreds of pages of suppression findings that go against the cops. But we’re apparently the only ones.

The tools for correcting this are not hiding- they are in plain view, available to anyone with a law journal subscription. For the price of a stamp, I’ll gladly send the police commissioner my collection of judicial findings, and every other civil rights lawyer I know would do the same. In what other business would the bosses deliberately avoid written, reliable evaluations of their employees’ performance? What other business would ignore or tolerate formal findings by federal judges that their employees perjured themselves to cover up job site misconduct? There is only one conclusion to be drawn; the authorities don’t want to know.

When evidence is suppressed, defendants guilty of very serious crimes may walk free. The cost to society can be high. Yet, the cost to the cop who engaged in the misconduct is almost always zero. The government protects bad cops, up and down the line. It doesn’t have to be that way, and could end tomorrow, with the political will.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Thriving After Cancer

The majority of the population has been touched by it, be it in their own household or enduring the suffering of someone they know or love–it is safe to say nearly everyone in the world has been affected by it. It’s the word no individual wants to hear–cancer.

We all know of somebody who has struggled through treatment and lost that heroic battle. Billions and billions of dollars have gone into research and today, due to new forms of medical treatment, many are surviving and thriving after cancer. I want to take you on a journey that began in 2005 and has helped nearly 700 women and their families find hope and get their lives back after cancer.

In March of 2005 my Wellness Director and I attended the annual International Health, Racquet & Sports Club Association (IHRSA) convention. We had the privilege of sitting in on a presentation by Julie Main, former IHRSA president, club owner and partner of three clubs in the Santa Barbara area. Her presentation centered around the Cancer Well Fit Program, which she put together with a hospital there. I was so impressed with Julie’s presentation that I asked permission to allow us to borrow and customize her template at The Claremont Club. Julie, being the wonderful person that she was, agreed, and in 2005 we started the Living Well After Cancer program in partnership with Pomona Valley Hospital Medical Center’s Robert & Beverly Lewis Family Cancer Care Center.

The Claremont Club hosts an annual Art of Giving charity event in partnership with PVHMC to absorb the cost of the program and one hundred percent of the net proceeds go directly to LWAC. Our complimentary 13-week program emphasizes activity-based therapy and consists of a support group, cardio and strength training, Pilates, yoga, oncology massage, and nutrition and cooking classes. Participants meet twice a week and are encouraged to use the club as often as they wish. Complimentary childcare is offered if needed. They go through an initial assessment and post assessment at the end of the program that measures quality of life outcomes implementing the concept of Exercise as Medicine. Seeing the transformation after 13 weeks–regained strength, flexibility, confidence and self-esteem–is extraordinarily rewarding and has changed all of our lives.

What became crystal clear to us during our initial run of the program was that the effects of cancer extended beyond the person who had it–it affected the entire family. Boys and girls at home were terrified of losing a parent. They were not interacting with their friends at school; they were withdrawing and having trouble concentrating and doing their homework. Immediately we knew it was essential to open up the club to the entire family to give them all some time to “get away” from cancer and have some fun.

The extensive success of this program prompted us to start a program for children and young adults affected by cancer. Our Pediatric Cancer Program works with youth ages five to 18 and runs for one full year. The younger children are involved with fun activities in our childcare department, including all 11 weeks of our summer camps and field trips, our kids’ Friday Night Out program and all social activities. These children are encouraged to bring a friend to attend the program with them for the entire year. Young adults work with cardio and strength conditioning exercises. We have also put together a program for the parents of participants. We are in our third week of the program and the input we are getting from both the kids and their parents is simply heartwarming.

We are currently working with several medical physicians and clinicians at multiple hospitals on a Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) grant application that if funded will study the benefits of exercise on children affected by cancer.

Is it possible to thrive after cancer? Watch the video below and decide for yourself.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.