California Drought: Should a Landscaping Business Be Allowed to Reap Huge Profits on the Turf Rebate Program?

As a landscaper that has been working with the Turf Rebate Program (#cashforgrass) since the program’s inception, I have seen some changes in the last year that I don’t think are for the better.

One big problem that I have seen is landscaping companies that are cashing in on the rebate program. They install landscapes at a fraction of the cost of the rebate check and rake in huge profits.

Should the rebate program allow this to happen? Was this really the intention?

As a business person, I am certainly interested in making a profit. However, the program is being used so that businesses can make 50 percent or more in profit. How is this happening? Because the homeowner is told that they are getting “free” landscaping. When you pay for something — actually taking out a checkbook, credit card or cash you see how much money is going out and I think are more likely to really look at what you are getting for the money.

The Metropolitan Water District is going to be looking at putting more money into the rebate program in the next week. The money has been used up with so many rebate applications in the last month.There are no more applications being approved at the moment, so the program is on hold.

Here are my ideas as someone that as worked with the program for many years. Implementing these changes would help to get the program back to what it was actually intended to do:

1. Do not allow contractors or businesses to submit the applications or receive the checks.

This way the homeowner will actually be aware of how much in rebate they are receiving. They will then know how much they are really paying to have this landscaping done. When they see that the check will be for example $4,000, I would hope they will question if they will be getting a $4,000 project.

2. The rebate restrictions should limit the amount of mulch or gravel used.

As a landscaper, I know this is an easy way to cut a budget. This is what the companies are doing to make huge profits — make most of the landscape gravel or mulch. In addition,I do worry about the amount of gravel that is being put down and how it is heating up our cities even more.

3. The rebate requirements should be changed to 40 percent planted at time of installation — not at maturity.

Another way that you can really increase your profit as a landscaper is to use small plants. In many of these installations I have seen four-inch plants used. Right now, the requirement is 40 percent of the turf area must be planted, but at the maturity of the plants. Changing that to 40 percent of the turf area at installation must be planted, not at maturity would be a much better requirement. There may be some landscapers that disagree with me, and that this will mean it is over planted — but pruning can be done and this is a much better alternative than yards with mostly gravel.

4. If a landscaper is doing the project an invoice with costs should be submitted with the final rebate application.

This is done for synthetic turf, so implement it for the landscaping part as well. This will really help to curb the large profits on these installations.

5. Give some guidance to homeowners on how much they should expect to pay for a project and reasonable profits that landscaper installers should make.

I do realize that this is a difficult one. But because of the nature of this particular program I think that some guidelines need to be in place so that businesses are not reaping in huge profits on this unreasonably.

I do fully expect to get a lot of negative comments from the companies that have been making a lot of money on this program. No, my motivation isn’t for us to get more business, we have been very busy and still are. My motivation is to have the rebate used as I think it was intended. Replace your water-demanding lawn with an attractive, environmentally friendly garden; this can be done by a landscaper who makes a reasonable profit and does designs that are specific to each different home or business. Can it be done by someone that installs only a few plants and a truckload of gravel? I don’t think so. I am concerned that the decisions we make now will affect how California gardens will look in 10 year. So how we make this transition from grass to low water gardens is critical.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Missouri Bus Driver Fired For Telling Little Girl She's Gay, Will Burn In Hell

A little girl couldn’t help but cry while recounting the story of a bus driver who told her she was gay and would burn in hell.

Maurissa Rushing, 11, was riding the bus to school in Kansas City, Missouri, when she was confronted by the driver, Fox4KC reports.

According to the fifth-grader, she was playing a game with her friend that involved touching each other’s arms. This was apparently too intimate for the driver, who brought the girls to the back of the bus after dropping off other students. The driver then said the two girls were gay.

“She said that we are gonna burn in hell real bad,” Maurissa told the station. “I didn’t expect it to happen.”

The student reported what happened to administrators. The bus company, First Student, fired the driver, who has not been identified.

The girl’s parents are now considering a lawsuit against the company, according to Raw Story. First Student officials said they are investigating the incident internally.

“She’s just been the most horrible bus driver I’ve ever had,” Maurissa said.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

The Best Espadrilles You Need On Your Feet This Summer

espadrilles

Who would’ve thought that the espadrille, a jute-soled shoe that was originally worn by the King of Aragon’s infantry, would reach the heights of fashion icon status? Lucky for us, these shoes have come a long way since the 13th century.

Fast forward to the 1940s, when the utilitarian sandals got a glamorous makeover and were spotted on some of Hollywood’s biggest stars, including Lauren Bacall and Rita Hayworth.

These days you can’t walk a block (or a boardwalk) in the summertime without seeing someone sporting a pair of espadrilles. The signature rope bottoms are being put on sneakers, heels and more.

In celebration of espadrille season, we’ve hand selected a few — all under $300 — that will certainly put some pep in your step this season.

Flat Espadrilles

Espadrille: Flats

Top row: Proenza Schouler slingback espadrilles, $295; Tory Burch espadrilles, $95; Loeffler Randall “Mara” espadrilles, $195.
Middle row: Dolce Vita “Genivee” espadrilles, $120; Circus By Sam Edelman “Brandon” espadrilles, $110; Vince Camuto “Arabell” espadrilles, $79.
Bottom row: Topshop “Kitten” espadrilles, $75; Soludos “Lace-Up” espadrilles, $30; Go Jane “Nautical Stripes” espadrilles, $16.

Heeled Espadrilles

Espadrille: Heels

Top row: Via Spiga “Ralina Tie” espadrilles, $250; UGG Australia “Atasha” espadrilles, $100; Castañer Costance wedge espadrilles, $302.
Middle row: Charlotte Russe “Qupid” espadrilles, $38; Paloma Barcelo wedge espadrilles, $257; Tory Burch “Lilah” espadrilles, $210.
Bottom row: H&M wedge espadrilles, $39; CiCi Hot espadrilles, $15; Topshop “Leap” espadrilles, $90.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

6 Questions to Ask Before Moving in With Your Partner

There are some strong opinions and views out there when it comes to living together before marriage. There is the group who tends to think that moving in must happen before marriage in order to have a “practice run” so you know what you’re committing to.

On the other hand, there’s the group of people who think it’s a bad idea and may believe in the “cohabitation effect,” which basically states that couple who cohabit before marriage tend to be less satisfied in their marriages.

Now, I’m not really here to argue one or the other by any means, but I am here to encourage people to really think things through before making this decision. In my mind, what determines the relationship success doesn’t merely come from the simple decision of moving in together or not. Rather, it comes from what the couple thinks about and openly communicates prior to making the decision.

Here are five questions you should be asking before moving in with your partner:

1. Why are we moving in together right now? Is it due to convenience and to save money on rent? Is it just because all of your friends are moving in with their partners? Or is it because it feels like your are truly both ready to take the relationship to the next level?

Frankly, doing it just to save some money each month or just because “everyone else is” isn’t really a good and solid reason. Be sure that you are both ready for it. Be sure that your relationship is stable enough to handle the challenges that come up in living together.

Ultimately, trust your gut. If you feel like its being rushed for whatever reason, put it off. It’s always better to take it slow and be sure of it then to move quickly and regret it later.

2. What is your view of marriage and your partner’s view? Have you both talked about marriage and shared your thoughts on the subject with one another? If you haven’t done this yet and you’re thinking about living together, you better discuss it to make sure you’re both on the same page.

That being said, even when you are living together already, I think it’s important to discuss one another’s thoughts on the subject for a “check in” to see where the two of you are at. I think this is important because one person may really be wanting to get married, but the other isn’t up for it due to divorce history, beliefs the relationship dynamic or other reasons.

Having regular, open communication about it is going to be helpful in keeping one another’s thoughts and feelings out in the open and avoid any hidden inner resentments getting built up.

3. What’s your view and your partner’s view on having children? Just as it’s critically important to discuss one another’s views on saying “I do,” it’s also important that both people share their thoughts on having children. Do you both want to have children, or do neither of you want children? Does one of you want children and the other doesn’t? Are one or both of you kind of on the fence?

Regardless of where you are both at, be sure to discuss it regularly to check-in, because you may have one view or opinion the one day and then it changes a few weeks or months later. Talking about it often helps both people understand where the other is at.

4. Who is going to pay for what? When living together when not married, there’s several things to consider how it the money situation will be split up: Who is sending in the check each month for rent? Who is in charge of utilities? Who is going to buy groceries and when? Who is paying for dinners when you go out to eat? Who is going to buy that extra piece of furniture that you’re going to need?

5. How will chores and cleaning be divided? It is important to have the discussion about how the housework will be divided. Who is going to clean the bathroom? Who is going to vacuum? Who is going to take the trash out? Who is going to cook? Is each person going to be assigned certain tasks or will it be on a rotation?

When it comes to dividing out housework, I don’t think there is one “one size fits all” method. I think what a lot of it boils down to is discussing each others views and opinions on how to organize the housework and create something that works equally well for both people.

6. What will happen if we break up? In a world where pre-nups are virtually expected in getting married now if a divorce ever happens, it is also important to have some kind of plan in place for what to do if the two of you breakup while living together. Who gets the TV? Who gets that new crockpot you both purchased?

Make sure that you both have a clear understanding as to whose stuff is what. Ideally, write it down. That way, there won’t be any extra conflicts if that unfortunate event does happen.

Ultimately, remember: When it comes to moving in together, you both have to make a conscious choice to make it work. Be sure that you both think things through and openly discuss any issues.

2015-05-18-1431915174-1135130-MovingIn.jpg

Click to Tweet: When moving in together, you have to be sure that both people are making a conscious choice and having open communication. via @jenilyn8705

In the comments below, share with me one thing that you think is important to discuss before moving in together.

Jennifer is a self and relationship coach and the founder of JenniferTwardowski.com. She helps women worldwide create fulfilling relationships with both themselves and others so they can live happy and joyful lives. Click here for her Free Self and Relationship Healing Meditation and weekly blog updates. To learn about how you can work with her, click here.

Connect with her on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram!

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Alex Rodriguez in 2015

Alex Rodriguez’s return from a one year suspension has been one of the most intriguing stories of the 2015 baseball season. Rodriguez has assumed the role of full time DH for the New York Yankees and has immediately become one of the best hitters on that team. His OPS+ of 152, 10 home runs and 19 walks are the second highest on the Yankees. Rodriguez has also found himself in the middle of another controversy, albeit this time not one of his own making. The Yankee ownership has balked at paying Rodriguez a bonus, for which they are contractually obligated, for hitting his 660th home run, tying Willie Mays on the all time home run list.

While Rodriguez exploits with the bat have been impressive, his success in winning back the affection of Yankee fans, and even some fans who hate that team, has been even more impressive. Rodriguez has learned that clashing with, and showing up, the Steinbrenner brothers is something that many baseball fans appreciate. For Yankee haters in particular, Rodriguez’s success this year, and the embarrassment that success has caused the Yankee management, is probably very dissonant.

Rodriguez’s 2015 season is also significant because it is another strange new chapter in baseball’s steroid era. Although dozens of players were involved with PED abuse in the years from roughly 1994-2010, the three biggest names associated with PED use from that era were Barry Bonds, Roger Clemens and Rodriguez. These three were among the very best players of the postwar era, and if PED use is not held against them, probably the three best players of the last 40 years. Bonds’s WAR of 162 is the highest during that period, followed by Clemens at 139 and then Rodriguez at 117.

Although they all have impressive numbers, all three of those players have been vilified by MLB and most fans. Their extraordinary numbers are viewed as inflated by PED use, despite playing in an era when PED use was extremely widespread, meaning they played against players who were also juicing, as well as some evidence that PED use does not influence performance as much as widely assumed. In recent years these three players have born much of the brunt of steroid related anger. Clemens and Bonds both retired after the 2007 season, but after three years on the Hall of Fame ballot, neither has received even 40% of the votes. 75% is needed to be elected to the Hall of Fame. Rodriguez was, until this year, broadly disliked by fans, even by Yankee fans. He was constantly derided as a steroid uses, called names like “A-Roid,” and in New York often described as not a true Yankee-whatever that means.

Not only did Rodriguez miss all of 2014, but from 2010-2012 was at best an above average, but not star level player. In an injury shortened 2013, however, Rodriguez was terrible, hitting .244 with only seven home runs in 181 plate appearances. Rodriguez is now on pace for his best season since 2008, when he was 32 years old. Rodriguez strong 2015, assuming he continues to hit for the rest of the year, will force fans and writers to rethink much of what they think they know about PED use.

Essentially given the numbers he is putting up, there are two possible conclusions. Either Rodriguez is back on PEDs, which would be an extraordinary stupid decision by the controversial slugger, or he is as good a hitter as many thought he was before he was linked to PED use. If the former is found to be true, Rodriguez would probably be banned from baseball for life and take his place as one of the most hated figures in American sports. Rodriguez knows that, so it is unlikely he would take such a foolish risk.

If, as is more likely, Rodriguez is not back on PEDs, but is simply a great hitter who has worked hard at his craft for most of his life, then things are different. If this is is the case, then the decisions by Bonds, Rodriguez, Clemens and so many others to break the rules and use PEDs were still mistakes, but should not cloud our awareness of just how good those players were. If a 39 year old, PED free Rodriguez, after a year without playing, can still hit this well, that should be taken as evidence that he is as good a player as his numbers suggest. It also forces thoughtful fans to rethink their dismissals of Roger Clemens, Barry Bonds and others. Someday in the not too distant future, Clemens and Bonds may make it to the Hall of Fame. If that happens, they will owe Alex Rodriguez and his 2015 season, just a little gratitude.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Tavis Smiley: My Conversation With David Brooks on 'The Road to Character'

Tonight, I’m joined by New York Times Op-Ed columnist David Brooks, author of the #1 best-selling text, The Road to Character. In the book, Brooks explores how some of history’s most influential figures built their strong inner characters, and what essential values they possessed that should be emphasized in today’s world.

In the clip below, he explains why the virtues discussed in his book transcend political affiliation.

For more of our conversation, be sure to tune in to Tavis Smiley on PBS. Check our website for your local TV listings: www.pbs.org/tavis.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

The 'Mad Men' Finale: It's the Real (No)Thing

I’m sure I wasn’t alone in fearing that the Mad Men finale would confound and frustrate the way the Sopranos finale did, leaving us in the dark (literally) as to the fates of the characters who’d been rendered so beautifully and in such a complicated manner over the years that we had come to see them as real people, almost; at least we spoke of them as if we did (cough, okay, turns head slightly away, I did).

As it turned out, AMC’s Mad Men finale, was filled with plot twists and payoffs. Yet, it’s final moments, which consisted of a cut from Don’s enlightened-yogi smile to an iconic Coca Cola jingle, imparted a nearly identical lesson as the final moments of the Sopranos final episode: life will go on, and people don’t really change; thus, we can guess that the unwritten future of our favorite fictional characters will end up looking – in all probability – a lot like their past.

Certainly, on a superficial level, we can say that all of the major Mad Men characters journeyed forth through significant life changes. Peggy went from secretary to star executive. Pete got married and had a baby girl, got divorced and moved to California and back, all while losing his hair and bettering his career. Don went from married suburbanite to Park Avenue player. Roger went from name-partner at Sterling Cooper to cartoon-ish figurehead at McCann, along the way ditching his first wife for his secretary, taking LSD and partaking in the free-love offered by the decade. Betty began as the gaslit wife of a rogue advertising exec to the adored wife of a respectable political player. Joan went from head of the secretary pool to head of her own production company.

But as much as these characters gained scars, strength and wisdom through their journeys, none of them actually changed over the course of a decade. Not essentially. Not at their core. The Mad Men finale illustrated this existential reality by bringing the characters full circle to where they were in the very first episode.

Peggy

2015-05-18-1431967727-7152252-ExistentialPeggy.jpg

In the first episode of Mad Men, Peggy was an ambitious young secretary, prepared to do what it took to succeed, including sleeping with her boss. Lucky for her, Don rejected her and came to see talent in her that had to do with neither her body nor her typing skills. If Peggy expressed an interest in getting married, it was never with much enthusiasm. She seemed to drift passively into relationships and then drift out without much drama.

In the finale, Peggy remained true to how we met her – an ambitious still-young advertising executive, prepared to do what it takes to succeed, which in the finale meant putting her ego aside and resolving to battle through the McCann Erickson bureaucracy. Peggy also remained fairly apathetic to the prospect of romance. She said she never thought of Stan. Yet a moment after he professed his love for her, she said she loved him too. So for now, Peggy has found love. Will it last? Does it matter? If it doesn’t last, don’t we know what will happen next? Peggy will go on and keep striving in her career and accepting love if it happens.

Joan
2015-05-18-1431967760-4601316-ExistentialJoan.jpg

When we first met Joan, she was the boss of all the secretaries and the provocatively-dressed sexpot who was sleeping with the married and much-older Roger Sterling. Joan implied that she was looking for a husband, but her relationship with Roger belied her ambivalence. When Joan did eventually marry, it was to a rapey boor, and the marriage rapidly failed; although Joan’s taste in men was questionable, her unwillingness to take abuse was not negotiable. Over the course of the series, we saw that Joan was willing to use her body to get ahead at work – but as it turned out, only where the opportunity was worth it to her. Thus, it was acceptable to Joan to sleep with a client in order to become a partner, but as we later discovered, it was not acceptable for her to sleep with her new boss at McCann in order to merely keep her job.

In the finale, Joan was still Joan. Getting involved with Richard was classic Joan. Wanting to have a fulfilling career was classic Joan. And ditching the prince when it became obvious that he was a controlling jerk was also classic Joan. Will her business be a success? Of course it will – Joan will use her body and her brain to make sure of it. And when a man comes along who is strong enough to capture Joan’s heart, he had better be kind and decent, or he’ll be dismissed like the ones who came before.

Roger
2015-05-18-1431967805-3812812-ExistentialRoger.jpg

At the outset of the series, Roger was a wealthy philanderer. At the end of the series, Roger remained a wealthy philanderer. Yes, in the finale, he is engaged to marry Marie Calvet, Megan Draper’s mom. But at the bistro in the finale, Marie makes it clear that she knows that Roger will never change. She expects a pretty young secretary in a very short skirt to tempt him, and she expects that he will stray. Yet she’s mature enough to accept it, French enough to laugh about it, and crazy enough to agree to marry Roger anyway. Basically, Roger has married his first wife all over again, only this time, the wife knows what she is getting into before she says “I do.” Will that make a difference? Perhaps. Perhaps not. Either way, Roger will remain the wealthy philanderer that he’s always been.

As for his career, yes, Roger began as the head of Sterling Cooper, and he was productive back then. By the series finale, Roger is nothing more than a figurehead with a four-year contract. But does this change who Roger is? For Roger, who came into advertising independently wealthy, business seemed more of a hobby than a driving force. And whether the hobby consisted of deal-making or drink-making, as long as he has an office to go to, he’s still the Roger we met on day one.

Pete
2015-05-18-1431967842-9742137-ExistentialPete.jpg

Pete was introduced to us as smarmy, ambitious, lucky to have a job in sales given the his rudimentary people skills and lucky to have the love of Trudy, his then-fiance and later wife (and ex-wife), who was Pete’s greatest asset when it came to closing with clients. But Pete’s luck wasn’t without limits. His affair with Peggy resulted in a baby boy he never got to meet. His clumsy attempt to philander his way through his marriage’s dull moments – as Don and Roger did so deftly most of the time – resulted in humiliation and divorce.

Finale-Pete was really just a more grown-up version of Pilot-Pete. Pete was still smarmy, ambitious and lucky. And Pete was still smart enough to know that Trudy was and always would be his greatest asset. And finally, Pete quietly accepted the karmic punishment for his good fortune – in landing the Lear job, which he hadn’t been seeking and for which he didn’t even show up for his interiew, and for getting Trudy and his daughter Tami back. That punishment was leaving New York City and having to live in Wichita. Different landscape, but same Pete.

Betty
2015-05-18-1431967882-2962361-ExistentialBetty.jpg

Betty spent most of the Pilot unseen. When we did meet her, she was the beautiful suburban wife of the dashing, cosmopolitan Don Draper. If Betty suspected Don’s infidelities, she pretended otherwise. When Don sensed that Betty was beginning to sniff out his secrets, he sent her to a shrink and had her doubting her sanity. When Betty realized that Don wasn’t who he made himself out to be, she didn’t stay for the drama. She moved on. Betty was never a model mother, but she was present. She cooked, she cleaned, she was reliable, and she was a mother bear with a rifle and a dangling cigarette when the situation called for it.

In the finale, Betty is still beautiful, still suburban, and still a wife. She’s still not honest with herself or with her children. She’s still not particularly nurturing. Still unwilling to engage in drama of any kind, Betty has rejected treatment for her lung cancer and is growing sicker by the day, but she remains present and protective of her children, telling Don that he can’t come home because it would alarm the children. Still smoking, still vain, still facing away from Sally in the last moments in which we see her in the finale, Betty is every bit the Betty that we met in the first season of Mad Men.

Don

2015-05-18-1431967908-4487705-ExistentialDon.jpg

Don Draper was always looking to escape. He escaped his past as Dick Whitman by taking on the identity of Don Draper. He escaped his first marriage to Betty through his lies and his many affairs. He escaped his second marriage to Megan by sending her off to California and then essentially disappearing from her life. He escaped from his life on various occasions, so often, in fact, that his colleagues remarked in the finale that disappearing is “what Don does.”

But what Don Draper also does is come back.

Whether out of a sense of responsibility or a desire to escape from his escape, Don always comes back. So, in the final few episodes, Don is “on the road”, as he puts it. Ditching his lunch meeting, his contract with McCann and his weekend visits with his kids, Don was finally going to escape the guilt-ridden identity he had crafted to escape the shame-ridden identity into which he’d been born.

Except he realized that he couldn’t. He was still having nightmares about being outed as Dick Whitman; on the other hand, he couldn’t shake his “Don Draper” persona either. The realization that escape simply isn’t possible was nothing new for Don. It was a theme throughout the series. And it brought the series into the nebulous future as Don, finally settling into his new-agey yoga retreat smiles beatifically at what can only be his next “big idea”: I’d like to teach the world to sing in perfect harmony.

Finale-Don may have learned to cry. He may have learned to show empathy. He may have finally figured out that the young folk don’t really want his help, although they do like his money. But Don is really no different from the Don we met in the Pilot. Don escapes, and Don comes back. He’s a chronic Sisyphus, pushing the boulder up the hill and watching it roll back down.

Don escapes, and Don comes back. Now, if only Mad Men would come back. I for one would be thrilled to have another seven years to see these characters go on a journey that ultimately leaves them the same as when they began. Really, I would.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Your Human Resources Department Wants You To Know What Is And Is Not Okay Office Behavior

Can I smoke pot in the office? … No? Okay, but what if I really want to?

Today’s office environment can be a tough one to navigate. Offices are much more open and free form, leading some people to be perhaps a little too loose with their behavior. Above Average asked a human resources director to clarify just what types of behaviors are okay in an office setting.

Wearing pants to work? Yes. Wearing only pants to work? No.

Follow Huffington Post’s board LOL onPinterest.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Automatic Just Made The Connected Car Really Compelling

The original pitch for Automatic was simple: plug this thing into the port underneath your dashboard and keep track of everything from fuel economy to fault codes. Now it’s out with a new device, developer tools, and an app store that lets you pre-heat your house, log lap times, and even send a Yo.

Read more…




Kingston (and Other) Flash Storage Is Heavily Discounted Today

Amazon has put a variety of Kingston gear on sale today, and we’ve thrown in more storage deals for good measure. Stock up.

Read more…