Mitt Romney Says He May Vote For His Wife Instead Of Donald Trump

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

Mitt Romney still can’t see himself voting for presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump. However, he can’t bring himself to vote for the Democratic counterpart, Hillary Clinton, either.

But the 2012 GOP nominee has a solution: putting his own wife’s name on the ballot.

“It’s a matter of personal conscience,” Romney told CBS News’ John Dickerson Wednesday at the Aspen Ideas Festival. “I can’t vote for either of those two people.”

Romney explained that he simply cannot get behind Trump’s divisive character.

“Our nominee is saying, ‘Hey look it’s these people here. It’s these Mexicans coming across the border… it’s them, and it’s Muslims,” he said. “And unfortunately, I’m afraid that the things Mr. Trump has said have been unfortunately branding of our party in a negative way.”

He expressed his opposition to Clinton in less dramatic terms. “Hillary Clinton is wrong on every issue, but she’s wrong within the normal parameters,” Romney said.

Ann Romney, however, would be “an ideal president,” he added. 

Romney reiterated that he would not run as a presidential candidate this year, despite calls from family members to make a last-minute entrance into the election cycle. “That door is closed unless both candidates come to me and ask me to please save them,” he joked. 

Clinton leads Trump 45.5 percent to 38.6 percent, according to HuffPost Pollster’s polling average.

Editor’s note: Donald Trump regularly incites political violence and is a serial liarrampant xenophoberacistmisogynist and birther who has repeatedly pledged to ban all Muslims — 1.6 billion members of an entire religion — from entering the U.S.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

The Corporate Vortex: We're Not In Sedona Anymore

I recently went back to Corporate America. No, I’m not giving up my writing (obviously), but it was time to move forward with a new experience.

Over the past five years, I’ve immersed myself in teaching, writing and speaking about how to create a workplace where people are energized, feel good and are happy. And how to create a work-life people love. Through my books and writings, I’ve gained a reputation as the “energy girl” who pushes the envelope with discussion topics like spirituality, meditation, and mindfulness at work. Now it’s time to live it–an author is only as good as the sum of their experiences.

Since jumping back into the corporate vortex (that is certainly not Sedona, AZ) here’s what I’ve learned. “Living it” is fucking hard! You can read, write and practice mindfulness techniques sunrise to sunset, but at the end of the day living it is far from easy.

I have found myself becoming my own worst client–unexplained depression, exhaustion, no time for self and a spinning mind that replays people’s perceptions of me and my performance. I don’t tell anyone this–it’s my little secret. On the outside, I look like a professional confident woman people look up to. How little they know. Oh, and I automatically gained 10 pounds! How did that happen? Yep, cafeteria food, long hours at my desk, no time to workout and lack of sleep. Hell, I’m living the American dream!

Last week I had a “come to Jesus, come to Buddha moment.” A friend of mine so generously held up a mirror and said, “Wake the fuck up!” Okay, he was a bit more polished than that, but I heard, “Wake the fuck up!”.

Simply put, he reminded me that I had it all backwards. I’ve been giving all my energy, “my all” to this company and giving nothing to myself. (Now listen up, this is key…) I’ve been fitting my entire life into my corporate job rather than fitting my corporate job into my life. So much so, that for the past four months I’ve literally given up everything that I love–everything that makes my soul sing. For god sakes, I even gave up writing!

I’m not going to pretend that after one conversation I’m fixed and have all the answers. On the contrary… I’ve just begun my journey forward, and I have no doubt that every step forward will be a lesson that we’ll all learn from together (because I’m going to write about it).

You see, I’m on a mission. Together, we’re going to crack this nut! We’re going to figure out how to live as healthy well-balanced spiritual beings in a corporate world that’s anything but balanced or spiritual. We’re going to learn how to master mindfulness in the workplace and reclaim our calm–reclaim our life!

Lesson 1: My personal mission is to improve the health and wellbeing of humanity by making the power of good the driving force in business throughout the world. The “power of good” won’t come from forcing change in corporate process and operating models. The power of good will happen when we all figure out how to live as healthy well-balanced spiritual beings in a corporate vortex that is anything but spiritual and well-balanced.

Bring it on Universe! We’re ready.

Gina Soleil, is a speaker and acclaimed author of Fuel Your Business: How to energize people, ignite action and drive profit. She blogs and speaks about how to create a business where people are energized, feel good and are happy. Visit GinaSoleil.com and follow her on Twitter @GinaSoleilWorld.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

From Parodies to Politics: Forbes Announces Second Round Of Speakers For Under 30 Summit

In the past few years, Forbes’ Under 30 Summit has become an annual staple for young businesspeople — a place where entrepreneurial twenty-somethings gather to exchange ideas, opportunities, experiences, and connections.

This morning, the event, which is expected to attract over 5,000 fresh-faced entrepreneurs from all over the globe, has announced its second round of speakers. The eclectic crowd in this year’s pool of speakers — triple the size of last year’s — is sure to make this year’s Summit more diverse than ever.

2016-06-29-1467216757-2487065-huff_lane.jpg
Forbes Editor Randall Lane

Joining Massachusetts governor Charlie Baker, CEO of Breyer Capital Jim Breyer, and Model Chrissy Teigen — all of whom were announced earlier this month in the first round of speakers — will include Shark Tank alums, YouTube personalities, and gun control advocates.

As one might expect in a summit composed mostly of millennials, many of these speakers have found success on digital platforms. For instance, on the list are two YouTube sensations: 20-year-old Bethany Mota, whose YouTube channel spurred her rise to success as a fashion entrepreneur; and 30-year-old Bart Baker, the self-proclaimed “king of music video parodies.”

Similarly, plenty of founders and developers of mobile apps will be featured prominently. Notably, Brian Wong, founder of Kiip — an app that allows advertisers to target users at key moments, such as level-ups while playing virtual games — is slated to speak. Along with him will be Sam Chaudhary, a high school teacher turned entrepreneur whose classroom management software ClassDojo is used in 2 out of 3 schools nationwide.

2016-06-29-1467217410-7220887-_GD182701.jpgFood connoisseurs attending the event should have been delighted by the first round of speakers, which included the Executive Director of the Food Network’s South Beach and NYC Wine & Food Festivals, Lee Schrager. Foodies, whet your appetites: the second round of speakers will bring you Celebrity Chef and Restaurateur Bobby Flay, who remains one of the best-known chefs worldwide since his 1994 debut on the Food Network.

Forbes has made it clear that they won’t be shying away from politics during this year’s Summit. Along with both the governor of Massachusetts and the mayor of Boston, the Summit will feature Amani Al-Khatahtbeh, Founder of MuslimGirl.net, whose recent speech on representation of minorities and whitewashing in the media has gone viral on Facebook.

Touching upon similar themes of social justice and equality — this time, in terms of feminism and female economic empowerment — the Summit will include entrepreneur Sallie Krawcheck, former Citigroup CFO and Co-Founder of Ellevest, a digital investment platform designed specifically for women.

Finally, attendees will hear from Colin Goddard, Senior Policy Advocate at Everytown for Gun Safety, a nonprofit organization dedicated to passing stricter gun control laws in the United States. Following this month’s mass shooting in Orlando — the most deadly mass shooting in U.S. history — Goddard’s appearance is particularly timely.

2016-06-29-1467217703-218424-AerialofForbesUnder30FoodFestival.jpgIn addition to the extensive list of speakers — over 200 in total! — Forbes will also create an Under 30 Village in City Hall Plaza as a meeting point for all summit participants to network, connect with speakers, eat, drink, and watch presentations and performances. It’s certain to be an action-packed few days: the Summit will also feature an Innovation Showcase for startups, a Recruitment Fair with scores of employers, new product demonstrations such as breakthroughs in virtual reality, and more.

This year’s Summit will take place in Boston over the span of 4 days, from October 16th – 19th. The culture of the summit is always fertile ground for bold ideas and broad perspectives: as Forbes editor Randall Lane puts it, “[The summit] is not about a vertical industry; it’s about a horizontal mindset.” This year, with its mix of traditional entrepreneurs, technological innovators, and political changemakers, the 2016 Summit is destined to be the biggest one yet, in terms of both size and scope.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

This is what it looks like when government just works

Both sides of the Brexit debate would contend that our system of government is deeply damaged, and that especially the bond of trust between government and citizens has become imperilled.

But what does it look like when government works the way it’s supposed to? Quick to act, practical in its thinking, momentous in its impact?

Look no further than the dispute about microbeads, the tiny bits of plastic making headlines all over the world for killing fish. The beads are used as abrasives and exfoliants in hundreds of toothpastes, face scrubs and body washes, and each use can send tens of thousands down the pipes and out into the sea.

In the US alone, some 11billion microbeads are pumped into the nation’s waters every day. Although not toxic in themselves, they absorb harmful chemicals before being swallowed by fish, bringing the toxins into the food chain.

A ban was first proposed in Europe in 2013 and has been supported by the governments of half a dozen EU countries, including the Netherlands, Sweden, Austria, Italy and – as of last week – the UK, so far to no avail. The wrangling continues as some countries and industry groups lobby instead for the ban to be voluntary.

Meanwhile, an American ban has sailed unopposed through the notoriously partisan House of Representatives, been signed by Barack Obama and comes into force next year. Initially proposed by a Democrat, it went through the Republican-controlled House under ‘suspension of the rules’ – a set of measures for non-controversial legislation, and passed the Senate a week later by unanimous consent.

How was it possible?

1. The bill’s proponent kept it out of partisan politics

Although the ban was conceived by the environmental staff of Democrat Frank Pallone and was proposed by him, it was carried through in collaboration with the Republican Fred Upton, both of them acting on the concerns of their immediate constituents. Pallone is from a coastal district in New Jersey and made his name campaigning for environmental protection, while Upton’s district is in Michigan, where the Great Lakes had become the most prominent site for reports on microbead pollution.

Highly publicised studies by the State University of New York found up to a million microbeads per square mile of the Lakes, and debate on the topic was focussed there.

Moreover, Pallone and Upton were in a position to make sure their bipartisan bill got traction: it fell under the remit of the Energy and Commerce Committee, of which Upton is the chair and Pallone is the most senior Democrat.

2. They got the influencers on side

The team won the unlikely support of both the environmental and industry lobbies. While the environmental groups were natural allies, the main industry group, the Personal Care Products Council, backed the ban in the name of stability. That was because the alternative was an unmanageable hodgepodge of legislation at the state and county levels, each with its own definition of which microbeads were to be banned and its own timeline for removing them.

Illinois – another Great Lakes state – passed a ban just as the federal ban was first proposed, and more than half the other states were considering them. So industry groups were happy to collaborate on and support a single federal ban that would be strong enough to satisfy the environmental concerns while giving them time to remove the microbeads from their production lines.

3. The public conversation worked the way it’s supposed to

By the time Pallone first proposed the bill, the momentum for a ban on what would otherwise be an obscure industrial ingredient had already been built. NGOs around the world had been campaigning against them for several years, and in 2013 the United Nations Environment Program had been convinced to support an international smartphone app that let shoppers scan the products on supermarket shelves for whether they contained microbeads.

That meant that by the time the ban was proposed, all the major companies had announced initiatives to phase them out. It also meant that the scientific evidence for a ban had already been collected. The studies carried out in the Great Lakes came to the attention to the public servants in Pallone’s office through reports on NPR and other outlets, and they then contacted the academics cited in them.

Overall, the microbead ban demonstrates how smoothly the democratic system can work. Reports on its passage have been few, because there is often little to say when nothing goes wrong. As the old dictum has it, ‘Happiness writes white.’ Nonetheless, the ban should and has motivated governments in Europe, Canada and elsewhere to hurry up their progress towards bans of their own. Although microbeads are only a small part of the 8million tonnes of plastic that are pumped into the world’s oceans each year, the US ban shows that the much-maligned machinery of government is not only the only body capable of solving problems like this, but is already doing so.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Pornosophy: In Praise of Objectification

2016-06-29-1467200298-6372420-Monroe_in_1952_larger.jpg
Objectification is a much maligned intention. Everybody resists the idea of being objectified. Certainly feminism rails against the objectification of women, though few feminists express equal concern about the objectification of fetching looking studs. One of the objections is that by singling out a women on the basis of her looks you’re turning her into a piece of meat, something that’s not better than a hamburger. Even models complain about being enslaved to their good looks. They want to be loved for their minds as well as their bodies. But isn’t this the point? Isn’t everything an object? Let’s say we ignore the allure of beauty, what then do you do about a beautiful sensibility? How do you handle the person with a horrible external appearance, but a beautiful core? If you love the Hunchback of Notre Dame for his mind, are you not still objectifying his inner self? Get out. Once a person fails to meet up to the highest standards of physical beauty, you go down a list which includes brainpower and sensibility. However what makes these other qualities less examples of objectification say tits and ass or in the case of a male, well developed pectorals and a bulging package downstairs? You’re locked into your mind as well as your body and what the two have in common is that there’s no way out.

Marilyn Monroe (New York Sunday News)

{This was originally posted to The Screaming Pope, Francis Levy’s blog of rants and reactions to contemporary politics, art and culture}

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Fly High

They pack up their trunkies and teddy bears, pack up all of their precious treasures and start the countdown weeks in advance. How many more sleeps until we see Nana? Are we going on the plane today? Will we see snow and rain? These are the tiniest of travelers, ex-pat children who every summer make their journeys back to the lands of their births, or the countries of their parent’s birth. Their second life begins when school lets out for the summer. The preparation, the excitement, the plans. Family on the other side are electric with anticipation. Aunties, grandpas, cousins — all waiting, all counting, all hoping. But this year there is something else crackling alongside the expectation — something deeper, something darker, something that doesn’t taste as sweet as other years. This something has been blowing along in the wind, getting stronger and more sinister. I sensed it after the shootings in Paris, I tasted it when the plane went missing from Charles De Gaulle and I heard it this morning in the soft voice of my 7-year-old. Sitting in the back seat, half listening to the radio on the way to school she heard something that made her blue eyes blink behind her little glasses. An attack in Turkey! Chaos at Istanbul airport. I looked at her in the mirror, I saw realization dawn on her beautiful face. Those big eyes filled with tears. Her favourite boy is from Turkey, she knew he was flying home for the summer on this very day. She had played in his house yesterday, baked cookies with him, played the piano with him. My baby girl is 7, and she has felt fear. How many other children? Chubby legs, grazed knees, wide eyes. The terror of terrorism. Tonight we looked through her class year book and we said a little prayer for every little friend, that no matter where they are the world over, love will win out.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Help Is Needed For International Adoptees Caught In A Legal — And Stateless — Quagmire

• Adoption provides children a “better” life with more opportunities, right?

• There are no differences in how adopted children are loved, cared for and especially in regards to their legal rights, right?

2016-06-29-1467168194-9297571-sADOPTIONsmall.jpg

• Legally adopted children are the full legal children of their adoptive parents, and entitled to all the rights and responsibilities as any other children, right?

• Adoptees are “the same as if” they were born in to their families, right?

It is not always so.

Adoptees – including those born in this country and therefore naturalized citizens – are denied access to their own original birth certificate in the majority of US states. These discriminatory laws sealing birth certificates from the person named therein, apply ONLY to adopted citizens and thus are contradictory to the 14th amendment’s equal protection clause which guarantees that all laws apply equally to all citizens.

Those adopted internationally face additional difficulties, in particular challenges to their citizenship.

The United States began Intercountry Adoption (ICA) in the early 1940s and adopts more children from abroad than any other country. Transnational adoptions grew in popularity following the World War II — at least 50,000 took place from 1948 to 1969 with the Holt agency created in 1956 specifically to adopt “war orphans” from Korea.

In February I wrote about the case of Adam Crapser. In April, I revisited the plight of this man, who had been abused by this adopters and was about to be deported. As of this writing, Adam, is being held in the Tacoma Northwest Detention Center.

Adam Crapser, former barbershop owner and auto-insurance claims estimator, husband and father, became the face of U.S. adoptees battling against deportation. He is far from the only one.

Like Adam, thousands of international adoptees do not have U.S. citizenship, though American agencies approved their entry, bringing these children to here to become legal members of their families and full-fledged Americans. Some adoptees have been deported back to South Korea, a country they do not remember and whose language and culture are unknown to these American-raised persons.

Following are vignettes of some of the thousands of others whose lives are impacted by a major loophole in the Child Citizenship Act (CCA).

Mike

“Mike” arrived in the U.S. when he was 8, as part of what is known as the greatest humanitarian act of all times, also known as Operation Babylift.

He learned at 29 years of age that he was not a U.S. citizen and was an “illegal alien.”

“I spent the next 13 years of my life struggling to establish my status in the United States and struggling to understand what went wrong. I had my adoption decree, birth certificate, my high school diploma, my honorable discharge paperwork from the United States Air Force, college degree and 20 years of memories of a life in America. How could I NOT be a U.S. citizen?”

Aimee

Aimee was adopted from Korea on an IR-4 visa. Raised in Minnesota, Aimee was shocked to learn from INS that she was not naturalized and had an expired resident status.

Her adoptive parents claimed that they didn’t know about the need for naturalization but it is difficult to know for sure as they were emotionally abusive, even threatening to send her back to Korea.

A permanent citizen now, but her lack of legal citizenship status and green card expiration prevented her from getting an “above-the-table” job and she was not able to afford the exorbitant renewal fees. She struggled with homelessness, and unstable employment for many years.

Ella

Ella and her brother were adopted from Korea in 1956. She left her adoptive family when she was 15 due to abuse, and had no idea there was any problem regarding her citizenship until she was 60 years of age.

Ella worked as an electrician at nuclear plants and military bases and lived her life as a proud U.S. citizen. Married 33 years, Ella applied for survivorship benefits after her husband died.

“The Social Security office told me they could do nothing for my situation. I asked my Senator’s office to get involved when I was running out of money and afraid of losing my home. I have received a green card and am waiting for my citizenship application, interviews, and exams to be completed.

“I have spent so much time, emotional pain, and money trying to prove my citizenship. “

Jack

Jack also came to the US s part of Operation Babylift during the Vietnam War. His American parents were volunteering for the Red Cross in Guam and adopted him there in 1975. His adoption paperwork was somehow lost during the naturalization process.

“My parents thought the process had been completed, as there was no indication of a problem. I have been raised here all my life by a wonderful family who never saw me as their adoptive child but their own child.

“The US is my home and I am an American citizen of the United States, even if a piece of paper says otherwise. I attended college, raised 2 children, and paid my taxes as a citizen.

“Now I am in a precarious state and am concerned about my citizenship and employment status. I am at risk of being deported and losing all that I know to be my life in the United States.”

Lisa

Lisa and her sister were adopted from an orphanage in Iran at two years of age. Her adoptive father lived and worked in Iran, her father was a retired Lieutenant Colonel and a Prisoner of War in the Air Force. She arrived in the US in 1973 with my parents at the age of 3 and was legally adopted.

“In 2008 I met with an immigration officer to see why I was having complications in obtaining a passport. It was suggested I complete the N600 form to petition for citizenship and seek legal counsel. I spent many years seeking legal counsel from various attorneys with disastrous results. I was told numerous times that I could be deported to Iran despite not being culturally Iranian and having been raised as an American and a Christian. As you can imagine it scared me immensely.

“I followed the paper trail as best as I could. I found paperwork showing my father hired an immigration attorney and paid for services despite immigration telling me there was no activity on my file since I arrived in the US. The paper trail went cold because the attorney had retired and my adoptive father passed away in 2001. It is difficult to comprehend how my status can be an issue since I carried a military ID and had military benefits as a child. Social Security has even told me to file as a citizen for taxes, voting, etc.

“I live in fear that my entire life will collapse. My parents gave me a new and exciting start to life and I could never imagine that it could all be taken away from me.”

Stacey

Like many internationally adopted persons, Stacey found out she was not a U.S. citizen about five years ago when she applied for a passport to return to Korea.

“I was shocked when the first lawyer I spoke with recommended I live undercover instead of filing paperwork for citizenship. I was told the process of filing would alert Immigration to the many years I had voted and claimed I was a US citizen.

“As an adoptee and a mom to two daughters, the thought of being deported and losing them was extremely unnerving. I was also worried about losing my job if my employers ever found out about my status. I was scared but also angered by the injustice of it all. I wasn’t sure who I was most mad at – my parents for assuming I was a citizen, the adoption agency for not following up with my parents, or the Child Citizenship Act for granting citizenship for some adoptees but excluding me.

“Luckily for me, I found another immigration lawyer, and with their help I am now a permanent resident. My heart goes out to other adoptees that are still living in silent fear of deportation.”

Angela

Angela was allegedly a foundling in South Korea. Her problems began when she turned 27 and moved to the Southwest and had difficulty securing a new job because lack of citizenship. Additionally, when simply renewing the same license at age 34, the State refused to renew it multiple times because they weren’t trained how to vet my unchanged paperwork.

“If my status hadn’t changed and had been accepted previously, why was it no longer enough? These are just a few of the stress-riddled problems spanning years.

“I desire to remain active and productive in my community; regardless something beyond my control could happen and put me at risk for deportation. The fear I live with threatens my future. This gripping fear keeps me from registering to vote, applying for government jobs, getting married, adopting children, traveling abroad, and fulfilling the American Dream.”

The Problem

Adoptive parents were supposed to be responsible for completing the U.S. naturalization process for children they adopted from overseas. However, not all knew they had to. Many assumed the adoption agency did all of that, others said they forget.

The U.S. Child Citizenship Act (CCA) of 2000, signed by President Clinton, went into effect in 2001. CCA acknowledged the necessity for intercountry adopted children to receive citizenship and makes it possible for foreign-born children who are without U.S. citizenship at birth to gain citizenship through a U.S. citizen parent automatically, amending the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) to permit foreign-born children–including adopted children –to acquire citizenship automatically if they met certain requirements.

There is a major catch, however: It only applies to those adoptees who were less than 18 years old on, February 27, 2001. The amendment did not retroactively include adoption cases prior to the amendment, thus does not account for the peak of adoptees from South Korea – more than 160,000 of whom were adopted in the last 60 years, arriving in the U.S. in the 1970’s through the 1980’s.

Because the current law is not retroactive, thousands of adoptees, who were 18 years of age or older on February 27, 2001, are — through no fault of their own and negligence by the US federal and state governments, adoption agencies, or their adoptive parents — without automatic U.S. citizenship and essentially stateless.

Since then thousands of adoptees have been living in a state of limbo, unable to get driver’s licenses, vote, or work legally.

2016-06-29-1467168718-1762035-sSOUTHKOREAflagsmall.jpg

There are an estimated 18,000 Korean American adoptees alone without citizenship.

Adoptee Citizenship Act of 2015

In November 2015, Senator Amy Klobuchar (D-MN) and co-signers Senators Dan Coats (R-IN) and Jeff Merkley (D-OR) introduced the Adoptee Citizenship Act (ACA) of 2015, S.2275. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) and Brian Schatz (D-HI) are co-signers.

Representatives Trent Franks (R-AZ) and Adam Smith (D-WA) introduced House companion bill H.R. 5454 in June 2016, days before the second adoptee-led Adoptee Citizenship Act Day of Action.

The bills will grant retroactive U.S. citizenship to all internationally adopted individuals regardless of when they were adopted, addressing the issue that left thousands of adoptees who were born before 1982 unprotected by the Child Citizenship Act (CCA) of 2000. It will create a clear pathway for adoptees who have been deported to a country of birth where they have no known family, cannot speak the language, and do not know the culture — to return to the US.

It is time to fix this injustice inflicted on people without their knowledge, and who did nothing wrong. Let’s make adoption all it is supposed to be.

2016-06-29-1467168786-5375680-NAKASEC.jpg

For more information, please contact the Adoptee Rights Campaign (ARC) here.

2016-06-29-1467169627-3097393-KRC.jpg

National Korean American Service & Education Consortium nakasec.org
미주한인봉사교육단체협의회 (미교협)
VA office | 7006 Evergreen Court, Suite 200 Annandale, VA 22003 
LA office: [NEW Address] 900 S. Crenshaw Blvd. LA, CA 90019 Tel. 323-937-3703 / Fax 323-937-3753

2016-06-29-1467168981-3292889-KRCC.jpg

Full version of Senate bill is available here and the full version of House bill, here.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Solar-Energized Juno To Arrive At Jupiter On Independence Day

What NASA insisted for decades could not be — a spacecraft using solar energy rather than nuclear power going beyond the orbit of Mars — will be proven false on Monday, July 4th, Independence Day, when the solar-energized Juno space probe arrives at Jupiter.

NASA had maintained that to provide on-board power and heat on spacecraft in deep space, plutonium-powered systems were required — despite the disaster if there were an accident on launch or in a fall back to Earth and the plutonium was released. I broke the story 30 years ago about how the next mission of NASA’s ill-fated Challenger shuttle was to involve lofting a plutonium-powered space probe and I have been reporting in articles, books and on television on the nuclear-in-space issue ever since.

If the Challenger accident did not happen in January 1986 but the shuttle exploded on its next scheduled mission, in May 1986, with the plutonium-powered space probe in its cargo bay, the impacts could have been enormous. Plutonium is the most lethal of all radioactive substances.

Still, when NASA re-scheduled the two plutonium-powered missions it had planned for 1986 — one the Galileo mission to Jupiter — it not only publicly declared that plutonium systems to provide on-board power for space probes in deep space were necessary but swore to that in court.

Opponents of the Galileo mission brought suit in U.S. District Court in Washington, D.C. in 1989 seeking to stop the nuclear-energized Galileo shot because of its public health danger in the event of an accident, and they pressed NASA and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) on the availability of a safe energy alternative. NASA and DOE officials swore that only nuclear power would do that far out in space, that solar energy could not be harvested beyond the orbit of Mars.

And now comes NASA’s own Juno spacecraft energized by solar energy functioning in deep space. Indeed, NASA acknowledges, “This is the first time in history a spacecraft is using solar power so far out in space.”

Says Bruce Gagnon, coordinator of the Global Network Against Weapons and Nuclear Power in Space: “All during out campaigns to oppose NASA plutonium launches during 1989, 1990 and 1997” — when NASA launched its Cassini space probe with the most plutonium NASA ever used in a power system on a spacecraft — “the space agency maintained in court and in the media that solar would not work as an on-board power source in deep space. Then, in part because of grassroots pressure from around the planet, NASA decided to use solar on the deep space Juno mission.”

“To this day,” Gagnon went on last week, “NASA still maintains that it must use deadly nuclear devices on some of its space missions — further evidence that the nuclear industry maintains a stranglehold on the space agency. The nuclear industry mistakenly views space as a new market for its toxic product that so many have rejected back here on Earth.”

Gagnon added: “We will continue to organize to stop the nuclearization of space — and we will use NASA’s own Juno mission as evidence that the bad seed of nuclear power is not essential for space exploration.”

The Global Network — www.space4peace.org — established in 1992, is based in Maine.
Juno is not a minor space mission. As NASA states on its Juno mission web page-=”The primary scientific goal of the Juno mission is to significantly improve our understanding of the formation, evolution and structure of Jupiter. Concealed beneath a dense cover of clouds, Jupiter, the archetypical ‘Giant Planet,’ safeguards secrets to the fundamental processes underlying the early formation of our solar system. Present theories of the origin and early evolution of our solar system are currently at an impasse. Juno will provide answers to critical science questions about Jupiter, as well as key information that will dramatically enhance present theories about the early formation of our own solar system.”

Juno will, as of Monday, have flown nearly 2 billion miles to reach Jupiter. It was launched from Cape Canaveral, Florida on August 5, 2011. It did a “slingshot maneuver” or “flyby” of Earth in October 2013 to increase its velocity. It has been flying at 60,000 miles per hour. It will orbit Jupiter more than 30 times doing scientific observations.

And although sunlight at Jupiter is just four percent of what it is on Earth, Juno’s solar panels, manufactured by Spectrolab, a division of Boeing, will be able to continue to harvest solar energy. Its passes will include bringing it closer to Jupiter than any mission before.

On its current “Where is Juno?” page, NASA reports: “The Juno spacecraft is in excellent health and is operating nominally.”

The solar energy on 66-foot wide Juno is being generated by three large solar panels. They convert sunlight to electricity at a 28 percent efficiency rate. That’s a little over the 25 percent efficiency rate of the better photovoltaic rooftop panels now being widely used for electric power on Earth. The cost of the mission is $1.1 billion.

Says NASA on its website: “To answer our fundamental questions about origins we especially need to know Jupiter’s internal structure and global water abundance. Juno will map the internal structure by studying its influence on the planet’s gravitational field with unprecedented accuracy. The water abundance will be determined by microwave radiometers that will detect thermal radiation from deep atmospheric layers, a completely new approach. Water ice brought most of the heavy elements to Jupiter. Knowing the water abundance will tell us the original form of that ice and hence help define the conditions and processes in the original cloud of dust and gas that led to the origin of Jupiter. Those same conditions and processes were forming other planets too. Because this enormous planet contains most of the water in the solar system we can expect this investigation to help us understand the origin of the life-giving water on Earth.”

At the end of its mission NASA will send Juno diving into Jupiter and it will burn up.
“NASA going green with solar-powered Jupiter probe,” was the headline of an Associated Press article in USA Today in 2011. “NASA’s upcoming mission to Jupiter can’t get much greener than this: a solar-powered, windmill-shaped spacecraft,” the story began.

But it wasn’t as if solar on Juno was NASA’s first choice. The Associated Press piece described Scott Bolton, the principal investigator for the mission for the Southwest Research Institute, a NASA contractor, as maintaining “the choice of solar was a practical one… No plutonium-powered generators were available to him and his San Antonio-based team… so they opted for solar panels rather than develop a new nuclear source.” The article quoted Bolton as saying: “It’s nice to be green, but it wasn’t because we were afraid of plutonium.”

As bullish as NASA has been in using nuclear power on space probes, once it was as insistent in utilizing atomic energy to power space satellites, too. Then, in 1964, a satellite with a SNAP-9A plutonium system on board failed to achieve orbit and dropped to Earth, disintegrating as it fell, its plutonium fuel dispersing all over the Earth.

Long linking the SNAP-9A accident to an increase in lung cancer on Earth was the late Dr. John Gofman, an M.D. and Ph.D., discover of several radioactive isotopes who did extensive experiments with plutonium for the Manhattan Project, and was associate director of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and a professor at the University of California, Berkeley.

With the SNAP-9A accident, NASA switched to using solar energy on satellites. Now all satellites — and the International Space Station — are solar powered.

“A Juno success would be a good sign for future solar-powered missions of all types,” stated the Associated Press “NASA going green with solar-powered Jupiter probe” article.
Unfortunately, if NASA and the DOE have their way, rational energy decision-making won’t necessarily follow a Juno success. “The United States has begun manufacturing nuclear spacecraft fuel for the first time in a generation,” reported SpaceNews last month. SpaceNews said the Department of Energy is having its Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Los Alamos National Laboratory and Idaho National Laboratory join together to produce plutonium for NASA space missions. Some plutonium has been produced although “full production of the stuff is still seven years or so away,” it said.

In space as on Earth, solar power works.

But, says Gagnon, “Just like here on Earth there is a tug-of-war going on between those who wish to promote life-giving solar power and those who want nukes. That same battle for nuclear domination is being taken into the heavens by an industry that wants more profit — no matter the consequences. The Global Network will continue to organize around the space nuclear power issue by building a global constituency opposed to the risky and unnecessary nukes in space program.”

With solar-energized Juno’s arrival at Jupiter, this Independence Day should mark a blow for independence from dangerous nuclear power above our heads in space.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

From The Wrong Side Of The Tracks To Sin City's Top Criminal Defense Attorney

2016-06-29-1467194078-612760-MaceYampolskyMaceBuilding.jpg
Image source: PhotoDune

Mace Yampolsky grew up on the wrong side of the tracks just north of Boston in Revere, Massachusetts. As a young child, Mace watched many of his neighbors run into trouble with the law. We’ve all made mistakes before: running a red light, failing to come to a complete stop at a stop sign, forgetting to pay parking tickets. Some of us have even had a couple of beers and foolishly driven home. Many of us are lucky enough to pay a fee or take a driver’s education course and move on. But for Mace’s neighbors, small mistakes led to even bigger legal problems.

“Many of the people I grew up with weren’t able to help themselves,” says Mace. “People accused of a crime often don’t know what to do and say things that end up hurting themselves. I wanted to help.”

Worse, Mace says he watched how insurance companies took advantage of people injured through no fault of their own. The insurance companies would push people to settle cases for far less than they were owed. Lacking legal guidance, people settled- even though they were still injured, in pain, and unable to live a full, active life. Mace decided to do something about it.

Mace’s passion for helping others drove him to study law. Today, he’s one of Las Vegas’ top defense attorneys, and his firm Mace Yampolsky & Associates has successfully defended hundreds of clients. Over the years, Mace has earned a reputation as one of Las Vegas’ most outspoken, memorable and effective criminal defense attorneys.

Recently, I sat down with Mace to learn more about his journey to becoming an attorney. As a digital marketer, naturally I had to ask a few questions about how digital marketing is transforming the legal profession, giving individuals in legal trouble immediate access to legal assistance. From his flamboyant personality to his passionate commitment to helping each and every client, Mace is nothing like what you’d expect from a defense attorney. Here are his fascinating insights:

What drives your passion for the legal profession?

I’ve represented lots of people for all kinds of legal issues. From my experience, I noticed that many individuals were being charged with DUI, these people are not “REAL” criminals. They are just people that for the most part made a mistake and had a couple of drinks. It seemed to me like many people would “just plead Guilty” to get it over with unfortunately they didn’t realize that there were severe consequences that they just didn’t consider: loss of license, an increase in insurance, adverse presumptions in custody cases and potential deportation. As I learned growing up, people accused of a crime often don’t know what to do and end up hurting themselves and getting trapped in the system. I became a lawyer to help people navigate this system to a better life.

Between smartphones and Google, people have immediate access to legal knowledge. This is an entirely different structure than existed even a decade ago. How have you adapted to digital trends?

You’re absolutely right; it’s easy to Google your way to just about any legal answer these days! But like WebMD, there’s often a lack of experience or necessary background knowledge to really make sense of online legal advice. That’s one reason why our website started offering a 24/7 messaging service. We also have live operators that answer the phone 24/7. I am always available for emergencies. Sometimes when clients were about to be arrested, I’ve been able to convince the police to let me appear in court with the customer instead of arresting my client.

Once I was called right after a client suffered a severe accident. I was able to contact his family and make sure that he received proper treatment from the beginning, then met them all at the hospital. This reduced their stress level. I’ve often met clients at the hospital. This makes the customers less nervous and allows me to make sure they are treated properly in the ER. We live in a 24/7 world, and whether it’s through my firm’s website or phone, I believe in always being available to help.

You’ve received some fantastic online reviews on multiple platforms. How important are do you feel these online reviews are when people select a lawyer? How have these positive reviews impacted your business?

I think these reviews are incredibly important. What I say about myself is one thing. What others say is infinitely more important. If potential clients see that I’ve handled cases like theirs, it makes them feel more comfortable. When potential customers see the terrific online reviews, it significantly reduces their anxiety and stress level. It makes them more likely to hire us.

What’s the biggest piece of advice you would give a new law firm that’s building its first website?

There’s an old joke that “half of my marketing is working, but I just don’t know which half.” In today’s highly competitive marketplace, there’s no room for guessing games.

Figure out exactly what kind of cases you want and what your ideal client looks like. Then write content for your website on a regular basis that attracts these ideal clients. Don’t forget to promote your content! Getting your content seen by the right people is more than half the battle. Make sure you can track where your leads come from.

Looking back, what is the one thing you wish you had known before you got started with your practice?

I wish I knew I was going to have a thriving practice and do only the types of cases I like: DUI, criminal and personal injury. Lawyers that specialize can help clients more effectively. I handled divorce cases for about 15 years, and I hated them! Now, I’m much happier with my current focus.

You are well known for being such a “character” around Las Vegas; how has this positively impacted your business?

I have an ebullient and flamboyant personality. I’m not like every other lawyer. I make people laugh. I play the piano and harmonica. I’ve performed with many bands around town. The same qualities that make me entertaining also make me a great trial lawyer. My juries never fall asleep, and they never forget me!

Bottom line:

From our interview, it was clear that Mace Yampolsky is a different kind of lawyer. He’s genuinely passionate about helping people navigate the legal system and protecting their rights. He’s also digitally savvy: he understands that digital marketing success is predicated on more than just a website that ranks in Google search results. From online reviews to 24/7 access, Mace is redefining what it means to be a modern criminal defense attorney. And it doesn’t hurt that he’s an excellent piano and harmonica player, either!

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Turkish Police Raid ISIS Safe Houses, Detain 22 Islamic State Suspects As Death Toll Climbs

ISTANBUL — Turkish police have detained 22 Islamic State suspects in the wake of Tuesday’s triple suicide bombing at Istanbul Ataturk Airport, according to a Turkish official. 

Police carried out raids on supposed ISIS safe houses in Istanbul and the western coastal city of Izmir, detaining both Turkish citizens and foreign nationals. It remains unclear whether any of the detainees have direct links to the bloody airport attack.

The death toll rose to 43 on Thursday, 19 of whom were foreign nationals from country’s including: Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Tunisia, Uzbekistan, China, Iraq, Ukraine and Jordan.

Ninety-four out of 238 wounded men and women still remain in the hospital, recovering from the attack that included firearms and bombs.

The three men who detonated bombs at the bustling airport’s international terminal hailed from Russia, Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan, a Turkish official said Thursday.

Identification of the attackers’ bodies has been difficult due to extensive soft tissue damage caused in the explosions, but a medical team has been working around the clock to get answers.

The three attackers arrived late Tuesday night in a taxi, just like the three bombers who killed 32 people at Brussels Airport and nearby metro station in March.

Prime Minister Binali Yildirim has blamed ISIS for the deadly attack, though the group has not claimed responsibility as they have in other bombings.

For years, Turkey’s border with Syria was dubbed the “jihadi highway,” with desperate refugees and hardline militants crossing with relative ease.

Critics slammed the government’s perceived lack of response, warning that Turkey was providing ISIS fighters with a safe harbor, and easy access to supplies and war-torn Syria.

But as Turkey upped the ante by sealing the border and conducting raids on safe houses across the country, ISIS began to lash out.

Turkish and U.S. officials agree the massacre was likely the work of the extremist group, which has repeatedly targeted Turkey with suicide bombs, firearms and Katyusha rockets lobbed across the border. Previous attacks on Turkish soil have been claimed by or blamed on Kurdish militant groups, who normally target police and security forces.

Many Turks, whose country’s once thriving tourism sector has been left in shambles, now wonder if this type of violence is fast becoming the new normal. The airport carnage has been met with fear and fury, but also profound acts of kindness.

Many of the men, women and children killed by ISIS, which preaches a militant, warped version of Islam slammed by religious leaders around the world, have been Muslim themselves.

“May Allah bless the souls of everyone who lost their lives in this heinous attack,” Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan said on Wednesday.

“The attack, which took place during the holy month of Ramadan, shows that terrorism strikes with no regard for faith and values. Nor do terrorists distinguish between their victims,” he said.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.