These Guys Doing Crazy Tricks on a Pole Must Have Magnetic Superpowers

These Guys Doing Crazy Tricks on a Pole Must Have Magnetic Superpowers

Forgive me, but I think it’s plausible that these two guys are actually the first mutants in the world, because the way they move so easily around this Chinese pole makes it seem like they have magnetic superpowers or access to an invisible wall. They can flip, slide, stop, walk on nothing, and do things I can’t even do on solid ground, all while mid-air on the pole. I can’t imagine that they’re just human like me and are just simply stronger from lots of practice and hard work. That can’t be.

Read more…

When It Comes to Vocal Range, It's Not Just Size That Matters

Most people have a modest two-octave vocal range when they sing, but some rare talents can manage five octaves or more. Think the late great, Freddie Mercury of Queen, or Guns N’ Roses’ Axl Rose, although composer-singer Tim Storms holds the Guinness World Record for the largest vocal range: a whopping 10 octaves.

Read more…

Opera adds native ad blocker on iOS, Android and Windows Phone

Opera has announced a controversial new feature for its browsers on iOS, Android and Windows Phone: native ad blocking. Those who choose to enable it will have the browser block advertisements for them, something that feels beneficial on the user end but ultimately harms the websites those users visit. Opera says the new native ad blocking feature will help speed … Continue reading

Olli self-driving bus uses IBM Watson, is live in Washington DC

Local Motors has taken the wraps off a new self-driving bus named Olli. The bus is said to be the first autonomous one of its kind to use IBM’s Watson technology, and it is currently on the road in Washington D.C. Local Motors introduced the bus this morning at the Grand Opening of its new facility in National Harbor, Maryland; … Continue reading

Keep your sheet music organized with Gvido E Ink reader

Sheet music can be difficult to corral if you don’t have some sort of system. Take it from a high school saxophone player with a chronic case of disorganization. That’s where the gorgeous E Ink device known as the Gvido comes in.

The Corruption Olympics

I do plainly and ingenuously confess that I am guilty of corruption. . . .
Francis Bacon
, On being charged by Parliament with corruption in office.

Brazil to the rescue! I am not referring to the Olympics which will, if successful, serve as a distraction from other world events that are singularly depressing. Brazil is riding to the rescue by reminding us that as corrupt as some leaders in our political system may be, Brazil beats us hands down. For being made aware of the difference, we are indebted to the year 2016 and three separate but equal, at least in some respects, events. The events described are not exclusive but merely representative. The first, and most recent, is brought to us by an old favorite, Wayne G. Hubbard of Alabama.

On June 9, 2016, Mr. Hubbard was the Speaker of the Alabama House of Representatives. He attained that post when, in 2010, the Republicans took control of the Alabama House for the first time since Reconstruction. Following that triumph, Mr. Hubbard wrote a book entitled “Storming the Statehouse” in which he explained the Republican victory. That happened, he said, because: “Ethics was a subject that set Republicans apart from the Democrats.” The “setting apart” to which he was referring came about because prior to the election there had been a number of indictments and scandals involving Democrats. There had not, apparently, been similar events involving Republicans. Mr. Hubbard would eventually correct that. On June 10, 2016, Mr. Hubbard’s tenure as Speaker of the Alabama House of Representatives came to an end. That was because on that day he was convicted of 12 felony ethics charges, a conviction that automatically caused his tenure as Speaker to come to an end. Instead of serving as Speaker of the House, he faces the possibility that he will serve up to 20 years in prison on each of the 12 criminal counts of which he was convicted. There is a bit of poetic justice in all this. The law that led to Mr. Hubbard’s conviction was passed by the Republicans when they took control of the House in 2010.

Mr. Hubbard is not the only state legislator who will look back on May 2016 as a particularly bad month. In New York State, Dean Skelos and Sheldon Silver both former New York legislators, found that to be a particularly bad month. Dean Skelos was the Republican majority leader of the New York State Senate. In December 2015 he was convicted of Federal corruption charges and on May 12, 2015, he was sentenced to five years in prison. He is no longer the Republican majority leader of the New York State Senate. Sheldon Silver was the Democratic Speaker of the New York State Assembly, and was convicted of, among other things, money laundering and extortion. Like Mr. Hubbard, the conviction cost him his seat in the Assembly. On May 3, 2016, Mr. Silver was sentenced to 12 years in prison. The good news to emerge from those examples is that there are good people available to replace the two former leaders who are not corrupt. For that, our friends in Brazil may well be envious.

On April 17, 2016, the Brazilian lower house of the Brazilian Congress overwhelmingly voted to impeach the president of the country, Dilma Rousseff. The impeachment proceedings were led by the President of the House, Eduardo Cunha. As he cast his vote in favor of impeaching President Rousseff, Mr. Cunha said: “God have pity on this nation.” God fell down on the job as far as Mr. Cunha was concerned. In early May, Mr. Cunha was ordered to step down from his post because he is charged with, among other things, having taken $40 million in bribes.

Following her impeachment, Ms. Roussseff stepped aside as president and was replaced by Michel Timer. On June 15, 2016, Brazil’s Supreme Court released testimony from a plea bargain that implicated Mr. Timer in a graft scandal that involved, among others, Petrobras, Brazil’s state oil company.

The lower house of the parliament has 513 deputies of which 367 voted for impeachment. According to a watchdog group in Brasilia, Congresso em Foco, more than 300 of the members of the lower house are under investigation for such things as corruption, fraud, or electoral crimes.

Mr. Cunha has been replaced as President of the lower house of Congress by Waldir Maranhão. Mr. Maranhão is also involved in the graft scheme pertaining to Petrobras. The president of the senate is Renan Calheiros. Tax evasion and receiving bribes are among the matters for which he is being investigated.

Brazil’s troubles help the United States in that it shows how things could be worse in Alabama and New York. There could be no one to replace the corrupt politicians who are heading off to jail. There is, of course, something positive that Brazil can look forward to. It can look forward to hosting the Olympics in August assuming construction of the needed facilities is completed and there is not too much adverse publicity from the polluted water in which some of the events will take place. Its political problems will not spoil the games for those in attendance-only for those who are citizens of that country. Christopher Brauchli can be emailed at brauchli.56@post.harvard.edu. For political commentary see his web page at http://humanraceandothersports.com

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Do All Kids Like To Be Competitive? Nope

So in my last blog I did my best to try to tell you that, by nature, kids like to “play.” This time, it’s why some kids like to “compete.”

What’s the difference, you say?

I’ll start by telling you one of the many stories in my youth sports diary. Maybe this will help some of you understand the difference.

I received a call one day from a father asking my advice about his 6-year-old son playing T-ball.

Here’s how the conversation went:

“Fred, every time I pick my son up from baseball practice, the coach pulls me aside and says, ‘I just want you to know that the whole time he is here he is crying, saying that he hates baseball and wants to go home.’ So do you think I should make him stay and tough it out?”

To which I replied, “You have to be kidding me. You are asking me whether you should abuse the kid? Obviously, it’s not that he doesn’t like baseball, he hates it. Get him out of the league and give him a list of the following to choose from: sports, drama, art and music and you’ll see that sports, and especially competitive sports, are not his things.”

Now I’m writing this blog because I know a lot of you are saying that you think the father should have made him stay. I can hear it now: “That’s what’s wrong with our society today. We’re turning kids into a bunch of quitters and wimps.”

And to those of you who are saying it, let me ask you. Would you keep your kid in piano lessons if the teacher said he hates playing the piano? Or how about if you enrolled him in an art class?

In sports, I suspect that 90 percent of the kids who play T-ball didn’t rush to their parents and say, “please sign me up.” Most parents just sign their kids up, while saying to themselves, “Isn’t it what every other parent does for their kids?”

I’m not saying that it’s a bad thing to sign your kids up for sports. But the thing to keep foremost in your mind is since this is a competitive activity, does my kid “like” competition? The bottom line is that while all kids want to play (and I don’t mean just sports), not all kids want to compete. To many, competition is not fun. And if it’s not fun, then why make them do it?

Competition in children’s sports is having a contest between one team or another and with competition comes rules, regulations, scoreboards, standings and championships. It can either be awesome or ugly, and therein lies the problem in sports for children; particularly those below the age of 10. When adults lose sight of the fact that competition for children must first and foremost be enjoyable, challenging and fun, then organized sports for children loses all its value. In today’s world, we see children’s sports mirroring games at the professional level. Why?

Several years ago I met Gary Warner. Gary had written a book called “Competition” and nowhere have I read a more in-depth description of the topic. Here are some of the most compelling things he had to say:

(1) We are competing, not playing, when we must make sacrifices and commitments.

(2) When we worry about defeat rather than fun, and when pressure and stress take over, then we cease to play.

(3) It’s perfectly all right to choose either play or competition as long as you know what you’re choosing.

(4) People who don’t care about records choose to play. Those who chase records choose competition.

(5) Winning the competition is the ultimate emotional release for the participant. It’s an incredible feeling. It strikes the ego; fills one with pride.

Throughout my career, as the founder of the National Alliance for Youth Sports, I’ve had numerous people write and call me about my stance against competition for children. Nothing could be further from the truth.

As a former high school wrestler, I learned through competition how to persevere when things were down.

I believe that competition, when played by the rules, instills young people with the values of fair play, sportsmanship and ethics. Competition can build character traits in young people that will last a lifetime. These are the qualities we admire in people we live with, work with and play with throughout our lives.

Individuals with a competitive spirit are usually the leaders in every aspect of our society. So competition can be a positive thing. But only if we demand it be free of cheating, violence and all the ugly occurrences we have seen for far too long.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

What America's Next President Is Really Getting Into

This was originally published in Fortune.

The board room and the Oval Office are more alike than you think.

Corporate takeovers are high-wire acts requiring detailed preparation, an understanding of company cultures and organization, first-rate leaders and a mandate to create added value for stakeholders. Even in the best of circumstances, mergers and acquisitions frequently fail or fall short of expectations.

The same dynamics apply to the transfer of power from one presidential administration to the next – the largest, most complex and consequential takeover of any organization on the planet that will formally take place when a new U.S. president is sworn in on Jan. 20, 2017.

Just think about it. A candidate campaigns day and night for the presidency for more than a year, wins the big prize, and two and a half months later walks into the Oval Office as the CEO of a government that spends almost $4 trillion a year and has a workforce of 2.1 million civilian employees and more than 2 million active-duty military and reserve members. Now that is a test for even the most fearless or experienced leader.

Click here to read more.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Support For Gun Control Spikes After Orlando Shooting

Support for stricter gun laws is up sharply after America’s most deadly mass shooting to date, a new HuffPost/YouGov survey finds.

Americans are more concerned about gun violence and more optimistic that such shootings can be stopped than they were in a poll taken just days before the attacks.

A 55 percent majority of respondents now say they support stricter guns laws, up 7 points since earlier this month. The share of Americans who believe that gun violence is a very serious problem rose by a similar margin, while the percentage who think that passing gun control is possible and that shootings are preventable saw smaller upticks.

Specific gun control policies are even more popular. Eighty-six percent of Americans polled support closing the so-called terror gap by passing a law preventing individuals on the terror watch list from purchasing firearms. Sixty-two percent back a ban on the sale of assault rifles.

Most Americans are classifying the shooting as both an act of terrorism and a hate crime — 65 percent of respondents following news about the Orlando shooting say they have done so, as has the FBI. Thirteen percent say the attack was a hate crime but not an act of terrorism, 6 percent that it was terrorism but not a hate crime, and the rest are unsure.

Meanwhile, the country remains divided on presumptive GOP nominee Donald Trump’s call to bar Muslims from the United States, with 44 percent in favor and 41 percent opposed. But there has always been wide variation across surveys on the issue: A new NBC/SurveyMonkey poll found slightly higher support for such a ban, while a CBS News poll conducted over the same time period found a majority opposed.

More generally, Americans aren’t convinced by Trump’s attempt to paint a shooting carried out by a U.S.-born citizen as a consequence of lax immigration laws. Just 28 percent of respondents who followed news about the shooting say tougher immigration laws would have prevented the attack, while 44 percent say that stricter gun control would have made a difference.

Guns have risen in prominence as an election issue. Fifty-two percent of registered voters polled say that gun control will be very important in their vote for president this year, up 10 points from the previous survey.

That change comes largely from Democratic voters. Prior to the shooting, Republicans and Democrats were equally likely to rate gun issues as a very important election issue, at 45 percent and 44 percent, respectively. In the post-shooting survey, however, the percentage jumped to 63 percent for Democratic respondents, while the Republican percentage remained unchanged.

The shooting also may have modestly changed voters’ minds about which party they most trust to handle gun issues. Prior to the shooting, Republicans had a 3-point advantage; afterward, Democrats gained a 1-point edge. While few members of either party budged, independent voters swung from giving the GOP a 17-point lead on the issue to giving Democrats a 6-point advantage.

It’s less clear, however, whether the aftermath of the Orlando attack will directly benefit any presidential candidate, especially if it’s framed as an issue related to terrorism rather than gun violence. Voters are somewhat more likely to disapprove of Trump’s response — 52 percent of those who followed news about the shooting disapprove of how he reacted, compared to 46 percent who disapprove of presumptive Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton’s reaction. But 39 percent of voters say they trust Trump more than Clinton to handle the threat of terrorism, while 36 percent say the opposite. A solid fifth don’t trust either candidate.

There’s no guarantee that fears raised by the Orlando shooting will even last until the election. Far from reflecting an unprecedented sea change, the newest poll shows public opinion returning to about where it was after last year’s shooting in San Bernardino, California. That attack, like a host of others before it, failed to produce much in the way of political change before the nation’s concerns dissipated.

The HuffPost/YouGov poll consisted of 1,000 completed interviews conducted June 14 through June 16 among U.S. adults, using a sample selected from YouGov’s opt-in online panel to match the demographics and other characteristics of the adult U.S. population.

The Huffington Post has teamed up with YouGov to conduct daily opinion polls.You can learn more about this project and take part in YouGov’s nationally representative opinion polling. Data from all HuffPost/YouGov polls can be found here. More details on the polls’ methodology are available here.

Most surveys report a margin of error that represents some, but not all, potential survey errors. YouGov’s reports include a model-based margin of error, which rests on a specific set of statistical assumptions about the selected sample, rather than the standard methodology for random probability sampling. If these assumptions are wrong, the model-based margin of error may also be inaccurate. Click here for a more detailed explanation of the model-based margin of error.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

My Child's World Scares Me

2016-06-14-1465940057-5120107-sad.jpg
Image credit: Huffington Post

I have a toddler. When I look at him, and peer into his innocent brown eyes I see good, I see happy, I see naivete, and I see hope; hope that the ills and evils of our world will somehow be fixed.

Conversely, when I open up a newspaper, turn on my twitter feed, turn on the news, or listen to the radio, I see, read, or hear a completely different story.

I see anger.

I see hate.

I see evil and terror.

I see hostility.

I see greed.

I see torture. Torture of other humans and torture of sentient animals.

And I don’t know how to resolve these two starkly contrasting views of the world. The one view that is hopeful, and the one view that is hopeless. And this terrifies me.

As a species we seem to be very skilled at killing and/or decimating – populations. We kill animals, we kill each other, and for all intents and purposes we kill our planet.

Every day I read articles about the decimation of species, from elephants, to rhinoceroses, to whales, to certain species of dolphins and porpoises. Humans are destructive.

Our ways of fishing with trawling nets or gill nets kill hundreds of thousands of animals in by-catch. Some populations purposefully slaughter dolphins or other whales for sport. Other groups murder 5-ton elephants for a few pounds of ivory and greed.

Finally, certain groups murder other humans over resources, over religion, over culture or other life choices. When will it end? When will it stop? When will we learn to live peacefully on our planet without doing unnecessary harm to animals and to each other?

Given that my background is in public health, I try to frame this problem in the “public health” perspective, to find an upstream approach to solving some of these problems, to have the most impact efficiently and effectively.

However, I don’t know what the solution for hate is. I don’t know an upstream approach to stop hate. I’m not sure I know of any approach to stop hate!

And, this is what terrifies me.

I don’t want to raise my child in a world where I have to look over my shoulder. I don’t want to raise my child in a world where I’m afraid to take him certain places, because I never quite know who or what is lurking around the corner.

I want to raise my child in a world that still values life, not a world that values riches and “sameness.” I want to raise my child in a world that respects animals, and doesn’t treat them as “resources” for the killing. I want to raise my child in a world where we don’t need phrases such as: “Worth More Alive” (#worthmorealive).

In prehistoric times, our ancestors primarily killed for sustenance; killing only what was needed to survive. They were hunters and gatherers. Now we kill for “a treasure,” or for a “euphoria.” We kill rare things because we can, because they bring in a lot of money; not out of need.

We kill each other over differences of opinion, or differences in religion. But, why? What is so wrong with being “different?” Do we really know what we are “fighting” or killing over?

And, to add insult to injury, the general level of discourse around these problems is negative or discordance, or devolves into anger or the blame game, not solutions.

I by no means am perfect. But, I do know that we need to be more tolerant, more understanding, and less filled with hate.

This is our home, we all need to share it, all 7.4+ billion of us humans plus the billions of animals and plants on the planet. Neither Earth nor animals not need us to survive, but we sure do need them. We do not own Earth. We do not own the animals. We are merely one species among millions that are passing through time on this planet.

For the sake of our children and our children’s children, we need to find a way to live in harmony with each other, and with the other beings on the planet, before we destroy it or each other.

Without a doubt, I would really love to say I still have hope, and when I look at my son, I do, I get that warm and fuzzy feeling that everything will still be OK. But, when I turn on the news, it sure does make me question.

Twitter: recipe4survival

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.