Hasta La Gadget!

So, that happened. As you may have heard, for the first time in the storied history of Las Vegas, plans went awry. Last weekend, the Nevada Democratic convention turned into a raucous fracas as Democrats met to finalize the process of selecting delegates. During the proceedings, supporters of Bernie Sanders formed the opinion that those in charge were manipulating the rules in a way that benefited Hillary Clinton. There was an eruption of displeasure, the exact details of which have been litigated several times over, with several more litigations no doubt to come.

Now, in the aftermath, a two-pronged media narrative has crystallized. Has the Democratic Party’s primary become historically acrimonious? Can Sanders prevent the party from fracturing fatally? On this week’s podcast, we discuss how this narrative is not only overhyped, but gets the issue of who is responsible for future reconciliations backward. 

If you view this Democratic primary from a certain perspective, it’s easy to come away with the impression that it has been one of unprecedented nastiness. On Twitter — a social media platform designed to provide users with up-to-the-minute information about how they are the worst persons ever and why their deeply held beliefs belong in the garbage — the fan bases of Clinton and Sanders routinely piddle into the streams, performing daily acts of spirited debasement. If your only entry into this world is through the lens of those who either have, or imagine themselves to have, a life-or-death stake in the contest, you might miss the fact that most Democrats are happy to support either candidate in the general election. 

And if you’ve gotten so drunk on this primary’s rancor that you believe something unprecedented is unfurling, Vox’s Matt Yglesias will sober you up very quickly. As he points out at length, this Democratic primary has been tame, when compared with others — and really, the 2008 primary between Clinton and Barack Obama really was a full-on pit of snakes with flamethrower-hot WTFery coming from all directions when held up against the current one.

But the secondary issue is this: Ever since the fooferaw in Nevada, the media’s focus seems to have fixated on whether Sanders will do enough to heal whatever rifts have been opened, whether he’ll summon up the grace to join Clinton in unity at the party convention, and the extent to which he’ll have to endeavor to talk his supporters down from the tree. The assumption that underlies all of this chatter is that Sanders is going to lose the primary. That’s a well-founded assumption: He is going to lose the primary.

But this overlooks the fact that the responsibility of unifying the party falls to the winner of the primary, not the loser. To anyone who thinks otherwise: Come on, now. This is literally the job of the person who becomes the presidential candidate, not the person who is going to be pursuing politics in some other office. An election is not a contest between warring factions, where the winner gets to spend the next four years stunting on the losers. The electoral process will decide which candidate will serve all Americans. And all Americans are owed something, no matter how the votes were cast.

This is how magnanimity works. I literally had to go to Australia to find someone who has gotten this right. Congratulations to Nicole Hemmer, columnist with The Age, for writing it this way: 

But Sanders’ success points to a significant insurgency among Democrats: Clinton faces a far more daunting task than simply nabbing the nomination or winning the election — she must secure the future of the Democratic Party.

Over the next six months, the choices Clinton makes will help determine whether the Democrats will be the new majority party or be consigned to the wilderness for a generation. Can she bring Sanders supporters into an enduring majority, or will she alienate them and leave a fractious, fractured party in her wake?

The challenge — and opportunity — for Clinton comes from the unusual political conditions in the U.S. The two major parties are shuddering through a period of realignment. As the coalitions built in the 1980s and `90s break apart, a throng of interest groups are scrambling to shape new partnerships that will take their place.

This is correct. Sanders’ campaign has successfully revealed what had been some previously muted truths about the way many Americans live, and the way they perceive how successful or inept the institutions that are supposed to serve their interests are doing their jobs. Those people are owed something and everybody knows it. Since Clinton is the likely nominee, this is her responsibility. It’s not Sanders’ job to deliver up his followers, as if they were a vanquished army — it’s Clinton’s job to induce their continued participation. And she won’t succeed if she treats their concerns as a dead letter simply because she won more delegates.

Similarly, this act should not be seen as Clinton caving to demands. This should be seen as a vital part of her political education. She should be eager to step up, find a way to reckon with the concerns of Sanders’ supporters, and offer them a view of a future in which they can participate. This isn’t done out of niceness. This is the secondary purpose of a primary election — exposing truths that would go missed if the candidates were simply left to view America through their own blinkered perspective.

There’s plenty worth litigating about Sanders, his campaign, and some of the more infamous grotesqueries for which he and his supporters are responsible. For instance, in a perfect world, there should be consequences for the wretched nimrods who threatened Nevada Democratic Chairwoman Roberta Lange with bodily harm. These people need some time away from politics, to become as fair-minded as the “system” they’d like to see govern our lives.

More broadly, the Sanders family view of the primary process as something that was uniquely rigged against it in particular deserves some re-examination. Yes, the process is byzantine and nonsensical. It has been that way for decades. Yes, the process tends to favor the candidates preferred by party elites. That should have been planned for in advance. I’d argue that 2012’s Ron Paul supporters — who, compared with Team Sanders, learned more about their primary process, and more skillfully manipulated it in their favor — got screwed over much worse. And brazenly so, right on the stage of the Republican convention.

But none of these matters should be litigated by Clinton. That’s not her job. Her job is to view this primary as an opportunity to see where some of the real fault lines in America are running right now. Sanders and his supporters have played a vital role in this, and when she secures this nomination, it will be her job to repay their generosity.

And it’s going to be good practice for her, because her next step will be attempting to contend with the real concerns of Donald Trump’s supporters as well, because ultimately, they — like everyone else served by the person we like to call “the leader of the free world” — are owed some consideration as well. And if there truly is something dark in our country that’s animating them — as many believe — that’s something no president can avoid addressing. 

Elsewhere on this week’s podcast: The 2008 financial collapse spurred a terrifying foreclosure crisis across America, forcing countless people from their homes. But what many homeowners discovered when they tried to save their homes is that the entire foreclosure industry was underpinned by rampant fraud and forged documents. Author David Dayen met many of the people who fought on the front lines of this battle, and wrote a book about it called, “Chain Of Title.” He’s here to talk about what many people missed about this aspect of the financial crisis.

In addition, Congress is taking its best shot at dealing with multiple crises at the moment. In Washington, legislators are proceeding in relatively swift and bipartisan fashion to address America’s opiate addiction crisis, optimistic that they’ll have a law signed soon. Joining us to talk about these goings-on is Wisconsin GOP Rep. Reid Ribble.

Shaping up more slowly is Congress’ response to the Puerto Rico debt crisis. The island territory could miss a $2 billion payment in July, creating the dire need for a loan restructuring plan before the problem deepens. Our own Laura Barron-Lopez has been covering this story from San Juan to Capitol Hill. She’ll join us to talk about whether Congress will miss its shot.

“So, That Happened” is hosted by Jason Linkins, Zach Carter and Arthur Delaney. Joining them this week: author David Dayen, Wisconsin Representative Reid Ribble, and Huffington Post reporter Laura Barron-Lopez.

This podcast was produced, edited and engineered by Christine Conetta.

To listen to this podcast later, download our show on iTunes. While you’re there, please subscribe to, rate and review our show. You can check out other HuffPost podcasts here.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

You treat your best friends with love, respect and kindness — but do you extend the same courtesy to yourself?

We’re often our own worst critics — and that can take a serious toll on our everyday lives. Self-compassion, or the art of expressing warmth and understanding toward yourself at all times, is an important element to wellbeing. Not only does it benefit your mental health, but research shows it can even improve aspects of your physical health.

The best part? It’s fairly simple to do. Practicing self-compassion is just “talking to yourself with an encouraging inner dialogue,” self-compassion researcher Kristin Neff, an associate professor of educational psychology at the University of Texas, Austin, told The Huffington Post. This includes acknowledging a difficulty or a challenge and telling yourself it’s okay that it’s occurring.

Life is better when you treat yourself with kindness. We chatted with a few self-compassion researchers on the overwhelming benefits of the practice. Check them out below and transform your mental attitude ASAP.

1. Self-compassion makes you more resilient.

Think of a time when you may not have received a promotion or a job you really wanted. Did you beat yourself up about it or ruminate over your mistakes? Chances are that’s not going to help you in the next similar situation. It’s easier to bounce back from failure when you’re kind to yourself, says self-compassion researcher and Harvard Medical School clinical psychology instructor Christopher Germer.  

“Self-compassion is an important factor in emotional resilience,” Germer told The Huffington Post. “There’s just a wide range of elements it enhances when it comes to emotional wellbeing.”

2. It betters your relationships.

Not only will your relationship with yourself improve, it’ll strengthen your other relationships as well, Germer says. 

“Studies suggest that self-compassion can lead to an increase in social connectedness,” he explained. And it makes sense: by expressing compassion inward, you’re setting yourself up to be a more understanding person overall — and that can help you relate and bond with others.

3. It’ll help you be less of a perfectionist.

If you’re harshly self-critical, you may want to make room for the practice to release yourself from the chains of perfectionism, Germer says. Research suggests that those who reported low self-compassion also reported more perfectionistic self-presentation. And that aim for perfection can take a toll on your wellbeing.

“People tend to be much crueler to themselves than anyone else,” Neff said. “When you practice self-compassion, you essentially have a friend in your head.”

4. Self-compassion helps with body positivity.

Preliminary research is also suggesting that self-compassion can serve as an intervention for those who may be at risk for body-based mental health issues, Germer explained. That’s a huge step for body positivity.

“Women with disturbed body image who listened to [self-compassion] tapes for a few weeks may find that although the may not have lost weight during that time, they had a less harsh and critical relationship with their bodies,” he said. 

5. It’s a nonjudgmental way of talking to yourself.

Self-compassion is not a measure of your confidence or how you feel about yourself at a given moment, Neff says. 

“Self-compassion is not self-esteem because it’s not a judgment of your worth,” she explained. “It’s a more stable way of relating to yourself and it doesn’t go up or down. It’s not based on judging good or bad. It’s there during success and times of failure.”

6. It allows you to engage in healthy activities.

Practicing self-compassion is more than just giving yourself platitudes — it also means participating in fulfilling, calming activities. Self-compassionate people journal, read books, spend time with loved ones, take bubble baths or do anything that promotes self care, Germer says.

7. It helps you become your own biggest ally.

Self-compassion puts the best person in your corner: you. The habit turns you from your biggest enemy to your strongest cheerleader, Neff says.

“If is a friend is upset, you’re encouraging and understanding,” she explained. “A self-compassionate person treats themselves with that same attitude.”

8. Self-compassion makes you happier.

When it comes down to it, Neff says the practice can transform your overall outlook. Research shows that self-compassion can make you more joyful — and who wouldn’t want to live life with a happier frame of mind?

So go on, be kind to yourself. You deserve it.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

One of the coolest features that the iPhone and other smartphones have gained in recent years is the ability to unlock the devices with a fingerprint rather than a passcode. A report claims that Apple is looking to make it easier to unlock your Mac computer by being able to swipe a finger on your iPhone to unlock the computer … Continue reading

Cinemax’s upcoming show Outcast will debut on Facebook Live in Europe and Africa tonight. Outcast is an adaptation of The Walking Dead creator Robert Kirkman’s comic book series of the same name. Dealing with the supernatural and demonic possession,…

Every year, we eat up all the red carpet photos from the Cannes Film Festival. Just about every A-lister is in attendance, and they always pull out all the stops. 

And this year, the red carpet was filled of tons of candid and sweet moments. Like when Naomi Watts and Susan Sarandon hugged hello. Or when Julia Roberts and George Clooney couldn’t stop joking around. And how about all the bird’s-eye view shots of the stunning gowns? 

Check out a few of our favorite unexpected red carpet moments below:

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.