Towards a better planet and a life of dignity for all

As we approach the second session of the United Nations Environment Assembly (UNEA), it is important to put into perspective the challenges facing the international community ahead of this crucial meeting and the fundamental goals that underpin it.

The gathering in Nairobi will be a part of a much broader global reflection. Its landmark precedents, such as the United Nations Sustainable Development Summit, have put the world on the road to making environmental sustainability key to human development and our efforts to end poverty and hunger.

At the threshold of this journey, which starts at UNEA, lies the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and its Sustainable Development Goals – a global cornerstone that marks a sharp turn in the international community’s course towards sustainable human development.

Evaluating accomplishments, measuring progress and quantifying pending objectives will be vital to the success of the Agenda 2030. The progress already made in recent years is enough to fill us with hope, but we cannot rest on our laurels, faced with the long list of unfinished tasks.

Poverty, inequality and exclusion continue to top the agendas of national governments and add complexity to planetary challenges. An abysmal distance still separates us from achieving a life of dignity for all; and every day the rapidly changing global dynamics adds new problems or exacerbates existing ones at a pace that far outstrips our ability to tackle them.

The unquestionable correlation between poverty and the environment obliges us to pay utmost attention to the role of environmental policies in tackling social inequality. Currently, the majority of people living in extreme poverty inhabit rural zones, where they rely on forests, natural resources and ecosystem services as their principal source of income. Paradoxically, global studies show that a vast proportion of these resources are subject to violent changes, degradation and unsustainable use, diminishing the capacity of ecosystems to satisfy the needs of peoples and nations.

Efforts to protect the environment are therefore also efforts to eradicate poverty. Loss of biodiversity, water scarcity, land-use changes and deforestation are not only a threat to nature, but also to the well-being of people. We must address these challenges if we are to achieve sustainable human development. To do this, we must move towards sustainable patterns of employment, production and consumption.

Neither hunger nor climate change will wait for us while we find solutions. Instead, we must take energetic, forceful decisions now if we are to turn the tide. It is time for ambitious proposals and audacious solutions. Now is the time to leave our comfort zones and accept our historic responsibility. It is the hour of new global paradigms, which will effectively change the direction towards a future that we all want.

In his report A life of dignity for all, United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon wrote that, with our actions to implement the 2030 Agenda, “multilateralism is being tested.” This is an extremely accurate statement: the year 2030 is poised to become a trial for humanity, at which the strength of our political will and our ability to overcome today’s challenges will be judged.

We have a mission to foster a new global partnership, which will harness humanity’s accumulated knowledge to build momentous agreements that will guarantee the well-being of future generations. To achieve this, we must integrate the economic, social and environmental sustainability dimensions of agreements that are broad enough to cover the entire international community, but flexible enough to apply to every corner of the world.

Improving public-private partnerships and citizen participation, fostering technological development and accessibility to innovation, strengthening international cooperation, mobilizing internal resources responsibly and driving better governance – these are the key ingredients of the global political debate that are essential to achieving the environmental dimension of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.

The seven cross-cutting thematic priorities of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) perfectly reflect the most urgent global issues and together constitute a guiding light for the construction of efficient environmental governance around the world. UNEA-2 offers us an opportunity to reflect on this and to agree on the steps necessary to realize the transformation we want. As we sit down at negotiating tables in Nairobi this week, a hope for a better planet and a life of dignity for us and for future generations will be our motivation.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

HuffPost Rise: What You Need To Know On May 24

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

Welcome to the HuffPost Rise Morning Newsbrief, a short wrap-up of the news to help you start your day.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Looking Back, The 'Thelma And Louise' Premieres Was SO 1991

On May 21, 1991, nobody had really heard of Thelma, Louise or Brad Pitt yet.

Now, 25 years later, they are all a part of the American cultural zeitgeist. Thelma and Louise represent independence (and how to drive a car off a cliff in style), and Pitt represents how to succeed as a ridiculously handsome person.

To celebrate “Thelma and Louise’s” 25th anniversary, we went through some photos from the film’s California and New York premieres and cannot get enough of Susan Sarandon’s Lite Brite dress, Geena Davis’s puffy shirt, and that crazy four-year period when Pitt and Juliette Lewis were soooo in love.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

How To Get That $1,000 Embroidered Dress You've Been Seeing For Under $100

So you saw embroidered dresses everywhere last summer, decided to hold off and now realize they are still a huge trend, so you want one? Us too. 

Ukrainian embroidered dresses are very popular, and if you’re thinking of investing in one, doing your research is key because they often carry massive price tags. 

A photo posted by Analuz (@lulu65lulu) on Jan 17, 2016 at 4:14am PST

Vyshyvanka, the colloquial term for Ukrainian embroidered shirts, have blown up in the past few months (in large part due to designers like Vita Kin and fashion bloggers like Leandra Medine). But these dresses can set you back upwards of a thousand dollars … ouch. 

But if you want to get a similar look, you’re in luck, because many fast-fashion stores are creating dresses with pretty embroidery. We’ve rounded up several options that all ring in under $100, so you’ll still be able to afford food this month. 

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Bloody Brawl Breaks Out Between NYPD And FDNY At Charity Football Game

It wasn’t these emergency service teams’ finest hour.

Fists flew when the FDNY took on the NYPD in a family friendly charity football game in New York City on Saturday.

The “Fun City Bowl” fracas at MCU Park on Coney Island was caught on camera:

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

Two brawls broke out in quick succession after a police officer executed what onlookers labeled a “vicious” tackle on a firefighter during the final minutes of the game, the New York Post reports.

One firefighter was escorted away with blood dripping down his face. 

“They hit our quarterback out of bounds, and that’s how things started,” said FDNY coach Steve Orr. “There were a lot of hotheads there.”

Freelance photographer Angel Zayas filmed the entire incident.

“I think one of the FDNY guys exchanged words with the NYPD player and then from there, I couldn’t see what was happening, I just saw the crowds come around the player,” Zayas told NBC New York. 

But the brawl ceased almost as quickly as it had started. “At the end, they were all talking, it was like water under the bridge,” Zayas added.

The NYPD won the game 29-13Police commissioner Bill Bratton did not allude to the fracas when he later congratulated his department’s players in a Twitter post.

The NYPD did, however, acknowledge the incident in a statement the department later issued.

Football is a competitive sport, whether it is the NFL Super Bowl or the annual NYPD-FDNY challenge. It is part of the spirit of the sport, but it all ends on the field,” it said.

It’s not the first time that sports teams from the two services have clashed.

Their hockey teams also brawled during a charity match at Nassau Coliseum on Long Island in 2014.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Obama Visits Hiroshima Amid Growing Risk of Nuclear War with China

2016-05-24-1464083834-5503461-image.jpeg
Japanese school children contemplate ground zero in Nagasaki.

A sitting US president who won the Nobel Peace Prize for his commitment to nuclear disarmament is preparing to visit Hiroshima. Mr. Obama is expected to visit privately with survivors of the atomic bombings and to make brief remarks after visiting a museum documenting the humanitarian consequences of nuclear war. Unfortunately, as the president ponders the past, his policies are increasing the risk that nuclear weapons may be used again in the future.

A new report from the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) concludes there is a troubling lack of urgency about the possibility that the United States and China could become involved in a military conflict that escalates rapidly and ends in a nuclear exchange. Both governments are deploying weapons and pursuing military strategies that make this more likely. Neither side is willing to invest anywhere near as much time and resources on diplomatic efforts to reduce the risk of war as they spend preparing to fight it.

The Pentagon plans to spend more than a trillion dollars upgrading its nuclear forces. This includes a new nuclear cruise missile the United States plans to make available for use against targets in China during a future military conflict. Concerns about China contributed to a recent decision by both houses of Congress to authorize a massive expansion of the US national missile defense program. New US investments in military space technology aim to counter perceived Chinese threats to US dominance in outer space. US research and development of conventional precision strike weapons could encourage US decision-makers to attempt a preemptive strike targeting China’s nuclear forces in the event of a major military confrontation.

China plans to counter US technical advances by increasing the number and diversifying the basing modes of its nuclear-capable missiles. Chinese military strategists are considering placing their nuclear forces on high alert so they can be launched on warning of an incoming US nuclear attack. Chinese research, development and testing of anti-satellite weapons, missile defenses and hypersonic guide vehicles are aimed at eroding what Chinese military planners see as a US effort to contain China and restrict its development.

Both sides appear willing to initiate a military conflict over contentious disputes. For example, the United States recently warned China it would risk military escalation to prevent or stop a proposed Chinese island reclamation project in the Scarborough Shoal. Chinese authorities reportedly responded by committing to move ahead with the project anyway. This particular contest of wills is part of a steadily increasing number of unresolved diplomatic spats that have escalated to the level of overt military posturing reminiscent of U.S.¬-Soviet jousting during the Cold War.

Chinese military planners believe they can prosecute a large-scale conventional military conflict with the Unites States without the threat of nuclear escalation. They believe no nation, including the United States, would risk nuclear retaliation by resorting to a first use of nuclear weapons. US military planners believe they can threaten “limited” nuclear attacks against China if a military conflict escalates to a level where the United States or its military bases in allied Asian countries come under Chinese conventional attack. US decision-makers think their Chinese counterparts would never risk launching a retaliatory nuclear strike against the United States or its allies in response to a limited US nuclear attack against Chinese military targets.

It is not difficult to imagine situations that could trigger an inadvertent or accidental nuclear escalation. For example, China’s leaders could underestimate US willingness to use nuclear weapons to stop a conventional war. US leaders could underestimate Chinese willingness to retaliate after a limited US nuclear attack. China could launch a retaliatory nuclear attack if the United States were to launch conventional missile strikes that China mistakenly believed were nuclear. The United States could make the same mistake. Equipment in the command and control network of either nation could be destroyed or malfunction, especially given the interest of both countries in anti-satellite weapons. Decision makers may not have timely access to accurate information in the fog of a conflict.

Compared to round-the-clock preparations for war involving tens of thousands of people and hundreds of billions of dollars in annual expenditures, a handful of US and Chinese diplomats meet for a few hours several times a year to discuss their respective policies on nuclear weapons, missile defenses, anti-satellite weapons and other advanced military technologies. These bilateral dialogues focus on how to manage the military competition between the United States and China rather than on how to resolve the disagreements both sides are attempting to settle with coercion rather than negotiation. The UCS report recommends the leaders of both governments address the growing risk of nuclear war with a greater sense of purpose.

Sadly, as the Nobel laureate and outgoing US president contemplates the horror of nuclear war, his advisors and his generals may be setting Asia up for a tragic reprise of the terrible suffering nuclear weapons caused at Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Let’s hope the next US administration is wiser, and more willing to learn from history rather than repeat it.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Let Us Count Some Reasons Why You Won't Want Will.i.am's New Headphones

Will.i.am has a chequered history of making pieces of consumer technology that nobody
really
wants
. Now you can add to that list a pair of Bluetooth headphones.

Read more…

MacBook Pro with OLED touch bar, 13-inch MacBook coming soon

macbook-800x420The refresh of the 12-inch MacBook last month, and the noticeable lack of new MacBook models, has had some scratching their heads over Apple’s vision for the notebook line. That confusion may soon give way to clarity in the next two quarters of the year. According to respected KGI analyst Ming-Chi Kuo, the second half of the year will not … Continue reading

Story of NASA's black female mathematicians gets made into a movie

Katherine Johnson received a Presidential Medal of Freedom in 2015 for her contribution to America’s Space Race, and soon more people will know what she did to deserve it. An upcoming book and movie both entitled Hidden Figures tell the story of NASA…

The new MacBook Pro could feature a Touch ID sensor and an OLED mini screen

macbook-key-depth Rumor has it that Apple is about to update the MacBook Pro with a retina display in the coming months. And according to well-informed analyst Ming-Chi Kuo from KGI Securities and 9to5mac, it should be much more than a specification bump.
The company wants to keep two screen sizes with a 13-inch model and a somewhat more powerful 15-inch model. But these laptops s Read More