2016’s Steam Summer Sale Has Officially Begun

steam_summer_saleLast week we reported that PayPal had confirmed that the Steam Summer Sale of 2016 would begin on the 23rd of June, and sure enough it looks like it has. If you were to pop on over to the Steam website or launch the desktop client, you should be able to see that the summer sale has begun and that pretty much every game has been discounted.

Of course the range of discounts will vary from game to game, with some games getting massive discounts of up to 75% off its regular price, while some developers/publishers aren’t as generous and are only knocking 10-20% off, which we guess is still pretty good since you are still technically saving money in the process.

It also looks like there are virtual reality games that have been put on discount, and given that getting into VR itself can be a pricey investment, it’s good to see that at least some of its content is now slightly more affordable. That being said, the discounts seem to have been applied across the board so if there are games you’ve been meaning to get, now might be a good time to do so.

The sale will last until the 4th of July, 10am PDT, so you’ve got a little over a week to take advantage of these prices while they last.

2016’s Steam Summer Sale Has Officially Begun , original content from Ubergizmo. Read our Copyrights and terms of use.

New Sonic Game Is Currently Being Developed

sonic 25thIf we’re talking about classic video games, during E3 2016 Sony announced that Crash Bandicoot would be returning in the form of remastered copies. However it looks like Crash Bandicoot won’t be the only classic video game animal that will be making a return. It has recently been confirmed that we will be getting a new Sonic game as well.

According to an interview with Famitsu, Sonic Team’s head Takashi Iizuka confirmed that they are working on a new Sonic game. “We at Sonic Team – are developing a completely new game, as well as developing a full movie, actively done by Sony Pictures, and animation on Sonic Boom. We are also ready to improve sponsor ties. The most important thing is not the fact the series survived for 25 years, but how many games was developed. Our goal – add something new and overcome any potential hardships.”

Sonic will be celebrating their 25th anniversary and in the past, SEGA has been dropping hints about a new game that is in the works but it is only now that it has been confirmed. We’re not sure what we can expect from the new game, but as Iizuka mentions, it looks like it will be an all-out effort which includes a movie and an animated show.

In any case the 25th anniversary party will be kicking off on the 22nd of July so maybe we will know more by then, so check back with us for the details.

New Sonic Game Is Currently Being Developed , original content from Ubergizmo. Read our Copyrights and terms of use.

StarCraft 2’s Ladder Mode Will Be Getting Revamped

While Overwatch and Heroes of the Storm are Blizzard’s more recent attempts at trying to create more competitive games, it goes without saying that StarCraft was probably the company’s first and most successful attempt to date, with StarCraft 2 taking it to the next level with new graphics, gameplay, and features.

Obviously the competitive scene has changed and evolved along the way, and it looks like Blizzard has acknowledged that and has recently announced that they will be essentially revamping the ladder mode of StarCraft 2. One of these major changes is that they will be making your Matchmaking Ranking (MMR) more visible.

This allows players to track their progress as well as make it more transparent when it comes to promotions. They are also breaking the league system into tiers to further distinguish a player’s skill. They also announced that Grandmaster League will be getting a daily promotion and demotion system, presumably to encourage players to keep playing and not rest on their laurels.

There are also changes made to the icons and animations to make them more obvious and distinct. These changes aren’t implemented yet but will be in the future, so competitive StarCraft 2 players will want to keep an eye out for it.

StarCraft 2’s Ladder Mode Will Be Getting Revamped , original content from Ubergizmo. Read our Copyrights and terms of use.

Here's A Little Quiz

So here’s my little quiz:

I want you to think about one particular project you are procrastinating – you might have lots, but let’s just pick one – whichever one comes to the top of your head first.

OK? Got a project picked out?

Because we all know that some ideas take a looooooong time to come to fruition. And some plans are waiting for the right time, the right partner, the right technology….

So how to tell the difference between an idea that is still fomenting and an idea that we’re quashing?

Here’s your answer: INTUITION.

Here’s a 2-minute exercise on how to do that:

1) Get quiet inside of your mind, take a few deep breaths, and imagine your project sitting before you. What color is it? What form is it showing you?

2) Take its pulse. Is it vibrant and alive? Or does it feel strangled and weak?

3) Ask your project what it wants you to do. Listen to the answer without reacting. Just take in the information.

4) Say “thank you” to your project and come back to yourself. Make some notes.

If you’re still unsure, then try taking a few baby steps (less than 15 minutes; easily affordable; not too scary) toward your project and see what happens. If the universe comes rushing at you with bushels of support, then GREAT!

Proceed.

And if you make a few starts and it’s all knees-and-elbows and missed calls and weirdness, then drop it — now is not the right time for this project. Write it down and put it in the “Genius Ideas – Fomenting” file.

(You do have a file like that, yes? Or a shoebox? If not, you should get one. It’s important for every idea to have a home

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

SNL Alumni Fred Armisen & Rachel Dratch Reunite for Amy Poehler Comedy

Watch Now: SNL Alumni Fred Armisen & Rachel Dratch Reunite for Amy Poehler Comedy
“Difficult People”

They’re back, and we don’t just mean Billy and Julie. SNL Alumni Fred Armisen and Rachel Dratch are among the star-studded list of celebrities to look out for in Season 2 of “Difficult People.” The Hulu comedy is produced by Amy Poehler (“Saturday Night Live” Alumni and Co-Founder of Upright Citizens Brigade). Both Armisen and Dratch appeared in Season 1. Armisen will likely revise the role of Billy’s brother, Garry. Dratch, on the other hand, may be a new character entirely. The only thing we know about her Season 1 character is that Billy’s poor work ethic made her “late for chemo.”

In the Season 2 trailer below, Dratch appears to be working at an audition with the woman who Billy auditioned in front of from Season 1. There’s only one way to find out what these big stars are up to. Watch “Difficult People” staring July 12th only on Hulu.

SNL Alumni Fred Armisen & Rachel Dratch Reunite for Amy Poehler Comedy

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Bride Signs Lyrics To Her Father-Daughter Dance Song In Touching Video

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

Ohio bride Julie Norton knew she wanted her deaf father, Scott Finkel, to experience their father-daughter dance to Rascal Flatts‘ “My Wish” as fully and completely as possible. Luckily, she came up with the perfect solution: a music video of herself signing the words to the song.

To say the video was well-received at the June 11 nuptials is an understatement. Scott almost stopped dancing altogether to take in the sweet gesture. 

He and Julie’s mother were both born deaf. Julie, whose first language is sign language, originally posted the video on Facebook so that her parents could share it with their friends. She never expected all of the attention she would receive from it.

“My dad is really proud of me,” Julie told The Huffington Post. “I saw it in his eyes during our dance and I can see it when he talks about it.”

Julie came up with the idea for the video right after she and her now-husband Rob got engaged. She put the video together a few days before the wedding by throwing up a sheet in her home office and hitting record. 

Julie also took other measures to ensure her parents could understand everything at the wedding. She asked the family’s favorite sign language interpreter to work the wedding and made sure there were signs around the venue so her parents would know what drinks to order and the like.

“A wedding is supposed to be a bride’s special day, and I wanted to share that with my parents,” Julie said.

She met her husband Rob five-and-a-half years ago on a blind date set up by her best friend and his best friend, who happened to be dating. He popped the question on Christmas Eve 2014, right before the pair headed out to a party.

“I thought for sure he would propose at the party, but he surprised me right before we left with a single present under the Christmas tree,” Julie said. “I opened the present and it was a booklet he made with pictures of us and our pets throughout the years. The last page said ‘FOREVER?’ When I looked up he was on his knee and he asked me if I would marry him!”

Of course, she said “yes,” and their wedding featuring Julie’s sweet video took place near Lake Erie with approximately 160 guests.

Watch above to see Julie’s touching video.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Homeownership In The U.S. Has Plummeted, But Not By Choice

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

The U.S. housing market is bouncing back, but its recovery hasn’t done much for the millions of Americans who want to be homeowners.

The homeownership rate is at its lowest in nearly 50 years, falling to 63.7 percent in 2015. It’s a “decade-long slide” that “is unprecedented in American history,” according to an annual report released Wednesday by Harvard University’s Joint Center for Housing Studies. 

All those former homeowners had to go somewhere, and renters now make up a larger portion of households since the 1960s. The boom is part of what’s driving the housing recovery, according to “The State of the Nation’s Housing,” the report from JCHS.

Some of the rental demand might be attributed to factors like a renewed interest in city living, where renting is more prevalent, and larger demographic shifts, like people waiting longer to get married and have kids. But overall, surveys show that the housing crisis hasn’t changed the fact that Americans overwhelmingly own homes or want to, the report authors write. 

The report says the housing market has substantially recovered, and points to encouraging signs for the near future as incomes, sale prices, construction and household growth increase. 

But while there were more home sales in 2015 than the previous year, there are still very few people buying.  

Here are a few of the major obstacles dragging the national housing recovery and preventing individual families from becoming homeowners, according to the housing report.

Incomes are starting to increase, but they haven’t matched the rise in housing prices.

The median household income went up 1.2 percent in 2014, still lower than any pre-recession level since the mid-1990s, according to the JCHS report. Meanwhile, the median sales price climbed 6.6 percent for new homes and 4.7 percent for existing homes. Low mortgage payments have helped with affordability.

New homes coming on the market aren’t priced or sized for many buyers.

Inventory is low, even with a jump in the number of new homes built last year. And new construction is increasingly catering to wealthier buyers.

Starter homes are hard to come by — about a fifth of new single-family houses were under 1,800 square feet in 2015. The median size was nearly 2,500 square feet, a record high. There is also a shrinking number of homes in the lowest price tier on the market in the largest metro areas, the report notes, citing Zillow data.   

Foreclosures are still a pervasive problem. 

One of the factors keeping the homeownership rate low is ongoing foreclosures that turn owners into renters. There are about twice as many forfeitures now annually as there were before the crisis, when millions of families lost their homes. However, the Harvard researchers say that the foreclosures should continue to decline, helping stabilizing the rate of homeownership in a few years.

They also note that low interest rates are helping keep housing payments more affordable for current homeowners.

Unprecedented student loan debt might make it harder to make the leap to homeownership.

There’s been a huge increase in the number of adults under 40 with student loan debt, and the average amount they owe has nearly doubled.

For most people, student loan payments shouldn’t be enough to shut them out of the housing market. But, the report says, “this may not be true for the nearly one-fifth of indebted young renters whose payments exceed 14 percent of monthly income, a level the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau considers highly burdensome.”

 

If you don’t have perfect credit, it’s tough to qualify for a mortgage.

Lending to homebuyers with credit scores below 700 has fallen since 2010. Despite some federal efforts to expand credit access last year, fewer low-income and minority households are getting loans, according to the report.

High rents make it harder to save enough for a down payment.

The explosion on the rental side of the housing market has pushed vacancy rates down and rents up. More renters than ever before are “cost-burdened,” or putting over 30 percent of their income toward their monthly rent. Thirty percent is the benchmark for what is affordable before households start cutting into other essential expenses.

Those monthly rent checks can mean putting less money toward savings for a home. The report noted that in 2013, the median renter between the ages of 25 and 34 had less than $6,000 in net wealth and cash savings. The median for renters aged 35 to 44 was less than $9,000.  

In addition, federal programs aren’t meeting the increasing need for housing assistance, leaving poor families essentially competing for limited affordable housing options. Local and state efforts to provide rental subsidies and increase the affordable housing supply haven’t been enough to fill in the gap.

It’s not clear if the rise of renting will continue, but the report underscores that financial challenges and the limitations of the market are what’s driving it.

“The question is not so much whether families will want to buy homes in the future, but whether they will be able to do so,” Chris Herbert, the managing director of JCHS, said in a statement. 

_____

Kate Abbey-Lambertz covers sustainable cities, housing and inequality. Tips? Feedback? Send an email or follow her on Twitter.   

_____

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Protesters Fight Cleveland's Plan To Restrict Free Speech During GOP Convention

A federal judge in Cleveland said Thursday that the city’s proposed restrictions on protesters during the Republican National Convention put too much of a squeeze on free speech.

U.S. District Judge James Gwin issued a preliminary injunction that rejects the city’s plan to establish a roughly 3.3-square-mile “event zone” encompassing most of downtown Cleveland. 

The idea was that within the zone, people would need a permit to protest and that those demonstrations would be restricted to specific times and areas out of sight of the Republican delegates. 

But critics argued that the event zone was far too large, sweeping through parts of Cleveland that have nothing to do with the convention. 

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

Gwin, who delivered his opinion orally according to Cleveland.com, cited multiple concerns over the city’s plan, including the “unduly large” zone, tight restrictions on the use of public parks, and time and space limits on would-be protesters.

The city’s rules would limit each permit-holding protest group to a single 50-minute window along a designated parade route. The American Civil Liberties Union of Ohio, along with progressive and conservative activists, said the route was too far from Quicken Loans Arena, the main site of the convention. Delegates would be unlikely to see the demonstrators, which would negate the point of demonstrating. 

In court filings, the ACLU called the restrictions “draconian” and “arbitrary” and said they would effectively preclude the plaintiffs “and thousands of others from making their individual and collective voices heard.”

The city had previously indicated it would appeal Gwin’s order. As of Thursday afternoon, however, the two sides were locked in mediation at the court’s behest, according to Steve David, communications manager for the ACLU of Ohio. Dan Williams, Cleveland’s director of media relations, declined to give details, citing a city policy against discussing ongoing litigation.  

The ACLU of Ohio had filed suit against Cleveland on behalf of three plaintiffs: Citizens for Trump, a grassroots group that supports the presumptive Republican presidential nominee; Organize Ohio, a progressive activist group; and the Northeast Ohio Coalition for the Homeless, a nonprofit. 

“This is one of those examples where you see how those regulations are making no discrimination regardless of people’s political affiliations,” David said. 

Cleveland officials expect the Republican National Convention, which runs July 18 to 21, to attract an estimated 50,000 additional visitors to the city. Both party and city officials are bracing for potential chaos in light of the routinely violent encounters between protesters and supporters at Donald Trump’s rallies and the candidate’s own predictions there would be “riots” if GOP leaders deny him the nomination. 

Notably, guns would be allowed in the event zone, as Cleveland cannot overrule Ohio state laws on open and concealed carry. (The Secret Service has already prohibited guns inside Quicken Loans Arena.)

Items that would be banned in the event zone include metal-tipped umbrellas, coolers, drones, long knives, sabers, swords, nunchucks, bicycle locks and chains, gas masks, canned goods and tennis balls. The restrictions even specify a precise width and thickness for the wooden or plastic sticks of protest signs.

The ACLU noted that the city was even banning soapboxes: The rules prohibit “use of a podium, platform, pedestal, stand or similar object to make a public speech.” 

“Instead, the speakers are allowed to compete to use the single ‘official’ Speakers Platform, which the city will assign by permit for 30-minute increments during limited hours in a park blocks away from the convention,” the ACLU said in court filings.

The event zone would encompass three major sports stadiums — Quicken Loans Arena, the Cleveland Browns Stadium and Progressive Field — as well as the Port of Cleveland, the Cleveland State University campus and a swath of public housing.

The city said that people who have a legitimate need to carry banned items in the zone — including the homeless — would be exempt from enforcement.

“Unfortunately, that requires a lot of discretion on the part of law enforcement. We want to minimize unnecessary contact with police as much as possible,” David said, noting that the Cleveland Police Department is still under court supervision following a damning report by the U.S. Department of Justice over civil rights violations. 

Chief among the ACLU’s requests is that the city shrink the size of the event zone. 

“The fact that Cleveland felt the need to institute this 3-mile zone flies in the face of what they claim to be the ‘least restrictive convention rules’ that we’ve seen,” David said.

The ACLU has pointed out that the 2004 Republican convention in New York City had a smaller secure or “hard” zone but no buffer or event zone beyond it and that the security zone outside the 2008 Democratic convention in Denver was about 0.14 square miles. The largest security zone to date was at the 2012 Republican convention in Tampa, Florida — it encompassed 2.7 square miles, roughly three-quarters the size of Cleveland’s. 

With less than a month to settle the dispute, the hope is that the city and the activists can find common ground in mediation. Cleveland could also appeal the judge’s ruling to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

The GOP's Supreme Court Victory On Immigration Could End Up Helping Hillary Clinton

WASHINGTON, June 23 (Reuters) – Republicans cheered after the U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday thwarted President Barack Obama’s plan to offer millions of undocumented immigrants relief from deportation, but any sense of triumph might last only until the November presidential election.

If recent history is a guide, the stalled cause of immigration reform could energize Hispanic voters in support of likely Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton, hurting Republican Donald Trump’s chances of reaching the White House.

Four years ago, Obama, seeking reelection to a second term, made Republican opposition to reform a central theme of his campaign. He ended up swamping his opponent, Mitt Romney, by almost a 3 to 1 margin among Latino voters, who now make up around 12 percent of the U.S. electorate.

Republican hopes for securing a larger share of that vote this election already seemed grim given Trump’s vow to deport the estimated 11 million immigrants in the country illegally and to build a wall along the southern U.S. border.

Democrats were quick to assail the ruling and voice concern about the fate of the 4 million or so immigrants who were to be shielded from deportation by Obama’s executive action. But it was also clear that they believe the high court has handed them a potent weapon to spur Latinos — the fastest-growing segment of the U.S. electorate — to vote in greater numbers.

The Latino voting bloc is expected to swell to 27.3 million in 2016, up 4 million from 4 years ago.

The prospect of Clinton filling the current vacancy on the top court with a liberal-leading justice who could, potentially, protect immigration-reform programs, may galvanize those voters as well. Republicans in Congress have refused to accept Obama’s pick for the top court to fill the vacancy left by the death of conservative justice Antonin Scalia in February.

The justices’ ruling on Thursday sent the question of the legality of Obama’s program back to a Texas federal court for trial, leaving open the possibility that the matter could return to the high court on appeal at a later date.

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

The court’s decision “just adds fuel to the fire that’s already raging,” said Brad Bannon, a Democratic strategist. “Each of these events raises the intensity and the Latino turnout even more.”

In the wake of the ruling, immigration activists vowed payback in November’s election and staged protests on Thursday.

FIRING UP LATINO VOTERS

A recent survey by Latino Decisions, a polling firm, showed that about half of the U.S. Hispanic electorate showed greater enthusiasm to vote in 2016 as compared to 2012, with support for Obama’s pro-immigrant executive orders running high.

“We should expect similar dynamics this fall, perhaps even more so given the election is likely to determine the ideological direction of the Supreme Court,” said David Damore, an analyst for the firm.

Given Trump’s unpopularity with Latino voters, the question for many Democrats both in and outside the Clinton campaign has been less about attracting the bloc’s support and more about making sure it votes in large enough numbers to help offset Trump’s expected advantage among white voters.

The court’s decision may also help make traditionally Republican states with increasing Hispanic populations such as Arizona more competitive this election, strategists in both parties said.

Reed Galen, a Republican strategist in California, said the ruling could boost Democratic hopes in Latino-heavy battleground states such as Nevada, Colorado, and Florida.

“The issue isn’t getting [Latino voters] fired up,” Galen said. “It’s getting them to show up.”

Galen believes there is little his party can do now to mitigate the damage he believes Trump has done to its appeal among Hispanics. A Republican National Committee “autopsy” report after Romney’s defeat said it was essential for the party to broaden its appeal to Hispanic voters by embracing immigration reform.

“Trump has pushed the envelope on immigration so far for Republicans, I don’t know this is going to be any more damaging,” he said. “The barn’s already been blown up.” 

But Rev. Samuel Rodriguez, the president of the National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference, a conservative advocacy group, disagreed. He said Republicans in Congress could still enact reform this year, which would ward off Trump’s deportation threat while building stronger ties with Latino voters.

“This is the quintessential green light for Republicans to put their money where their mouth is,” Rodriguez said.

Many Republicans were careful on Thursday to applaud the court’s ruling on the grounds that it curtailed what they viewed as an abuse of executive authority by Obama, without delving into the underlying immigration issues.

“The Constitution is clear: The president is not permitted to write laws — only Congress is,” said Paul Ryan, the speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives.

Ryan supports comprehensive immigration reform.

Trump, however, went further, praising the ruling and saying the election now held the key to blocking further illegal immigration.

“The election, and the Supreme Court appointments that come with it will decide whether or not we have a border and, hence, a country,” he said in a statement. He has vowed to reverse Obama’s executive actions on immigration as president.

(Reporting by James Oliphant; editing by Stuart Grudgings)

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Save $7 on Anker's Scary-Powerful USB-C Charging Hub

Anker’s newest charging hub is ostensibly designed as a superior replacement for your USB-C MacBook charger—it’s the first third party charging hub that can feed a full 29W to the laptop, just like its included power brick—but it’s a great accessory if you own any USB-C-powered devices. Today’s $37 deal is an all-time low, down from its usual $44.

Read more…