Democrats Cause Chaos On House Floor As Republicans Pretend Everything Is Fine

WASHINGTON — Democrats took over the House floor Wednesday in a demonstration over Republican leaders’ refusal to hold a vote on gun legislation.

As Democrats loudly chanted “No Bill, No Break,” Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) gaveled the House back into session, nearly 11 hours after the Democratic sit-in began. Democrats earlier in the day began protesting the Republican refusal to take up the so-called No Fly, No Buy legislation, which would bar people on the terrorist watch list from purchasing guns.

It was an incredible scene, as Democrats clogged the House floor, holding the printed names of gun victims over their heads and shouting over the speaker.

Ryan, meanwhile, ignored the protests and read a prepared script to set up a procedural vote, pretending that the House was in order and that Democrats weren’t breaking rules.

When Ryan stepped down from the podium, Democrats chanted “Shame!”

As the vote progressed, Rep. Ted Deutch (D-Fla.) tried to address the House.

“To my Republican friends,” Deutch began. But now it was Republicans’ turn. They shouted Deutch down and didn’t let him speak.

Eventually, as a response, Democrats began singing, “We Shall Overcome.”

The singing was interrupted when presiding officer Mike Simpson (R-Idaho) called the vote, which prompted Democrats to begin a new chant: “Give us a vote!”

The scene capped a day of tumult.

At the end of the vote series, Democrats and Republicans lingered on the House floor, unsure what would happen next.

Democrats broke into sporadic chants of “Shame!” and “No Bill, No Break.” Eventually, they returned to making speeches at the podium, giving no signal they would stop their occupation of the House floor.

Some Republicans hung around, occasionally shouting at them. Rep. Dave Brat (R-Va.) antagonized Democrats for not having a plan to fight terrorism, and Rep. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas) started yelling.

“Radical Islam killed these people!” Gohmert shouted, pointing to a poster of gun violence victims from Orlando.

Gohmert got into a shouting match with Rep. Corrine Brown (D-Fla.) that escalated until Democrats and Republicans broke it up. 

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Protesters Gather Outside U.S. Capitol To Push For Vote On Guns

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

Protesters gathered outside the U.S. Capitol Wednesday night to show support for House Democrats staging a sit-in to pressure Republicans to vote on gun control legislation.

Democrats literally sat down on the floor of the House chamber Wednesday, forcing the House into a temporary recess. Nearly 11 hours after the sit-in began, Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) gaveled the House back into session, but still refused to hold a vote on gun control legislation.

The crowd outside the U.S. Capitol grew through the evening:

At one point, several Democrats — including Rep. John Lewis (D-Ga.), the civil rights icon who led Wednesday’s sit-in — came out to speak to the protesters:

Plenty of food made its way to the protesting Democrats, some thanks to supporters of the cause:

Read more on the sit-in here.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

We Stand Stronger United

2016-06-23-1466651282-5884875-QQcOn8l.jpg
A view taken from Dresden’s town hall of the destroyed Old Town after the allied bombings between February 13 and 15, 1945.

On the eve of one of the biggest potential turning points for modern-day Britain, the dream for an ever closer European union stands at risk. As a European growing up in Germany and studying in England, I always fancied the dream of a united Europe.

As an undergrad in London it took me a while to get used to the oddities of British life. I always thought that London, which carries the economic weight of the island, always cherished a diversity of perspectives and culture. It is a melting pot just like New York.

No matter what the result of the vote tomorrow, I hope that the dream of a more united Europe will be cherished more by future generations and the gift of a peaceful Europe that we taken for granted will not be put at risk so lightly. In a world that grows ever more connected, not only because of the internet, we need to build bridges, not burn them. We forget that for most of its history Europe was at war.

Over the last weeks media outlets and experts from all over the world have discussed – ad nauseam – the consequences and ramifications of the vote tomorrow that will shape the island’s future, and possibly the entire continent. What else is there to say?

British prime minister David Cameron urged his fellow citizens, “quitting Europe is a risk to your family’s future because a vote to leave on Thursday means there is no going back on Friday.” 

Billionaire investor George Soros predicted that a vote to leave the EU would devalue the pound immediately. “A vote to leave could see the week end with a Black Friday,” he wrote in The Guardian yesterday, “and serious consequences for ordinary people.” 

The Bank of England, the Institute for Fiscal Studies and the IMF predicted that the annual income loss per household would be £3,000 to £5,000.

Large parts of the debate have focused on economic questions. Will we be better off if we stay or will we be better off if we leave? It is a selfish and shortsighted question. Any appeals that have been made were based on the economic questions. 
There is nothing wrong with that kind of persuasion. As Founding Father Benjamin Franklin understood, “If you would persuade, appeal to interest not to reason.”

After so many failed attempts and calls by nation-states to leave the EU, it seems the old adage that barking dogs don’t bite still holds true. There is only so much predictive power from polls. It would surprise me if Britain leaves the EU tomorrow, but anything is possible.

Regardless of the outcome, we need a stronger vision for Europe, one that builds upon the foundation made after World War II. Following the war, the late British Prime Minister Winston Churchill was convinced that only a united Europe could guarantee peace. At a speech in Zurich in 1946, he formulated his conclusions:

“There is a remedy which… would in a few years make all Europe… free and… happy. It is to re-create the European family, or as much of it as we can, and to provide it with a structure under which it can dwell in peace, in safety and in freedom. We must build a kind of United States of Europe.”

We need to see ourselves as Europeans first, not members of the individual countries. We need to think like Europeans, and not just maximize the interest of our nation. We need to consider the moral implications, not just the economic ones. As Churchill astutely proclaimed, we must build a kind of United States of Europe. 

That is not to say that we need to model ourselves after the United States entirely. Unfortunately most Europeans don’t see themselves as Europeans. Just like in the Euro Cup, we can co-live peacefully and cooperate with each other without suppressing our different cultures. Britain can remain part of the European Union without compromising its identity.

The idea of a United States of Europe seems idealistic. How can we ever bring it into reality? After World War II there was an opportunity to re-imagine the world, to create a new Europe free from war. It seemed impossible at the time.
 
Yet it all started with how we thought about the future. As Mahatma Gandhi said, “A man is but the product of his thoughts. What he thinks, he becomes.” So it is with people and societies. The implementation wasn’t perfect, but we did it. The peace and prosperity that followed are now so ingrained in everyone’s minds that we can easily forget it. 

If we want to build a new future for Europe, that builds upon that initial foundation, we need to collectively think different.

Don’t think that if Britain votes to stay in the EU, the negative current that has been intellectually dissolving Europe will disappear. Don’t put your faith into politicians and the elite. The world is changing, and becoming more decentralized. As citizens you have more power than you think. 

One thing that will certainly stay intact is the collective and shared memories that bind us together as Europeans. Rather than focus on our differences, lets focus on keeping European influence in the world strong. Just how we benefit from American, African or Asian culture, so can the world benefit from a more united Europe.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

3-D Printers Are Finally Easy Enough You Can Use Them

Nearly every American family’s refrigerator is plastered with our children’s wonderful creations. Children relish “making” naturally. As we grow up, we lose some of this joy of creation, as economics favor purchasing mass-manufactured products over making them ourselves. This monetary calculation is changing.

3-D printers will become mainstream simply because of economics. In the process, they will change us into more sharing, more creative, wealthier and perhaps even happier people.

Here is why:

Recently, costs of 3-D printers plummeted with the introduction of the RepRap (short for self-replicating rapid prototyper), an open-source 3-D printer that could print most of its parts. Since then, hundreds of people have shared their variations of the technology and the innovation churn has become staggering. RepRaps can out-perform what $20,000 commercial plastic 3-D printers could do only a few years ago.

2016-06-23-1466647747-1460387-RepRapLogo.jpg

This may have given some rapid prototyping companies a reason to pause, but after some brief concerns among manufacturers during periods of incredible 3-D printer hype, the general consensus was that such 3-D printers were so technically sophisticated and hard to use that the average consumer would never touch them. However, because the RepRap was open source, dozens of companies all over the world continued to improve on the printers and share their designs, making them easier to use, and pushing down the costs. At Michigan Tech, engineering students build their own 3-D printers for $500 in parts from free plans.

In the same way as aggressive mass-scale sharing improved 3-D printers, people are sharing free and open-source 3-D printable designs of everything from expensive lab equipment and medical marvels to toys and trinkets. The collections of hundreds of thousands of designs are growing exponentially. Every new design that is shared makes owning a 3-D printer that much more valuable.

2016-06-23-1466651207-4447301-Ohwlogo.svg.png

One recent study showed a typical American family can print 20 common household products from a pound of plastic for $18, saving between $300 and $2,000 in purchases. There was nothing special about the 20 products – from cell phone cases to kitchen gadgets. They were just things students in my research group wanted and able to find among free designs already swarming the Internet. The 3-D printed products were better than what is available in any store as they can be customized and personalized. These 20 products could be printed in a weekend and literally pay for the 3-D printer in cash savings. Critics of the study pointed out that the engineering students and faculty doing the study were all 3-D printer experts and that no “normal person” could hope to build a RepRap from scratch. We responded that they do not have to – dozens of companies sell open source pre-assembled RepRaps. Critics countered – they are still way too hard to use.

Perhaps.

Then, this year an open source 3-D printer hit the web that finally silences the critics. Lulzbot designed a RepRap 3-D printer called the TAZ6, whose complete plans are available for free. They literally use a giant cluster of their own printers to fabricate their products. This is interesting in a meta sort of way – but what makes this 3-D printer different is how absurdly easy it is to setup and use.

2016-06-23-1466647077-1948821-TAZ_6_Angle.jpg

To appreciate this, consider the following: About five years ago it took a team of smart engineering undergraduates a summer to setup a RepRap. A few years ago that dropped to 1 undergrad engineer per printer per semester. Even if you bought one pre-assembled it meant investing long hours carefully calibrating it and leveling the print bed. Now, a RepRap can be built from parts and calibrated in a day. Most people will never do that, but they can buy one for about $2500. Out of the box, it is easier to assemble and run than a child’s toy. The TAZ 6 has taken some of the best ideas from the RepRaps that came before it and combined them all. It cleans its own head to prevent clogs, it has automatic bed leveling and calibration, and it comes with a giant list of pre-optimized settings for dozens of materials.

In the “old days”, I advised my students to never leave a printer unattended as print failures were common. The 3-D printers improved, but as recently as last year, I advised students to always watch the first, most critical layer before turning on a movie and ignoring the almost autonomous 3-D printer. Last night, I set up a giant 16 hour print on the TAZ, clicked print and left it before even letting it warm up. Today, I returned to see that it had printed flawlessly and that has nothing to do with my technical background. Anyone can use this 3-D printer. Even you. Also anyone can copy and sell it, because of its open source license. (If this sounds crazy to you, let the CEO of an another open source company explain why open source can bring a competitive advantage). This is why I am quite confident in predicting you will one day have a 3-D printer in your home. Perhaps not this one, or its clone, but you will get one to save money.

You see, our economic 3-D printer study was extremely conservative. You are likely to print the same number of products as we did the first weekend you have a printer. Also, our study used commercial plastic, which at the time cost about $16/pound. It is already about half that. However, the drop in cost for plastic can go much lower. There are also open-source recyclebots, which turns recycled plastic into 3-D printer feedstock for only a nickel per pound in electricity! No sweat shop can compete with that. Yes, there are commercial versions, which are still immature – about where RepRap technology was 5 years ago. They are getting better rapidly because of the innovation in the open hardware community and the list of printable materials is expanding rapidly.

What does this mean for you?

In the not so distant future, you will run your empty plastic containers through the dishwasher, shred and extrude them in a recyclebot to turn them into 3-D printer feedstock. The marginal cost will drop to about zero for you to print a lot of the products you need using free designs on your RepRap 3-D printer (including its upgrades!).

This will save you money, but will not make you happy. The fun part will be in making – creating your own designs, decorating mass-produced bland products, developing derivatives and mash ups of others’ work, personalizing gifts and getting the joy of child-like creation. You will share your designs freely with others and have access to increasingly sophisticated and optimized designs of everything. I cannot wait to see what the refrigerators of America’s future look like as an entire generation of makers are born into households with 3-D printers – where they can make even their most fantastic ideas come to life.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Guy Holds An Explosion In His Hands, Then Films It In Slow Motion

Generally, you don’t want an explosion anywhere near your body. But in the name of science, Destin Sandlin of “Smarter Every Day” used a transparent potato gun as a combustion chamber, which allowed him to set off explosions that he could hold in his hands

He filmed the blasts at 20,000 frames per second, and the resulting slow-motion footage offered an incredible look at how explosions work.

 The close-up view is even more stunning: 

 And then there’s this incredible shot: 

Check out the clip above for a full explanation of how it all works. As Sandlin said, “Science is about to happen!” 

 

(h/t reddit)

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

The German Foreign Minister Should Know Better.

I am struck by the bizarre statement by German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier about his disappointment with “NATO’s provocation of Russia” because of the recent military exercise in Poland. I would totally discard it as a non-issue if it had not come from the foreign minister of the self-proclaimed leader of Europe [please be honest and admit] which also poses as America’s foremost ally in Europe. It is upsetting and smacks of appeasement, which is not a great recipe for success as we have learned in the past. It is not only confusing, but is also very damaging. These are the kind of statements Russian President Putin has been waiting for. He must be popping Russkoe Igristoe [Russian Champagne].

Of course Putin seeing an opening to further split the west blasted the United States immediately demanding that the U.S. stop “interfering in its internal affairs”. What is truly appalling is that Putin is quite comfortable calling a NATO exercise in Poland, “Russia’s internal affair,” knowing full well that though it sounds ridiculous, there are some lining up in Berlin, Brussels and else-where to support him. Recent visists by European leaders to St.Petersburg and their ensuing statements are achieving just one thing: the weakening of Western cohesion precisely at a time the West can ill-afford it. Their statements could have been crafted by the Kremlin. Have these people not been following Russia’s disruptive efforts to intrude upon our societies, the corruption and division it sews, the weaponizing of the migrant crisis, the use of soft power tools as crazy as the football-ultras to create a mess, and the illiberal and extremist attitudes it spreads. Or am I living on a different planet?

I have a very long family history linking us to German social-democracy. My grandmother was a devoted Kautskyist in the early decades of the 20th century. She suffered physical abuse, imprisonment and discrimination, even forced emigration for her stance as an Austro-German Social-Democrat. But in Kautsky she also saw the man who was among the first to reveal the brutality of the Soviet regime, Lenin’s real goal of suppression of dissent, and of the dark Russian future.

There is something especially disturbing about the comment by the German Foreign Minister. Europe is edging away from the firmness which is required if we want to withstand and push back on the Russian pressure to drive a wedge between Western Allies. This statement is even more suspect considering the former leader of the German Social Democrats and former Chancellor, Gerhard Schröder, is a top official at the Russian state gas company Gazprom, the primary supplier of gas to Europe including Germany. One can hardly imagine that the conversation between Schröder and Putin is limited to the future of energy and the friendship between the German and Russian people. One would be hard pressed in this context to believe that Steinmeier’s statement is just a throwaway. Maybe he has not heard the saying “You stop dancing with the Bear when the Bear is tired, not when you are tired”. Obviously Mr.Steinmeier is tired.

In my office hang two reminders of Russia. One is the November 3 issue of the Baltimore Sun with the pictures of the Russian occupation of Budapest in November 1956. But the other is a picture of me standing next to Jurij Gagarin in 1962, my hero who has inspired me to do things in my own life. It is a reminder of the darker as well as the brighter side of Russia, the incredible achievements of the Russian people. Gagarin makes me think every day of how Russia could be part of the solution, not part of the problem. Great things are being lost because of a kleptocratic system intent on stealing from its people and making the disrupting of democracies as its number one priority.

Russia is intensively trying to impose its corrupt and repressive model on members of the European Union, infiltrating and corrupting the political and economic elites of Europe. The naïveté of Western governments is striking. Why isn’t the German foreign minister just as worried about the health of democracy within the European Union and the destructive intrusion by Russia into our midst? Germany needs to listen to others and first and foremost those who are the most vulnerable within the European Union and NATO. Germany feels safe, others don’t. In a comment to a leading American analyst on why Germany does not push back on the decline of de-mocracy in Hungary, a Merkel aid quipped that “Hungary is irrelevant”. Wrong. No member of NATO or the European Union is irrelevant.Hungarians cared about the desire of East Germans to live in freedom in 1989. It is time to remember.

NATO, the U.S. and its allies don’t need Russian permission to conduct exercises; Russia doesn’t get a vote and Germany, a NATO ally implying that it should, is a bad idea. Perhaps Putin believes that these exercises are like his own; precursors to invasions of Georgia and Ukraine. This is not provocation. On the contrary, as the Foreign Minister of Lithuania, Linas Linkevicius famously said “Sometimes inaction is provocation”.

Mr. Steinmeier should listen carefully to those countries that he rather not hear instead of focusing on short-term German interests that will harm our ability to create a strong and united Europe. His statement damages western cohesion. We must take a strong stance and remain unified as democracies in the face of attacks on our democratic way of life, whether by Russia or extremist Islam. The foundation of solid long-term relationship with Russia can only be based on strength, clarity and transatlantic unity. Wishy-washy positions, dialogue for the sake of dialogue is unac-eptable. It is pure cynicism to preach openness, tolerance, equality, freedom and the rule of law at home, but put all that on the back-burner abroad.

Germans need to remember: they bear a huge responsibility for the world order which kept nations like mine behind the Iron Curtain for almost fifty years. They have a shared responsibility to help the countries of Eastern Europe catch up with lost time. Appeasing Mr.Putin is not the way to do it.

Mr.Steinmeier should know better.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

The Voices Missing From The Debate

This summer Congress will debate and vote on numerous issues of importance to veterans including funding levels for the VA, troop levels in Afghanistan and Iraq, how to combat ISIS, critical job placement programs for veterans and much more.

Of course, we’ll hear the usual rhetoric from Senators and Congressmen and women, only heightened in election years, about honoring our nation’s heroes. But what we won’t see or hear are policy solutions studied and written by the very people these policies impact most… veterans.

There are more than 2.5 million veterans of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars returning home from over-seas deployment. Many recognize how decisions made in Congress greatly impact and have long-lasting effects on their lives as well as the lives of their family and friends. At the same time, they see the lowest percentage of veterans in Congress in generations.

In short, their experience is underrepresented.

For years, Congressional offices have expressed a desire to add veterans to their team, but veterans’ lack of Hill experience has been an obstacle.

To combat this problem, the VetVoice Foundation, a non-profit, non-partisan 501(c)(3) organization with over 450,000 veteran and veteran family members, have committed our organization to the first-of-its-kind veterans fellowship on Capitol Hill.

With a generous gift from the Corvias Foundation, we’ve been able to recruit, train, support and place veterans in Congressional offices for a nine-month period and begin the process of building a bench of high quality veterans who are experienced in how Congress works and who understand how public and foreign policy is developed, authorized and executed.

While many companies and organizations talk a good game about helping our nation’s heroes, few step up to the plate like the Corvias Foundation has.

Because of the Corvias Foundation, we have been able to ensure that our veteran fellows earned a living wage so they could afford to accept positions in Congressional offices at no cost to the offices.

Our first class of fellows in the offices of Senators Brown, Ernst, Murphy, Manchin, and Donnelly will be winding down their fellowships over the next few months. Thanks to the opportunity these Senators gave our veterans, they have gained experience to be better positioned to develop their careers. This is not only benefiting these five veterans, but also the offices they are working in and the country they are once again serving – this time in a suit, not a uniform.

As our first class of fellows has has already shown, 21st century veterans are a great asset on Capitol Hill and provide first-hand accounts that are helpful to developing legislation and programs that support our veterans and members of the armed forces and in the development of national security policy.

Soon we will be recruiting our next class of fellows to continue this program to make sure veterans’ voices are heard on Capitol Hill. One thing the last nine months has shown us is that we need more, not fewer, veterans on the Hill.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

How Donald Lost His Mojo

When political historians look back on the 2016 presidential contest, they’ll likely consider May 4th to the present as the decisive period. On May 4th, Donald Trump won the Indiana Republican primary; his last competitor, Ted Cruz, dropped out; and the press labeled Trump the presumptive GOP candidate. A week later, Trump got a polls “bump” and was effectively tied with Hillary Clinton. Then Donald lost his mojo.

At the moment, Hillary Clinton leads Donald Trump by 7.5 percent in the Huffington Post Poll of Polls and the spread increases daily. Clinton also leads in fundraising and is generally credited with having a more effective campaign. Clinton was the first to run TV ads in critical swing states.

What happened to Trump? How did he squander his advantage?

Donald didn’t adjust. It’s a political axiom that it takes different tactics to win a general election for president than it does to win a primary election – it’s one thing to win over Party partisans and quite another to win over the general population. Trump didn’t recognize this and, therefore, kept running the same style of campaign and employing the same tactics.

Trump doesn’t have a campaign infrastructure because he hasn’t raised the money necessary. A recent Huffington Post article said that Trump only has 70 paid staff members compared to Clinton’s 732. The New York Times reported that, in this 45 day period, Trump has yet to run a TV ad; Clinton and surrogates have spent $25.5 M on ads.

A Time Magazine article observed:

[Trump] has planned no big fundraising blitz or major TV ad campaign for the fall. He has little interest in the latest advances in data analysis or digital strategy. And despite a personal fortune that runs into the billions, Trump does not want to hire a big staff in the states to get out the vote and to court local leaders. He prefers to talk to reporters and surrogates himself, betting on his own gut and guile. “Trump’s campaign is entirely ad hoc. It’s a guerilla operation built on the concept of mass communication.”

On June 20th, Trump fired his campaign manager, Corey Lewandowski.

Donald lost focus. For the first three weeks after he won the GOP nomination, Trump kept doing what he had been doing – emphasizing key Trump issues such as immigration and attacking Hillary Clinton. Then he lost focus. On May 27th, a Federal judge in a civil case involving Trump “University” ordered the depositions made public. The next day, Trump used a California campaign speech to attack the judge, accusing him of bias because the judge’s parents emigrated from Mexico.

When asked about his comments, Trump doubled down. In a May 31st press conference Trump repeated his charges against the judge and attacked the press, in general.

On June 2nd, Hillary Clinton gave what she had labeled a foreign policy speech. It was a prolonged attack on Trump. Clinton declared Trump temperamentally unfit to be President. She declared his ideas as “dangerously incoherent,” adding that they consisted of “a series of bizarre rants, personal feuds, and outright lies.” Trump was so obsessed with the “Trump University” case that he didn’t respond to Clinton.

Donald blew his opportunity to get back on course. Presidential campaigns take a long time and external events usually present an opportunity for course correction. On June 12th there was a horrendous shooting spree in an Orlando gay nightclub. Because the killer was an American Muslim, the event was an opportunity for Trump to trumpet his signature issues: domestic security, immigration reform, and Muslim ban.

On June 12th Trump tweeted: “Appreciate the congrats for being right on radical Islamic terrorism.” On June 13th, Trump responded with a speech so over-the-top that it was universally panned. Politico reported a spot poll: 51 percent of respondents did not like the way Trump responded to the Orlando massacre, while only 25 percent approved.

Donald failed to united Republicans. After he secured the nomination, Trump had a chance to unite Republicans. He didn’t do this. He got a lukewarm endorsement from Mitch McConnell and Paul Ryan and did not garner the support of Republican elders such as George W. Bush and Mitt Romney.

On May 7th Trump boasted he could win the presidency without unifying the Republican Party: “‘I’m very different than everybody else, perhaps, that’s ever run for office.”

Donald Trump has made mistakes and they’ve cost him. A recent Washington Post/ABC News poll found that 70 percent of respondents had an unfavorable view of Donald Trump versus 29 percent favorable, a historic low.

The results are worse by demographic sector. For example, in a CNN poll 73 percent of female voters said they had a negative view of Trump. A recent Gallup Poll provided additional information on the gender gap. Non-White women favor Clinton by 56 points; White women favor Clinton by 2 points.

Donald has lost his mojo and, quite possibly, the election.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

You Will Never Be As Ecstatic As This Woman Delivering Pizzas To Rep. John Lewis

Rep. John Lewis (D-Ga.), a civil rights icon who led historic sit-ins in the 1960s, staged another sit-in on the floor of the House of Representatives Wednesday to pressure Republicans to bring up a vote on gun control legislation.

People showed their support for Lewis in a variety of ways: Fellow House Democrats sat with him on the House floor; Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) brought donuts; protesters gathered outside the U.S. Capitol.

And according to HuffPost’s Jennifer Bendery, someone in California paid $344 to deliver pizzas to Lewis. And boy, was the woman who got to deliver them ecstatic:

Read more on the House Dems’ sit-in here.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Attention Star Wars Fans, Would You Like to Own a X1 Starfighter?

2016-06-23-1466652176-1542250-X1Starfighter.jpg

Perhaps you have heard of this new indie movie project – Star Wars? A nice little movie series which is generating a little bit of buzz…

Yes, The World Is Officially Star Wars Crazy

Of course the truth is, Star Wars excitement is at a fever pitch. Toy manufactures have been trying to capitalize on Star Wars mania by creating endless Star Wars themed toys. While many of these toys leave us wishing we had a light saber to destroy them, the new Air Hogs RC Star Wars Darth Vader’s TIE Advanced x1 Starfighter is actually very impressive.

Please watch our full video review of the X1 Starfighter in action –

Feel What It Is Like to Join The Dark Side

I always tell the kids, in real life be a good and caring person. When it comes to playing with toys, sometimes it is fun to see what it would be like to venture to the dark side.

Here is the full description of the Star Wars RC X1 Starfighter From Air Hogs –

“It’s your turn to pilot Darth Vader’s distinctive experimental TIE Fighter from Star Wars Episode IV: A New Hope. The 2.4Ghz communication provides high-performance remote control handling for quick, precise manoeuvring. And with a long-distance flying range of up to 250-feet you’re able to run down Rebel X-Wing Starfighters anywhere in the skies.”

If You Have Star Wars Fans In The House, This Is A No Brainer

As the video shows, the X1 Starfighter is fun to fly and holds up well to crashes. If you have Star Wars fans in the house, they will love the Air Hogs RC X1 Starfighter.

Want to see more video product reviews?
Check out the Dad Does YouTube Channel and the Dad Does Blog. Follow Dad Does on Twitter and Facebook.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.