The Empathy Revolution Begins at Home

2016-06-15-1466027582-8181521-Empathy001.jpg

There is a common thread that seems to lead us into the depths of cruelty and violence we as a nation and planet are experiencing. It is a lack of empathy.

Empathy is defined as the ability to understand and share the feelings of another.

As parents we can teach our children what we know based on what we have learned or experienced. But teaching our children how to feel empathy towards other human beings is quite another matter.

It is vital that we, as parents, attempt to educate and model to our children how to relate to, respect, and empathize with the other human beings on this earth who are going to be walking alongside them in varying degrees of relationships throughout their lives.

Our children are growing up in an amazing world filled with love, opportunity, and diversity. Unfortunately, they are also growing up in a world filled with violence, hate, and destruction. This is not a new theme. This cycle has been on repeat for quite some time and wherever our children go, whether it’s to school, the mall, a movie theater, a dance club, or even their own home – the cycle of violence is likely to find them.

Our children will be affected in some way — directly or indirectly — by abuse, violence, and death at the hands of those who appear to be unable to love themselves or anyone else around them. This is why we parents need to start the effort of re-evaluating the in which way we think, speak, and act around our children.

A revolution of empathy needs to begin in our individual homes. The expression of compassion, acceptance, and the capability to show empathy needs to become the foundation for raising children surrounded by intolerance.

Home environments where a child can feel secure in expressing their curiosity about different races, religions, or lifestyles has to be created and secured. It’s a process which can have everlasting, positive effects on the generations to come.

A child should be able to have their questions about different cultures and lifestyles answered in a manner that does not include disgust, rejection, or tones of absolute judgement. This is where it all begins. In the home. The seeds of empathy for other human beings are planted in the living rooms, bedrooms, and kitchens across this nation and world.

It’s not enough that we say, “Be kind to everyone and don’t bully.” We as parents need to show our children what it means to accept others. We also need to teach children how to appropriately digest and productively disagree with those we have issues with, instead of rushing to insult or even physically harm them.

It begins when you comment on current events on the nightly news in front of your children. It begins when a relative or family friend has a different opinion at a party or family function. Our children are watching how we respond to things that are awkward or foreign to us. There is a distinct difference between “speaking your mind” and being unnecessarily disrespectful to other people.

There is absolutely nothing Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton, or even Bernie Sanders can do that will encourage our children to become empathetic, thinking, active citizens. That job starts with us.

Any parent who thinks that gun violence, homophobia, or racism won’t affect them should think again. It affects our neighbors, our friends, our children’s friends, families of people we know, and so on.

Unfortunately we often don’t care about specific issues until they impact us personally or affect someone we know. Many times, those who thought they felt a certain way will change their perspective once violence kills a person they love, or harms an innocent child.

When a parent has the ability to put themselves into the shoes of another and tries to understand how they live and feel, this gift of empathy is more likely to be passed on to their children and the generations that follow.

Intolerance, violence, and malicious intent are often cultivated in the most innocent of citizens in this world by their parents. It is a learned behavior. Children mimic their parents.

Of course, we cannot hold parents accountable for everything their children say and do – but there’s no getting out of the fact that parents are a powerful influence on the children they raise.

There will always be exceptions where some people are born with brains that aren’t wired for compassion or empathy, but we must accept there are things we simply cannot control and focus on the things we can be pro-active about.

Our children — whom many of us claim are our most valuable asset for the future of this world — are waiting for us to teach them with open ears and a potentially unlimited vision for us as a human race.

This is on our watch.

More from Michelle in Parenting – To the Dads Who are Supermen – I see You

More in Politics – Why Donald Trump’s Hate Campaign Could be Exactly What America Needs

Originally a Vancouver Island native, Michelle now resides in California where she is an ex-corporate slave, writer, artist, mother, stepmother, & wife.

Join Michelle as she explores & stumbles through society, parenting, step-parenting, health, beauty, relationships & much more.

Catch more at The Pondering Nook and The Pondering Nook’s Facebook page.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Why I'm Over Getting Girls To Code

Last week I had the pleasure of attending the United State of Women Summit in Washington DC. The summit was hosted by the White House and featured the most unbelievable lineup of speakers (Warren Buffett, Oprah, POTUS, Connie Britton, Michelle Obama, Amy Poehler, Shonda Rhimes, Billie Jean King…and the list goes on and on), plus 5,000 women from all over the country convening in one place to talk about our collective favorite topic: women!!!!

Who doesn’t love women?

As you might imagine in a conference all about women and the future of the United States, tech was a BIG topic. In fact they devoted a whole panel to it, titled “Cracking the Code: Access to STEM for all Women and Girls.”

But you know what was missing? An actual discussion of…getting WOMEN into coding! All of the presenters who ran programs whose target audience was girls.

Have you noticed this?

I am sick of hearing about girls coding !!

Ok, now I obviously don’t really mean that.

:: Hyperbole! Everyone, step down! ::

The work that organizations like Code.org and Girls Who Code and Google’s Made with Code and Hopscotch and Black Girls Code are doing to encourage girls to code is nothing short of amazing.

But what I don’t like is that so many high profile conversations about getting women into tech end up actually being discussions of how to get more girls interested in coding and seem to forget women entirely.

In these discussions it’s inevitably brought up that most girls lose interest in the STEM fields around age 13, so we must get to them before 13!!

But I’d like to propose an alternative solution.

It involves metaphorical trampolines. Bear with me…

What if we recognize that a certain percentage of girls may not get exposed to technology before 13, or may lose interest, or may, for any number of reasons, not identify technology as something they are interested in until quite a bit later.

Meaning, yep, we’ve got a leaky pipeline. And it’s leaking girls all over the place.

But instead of focusing our efforts exclusively on keeping girls in the pipeline until they become women, what if we offer women some trampolines to that they can use to bounce back into tech jobs later in life?

What do you think??

Here’s the thing: focusing so exclusively on girls promotes the single most insidious idea that’s keeping women AND girls from flocking to the tech world: that if you don’t learn to code early in life, it’s too late.

Not only is that patently false-allow me to give you myself, nearly all of the Skillcrush team, most people I’ve ever worked with in tech, thousands of Skillcrush alumni, as well as all the graduates of tech bootcamps everywhere as evidence that this is not true-it’s an idea that’s fundamentally out of sync with how the job market currently works.

By now, we’ve all read the statistic that today’s workers change jobs on average every 3 years. And there’s no way we can all go back to college every time we make a jump. Career-long learning, as well as picking up new skills later in life, is simply a requirement of the modern economy.

Constant skill building is the name of this train people! Get on board!

Which is all to say, I want to celebrate WOMEN of all ages learning to code. In fact, I want to celebrate them all day long, every day.

On my Skillcrush trampoline!

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Cavaliers Fan Appears To Eat Horse Poop At Victory Parade

It seems at least one fan wore a shit-eating grin for real after the Cavaliers won the NBA championship.

As pointed out by Cleveland.com, this guy picks up what appears to be horse poop during Wednesday’s victory parade in Cleveland and plops it into his mouth. He then tosses a clump into the air and catches it in his mouth as if it were a gum drop. Observers are both repelled and entertained, just as we are frankly.

While we can’t confirm the provenance of said manure, some Twitter users who said they were there insisted it was real poop from a real horse’s ass.

Warning: This video is disgusting (duh):

The late drag queen Divine earned notoriety for reportedly eating dog feces for real in the 1972 John Waters film “Pink Flamingos.”

Who knows what fame and fortune or total embarrassment await this fellow.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Guns And The (Re)Public's Health

Gun ownership may be a constitutional right, but gun safety is a public health issue. Thus, in considering the extraordinary sit-in by members of Congress in the United States House of Representatives, it is imperative that we not lose sight of the health impact of this action and its consequences.

By now, anyone willing honestly to consider the issue of gun safety understands that thoughtful restrictions on access to firearms can protect the safety and health of individual Americans. But one perspective that may be overlooked is how the present confrontation is negatively affecting the health of our American republic. No citizen can take comfort in the fact that elected officials felt compelled to engage in civil disobedience to draw attention to modest, but popular, legislative proposals for reducing the access to firearms. Regardless of one’s party affiliation or ideological commitment to the Second Amendment, such proposals deserved debate and a vote by the people’s elected lawmakers. Our republic is weakened when the House Speaker can thwart the democratic process so as to protect his partisan allies from risking the displeasure of the powerful gun lobby.

The nation’s health is further jeopardized when fealty to gun rights trump other protections, including freedom of speech. Some state legislators have gone so far as to bar physicians from discussing child safety protections with gun-owning parents. Moreover, by liberalizing concealed carrying restrictions, lawmakers have expanded the spaces where Americans may fear for their safety or risk to their lives, including places of worship and college campuses. A debate over gun safety would enable supporters of restrictions to highlight research showing that access restrictions reduce gun deaths; it would also reveal that opponents can provide no credible evidence that the public is safer or that our democracy is healthier by doing nothing to reduce gun violence.

From a national health perspective, the initial response of House Republicans to the sit-in was jaw dropping. To preempt consideration of gun safety, Republicans voted to weaken legal protections of the fiscal health of middle-income investors as well as the integrity of our nation’s banking system. To disrupt their protesting colleagues, Republicans convened to override a Department of Labor regulation requiring professional financial advisors to prioritize their clients’ best interests when making investment recommendations for their client’s retirement funds. That we require a government mandate to ensure retirees are not cheated of their savings needed to meet health needs and to live with dignity in their final years is, by itself, stunning. The juxtaposition of the two issues reveals an obeisance to corporate and moneyed interests that is most troubling. It is consistent with efforts to relax drug safety regulation to ensure the financial health of pharmaceutical companies.

When middle of the night momentary “sessions” failed to end the sit-in, the Republicans declared the House in recess without first voting on funding needed to respond to the Zika virus threat. A public health crisis deserves action from responsible lawmakers who will not use human suffering to achieve extraneous political objectives. Rather than reserving debate over contested hot button issues for the appropriate public forums, Republicans are holding hostage the imperative of an disease response to the achievement of their ideological agenda. Ironically, these irresponsible lawmakers criticized the Democrats for violating House rules and dismissed the sit-in as a publicity stunt.

By abruptly adjourning the House for a prolonged July 4 vacation, the Republicans signaled there would be no debate or vote on gun safety and hence, no purpose in Democrats continuing their sit-in. Lawmakers are now free to bask in the spotlight of prominence in their local Independence Day parades as well as to take restful vacations before gearing up for their reelection campaigns. But for those of us who are not obsessed with restriction-free gun ownership, male, wealthy, powerful, and certain that opposing opinions are wrong, America’s birthday reminds us to worry anew about health of our republic.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

How We Can Change Our Minds — Literally — To Make Kinder, More Accepting Societies

2016-06-24-1466779233-2687292-PhotoofhandsunitedbyrvimagesviaiStockphoto.jpg

The horrendous tragedy in Orlando has prompted fierce debates about how to prevent such attacks – should there be more restrictions on gun ownership? Different military and diplomatic policies combatting terrorism?

Many of these debates break out along partisan lines with seemingly little room for compromise and action. But there is something we can do – each of us, whether parents or policy-makers, Republicans or Democrats.

As someone who has studied the science of emotion my entire adult life,
I took heart when my longtime friend the Dalai Lama issued a plea for the universal education of compassion, kindness, respect and responsibility in response to the onslaught of tragedy we face. While these principles are common to many faiths, this education is also based upon scientific findings. He calls this “secular ethics” and has drawn from my research and that of other scientists and scholars to provide the evidence that a kinder world is not only possible, but part of our biological makeup.

Evidence suggests that these positive qualities can be nurtured. Recent findings from our laboratory indicate that even preschool children can be taught to be more kind and accepting of others – to the benefit of themselves and their peers.

We know from modern neuroscience that the brain circuits that underlie all emotions – both positive and negative – can be changed. Many times this change occurs unwittingly, and we’re subject to forces around us willy-nilly.

But with a little training, we can harness the intrinsic plasticity of the brain networks that drive our emotions and behavior to intentionally strengthen positive qualities of mind like kindness, compassion, empathy and forgiveness.

The same neural circuits and connections that become disrupted leading to mental health problems and acts of violence are also the source from which they can be solved. Neuroplasticity allows the brain to be distorted by harsh and adverse environments – but also provides the basis to cultivate skills that promote well-being.

A growing amount of scientific evidence supports this.

For instance, we saw firsthand the potential of teaching young school children skills for their psychological well-being when we conducted the first randomized controlled study on a mindfulness-based “Kindness Curriculum” in preschoolers. The teachings focused on children’s self-regulation skills, including emotional control and the capacity to pay attention, as well as their ability to express kindness to their classmates and strangers.

We found that 5-year-olds who participated not only made better grades, they were also more likely to share and empathize with classmates who they previously expressed dislike toward.

When we shared similar practices in 5th-grade classrooms, students and administrators reported fewer conflicts at recess as well as children approaching each other more often to comfort one other and talk through their feelings.

One of the lessons we share with 5th graders underscores why our understanding of human emotion is vital to creating a better world – and this is a result of not only individual responsibility, but also communal responsibility.

We teach a practice called “The Compassion Circle,” where we first ask students a general question – Have you ever had a pet? What’s your favorite color? – and then have them sit in the circle with others who answered the question the same way. The idea is to see what happens when these students find common ground with one another and how that expands compassion for classmates they might have considered to be “outside” of their circle prior to the exercise.

When we asked one classroom the question Have you ever felt bullied or left out? nearly all students entered the circle. One student said it was one of the most powerful experiences she’s had at school. She had no idea she wasn’t alone in her feelings of isolation.

We need to expand our circle of common humanity, especially amid tragedy, with small acts of kindness and awareness every day.

This notion became especially clear when I experienced the joy of meeting my newborn grandson for the first time last week. And I imagined what the world might look like when he’s old enough to explore it on his own.

What kind of circle will he belong to? What world will I choose for him?

My aspiration for him and all of our children is that as adults, we will choose to stop waiting and start acting in ways large and small, at home, at school and in community, to promote a personal mental hygiene of well-being that embodies compassion toward others as a core value. It is only through training the mind that enduring changes in our collective behavior can be accomplished.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Women Innovating Africa: Meet Faith Chege

2016-06-09-1465502257-5324445-faithChege.jpg

One of the best parts, for me, of being involved with the YALI program is that I get to stay connected with the young African entrepreneurs I teach. I have to admit, that many of the women in my class impress the hell out of me with their creativity, collaboration and intent to make positive change in the world. With that in mind, I’d like to introduce you to a few of them over the next several months.

Second in this series is Faith Chege from Kenya. I met Faith when she spoke to my Design Driven Entrepreneurship classes in Nairobi this winter. She was Mandela Fellow in 2014 and I was truly inspired by her energy and drive and her stories of using human centered design. She’s also currently representing Kenya in this year’s Global Entrepreneurship Summit in Silicon Valley.

What do you do now?
I’m currently the Chief Financial Officer of Barefoot Power, a renewable energy multinational, where I oversee financial operations in the African region. I am also the founder of Dalah Ventures, a pre-investment support company, building an ecosystem of bankable projects in Africa.

How would you describe your current business?
Barefoot Power offers renewable energy solutions through manufacturing and distribution of home solar products. We have pivoted a lot over the last years based on feedback from our customers and market data. This has equipped us to design products that address our customers growing energy needs in the most effective way.

For a long time, we were leaders in the solar lanterns market where we focused on eradicating the kerosene lamp. However, we realised that our customer’s energy needs were growing and it was our responsibility to get them up the energy ladder. Therefore, in recent years, we have become followers in the solar lanterns market and leaders in the home solar systems market. Our products range from mobile phone chargers, radios, 22″ TVs, fans, fridges, laptop chargers, security lights, farm kits and LED tube lights, elevating livelihoods through clean energy.

With competitors like Elon Musk creating batteries that power gigafactories and electric vehicles, ignoring innovation is not an option. Leapfrogging fossil fuels to clean energy is an exciting opportunity in Africa, one that we intend to make a reality. In addition, initiatives such as COP21- Africa Renewable Energy Initiative that aims to add an additional 300 GW of renewable energy capacity to the African energy sector by 2030 make the future much brighter.

What is the main benefit for the customer with your work?
Our customer lives in the rural areas and has no access to power from the grid. As a result, he/she uses kerosene for lighting and lacks power to charge mobile phones, radios, TVs, fridges and other electronic appliances. Our solar products are therefore a solution to this gap by providing clean lighting as well as solar powered electronic appliances.

Describe how you use or have used design thinking or human centred design in your work.
As a solar energy provider for the bottom of the pyramid (BOP), our largest barrier is end user financing as most of our customers in rural Africa live on less that a $1 a day.

That said, we discovered after carefully studying our customer, that financing becomes a barrier mainly when your value proposition is weak. The BOP have working financing mechanisms to finance purchases of water tanks, mobile phones, cattle and other products they feel add value to their livelihoods.

During our sales sessions, we presented to the customers the 1st product, a 1 lamp solar lantern that replaces the tin lamp. They were not excited, if anything they bargained to have it for $3 instead of $10 claiming they could not afford anything pricier.

Then we presented to the same group of customers the 2nd product, a 2 lamped solar system that can charge up to 6 mobile phones. Their concern was how many phones it could charge before draining the battery, not how much it cost. They still bargained for a cheaper price.

Then we presented to the same group the 3rd product, a 4 LED lights solar system with a motion sensor light. This can not only charge phones but a tablet and a radio. At this point, the customers had moved closer to get a feel of the radio and try out channels. They talked about lighting their bedroom, kitchen, living area and their neighbours seeing the security light go on and off through the night. They were no longer buying lighting but lifestyle.

Finally, we presented to them the 4th product, a 22′ solar TV, digital, flat screen with an inbuilt DVD player. The customers wanted to know how much it cost and how soon we could deliver. Were there warranty terms in place if they faced technical issues? Then they started making phone calls to secure micro loans to procure the $400 bundle of a TV, 4 LED system and motion sensor light. Financing was no longer a barrier as long as the value proposition was strong and matched their needs,

Economics dictates that a person living on less than a $1 a day using kerosene for lighting, whose fumes equate to smoking a packet of cigarettes a day according to the World Bank, should find more value in lighting than entertainment. But that’s not the value proposition that gets the customers attention.

Our customers desire to climb the energy ladder, they desire products that improve their livelihoods all round. It took listening to our customers to fully understand their needs and design our solutions to adequately meet this needs.

2016-06-09-1465502294-1750288-KidsreadanddrawBarefootPower.jpg

How has that impacted your customers?
Design thinking has delivered satisfaction to our customers. Satisfaction as per their definition that varies greatly from what is perceived through desktop research.

Involving them in the design process has meant that they are highly receptive to our solar products. It has also informed our designing of financing mechanisms to piggy back on what already works in their societies. This has resulted to faster delivery of projects and more impact on households.

How has that approach impacted your business team?
After reaping the fruits of design thinking, you can’t afford to go back. The ease of doing business and implementing projects has made our team choose to focus more on the customer. It sounds like an amazing idea, but what do our customers think? Such questions have become a norm in our strategy meetings. The testimonials of greater impact have fueled our motivation to make a difference and, with a winning model, light up more homes.

What is the biggest challenge you see for African business to become more design oriented and customer obsessed?
African business requires a paradigm shift. Some of us have been lucky enough to get exposed to design thinking and human centeredness and now reap the fruits of it. But most African business entities lack the exposure to the principles and potential they carry to transform business especially in the social enterprise space.

Most of the schooling on social entrepreneurship has been based on non-profit sector ideologies. Some which result to people deliberating on issues concerning people living in rural areas from afar, usually doing the strategy in posh air conditioned hotel conference rooms and then forcing these solutions down rural customers’ throats.

It’s vital to therefore widely educate the private, non-profit, development and government sectors on design thinking and human centeredness business approach as a best practice. The more people hear of the benefits both for the customers and businesses, the more they will adapt these principles.

What design advice would you give to other aspiring African entrepreneurs?
As you design a solution, you must have your customers validate the solution you are offering. There is nothing as frustrating as developing a product then taking it to the people you perceive need it and finding out that they attach no value to it. It’s a waste of time and resources.
There are higher chances of success when prototypes are developed based on feedback from customers. This feedback is vital in the development of a strong value proposition and a sustainable business model.

Design thinking however, is a continuous process. As your customer’s needs change, you as the entrepreneur must be alert enough to note that need for something new and fast enough to create the solution to address it. That’s what tells Apple from Nokia.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Eliminating inequalities needs affirmative action

The Supreme Court has upheld the affirmative action admission policy of University of Texas. Abigail Fisher, a white woman, applied to the University of Texas at Austin in 2008. She sued the university after she was denied admission on the grounds that the university’s race-conscious admissions policy, violated the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

On Thursday, June 23, the Supreme Court ruled that the race-conscious admissions program was constitutional – a decision that the three scholars on our panel welcome. They tell us why existing educational inequalities need considerations of race and ethnicity in admissions.

How else do you eliminate inequality?

Richard J. Reddick is an associate professor in educational administration at University of Texas at Austin.

UT Austin’s history on legal decisions about race in higher education goes back to Sweatt v. Painter (1950), a case that successfully challenged the “separate but equal” doctrine articulated in Plessy v. Ferguson (1898). The landmark case helped pave the way for Brown v. Board of Education (1954), which outlawed racial segregation in education.

The next test, in the Hopwood v. Texas (1996) case, came from the other direction. Cheryl Hopwood was a white applicant who was denied admission. She challenged UT Austin’s use of race in its admissions decisions as unconstitutional. The Fifth Federal Circuit Court of Appeals eliminated the consideration of affirmative action in universities and colleges in Texas. This decision was overruled in 2003.

Fisher, then, was another challenge to the university’s renewed efforts to provide educational opportunity and access to underrepresented students at predominantly white institutions.


UT Austin’s history on legal decisions about race in higher education goes back to Sweatt v. Painter.
qmechanic, CC BY-NC-SA

Opponents of affirmative action often argue that metrics, such as test scores and class rank, that appear to be neutral, should be the method by which to admit students.

These arguments fail to consider the real impact that racial and socioeconomic discrimination has on educational opportunity. School resources and teacher quality differ significantly, and intangibles such as leadership opportunities often depend on subjective criteria such as teacher recommendations.

Furthermore, many students from underrepresented communities confront challenges in navigating school systems. We additionally know that standardized testing can show bias in certain populations.

In other words, these “neutral” measures actually reinforce social inequities.

The most selective institutions of higher education in the nation no longer rely solely on these metrics. They seek out students with a variety of experiences – factors that may not always correspond to test scores and class ranking.

Today’s ruling is a reassurance, as fleeting as it might be, that the massive task of eliminating educational inequality – which correlates to many other forms of inequality – can be supplemented by approaches in college admissions that consider race and ethnicity.

It does not minimize the importance of eradicating racial discrimination in all walks of life: in the words of UT Austin president Greg Fenves, “race continues to matter in American life.”

However, emphasizing the significance of careful, narrowly tailored approaches to enhancing diversity at predominantly white institutions is a victory for the scholars, researchers, administrators and families who have demonstrated how diversity provides significant educational benefits for all students and American society.

What are the implications for other colleges?

Stacy Hawkins is an associate professor at Rutgers University, where she teaches courses in Employment Law and Diversity in the Law.

The Supreme Court’s decision is cause for both celebration and circumspection.

Justice Anthony Kennedy, the court’s moderate swing justice, whose opinion was rightly predicted to be the key to the decision, undoubtedly shocked many by voting for the first time to uphold a race-conscious admissions policy.

However, the decision is more consistent with Justice Kennedy’s prior decisions, notwithstanding the difference in outcome, than might appear at first blush.

On the one hand, Justice Kennedy reaffirmed his commitment to diversity as a compelling educational interest in 21st-century America (a view he expressed in prior cases on diversity in higher education, as well as in primary and secondary schools).

On the other hand, however, Justice Kennedy also reaffirmed his long-standing belief that, notwithstanding this interest, race may play no more a role than is absolutely necessary to achieve the educational benefits of diversity.

In striking this delicate balance, Justice Kennedy sanctioned the University of Texas’ race-conscious admissions policy today, but gave fair warning that the future of this policy is by no means secure.

More important perhaps than the implications of this decision for the University of Texas is what, if any, implications this decision may have for other colleges and universities?

As Justice Kennedy acknowledged, the University of Texas is unique in its use of race to narrowly supplement a plan that admits the overwhelming majority of students (at least 75 percent) on the sole basis of high school class rank without regard to race, a feature that was critical to Justice Kennedy’s approval of the policy.

Thus, the vast majority of colleges and universities may still be left to wonder about the constitutionality of their own race-conscious admissions policies that operate more widely than Texas’ does.

With a similar case against Harvard University currently winding its way through the federal courts, the answer may not be far off.

Affirmative action bans exist in many states

Stella M. Flores is an associate professor of higher education at the Steinhardt School of Culture, Education, and Human Development at New York University.

Demography, economy and diversity are key issues facing the nation’s colleges and universities and should also be a part of their policy design.

In Fisher v. Texas today, Justice Kennedy’s opinion clearly states two outcomes. The first is that the university’s deliberation that race-neutral programs had not achieved their goals was supported by significant statistical and anecdotal evidence.


Admissions policies at universities play a key role in diversifying key areas.
Supreme Court image via www.shutterstock.com

The second is that universities have the obligation to periodically reassess their admissions programming using data to ensure that a plan is narrowly tailored so that race plays no greater role than is necessary to meet its compelling interests. This is in essence an accountability mechanism for universities to follow using data and research.

Admissions policies at universities play an important role in the ability to diversify key fields relevant to the nation’s economy, including law, medicine, STEM, education and public policy, so that they can appropriately reflect and serve the unprecedented demographic expansion facing our country.

The decision ensures that pathways to the nation’s most critical educational and employment fields will stay open.

But there are other considerations and realities that include the following. First, some of the nation’s most racially diverse states will still operate under affirmative bans due to state legislation and referenda. These include California, Florida, Michigan, Arizona and Oklahoma.

Second, there is still a clear need for additional effective policies and efforts beyond a consideration of race in college admissions to address the disconnect between the demographics of the nation and its public K-12 schools and who is represented at selective colleges and universities.

Retracting the use of race nationally would have been a step toward increasing racial and ethnic inequality in schools and society. But we’re in a time where race really matters in this country and in how we learn together as a diverse society in our classrooms. This decision reflects this reality.

The Conversation

Richard J. Reddick, Associate Professor in Educational Administration, University of Texas at Austin; Stacy Hawkins, Associate Professor, Rutgers University, and Stella M Flores, Associate Professor of Higher Education, New York University

This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Dining as Performance Art, Monkeytown Los Angeles

2016-06-23-1466723370-4635192-13509662_10157030887625463_186533568_o.jpg

“That was unbelievable” my friend and I both uttered almost in unison upon leaving Monkeytown – a new dining venture in downtown Los Angeles. To call it a meal would not be fitting. It was an art experience.

Prior to entering the nondescript building on the corner of 21st and Main in downtown LA, a small crowd milled around before being gently ushered into what felt like a dream of a 1970’s living room.

After drinking a magnificent cocktail of made from a potent lime kaffir, we were led into a giant and pristine warehouse with a cube of four 20 foot screens at the center. Dining tables directly below. This dramatic setting was spectacular to behold and gave the experience the feel of having the actual meal of being its own performance.

2016-06-23-1466723418-8211932-13517905_10157030887590463_832702871_o.jpg

What followed was an exquisite orchestration of unique courses which seemed like they were individually curated to match what I was beholding on the screens throughout dinner. The clinking of forks against plates during courses made me aware of the other diners, seated in such a way that we could also observe each other. People were smiling and also looking completely dumbstruck as this experience was clearly as incredible to everyone else it was for me.

The exquisite planning of every element made it feel like immersive theater. Midway through the meal, Mira Billotte, aka White Magic serenaded for exactly 19 minutes with reverb-laden vocal incantations, summoning indecipherable ancient tongues, unyielding to the barriers of human language.

2016-06-23-1466725823-8725692-IMG_20160622_193921430.jpg

The curation of all these details was not arbitrary. Tables were bolted directly to the floor. Servers came through the corners of the space whisking the courses and allowing plenty of time to indulge in the videos. It was so thoughtful in its essential simplicity. At one point a plate of Red Wine Braised Short Rib cut into a perfect cube was put in front of me and I noticed the composition was adjusted like an abstract painting on a plate, the server shifting the plate so that the food was set to the top right — the smallest detail was just a simple example of how much love and thought went into everything.

I left feeling so much gratitude. The beauty of this dining experience with giant screens shared communally with others forced me to think about how often I mindlessly eat while staring at my own tiny screen, watching videos that are a haphazard intrusion in my life, rather than something deliberate and hand picked.

The very best art takes you momentarily out of this world. It transports you somewhere and it leaves you with something new. This experience reminded me how much I love video art. Paired with such a lovingly crafted meal chef, Nick Montgomery is nothing less than a sculptor of organic elements. After this magnificent and profound experience, I decided I would not eat looking at a screen anymore, unless of course I’m at Monkeytown.

*Disclosure: I have been invited to perform at MonkeyTown the week of September 13, and I am Ecstatic*

Link To Purchase Tickets

Discounted 1st month seats are available through July 3rd

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Malia Obama Proves Why She's America's Sweetheart On Our Cheap Celeb Finds List

Malia Obama is one of the most famous 17-year-olds on the planet, but that doesn’t mean she isn’t just like every other teenager

This week, the first daughter stepped out in an affordable (and practical) backpack that costs a cool $68. We have no doubt that Miss Obama has access to designer duds (just think about her mom’s closet), but the down-to-earth teen chose a more low-key option instead. Think this is the backpack she’ll take with her to Harvard?

Check out some other great cheap celeb finds of the week below and let us know which items you’re coveting.

Malia Obama’s backpack

Everlane The Modern Zip Backpack, $68

Reese Witherspoon’s hat

Draper James St. Simons Fedora, $68

Kendall Jenner’s top

H&M off-the-shoulder top, $12

Alessandra Ambrosio’s top

Junk Food AC/DC 3/4 Sleeve Tee, $44

Kylie Jenner’s jumpsuit

 

Puma High Neck Jumpsuit, $89

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

This Is What Happens When You Put Your Phone In Ssssssomeone's Face

As if you needed another reminder not to taunt snakes.

The video above is called “Hey Mister Snake,” but a better name might have been “Hey Lady, Leave Mister Snake Alone.”

“Whoa, you’re mean,” the Alabama woman says. “Are you a bad snake?”

She then approaches Mister Snake and says “I’m gonna touch you on the tail and see what you do.”

Can you guess what happens next?

DON’T BOTHER SNAKES!

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.