Clinton Foundation Defenders Sound A Lot Like Citizens United Apologists

So, that happened: This week, The Associated Press rocked the Clinton campaign’s world after releasing a report detailing new concerns about the Clinton Foundation. In that story, the AP alleges that more than half the people who represent private interests who donated to the Clinton family charity received access and other favors from the State Department during Hillary Clinton’s tenure as secretary of state. Clinton’s defenders have responded to the story by pointing to the fact that the AP didn’t provide any evidence of a quid pro quo ― a straight line of evidence connecting money offered to a deed performed.

But defining political corruption strictly along these lines has only been a recent legal innovation ― one that flies in the face of a century of case law that held that even the appearance of corruption was a de facto threat to good governance. That’s all changed because of the way the Supreme Court ruled in cases like 2010’s Citizens United v. FEC. On this week’s edition of the “So, That Happened” podcast, we mark the occasion where you can no longer differentiate between these two sets of apologists.

 

 

 

Elsewhere on the podcast: Over in the Trump campaign, they’re working hard at the pivot they’ve promised to make for months, and the most interesting thing that’s emerged is that on the reality TV host’s signature issue ― his draconian approach to immigration ― Donald Trump no longer seems to know what he either believes or says. Did Trump mean it when he said his Republican rivals were soft on immigration? And if so, why does he suddenly seem to prefer the immigration policies of low-energy Jeb Bush?

Meanwhile, a pharmaceutical company called Mylan is under fire this week after raising the prices of their epi-pens ― a device used by the severely allergic to prevent a fatal allergy attack ― by 400%. Consumers are angry, as are members of Congress, who are demanding that Mylan reverse course. If only that same Congress hadn’t continually made policy choices that allowed for these monopolistic practices in the first place.

Finally, for some third-party perspective on our presidential race, we welcome back our favorite Bernie Sanders supporter, the always effervescent Tim Black of “The Tim Black Show.” We’ll ask him if Clinton’s managed to close the deal with him, and whether or not folks like him are having an impact on Democratic Party policies at all.

“So, That Happened” is hosted by Jason Linkins, Zach Carter and Arthur Delaney. Joining them this week: Tim Black of “The Tim Black Show,” as well as Huffington Post reporter Elise Foley. 

This podcast was produced, edited and engineered by Christine Conetta.

To listen to this podcast later, download our show on iTunes. While you’re there, please subscribe to, rate and review our show. You can check out other HuffPost podcasts here.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Proof That The Great Recession Has Yet To Release Its Grip

Buried deep in a speech that President Obama delivered at the height of the Great Recession was a line that has remained etched in my psyche. When Obama was acknowledging the economic devastation that the recession had wrought on individuals, he predicted, “And some people won’t ever recover.”

At the time, I wondered who he meant. Finally, that mystery has been solved. He was talking about me and people my age who ― like me ― lost their jobs, their home equity and saw their portfolio values crash and burn just as they were entering the countdown years to our retirement.

And it comes straight from the horse’s mouth: The Congressional Budget Office released a report last week that said the median family wealth for Americans age 50-64 dropped from around $250,000 in 2007 to less than $200,000 in 2010 ― and then continued to fall precipitously to about $150,000 in 2013. That’s a 40 percent drop in our wealth in just six years, notes Politico, and no, that’s not a good thing.

While all generations were slammed by the recession, the one generation that has lacked sufficient time to recover was mine ― and that’s what the CBO has finally gotten around to saying. We were pushed out of our jobs at the worst possible time, coerced to sign severance agreements agreeing not to sue for age discrimination, and in some cases, insultingly offered job “counseling” for things like “how to update your resume after 30 years of not needing to.”

Not to pick nits, but the news of our terminations was frequently delivered harshly and without regard to the decades of loyal service we had given our masters. Our ages were held against us. Our many years of experience had put us not just at the top of the salary scale but at the top of the list of ways to cut costs because of it. Did the government step in to protect us? No, it did not.

But as hard as those termination days were to swallow, the worst was yet to come. People in their 50s and early 60s who were tapped on the shoulder and given an hour to clean out their desks, also quickly learned that the employment world was pretty damn hostile to them. The skills that had served them well ― well enough to buy houses and cars and pay for their kids’ college bills ― were no longer valued. Older people wanted to work but couldn’t find any. Employers freely ― and without regard for the law ― advertised that they only wanted to hire “young” people or “digital natives.” Older workers were encouraged to “age-desensitize” themselves ― don’t give away your age by stating the year you graduated, things like that. Did the government step in to protect us against age discrimination? No, it did not.

We learned to hustle to make ends meet. We embraced the gig economy, stringing together part-time and freelance jobs and in many cases working for peanuts ― and certainly not for health coverage or vacations or other benefits that come with real jobs. We stayed unemployed longer than any other age group, fell victim to asinine beliefs like “only the young can innovate,” and “older workers aren’t a good cultural fit,” and sent thousands of resumes into the black hole where online job applications go to die and at the end of the day had very little to show for it. Did the government step in to help us? No, it did not.

We tried our best. But 1.5 million of us (people age 50-plus) still lost our homes to foreclosure from 2007 to 2011. In addition to those 1.5 million, as of December 2011, according to an AARP report, another 3.5 million people age 50+ were underwater on their mortgages ― meaning they owed more than their home was worth and had no equity; 600,000 loans of people age 50+ were in foreclosure, and another 625,000 loans were 90 or more days delinquent. It was grim. Making it grimmer though was that the banks were allowed to behave atrociously ― refusing to lower interest rates, reduce principal sums, reject reasonable short sale offers and kicking people to the curb for owing less than what the bank resold the house for a month later. The government? Nowhere to be seen.

So how are things now? I frequently hear from readers in their 50s and 60s who still can’t find work and in many cases, have just given up trying. Age discrimination ― especially in the tech industry but honestly throughout all sectors ― runs rampant in hiring.

People in their 50s and 60s worry constantly about whether they will have enough money to live on for the rest of their lives. They question whether they will ever be able to stop work and retire.

The CBO findings pretty much answer those questions with a resounding “no.” And it’s a problem. The CBO puts a polite spin on things and suggests that there will be “a significant retirement challenge ahead for policymakers” coming from those millions of Americans who were near retirement when the Great Recession leveled them like a bowling pin.

Yes, there will be a significant retirement challenge ahead for policymakers ― take that one to the nearest arrogant bank. Because you can bet your bottom dollar that we will be turning en masse to the government to ensure that we don’t fall into poverty. This time, let’s hope we are met with a better response.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

British Economy Escapes Brexit Blow, For Now

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

LONDON, Aug 26 (Reuters) – Britain’s high streets are heaving with shoppers despite June’s shock vote to leave the European Union, big companies have reported few signs of distress and some tabloid newspapers are even talking about a post-Brexit economic boom.

The overwhelming view from economists is that it is too early to know how Britain will cope with years of Brexit uncertainty – but there is a growing belief the country can avoid a recession that only weeks ago was regarded as likely.

On the face of it, the early optimism contrasts with the pre-referendum warning from former Prime Minister David Cameron that a Brexit vote would put a “bomb under the economy.”

Retail sales in August reversed much of an immediate post-Brexit vote fall, with retailers reporting their strongest sales in six months, industry data showed on Thursday, partly due to a weaker pound attracting overseas buyers. Official figures out last week showed the number of people claiming unemployment benefit fell unexpectedly in July. 

Before the June 23 referendum, the British finance ministry had warned a Brexit vote would mean homeowners facing higher borrowing costs, pushing the economy into a “DIY recession,” and that equity prices were likely to fall.

However, nearly half of mortgage borrowers look set to gain from the Bank of England’s interest rate cut on Aug. 4, while British equity markets have risen.

Some British newspapers which supported the Leave campaign have hailed such news. “Remainers were WRONG!” the Daily Express declared earlier this month, adding: “Brexit Britain booms.”

But most economists do not share this jubilance and caution these positive signals may have little bearing on the long-term outlook for the economy, which must contend with years of uncertainty as Britain extricates itself from the EU.

‘WE DON’T KNOW’

New British Prime Minister Theresa May has said she will not trigger the EU’s Article 50 this year, to begin formal talks with the bloc to negotiate the terms of Britain’s exit from the EU and its future trading relationship with the bloc.

“The fact that the UK avoided an immediate crisis does not tell us much about the future,” said Holger Schmieding, chief economist at Berenberg Bank, adding he thought Britain would probably avoid a technical recession – defined as two consecutive quarters of falling economic output.

Business surveys and some forward-looking indicators of inflation already offer reasons for caution.

Price pressures in factories – which feed through into consumer prices – shot higher after the pound’s post-referendum plunge, posing a threat to consumers’ future spending power.

Market research firm GfK’s gauge of consumer confidence also fell sharply after the vote. The survey often predicts changes in household spending in the following quarters.

A YouGov/CEBR gauge of consumer morale, published on Friday, showed consumers have regained some of the confidence they lost after the referendum, but researchers warned this positive trend could easily change next year.

The outlook for the housing market, the bedrock of British consumer wealth, is also unclear: a Reuters poll on Thursday suggested the Brexit vote will have a negative impact on both prices and turnover.

Charles Goodhart, a former BoE interest-rate setter, said so far there had been almost no data on important areas of the economy such as investment, inventory levels and construction.

“I think it would be very dangerous to take a position either that it’s all going to be alright and that the fears were massively overdone, or that the fears were justified,” said Goodhart, a professor at the London School of Economics, said. “The answer is, frankly: we don’t know.”

FTSE RISES

While the mood among economists remains one of concern, it has brightened across financial markets.

Investors were braced for a global economic shock after a vote for Brexit, but the FTSE 100 index of UK blue-chip companies is about 8 percent higher since the referendum, helped by overseas earnings that will benefit from the fall in the value of the pound.

The more domestically focused FTSE 250 index of mid-sized companies is up by about 5 percent.

Many big companies have reported little immediate impact from the vote in Britain, including retailers John Lewis and Next, the world’s biggest staffing company Adecco and carmaker BMW.

Some major employers – carmaker Nissan, for example – say their plans for investment in Britain will hinge on the trade deals it strikes with other countries.

Martin Sorrell, chief executive of the world’s largest advertising group WPP, said there was little clarity on when Britain would even begin negotiating its EU exit and that his company’s clients were increasingly cautious.

“Our own position will depend on what gets negotiated,” he told Reuters.

The pound’s fall since the referendum – it was down almost 15 percent at one point versus the dollar – has benefited some companies; it has boosted manufacturers’ exports, for example. But it also reflects the weaker outlook for the economy.

“In essence, the currency markets are saying that all UK assets are worth less than they used to be,” Rupert Pennant-Lea, a former BoE deputy governor, wrote in the Financial Times.

“The British have become poorer than they were before the votes were counted on June 23, and that reality will become clearer as the months go by.”

But investors, responding to the recent upbeat data, have cut their bets against a weaker pound this week, which has helped lift the currency. Sterling has started to edge higher against major currencies, but it remains around 11 percent lower against the dollar than before the referendum, underscoring how investors see the challenge ahead for Britain’s economy.

BEYOND BRITAIN

Many international investors had feared a Brexit vote would undermine the EU and hurt business and market confidence across the euro zone. But surveys point to little impact so far.

As a result, many banks are revising forecasts for further European Central Bank stimulus. JPMorgan says it no longer expects the ECB to cut rates or announce an extension of its bond-buying program in September after solid growth data.

The Federal Reserve had warned extensively of the risk of financial reverberations from a Brexit vote, which was one of the factors that led to it holding off from raising rates this year. But the U.S. economy has barely flinched since the vote.

For now, economists are playing the long game. Official data due next month will offer a better gauge of Britain’s resilience to Brexit, providing the first detailed breakdown of how manufacturing, services and construction firms fared in July.

“Any short-term growth slowdown matters but the economics of Brexit are mostly about the long term,” said Robert Wood, an economist with BofA Merrill Lynch. “Leaving the EU single market is, in our view, likely to make the UK less open to trade and therefore damage economic performance in the long run.”

(Additional reporting by Mike Dolan, Kate Holton and Jamie McGeever; Editing by William Schomberg and Pravin Char)

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Refugees In Italy Donate Money And Help Clean Up After Earthquake

LONDON (Thomson Reuters Foundation) – Asylum seekers in Italy have rallied to help survivors of the earthquake that killed at least 250 people in Italy, donating money and helping to clear up after the disaster, charity workers said on Thursday.

In the southern region of Calabria more than 70 refugees and asylum seekers gave up a daily allowance for personal expenses of 2 euros ($2.30) to help survivors.

“Pictures and video of the earthquake made them think of the wars and disasters they fled from,” Giovanni Maiolo, local coordinator of the SPRAR project (Protection System for Refugees and Asylum Seekers) told the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

The 6.2 magnitude quake struck a cluster of mountain communities 140 km (85 miles) east of Rome early on Wednesday as people slept, destroying hundreds of homes.

The death toll could rise further with rescue teams working for a second day to try to find survivors under the rubble of flattened towns.

In Arquata del Tronto, where the quake killed almost 50 people, Abdullai, an asylum seeker from Benin, has been helping with the clear-up work.

It was the first earthquake he experienced and realizing the devastating consequences, he decided to do something to help the survivors, Abdullai, who only gave his first name, said.

“At first I was very scared,” the 20-year-old told the Thomson Reuters Foundation by telephone. “Then I understood that they needed as much help as possible, and I want to do my part.”

He is part of a group of 17 asylum seekers who have spent the day weeding and cleaning an area designated to be an emergency operations center.

“I am a bit tired,” Abdullai said, who arrived in Italy a year ago after leaving Benin because of ethnic and religious discrimination.

“But helping these people makes me feel very strong too. This work is much more beautiful than a paid job, and I’ll come back as soon as possible,” he said.

Letizia Bellabarba, a coordinator of GUS, a charity that hosts asylum seekers, said they had come up with the idea themselves.

“They said that Italy welcomed and helped them, and it was now their turn to help Italians,” she said.

About 50 asylum seekers hosted by GUS in the area came forward, and they will be working in groups of 15 or 20 per day, coordinated by Italy’s Civil Protection Department.

Ten more refugee volunteers reached the devastated areas this morning from the southern province of Benevento, Paolo Di Donato, director of Centri Damasco, an organization that helps refugees, told the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

Centri Damasco has also offered to host 100 people displaced by the quake.

With a rescue effort that involves thousands of people and millions of euros, these gestures may seem a drop in the ocean, but their value goes beyond their tangible impact, Maiolo said.

“We hope that the kind of initiatives help fight stereotypes and misconceptions about refugees and migrants,” he said.

(Reporting by Pietro Lombardi, Editing by Astrid Zweynert. Please credit the Thomson Reuters Foundation, the charitable arm of Thomson Reuters, which covers humanitarian news, women’s rights, trafficking, property rights and climate change. Visit news.trust.org to see more stories)

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

A New Regime for the High Seas

2016-08-25-1472137343-2546921-TrevorScoutenWildscreenExchange.jpg©TrevorScouten/WildscreenExchange

Late last year, nearly 200 nations came together in Paris to reach a critical global climate agreement. The Paris climate agreement demonstrated that the international community can come together and successfully tackle a grave environmental problem of global scope.

It is now time for the international community to act on another grave global problem – the increasing degradation of the world’s oceans.

Most people don’t realize that managing almost two thirds of the globe’s oceans requires international cooperation. This area of international waters is known as the “high seas.” The high seas cover nearly half the surface of the planet and support fisheries and other resources of enormous importance to humanity.

This global commons is out of sight and out of mind, and we have collectively proven to be poor stewards of it. Declining fish stocks, rampant pollution, massive gyres of plastic waste, and species of whales and other sea life facing serious threats, are proof of our neglect.

Our dismal record of stewardship is in part due to the outdated international legal regime governing activities in oceans beyond our national borders. The high seas lack basic modern management tools the U.S. and other countries have deployed in our own waters for many decades. They include fully protected “marine parks,” where we allow ocean life to thrive, undisturbed by industrial fishing, mining and other industrial activity. And uniform rules on how to assess and manage human activities in the ocean to prevent significant damage. Tools like these can go far to making our beleaguered seas more resilient.

Next week, the United Nations will resume negotiating a new treaty aimed at overhauling the antiquated high seas legal regime. Key issues under discussion include the scope of the new treaty and the timing of negotiations. Some nations prefer the status quo, with few restrictions on activities in international waters. They will likely try to stall the process, or exempt key big industries like fishing.

We can’t let them succeed.

The climate agreement reached in Paris last December will start to bend the curve of a trajectory that was heading us toward climate disaster.

We can bend the curve heading toward disaster for our oceans as well. But we need collective international action to forge a strong agreement that requires large scale fully protected marine reserves, assessment and management of damaging human activities, and other modern management tools to address the increasing depletion, pollution and degradation of our ocean.

The oceans, and all of us, depend on the success of this endeavor. There isn’t a moment to lose.

This post is part of a series produced by The Huffington Post in partnership with Ocean Unite, an initiative to unite and activate powerful voices for ocean-conservation action. The series is being produced to coincide with the UN’s Preparatory Committee Meeting (Aug 26-Sept 9) on an internal legally binding instrument on marine biodiversity in areas beyond national jurisdiction and is a part of HuffPost’s “What’s Working” initiative, putting a spotlight on initiatives around the world that are solutions oriented. To read all the posts in the series, read here.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Trump Pitches to Blacks & Latinos, Alienates Them Instead

By, Siraj Hashmi

Donald Trump is in full desperation mode following his second major staff shake up of his campaign, according to many political insiders.

After being branded by Democrats and his political opponents as a “racist” and a “bigot”, Trump has pivoted his message in an attempt to attract black and Latino voters.

In Dimondale, Michigan last Friday, Trump made his first pitch by railing against Democratic policies emphasizing that things will only get worse under Hillary Clinton.

“Look at how much African American communities are suffering from Democratic control. To those I say the following: What do you have to lose by trying something new like Trump? What do you have to lose?” Trump asked the crowd. “You live in poverty, your schools are no good, you have no jobs, 58 percent of your youth is unemployed. What the hell do you have to lose?”

This new strategy comes in the wake of Trump hiring Stephen Bannon of Breitbart News to be his campaign’s chief executive and Kellyanne Conway as his new campaign manager to replace Paul Manafort, who resigned amid speculation of connections to a pro-Putin Ukrainian group.

Despite the new messaging, Trump’s support from blacks is hovering around eight percent among registered voters, according to an NBC News/SurveyMonkey poll. He’s performing worse with blacks than any other racial demographic. Clinton currently has 87 percent of the black vote, according to the same poll.

While the new tone may garner some new support, according to Eric Ham, author of “The GOP Civil War: Inside the Battle for the Soul of the Republican Party”, Trump needs all the help he can get from racial and ethnic minority voters because he’s seeing his support slip elsewhere.

“He’s losing every key electorate in this election at this moment,” Ham told GVH Live. “He’s doing very poorly among white, college educated voters. I think what he is thinking, along with his campaign team, is for every white voter we lose, we need to try to grab more of the minority vote.”

College educated white voters is the most contested demographic between Clinton and Trump. Clinton holds a slight edge over Trump, 47 to 46 percent.

In addition to a shift in campaign messaging to black voters, it appears Trump is also pivoting to attract Latino voters. During a town hall this week, Trump admitted to Sean Hannity that he’s willing to soften his stance on deporting all 11-12 million undocumented immigrants in the United States. This comes after a year of disparaging Latinos by calling Mexicans criminals and “rapists”.

“The way he’s actually talking about it now only increases the alienation that both African Americans and Latinos, I think will continue to exhibit during this campaign.” Ham explained.

With a little over two months left until the election, Trump finds himself in a bigger hole, trailing Clinton by 10 points, according to the most recent poll released by Quinnipiac University , 51 to 41 percent.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Samsung HW-K950 and HW-K850 sound bars rock Dolby Atmos

samsung-sb-1Samsung has unveiled a pair of new soundbars that are designed to bring big theater sound into your home. The sound bars include the HW-K950 and the HW-K850 and both of the soundbars feature Dolby Atmos technology inside. Samsung says that the HW-K950 is the world’s first 5.1.4 playback system with 15 speakers including upward-firing Dolby Atmos enabled speakers found … Continue reading

Curvy, retro arcade gaming cabinet is all ’70s class

8bitdo-sg-1Being a child of the ’80s, I spent plenty of time around the stuff that made it from the ’70s at friends and families homes. It seems to me that the hallmark of ’70s design was curved wood and plastic. A sweet retro gaming cabinet from 8bitdo looks exactly like it came from the ’70s only the graphics on the … Continue reading

'Don't Starve Together' arrives on PS4 with a huge bundle

Thanks to being a freebie for PlayStation Plus subscribers, Don’t Starve earned a solid following on PlayStation 4. To reward that, the developers at Klei Entertainment have put together a massive bundle headlined by the console version of the multip…

The Crazy Over-The-Top Milkshake Recipes You Totally Want

Some people think of milkshakes as an indulgent treat. And then there are those who think it it could be better, topping it with candy, ice cream sandwiches, whipped cream, more candy, doughnuts and brownies. Those folks are the geniuses behind such decadent places as NYC’s beloved Black Tap, London’s genius Molly Bakes (where they’re known as “freakshakes”) and Australia’s Pâtissez in Canberra. And those people have changed our expectations of milkshakes entirely.

If you don’t live near one of these epic dessert creators, don’t despair. You can make these treats in your own home. And we have the recipes to help you do just that. But first, a tutorial of sorts. This is how these beautiful, tremendous towers of sugar are created at Black Tap.

If you haven’t fallen into a sugar coma watching these mile-high shakes being built, you have passed the test. And you’re now ready to try your hand ― and test the limits of your stomach ― with one of these crazy, over-the-top milkshake recipes below.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.