Clinton, Trump, and Budget-Busting Tax Cuts

At the Democratic convention we got some insights into the Clinton campaign’s line of attack on Donald Trump. While they rightfully intend to confront his racism, sexism, and xenophobia, the Clinton campaign also seems prepared to attack Trump’s “budget-busting” tax cuts. This is an area where caution would be advised.

The basic story is that, in the usual Republican tradition, Trump wants to give huge tax cuts targeted primarily to the wealthy. According to calculations from the Tax Policy Center of the Urban Institute and the Brookings Institution, these tax cuts will cost $9.5 trillion in lost revenue over the next decade before accounting for interest.

Of course $9.5 trillion is a REALLY BIG NUMBER, and you can often scare people with really big numbers. But if we want to be serious about matters, we need to put this number in some context. The Congressional Budget Office projects that over the next decade, GDP will be roughly $240 trillion. That means that the amount of revenue lost due to Donald Trump’s tax cuts plan will be just under 4.0 percent of GDP. Given that we now spend 3.5 percent of GDP on the military, this is real money.

But before we join the “budget-buster” chorus, it is worth remembering that the economy is suffering from a serious shortfall of demand. This is the concept of “secular stagnation” that is now being embraced by many of the world’s most prominent economists. Before the 2008 recession, most economists did not take seriously the idea that the economy could suffer from a sustained shortfall in demand.

But in the years since the downturn, economists such as Paul Krugman, Larry Summers, and Olivier Blanchard, the former chief economist at the International Monetary Fund, have all raised concerns about secular stagnation. This means that they believe the economy needs additional spending in order to boost demand and employment and bring the economy’s level of output back towards its potential.

In this context, a proposal to have a big tax cut actually could make a great deal of sense. It would put more money in people’s pockets, which they could then spend. This increase in demand will lead companies to increase output and employment.

This doesn’t mean Trump’s tax cut is the best way to boost demand in the economy. First, the bulk of the tax cut goes to the people at the top of the income ladder. These are the people who already are doing very well. It seems more than a bit odd to be giving them a huge tax cut to make them still richer.

Furthermore, if the point is to have people actually spend the money, it would make far more sense to have the tax cut directed at low and middle income people. If we give Bill Gates another $1 billion, it likely wouldn’t affect his spending at all. On the other hand, if we gave a million low and moderate people $1,000 each, we would likely see spending increase by close to $1 billion.

Even better, the government can spend $1 billion directly on modernizing our infrastructure, paying for research into clean energy and other areas, and improving education, and childcare. These expenditures would boost demand and also increase productivity so that we would be able to produce more in the future. If we could somehow get Congress to agree to spend Trump’s $9.5 trillion tax cut on investment in these and other areas, it would be a great thing for the economy.

In fact, even here it is possible that the $9.5 trillion is too much. We do need additional spending to boost the economy, but we probably don’t need the $950 billion in additional annual demand that we’d get from using Trump’s tax cut for investment. (This is before including a multiplier effect.) Spending of this size probably would over-stimulate the economy, leading to higher interest rates and/or a serious run-up in the inflation rate.

But the idea of spending more and running larger budget deficits is a good one. Trump may take it too far and want to give all the money to rich people, but he is not wrong for wanting to increase the budget deficit to boost the economy. This is a position that progressives should embrace and ideally force the Democratic presidential candidate to embrace.

So when it comes to the Trump tax plan, we can criticize him for wanting to give so much money to rich people and for his unwillingness to support necessary public investments. But by deriding the Trump plan as a budget buster, we make getting support for these investments even more difficult. There are plenty of legitimate reasons for attacking Trump. It would be best to stay away from the illegitimate ones.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Strategic Leadership Challenges Confronting Black Lives Matters Movement

The Black Lives Matter Movement has an historic opportunity for unique 21st Century strategic community and political leadership. How they apply and exercise such leadership could potentially make it one of THE most important engines for meaningful social, economic and political justice for decades to come.
They recently released a comprehensive Platform Statement of their Movement. 60 orgs under BLMM came together to list 6 demands summarized in their Statement. https://policy.m4bl.org/ The Introduction of their Platform Statement says:

“Black humanity and dignity requires Black political will and power. Despite constant exploitation and perpetual oppression, Black people have bravely and brilliantly been the driving force pushing the U.S. towards the ideals it articulates but has never achieved. In recent years we have taken to the streets, launched massive campaigns, and impacted elections, but our elected leaders have failed to address the legitimate demands of our Movement. We can no longer wait”.

“In response to the sustained and increasingly visible violence against Black communities in the U.S. and globally, a collective of more than 50 organizations representing thousands of Black people from across the country have come together with renewed energy and purpose to articulate a common vision and agenda. We are a collective that centers and is rooted in Black communities, but we recognize we have a shared struggle with all oppressed people; collective liberation will be a product of all of our work”.

“We believe in elevating the experiences and leadership of the most marginalized Black people, including but not limited to those who are women, queer, trans, femmes, gender nonconforming, Muslim, formerly and currently incarcerated, cash poor and working class, differently-abled, undocumented, and immigrant. We are intentional about amplifying the particular experience of state and gendered violence that Black queer, trans, gender nonconforming, women and intersex people face. There can be no liberation for all Black people if we do not center and fight for those who have been marginalized. It is our hope that by working together to create and amplify a shared agenda, we can continue to move towards a world in which the full humanity and dignity of all people is recognized.”

“While this platform is focused on domestic policies, we know that patriarchy, exploitative capitalism, militarism, and white supremacy know no borders. We stand in solidarity with our international family against the ravages of global capitalism and anti-Black racism, human-made climate change, war, and exploitation. We also stand with descendants of African people all over the world in an ongoing call and struggle for reparations for the historic and continuing harms of colonialism and slavery. We also recognize and honor the rights and struggle of our Indigenous family for land and self-determination”.

“We have created this platform to articulate and support the ambitions and work of Black people. We also seek to intervene in the current political climate and assert a clear vision, particularly for those who claim to be our allies, of the world we want them to help us create. We reject false solutions and believe we can achieve a complete transformation of the current systems, which place profit over people and make it impossible for many of us to breathe.”

“Together, we demand an end to the wars against Black people. We demand that the government repair the harms that have been done to Black communities in the form of reparations and targeted long-term investments. We also demand a defunding of the systems and institutions that criminalize and cage us. This document articulates our vision of a fundamentally different world. However, we recognize the need to include policies that address the immediate suffering of Black people. These policies, while less transformational, are necessary to address the current material conditions of our people and will better equip us to win the world we demand and deserve”.

“We recognize that not all of our collective needs and visions can be translated into policy, but we understand that policy change is one of many tactics necessary to move us towards the world we envision. We have come together now because we believe it is time to forge a new covenant. We are dreamers and doers and this platform is meant to articulate some of our vision. The links throughout the document provide the stepping-stones and roadmaps of how to get there. The policy briefs also elevate the brave and transformative work our people are already engaged in, and build on some of the best thinking in our history of struggle. This agenda continues the legacy of our ancestors who pushed for reparations, Black self-determination and community control; and also propels new iterations of movements such as efforts for reproductive justice, holistic healing and reconciliation, and ending violence against Black cis, queer, and trans people”.

Elders of the 20th Century Civil Rights, Peace and and Labor Union Movements should commend and support our grandchildren leaders and participants in today’s Black Lives Matter Movement. In response to the successive use of lethal force by the police against Black Members of their communities, they have simply said to the police and to the greater non-Black communities ENOUGH IS ENOUGH. WE WILL NOT SIT OR STAND BY QUIETY AND GO SILENTLY INTO THE NIGHT while POLICE CONTINUE TO KILL US!

The nationwide community response to the Black Lives Matter Movement is based on a broader based and more inclusive and collective type leadership qualitatively different from the one or few persons’ charismatic leadership paradigm that characterized our earlier “Civil Rights Movement”.

This is not say our leadership was “less effective”, in the 1960s in achieving, for example, the passage of the 1964 Civil Rights Act or the Voting Rights Act of
1965. We are simply saying that it is important for today’s elders to recognize that the Black Lives Matters Movement maybe be able to achieve in the exercise of its new form of leadership an agenda that appears to be beyond what we were able to achieve.

It is instructive to note that Instead of the most exclusively male religious and civil rights leadership that characterized our Civil Rights Movement Today’s Black Lives Matters Movement consist of young Black LGBTQ and straight persons meeting and initiating protests based on a collective, rather than individual exercises of leadership.

Extreme care and caution, therefore, should be the watchwords of earlier civil rights leaders who seek to join, advise, and speak directly or indirectly for or about the current Black Lives Matters Movement. Otherwise, notwithstanding the best of intentions, such words or actions appear “paternalistic”, “dated”, “opportunistic” or worst, shamelessly “self-serving.

Because of powerful recently released Platform of the BLMM and mindful of the cautionary observation in the preceding paragraph, we want to comment about one of the major potential pitfalls we see and hear regarding certain actions and protests of the Black Lives Matters Movement.

We are referring to the strategy of the BLMM and some of its leaders or spokespersons to “internationalize” or the publicly tie and associate the Movement with the struggle of the Palestinians against continued Israeli occupation of Palestinian lands. We believe this issue, no matter how independently important it is issue is, on the merits, raises the bar for building a coalition of support beyond the capacity of the movement to sustain an otherwise great potential for widespread domestic support for its recently announced Platform Agenda.

Yes, we are aware that it was a hall mark of our early civil rights movement to express support for the anti-colonist movements for Independence Movements extant in various countries on the Continent of Africa in the last century. We repeatedly commented and publicly protested the imprisonment of Nelson Mandela by the South African government and condemned its racist Apartheid. Individual civil rights leaders would often join the picket lines around the South African Mission to the UN or the Embassy in Washington, DC.

We support the BLMM and its Platform Agenda because we believe they are and can be THE most current effective movement for mobilizing the largest and widest cross-section of people of goodwill in our nation to restrain and stop the police from shooting Black men as their first option in seeking to effect an arrest.

Consequently, we believe it is appropriate to ask how, politically and strategically is building such a coalition of support of BLLM’s demand for police accountability of shooting black men in our respective communities enhanced or achieved by asking such potential supporters to also condemn Israel’s continued occupation of Palestinian lands?

Yes, I am mindful of Dr. King’s often quoted statements that “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere” and our “inescapable network of mutuality”. These cogent and relevant observations comprised much of his strategic and moral vision underlying our efforts to end racial segregation in the United States in the 20th Century.

“The fierce urgency of now”, however, is to get our nation to immediately demand that the police to stop killing Black men NOW, TODAY! Consequently, it is necessary for as many persons of goodwill to join us in this demand; again, TODAY not tomorrow.

We also agree that Israel’s occupation of Palestinian lands must end ASAP. However, our analysis of the dispute convinces us that this cannot, and will not happen, unless it occurs on a negotiated basis between Israel and the Palestinian leadership. While we would like it to occur today or tomorrow, it will not. Why? Because, among other things, with due respect to the protests on various college campuses, today in United States, there is not currently a majority coalition of support for immediately ending such occupation.

Efforts to immediately end police brutality against Blacks in communities across our nation should not be dependent upon or tied to the issue of ending Israel’s occupation of Palestinian lands. We say this because we believe it is essential that a coalition be developed and mobilized domestically across our nation to stop police from shooting Black people, NOW! Today!

We respectfully suggest that it is or would be, politically a strategic mistake for the Black Lives Matter Movement to make such an effort dependent upon how many of those same potential supporters are prepared to see Israel immediately end its occupation of Palestinian lands.

Israel’s occupation of Palestinian lands is unlikely to occur except on a negotiated basis with Palestinian leaders. This should be encouraged and done ASAP.

In the “best of all possible worlds” it should occur today or tomorrow, however, it will not. Why? Because among other political realities, a broad based coalition of support for ending such occupation immediately, currently does not exist within the United States sufficient to force either a Republican or Democratic Presidential Administration to force Israel to do so.

Accordingly, while the Black Lives Matters Movement may want to encourage the end of Israel’s occupation of Palestinian lands, we respectfully suggest that they should not make this a central or major issue in their current struggle for Police accountability for the repeated and successive shootings Blacks across America.

A useful case study of the growth of the political and legal successes of the LGBTQ, Environmental, and other Movements has been written by David Coe in his recent book “ENGINES OF LIBERTY-The Power of Citizen Activists To Make Constitutional Law”. We highly recommend his book.

Although, not easy and often painstakingly difficult there is often an unavoidable challenge to the political leadership of an important movement to determine what are its most strategic priorities at any given point in the development of their movement and the companion actions required and “pitfalls” to avoid.

Such a moment now.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Earning the Business: Why Companies Are Putting Customization First

In today’s business world, everyone is racing to be seen as an industry leader. Companies want to be the next big thing but without shelling out the money that may be needed to run certain business processes. And corporations are offering cheaper, boxed solutions to meet the basic needs of these rapidly iterating companies.

What used to happen was you would buy a mass-produced, all-in-one solution where what was in it was what you got. You might have shopped around for various options before selecting one that was at your ideal price point and still meet your basic needs. But what many companies find themselves left with is trying to fit their business into a piece of software they bought and not always getting the results they expected. It’s like forcing a triangular block to fit into a square puzzle piece; sure, with enough force you can get the piece to fit but it’s not a perfect fit.

EMS Barcode Solutions is doing the exact opposite of typical industry practices with Flowtrac Software. An inventory and asset tracking management software company founded by Eric Sutter based in Texas, EMS Barcode Solutions is the business expert you need to help you efficiently run your company. They believe “service is standard” – in other words, excellent customer service and going above and beyond the client expectation should be the industry standard. Instead of simply handing your clients a boxed solution, EMS Barcode Solutions, in conjunction with sister company Barcode Trading Post works with your business to identify the ideal solution to address your needs.

Increased software customization can lead to increased work productivity, and EMS Barcode wants to be held responsible for all of your problems. Consider this: you run your business’ day-to-day activities but aren’t sure how to effectively manage your inventory. Rather than figure it out on your own, EMS Barcode alleviates this problem by managing your inventory for you and using a custom-tailored solution to assist your activity.

The difference between mass produced and customized solutions is the extra mile that some companies will go. Suppose you were choosing between a department store shoe and a custom, hand-crafted shoe. If you purchase a regular shoe from the mall, it might not fit your foot exactly. The shoe could be a little wide or too narrow, and you have to spend the first couple of weeks breaking it in and getting used to that shoe. On the other hand, if you went with a custom pair, the shoemaker would take the time to ensure that shoe fits perfectly to your foot. EMS Barcode is like the experienced shoemaker – they create a custom fitting solution that fits your business. And every enterprise is going to have varying challenges and expectations; no two solution should look the same and EMS Barcode prides themselves on their ability to mold software to fit your business, not the other way around.

This notion of customization is fairly new in the software solutions industry. Previously, companies would offer a solution and ask how it would fit within your company. Today, EMS Barcode is asking the client about their needs and problems first, then finding the ideal solution to address those pain points. Not only is this method much more effective, it also saves companies money down the road. Instead of having to replace a mass-produced boxed solution every few years, a customizable solution grows with your business and adapts to the changing problems as they appear.

As you grow your business, you’ll notice there will come a time when you need a third-party hand to help you run your company. As you shop around for software solution companies, keep in mind the importance of customizable services and whether an enterprise is ready to serve you five, ten years down the road. Spending the extra money now to find a solution that is specialized and unique to your organization will save you time and resources in the long run. It’s about who puts customer service first – the the companies who put their clients at the forefront are the ones who will emerge as an industry leader.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Here's Why Marijuana Advocates Say A Trump Presidency Would Be A Disaster

PHILADELPHIA ― Americans pleased with the country’s progress toward marijuana legalization should be wary of a Donald Trump presidency, cannabis advocates say.

Their reason: The possibility that New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie (R), one of the country’s most outspoken anti-marijuana elected officials, would be Trump’s attorney general.

Trump told Denver NBC affiliate 9News on Friday that marijuana policy should be “up to the states.” But his close relationship with Christie, an early Trump endorser and former U.S. attorney likely to be on Trump’s short list for attorney general, is giving pause to activists familiar with Christie’s record.

Chris Goldstein, a columnist for Philly.com and communications director for Philly NORML, the Philadelphia chapter of the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws, said Christie “would really be the one running that White House and that would be awful for legalization.”

“Donald Trump will say anything to get elected. He really has not been able to pin down a position on this issue,” Goldstein told HuffPost at a Democratic National Convention marijuana welcome party last week at Connie’s Ric Rac, a bar in South Philadelphia’s Italian Market. “Chris Christie is the most vocal anti-marijuana voice in America today ― literally.”  

Christie, while campaigning for president a year ago, said Colorado residents who smoke marijuana should “enjoy it” now, because he would enforce federal laws against marijuana on states that have legalized it. In March 2015, he called tax revenue generated from the sale of recreational marijuana “blood money.”

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

A May study released by New Jersey Policy Perspective, a progressive think tank, and New Jersey United for Marijuana Reform, a coalition of groups backing legalization in the state, estimated that legalizing recreational marijuana and taxing it at a rate of 25 percent would create $300 million in annual sales tax revenue. That $300 million happens to be the amount of spending on early childhood education, property tax rebates for seniors and other programs that Christie vetoed in a budget approved on June 30.

“We are dealing with an enormous budget deficit where our bridges and roads are falling apart,” said Ari Rosmarin, the public policy director of the American Civil Liberties Union of New Jersey. “That is money that our state needs. Yet that’s so-called blood money that he is happy to see the illegal market take in.”

(The ACLU of New Jersey is a member of New Jersey United for Marijuana Reform’s steering committee.)

Christie has not presided over a specific policy change tightening New Jersey’s enforcement of marijuana laws. But under his leadership, state law enforcement made a record 24,765 arrests for marijuana possession in 2013, and 24,689 in 2014. By contrast, there were 20,347 arrests for marijuana possession in neighboring Pennsylvania in 2014, even though the state has a much larger population. 

“The numbers don’t lie,” the ACLU of New Jersey’s Rosmarin said. “To the extent that his public comments can set a culture for law enforcement in the state, they would set one that favors aggressive enforcement of marijuana possession.”

Everybody thought the state passed a good law until Gov. Christie got his hands on it.
Ari Rosmarin, ACLU of New Jersey

New Jersey state Sen. Nicholas Scutari (D), a Clinton delegate, introduced the law legalizing medical marijuana in New Jersey, which then-Gov. Jon Corzine (D) signed shortly before Christie took office. Christie told Scutari he would not have signed it, according to the lawmaker. 

“I don’t think that bodes well” for a Trump administration with Christie in a key role, Scutari said at the DNC marijuana party.

Indeed, Christie’s implementation of that medical marijuana law has angered advocates for patients, who say state regulations impede access.

“Everybody thought the state passed a good law until Gov. Christie got his hands on it,” Rosmarin said. “Many patients have abandoned the medicinal system and gone back to the illegal market to get the medicine they need.”

Brian Murray, a spokesman for Christie, wouldn’t answer questions about the governor’s position on marijuana, in light of Trump’s remarks on Friday, but pointed to past comments. The Trump campaign did not respond to a request for comment.

Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton would reclassify marijuana from a Schedule 1 drug, the most severe prohibitive category, to Schedule 2, which would enable much greater research on marijuana’s medical uses, according to her campaign website. Clinton has said she respects the rights of states to legalize it, but would like to learn more about the results of those efforts before decriminalizing the drug nationwide.

The Democratic Party platform also calls for re-scheduling marijuana as a move toward “providing a reasoned pathway to future legalization.”

N.A. Poe, a local comedian and marijuana activist who organized the DNC cannabis party, is the Libertarian Party’s candidate for Pennsylvania attorney general. He said he plans to mobilize marijuana activists behind Clinton, because of his disdain for Trump and his fear of how Christie would affect marijuana policy in a Trump administration.

“If Chris Christie gets to be attorney general of this country, then I am going to be in Brazil smoking a joint this big and just relaxing on the beach,” Poe joked, spreading his hands apart.

Editor’s note: Donald Trump regularly incites political violence and is a serial liar, rampant xenophobe, racist, misogynist and birther who has repeatedly pledged to ban all Muslims ― 1.6 billion members of an entire religion ― from entering the U.S.

 

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Waze Traffic App Offers Child Reminder Feature For Parents And Caregivers

Waze Traffic App Offers Child Reminder AlertEvery summer we hear the tragic news of yet another infant, toddler or dog that succumbs to heatstroke and passes away in a hot car because a new parent or distracted caregiver forgets they’re there. If you’ve got kids or pets and you’re worried it could happen to you, check out Waze before another scorching day goes by.

These Moving Time Lapses Are Made with Just a Single Still Photograph

These Moving Time Lapses Are Made with Just a Single Still Photograph

Though it may seem like you’re watching a time lapse that uses hundreds of photos of a scene to track the passing of time, you’re actually just looking at a single picture “moving” with the magic of software called Platograph Pro. It’s one still photograph that’s been moved digitally. How?

Read more…

Gas Leaks, Fires, Thieves: Australia Is Having a Bad Time at the Olympics

Australia has it rough. The former penal colony is home to spiders, bigger spiders, Tony Abbott, and Baz Lurhmann’s filmmaking. But Australia’s Olympic teams, which are currently preparing to compete in the upcoming Summer Games, might have it the worst, and their competition includes a woman who recently mistook a large dildo for a duck.

Read more…

Can You Find the Cat Taking a Nap on This Pile of Wood?

Can You Find the Cat Taking a Nap on This Pile of Wood?

Let’s play a game. Can you find the orange tabby cat that’s supposedly taking a nap on this pile of wood without going crazy? I say supposedly because for a good few minutes as I was looking for the cute little guy, I swore that the cat didn’t exist or that the cat has transformed into a block of wood or that the cat had invisibility powers. All of those explanations were much more believable than an actual cat taking a nap on the pile of wood.

Read more…

Pro-Frackers Are Really Bad at Making Memes

God, this election is exhausting
, am I right? Hillary sucks. Trump is eight million times worse. I don’t even know what Gary Johnson looks like. And as of late, Green Party Jill Stein has been having some
issues
with science.

Read more…

Urbanista Seattle headphones let you share your music

Swedish company Urbanista has announced a new pair of headphones called “Seattle.” The Seattle headphones have an on-ear foldable construction with a fairly plain design and, in the case of three out of four models, a single-color scheme. The company hails this as Scandinavian minimalism, and it does hold its own sort of appeal compared to the myriad of complex, … Continue reading