Try Out These Noise-Cancelling Bluetooth Earbuds For $15

Mpow basically created
the cheap Bluetooth headphone market, and their noise-cancelling Wolverine models are marked down to $15 today with code PV62UJKU, the best price we’ve seen.

Read more…

Most Older Americans Now Say They Support Same-Sex Marriage

Nearly a year after the Supreme Court’s historical ruling on marriage equality, support for same-sex marriage among Americans age 65 and older is at all-time high. 

A 2016 Gallup poll found that 53 percent of Americans 65 and older say they believe same-sex marriages should be recognized, with the same legal rights as traditional marriages. Although it’s a 30-percent support drop from 18- to 29-year-olds, it’s the first time since Gallup first polled on the issue in 1996 that the majority of older Americans said they think same-sex marriage should be fully legal.

Forty-two percent of the same demographic said they supported same-sex marriage in 2014, up from 14 percent in January 1996. 

The rise in support among older Americans is consistent with the statistics across the board. The poll, which was based on telephone interviews conducted earlier this month with 1,025 adults, found that 61 percent of Americans said they supported same-sex marriages, a slight increase from 60 percent last year. 

Gallup analyst Justin McCarthy said he believed that the strong support for same-sex marriage across the U.S. will have a major impact on the 2016 presidential election. 

“Americans’ heightened approval of gay marriage this year makes the issue a fairly straightforward one for the remaining Democratic presidential candidates,” he wrote. “Not only do the vast majority of fellow Democrats agree with their stance, but they also have little to fear on the issue from the general electorate.”

While Republican presidential hopeful Donald Trump has a checkered history with the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) community, McCarthy believes that his party’s “tapering opposition” to marriage equality makes it “an ideal climate” for the GOP frontrunner. 

Pointing to Trump’s recent attendance at a same-sex wedding, he wrote, “This is a marked departure from his former primary rival, Ted Cruz, who said he’d never attend a gay wedding if invited.”

Head here to read more about the Gallup poll.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Google’s ATAP is bringing its Project Soli radar sensor to smartwatches and speakers

soli style Every year at I/O, Google’s ATAP division, which is responsible for turning some of the company’s crazier ideas into products, organizes its own small keynote. This year, the company offered updates on a number of projects, including Project Soli, its attempt at building a very small radar sensor that can translate hand movements into digital signals for building new user… Read More

Seth Rogen's Preacher Trailer Parody Is a Thing of Goofy Greatness

As anticipation builds ahead of Preacher’s premiere Sunday night on AMC, one of the guys responsible for getting the Garth Ennis comic adaptation on the air
just couldn’t contain his glee. Below, witness Seth Rogen’s ultimate DIY fanboy trailer parody—in which he plays every Preacher character (with some mannequin co-stars).

Read more…

Saying No to Hillary Is Saying Yes to 3 More Thomas's on the Supreme Court

Presumptive GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump made it almost official. He now has in his hip pocket the names of 11 hardline conservative judges and legal luminaries who he deems fit SCOTUS judges. The names supplied by the equally hardline conservative Heritage Foundation weren’t much a surprise.

At a town hall in last December, the month before the South Carolina primary, Trump didn’t hesitate when asked who his favorite High Court justice was. He named Clarence Thomas. Thomas was his guy on the court because he is “very strong and consistent.” Trump’s 11 names, then, are in keeping with his Thomas swoon.

Naming a High Court judge is the one issue that has ignited the greatest debate, furor and public warfare. The legal bloodbath would be even messier if “President” Trump plucked any one of the 11 names from the list as his SCOTUS choice. So the repeated question then is why would anyone play with fire with Trump and bulk at backing Clinton, the likely Democratic nominee?

The possibility of one, not to mention, the possibility of two or even three more Thomas clones on the High Court given the ages of the three court liberals should be more than enough incentive to insure that Trump never gets a chance to pull that list of names out of his pocket. Yet polls repeatedly show that a troubling percentage of left-leaning Democrats and progressive leaning independents say they won’t back Clinton no matter what.

One of the two stock retorts to shunning Clinton is to spit out the by now familiar epithets at her, Wall Street shill, corporate sell-out, war hawk and untrustworthy. The Hillary bashers convince themselves that there wouldn’t be a dime’s worth of difference between a Trump White House and a Clinton White House.

The other comeback is that “President” Trump would propel legions of protesters into the streets at every Trump turn. He would be relentlessly challenged every step of the way by Congressional Democrats, civil rights, liberties, environmental, and women groups. They would stop him dead in his tracks when he tries to shove his agenda through, and that first and foremost would mean an epic war against his effort to put another Thomas on the High Court.

The first rationale is, of course, patently absurd. Trump has made it perfectly clear that he would try to repeal the Affordable Care Act, totally scrap the Dodd-Frank financial industry regulations, do nothing to stop the further evisceration of the Voting Rights Act, cheer lead the NRA and avoid comprehensive gun control like the plague, wreak new miseries on undocumented workers and their children, and give a wink and nod license to ramp up anti-Muslim hysteria in the country. Clinton is the diametric opposite of this and trying to make the case against her as a Trump policy look alike is beyond laughable.

The other problem with the assumption that Trump can be easily stopped is there is no guarantee that Senate Democrats and progressive House Democrats would not still be in the minority in Congress. If that is the case, they would be at the mercy of a White House now in the hands of a fickle reactionary, and a Congress that would giddily aid and abet his most rightwing draconian initiatives and legislation.

That wouldn’t be all. Protest groups would have leverage only in the forces they could muster in the streets. But Trump and a Republican Majority Congress would be virtually immune to those protests since they did not rely on them to win or stay in office.

This makes the case for Clinton even more urgent even without Trump in the White House but with Congress in the GOP’s grip. She is the only one who could then stand deflect, derail, or at the least minimize the irreparable political carnage that the GOP would wreak if it kept the Senate and the House.

Now back to Trump and the Supreme Court. In decades past, many Democratic and Republican appointed justices scrapped party loyalties and based their legal decisions solely on the merit of the law, constitutional principles and the public good. Trump’s favorite judge, Thomas, has gone full steam in the other direction. He has blatantly rammed his strictest of strict constructionist ideology into every opinion he’s written and vote he’s cast on civil rights, police powers, corporate financial dealings, the death penalty, abortion, and voting rights. He has firmly carved out a granite like niche as one of the most reflexive, knee jerk, reactionary jurists to grace the court in decades.

Thomas punctuates that by being the court’s first openly public recluse and with rare exceptions refusing to utter a peep during any of the oral arguments before the court. But then there’s not much need since his votes are already guaranteed.

Saying no to Clinton is the most dangerous of dangerous propositions. It would say yes to the possibility of three more Thomas’s on the High Court.

Earl Ofari Hutchinson is an author and political analyst. His latest book is How “President” Trump will Govern (Amazon Kindle) He is an associate editor of New America Media. He is a weekly co-host of the Al Sharpton Show on Radio One. He is the host of the weekly Hutchinson Report on KPFK 90.7 FM Los Angeles and the Pacifica Network.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Google Jacquard Levi’s jacket will make fabric “smart.”

touchmeThis week the folks at Google’s Advanced Technology and Project group (aka ATAP) have announced their first Project Jacquard release. This is touch-sensitive material – textiles that can sense when your skin comes in contact with it. The first product that’ll be released by Levi’s with this technology inside is a Commuter Jacket for bicycle riders – and it’ll be … Continue reading

How a Freaky WWI Camouflage Trick Could Be Reworked For the 21st Century

During World War I, ships were painted in zebra stripes to deceive the enemy. The effectiveness of this “dazzle” camouflage was never quite clear, but a new study suggests that these zigzag patterns can be quite deceptive when they move.

Read more…

Sodium: The Sneaky Source of a Silent Killer

2016-05-20-1463751888-1657777-SaltwithSpoon000064058809_Large.jpg

You’ve heard it for years: Cut down on sodium. The more salt in your diet, the more problems for your body.

The science behind this could fill a library. The dangers of ignoring it could fill a morgue.

Chilling as that sounds, we know that too much sodium can cause high blood pressure, and we know that high blood pressure is a primary cause of heart disease and stroke, the two leading causes of death in the world. Nearly a billion people globally, and about 80 million American adults, have high blood pressure. If you’re not already in that group, be aware that 90 percent of us will develop this condition at some point in our lives. The really scary part is that millions of Americans have high blood pressure, but haven’t checked their BP, so they don’t even know it!

Sodium is sneaky, too. It goes way beyond the salt shaker. Nearly 80 percent of the salt we consume comes from some of the processed and prepared foods we buy at grocery stores and restaurants.

Fortunately, the outlook is encouraging. Making it possible for us to control the salt in our diets – and, thus, improve our health – is a priority for the people and organizations who can truly effect change.

In Washington, D.C., the Food and Drug Administration has asked the food industry to join together to voluntarily reduce sodium in processed products and restaurant foods. We applaud the FDA, the U.S. Department of Agriculture and others, including the Congress members who remain steadfast in their defense and support of sound nutrition policy.

Several major food companies have climbed aboard, too. We’ve seen announcements about plans to lower the amount of sodium in their products – and some already have done it.

To fully grasp why sodium control is such a crucial issue, let’s go over some basics.

Sodium is a mineral that’s essential for life. It helps your body control fluid balance, affects muscle function and nerve impulses. However, as is often the case, too much of a good thing can be a problem.

The average American consumes 3,400 milligrams of sodium per day. That’s more than double the 1,500 milligrams recommended by my organization, the American Heart Association. It’s also way above the maximum 2,300 milligrams recommended by our government in its 2015 Dietary Guidelines for Americans.

What happens when you consume too much sodium?

Water gets pulled into your blood vessels, raising the volume of blood flowing through those vessels. To put the science into everyday terms, imagine turning up the supply of water to your garden hose. The tube can handle it for a while, but over time the added pressure will cause the rubber to expand, thinning it out until eventually it can be damaged or even crack.

Switching back to the body, high blood pressure can damage your blood vessels so they can’t widen to provide all the blood flow you need. It can speed the buildup of plaque, which further blocks blood flow. It also forces the heart to work harder to pump blood through the body. And if that leads to heart failure or kidney failure, that can be a terrible outcome – one you certainly want to avoid.

Only about 11 percent of our sodium intake comes from salt we add while cooking or eating. About 12 percent comes naturally in foods. The rest? All added before the food ever gets to us. Sodium is used to add flavor and as a preservative, either to keep food safe, enhance the color or to give it a firmer texture. These are reasonable uses; again, the problem comes from too much of a good thing.

It’s also worth noting that evidence shows there are specific populations that should not lower sodium intake, such as those regularly working in extreme heat or suffering from a specific illness. Still, these are the exceptions to the rule, which we know to be that, in general, Americans need to reduce sodium consumption.

A survey conducted by the American Heart Association found that 75 percent of adults in the U.S. preferred less sodium in processed and restaurant foods. Major players in the food industry are among the many climbing aboard the bandwagon.

  • Within the last month, Nestle, Mars Food, Unilever and PepsiCo announced support of FDA’s plan for voluntary sodium targets.
  • Last year, General Mills announced that it already had cut up to 20 percent in many products. Domino’s, Schwan’s and Revolution Foods are among others moving in this direction. Aramark has committed to a 20 percent reduction by 2020.
  • Subway, which in 2011 was among the first major quick-serve restaurant company to voluntary cut back on sodium, continues to offer lower-salt sandwiches.

The biggest culprits in our diet may surprise you: bread and rolls; cold cuts and meats; pizza; poultry; soup; and sandwiches. After seeing such a list, you may not be surprised to learn that, just like adults, nine in 10 children get way too much sodium.

The American Heart Association is no lone drummer banging the anti-sodium beat. We’re part of a marching band that includes heavy hitters: the Department of Health and Human Services; the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; the World Health Organization; the American Medical Association; the American Academy of Pediatrics; the American College of Cardiology; the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics; the American Society of Nephrology; the American Society for Hypertension; the Pan American Health Organization; the Food and Agriculture Organization of the Americas; American Public Health Association; Institute of Medicine and more.

These organizations have studied what happens when people consume too much sodium and all concluded that we need to reduce salt to healthy levels.

This is not just a U.S. issue, either. In fact, as a country, we are late to the sodium-reduction movement. Our neighbors to the north and south — Canada and Mexico — are among the 50-plus countries that have adopted voluntary or mandatory reductions in the salt content of certain foods. The United Kingdom has been doing this for years.

So, why does opposition still exist? Why are people saying that all these big, prominent, science-based organizations are making too big a deal out of this?

I encourage you to investigate how and why they came to their conclusions. Feel free to study ours, too. I also recommend comparing the volume and breadth of people on each side of the fight. I believe you will come away ready to pledge to eat less salt and willing to lend your voice to the chorus seeking to change the way Americans think about and consume sodium.

We’re not saying the rise in sodium intake is the only reason why one in three Americans have high blood pressure, but we feel quite strongly that it’s a major reason for it.

The rise in our daily sodium intake and the massive amounts of sodium in our food supply also didn’t happen overnight. It’s taken years to get to this point.

All the American Heart Association, some leaders in the food industry and leading science-based organizations are saying is, let’s try going in the other direction to see what happens.

2016-05-20-1463746132-7805736-HuffPobannerFeb2016.jpg

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

First 3D-printed motorcycle built by Airbus

First 3D-printed motorcycle built by AirbusWe’re seeing 3D-printed versions of just about everything these days, from shoes and robots to even working cars, and now it’s the electric motorcycle’s turn. APWorks, a subsidiary of airplane-maker Airbus, has produced what it says is the world’s first 3D-printed motorcycle, complete with a total weight of just 35 kg (77 pounds). They’ve even come up with a fitting … Continue reading

The Difference Between RGB and CMYK, Explained

Anyone who has ever opened Photoshop has been met with the question of using RBG or CMYK at some point. These might seem like arbitrary options at first, but each represents a different approach to creating—and displaying—color. The distinction is explained in a new video from Express Cards

Read more…