Blogger Writing Challenge: You Can Rape Me Because I'm Drunk

I’ve never met Audrey Hayworth, a talented writer and blogger from Baton Rouge, Louisiana, but we are friends through social media. We are inviting all bloggers across the country to join us in an important cause on Friday, September 2 to participate in the “You Can Rape Me because I’m Drunk” challenge. Yes, it’s important.

We’re referring to the fact that the Stanford Rapist (I refuse to mention his name) will be released from prison after only three months in jail for raping and illegally penetrating an unconscious woman behind a dumpster on the Stanford University ground on January 18th, 2014. He’s free, unlike his victim.

He was caught in the act, arrested, and charged with five felony counts: rape of an intoxicated person, rape of an unconscious person, sexual penetration by a foreign object of an intoxicated woman, sexual penetration by a foreign object of an unconscious woman, and assault with intent to commit rape. He was found guilty on three charges, then Santa Clara County Superior Court Judge Aaron Persky sentenced him to six months in Santa Clara County jail. He was facing a maximum sentence of 14 years, but will be released after serving only three months.

Perhaps the judge was swayed by the compelling letter written to the court by the guilty man’s father. He described in agonized detail how his good son was so traumatized that he couldn’t eat steak any more. Imagine the profound suffering!

As writers and bloggers, we owe it to our daughters and granddaughters to stand up against this ridiculous miscarriage of justice. Use your voice. Write and distribute a blog.

Suggested titles are as follows:

You Can Rape Me Because I’m Drunk

It Was Only Twenty Minutes of Action

Can He Eat Steak Now?

Only Three Months’ Time Out

She was Asking for It!

Please join us on Friday and write and post a blog about this topic. Write for the victim or for yourself. Add it to every social media account you have and submit to other sites. Our testimony is our only defense. Help make the Stanford Rapist wish he were back in jail where he belongs. Finally, we can give a voice to our naked sister, bleeding and confused, violated on the dirty ground behind the dumpster.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

6 Hardcore Facts About Life-After-School Every Student Should Prepare for

2016-08-30-1472553931-898576-graduation.jpg

Credit

“Finally I’m free”, that’s what the cute Instagram pictures of graduates throwing their hats in the air seem to be saying.

Sure, graduating college is indeed an achievement. Yes it is also a sort of freedom from the shackles of academic demands and projects and annoying professors. But, is leaving school actually freedom?

I don’t mean to spoil anybody’s broth, just that some hard truths need to be told.

I have found that life has its highs and its lows, and pre-knowledge has a way of girding us up to survive both extremes, because believe me they both need to be survived.

Well, I have graduated college myself. And thinking about it, I really wish someone told me some of these things. Lucky you!

1. It’s Not Freedom; so Prepare for War!

You think student life was hectic? Introducing your first job! You will be buried with paper work for 8 hours a day, run errands for obnoxious bosses, and stare at computer screens till your eyes bleed. Okay, I’m exaggerating, but you get the picture.

Its independence, but it is not freedom. It means you learn to stand on your own. And it means you no longer expect stuff from people, people expect stuff from you. You need to switch your mind to war mode once you throw that hat in the air, because most likely you are throwing away what shred of freedom you had left.

Getting your mind ready to carry the weight of responsibilities for yourself and others will help you here.
Read a lot of business books too, if you want to venture into entrepreneurship!

2. Getting and Keeping a Good Job is no Joke; it’s a Skill you Have to Master

There are many reasons our job searches fail to yield, or when they do they yield crappy jobs. You will be working a long time and so you need to make sure you know what kind of job you really would be comfy in before you start your search…

There are actually many more job roles than most people know exist. So search your heart well and discover yourself before you leave school. I might fancy something in this industry, or I’m sort of interested in marketing, just isn’t going to cut it.

You may want to start by listing all of the areas and industries that you think you might be interested in,. Then consider what your natural strengths are and what you enjoy. Start now and you will be more equipped for the impending job search.

3. You May End Up Marrying Someone Else

“Not Allysha?… No way!”… Well, “yes way!”

The truth is bitter, but true nonetheless. Life changes so quickly after school that it will leave your head spinning. Your priorities change as quickly as your roles change. You may have to move away because of the job and so will your college sweetheart.

Meredith Forster, wrote a brilliant article titled “The myth of The College Sweetheart” and while I will not go as far as calling it a myth, her points are apt. A wife or a husband is often what suits your life and not your fantasies. And life changes very fast. You may get lucky, but don’t stake a lot of money on it.

4. Life Actually Has More Sections Than ‘School’ and ‘Chill’, you Will Have to Learn o Balance Them all

There is going to be family that makes demands on you, and relationships that drain you. There is going to be marriage and kids, and community involvements. You also need to go to the gym and eat well so you don’t grow too fat… yes you can actually become flabby… and probably bald too.

Too many people lose touch with real friends after school because they were shocked by the sea of pressure they were plunged into. You need to not make this mistake and to make conscious efforts to keep contact with good friends.

Stay away from negative people and relationships that drain you. Because, when the chips are down, only true friends make life merry.

Your home; the wife/husband and kids will come and come with their own demands, know that they are your priority. Balancing life’s demands is an art that you can start learning now.

5. People Will Still Think you are Crappy, but it Shouldn’t Matter as Much to you Anymore

In college there are those people that just wouldn’t let you be. They can’t stand the sight of you and then there are those who just won’t stop gossiping about you. Perhaps you were on the other end of the spectrum and you were the talk of the campus, the one everyone wanted to be seen with.

Either way it shouldn’t matter much anymore. In the real life, Nerds become Bill Gates and Quarterbacks become doormen. Anything is possible, really. The point is that you have to stop worrying about what people think. At that point all that will matter is what you think about yourself and what vision you have for life… pursue it and let people be people.

6. Life after College is not all Serious; Make sure you Seek fun.

You just heaved a sigh of relief didn’t you? Well, I saved the best for last. Truth is that life is never that serious and there is no need giving yourself a migraine. While responsibilities will surely rise along with its attendant pressures, life is not as serious as the adults made you feel…or this article for that matter.

I guess my point is that there are amazing experiences you may never have till you are out of school and that there is quite some fun in life, but you may have to seek it. You will need to.

So, before you throw up that hat, get your mind ready.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Dear Governor LePage

Dear Governor Lepage,

When I was young I invited an African American friend to Thanksgiving Dinner. I was a young white girl. We worked for the Committee for a Sane Nuclear Policy knocking on doors for nuclear arms control and peace in Central America. We were young idealists working for a better world. My friend was not able go home to Chicago for the holiday, so I invited him along to dinner. I did not think that my family would mind. I had always thought that because we belonged to a liberal Catholic tradition, because we lived north of Boston, we lived in a majority hispanic neighborhood, we voted Democrat, that my family were good people who were not racist and that it would be fine.

When he first arrived, everyone was polite. We all stood together to say grace. The meal was buffet style because there were so many of us. While my friend was waiting for gravy my 14 year old cousin cracked a racist joke. My uncle, a man in his forties, was standing right next to his son and did not apologize, did not correct my cousin. Instead, he laughed. My friend said nothing. Only later did he tell me it happened. After my friend left these enlightened people decided to release their discomfort with a good round of racist jokes, some about black people, some about Polish people, and, to their credit as equal opportunity offenders, a few blonde jokes.

This is what I took away from it, my family thinks that all folks should have equal access under the law but they could not reconcile their discomfort with their bias based on the stereotypes they refused to disbelieve. Or maybe I am just making excuses for them. They were just racists. They treated my friend as though his feelings did not matter. They treated him as less than. They did not judge him by his character, intelligence, or humor. He was working for peace. He is a very smart man. He has a great sense of humor. They took all the awful things they had heard, believed, assumed about black men and applied it to my friend. That’s racism.

I did not say anything to my family then. This is my shame. I was in my early twenties and pretty naïve. I was at an age when family dogmas were crumbling. I had lost my faith in the Catholic church, I saw sexism in the power structure of a subway ride, and I realized my family could be racist on a holiday founded on gratitude. It would be the last Thanksgiving dinner I would share with those members of my family. Everyone has that one uncle who thinks he can get away with being a jerk. Because he usually does.

Smart phones let us see what has always been. Young men are being shot in the streets by police. Institutional bias is so blatant that citizens of the United States are being exploited to fund the legal system that impoverishes and locks them up. We get state legislatures who pass laws limiting hard fought for voting access. We, white people, are confronted with our privilege and it makes us uncomfortable. Or it should.

We need leaders who lead.

Instead, we get Trump and his wholesale solution to immigration issues which rings with the historic terror of Germany 80 years ago. We get a Congress and Senate who has obstructed the first African American President at every turn, so he can not claim a success, to the detriment of the country. We get some media, who perpetuates biases with every turn of the news cycle. And we get you, a governor who should be a governor for all the people in the great State of Maine who panders to the base impulses of those who seek to divide.

Again, we need leaders who lead. Not Uncles who say anything that comes to mind regardless of who hears them, or Uncles who spew hate with the broad stroke of fear and discord.

Your apology to the people of Maine rings hollow. You did not apologize for your racially charged remarks. You did not apologize for the scandalous recording to a legislator. You did not apologize for the obscene language the children of Maine might have heard. You did not apologize for the threat of violence to another person. You did not apologize for the wholesale labeling of people of color as the enemy. You apologized for getting caught which is really no apology at all.

As a voter of the state of Maine, I would like to say your apology is not accepted.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Start with the Heart: Responding to our Children's Overwhelming Emotions with Love.

2016-08-30-1472563418-1852686-IMG_2639.JPG

I remember, at age 9, I declared I would never forget what it felt like to be 9. Each year after, I reminded myself…..I will never be one of those adults who can’t remember how it feels to be a kid.

I often felt, misunderstood.

I often felt out of control.

I felt voiceless.

I felt angry.

I didn’t feel I had a right to…..FEEL.

My misguided attempts at showing how I felt at any given time, were met with anger, discipline, and usually a blow up big enough that I learned my lesson……feeling was not okay. I needed to get it together.

This was not the lesson my parents wanted me to learn. Of this, I am sure. They wanted me to show respect. They wanted me to know my place. They wanted me to deal with my feelings, in a healthy, productive way. The problem was….they didn’t deal with their feelings in a healthy, productive way. They weren’t taught healthy coping skills, so we weren’t taught healthy coping skills. I mean, let’s be honest, “healthy coping skills” weren’t a top priority in a lot of families when we were growing up. But when you know better you do better right?

Now we know…. it’s a cycle. If we fail to recognize the cycle, we fail to connect with our children.

The reality is….many parents aren’t comfortable with feelings.

“Calm down”.

“Stop crying”.

“Don’t get so worked up”.

“Go to your room until you can get a hold of yourself”.

“Relax”

These are all ways we discard the uncomfortableness of feelings. These are all statements to give us the perception that we have control. We don’t.

Feelings are feelings. They aren’t bad, or good….right or wrong.

They just are.

We get taken off guard by feelings, when they come from our kids. Considering we have been having feelings since we were born, one would think that we would go straight to empathy…..one would be wrong. Our reaction can be largely dictated by how we were received when we had intense feelings. Were we taught that our feelings were expected….even welcomed?

Yes, of course….good feelings are always welcome aren’t they?

We welcome happy.

We welcome proud.

We welcome loving.

We welcome excited.

But it’s how we deal with the not so positive feelings that define us as a parent. What are the messages our children are receiving about their negative feelings? Are they allowed to have negative feelings?

How do we deal when our kids are sad? “Stop crying”.

How do we deal when our kids are mad? “Do you need to go to your room to calm down”?

How do we deal when our kids are frustrated? “You need to relax”!

When my kids were little, dealing with their feelings, seemed much easier. Smaller children don’t have as much expectation on them to “handle their feelings” in an appropriate manner, that we deem acceptable. We tend to expect the tantrums, and the meltdowns. They even give us a chance to shine our parenting light! Let’s use that knowledge we just brushed up on in the parenting book we were reading. Looky there…..it works! That isn’t to say it is easy, by any stretch of the imagination….just different.

Then, our little sweet buttercups become tweens and teens. Their feelings become a bit more convoluted. Their feelings aren’t so easy to figure out. Their feelings show themselves in behavior a bit more. That behavior can look disrespectful and just like that, our sweet little buttercups have turned into sassholes.

Those sassholes can elicit bad behavior from us as parents….depending on how comfortable with feelings we are. Time to ask ourselves some hard questions.

What are the cycles in your family of origin around feelings?

How did your parents deal with their own feelings?

Are you proud of how you deal with your own feelings?

Do you mistake mad, sad, or overwhelmed for “disrespectful” before it ever gets to that point?

Do you make room for negative feelings in your house?

Have you taught your children coping skills for negative feelings?

Do you get in a battle for control?

You guys….negative feelings take up a lot of space. If we don’t handle our own negative feelings appropriately, then how can we expect our children to know how to handle theirs?

I work with many kids in my practice as a psychotherapist, and a phrase I use a lot is “start with the heart” when helping them identify what they are feeling.

In my home, I am raising a 14 year old boy and a 10 year old girl. On a regular basis, I get attitude from my teen and tween. This is the norm. I wish I could say, it doesn’t happen in my house because I am all buttoned up.

Nope. It happens.

We love each other through it.

First I take a deep breath. I get to the root of what I am feeling. Because until I am under control, I can not be expected to have a mindful lens to look through.

Then….I start with the heart……

What might my child be feeling underneath all that sass?

What might have gone wrong in their day to elicit this meltdown?

How might they feel out of control right now?

I kneel down to where they are (or up in the case of my 5’6 teenage son).

I put my hand on their back, their leg or wherever they will allow.

I create a connection….remind them they are loved, no matter how they feel right now.

Then, I take all of my good advice. All of my “fixing” behavior….and all of my umpteen years of psychology education and I stuff it.

I choose instead to just name their feeling for them. Just reflect with them on how hard it is to feel this way. I talk about the emotion instead of shining a light on the behavior and how wrong they were for talking to me that way. For a moment, I am in their feeling with them.

Slowly, they soften. We begin to change our alliances. We are working together on figuring out these things called feelings.

We are on the same team.

They have just been validated.

We can now learn new coping skills around these feelings.

This doesn’t eradicate all bad behavior. This doesn’t turn our sassholes into buttercups forever.

What this does, is help preserve the coveted relationship with our growing children.

What this does, is help our children understand that we all have feelings, it’s what we do with those feelings that determines our path in life.

What this does, is position us….as parents in the role of mentor. Look at me….I too, have overwhelming feelings, and I too have to have healthy coping skills to deal effectively with those feelings.

What this does, is create a partnership on their journey. It opens the door to talk about our feelings instead of wish them away or act like they don’t exist.

What this does, is…..pave a path for empathy. The more empathetic we are to our children’s feelings, the more empathetic they will be towards themselves and others in the future. Thereby making relationships easier for them down the road…..all relationships, even the one with themselves.

That’s the goal isn’t it?

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Bernie, George and Me

Political junkie that I am, I watched most of both conventions. Even if I didn’t intend to, by 8 p.m. the TV set was on, tuned to CNN, with me in front of it. I watched the Republican Party proceedings, I told myself, because it was important to experience the Trump phenomenon directly.

The Democratic Party convention was more difficult. While I am closer programmatically, especially to the Sanders vision, I felt like an outsider. Somehow, for all the talk of diversity and inclusion, for all the identities not so subtly arrayed, my identity was not welcome.

I’m not a Democrat. I’m an independent, but so are 43% of the American people.

It made me think of when I was a Democrat. I hope these reflections on my experiences will help Sanders supporters, particularly young people, work through the disappointment of his rapprochement with the Clintons and the Democratic party establishment.

My experience at Columbia in 1968, as well as the other traumatic events of that year — the assassinations of Dr. King and Robert Kennedy — radicalized me. But my electoral orientation was still Democratic. I supported Eugene McCarthy’s presidential campaign against the war in Vietnam, and found myself that summer volunteering to staff the candidate’s Oakland California office.

The events at the Democratic Party convention that year in Chicago — the protests and the heavy-handed police response — shocked me, as did the iron-fisted nomination of Hubert Humphrey. Naively, I attributed this to Mayor Richard Daley and the Humphrey campaign.

It was the failure, fours years later, of the progressive anti-war candidate George McGovern that weaned me from the Democratic Party. The McGovern campaign was sabotaged by the Party, which preferred to lose a chance at the White House than have the left in power. He lost all but one state, Massachusetts. Nixon won McGovern’s home state of South Dakota. I vowed not to become involved in electoral politics again until there was something new, something radical. Something that might make a real difference.

In the meantime, I got my law degree, and took a job with a small law firm in downtown Manhattan that specialized in the development of low and moderate income housing sponsored primarily by labor unions. But I kept looking for that something new and radical.

I found what I was looking for when I met a rag-tag group of sixties radicals led by Fred Newman, a Stanford-trained philosopher who had left the campus to organize in the poor and working-class communities of New York City.

My colleagues and I let Newman’s brilliance organize our idealism and hard work in an effort to build an independent political movement that did not look to the Democratic Party for answers. Newman helped me see that the Democratic Party was the problem, not the solution.

No more George McGoverns. I supported and worked for Lenora Fulani in her historic run for President in 1988. She was, the first woman and first African American to be on the general election ballot in all 50 states.

Four years later, Fulani reached out to the “radical white center” who supported (by the millions) Ross Perot’s independent run for the presidency. The Democrats and most leftists dismissed Perot and his followers as fascists. For me and my colleagues, they turned out to be ordinary Americans (like the kind that came together to defeat the fascists in World War II) who were open to sincere, non-ideological dialogue as we worked to build something new together. It was exhilarating. And the parties worked overtime to shut this down. They succeeded, for a time.

It was clear that the country needed new alliances, a democratic revival and a restructuring of our electoral system if fundamental change was to happen. Newman taught me that the issue was not policy, but process. The American people, if allowed to express themselves democratically and outside the control of the two parties, would determine the kind of country they wanted. I am proud of the role I played in helping to identify non-partisan primary reform as a key element in making that possible.

I participated in the effort to bring together independent voters with African-Americans to elect Michael Bloomberg Mayor of New York and to rally independents behind Obama in the hope this would lead to a post-partisan America. It didn’t. Obama proved to be more Democrat than independent, and Mike Bloomberg took the stage in Philadelphia last month to lecture independents that we had to vote for Hillary this time around.

I feel close to the millions of Bernie supporters. Sadly, Bernie’s “political revolution” has proved to be 9 parts electoral politics and 1-part revolution. It will die if it does not move outside the Democratic Party and join with the 43% of the country who are independent. Bernie has decided not to lead this effort. The next steps are up to us.

As far as the Democrats are concerned, when it comes to left-of-center politics, they claim to be the only game in town. But that game is less and less able to produce the kind of change the American people need and want.

So, my friends who powered the Sanders insurgency — take some time, allow your disappointment and your humiliation to wash over you. Have the conversations you need to have to understand, and not just cognitively, what you have been through.

Bernie, George and Hillary are the past. You are the future.

(Harry Kresky, a lawyer in New York City, is counsel to IndependentVoting.org)

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Why We Can't Tell How Your Car Will Perform On That New Earth-Like Exoplanet

Recently, the scientific community was all excited because a new exoplanet was discovered, and this one is in the coveted “habitable zone” that makes real estate so valuable, and it’s even pretty close by! It’s called Proxima Centauri b, and I want to know how well my car is going to drive when I get it there. Sadly, we just can’t say yet.

Read more…

These African Elephants Will Need 90 Years To Recover From Poachers' Violence

If killing a 6,000-pound animal for nothing more than its tusks weren’t appalling enough, consider this: It will take nearly a century for African forest elephants to recover from the devastation that poachers caused in just over a decade.

That’s what a study led by the Wildlife Conservation Society calculated. The society said the study, published Wednesday in the Journal of Applied Ecology, is the first to look at the demographics of the forest elephants.

In combing through 23 years of data on the elephants in the Dzanga forest area of the Central African Republic, researchers found that a drastic decline in the population resulting from poaching and habitat loss has been exacerbated by an extremely low reproduction rate. 

Female forest elephants in the Dzanga population typically do not begin breeding until age 23 and only produce a calf once every five or six years, according to the study. In other words, they’re among the slowest reproducing mammals in the world. By comparison, females of the other African elephant species, the bush or savanna elephants, begin reproducing at age 12 and give birth ever three or four years.

Lead study author Andrea Turkalo, a scientist at the Wildlife Conservation Society, said in a statement that the new study provides a “critical piece of understanding regarding the dire conservation status” of the forest elephant species.

Between 2002 and 2013, the population of forest elephants plummeted 65 percent, an earlier inquiry led by the conservation society found. Recovery from that decline would take roughly 90 years, the new study reports.

“The main point is recovery will take 8-9 times longer than [the] recent decade of poaching,” George Wittemyer, another of the study’s authors, told The Huffington Post in an email. Wittemyer chairs the scientific board of Save the Elephants and is a professor in wildlife conservation at Colorado State University.

The 90-year projection assumes that current poaching will continue. If poaching were eliminated entirely, recovery of the Dzanga population to 2002 levels would take about 40 years, Wittemyer said. 

Some 100 elephants are killed in Africa every day by poachers, often for nothing more than the ivory of their tusks. Wittemyer’s hope is that this study will influence consumers of ivory to change their behavior.

“The data we present really paints a dire portrait of the forest elephant situation ― we are dealing with a highly sensitive, slow reproducing animal that simply cannot handle the pressure put on it by ivory consumption,” he said.

The report came out just days before the International Union for Conservation of Nature kicks off its World Conservation Congress on Thursday in Honolulu. The congress, held every four years, is the world’s largest environment and nature conservation event. Up for a vote this year is a motion calling on the union’s director general, Inger Andersen, to promote a resolution encouraging national governments to close their domestic ivory markets. 

In July 2015, President Barack Obama announced a proposed regulation to ban the sale of virtually all ivory across state lines, as well as to further restrict commercial exports. Hawaii, one of the largest ivory markets in the U.S., took its own action in June this year when Gov. David Ige (D) signed a bill effectively banning the sale of ivory and other products from a variety of animal and marine species.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Nick Viall (Yes, That's Correct) Is The New 'Bachelor'

Surprise!

Although everyone thought Luke Pell, who was a fan favorite on JoJo Fletcher’s season of “The Bachelorette,” would be named the new Bachelor, well, that’s not the case. In a shocking twist, longtime “Bachelor” franchise star Nick Viall was announced as the star of Season 21 on “After Paradise” Tuesday night.

“I’m more nervous,” Viall said when asked if he was excited to be the new Bachelor. He added that although he’s had his struggles in the past on the show ― you know, being a two-time runner-up ― he’s hoping his luck will change. Still, he’s not sure how to prepare for this exciting experience.

“I don’t know if anything really prepares you for it. Maybe some crunches and pushups? I don’t know. Maybe a lot of pushups.”

Viall made it all the way to the end on both Andi Dorfman’s and Kaitlyn Bristowe’s seasons. Even though he was painted as a “villain,” the 35-year-old redeemed himself on this season of “Bachelor in Paradise,” where he showed his true, kind colors. And, if you’re wondering what happened with his “Paradise” flame Jen Saviano, Viall admitted that although the finale hasn’t aired yet, they “don’t end up together.”

But being the great guy he is, Viall gushed, “Jen is an amazing woman, one of the best.”

When one “Bachelor” door closes, another opens. 

“I can’t be more excited about the possibility of it all working out,” Viall said on “After Paradise.” 

We can’t wait to watch his journey to find love unfold. 

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Can The NETGEAR Nighthawk Line Turbo Charge Your Internet?

2016-08-31-1472607394-102796-TurboInternet.jpg
If I list off some gadgets like these – smart phones, smart TVs, tablets, computers, Roku, Amazon Fire TV, Xbox and Playstation you probably think, wow, those are some cool gadgets.

On the other hand if I list off a cable modem and router, well you probably fell asleep when I said cable modem.

The thing is, if you want all those cool gadgets to be their coolest, they need a fast connection to your ISP and that starts with your boring cable modem and WiFi Router.

NETGEAR Nighthawk Line, Bringing The Razzle Dazzle to The Mundane

The NETGEAR Nighthawk line is looking to bring some impressive technology and design to the normally boring world of routers and modems. The key question is, do these Nighthawk products really increase your internet speed and coverage?

To find out we put the NETGEAR Nighthawk AC1900 WiFi Cable Modem Router (model C7000) and the Nighthawk X8 AC5300 Tri-Band WiFi Router (model R8500) to the test.

Please watch our full video review –

It’s Not Cheap, But You Can Have Much Faster Internet

As the video shows, we saw a very dramatic increase in both speed and coverage area with the Nighthawk modem and router. While the Nighthawk AC1900 WiFi Cable Modem Router costs about $210, it does allow you to return the cable modem you are renting from Xfinity or Time Warner, probably saving you $10 a month.

The much larger cost to swallow is the Nighthawk X8 AC5300 Tri-Band WiFi Router. At about $350, this is probably 4 to 5 times more than you are used to paying for a router. The thing is, this really is a case where you get what you pay for.

We went from 25 Mbps to about 170 Mbps. In addition, we got strong coverage in every corner of our house. Of course your mileage will vary based on your specific situation, but there is no doubt that the NETGEAR Nighthawk products deliver exceptional speed and coverage.

If coverage range is not a big concern, I would go with the Nighthawk AC1900 WiFi Cable Modem Router. If you have the budget and want to bump up the speed even further and expand the range, the Nighthawk X8 AC5300 Tri-Band WiFi Router is a super impressive piece of technology.

More Information:
Learn More About the NETGEAR Nighthawk AC1900 WiFi Cable Modem Router
Learn More About the NETGEAR Nighthawk X8 AC5300 Tri-Band WiFi Router

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Musical Chairs Galore, Should CA Sen. Feinstein Retire

Co-Authored by Maclen Zilber, Democratic Strategist and Campaign Consultant based in Hollywood, CA

With all the gushing news saturation, hype and boundless coverage of the 2016 Presidential Super Bowl battle between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump, we know the last thing you want to think about is the 2018 election.

But the cold hard reality is that there’s another election cycle coming down the pike, and it’ll be here before we know it.

Hundreds, if not thousands, of stories have already been written about the pending race to succeed Governor Jerry Brown as the Golden State’s next chief executive in 2018.

Undoubtedly, the Governor’s race is getting the attention it deserves. California continues to be the center of innovative public policy in the United States, and the chief executive of California is one of the most powerful politicians in the world. And, whoever is Governor of California instantly gets inserted on the map as a Presidential contender should they choose to run.

What’s not yet on everyones radar, however, is another plum position that turns its occupant into a Presidential contender: the Senate seat held by Dianne Feinstein.

Feinstein has given no public indication whatsoever that she will retire, but it is still nonetheless a real enough prospect for political obsessives to contemplate.

A hotbed for rising stars in the Democratic Party, California’s talent roster of those on the left runs deep. Most of those who are considered possible contenders for the seat are young enough to hold the seat for 20 or 30 years. As such, an opening for a coveted office such as U.S. Senate could lead to a crowded field of California political heavyweights the likes of which we haven’t seen in any states’ Senate primary in recent years.

From those who pondered about running for Senator Barbara Boxer’s seat in 2016 but ultimately decided not to run to those eyeing the Governor’s race in 2018 but haven’t yet made their intentions public, a vacancy by Feinstein might very well serve as a catalyst that creates musical chairs up and down the 2018 ballot.

With the exception of a few, most all-star California Democrats are either currently or will be in elected office by 2018. That means that those who jump into a possible U.S. Senate contest that year will have to bow out of running for re-election to their current job to compete. For those who are in a solid position because they won’t have to risk losing their seat, the fact is that if they prevail, their seat will become vacant and thus likely cause an election.

Lets begin our examination with members of Congress, who are, by definition, up for re-election every two years, including in 2018. Should any of them enter a potential Senate race, they could not run for re-election and thus would have to vacate their seat:

Rep. Adam Schiff, Member of House Intelligence and Appropriations Committees, contemplated running for Boxer’s seat in 2016, has millions parked in his federal campaign war chest.

Rep. Xavier Becerra, Chair, House Democratic Caucus, who contemplated running for Boxer’s seat in 2016, has nation-wide cache of deep pocketed donors and political allies.

Rep. Karen Bass, Member of House Foreign Affiars Committee, Member of Leadership in Congressional Black Caucus, statewide profile as former California Assembly Speaker.

Rep. Loretta Sanchez, a current candidate for Boxer’s seat this November. Should Sanchez lose, she still will have built up statewide name ID in the process of running.

Several of the current statewide constitutional officers who might be on a speculative short list for for U.S. Senate, such as Lt. Governor Gavin Newsom or State Treasurer John Chiang, are already running for Governor in 2018. Attorney General Kamala Harris is running for Boxer’s Senate seat this cycle, and Insurance Commissioner Dave Jones is already a candidate for Attorney General two years from now. That leaves the following slew of maybe candidates, all of whom would have to give up their current job or another office they may be aspiring for, to campaign for Senate:

State Controller Betty Yee, a former member of California’s Board of Equalization, Yee has run successfully statewide and amassed a solid record of watching over taxpayer money.

Secretary of State Alex Padilla, served as President of the L.A. City Council, in the State Senate, and now as California’s chief elections officer.

State Senate President Pro-Tem Kevin de León, a former State Assemblyman, recently shepherded through the legislature some of California’s most far-reaching environmental and women’s rights laws.

State Assembly Speaker Emeritus John A. Pérez, helped spearhead California’s economic rebound following the Great Recession, serves as a UC Regent, and has a statewide network as past legislative leader.

Very few local leaders possess the prerequisite gravitas and fundraising prowess needed to be a competitive U.S. Senate candidate. Those who do, include the following:

Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti, a former President of the L.A. City Council and U.S. naval reserve member, he is a widely popular Mayor in California’s most populous City. Up for re-election in 2017, a campaign for Senate wouldn’t mean he’d risk his seat to run.

Former Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, also a former Assembly Speaker, previously flirted with running for Boxer’s seat in ’16. Now suspected to run for Governor in ’18, if he doesn’t, Senate could once again be an option.

San Francisco Mayor Ed Lee, a former City Administrator, oversees the City that’s the nerve-center for much of the tech economy. Similar to Garcetti, Lee was elected in an odd-numbered year, meaning he wouldn’t have to risk losing his office to run.

Of course there are also several more not mentioned above, from Congresswoman Judy Chu to Long Beach Mayor Robert Garcia and Oakland Mayor Libby Schaaf, among others, but given our limited space here, we can’t list them all.

Just for kicks, there’s always the prospect of soon-to-be former First Lady and future California resident, Michelle Obama, running for Senate. Though, given the powerhouse that she is, an Obama candidacy could throw a wrench into all of the above all-stars’ plan who might jockey to climb a ladder to the highest legislative body around the globe. Her team insists she has no interest, however.

All in all, whether these leaders would throw their hats in the ring is far from certain, and for many, probably unlikely. In any case, for us political junkies who follow politics like a sport, as fans, this speculation is always the fun part.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.