2016 Mazda CX-9: What's the Big Deal?

2016-08-23-1471996076-944779-MazdaCX9.jpeg

The other day, a luxury SUV with about the same interior space as a Nissan Rogue but with a $50,000 price tag was delivered to our Atlanta offices. I don’t want to say the brand, because the vehicle I’m talking about is essentially a 10-year-old design and I know an all-new version is just around the corner – how that makes it worth $50k is beyond my understanding. By the way, new car shoppers: If you’re shopping for a new car, pay attention to the model cycle. If the car you’re looking at hasn’t received a serious update recently (i.e., it looks a LOT like a 2011 model), you might want to look elsewhere or ask for a nice discount. No one wants to buy a new ride only to have it look 5 years old the following month when the newer, sexier, better-equipped model lands at your local auto mall and on your cul-de-sac.

Anyway, back to the pricey SUV — as the driver pulled the car in, he parked right next to our 2016 Mazda CX-9, which we were all set to return. And that’s when it occurred to me just what a really great job Mazda has done with the new CX-9. Sitting next to a pricier but smaller luxury SUV, the Mazda had it easily outclassed by just simply being there. In the coming months, I believe we’ll start to see the 2016 Mazda CX-9 win awards, earn nearly universal praise and be featured on some hot reality show — something like “The Jerks of West LA” or “Coolest Stepmoms No One’s Ever Heard Of.” But what specifically is so great about this all-new SUV? Here are four things that make the new Mazda CX-9 so good.

Interior Feel
First, there’s the interior. This is a notch or two above other nonluxury SUVs like the Honda Pilot and Toyota Highlander. The textures are interesting, the knobs and switches feel precise, and there are nice touches, including real aluminum, maroon leather seating and real wood accents, in the Signature model. Overall, there’s a sense of intentional design and elegance that other family SUVs lack.

Exterior Styling
Next, the CX-9’s exterior look is above what you’d normally get with a family hauler. In terms of the exterior styling, both the Honda Pilot and the recently updated Nissan Pathfinder have a look that communicates an image somewhat higher than the kind of car little Logan and Skylar normally take their sweet time getting out of at carpool drop-off. But the Mazda CX-9 really takes the idea of a sexy family car to the next level — this is BMW level in terms of the overall exterior look.

Transmission
Every automaker should buy a CX-9, take it apart and figure out how they got the engine and transmission combination so right. The CX-9 accelerates with ease, and the 6-speed automatic transmission works almost imperceptibly. You don’t feel it shifting or searching for the right gear. Both the manual shift mode and sport mode work well and make the car more fun to drive.

Efficient Engine
The 2016 Mazda CX-9 has a 250-horsepower engine. That’s not so remarkable on its own — the 2017 Nissan Pathfinder is good for 284 hp, so the Mazda isn’t crushing the competition with brute strength. However, the CX-9’s power comes from a 2.5-liter, 4-cylinder engine that’s turbocharged (that’s a smaller engine than other three row SUVs). However, acceleration is excellent, and fuel economy is good, too: 25 miles per gallon in combined city and highway driving. The Environmental Protection Agency’s estimate for a front-wheel-drive 2016 Mazda CX-9 is 22 miles per gallon in the city and 28 mpg on the highway. That’s a huge improvement over the 2015 model’s estimated 17 mpg city/24 mpg hwy, and a little bit better than the Honda Pilot, the Nissan Pathfinder and the Toyota Highlander.

The updated 2016 Mazda CX-9 feels slightly smaller than some of its 3-row rivals, especially in the third row. Still, it’s such a remarkable vehicle that it will change what you expect from a $35,000 family SUV. The top-of-the-line Signature version tops $40,000, but it’s clearly worth a test drive.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

CIA Psychologists Sue CIA For Documents To Prove Torture Program Wasn't Their Idea

WASHINGTON ― The two CIA-contracted psychologists accused of crafting the spy agency’s so-called “enhanced interrogation program” filed a motion to compel the U.S. government to turn over documents they requested so they can defend themselves in a separate lawsuit brought forth by survivors of the torture program.

The motion, filed in the District Court for the District of Columbia on Monday, alleged that the CIA and Justice Department had been uncooperative in supplying James Elmer Mitchell and John “Bruce” Jessen with “documents critical to their defense.”

Their request is related to a separate ongoing lawsuit in Spokane, Washington, where the American Civil Liberties Union, on behalf of three former CIA detainees, is suing Jessen and Mitchell for their alleged role in creating and implementing an interrogation program that used techniques now considered to be torture.

The pair was hired by the CIA as contractors in 2002, as the agency was rounding up individuals suspected of having ties to al Qaeda and the Taliban and interrogating them in secret black sites around the world. Jessen and Mitchell’s company ultimately collected $81 million for their work.

The two psychologists have argued that they should have immunity from prosecution over the enhanced interrogation program because it was authorized by the executive branch during a time of war.

Mitchell and Jessen initially sought to have the lawsuit against them thrown out ― which is what has happened with past attempts to hold the CIA legally responsible for its torture program. But Senior Judge Justin L. Quackenbush of the Eastern District of Washington ruled in April that the case would continue and ordered both sides to begin discovery, the process of exchanging evidence before trial.

That’s where Mitchell and Jessen ran into problems.

According to the motion filed Monday, the subpoenas they submitted to the CIA and DOJ in June requested approximately 30 categories of documents. Back-and-forth correspondence between the government and lawyers for Mitchell and Jessen follows the same pattern, the motion alleged: “The Government claiming that it wants to provide Defendants with information, but is unsure how it can provide such information or when.”

The government has said that the psychologists’ request is overly vague and burdensome, ostensibly because of classification issues in documents related to the CIA’s now-defunct torture program.

In lieu of providing Mitchell and Jessen with the documents they have requested, the government has proposed “alternative and creative options,” the motion said. One option proposed by the CIA is to provide an anonymous witness who could answer questions in writing that could be used in court about the duo’s role in the torture program.

Lawyers representing Mitchell and Jessen rejected that option, “in part, because of the uncertain evidentiary value of such an affidavit and deposition,” the motion said. 

The court in Spokane, where the torture victims are suing Mitchell and Jessen, has set a discovery deadline of Feb. 17, 2017, although a list of expert witnesses and trial witnesses is due at the end of the year. The case is scheduled to go to trial next June.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Seeing New York City in Ridiculous 8K Is Pretty Sweet

Seeing New York City in Ridiculous 8K Is Pretty Sweet

I love New York City. I live here, so I’m biased. You might hate New York, and think it sucks, and think it’s dirty, and think people who live in New York talk about New York way too damn much. That’s fine. You’re actually more right than you know. But even you should be able to enjoy this fine video of New York City in glorious 8K. It’s every important landmark, building, bridge, cityscape, and thing you’ve seen a thousand times before in stupid TV shows and movies set in New York, painted with the most beautiful pixels I’ve ever seen.

Read more…

LSD Can Mess With the Language Centers in Your Brain

The stereotype of late 1960s authors and musicians is that certain drugs can help to expand the mind and make the user more creative. As someone who has never taken psychedelics, I can’t know this for sure, but a recent study seems to be the first step in displaying scientific evidence in support of that claim.

Read more…

18 Mediterranean Wedding Photos That'll Give You Major Wanderlust

The Greek islands and the French Riveria may be the most well-known and romantic places to tie the knot along the Mediterranean Sea ― but there are so, so many more beautiful seaside spots to say “I do.”

Check out 18 Mediterranean wedding pics below that will give you a serious case of wanderlust.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Teacher Gets Rid Of Homework, Gets A+ From Students And Parents

This teacher makes the grade.

Brandy Young, a second grade teacher in Texas, has decided to not assign her students any homework this year. She passed out a letter to announce her new homework policy during “Meet the Teacher Night” according to CBS News. And one parent, Samantha Gallagher, decided to post it on Facebook.

Since is was posted on August 16, it has received over 68,000 shares on Facebook alone.

Eat dinner as a family, read together, play outside and get your child to bed early.

The letters reads:

“Dear Parents,

After much research this summer, I am trying something new. Homework will only consist of work that your student did not finish during the school day. There will be no formally assigned homework this year.

Research has been unable to prove that homework improves student performance. Rather, I ask you spend your evenings doing things that are proven to correlate with student success. Eat dinner as a family, read together, play outside, and get your child to bed early.”

Comments on the post were pretty supportive. One parent expressed her frustration with her child’s workload, commenting that she helps her kid with “an hour of homework each night plus studying for tests and reading.”

A study published in The American Journal of Family Therapy, found students in early elementary school are getting three times the suggested amount of homework and that family stress increased as homework load increased.

“[Students] work hard all day. When they go home they have other things they need to learn there,” Young told CBS News. “I’m trying to develop their whole person; it’s not beneficial to go home and do pencil and paper work.”

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

GOP Lawmaker, Already Punished For Claiming Parents' Money As His Own, Does It Again

WASHINGTON ― Rep. Frank Guinta (R-N.H.) doesn’t seem to have learned his lesson when it comes to claiming his parents’ money as his own.

Guinta admitted in a 2015 Federal Election Commission document that he had accepted excessive contributions from his parents via a family fund during his 2010 campaign for Congress. He agreed to repay the money  ― which, despite the FEC conciliation agreement and a public apology at odds with the facts of the case, he still contends was his ― and he paid a $15,000 fine.

Now Guinta is going a step further. In his latest financial disclosure, obtained first by the Union Leader, Guinta is once again claiming the $355,000 he paid back, ostensibly to his parents, is actually his own asset.

“Rather than refunding the $355,000 in illegal excessive contributions Frank Guinta received from his parents back to his parents, he has instead kept the money himself,” Fergus Cullen, former chairman of the New Hampshire Republican Party, alleges in a letter to the FEC.

“It was plainly not the Commission’s intent for Guinta to keep the money personally or recycle the illegal excessive contribution he received from his parents back into his campaign committee a second time. Indeed, Guinta is thumbing his nose at the Commission,” Cullen wrote.

Cullen told The Huffington Post on Tuesday that he believes the FEC made a mistake in not specifying that Guinta had to repay his parents. “It says refund the money, but it doesn’t specify who the money needs to be refunded to,” Cullen said.

But Guinta’s campaign manager, Jay Ruais, told HuffPost that Guinta has done “exactly” what was required of him.

“To suggest anything else is simply inaccurate,” Ruais said. “The loan was refunded to the Guinta Family Fund on which he has been a signatory since 2010, along with his parents. Not a single thing has changed. Granite Staters recognize this, and no amount of politically charged complaints or opinions can change these facts.”

Ruais told HuffPost on Tuesday that Guinta had made documents available to reporters in 2010 showing that over the years, Guinta had contributed more than the $355,000 he drew from the account in 2010. Ruais declined to share those documents with HuffPost.

But this isn’t exactly a he-said, she-said situation. Guinta’s story is at odds with the FEC’s findings. A general counsel’s report notes that “substantial credible evidence” indicates the money was not Guinta’s, and despite all of the supposed evidence Guinta claims to have proving that he contributed significant amounts to the joint account, he accepted the FEC’s conciliation agreement stating that he took excessive contributions.

(The contribution limits for a couple are $5,400 for a primary contest and $5,400 for a general election.)

Moreover, when Guinta showed up to a meeting with the Union Leader in 2015 to prove that he had done nothing wrong, he produced documents showing that he maybe had contributed approximately $100,000 to the account, claiming that if one had invested that money in, say, an S&P 500 Index fund ― which isn’t to say that his parents did ― that money could have grown to more than $400,000.

Guinta also admitted during that meeting that his parents paid taxes on what he claims was his money.

Fuzzy math aside, Guinta hasn’t been reprimanded in any significant way for his actions. He paid the $15,000 fine to the FEC, repaid the $355,000 to the “Guinta Family Fund,” and was promoted to the Budget Committee less than a year later.

GOP leaders did nothing about Guinta’s transgressions. Reporters twice asked former Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) whether there would be any repercussions for Guinta ― Sen. Kelly Ayotte (R-N.H.) and state GOP Chairwoman Jennifer Horn both called on Guinta to resign last year ― and twice Boehner said he was still looking into the matter. Boehner resigned without ever ruling on the issue.

Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) has similarly been silent.

HuffPost has asked Ryan’s office for comment on Guinta multiple times. To this day, we’ve received nothing.

Ryan’s chief communications adviser, Brendan Buck, did not respond to repeated requests for comment Tuesday on whether Guinta’s latest conduct was the sort of behavior the speaker expects from his members, and earlier this year, Ryan’s office would not comment on whether it was appropriate for Guinta to literally run away from reporters. (Guinta fled when HuffPost began asking him questions regarding the money.)

Cullen has an additional complaint with the FEC, claiming that Guinta, in effect, paid himself twice for a portion of the $355,000. Before Guinta reached his agreement with the FEC, his campaign paid him $81,500 as a loan repayment (back when Guinta was claiming ― as he is now, technically ― that the money was his).

His campaign canceled his remaining debt and reclassified the entire $355,000 as a new debt to the “Guinta Family Fund.” 

By not reimbursing his campaign, Cullen alleges, “Guinta has illegally received and retained $81,500 in contributions to his campaign for his personal use.”

“In effect, he paid himself this amount twice,” Cullen continued.

Cullen also claimed on Tuesday that Guinta may have violated elections laws by mixing primary campaign and general election funds to repay his debt, and that there was now a potential tax investigation related to the $81,500. 

“He’s never released his taxes either,” Cullen added.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Letting Go Of The Familiar

2016-08-22-1471903296-174217-shutterstock_281846066.jpg

It was 11 pm, and as I was tidying up before going to bed, I decided to let the dog out the front door rather than letting him take his evening pee in the backyard. As I was setting the dishwasher, I could hear him barking frantically in the side yard. I grabbed a flashlight and went to investigate. As I shined the light into the side yard, I could see Benny, my 22 lb dachshund mix up the hill trying to climb the tree and as I swung my light up there were two eyes surrounded by a black furred mask staring back at me. The raccoon brought its attention back to the dog, hissing and spitting at him. Even though I live on the fringes of a rural area, I am still a city girl at heart. Spitting raccoons are not my forte.

Usually, I would have wakened my husband to have him battle the wilderness. But this time, there is no husband. My husband was transitioning into a woman, and nothing in my world was familiar. My ordinary life was no longer. I could have gotten my partner up and out of bed, and she totally would have dealt with the situation at hand but instead I broke through the protective bubble that I as a wife, as a woman, had always placed myself. I’m going to do this I thought. I pulled on some sweatpants and laced up my sneakers, with the flashlight in one hand, and a right size stick in the other, I climbed the hill towards the ruckus. I kept chanting the raccoon is more afraid of you than you are of it, bullshit, the raccoon is more scared of you than you are of it, bullshit, the raccoon is more afraid of you.. you get the idea. With one lunge I scooped up Benny, turned and slid down the hill on my rear with a squirming dog in my lap. When I hit the bottom of the hill, I leaped up and ran for our lives into the house. I set the dog down, and I sat on the floor next to him as I let my heart rate get back to its normal rhythm.

This story seems like a little thing, cute even, but it was a big moment for me. I broke through the familiar into the unfamiliar. I did something very unfamiliar to me. I stepped forward rather than step back. I stepped forward into the darkness, climbed the hill to get the dog, and slid back down to safety and got back up on my feet.

In the weeks and months that followed, I had many moments when I had to break through the familiar into the unfamiliar. My familiar and comfortable place in our marriage were that I let my husband, the man of the house take care of traditional male roles. I was conditioned that way. Now it was changing. I grew into my new place. I figured out how to fix a leaky toilet by watching Youtube and asking questions at Home Depot. I carried the yearly load of firewood that gets delivered and dumped on the driveway to the rear of our house. I started making sure the oil was changed regularly in all the cars. All things I was capable of doing before, it just wasn’t familiar to me. I’ve learned that I could step forward and do these things, rather than step back and let my husband do it. Today I don’t have a husband; I have a partner, and we are in this together.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Tesla’s biggest challenge is batteries, and there’s no easy fix

tesla-powerwallSuddenly, battery chemistry is the most interesting – and arguably most frustrating – topic in technology. Tesla’s announcement today of a new, larger battery pack which will make its debut in even-faster versions of the Model S and Model X may sound like just another spec bump as the automaker looks to further eclipse gas engines, but according to CEO … Continue reading

Exhibitions with Artistic (and Political) Punch

I stopped by Bergamot Station last week to check out a few exhibitions at various galleries and spent –to my surprise– more time there than I had initially intended. So let me take you on a short tour…

2016-08-23-1471980826-6163928-HP_1_MartinKrammer.jpg

At bG Gallery, I found an exhibition of sculptures by Austrian artist Martin Krammer — his first exhibition in the U.S. Inspired by early 20th century photographic portraits, Krammer carves his figurative sculptures out of wood, with their flattened surfaces enhanced by black watercolor paint.

2016-08-23-1471991481-1451378-HP_2_Composite_MartinKrammer.jpg

The exhibition’s press release quotes Krammer, saying that “[his] intention is to connect with the characters and melt the pose and the moment of the photo into a new object, a free standing bas- relief which is nearly as flat as the picture…”. I found myself walking around these roughly carved sculptures that leave the strange but appealing impression that after making his “realistic” full-body portraits, the artist somehow pressed and flattened them into 2 dimensions, thus enhancing their resemblance to the original photographic portraits. The exhibition runs through August 30th.

2016-08-23-1471980879-8301248-HP_3_Composite_RoseGallery.jpg

ROSEGALLERY has an unusual exhibition, “Collectors’ Favorites”, which is comprised of over 70 photographs culled from private collections of members of The Photographic Arts Council – Los Angeles. This exhibition offers not only a rare chance to see works by such masters as Robert Frank, Irving Penn, Imogen Cunningham, and Edward Weston but it also provides insights into the intriguing, and sometimes peculiar, preferences and choices made by these private collectors.

2016-08-23-1471980899-5658394-HP_4_Composite_RoseGallery2.jpg

The exhibition is closing on September 3rd, but this coming Saturday, August 27th ROSEGALLERY will host a conversation between these L.A. photography collectors and Virginia Heckert, curator at the Getty Museum. This event is scheduled to start at 11:30am and is open to the public.

2016-08-23-1471980899-5658394-HP_4_Composite_RoseGallery2.jpg

Now I want to invite you to the Robert Berman Gallery to see the exhibition “Save America” which will throw you into the very center of the political drama and circus of our presidential election. Starting with the Warhol’s 1972 demonic portrait of Nixon bearing the slogan “Vote McGovern”, the exhibition proceeds with a series of political portraits all appropriated from Warhol, among them a portrait of George W. Bush with a handwritten note, “Vote Obama”.

2016-08-23-1471980947-5694918-HP_6_Composite_NixonTrump.jpg

And the most sizzling of them all is a smiling but scary face of Donald Trump with a particularly poignant written message underneath: “Vote Bernie”, but with Bernie’s name crudely scratched out and replaced with Hillary. All of these appropriated works are created by RJ Berman, and if you do a little research, you will be appropriately amused to learn that the full name of this daring artist is Robert Berman, the very art dealer and owner of this gallery.

So ladies and gentlemen, if you’re still uncertain as to whom you’ll vote for in this upcoming election, come see this exhibition before it closes this Saturday, August 27th. It will definitely help you make the right choice.

To learn about Edward’s Fine Art of Art Collecting Classes, please visit his website. You can also read The New York Times article about his classes here, or an Artillery Magazine article about Edward and his classes here.

___________

Edward Goldman is an art critic and the host of Art Talk, a program on art and culture for NPR affiliate KCRW 89.9 FM. To listen to the complete show and hear Edward’s charming Russian accent, click here.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.