Fancy building your own portable coffee maker?

fuse-coffeeCoffee can be said to be the perfect pick-me-up drink that most people need to start their day right. Not only that, there are many ways to get your caffeine fix — ranging from sachets that are packaged in a factory somewhere, or going through the motions of using an expensive coffee machine in your home to brew the perfect cuppa. What if we told you that it is possible to construct your very own coffee maker? This is what this modular coffee maker is all about, letting you obtain a latte from whole beans in a matter of minutes.

Bangkok-based FUSE Coffee Company intends to roll out their coffee-gadget FUSE Modular Coffee Press system. Touted to be a portable coffee maker, the FUSE Coffee Press will rely on a bunch of twist-on modules which at this point in time, includes a ceramic burr that will help to grind roasted beans right before the brew, as well as a milk frother for those who would prefer to settle for a latte or cappuccino.

After all, there is nothing quite like grinding fresh beans on the spot and brewing it right away in order to obtain the perfect cup of coffee, and this fully robust, easy to clean, portable and modular system is able to offer users such a luxury as users grind, brew and froth milk while they are on the move.

This FUSE portable system, as mentioned earlier, is fully modular. At the core of the system lies a 1-lb (450-g), 4.8 x 3.1-in (122 x 80-mm) chamber and plunger. This particular hand-held plunger will press down hot water into a stainless steel coffee chamber at 5 to 6 bar (73 to 87 psi) of pressure, so that coffee is able to escape into a cup. If you would like to have your cuppa to taste a wee bit stronger, do take note that this is fully adjustable with a twist of the chamber.

The main unit can be pre-ordered at $49 a pop, where it is hoped to ship out before this Christmas arrives.

Press Release
[ Fancy building your own portable coffee maker? copyright by Coolest Gadgets ]

Stockholm's Rainbow Flags Fly With Conviction

2016-08-03-1470251483-3439198-IMG_2777.jpg

We’re in the midst of Pride season: a summer of marches and parades and festivals around the globe in celebration of LGBT pride and the pursuit of equality. From the Empire State Building and the World Trade Center in New York to the Eiffel Tower in Paris, municipal buildings around the world are illuminated in the colors of the rainbow flag–and yet few cities fly the rainbow flag with as much conviction as Stockholm.

Throughout Sweden‘s largest city, rainbow flags wave proudly in front of the Royal Palace and the Royal Opera House, as well as the Royal Dramatic Theatre and Stockholm Concert Hall, home to the Royal Stockholm Philharmonic.

2016-08-03-1470251376-9982794-IMG_2874.jpg

On Strandvägen, one of Sweden’s most posh waterfront promenades, Hotel Diplomat hangs a full-size rainbow flag alongside the national flags of both Sweden and Britain. Consider, for a moment, the symbolism: gay people every bit as equal as citizens of Britain and Sweden.

In 2014, the Swedish government announced its ambition to make Sweden the world’s leading nation in the pursuit of LGBT equality. As stated by Erik Ullenhag, then Minister of Integration, “For Sweden to be able to speak with credibility and influence the situation for LGBT people around the world, we must put right our own house. We must prove that in this country, we are serious that LGBT rights are human rights.”

2016-08-03-1470251613-1377264-IMG_6993.jpg

Historically, Sweden has been at the vanguard of LGBT equality. Same-sex relations were legalized in 1944, which was followed in 1976 by the integration of the Swedish military, which enabled all LGBT people to serve without being closeted. In 1979, Sweden became the first country in the world to declassify homosexuality as a medical disorder. Same-sex marriage has been legal since 2009.

During Stockholm Pride 2015, the Swedish government appointed a special task force to strengthen the work of LGBT rights in the world, with a focus on the skills levels of the State Department and embassies. As stated by Alice Bah Kuhnke, Minister for Culture and Democracy, and Isabella Lövin, Minister for Development Cooperation, “We want to ensure that Sweden is a model that takes a leading global role for LGBT rights.”

2016-08-03-1470251687-7707891-IMG_2771.jpg

Unofficially known as Sweden’s LGBT minister, Kuhnke, alongside four other Swedish government ministers, is spearheading legislation to strengthen the rights of LGBT people to be themselves in all areas of life. In their words, “The Government is therefore planning to implement changes that aim to offer the same conditions for everyone, regardless of the choice of partner and type of family that each of us chooses to live with.”

“Two hours of happiness and love,” was Swedish Prime Minister Stefan Lofven’s assessment of this year’s Stockholm Pride parade, the largest in Scandinavia. Lofven marched with more than 60,000 participants and nearly a million cheering spectators along a 2.6-mile route that ended in Pride Park where entertainers such as Ruby Rose, star of Orange Is the New Black, kept the crowds dancing long after sunset.

2016-08-03-1470251743-3567602-IMG_2440.jpg

Putting their money behind their principles, the Swedish government has budgeted over SEK 6 million (nearly $1 million) for education initiatives aimed at increasing knowledge of LGBT issues in the public sector. A six-prong strategy for equal rights aims to improve the lives of LGBT people with a focus on health and social services; violence and other violations; LGBT youth; family life; culture; and a civil society.

The municipality of Stockholm has allocated SEK 8 million (nearly $1 million) to initiate an LGBT education program in the city schools, commencing with elementary school. The goal will be to create a safer environment for LGBT students, particularly those exposed to violence, with a focus on staff training and school activities.

2016-08-03-1470251790-9389143-IMG_6763.jpg

As the Swedish government asserted in 2014, “Every effort we have made to strengthen LGBT rights has been preceded by long and lively discussions. Sometimes it sounded like the world was going to fall apart. But that has not happened; the world has not broken up because we said yes to love and equality of all people.”

In other words, those rainbow flags flying all over Stockholm and Sweden are a testament to the love of LGBT people in a country notable for its pursuit of equality.

2016-08-03-1470251853-3388505-L1090030.jpg

For more information about Sweden’s rainbow pride, visit Stockholm Pride, as well as Visit Stockholm and Visit Sweden.

(All images courtesy of MRNY)

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

The Full Monty Comes To Provincetown, And It's About Time

If you haven’t seen The Full Monty in Provincetown, Massachusetts, then you really haven’t seen The Full Monty.

The four-year-old Peregrine Theatre Ensemble, based in Provincetown, has mounted, no pun intended, the stage version of the beloved movie, and offers a highly enjoyable, lighthearted production that’s sure to please.

The musical, with book by Terrence McNally and music and lyrics by David Yezbek, ran for 770 performances on Broadway and garnered no less than ten Tony nominations.

The Full Monty in Provincetown is part of the Peregrine Theatre’s exploration of celebrity; if anything, the play shows that anyone can have his or her fifteen minutes of fame if that person is willing to work hard enough (and take off all his clothes).

If you haven’t seen the movie, stop reading this review and go download it. It’s an absolute delight, depicting six men — five workers and one manager — laid off from a factory in Sheffield, England, unable to get another job, and who make their money and reclaim their manhood by stripping for a night.

The Full Monty is a euphemism for full-frontal male nudity, which is achieved in the Provincetown version by — spoiler alert — you better look fast if you want to see anything.

Beau Jackett does a terrific job as Jerry Wachowski, an unemployed factory worker in Buffalo, to which the stage version has been transplanted. He sings, he dances, he takes off his clothes.

Terrence Brady is completely convincing as his best friend, Dave Bukatinsky, who would rather make love to a chocolate bar than his gorgeous wife, played delightfully by Jacqueline Smook.

Director and choreographer Terry Norgeot does a wonderful job keeping the show moving — it’s a long evening in the theater, but it goes by like a shot.

Musical director Sue Keller gets the most out of her singers. “Big Black Man” and “Michael Jordan Ball” rock the house.

The point of the movie, and the play, is that a man who doesn’t work isn’t a man. And reclaiming one’s manhood becomes the obsession of these men, unemployed against their will.

Their wives and girlfriends attend a Chippendale’s type strip show, which gives Jerry the idea of stripping and making enough money to pay child support so that he can maintain his relationship with his young son, touchingly played by Quinn Schuyler.

Special mention goes to Reggie Whitehead, who in the role of Noah “Horse” Simmons, all but steals the show with his arthritic gyrations and powerhouse singing.

Special mention also goes to the Fiore Joseph Barbini, for his portrayal of the stripper-with-a-heart-and-thong-of gold, Keno.

If you want to see more, you’ll have to go see it for yourself. On August 18th, the cast puts its clothes on for good, so you’ve got until then if you want to see these six fellows bare all.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

PowerCurve Surge Protector helps to protect your devices

powercurveDon’t you love all of the electronic devices that you have at home? Well, you will obviously need to ensure that they are well protected as well, taking into consideration the rather huge sum of money that you have already invested in them. This kind of protection can arrive in the form of a surge protector, as you can never quite tell as to when your home’s electric circuit will experience an overload or unstable power distribution. Enter the PowerCurve Surge Protector which will arrive in 5-outlet + USB, 6 outlet or mini form factors with prices that range from $17.99 to $29.99.

Sporting up to half a dozen rotating outlets at best, the PowerCurve Surge Protector will allow you to turn each of the outlets in such a manner where you need not waste a single one of them in the event where there is an awkwardly sized power adapter. The 4 ft. long power cord on the 5-Outlet + USB or 6-Outlet models would also mean they are long enough to have all those options exactly where you need them. As for the PowerCurve Mini, the name suggests that it is tiny enough to be packed into a suitcase for travels, and all of them offer up to 2160 Joules of protection for added peace of mind.
[ PowerCurve Surge Protector helps to protect your devices copyright by Coolest Gadgets ]

I'm A Christian Feminist, Because Jesus Loves Women And We Should, Too

This post originally appeared on Bustle.

By Char Adams

I’ve been a Christian for as long as I can remember — and, even though I may not have realized it at the time, I’ve been a feminist for just as long. Growing up, I was never spoon-fed scriptures about my status and supposed purpose as a woman. But my “role” as a girl was made clear to me by the way my sisters, brothers and I were treated. Each day, my sisters and I cooked, cleaned and cared for our younger sibling, while the boys’ tasks were simple: take out the trash and/or sweep the hallway (which they rarely did). I was often made to feel guilty if I did not do these things, and it was ingrained in my mind that if I didn’t do them, they would not get done and I would be selfish for not doing them. For a reason I didn’t understand at the time, I was never comfortable with this. Now I realize that it is because I am a feminist — and I was then, too.

In fact, I remember the moment I became a feminist — a person who, as Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie so accurately put it, believes in the social, political and economic equality of the sexes. Throughout my childhood, my older sister and I always shared a bedroom while my brothers almost always had their own. One day, in my early teen years, I asked my mother why my brothers had their own bedrooms and my sister and I always had to share. She looked agitated and replied, “because they’re boys. You know how that goes.”

But I didn’t know “how that goes.” I didn’t understand why my being born a girl automatically confined me to a smaller living space. I soon began to notice all the things my being born a girl confined me to. And I knew it wasn’t right.

When I began to fully embrace my Christian faith in my late teens and early 20s, I found a deeply fulfilling love, joy and peace in it. It was a secure foundation on which I could build my morality, identity and life. However, as I sat in numerous churches, I couldn’t ignore the slight pang of offense I felt in my heart when preachers encouraged women in the congregation to be “quiet” and “submissive,” to not pursue careers as pastors and to instead learn to be a “good wife.” I shook my head in disgust when Christian men would tell me that children and marriage should be of prime importance in my life and that I was made to “help” my “future husband” achieve the purpose God has for his life — as though God did not have one for me, too. They would tack on “because that’s God’s will” at the end of these oppressive, sexist statements — as if the addition made their comments okay.

It seems that when it comes to patriarchy and the scriptures that appear to promote it, we Christians have failed to study the verses in-depth. We have failed to uncover the true meaning and intent, and instead take them at face value. We as a society have done and continue to do this for one reason: patriarchy suits us. It is a foundational component of our society — of our society, I will stress, but not God’s original will for humanity as reflected in scripture.

My beliefs as a feminist were initially shaped by all of the injustices and instances of oppression that I experienced growing up. As I young girl (and a young feminist) I would read scriptures that appeared sexist and I knew that I had to be missing something. Jesus couldn’t be sexist, could he? Of course not. Many of the scriptures that appear to promote patriarchy are simply a reflection of the cultural attitudes of the time in which they were written. Not the actual teachings of Jesus or God’s will.

It breaks my heart that people have reduced the love Jesus has for me to a set of sexist roles and gender expectations that are more a result of socialization than God’s written word in the Bible. I am angry. With that, here are my beliefs as a Christian feminist.

1. Jesus Is My Favorite Feminist

2016-07-29-1469811769-3800652-1.gif

Yes, the Christ himself. Jesus had a countercultural attitude toward women. At a time when women were uneducated, looked down on and viewed as property, Jesus spoke with the Samaritan woman at the well (John 4), he defended a woman caught in adultery (John 8:1-11) and he healed the woman who’s illness caused her to bleed constantly, instead of shunning her (Mark 5:25-34) — which many would have done at that time.

As Christians, we are called to strive to be like Jesus — so if Christ boldly treated all women like human beings worthy of respect and consideration, we should too. Sexism and patriarchy are deeply rooted in all areas of modern society, so, as Christians, we are to follow Christ’s lead by being different, and that includes treating women as equals in every way.

After all, scripture says in Acts 10 that “God is no respecter of persons” and accepts all of his followers without condition — so, he treats and loves us all equally regardless of our gender.

In her book Jesus Feminist, Sarah Bessey puts it plainly (and boldly): “Patriarchy is not God’s dream for humanity. It never was; it never will be. Instead, in Christ, and because of Christ, we are invited to participate in the Kingdom of God through redemptive movement — for both men and women — toward equality and freedom.”

If we studied the New Testament scriptures that seem to encourage patriarchy and perpetuate the idea of women’s inferiority, we would see that they are a reflection of the Greco-Roman patriarchal household codes. The sexism and status of women during that time period have no place in modern society.

2. One-Way Submission Isn’t Romantic

2016-07-29-1469811838-546048-2.gif

I’ve gotten into my fair share of debates about the controversial scriptures encouraging women to “submit” to their husbands (Colossians 3:18) and “learn in quietness and full submission” (1 Timothy 2:11).

I’ve had many Christian men mansplain “Godly submission” to me and romanticize it, as though submission were some badge of honor. And it may be for some –that’s totally fine. But usually, when I ask these men if they would submit to their wives in any situation, I receive looks of disgust and sharp objections. So, it seems submission is only an “honor” when applied to women. (Obviously, not all women are married, so speaking to a single woman as though she is married, or as though marriage should be her primary focus, is a direct result of patriarchy, too).

The reason one-way submission is unjust (and hypocritical) is simple. Luke 6:31 says “Do to others as you would have them do to you.” If you find yourself meeting the idea of submission with disdain, then don’t inflict it on someone else.

The Amplified Bible translation expands on the “submission” scriptures: “Wives, be subject to your husbands [subordinate and adapt yourselves to them] as is right and fitting and your proper duty to the Lord.”

That doesn’t sound too romantic or loving to me.

I believe that scripture teaches mutual submission in marriage — that a marriage should be a union of love, equality and fairness. When God first introduces women, in Genesis, we are called “ezer kenegdo.” The Hebrew phrase has long been translated as “helpmeet” — however, theologian and Biblical scholar Victor P. Hamilton explains in his book, The Book of Genesis, that the Hebrew “ezer kenegdo” means “helper suitable.” (Hamilton even notes that the word is masculine in gender and is often used in scripture to describe God as a “helper”).

Hamilton writes: “[Kenegdo] suggests that what God creates for Adam will correspond to him. Thus the new creation will be neither a superior nor an inferior, but an equal. “

3. That’s Not Scripture, That’s Socialization

As I navigate the world as a modern-day woman, I can’t help but notice the many sexist practices we have wrongly attributed to God’s word. For example, I was on a date a few months ago and, as usual, I insisted on paying for my own meal. This infuriated my date, a Christian man, and he proceeded to tell me how it was his “job” as “the man” to “provide” for me during our date.

I asked him if he could show me a scripture in the Bible that said “Men, pay for your date’s meal because you’re the man and it’s your job to provide.” Of course, he could not. (Actually, the Bible says in Proverbs 31 that a “virtuous woman” “provides food for her family,” but I’ll sip my tea.)

Christianity, at its core, is receiving the love God has for us and working to spread that love to the world, thus bringing God glory. That should be our goal as Christians. It breaks my heart that we have let the injustice of patriarchy hinder us from loving people equally. Patriarchy says that we are to expect certain characteristics and actions from a person based on their sex. This way of thinking strips people of their individuality and the harmful expectations we assign to people only lead to hardened hearts when people fail to meet those expectations. We can’t love with hardened hearts.

4. I Don’t Want Children, and God Is Okay With That

When I tell my Christian friends (or anyone else, for that matter) that I don’t want children, I usually get responses like “Oh, you’ll change your mind,” “You don’t mean that,” or, my personal favorite, “I rebuke that in the name of Jesus.” We’ll disregard how rude and dismissive all of those statements are. But I will say, my goal in life is to honor God and fulfill the destiny He has for my life, and there’s a possibility that my destiny does not include children.

I simply do not have the desire to birth or raise children. In biblical times, children brought honor to a woman, and a woman who could not have children was shunned and looked down on. Thank God we live in different times now — for the most part.

Psalm 37:4 says that if we “delight” ourselves in the Lord, He will give us the desires of our heart. My delight is in the Lord, and he knows what I want out of life, and he surely knows that motherhood is not a desire of mine. Surely a good God, like the one we Christians serve, would not give me something I do not want.

We as Christians, and as a society, seem to define womanhood by choosing or not choosing motherhood. I am much more than that — God says so.

5. Feminism is For Everyone — Even Christians

2016-07-29-1469812345-2619526-giphy1.gif

If we would be honest with ourselves, we Christians would admit that fundamental Christianity has fueled the fire of many injustices throughout the centuries. The twisting and perversion of God’s word has led to the slaughter of thousands, upheld the institution of slavery for years and secured for patriarchy and sexism a place in society.

As Bessey wrote, patriarchy is not God’s dream for humanity. The thousands of women and girls trafficked each year, the number of women and children who die each year at the hand of a violent lover or parent, the number of women working to get ahead in a sexist society — God cares about and loves all of these women. And we should, too.

History has proven that patriarchy has long been a tool of oppression. And the worst thing patriarchy does for Christianity is trick our Deborahs (Judges 5) into believing they are Jezebels (1 &2 Kings).

Rejecting patriarchy will be great for men, too. Without the harmful expectations placed on men to be emotionless, sole providers and strong 150 percent of the time, men will be free to be themselves and to be who God called them to be.

In my eyes, Christians should be on the front lines of the feminist movement, because God is a God of justice who loves us all equally — and we should aim to perfect those traits within the church, and within ourselves.

Images: Moya Omololu, Giphy

More from Bustle:
I Am A Plus Size Woman Who Wore A Low-Rise Bikini & Here’s What Happened
31 Photos Of Plus Size Women Rocking Bikinis
5 Reasons Why I Use The Term Plus Size As A Descriptor

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Why Isn't Pokemon Go in South Korea Yet? Gaming, Cyber Security, and the Role of the State

Pokémon GO

By Michael Buckalew

Since its release on July 6th in the United States, and on July 13th and 14th in Australia and the European Union, Pokemon Go has dominated the Internet and garnered significant coverage in mainstream news. However, in South Korea Pokemon Go has yet to be released, awaiting a decision from the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (MOLIT) sometime in August regarding access to digital mapping data. The country is the world’s 4th largest gaming market and well-known for its intense gaming culture, most prominently in games such as Dota, League of Legends, and Starcraft II. The issues holding up Pokemon Go’s release are rooted in antiquated national security laws and the perceived threat posed by North Korea. It may take some time, but eventually Pokemon Go will be released in South Korea.

There have been growing restrictions in access to some websites and applications on the basis of South Korea’s National Security Law. An example of this is the blocking of British-based website, northkoreatech.org, which discusses the use of digital technology in North Korea. Other instances include the prosecution of a South Korean activist for retweeting edited propaganda photos from North Korea, and the banning of iJuche, an app in the iTunes store which delivers articles from the North Korean Central News Agency. These situations highlight a growing tension between national security and the ideals of an open and free internet.

As an augmented reality platform, where 3D models or videos are projected onto real images seen through digital devices, Pokemon Go depends on Google Maps for its functionality. With innovations in smartphones and WiFi, such augmented reality games are increasingly accessible around the world. But what does that have to do with cyber security and North Korea?

Following the Korean War, South Korea put into place restrictions intended to prevent sensitive map data, such as that of military and government facility locations, from falling into North Korean hands. Google has been petitioning South Korea’s MOLIT since 2008 for a license to export government-supplied map data for use in driving, public transportation, and other map applications. Yet, opinion within the South Korean government is split, with the Ministry of National Defense, National Intelligence Service, and National Geographic Institute opposing Google on national security grounds. This leaves South Korean President Park Geun-Hye’s administration awkwardly trying to balance national security concerns with the promotion of a more “creative economy” in which Pokemon Go and other map-based applications are readily accessible.

The debate may already be moot, however. First, despite the mapping restrictions, Pokemon Go is currently available in the South Korean city of Sokcho, on the east coast of South Korea near the Demilitarized Zone. It is now also possible to access the game in Busan, in the southeast corner of the Korean peninsula, following Pokemon Go’s release in Japan, since the diamond-shaped map grid overlaps with Tsushima, a Japanese island near the coast of South Korea. It’s currently estimated that about 410,000 South Koreans have already downloaded Pokemon Go, with that number growing daily. This further demonstrates the futility of a 20th century national security law in managing 21st century issues.

Even if Google accepted the South Korean government’s restrictions on mapping, such a policy would not necessarily keep such information from North Korea. High-resolution maps of South Korean military installations and other sensitive government buildings can already be found using Google Earth and other applications outside of South Korea. The Park administration would better promote South Korean national security interests by focusing its energy on cybersecurity.

South Korea’s Pokemon fan base languishes without access to the popular new game. As Pokemon Go is already accessible in one region, soon to be two, the restrictions placed on the service will prove to be pointless and only frustrate consumers. The game is going to be released in the whole of South Korea sooner or later. It’s a question of when and not if. But one can only hope that the South Korean government takes this opportunity to update security laws to effectively protect the nation in the 21st century, while not standing in the way of domestic consumers.

Michael Buckalew received an MA in International Studies from Korea University in Seoul, South Korea and a BA in History and Political Science from Arcadia University. He is a Fellowship Editor at Young Professionals in Foreign Policy (YPFP).

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Trump Asks Security Expert, 'If We Have Nukes, Why Can't We Just Use 'Em?'

Morning Joe host Joe Scarborough this morning revealed that Donald Trump asked a foreign policy expert three times, “If we have nuclear weapons, why can’t we use them?”

The revelation about Trump stunned the members of the panel. Co-host Mika Brzezinski warned viewers, “Be careful America. And be careful Republican leaders. Your party is blowing up.”

The comments followed an interview with an interview with former Director of Central Intelligence and ex-National Security Agency Director Michael Hayden, who discussed Trump’s erratic, inconsistent , unpredictable style. “Those are dangerous things,” said Hayden. “They frighten your friends and they tempt your enemies.”

It was also revealed that Trump has no international level foreign policy advisers. The fear is if Trump is somehow elected, he will be woefully unprepared for the task at hand, putting all of us in danger.

“SEVERAL MONTHS AGO, A FOREIGN POLICY EXPERT ON THE INTERNATIONAL LEVEL WENT TO ADVISE DONALD TRUMP. AND THREE TIMES HE ASKED ABOUT THE USE OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS. THREE TIMES HE ASKED AT ONE POINT IF WE HAD THEM WHY CAN’T WE USE THEM,” SAID SCARBOROUGH.

WATCH THE ASTONISHING VIDEO, BELOW.

These chilling disclosures follow an earlier embarrassing gaffe when Trump flailed around for an answer when asked about another nuclear weapons issue in a December 2015 debate.

Trump was stumped when asked what the “Nuclear Triad” was. The average voter may not know, but the average presidential candidate should.

One would expect that someone who thought they were qualified to be commander in chief of the greatest military the world has ever known would know the nuclear triad consists of strategic bombers, intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs), and submarine-launched ballistic missiles. That’s what’s on the other end of The Button.

Perhaps the best way to demonstrate the effect of a nuclear weapon would be to show a real estate developer what real estate looks like after a nuclear strike.

2016-08-04-1470276654-6757788-Hiroshima_Dome_1945.gif

Unless Donald Trump gets real smart real soon, his campaign may soon look like this:

2016-08-04-1470276727-3203172-2048pxNagasakibomb.jpg

No matter what one thinks of Hillary Clinton, there is no reason to believe she would not know the answer to these questions.

2016-08-04-1470276787-5823041-Trinity_shot_color.jpg

Photo credits

Cover Photo Trinity Shot, Manhattan Project via Wikimedia Commons

Hiroshima Dome 1945 By Shigeo Hayashi via Wikimedia Commons

Nagasaki bomb from B-29 Superfortress via Wikimedia Commons

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Why Gun Control and Anti-Muslim Rhetoric Is the New Frontier of America's Culture War

Vigil to unite in the wake of the Orlando Pulse shooting

By Tania F. Cohen

After the June mass shooting at an Orlando gay nightclub, familiar arguments about gun control and terrorism reemerged in news cycles and political debates. Upon learning that the shooter was Muslim and had stated his support for the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIL), Republican leaders framed the shooting as another failure by President Obama to maintain U.S. national security against Islamic terrorism. Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump reiterated versions of his proposal to ban all Muslims from entering the United States, although he and his surrogates have been inconsistent in describing the policy’s specifics, and at times have attempted to back away from it altogether. Instead of stoking anti-Muslim sentiments, U.S. leaders should acknowledge that terrorism is not just incompatible with Western values, but with Muslim values as well, and that Muslims, who comprise approximately 23% of the world’s population, are important members of the global, Western, and American societies.

Despite the legitimate concerns raised by both Democrats and Republications about gun control and national security, the discourse that has emerged since Orlando is indicative of more than just another argument in the partisan gun control debate; it signals a new culture war. Michael Lind argues in Politico Magazine that, “the decades-long ‘culture war’ between religious conservatives and secular liberals is largely over” and that “social issues spurred a partisan realignment by changing who considered themselves Democrats and Republicans.” Now, he posits, the parties are divided by their worldviews: populist nationalists and multicultural globalists. Lind characterizes nationalists as people who emphasize the divide between American citizens and “everyone else” above all. He is careful not to conflate this “populist” nationalism with racist “white” nationalism or nativism, but notes that nationalism on the right is currently “tainted by strains of white racial and religious nationalism and nativism,” for which Donald Trump is the central figure and his wall on the U.S.-Mexico border is the symbol. In contrast, Lind defines globalists as people who value “subnational (race, gender, orientation) and supranational (citizenship of the world)” identities above all else and view American policies through these lenses. Today, attitudes toward minority groups, specifically Muslims, resulting from fears of terrorism and violent extremism form the major battleground in this chasm between these worldviews. Their application in the discourse surrounding gun violence exemplifies the divide.

Discussions about gun violence consistently focus on either mental health issues or gun control policies – and, when the shooter is Muslim, on terrorism. However, according to a study on homegrown extremism by the New America Foundation’s International Security Program, there have been almost twice as many non-jihadist attacks than jihadist attacks, many of which were shootings, in the United States since September 11, 2001. The study defines jihadist actions as those taken on behalf of or motivated by al-Qaeda and its affiliates and non-jihadist actions as those motivated by extreme right-wing, left-wing, and other beliefs. While it is true that the San Bernardino and Orlando shooters, as well as the Boston Marathon bombers, all appeared to have unofficial loyalties to radical Islamist movements, it is unacceptable for anyone – especially politicians and presidential candidates – to propagate the idea that all of Islam is incompatible with Western values by associating terrorism with all Muslims.

Trump has seized on anti-Muslim rhetoric to bolster his presidential campaign and normalize a variety of anti-minority attitudes. The Bridge Initiative at Georgetown University reported an increase in Islamophobic language and actions during the 2016 presidential campaign season, including a possible correlation between Trump’s entrance into the race and anti-Muslim activity. And Trump’s xenophobic fear-mongering doesn’t end with Muslims. He has also made derogatory comments about other minority groups, such as Hispanics, whom he “other-izes” by referring to them as separate from the collective American (in Trump’s eyes, white, male, and Christian) “we.” Many Republicans have denounced his comments, which, all other politics aside, should be deal breakers for a presidential candidate, yet the party still coalesces around him. There are few clearer signs of a problematic cultural divide than this, and we see it appearing in other places too. The anti-refugee sentiments in Europe amid a worsening crisis in the Middle East, the near-success in Austria of a far-right presidential candidate campaigning largely on an anti-refugee platform, and the British vote to leave the European Union, which was motivated in part by immigration concerns, are just a few examples of how broader Western antipathy toward Muslims is impacting policy.

Just as fascism overtook Europe on the back of a culture war waged primarily against Jews in the mid-20th century, the United States also has a history of allowing fear of people who are “different” to dominate public discourse; think back to McCarthyism and the Second Red Scare, or 19th century prejudice against Irish, Italian, German, and Chinese immigrants. This is not to say that McCarthyism, the Know Nothing Movement, or today’s anti-Muslim rhetoric is equivalent to Nazism, but any path that pins a society’s problems on its minority groups is extremely troubling. There is no question that our leaders should take the threats posed by both gun violence and terrorism seriously, but it is equally unquestionable that we should reject any presidential candidate whose solution to those challenges and others is predicated on stigmatizing an entire group of people based on the actions of a few. Instead, it would do us good to reflect on the burgeoning racism and intolerance throughout American society and commit to truly “make America great again” by making honest efforts to fight those poisons.

Tania F. Cohen is employed by the American Society of International Law and is a Campaigns Fellow at Young Professionals in Foreign Policy. Her interests include domestic civic engagement, refugee and migration policy, and the influence of history on contemporary policy development and foreign relations. Any views expressed are those of the author and not those of the American Society of International Law.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Osmo Monster's Best Magic Trick Is The One You Never See

2016-08-04-1470275495-9503000-OsmoMonster.jpg
Source: PlayOsmo.Com

When people learn I have reviewed and played with over 700 toys and tech gadgets, they ask me two things. First, when are you going to grow up and get a real job? Second, what is the cool new technology that is coming out?

Technology Is Most Impressive When You Can’t See It

What my friends who have grown up and gotten real jobs don’t understand is that technology is most impressive when you don’t see it. Why was the iPod such a breakthrough? Because you didn’t need to know anything about MP3 files, bitrates or device drivers. The technology disappeared, folks got to listen to their music and the industry was never the same.

The new Osmo Creative Kit ($49) with the Osmo Monster app is a great example of sophisticated technology that completely disappears. Mo the Monster lives on your iPad and is doing a magic show. He needs your help, so he asks you to draw various things on the included white board. You draw and Mo pulls them into his magic show, where they become an animated part of the show.

Please take a look at our video review of the Osmo Creative Kit and Monster –

Mo’s Greatest Trick Is The One You Didn’t See

As you watched that video, did you ever hear Mo say – please draw darker, please shift the board over, please redraw, please increase the light, draw higher on the board or make your drawings larger ? No, you did not – and that is the real magic trick.

There is some sophisticated technology that allows Mo to pull off his Magic Show with your drawings, but the great thing is, you never see it. You draw, Mo pulls your drawings into the digital world. Seamless.

Want to Learn More about the Osmo Creative Kit?

Please read our full review of the Osmo Creative Kit and the Monster App at DadDoes.Com

More Information:

Visit Osmo to learn about all of their products.

Visit The Dad Does YouTube Channel to Watch More Reviews and check out the Dad Does Blog.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Pokémon Go Pisses Players Off Again By Making Pokémon Harder To Catch

Over the last week, Pokémon Go underwent a couple of mechanical changes that players really, really don’t like.

Read more…