Labyrinth ‘Ello Worm Slippers Will Guide Your Feet on The Proper Path

If you love the 1986 movie Labyrinth and need something to keep your feet warm, these cozy plush slippers should be perfect. They are based on that cute little worm from the movie. You know, the one that says “‘Ello” in the maze.

worm_slippers_1zoom in

As far as worms go, this little guy is adorable. He’ll keep your feet nice and toasty. They are “one size fits most adults up to size 12.” Even if they don’t fit, how could you not get these? They are cute as a button and will look great displayed in your home if not on your feet.

I admit, he’s kind of creepy too, but they will worm their way into your heart. They’re sold out most places, but it looks like ToyVault still has some for a slight premium of $54.99.

[via Fashionably Geek

Privacy guidance for drone operators issued by US agency

phantom drone The NTIA has published best practice privacy guidelines for the use of commercial and non-commercial drones to gather personally identifiable data. The guidance was agreed by all the various stakeholders involved, including drone companies, consumer privacy groups and news organizations. Read More

Kaley Cuoco 'Finally' Makes It Official With New Boyfriend Karl Cook

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

Spring is here, “The Big Bang Theory” got renewed for another season and Kaley Cuoco appears to have made things official with her boyfriend, Karl Cook. All is right in the world. 

The 30-year-old actress Instagrammed a photo of herself kissing Cook, with the caption “Finally” on Thursday. We’re just going to take this as a sign that these two are “finally” girlfriend and boyfriend. 

Finally

A photo posted by @normancook on May 19, 2016 at 10:41am PDT

Cuoco has made no secret that she’s moved on with Cook, as she often posts adorable photos of (and with!) the equestrian. 

Swear, he’s totally into me

A photo posted by @normancook on May 6, 2016 at 5:17pm PDT

blondes do have more fun 🙂 #sundaze

A photo posted by @normancook on Apr 24, 2016 at 12:39pm PDT

When bae wins its a good night for this girl

A photo posted by @normancook on Apr 9, 2016 at 6:58pm PDT

The actress, an avid horseback rider herself, recently gushed about her new love in an interview with “CBS This Morning,” telling the hosts, “I think the horse connection is special” and “He’s special.” 

Cuoco also opened up about her divorce from tennis pro Ryan Sweeting, whom she split with after nearly two years of marriage in 2015. 

You know what, I’m not ashamed of anything that happened,” Cuoco said. “I fall in love really hard. I go deep and that person is it for me. I love hard, and when it’s over, it’s over.” 

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Living Life On Purpose

Following, Arianna’s Thrive course I am now writing my book with naked intention and purpose. I had written many start-up and stop books before this course, they still sit inside my computer incomplete. I now believe these failed results were due to my running on empty for so long without awareness of the consequences of this.

The book I am now writing is called “EFT’s missing Links”- “Heart Centred Processes for Self Confidence and Healthy Independence”. My desire to write this came to me after becoming acutely aware that there was a huge need for simple self-help strategies. In the last two years, many clients between 20-30 have come to me struggling with their work stress. A large proportion of these young professionals were experiencing panic attacks and were unwilling to go down the purely medication route. It felt as if the Universe was telling me something important about their understandable needs.

In 1970s in my late 20s I too benefitted phenomenally from reading a self help book about natural childbirth. I found Erna Wrights methods were incredibly different as well as helpful for the birth of my fourth baby in 1975. I now know that her book actually taught me self-hypnosis. This life changing experien ce made me want to learn more about the mind body relationship. I studied psychology with the intention of inspiring others in various aspects of their lives. In 1980, I started my full time clinical practice. Since then I have found that combining hypnosis and EFT (Emotional Freedom Techniques) promotes self confidence, healthy independence and enhances clients ability to naturally welcome interdependence in their personal and professional lives.

These powerfully inspiring experiences have meant that I am passionate about spreading what I have learnt over 36 years in private practice. My intention is to give young professionals simple ways of how to really love their life now and in their future.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Longing for Desire

IMG_3847Most people are familiar with the heart-aching pain of grief. Most people can identify the empty thud of loneliness. Most people know when they’ve been pricked by the green-eyed monster of jealousy, or taken under the thick, gray blanket of shame. But how often do we talk about longing?

In the container of my virtual office, I hear about it many times a week:

I long for a baby.

I long for a partner.

I long for my mother.

I long for my father. 

I long for the parents I never had.

I long for my childhood.

I long for a house.

I long for community.

I long for a best friend.

I long for God (or spirit, connection to something higher, whatever term works for you).

I long for a different climate.

I long for a different city.

I long to be single.

I long to feel alive.

I long to feel in love.

I long to feel desire. 

What composes the hymn of longing? What notes comprise the sonata that stirs the soul like a great piece of music, rising up from the depths of oneself like a hand that commands our attention until we grab hold?

Until we decipher its code and learn its language, how to meet the longing often remains a mystery. Just as we must learn the difference between healthy grieving and intrusive pain, so we must learn to discern between root longing and secondary longing. Root longing calls our attention to a whole and real need inside that, when met, can point us toward a new direction or experience in life. Secondary longing contains whispers of a root longing that must be deciphered so that we don’t follow signs that point us in misguided direction.

For example, the longing for God (spirit, connection to higher self) is a root longing. When we feel that longing, there’s nothing to decipher or decode; we must simply listen and learn how to bring more of that connection into our lives. When my clients sit in church and describe the longing that arises as they listen to the music and gather in community, that’s a healthy, root longing that says, “This feeds my soul. I need more of this. Listen.”

The longing for father, on the other hand, is primarily a secondary longing. If you didn’t grow up with a healthy, loving, clear father-figure, the longing for father often arises during adulthood. This longing, when unexamined, can then lead a woman to seek relationships with older men as a way to try to fulfill the absence. This never works, of course, and often only leads to more longing. To break apart this secondary longing is to arrive at the core longing, which often contains a longing for God, and also a longing for one’s own clear, masculine, inner father.

The same is true with the longing for mother. Many people who were raised by a narcissistic mother suffer from a mother wound, which leads them to seek false mother figures or project their unworked feelings about this primal relationship onto their partner. When we break apart the longing and examine the wound at its core, we learn that there is grief contained inside it: the grief of not having had a mother that knew who to put your needs first. This needs attention. Then there is the invitation to create a sustaining, daily relationship with both the Great Mother through nature and active imagination and a relationship to one’s own inner mother: the place inside that tends to ourselves with compassion and gentleness. If we only follow the original longing we miss the deeper underpinnings that can guide us toward healing and growth.

We can deconstruct the list of longings at the beginning of this post in the same manner. And, of course, some of the longings – like the longing for a baby – contain both a root longing and a secondary longing. When a woman longs for a baby we must take it at face value, as for many women becoming a mother is one of the most primal needs she has. But when conception doesn’t occur quickly, she’s then asked to deconstruct this immense longing into its disparate elements. There she often finds a longing for her own wholeness, a need to connect to the fertility and the juiciness of being a fully creative woman that extends beyond conception.

Let’s take a look at another longing from the list: the very common longing for more desire that appears in many stable relationships. I often hear statements like, “I wish I wanted to be physically close to my partner like I was in the beginning or with my ex,” or “I long for more sexual desire for my partner.” Taken at face value, these statements easily activate the anxious mind, and it’s a not far leap to jump on the “I’m with the wrong partner” train of thought. The minute you jump on that train, you’re headed down the slippery slope that lands you in relationship anxiety torment. But if you can approach the longing with curiosity and discern between root and secondary longing, you’re on the road to building your own self-knowledge, which then culminates in more inner wisdom.

The root longing here is the longing for more closeness and desire in an intimate relationship. This is a healthy longing and one that, when followed and nurtured over time, will result in a deepening of intimacy. In other words, the longing for more desire is a healthy one. If you didn’t long for more closeness you wouldn’t be healthfully attached! So we see the longing as evidence of a healthy attachment style and then ask, “What’s interfering with our closeness?” We also keep in mind that when relationships are nurtured in healthy ways, the effortless flow of affection and sexuality arises naturally. And we must remember that this a dance that can take many, many years (decades, even) to find the steps that lead to more flow and desire.

Then we go deeper and ask, “Where do I feel desire in my life separate from my partner? How is my relationship to my own aliveness? Where do I feel turned-on and excited by my life? Am I having enough fun? Am I connecting enough to my own creative and spiritual wellsprings? Are these channels of passion open and vital, awake and pulsating with a desire to explore, create, and connect with my version of the divine? Am I connecting to a wild, abandoned, ecstatic part of me?” If we’re not passionate about our own lives we’re going to feel a certain stagnancy in our partnerships, as it’s not our partners job to ignite this passion. We must take full responsibility for our primal needs for ecstasy and wildness.

If the longing for desire is directly connected to sexuality, we ask, “How is my own sexual relationship with myself, separate from my partner? Do I feel awake and connected to my body? Do I feel my own arousal? What is my relationship like to touch?” If you know that you struggle in any of these areas, then the work is to turn inward and explore your own blocks that prevent you from being in fluid and active relationship with yourself and your partner.

So the longing for more desire contains both a longing for your own aliveness/wildness and a longing for closeness with your partner. What is does not contain is a push toward finding a different partner.

The trap – the achilles heel of the anxious mind – is to believe the thought that says, “I would have effortless desire with someone else.” Desire is tricky because it’s often intimately connected to longing, so if your ex was someone who wasn’t emotionally available and you were in the pursuer role of the pursuer-distancer dynamic, desire would have come more effortlessly. But I don’t consider this the true, healthy desire that arises when two people are in the same place at the same time, desire the originates from a full well of Self and overflows to meet the reliable presence of a loving partner. No, I consider it longing-induced desire, akin to what our culture calls “being in love.”

If we are to be love-warriors, we must find the courage to meet all of our emotions with tenderness and curiosity, understanding that they originate inside of us and, thus, can be resolved inside of us. The culturally-conditioned habit is to jump ship when longing arises and fall prey to the belief that the answers lie “out there”. The love-warrior stays the course and turns inward to discover the true source of longing.

There is wisdom in longing, a message from the underworld of psyche that longs to be known. If we take the longing at face value, we often find ourselves on a wild-goose chase punctuated by increasing anxiety that culminates in despair. But when we learn to read the impulses from psyche as messages from the underworld, and avail ourselves of the archetype of Persephone, the priestess who is a go-between the worlds of seen and unseen, we become the our own Wise Woman or Wise Man, our own oracle that can divine our paths without needing to seek answers from other so-called experts. For contained in the messengers of longing, anxiety, and intrusive thoughts are pearls of wisdom that, when deciphered, can lead us onto our own empowered path where we deeply know everything we need to know.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

The Saga Of My Rape Kit

Cambridge, England — My rape kit was created on the evening of Sunday, Jan. 12, 1992, at Magee-Womens Hospital in Pittsburgh. Tiny pieces of evidence were swabbed, plucked and combed from me: bits of me and, they hoped, bits of him, to be used in court one day to prove who had done this to me. Like many evidence kits collected at that time, it was not analyzed for DNA, and became part of what is called the backlog: untested rape kits across the country, which number at minimum in the tens of thousands.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

How to Apply a Mindset of Growth to Your Business

2016-05-17-1463505971-6815390-PeterDaisyme.pngBy Peter Daisyme

Stanford University psychologist and friend Carol Dweck pioneered the important idea of the mindsets that separate those who get by from those who succeed. Through extensive research, she developed the idea that there is a fixed mindset and a growth mindset. To Dweck, there’s power in the belief that you can improve beyond your existing skills, as she explains in this TED talk.

Over the past two years, I’ve learned how to apply these principles towards my own mindset. I’ve also instilled these ideas in my employees and gained a better understanding of how to truly empower a growth mindset. Here’s what I’ve learned from making this shift.

Fixed Versus Growth Mindsets

I try to focus on a growth mindset because it goes beyond fixed traits or talents. It seeks further development of one’s existing abilities through hard work and commitment.

The growth mindset can be applied to almost anything, from children in school to personal and career development. As an entrepreneur or business owner, you can apply the concept of a growth mindset to take your company to the next level by further developing your and your employees’ abilities.

In revisiting her research, Dweck further explained that a growth mindset goes beyond making extra effort. Getting praise is nice, but could actually inhibit you from further learning. While hard work is an important ingredient for this mindset, there are other necessary actions, including trying new strategies and considering input from others when there you encounter barriers.

Learning From Setbacks

Personally, I’ve learned to take risks outside of my comfort zone with my strategic marketing decisions. This has not always led to success but has taught me new ways to look at my target audience through the reactions I received from the new tactics. When I first tried using social media platforms to communicate with my audience, for example, I wasn’t sure it would work because I’d always relied on traditional marketing channels and felt they did what I needed. However, once social media started delivering new information about my prospects, my understanding grew and I was able to push the business further than if I’d stuck with my tried and true methods.

A core idea is to get over the fear of failure and learn from setbacks. You can’t blame your environment; instead, determine how a situation can be actively changed. A growth mindset focuses on this approach to short and long-term experiences as well as assesses what happened during each event to see if there was a lesson to be learned.

In her research, Dweck showed that all of us have elements of both mindsets. Therefore, knowing what’s needed for a growth mindset can help us acknowledge to what degree we need to change.

Applying a Growth Mindset to Your Business: Embrace Failure, Take Risks

With this idea as the foundation, the next step is to determine how to apply the growth mindset to your business. As an entrepreneur, you’re already putting in tremendous effort, but working around the clock is not be the only way to apply a growth mindset to your company. The next level is to embrace the failures you experience along the way and learn from situations where you fell short.

While some risks for growth’s sake have worked, I’ve still failed along the way — including business ideas that I spent time and money developing only to find out there wasn’t an interested audience. It was disappointing, but this failure taught me to do more research prior to spending so much time and money on a startup. It also helped me learn more about my audience and what they really wanted from a product or service.

As Dweck explains in this interview, a growth mindset also forces you to change your priorities because you start looking for specific experiences that push you to try something new. In some situations, I had to change the course of my business because what I learned showed that the company was not going to remain relevant or sustainable on its current trajectory. If I had stuck with the fixed mindset, that course correction may have never occurred.

When I entered the online marketing business many years ago, it was relatively unknown. Instead of approval, people seemed confused and didn’t think I was going anywhere. If I had focused on their doubt, I never would have taken the risk of starting a business that is now the norm. Similarly, how would any of the disruptive products and services that are now dominating the market have been developed had those business owners not deployed their own growth mindsets?

Peter Daisyme is a special adviser to Due, a payments invoicing company helping small business owners transact money online. He’s been a CPA for the past 18 years. He recently sold his previous company Hostt.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Silencing the Voices of Others

Excerpted from the chapter “Silencing the Voices of Others — with Jason Stanley,” in I’m Right and You’re an Idiot: The Toxic State of Public Discourse and How to Clean It Up.

When I began thinking about pollution in the public square, the attack rhetoric and toxic public discourse that we hear coming from all sides, I wanted to know more about what was causing it and how to dial it down. Why? Because this kind of damaging debate leads to inaction and gridlock. If we could clean up the public square and make space for real conversations, maybe we could begin dealing with today’s serious issues such as climate change.

Having been in PR for 30 years, I know that lasting solutions to a communications challenge are found when we first examine the background causes of a problem and the obstacles to change. Jason Stanley is an expert in this area. A professor of philosophy and epistemology at Yale, he teaches courses on democracy and propaganda; but he also explores new ideas and techniques about mass deception that are directly related to pollution in the public square. One of these is something he calls “silencing.”

There are a number of rhetorical and linguistic tactics being used to silence people today, and he said one of the most blatant is the misappropriation of words such as “ethical” or “clean” in relation to oil and coal. In an article for the New York Times’ Stone series, Stanley said that using what he called code words to win support has always been part of the arsenal of politics, but it is now widely used in the popular media.

When we talked, Stanley explained that making outlandish allegations, twisting meanings and making improbable statements have the same effect. This is not really about making substantive claims; these tactics are what he calls linguistic strategies for stealing the voices of others, silencing people. Making bizarre claims that President Obama is a secret Islamist agent, or was born in Kenya, painted the US President as grossly insincere. His voice was stolen, not by a legitimate objection to his platform or a logical argument, but by undermining the public’s trust in him so that nothing he said could be taken at face value. Simply put, when Fox News carried a story charging Obama with being a secret Muslim it damaged everyone’s sincerity, and any opportunity for reasoned debate evaporated.

It’s a simple tactic: When the public doesn’t trust you and you can’t rely on your own credibility to argue your viewpoint, when the public doesn’t share your values or interests, when facts aren’t on your side, why not attack and undermine your opponents’ integrity while making them appear to have a vested interest?

When no audience or viewer expects truth in the media, only bias, political candidates cannot be held responsible for lying. Stanley made the case that it becomes possible for everyone to lie with impunity; there is no downside to deceit. Every person has an “everyone’s doing it” defense. People start to believe that no one is speaking authentically, that even scientists are massaging data to suit their ideological agendas.

Jason Stanley says this is an attack on objective speech. When scientists’ facts aren’t clear, when everyone is trying to either complicate issues unnecessarily or promote a political agenda, public dialogue becomes confused. People start to believe that “Climate scientists are just trying to get us to wear healthy clothing, or eat vegetarian food … They are just trying to sway you, not inform you about what is going on.”

Stanley believes right wing media, such as Fox News, is not trying to communicate accurate, well-researched stories, but is intentionally scrambling information, broadcasting noise so that it becomes difficult to hear the truth. This insight came to him a few years ago, when he was watching Fox News and began thinking about its claim of being “fair and balanced,” something he and his friends thought nobody believed, including Fox News. He decided that the right wing news media is not trying to deliver fair and balanced coverage of events or reportage of issues. Instead, the message of Rupert Murdoch’s media corporations goes something like this: In a world where everyone is trying to manipulate everyone else for their own interests and where no one can believe anything they hear, there is no point in being fair, no possibility of balance. This results in a silencing of all news sources by suggesting everyone is grossly insincere.

Stanley warned that democracy is in danger when we no longer expect truth or demand accountability from public figures, when there is no longer even a pretense of integrity. One early warning sign of this is when an institution is “having a problem” with facts, when the facts don’t align with its interests and rivals may have more credibility. The climate change debate is rife with examples of this, Stanley told me.

Public discourse has deteriorated to such an extent that the traditional debating model — based on accuracy, evidence and proof — isn’t happening, so the typical fallback position is to tarnish another person’s reputation. When it comes to climate change, for instance, the new technique is to first criticize the research and scholarship, then undermine and discredit scientists. How is this done? Rather than challenging facts, Stanley believes the general strategy is to co-opt vocabulary.

“It is difficult to have a reasoned debate about the costs and benefits of a policy when one side has seized control of the linguistic means to express all positive claims.” This kind of dexterous management of language was brilliantly highlighted in the writings of George Orwell, whose Newspeak was designed by a one-party state to prevent freethinking. Stanley said the diaries of Polish-born journalist and comparative literature professor Victor Klemperer are another rich resource when detailing this kind of propaganda.

Drawing on his experience in Germany from 1933 to 1945, the linguist recorded how propaganda changed the value of words. For instance “special treatment” became a euphemism for murder; “intensified interrogation” another name for torture and words such as “fanatical” were elevated to the rank of high praise. It is difficult to have a sensible debate about a policy’s benefits versus costs when the policy is labeled “Operation Iraqi Freedom” or “tax relief.”

Co-opted language takes many forms, including oxymorons such as “clean coal” or “ethical oil.” Stanley explained that seizing control of positive vocabulary makes naysayers appear to oppose something that is clearly beneficial. “It’s possible to silence people by denying them access to the vocabulary to express their claims.”

Democracy only works if reasoned debate in the public square is possible. If everything is mislabeled, then conditions for deliberative democracy do not exist. If people are deluded into thinking there is such a thing as clean coal, or ethical oil, if their ability to apply correct facts is circumvented, and the credibility of experts is undercut, where is the basis for reasoned debate? It’s like trying to design a building without a level.

Stanley became concerned about the role of silencing in the public sphere through analyzing right wing media and its reliance on truthiness — a word coined by satirist Stephen Colbert to describe the “feeling” of truth based on a gut reaction, rather than evidence or logic. Stanley explained when citizens have no access to reliable news they become suspicious and untrusting: “The effects of a belief in general gross insincerity are apparent in societies in which the state media delivers only propaganda. Citizens who grow up in a state where authorities deliver propaganda have no experience with trust.” In such an authoritarian society, “The public’s trust in public speech, whether by politicians or in the media, disintegrates to such a degree that it undermines the possibility of straightforward communication in the public sphere.”

Stanley used the example of North Korea: “Clearly something is really wrong with discussion in the public sphere in North Korea.” Democracy only worksif you have normal, reasoned debate…so you need to set the conditions where that’s possible. We would hope that free speech guarantees the conditions for deliberative democracy, but if that is true: “How did we end up with public spaces in North America where nobody trusts what anyone says, and that look in certain aspects like North Korea — even though we’ve got free speech? That’s a real mystery.”

The answer is, when everyone has the right to make up his or her own facts it weakens everyone’s ability to speak with integrity. He concluded: Free speech alone is not sufficient for delivering the conditions for reasoned debate. It is impossible without trust and sincerity, and Stanley suggests this is the first critical piece in the puzzle he calls The Ways of Silencing.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Stop Telling Women They’re Doing Feminism Wrong

Right now, someone somewhere — probably a woman — is doing feminism wrong. This is the overwhelming message that is being beamed everywhere. Robin Wright may be making public her demand for equal pay for her role in House of Cards, but that is all right for her; she is a white, privileged film star. “Has celebrity feminism failed?” asked Andi Zeisler this week, in her new book We Were Feminists Once, because God knows it’s a worry…

The assumption that any celebrity who says something vaguely feminist is somehow a hypocrite is ludicrous.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Magical Photo Series Brings Kids' Imaginary Friends To Life

An adorable photo series is bringing kids’ imaginary friends to life.

Inspired by her 3-year-old daughter Mia, photographer Anna Angenend teamed up with illustrator and fellow mom Amy Snyder (aka Amy Gets Artsy) to create a series called “My Monster & Me.” The photos show kids along with the magical friends (or in some cases “monsters”) from their imaginations.

“One morning several months ago, Mia said to me, ‘My yellow monster is kind of scary,'” Angenend told The Huffington Post. “Later in the day she told me, ‘He’s not so scary, he just needs a friend!'” That evening when she was getting ready for bed, she exclaimed, ‘My yellow monster doesn’t want to brush his teeth, he loves his cavities!'”

“This was the first time she had talked about an imaginary friend, or in her case, a monster,” Angenend added. “She hasn’t talked about the yellow monster much since that day, but it was so cute it gave me the idea of creating an image and adding her monster to it. At three years old, her imagination and creative play has really soared, and I wanted a new photo series to capture this part of her childhood.”

The mom attempted to doodle her daughter’s yellow monster friend, but, dissatisfied with the result, she asked Snyder to help with the project. By observing their kids’ playtime together, the two moms brainstormed ideas for the series.

Angenend photographed Mia, two of Snyder’s children and one of the kids’ playdate friends, Marie Elise. Then, Snyder illustrated the monsters and emailed the scanned drawings to the photographer, who used “Photoshop fairy dust” to create the final images. 

“We hope that people will fall in love with the characters as much as the images, and reach out to us to capture their own children and their imaginary friends, or whimsical worlds,” Angenend told HuffPost, adding, “We would love for the series to be a reminder of the magical world our kids are living in, and that their everyday activities may be so much more to them then what we see.”

Keep scrolling and visit Angenend’s Facebook page to see the whimsical photo series, along with the artist’s captions and quotes from the kids depicted.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.