Vogue Brazil Puts Breastfeeding In The Spotlight With Stunning Cover

Model Carol Trentini and her son have shaken up the September issue of Vogue Brazil with a stunning breastfeeding moment.

Zee Nunes photographed Trentini for the cover of the magazine during her pregnancy and after. Photos from the shoots feature the model while she was seven months pregnant and two months after she welcomed her son. Trentini said that Nunes along with stylist Pedro Salles “created the perfect atmosphere” for the gorgeous photo. 

On Aug. 25, the mom of two, who also posed with her older son, shared the cover on Instagram as well as her appreciation for the magazine.

“Breastfeeding my baby boy for @voguebrasil,” she wrote. “THANK YOU.”

Vogue readers have seen stunning breastfeeding photos within its pages before. For its March 2015 issue, Vogue Netherlands featured model Doutzen Kroes and her two kids on the cover as well as a photo of her nursing inside the issue.

Elle Australia also highlighted breastfeeding with Nicole Trunfio’s June 2015 cover. Similar to Trentini, she thanked the magazine in an Instagram post for taking one more step to #NormalizeBreastfeeding. 

“Thank you to ELLE for being so bold and making such an encouraging, positive and healthy statement,” she wrote.

See more from Trentini’s photo shoots below.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Stop Doing These Popular Exercises Wrong And Begin Seeing Results

We have all been in the gym before and have had our workouts delayed by gym pretenders. You know the type: they pick up the biggest weights and struggle the most, they use every machine incorrectly and in most cases are the ones who are forced to deal with serious back injuries and surgeries most frequently due to improper fitness technique. These “gym pretenders” have good intentions when it comes to fitness but they’re also stubborn. They refuse to admit they don’t know what they’re doing. Maybe you don’t like being referred to as a gym pretender but you can admit that you don’t know what you are doing in the gym. It’s no big deal, here are just a few exercises most people have knowingly and unknowingly done wrong:

Chin Ups
We have all seen guys try to show off by proving how many chin-ups they can (and cannot do). This exercise looks super easy at first glance but proper technique is everything. Make sure you properly align your hands by making sure your palms are facing your body.

Bench Press
The bench press is not just for men who want to appear big and strong. In fact, the primary purpose of the machine is to ensure healthy and longer lasting shoulders. The key in executing this is to make sure your grip remains tight to increase tension on your arms.

Sit Ups
Practically everyone dreams of perfect abs. One go-to method that many resort to is a sit up and practically everyone is doing it wrong. In order to do a proper sit-up, you must lie on your back with your knees bent with feet flat on the floor. Making sure you do a sit up properly is key if you want effective results.

Push-Ups
Most people are introduced to push-ups at a very early age. These are often introduced during fitness assessments at various schools in order to determine rather or not a student is physically fit. One of the top reasons why people do push-ups wrong is because they don’t align their bodies correctly. When doing a push up make sure your body is in one straight line.

Squatting

Squatting promotes stronger legs and glutes. It is a popular technique used by women who are attempting to increase the size of their lower back sections. In order to do this properly your posture is key.

Begin by standing against the wall to help with proper stance. Once you have done that you are ready to do a proper squat with your back straight the entire time. Your back should never bend during a squat.

What exercises have you seen done wrong consistently? Leave your comments and how to’s below.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Indecesion

Nancy Regan got it right, even though we all laughed at her seeming simplicity. Those two letters are always the safest, easiest way to go. Just saying “no” will keep you out of a world of trouble. Although it can be extremely difficult, at some point you do just have to say no. I will no longer do… fill in the blank. Of course it is a bit more complex – there are many things that drive behavior. Our pasts, our character and happenstance all influence our decision-making process. Most of us have learned right from wrong, no matter how subjective, and know when we should say no, even if we don’t say no.

Some would argue “yes” is far easier. Just agree and go along, get on with it. Say yes to that thing that may or may not be good for you. Get ‘er done as the cable guy says. It seems more risky though. You’re agreeing to action versus inaction. No almost always means choice “D”, none of the above. No always mean no.

And sometimes yes means no and no means yes. Yes to no more drinking and no I will do that. Kind of like positive and negative reinforcement. They both end up getting the same place but just take a different route.

Decisions are always hard, there is no doubt about it. But always saying yes, or always saying no is never going to get you where you need to be. We all know many nay-sayers and yes-men. I think we can easily identify the Eeyore or brown nose. I think they are universally disliked.

Indecision, self-doubt and fear of failure clouds our thinking. Sometimes we are so afraid of failing that we fail to decide and then we surely fail. All we can do is to make the best decision based on the information we have, right or wrong. And sometime it will be either or both. Deliberation is critical process that needs to cloud our mind. It’s OK to be unsure but resolution requires action, positive or negative. If you choose to not to choose, as Rush said in Freewill, you still have made a choice.

So yes or no isn’t the right answer. It’s about taking the best action that may be right for you, unafraid and accepting that in-spite of your best efforts, you may be wrong. But you may be right too.

We live in a world of imperfect choices. Somethings may never be completely right or wrong. Decide to decide and move forward. If you take the world as it comes, hopefully you’ll get it more right than wrong.

Say yes to no and no to yes and one of them is bound to be right, no? Just do it!

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Slow-Mo Mirror Smashing Is All It’s Cracked Up To Be

This may shatter your expectations.

In a moment of reflection, the Slow Mo Guys decide to throw a hammer through a mirror and film it in super slow motion.

First the guys give a not-too-revealing view of the predictable shattering at 2,500 frames per second. But then we get to the very cool reason we’re wasting our time on the internet for this one: a detailed look at 120,000 frames per second that shows what the lads describe as a “shockwave.” 

Daniel Gruchy ponders the years of bad luck he’ll have for the mirror breakage, but if the goal was to entertain us, it was worth it.

type=type=RelatedArticlesblockTitle=Related…More Slow Mo Guys + articlesList=56ba042ce4b08069c7a8c5a4,57056923e4b0b90ac27113bf

 

h/t Tastefully Offensive

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Human Skulls Are Being Sold Online, But Is It Legal?

This post originally appeared on National Geographic.

In 2011, an archaeologist in the United Kingdom picked out one of the many human skulls sitting on his shelf. The 17th-century European male was missing most of his teeth and mandible, but the skull was clean and generally in decent condition. The archaeologist photographed it, described it, and listed it on eBay.

At the time, the popular online auction site allowed anyone to trade in human bones as long as the remains were clean, articulated, and for medical purposes. The 17th-century skull was neither articulated nor did it go to a doctor, but it did fetch the archaeologist $750, minus the usual fees from eBay and PayPal.

This was the skull that started Zane Wylie’s obsession. Wylie was studying facial expressions, and he wanted an authentic skull to study how muscles attached to the bone.

“I looked online to see if I could get a real skull, and to my surprise, there were several dozen available,” says Wylie, who asked to go by the pseudonym he now uses for business purposes.

He named his acquisition “Yorick,” the first of many skulls he’d eventually purchase online. By late 2011, he had started carving designs into them and selling them on websites and at conferences, eventually making a living primarily through his boney art.

Wylie was hardly alone: Communities of people who collect oddities and bones were well aware of how easy it was to list something on eBay when no one had to prove provenance or medical affiliation.

But now, academic and legal professionals are starting to take notice.

On July 4, an analysis published in the Journal of Forensic Sciences described how, over the course of just seven months, sellers listed 454 human skulls on eBay, with an average opening bid of around $650. The authors, Christine Halling and Ryan Seidemann with the Louisiana Department of Justice, also noted the trade of human skulls on other websites like Yahoo! and Facebook.

Just four days after the study was published, eBay banned trade in human remains except head hair, which is commonly used to make wigs and Victorian-style art. Sellers’ items were pulled from the site, and any listing fees they had paid were refunded. (Find out more about Victorian-era jewelry made from human hair.)

The move may signal a drastic rethink of what is currently a largely legal trade in human bones.

The official reasoning from eBay for the policy change was: “The sale of humans and human remains is prohibited by law, and sellers can’t list them on eBay.”

Perhaps shockingly, that’s not exactly true, but the move may signal a drastic rethink of what is currently a largely legal trade in human bones.

In addition to the eBay decision, the state of Louisiana banned trade and even ownership of almost all human remains shortly after the study appeared. Bone traders started to get nervous. Some deleted their Instagram accounts featuring human remains. Some canceled their interviews with National Geographic. The Bone Room, a store selling bones of all types, sent a note in their August newsletter saying that they consider the eBay ban worrisome.

“I suspect a law will be passed, and I will no longer be able to sell human bones to artists, cadaver dog trainers, or people who just want to own a femur or a skull,” the store owner said in the newsletter.

 

Historical Heads

Right now, most human skulls in the general U.S. market come from antique medical skeletons.

In the 1700s, medical schools had to provide skeletons for their students, and the supply largely came from India. Hindered by changing laws in 1832 that put an end to unchecked grave robbing in the U.K., British doctors pressured Indian people who dealt with the disposal of human remains to sell the bones instead.

Soon, India had a thriving bone industry that supplied much of the Western world with medical specimens. The history, the opportunity for entrepreneurship, and the fact that many families were too poor to cremate their loved ones helped India dominate the human bone niche.

But in 1985, one dealer was caught selling more than 1,500 child skeletons of unknown origin. India promptly banned exporting human remains over concern that people were being murdered for them. For a while, China took over India’s role as global bone merchant, but they also banned exports in 2008.

Over time, as various medical schools closed or downsized, or as professors sold off their collections at estate sales, the bones changed hands, and some ended up on the oddities market.

Modern Donors

People in the medical world and related fields can still get new human skulls from U.S. donors. That’s because not all bodies donated for non-transplant anatomical science are studied whole. A doctor might teach her medical students elbow surgery using a dead person’s arm, a chiropractor might want a cleaned spine, and a retailer might take the head for cleaning and sale. (Find out how modern body donation is saving lives.)

Skulls Unlimited is the only company in the U.S. that is legally cleaning human heads that come straight from donors. When they receive a donor head, they cut off as much meat as they can, and remove the brains with a special tool. Then the cleaning crew dries the skulls for a few days before putting them in a colony of dermestid beetles, which will eat off the rest of the fleshy bits.

The company will only sell donor skulls to bona fide doctors, nurses, dentists, anthropologists, and people with valid scientific or medical reasons to have them. However, they sell antique skulls to anyone who wants them.

In addition to Skulls Unlimited and The Bone Room, OsteologyWarehouse.com, Skullstore.ca in Canada, and countless brick-and-mortar stores across the U.S. also specialize in selling bones of various species, including humans. You can find human remains for sale on private websites like Wylie’s, plus on some big online platforms like Facebook. (Facebook declined to be interviewed for this article.)

Law and Order

For now, these bone collectors don’t legally need any credentials to buy and sell human skulls that are already on the market. And in the U.S., there is no federal law prohibiting trade and ownership of human remains other than those from Native Americans.

 

In 1985, India banned exporting human remains over concern that people were being murdered for them.

Many collectors erroneously believe that only three states—New York, Georgia, and Tennessee—ban trade in human remains across state lines, based on a post on The Bone Room’s website and reiterated in their August newsletter.

In reality, the laws are lacking in some states, unenforced in others, and nearly impossible to fully comprehend by buyers, sellers, or site administrators.

Seidemann, who is an attorney at the Louisiana Department of Justice, agrees that the laws are too protean and complicated for sellers to keep track of. “It’s a moving target,” he says. There is no comprehensive online resource to determine the legality of trade in human remains on a state-by-state basis, and neither academics nor collectors (even the ones with lawyers) were able to cite the details of each state’s laws when asked by National Geographic.

However, even if human bones are technically legal to own and trade, there is a chance that some remains were grave-robbed, stolen, or misappropriated. The recent article by Halling and Seidemann noted that 56 of the 454 skulls they analyzed from eBay were probably not medical specimens, but ones of forensic or archaeological interest.

Brian Spatola, curator of the anatomical division of the National Museum of Health and Medicine in Maryland, says that he has recovered several human skulls that had gone missing from academic collections just by watching eBay.

“In many of these instances, the materials were being sold by someone who claimed to have purchased them from an estate sale and professed to not know its history,” Spatola wrote in an e-mail statement on the topic. “Each of these was ultimately returned.”

Shroud of Secrecy

Ethical concerns are no less complicated. Damien Huffer, an anthropologist at the Smithsonian’s Museum Conservation Institute, would like to see collectors stop trading in human remains, especially archaeological and ethnographic specimens, on social media. Ownership is “legal by default,” he says, “but that doesn’t wave away all the issues.”

Huffer and his colleagues monitor website tags used by human remains traders on Instagram and other social media sites. He suggests that other users do the same and report people who sell remains to Facebook and Instagram. That way the companies are aware it is happening, even though right now neither of those websites has anything in their terms of service or community standards that restrict such sales.

Still, collectors usually have their own code of ethics, and most know what to avoid.

Skulls Unlimited co-owner Josh Villemarette is confident that the skulls they trade in come only from legitimate sources: “If it was a murder victim, there would definitely be ways for us to know that, just because the standard person’s not going to be able to get it clean,” says Villemarette, adding that he has never been offered something that he even suspects came directly from a murder victim.

“But there are times when you receive a photograph of a skull that someone’s wanting to sell that’s very clear that it’s been dug up,” he says.

“Something that’s intended for medical purpose, cleaned and sold into the scientific field, and refurbished ones—those are very clear that they’ve been intentionally cleaned for that purpose. Anything that’s been cleaned underground, there’s a very distinct look to them. That’s a red flag to us, and when we get those photographs, we straight away tell them that we’re not interested.”

And despite the recent dustup over eBay and Louisiana, Wylie says he’s not too concerned about his business. He figures that more people will instead buy directly from his website or from sellers at conventions, adding that anyone who wants to become art after they die can will their skull to him. (Read about other creative things to do with a dead body.)

So at least for now, he and other bone traders continue to sell online, just with a little more secrecy and care than they had before.

“Somebody who buys skulls and somebody who sells skulls, we don’t like to trade names,” says Wylie. “All it takes is for somebody to write an article, and our business could be over.”

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Apple will unveil the next iPhone on September 7

Apple invite Apple just sent out invites for a press conference on Wednesday, September 7. The company will most likely unveil the next iPhone. The invite doesn’t say much. Apple usually likes to give hints — but this time, it just says “See you on the 7th.” The event will be held at the Bill Graham Civic Auditorium in San Francisco. This large venue has already been used for the… Read More

Apple and Sony will fight for your attention on September 7

iphone-v-ps4 On September 7 at 10 AM, Tim Cook will walk on stage and start the most anticipated tech press conference of the year — the introduction of the new iPhone. In New York, two hours later and right around the time Apple’s conference ends, Sony will also introduce the PlayStation 4 ‘Neo’. These two companies will be fighting for your attention in a sort of press… Read More

Knight Rider’s KITT Is Actually Horrible To Drive

Fire up the synth music. Blow dry your hair and throw on a leather jacket. It’s time to take a shadowy flight into the dangerous world of a man who does not exist, and then be… deeply disappointed.

Read more…

What Are Your Favorite Desktop Computer Speakers?

If you ever listen to audio from your computer, the speakers that came built into you machine simply won’t do. In fact, even the cheapest set of desktop speakers will blow away the best ones built into a laptop.

Read more…

Facebook's Trending News Is A Total Mess

Facebook unceremoniously fired at least 15 editors from its trending news team on Friday, as Quartz first reported. The decision to eliminate humans came three months after Gizmodo’s reporting revealed the inner workings of the trending news group, including allegations from former curators that their colleagues suppressed conservative news.

Read more…