The World's Fastest Rocket Just Launched a Secret Spy Satellite

A secret satellite was launched into space today. We don’t know just what it’s doing in space. But! We can see in these pictures exactly how it got there: aboard an incredibly fast rocket.

Read more…

Huawei seeks to overtake Apple in smartphone shipments

huaweip9camera-980x420IDC’s most recent smartphone shipment report suggests that as Apple’s smartphone unit shipments decline, Huawei rises, and Samsung pulls further away from the pack. In the second quarter of the year 2016, Samsung is well ahead of the smartphone-selling group with an estimated 77-million units shipped over the past three months. Next is Apple with an estimated 40.4-million units shipped, … Continue reading

DOOM’s big free update tomorrow brings two multiplayer modes

Bethesda Softworks will release a big free update for DOOM (2016) tomorrow, the second of its kind for the title. This particular update adds a pair of new multiplayer game modes, addressing the mostly justified criticism about the game’s lackluster multiplayer experience. The new game modes are comprised of capture-the-flag with a single flag and moving bases and a capture-and-hold … Continue reading

Virgin America's app has Spotify playlists based on your trip

Virgin America revealed a major overhaul to its website back in 2014, and now it finally has an app for Android and iOS. As you might expect, the retooled mobile software has a similar look and feel to the web portal, but you can use it to book fligh…

Ride-hailing apps like Uber will be legal in China soon

Considering how much business Uber does in China, it’s kind of hard to imagine that ride-hailing apps aren’t exactly legal in the country. Well, they weren’t, but they’re about to be. Chinese regulators have passed a new law that clears up the legal…

Facebook collects your best birthday wishes in new recap videos

Facebook is already the hub for online birthday wishes from people you haven’t seen in person since the late 90s, but the site isn’t done celebrating your special day once the clock strikes midnight. Facebook has rolled out Birthday Recap Videos, a 4…

What Peru's New President Can Learn From Brazil's Fight Against Corruption


Paul F. Lagunes, Columbia University

From the U.K.’s Brexit vote to the U.S. presidential race, a handful of campaigns and elections around the world dominate news cycle after news cycle.

One election that has gotten less attention than it deserves is the one in Peru, which recently picked a new president. He’s set to take office this week.

Pedro Pablo Kuczynski, an Oxford- and Princeton-trained economist with ample experience in government who is informally known as PPK, will be sworn in on July 28 after narrowly winning the second June contest.

His rival, Keiko Furjimori, the politically adept daughter of a notoriously corrupt former president who is serving a sentence of 25 years in jail, won the first round of elections on Alberto Fujimori’s legacy of establishing order.

Although she distanced herself from the sketchier aspects of her father’s record, the balancing act eventually failed after it became known that one of her closest allies was being investigated on suspicion of money laundering. The scandal reminded voters of the unfortunate events from the elder Fujimori’s time in office.

As he takes the helm, PPK would do well to remember that he won the presidency, in large part, because of how sick Peruvians are of corruption (all of PPK’s recent predecessors face corruption accusations).

PPK should, therefore, prioritize the issue. To do so, he can look to neighboring Brazil, where corruption is successfully being prosecuted, as an example of how to tackle the problem through institutional channels.

My own research shows that corruption control in Latin America is within reach as long as the corrupt face a real risk of being punished. Full disclosure: I am currently engaged in a formal collaboration with two anti-corruption forces in Peru — a civil society group and the Office of the Comptroller General — that have the manpower and technical capacity to support an anti-corruption drive, essential conditions of what led to Brazil’s success.


Peruvians protest against corruption ahead of the recent election.
Guadalupe Pardo/Reuters

A scandal-plagued region

Latin America’s scandals are as numerous as they are noxious. Here are just a few of the more recent ones.

In Argentina, several of former President Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner’s associates are facing corruption charges. Among them, her secretary of public works was caught trying to stash large sums of cash at a convent.

In Mexico, President Enrique Peña Nieto and his family were found to be living in a home built and owned by Grupo Higa, a construction firm that had obtained over 80 contracts from the government. The home has since been returned to the construction company in question.

Chile, a country that often tops Latin America’s performance indicators (see, for example, this report), also witnessed an apparent conflict of interest. President Michelle Bachelet’s son was accused in 2015 of leveraging political connections to obtain a US$10 million bank loan that his wife used to buy land and sell it for a large profit. The loan was granted a day after his mother was reelected in 2014.

In Guatemala, a United Nations-backed agency played a pivotal role in uncovering a multi-million dollar customs fraud case involving President Otto Perez Molina. Perez Molina resigned and so joined Fujimori on the list of Latin American presidents who have been removed from office because of corruption.


Brazil’s Dilma Rousseff may become the latest Latin American president to be removed from power.
Paulo Whitaker/Reuters

Brazil stands apart

A discussion about failed presidencies inevitably brings us to recent events in Brazil, the host of the soon to be inaugurated Summer Olympics. Recently elected President Dilma Rousseff was removed from office in May and is currently in the midst of an impeachment trial in the Senate.

While her trial examines misreporting of government accounts, the biggest scandal in Brazil is actually the unrelated Lavo Jato Scheme. According to allegations, Lava Jato involved skimming a fraction of the value of state-run oil company Petrobras’s contracts from 2004 to 2014 in order to fund personal and party accounts. Billions appear to have been paid in bribes to Petrobras officials and politicians.

Numerous individuals, including 13 senators, 22 federal deputies and two governors, are under investigation – including Eduardo Cunha, the lawmaker who led the effort to impeach Rousseff. He recently resigned from his job as speaker of the lower house.

What sets Brazil apart from its neighbors, however, is how forcefully its institutions – particularly federal prosecutors and the judiciary – have reacted to corruption. Ironically, the scandals are a positive sign – they show that there is an effort to ensure accountability. So far, authorities have made more than 160 arrests and convicted over 100 individuals. Among those sent to jail is Marcelo Odebrecht, the former CEO of South America’s largest construction company. Jorge Zelada, a former director of Petrobras, was convicted of money-laundering and corruption. The former treasurer of the Worker’s Party, Joao Vaccari Neto, was handed a 15-year sentence.

Thus, Brazil seems to get the prosecutorial aspect of corruption control right, which is more than can be said about other Latin American regimes, where corruption cases appear to outnumber successful prosecutions.


Alberto Fujimori, who ruled Peru for a decade, is serving a 25-year sentence for corruption and other crimes.
Enrique Castro-Mendivil/Reuters

Costs of corruption

Peru has not been as persistent or successful in prosecuting corruption.

A major exception to this was the case of Alberto Fujimori, who ran Peru from 1990 to 2000. After fleeing to Japan following a rigged election, he was extradited and jailed in 2009 for his responsibility in ordering an illegal search, the killing of people by pro-government militias and bribing media outlets.

But that is a relatively rare example of justice being served. If only based on accusations, grand corruption remains a problem in Peru.

Presidents Alan Garcia and Alejandro Toledo have been questioned on account of home purchases in two of Lima’s wealthiest neighborhoods. Many also take issue with Garcia’s decision to pardon 400 convicted drug traffickers in what has been dubbed the narco indultos (pardons) case.

The late Alfonso Quiroz, a respected historian, estimated that the corruption of Fujimori’s regime cost Peru $1.5 billion to $4 billion. More recently, some have suggested that corruption costs the country more than $3.5 billion a year.

These figures may lack precision, but there is little doubt that corruption affects all levels of the Peruvian state.

At the subnational level, in 2014, 22 out of 25 outgoing regional presidents were being investigated for embezzlement – one of them was even accused of murdering a local politician and stealing millions from phantom public works. This same governor was said to have ties with a former campaign advisor to outgoing President Ollanta Humala.

President Humala’s troubles did not end there. He faced questions about allegedly taking bribes from Odebrecht, the Brazilian engineering firm at the heart of the Petrobras scandal. His wife also came under investigation on charges of money laundering. The investigation focusing on the first lady was called off a year ago, but not before some of her spending on luxury items had come into question.


Brazil has been successful prosecuting ‘big fish,’ such as former Senator Gim Argello.
Rodolfo Buhrer/Reuters

Confronting corruption

The advantage of comparing Brazil and Peru is that it illustrates the extent to which the former’s effort seems to contrast with the region’s standard response to corruption.

Whether on the street or in the courts of justice, Brazilians have confronted corruption in a deliberate manner. If the heads of the corrupt were hung on display as trophies, Brazil’s exhibition hall would be packed with fresh catches.

Meanwhile, for all the corruption allegations brewing in Peru, there is a sense that many of the corrupt are exempt from punishment. In a 2015 report about human rights, the U.S. Department of State declared: Peruvian law “provides criminal penalties for officials engaged in corruption; however, the government did not always implement the law effectively, and officials often engaged in corrupt practices with impunity.”

This foreign message was not without a receptive local audience.

The State Department’s report was picked up by the Peruvian press, and its thesis found support in the fact that the country’s Office of the Comptroller General initiated thousands of criminal charges, but the judiciary has followed up with only a few hundred sentences. Even accounting for potential flaws in the cases against the accused, the enforcement gap is evident.

There is hope

And yet, saying that impunity is king in Peru is taking the claim too far.

The country’s authorities have successfully prosecuted a number of high-level corrupt officials, including the man directly behind the previously mentioned narco indultos. Fujimori’s face behind bars remains a solid graft-busting credential.

Rather than ignoring the issue or becoming immune to its impact, Peruvians consistently state corruption as one of their two main concerns. The topic is regularly covered by the media. Civil society is actively doing its part to counter the problem, and the country has even seen one of its own elected to chair of Transparency International, the world’s leading anti-corruption watchdog.

So, there is hope.

And there is hope that Peru’s new president will contribute to improving the status quo. During his campaign, PPK identified structural obstacles to a well-functioning state before putting forth a series of anti-corruption proposals. He called for the creation of a national anti-corruption system, emphasized the need to further professionalize the civil service, suggested reforming the police and judiciary, and proposed reducing bureaucratic hurdles, among others.

Admittedly, corruption is not Peru’s only concern. Some of the country’s leading intellectuals are calling on PPK to prioritize the fight against crime, as well as socioeconomic and geographic inclusion.

This is a wise suggestion, but PPK arguably owes his victory to an anti-Fujimori vote. As one Peruvian scholar put it, the elections presented the electorate with a choice between decency and corruption. Voters picked him as a way to shun the corruption of the past. Peru’s new president should reciprocate by tackling corruption of the present.

In Brazil, the fact that the corrupt are facing arrests, prosecutions, and jail time will inhibit (though not quite eradicate) future misdeeds. PPK’s ultimate legacy could be a more honest public administration for his country, but only if he commits fully to fighting corruption.

To quote Peru’s new president, “I believe the fight (against corruption) begins at the top.”

The Conversation

Paul F. Lagunes, Assistant Professor of International and Public Affairs, Columbia University

This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Don't Bust: Iranian-Americans Need To Have A Voice In The Political Process

Iranian-Americans face the same conundrum all American voters have during this year’s presidential election. You can either vote for Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump, a third party candidate, or abstain all together. In 2012, about 30 percent of Iranian-Americans eligible to vote abstained on Election Day. Those numbers might be much higher now.

The argument why neither Clinton nor Trump are palatable for the U.S. presidency are similar across the board, but for some Iranian-Americans there seems to be added contempt directed towards Clinton’s comments regarding Iranians and Iran over the years. Some have even likened a vote for Clinton as being equivalent to a Mexican voting for Trump. So what is at stake as an Iranian-American in this upcoming U.S. election?

Clinton’s feelings about Iran

Fresh in the mind of Iranian-Americans was when former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton called “the Iranians” her enemies during the first democratic debate in October 2015. She was likely referring to the Iranian government, but her language–especially during a time of heightened Islamophobia later exasperated by her rival Donald Trump–was offensive because it could’ve meant anything from the Iranian Diaspora to the 80 million Iranians residing in Iran.

Then there was Clinton’s comment when she told Good Morning America during the 2008 presidential election, “I want the Iranians to know that if I’m the president, we will attack Iran.” It was a reference to if Iran ever attacked Israel, which is silent knowledge when it comes to U.S. foreign policy regardless of who is president. Clinton followed up with, “That’s a terrible thing to say but those people who run Iran need to understand that because that perhaps will deter them from doing something that would be reckless, foolish and tragic.” Some Iranian-Americans took her statement to heart because they still have relatives in Iran and continue to travel back and forth. Clinton continues to take this stance, but not with such harsh wording.

While Clinton is a known foreign policy hawk, despite her controversial statements on Iran, it is worth noting she endorsed and continues to endorse the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), better known as the Iran Deal. Donald Trump vehemently opposes the nuclear deal to the extent it is reportedly one of the main reasons why he ran for office. Clinton likes to take credit for leading the sanctions regime on Iran and argues that was how she got Tehran to the negotiating table in the first place–depending on whom you ask.

Clinton’s policies aside, the irony of abstention is Iranian-Americans saw how it played out in Iran during the 2005 presidential elections. Many Iranians boycotted the election due to disillusionment with President Mohammad Khatami’s lack of reform and inability to stand up during times of tension like the 1999 student uprisings. Their actions essentially ushered in the presidency of little known hardliner Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on a wave of conservative votes. The backlash was felt in 2009 when Iranians poured out to vote for reformist candidate Mir Hussein Mousavi. The outcome of that election is another story.

Then there’s the argument about how minority groups aren’t voting for Donald Trump. Wrong. Not only are there some Latinos voting for Trump, some Iranian-Americans plan to as well. As one friend put it, “you really believe Crooked Hillary would be a better president than Trump?” Even though only eight percent of Iranian-Americans identify as republicans, the scales may tip this election season.

Why vote

This isn’t a plea to ask Iranian-Americans to vote for Hillary Clinton. However, when it comes to minorities, it’s unclear whether we stand a chance against a man who spews vitriol and rants about bans and walls. It’s also a known fact the Iranian-American vote isn’t a game changer the way the Latino vote is in the U.S. presidential election. Aside from the usual spiel about not taking democratic elections for granted, there is more to voting than determining a new president. By abstaining, there’s a missed opportunity to participate in legislative issues and elect representatives who take stances on policies Iranian-Americans may be in favor of or against.

If not for protecting the Iran Deal and preventing another unnecessary war, Iranian-Americans need to have a voice in the political process. The passing of H.R. 158 is a perfect example of that. In December 2015, the bill passed under most of our noses and by the time the Iranian-American community unified, it was too late. The updated Visa Waiver Program affected families and friends in the European Union (EU). The new law suddenly impacted everything from vacations, weddings, to family emergencies. EU citizens didn’t even have to have blood ties to Iran. Solely by traveling to Iran for work or pleasure, EU citizens now have to obtain a visa to travel to the United States. Since the Visa Waiver Program is based off of reciprocity, the EU has expressed interest in taking a similar action against U.S. citizens, but has since been tied up with Brexit.*

If you don’t know where to start, there are initiatives like the National Iranian American Council’s Beshkan the Vote that are advocating the importance of the Iranian-American vote during the 2016 election. They argue, “Your vote is your voice. If we want to have a say in the political process, we must use our voice. This is our year to protect our values, prevent discrimination, and advance peace and diplomacy.”

That’s something we can all agree with regardless of political affiliation.

*NOTE: Iraq, Syria, and Sudan are also listed.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

A Message Of Hope For South Sudan

Over the past three years, I’ve had the privilege to meet and work with hundreds of young women and men from South Sudan. Each time I am able to visit their country and speak with them, I am always struck by their enduring hope for the future of their nation and by how hard they are willing to work in order to make peace a reality.

That’s why it’s been especially heart-breaking in recent weeks to see South Sudan slide further from peace, toward instability and conflict. This month, one that should have been a celebration of the five-year anniversary of that nation’s independence, was instead marked by renewed chaos and bloodshed. I join the international community in condemning this latest violence in the strongest of terms, and I call upon both sides to come together and, for the sake of their country, honor the peace agreement signed last August.

The last three years have not been easy for South Sudan. A civil war that started in 2013 has seen as many as 50,000 people killed and more than 2 million displaced — about 20 percent of the population. The human cost of this conflict has been staggering.

But in the midst of enormous obstacles, so many of the young people I know in South Sudan are trying to help. They’re mediating long-standing conflicts in their communities. They’re running a soccer league at a camp for displaced persons. They’re traveling around their states calling for peace and non-violence. These youth, simply put, are remarkable. Their passion and their dedication inspire me. And yet I think they are the rule, not the exception. I think there are millions more like them all throughout South Sudan who yearn for peace and are willing to work for it.

In a message to the people of South Sudan last summer, shortly after a peace agreement was signed, I said that peace does not exist on a piece of paper. True peace is cultivated in the hearts and minds of the people, and it can only be expressed through dialogue and reconciliation.

Even though I can never truly grasp the depth of the pain felt by those in South Sudan who have suffered so much, I understand how difficult it is in the face of such unspeakable tragedy to find the strength to forgive and to forge acceptance. Moving forward together, as a unified nation, will not be easy. But it is necessary in order for the people of South Sudan, who for decades have endured war and violence, to finally inherit the dream of peace that they have been promised so many times.

Martin Luther King, Jr. said, “The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends towards justice.” One day, there will be peace in South Sudan. It is my hope and sincere belief that, through the collective will and selfless actions of the people who crave peace so badly — and with whatever support the international community can offer — soon, all children in South Sudan will sit in schools, not refugee camps, and they will learn together as they prepare to rebuild their nation for the next generation and for every generation to come.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

The Scientific Argument for Mastering One Thing at a Time

Many people, myself included, have multiple areas of life they would like to improve. For example, I would like to reach more people with my writing, to lift heavier weights at the gym, and to start practicing mindfulness more consistently. Those are just a few of the goals I find desirable and you probably have a long list yourself.

The problem is, even if we are committed to working hard on our goals, our natural tendency is to revert back to our old habits at some point. Making a permanent lifestyle change is really difficult.

Recently, I’ve come across a few research studies that (just maybe) will make these difficult lifestyle changes a little bit easier. As you’ll see, however, the approach to mastering many areas of life is somewhat counterintuitive.

Too Many Good Intentions

If you want to master multiple habits and stick to them for good, then you need to figure out how to be consistent. How can you do that?

Well, here is one of the most robust findings from psychology research on how to actually follow through on your goals:

Research has shown that you are 2x to 3x more likely to stick with your habits if you make a specific plan for when, where, and how you will perform the behavior. For example, in one study scientists asked people to fill out this sentence: “During the next week, I will partake in at least 20 minutes of vigorous exercise on [DAY] at [TIME OF DAY] at/in [PLACE].”

Researchers found that people who filled out this sentence were 2x to 3x more likely to actually exercise compared to a control group who did not make plans for their future behavior. Psychologists call these specific plans “implementation intentions” because they state when, where, and how you intend to implement a particular behavior.

This finding is well proven and has been repeated in hundreds studies across a broad range of areas. For example, implementation intentions have been found to increase the odds that people will start exercising, begin recycling, stick with studying, and even stop smoking.

However (and this is crucial to understand) follow-up research has discovered implementation intentions only work when you focus on one goal at a time.In fact, researchers found that people who tried to accomplish multiple goals were less committed and less likely to succeed than those who focused on a single goal. [1]

This is important, so let me repeat: developing a specific plan for when, where, and how you will stick to a new habit will dramatically increase the odds that you will actually follow through, but only if you focus on a single goal.

One goal

What Happens When You Focus on One Thing

Here is another science-based reason to focus on one habit at a time:

When you begin practicing a new habit it requires a lot of conscious effort to remember to do it. After awhile, however, the pattern of behavior becomes easier. Eventually, your new habit becomes a normal routine and the process is more or less mindless and automatic.

Researchers have a fancy term for this process called “automaticity.” Automaticity is the ability to perform a behavior without thinking about each step, which allows the pattern to become automatic and habitual.

But here’s the thing: automaticity only occurs as the result of lots of repetition and practice. The more reps you put in, the more automatic a behavior becomes.

For example, this chart shows how long it takes for people to make a habit out of taking a 10-minute walk after breakfast. In the beginning, the degree of automaticity is very low. After 30 days, the habit is becoming fairly routine. After 60 days, the process is about as automatic as it can become. [2]

Habit automaticity for walking

The most important thing to note is that there is some “tipping point” at which new habits become more or less automatic. The time it takes to build a habit depends on many factors including how difficult the habit is, what your environment is like, your genetics, and more.

That said, the study cited above found the average habit takes about 66 days to become automatic. (Don’t put too much stock in that number. The range in the study was very wide and the only reasonable conclusion you should make is that it will take months for new habits to become sticky.)

Change Your Life Without Changing Your Entire Life

Alright, let’s review what I have suggested to you so far and figure out some practical takeaways.

You are 2x to 3x more likely to follow through with a habit if you make a specific plan for when, where, and how you are going to implement it. This is known as an implementation intention.
You should focus entirely on one habit. Research has found that implementation intentions do not work if you try to improve multiple habits at the same time.

Research has shown that any given habit becomes more automatic with more practice. On average, it takes at least two months for new habits to become automatic behaviors.
This brings us to the punchline of this article…

The counterintuitive insight from all of this research is that the best way to change your entire life is by not changing your entire life. Instead, it is best to focus on one specific habit, work on it until you master it, and make it an automatic part of your daily life. Then, repeat the process for the next habit. [3]

The way to master more things in the long-run is to simply focus on one thing right now.

James Clear writes at JamesClear.com, where he shares self-improvement tips based on proven scientific research. You can read his best articles or join his free newsletter to learn how to build habits that stick.

This article was originally published on JamesClear.com.

FOOTNOTES

  1. Too Much of a Good Thing: The Benefits of Implementation Intentions Depend on the Number of Goals“by Amy N. Dalton and Stephen A. Spiller (2012). Journal of Consumer Research.
  2. How are habits formed: Modeling habit formation in the real world” by Phillippa Lally, Cornelia H. M. Van Jaarsveld, Henry W. W. Potts and Jane Wardle (2010). European Journal of Social Psychology.
  3. You might be thinking, “But you don’t understand, I have so many things I need to change in my life.” Consider this: solving deep life issues often requires some space to sit, think, and figure out a better solution. If you feel like you’re drowning and can barely keep your head above water, then you will almost never find the time to figure out a better approach. By picking one habit and mastering it you not only make progress, but also free up the mental space you need to think through deeper issues. Sometimes you need a good tactic so you can make enough room to figure out a better strategy.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.