3 Mistakes You're Making On LinkedIn (And How To Fix Them)

By: Annette Richmond

2016-06-17-1466182548-5744248-23505226972_e99c27f656_z.jpg
Image Source: ThinkStock

Today, having a robust, optimized LinkedIn profile is as essential as having a resume. If your resume garners the interest of a recruiter or hiring manager, the first thing they are likely to do is review your LinkedIn profile to learn more about you.

For better or worse, what they find on your LinkedIn profile will influence their perception.

In other cases, for example if your LinkedIn profile comes up in a recruiter’s search, your profile is the first time a recruiter will meet you. If they don’t find anything compelling on your LinkedIn profile, they will probably move on to the next potential candidate.

Many of the mistakes people make with their LinkedIn profile are easy to fix. Here are solutions to 3 common missteps.

Using Your Default Headline

Your LinkedIn headline is one of the most valuable sections of your profile. It’s one of the first things people see when they view your profile. It’s also one of the first things people, oftentimes recruiters, see when your profile comes up in a search.

Unless you specifically change your headline, LinkedIn will default to your current job position. While this may not hurt you, why not make it do better?

Switch out your default headline to something that will serve you better. Maybe your job title (or target job title) and a few of your skills. For example: Director Human Resources | Recruiting | Onboarding | Leadership Development.

[Watch: ​Leveraging LinkedIn for Networking and Business Success]

Having A Skeleton Profile

Another common mistake is having an incomplete or “skeleton” profile. When told that they need to be on LinkedIn, many people set up an account and fill in just the “basics” like their name, job titles, and maybe their education. This is bad for a few reasons.

First, the more robust your LinkedIn profile the better chance you have of being seen by recruiters. Second, if a recruiter does manage to stumble across your “barely there” profile there will be nothing to inspire her to contact you.

So spend a little time completing your LinkedIn profile. Fill in your job descriptions. Talk about your accomplishments. Use your Summary to add some personality. Let people know who you are.

No Contact Information

Unless you don’t want anyone to contact you make sure you include your email address on your LinkedIn profile. Don’t assume that recruiters will use an InMail. Recruiters are allocated a certain number of InMails each month depending on their membership level. If you fall into a recruiter’s “maybe” pile he may not want to use an InMail.

In any case, if you’re looking for a new opportunity, or are even open to one, you want to make it as easy as possible for people to contact you. At the very least, add the Advice for Contacting section to your profile and include your contact information.

If you’re not conducting a confidential job search include your email address in your Summary as well. If you’re concerned about sharing your personal email address set up a new one just for your job search.

Today, your LinkedIn profile is a must have in your job search tool box. A robust, optimized LinkedIn profile can help you be found by recruiters trying to fill open positions. It can help you sell yourself to a potential employer who has received your resume.

Remember, your resume and LinkedIn profile should complement each other. Both should showcase your talents and achievements. However, your LinkedIn profile is where you have the opportunity to show more personality. Make the most of it.

[Related: ​The 3 Secrets to Achieve More Through LinkedIn]

Annette Richmond is a Certified Resume Writer, Certified LinkedIn Profile Writer, and owner of career intelligence Resume Writing & Career Services. She has been featured on Monster, Forbes, and Business Insider. Her work appears in Resumes For Dummies.

Ellevate Network is a global women’s network: the essential resource for professional women who create, inspire and lead. Together, we #InvestInWomen.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

A Brazilian Artist's 'Self-Portraits' Explore The Beauty Of Interracial Identity

In 1976, a Brazilian census asked citizens of the country — for the very first time — to describe and identify their own skin color.

This was a significant moment for the former European colony, now considered one of the most ethnically diverse nations in the world, that’s historically struggled with discriminatory policies that disproportionately affect African descendants and interracial people. Though it may have been used for more nefarious purposes at the time, the census was a small step in affirming the many identities that exist in Brazil, wedged in the massive gap between black and white.

The survey produced over 130 different skin color descriptions, ranging from “Morena-roxa” (purplish-tan) to “Café-com-leite” (milky coffee) to “Queimada-de-sol” (sun-kissed). Fast forward a few decades, and Brazilian artist Adriana Varejão became transfixed with the multitude of colors expressed in the census, interested in the ways it illustrated — in sensual detail — the beauty of mestizaje, or the mixing of ancestries, in her home.

So in 2014, Varejão, who lives and works in Rio de Janeiro, created “Polvo,” a series of self-portraits that explore the diversity of identity in Brazil using a paint palette inspired by the 1976 census. First, she mixed oil paints herself, reproducing colors like “Amarela-quemada” (burnt yellow or ochre) and “Paraíba” (like the color of marupa wood) as pigments. Then, she painted her own image, over and over, in a variety of browns, pinks, blacks and whites; a reflection of the many ways Brazilian self-definition takes form.

Varejão’s career, before “Polvo” and after, has been dedicated to the concept of mestizaje, and how art can help “cannibalize” — rather than outright reject — the lingering cultural ideas that took hold during colonialism (not so subtly motivated by the writings of poet Oswald de Andrade). Varejão’s latest series, “Kindred Spirits,” is a similar effort, consisting of 29 portraits of the artist donning the markings and body ornamentation of Native American tribes.

Varejão based this work partially on the portraiture of older artists like George Catlin, Charles Bird King, Henry Inman and Edwards Curtis, who photographed, painted or copied portraits of Native American individuals. The work is also informed by more modern and contemporary artists like Sol LeWitt, Agnes Martin, Paul Thek and Llyn Foulkes, represented in the nods to minimalist habits that can be found in “Kindred Spirits.”

The name of the series is taken from a 2012 book, also titled Kindred Spirits, which describes the connections between Native American visuals and the work of largely white artists, particularly, as Varejão’s gallery Lehmann Maupin points out, how Native American approaches to line and color influenced 20th-century Western art.

The varied portraits highlight the ways in which the exchange of ideas — in all directions — has shaped the ways we process ourselves. In Varejão’s paintings, the indigenous markings seem to hint at techniques of modern art, mimicking the ways indigenous and European culture push and pull each other in South America. But the series is also purposefully critical of the idea that Brazil is a peaceful melting pot of cultural ideas. “There is this propaganda that we are this racial democracy. And in fact I don’t think we are,” she told The Wall Street Journal in 2014.

Varejão, when asked how she views herself racially, explained to Hyperallergic that she is as Portuguese as she is Indian as she is black. “I believe in building a mestizo identity, which means to have everything together with balance,” she added. “When people come to Brazil, they forget their ancestral identity.” 

To complicate the mixing of artistic and cultural influences even more, the paintings in “Kindred Spirits” are not your typical self-portraits. They were originally made by Chinese fabricators, based on photographs of herself Varejão sent. The Chinese reproductions were then altered by Varejão, to include the piercings, face paint, headdresses and other adornments characteristic of indigenous tribes in the American Plains and Southwest. She also added the flourishes of LeWitt and Foulkes, apparent in the bits of rigid geometry and distilled color.

Like “Polvo,” the portraits of “Kindred Spirits” are not meant to represent reality, but to underscore how convoluted our perception of identity can become. By diving deep into the issues related to miscegenation — the mixing of different racial groups through marriage and parenthood — in Brazil, she offers up a complex retelling of colonialism’s effect on personhood, the lasting effects of assimilation, and the darker spirit of coexistence.

As one of the most famous living artists in the country, who’s shown her work at places like the Guggenheim Museum in New York, the Hara Museum of Contemporary Art in Tokyo and the Victoria Miro Gallery in London, Varejão isn’t afraid to create provocative art that challenges what interracial identity means today.

Adriana Varejão’s “Kindred Spirits” is on view until June 19, 2016, at Lehmann Maupin’s location at 201 Chrystie Street in New York City. Also on view is Varejão’s “Mimbres” series, a collection of crackled works inspired by 11th century Mimbres pottery from what is now the southwestern United States.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

A Father's Day Lesson and Baseball

When I was my son’s current age, my dad took me to my first baseball game ever. It was a minor league baseball game, where the El Paso Diablos played the San Antonio Dodgers. Though I enjoyed the experience, I wondered what it all meant. I think I get it now.

Was it a message to be a great baseball player? After the game, I put on my Rod Carew glove, go out and threw tennis balls at the wall until my arm fell off, snagging grounders on the rebound. I even fashioned a strike zone from some well-placed stones. But I never became a big league pitcher.

Dad did teach me to hit. I was a natural righty, and he was a natural lefty, so he taught me how to bat left-handed. Being a switch-hitter in college was great…for co-ed intramural softball, where guys had to bat with their opposite hand. I was just about the only guy who could get an extra-base hit, much less hit the ball. But intramurals was the height of my baseball career.

Maybe it was about being a great manager. As soon as my son was old enough, I became his coach. Our Bad News Bears team of all the wait-listed kids actually managed to have a winning season. I certainly had a lot of enthusiasm, but I think I had the advantage of pitching to Zach for years (he hated tee-ball and preferred hitting a thrown ball), over more talented dads, who were unfortunately better at getting strikeouts than inducing from easily-to-hit pitches. But I didn’t have enough skills beyond that, and was glad to be a first-base coach or third-base coach, relying upon the smarts and talent of other coaches.

Could it be about being a great statistician? After all, dad taught me how to keep score at that first game. And if it wasn’t for sports, I probably would never have passed math. Learning how to calculate batting averages and earned run averages whetted my appetite for regression analyses and non-parametric statistics, with politics as the subject, instead of sports. But I still don’t think that was the lesson.

Might it have been about being a great sportswriter? I melded my dad’s enthusiasm for athletics with my mom’s ability and passion for writing. My first job was to write for the sports section of the El Paso Herald-Post, while in high school. Though both parents were pleased, I am not sure that’s what the real point was of getting me interested in baseball.

As I took Zach to yet another baseball game in Atlanta, where we watched Freddie Freeman hit for the cycle, I taught him to keep score, and listened to him recite facts from the program (like pitcher Jim Johnson happens to be from Johnson City, Tennessee), it hit me what dad was trying to do at that first baseball game. He was trying to show me how to be a great dad.

After all, isn’t that the point of so many great baseball movies? Kevin Costner’s Ray Kinsella gets to play catch with his dad in an Iowa Cornfield in “Field of Dreams.” Roy Hobbs, played by Robert Redford, ends the film “The Natural” tossing a ball with his son, the ball-boy as Iris looks on. Father and son reconcile at the end of the 2002 film “The Rookie,” starring Dennis Quaid about one of the oldest rookies in history. And what major league ballpark isn’t having a Father’s Day special?

There’s something special about baseball and Father’s Day that goes beyond the sport itself. It’s about showing the best gift is about spending time with one another.

John A. Tures is a professor of political science at LaGrange College in LaGrange, Ga. He can be reached at jtures@lagrange.edu.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

What We've Failed To Learn About Mass Shootings Fueled By Hate

June 17 marks the one-year anniversary of one of the worst mass shootings in America — the Charleston church massacre. On that day, 21-year-old Dylann Roof sat with a bible study group at the historic Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church. After a full hour of sitting with the group as they worshipped, he proceeded to pull out a gun and open fire on them, killing nine innocent people — all of them African American. 

Later, we would find out in a manifesto published on Roof’s website that the intention behind his heinous act was fueled by a deep hatred for black people. He expressed disgust at the thought of black men and white women together, claiming, “you [black men] rape our women.” His desire was to spark a race war.

A year after the massacre, a year after heated debates on gun control and mental health and most of all race, we’ve now been plunged into yet another national conversation that rests at the intersection of horrific violence and hatred: the shooting in Orlando.

But what have we actually learned? 

That’s always the question when it comes to the cancer of gun violence and mass shootings that plague this country (and this world). What have we learned? How do we progress? How do we ensure that something like this never happens again? The answer, surely, lies in our policies surrounding guns, policies that currently in many states make it terrifyingly easy for citizens to legally purchase assault rifles. But the answer also lies in something we’re seemingly unwilling to do in the United States: acknowledge, recognize and work through our national demons.

The Charleston massacre was significant for a lot of reasons. It was just days before Juneteenth (the annual celebration of the end of slavery in the Americas), at a church that played an integral role in the Civil Rights movement. It also happened during what seemed like a racial boiling point in America.

In April, Walter Scott, unarmed, was shot and killed from behind in South Carolina while fleeing from a police officer — the circumstances of his death only came to light when a video taken by a bystander eventually surfaced. In May, the state of emergency had been lifted in Baltimore, where protests surrounding the death of Freddie Gray had filled the streets. Police brutality and the #BlackLivesMatter movement were both at the forefront of the country’s collective mind.

With all this tension around race in the atmosphere, what happened in Charleston was as much about the senseless destruction caused by gun violence as it was about the senseless destruction caused by racism. Roof was a radical manifestation of our race problem, a potent reminder that white supremacy and white rage are not anomalies — they’re worked into the very fabric of this country. The more we ignore them, the more we allow them to grow, just beneath the surface.

The homophobia of Omar Mateen, the shooter behind the terrorism at Pulse nightclub in Orlando, is also just beneath the surface in this country. There’s been a lot of debate about whether Mateen’s attack was fueled by “radical Islam” or homophobia, but whatever his alliances, it is clear Mateen sought out LGBT victims to kill in an LGBT space. 

And his disgust also festers in this country, a country where one week a person can say that trans people should “go pee in the bushes” instead of public restrooms, and weeks later share their condolences to the LGBT people affected by the shooting. Therein lies the blinding hypocrisy of our horror at these violent incidents.

And let us not forget when 22-year-old Elliot Rodger killed six people in Isla Vista, California, back in May 2014. He, too, exposed a sense of entitlement and hatred for women that’s very much a part of our society. The display of his hatred may have been extreme, but the hatred itself was not exclusive to him. He chose a mass shooting to express his anger at rejection, at women not freely allowing him access to their bodies. It’s a type of anger that’s expressed through physical and sexual violence against women every day. 

And that’s the thing. These shootings are reminders of the reality of these isms (homophobia, racism, sexism) in our everyday lives. The Charleston shooting laid bare a reality of this country in a brutal, raw way. But the deaths of Freddie Gray, Mike Brown, Trayvon Martin, Sandra Bland, the deaths of the nine innocent people at Mother Emmanuel Church, the violent and senseless deaths of countless black people across this country and across the centuries all lie on a continuum. They are not separate. They are echoes of each other. 

Charleston, Isla Vista, Orlando. As tempting as it is to dismiss these mass shooters as maniacs (and of course, in a sense, they are), we have to recognize that they hold ideals that many Americans, behind closed doors, share. Of course, not every mass shooting in America has been fueled by an ism. But what we can learn from the common thread that link these specific incidents is that violence manifests itself in many ways. It can be explicit or it can be subtle, but all violence makes an impact, and leaves a scar.

One year after Charleston and days after Orlando, here’s what we need to learn: these mass shootings are the extreme demonstrations of hate, yes. But every time someone turns away in disgust at a gay couple kissing, misgenders a trans person, harasses a woman on the street, or questions the concept of “black lives matter,” it’s a subtle violence, a contribution to the kind of hate that explodes across the 24-hour news cycle in the form of another mass shooting. It’s time we accept that, so we can truly move forward. 

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Hey Guys, Wearing An Erection On Your Back Just Got Fashionable (NSFW)

This fashion boner was no accident.

Raf Simons is the latest designer to go phallic, creating a coat with a Robert Mapplethorpe photo of an erect penis on the back, Esquire reports.

The jacket made its debut Thursday during Simons’ spring 2017 show at the Pitti Uomo menswear event in Florence, Italy, according to Complex.

It looks all innocent from the front … 

… but from the back, not so much.

Not to diss Mapplethorpe’s artistic cachet, we’re trying to figure out the right occasion for this — ballgame? school? job interview? — and coming up a tad short.

Peen has made the scene on other runways recently. Earlier this year, Vivienne Westwood adorned her models with silver and gold penis necklaces. And in early 2015, Rick Owens sent models down the runway in junk-exposing cloaks. 

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

We Might Finally Solve the ‘Alien Megastructure’ Mystery

Good news alien hunters! A Kickstarter to fund a year-long investigation into KIC 8462852—the star voted most likely to harbor an advanced alien civilization—just got funded. Alien megastructure or not, we may finally get to the bottom of this bewildering, flickering star.

Read more…

Jacob Appelbaum Banned From Prominent Hacker Conference Following Sexual Assault Allegations

Jacob Appelbaum has been banned from Chaos Computer Club events following numerous allegations that he sexually assaulted women and acted inappropriately at hacker events. Appelbaum regularly spoke at CCC events like Chaos Communication Congress and Chaos Communication Camp.

Read more…

A Guide to Apple's Radically Reimagined Messages App

At WWDC, Apple showed of a crazy new version of Messages. Feeling pressure from other messaging services like Facebook Messenger, Snapchat, and Google’s new Allo, Apple has completely reimagined its app for the youths. In just the few days we’ve spent with iOS 10’s developer preview, we’ve found more than a dozen new features just within Messages alone. It’s likely more are coming.

Read more…

Snapchat announces once-daily digital magazine about technology

Snapchat announces once-daily digital magazine about technologyWe all know that Snapchat’s meat and potatoes are selfies and videos, but that doesn’t mean the company isn’t interested in exploring new ideas. Snapchat made a solid attempt at creating original video content, but after that was shut down last fall, its ready to try something different. It’s not video-related this time; instead, it’s text — no, not text … Continue reading

OnePlus 3 Review Part 4: Answering your Questions (Q&A)

oneplus3This week we’ve been answering your questions on social media about the OnePlus 3 in our extended review series. Today we’re publishing a number of questions – especially the ones that’ve come up more than once – in an effort to make our answers more easily accessibly for everyone. This is part 4 of our ongoing review series with the … Continue reading