Enjoy Your Day Off For Labor Day (Unless You're A Low-Wage Worker)

Labor Day is a time to celebrate the U.S. labor movement and all its hard-won victories ― including holidays, like Labor Day itself. And yet nearly one in four workers won’t be enjoying the day off with pay on Monday.

Twenty-three percent of private-sector workers in the U.S. don’t get paid holidays off from their jobs, according to the most recent data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. That’s roughly the same amount of workers who don’t get any paid vacation time.

Although most of the U.S. workforce does get paid holidays off, it’s low-wage workers who are the most likely not to. Among those in the lowest-earning quartile of workers, a little over half do not get any paid holidays. By contrast, more than 9 out of 10 workers in the highest-earning quartile do get paid holidays.

In other words, the less you’re paid to begin with, the less likely you are to spend Labor Day with your family without sacrificing a day’s pay. Just as you would be vastly less likely to be able to stay home from work while sick. Only 39 percent of workers in the bottom quartile get paid sick days, compared to 84 percent of workers in the highest.

As far as paid holidays go, the most recent survey shows a slight improvement over the previous year. When The Huffington Post reported on the data last year, 48 percent of workers in the lowest-paid quartile had said they got paid while not working on holidays, compared with 52 percent this year. Among the highest earners, the rates went unchanged.

Not surprisingly, the workers least likely to have paid holidays are those who are employed in the service industry or work part-time.

The U.S. has 10 official federal holidays on the calendar ― all days on which the federal government is generally closed and federal workers stay at home. But unlike most other developed countries, the U.S. does not mandate that private-sector workers get to enjoy paid holidays.

According to an analysis by the Center for Economic Policy and Research, most nations that are members of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development guarantee at least six paid holidays for workers. Those without such a mandate still manage to guarantee paid vacation time. The U.S., however, doesn’t guarantee either.

Some liberals in Congress would like to change that. Rep. Alan Grayson (D-Fla.) has sponsored legislation that would require employers to give their workers at least some paid vacation time, a concept strongly opposed by business groups and most Republican lawmakers. Grayson has pitched the idea as basic economic fairness. “Overwhelmingly, it’s the low-income workers who don’t get the paid vacation,” he previously told HuffPost.

Although the idea of a paid vacation or holiday mandate hasn’t caught on, more and more Americans like the idea of guaranteeing workers sick days. Four states ― California, Connecticut, Massachusetts and Oregon ― have laws on the books that make sure workers can accrue paid sick days through their jobs, as do a growing number of liberal cities. And although paid sick day legislation has stalled in Congress, President Barack Obama recently signed an executive order requiring federal contractors to give their workers some amount of sick leave.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Hillary Clinton Looks Strong Heading Into Fall

As Labor Day neared, the decisions the two major party presidential candidates made on how to spend their time said everything about how they’ve approached the race. August found Hillary Clinton in the Hamptons, where she attended at least a dozen high-dollar fundraisers, according to people who spent time with her there.

Donald Trump, meanwhile, jetted down to Mexico and softened his tone on immigration, hardened it right back up again at a rally in Arizona and launched an international Twitter war with the Mexican president he had just met.

Clinton can afford to spend her time fundraising rather than holding rallies. With just over two months until Election Day, she holds a solid lead over Trump in the polls, although the spread has been tightening as Clinton’s post-convention bounce wears off and Trump gains a little strength.

An utter landslide for Clinton looked more likely immediately after the conventions, when she regularly saw double-digit leads in national polls. HuffPost Pollster’s model, which aggregates publicly available polling, currently gives her a lead of about 5 points in a head-to-head race nationally, down from more than 8 points at the height of her post-DNC bounce. Clinton also has a 5-point lead on average when third party candidates are included in the poll questions.

A 5-point lead leaves room for Trump to catch up, but it’s still considerably wider than the edge President Barack Obama enjoyed over Mitt Romney at this point during the 2012 cycle. And Clinton’s lead has been remarkably consistent: Not a single poll included in HuffPost’s average has had Trump ahead since late July. Historical precedent suggests that bodes well for her. In each of the past 16 elections, the candidate leading after the conventions has gone on to win.

State polling tells a similar story. Clinton is leading Trump by a significant margin in many battleground states, with leads of between 6 and 9 points in Colorado, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania, Virginia and Wisconsin. In another set of swing states, including Florida, Iowa, North Carolina and Ohio, she holds smaller edges of between 2 and 3 points. The only swing state Trump has on his side is Nevada, but only by a very narrow margin. And he only musters 1- to 3-point leads in traditionally red Arizona, Georgia and South Carolina.

Current presidential forecasts from five different modelers put Clinton’s chances of winning between 71 percent and 94 percent.

Given the perceived improbability of a Trump victory, many Republicans are turning their attention to other races. They’re hoping to convince voters to split their tickets and choose GOP candidates for gubernatorial, Senate and House races, even if they don’t intend to vote for the Republican presidential nominee.

Democrats, meanwhile, hope to leverage Trump’s electoral weaknesses to make gains in Congress. A source who spent time with her in the Hamptons said that Clinton’s main objective at this point in the campaign is to win by a wide enough margin that Democrats take the Senate.

Republican Senate candidates are outperforming Trump in most of the states where HuffPost Pollster has sufficient polling data for a model. But even if they’re doing better than Trump, many are still trailing their Democratic competitors. According to HuffPost’s predictive Senate model, the Democrats currently have a 62 percent chance of winning 50 or more seats in the Senate.

The probability of a Democratic Senate takeover is lower than previously reported by the model. In mid-August, it predicted a 78 percent chance that the Senate would comprise 50 or more Democrats, including a 55 percent chance that there would be at least 51 Democrats and a 23 percent chance of a tie. Now that has shifted to a 32 percent chance of 51 or more Democrats and a 30 percent chance of a 50-50 tie ― which would still be a Democratic majority if Clinton wins and vice presidential nominee Tim Kaine becomes the tie-breaking vote.

Most of that shift is due to incumbent Republicans strengthening their positions. Sen. John McCain (Ariz.) has benefitted from improved polling numbers, raising his probability of holding his seat from 73 percent to 94 percent. And Sen. Marco Rubio (Fla.) has come up from a 50 percent chance of winning ― because the last model run was before the Florida primaries had determined the candidates ― to a 96 percent chance.

Despite the lower overall probability of a Democratic takeover in the election simulations, the outcome predicted by the model based on the most up-to-date data is 51 Democrats, including the two independents who caucus with the Democrats, and 49 Republicans. The five seats that the model indicates could flip to make that happen are in New Hampshire, Illinois, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin and Indiana ― the most likely Democratic pickups being Wisconsin and Indiana.  

Ryan Grim contributed reporting.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Amazon's Blowing Out a Bunch of Your Favorite Anker Gear, Today Only

Anker makes some of your favorite electronics and gadget accessories
, and a bunch of its best stuff is on sale in today’s Amazon Gold Box.

Read more…

iPhone 7 Plus turns up on Geekbench, destroys Snapdragon 820 Androids

iphones-2Yesterday a rumor popped up that suggested that the iPhone 7 Plus would be packing a new 2.4GHz A10 processor under the hood. The rumor also suggested that the new iPhone would also come in a new color called piano black. Today the iPhone 7 Plus has allegedly turned up on GeekBench showing off its impressive performance. The GeekBench results … Continue reading

Galaxy Note 7 recall costs expected to top $1 billion

samsung-galaxy-note-7-review-6-1280x636-980x420Just as things were looking really good for Samsung with the launch of its popular Galaxy Note 7 smartphone, it all went wrong. Reports of Note 7 smartphones catching on fire while charging started coming in and then Samsung officially announced a recall on all of the Note 7 smartphones that had been sold. Analysts are now chiming in on … Continue reading

HSBC's 'selfie verification' helps customers open a bank account

In a bid to replace the password, banks have jumped about the biometric bandwagon and are experimenting with new ways to authenticate their UK customers. Between them, HSBC and Barclays have already trialled fingerprints and used Voice IDs over the t…

IFA 2016: The rose gold edition

No, Apple didn’t invent the color pink, but it certainly made “rose gold” famous. It all started last year with the company’s first rose gold iPhones, the 6s and 6s Plus, which quickly inspired other manufacturers to embellish their own devices with…

OIO introduces Amp iPad speaker case

oio-ampThe idea of tablets being used as a portable media player is not new at all, but then again, neither is it something which is all the craze these days. The tablet market has definitely been on a decline, if slightly, in recent times, and it does not look as though it is going to pick up anytime soon either. This does not mean that there is no money to be made where tablet accessories are concerned, since there is still a sizeable market out there. However, the choice of accessories would certainly come under scrutiny, since there is plenty to look forward to if you are going to kit out your tablet — or iPad in particular, with a speaker case. Yes, you read that right — a speaker case, which is something that does not arrive every other day.

OIO is an independent startup and innovator in portable tech products and audio solutions, having announced Amp, which is an ultra-portable iPad speaker case for the iPad Air, iPad Air 2 and iPad Pro 9.7. Amp happens to be the only integrated surround sound theater system of its sort, sporting symmetrically positioned right and left channels in order to deliver a true stereo sound theater experience with your iPad.

Amp’s high end stereo sound will include a couple of ultra-low profile electromagnetic exciters, multiple audio codecs (A2dP), and a pair of resin fiber honeycomb acoustic panels which are covered with microfiber optical quality fabric. This kind of portability ensures that the Amp makes for a great traveling companion as it delivers high quality entertainment anywhere in a sleek protective case.

The lightweight speaker case is compact, highly durable, and versatile, where its folding speakers will close over the iPad. Not only that, its stand will fold back behind the case, resulting in a theater experience that goes just about anywhere. The initial round of mass production is already underway, where it is tipped to ship later this month for $249 a pop.

Press Release
[ OIO introduces Amp iPad speaker case copyright by Coolest Gadgets ]

Fallacy of Teaching Maths and Science in Mother Tongue

Language can be your most powerful ally in your arsenal, or enemy; for centuries it has been used to divide and unify a nation.

Taking a closer look at it’s role in educating our children in subjects like maths and science, specifically at an early age. As we indulge in this matter with Hendrik Marais to explore it’s impact and how it can be addressed.

The inability of hundreds of languages around the world who don’t have direct translations of core scientific and mathematic terms is a hindrance for students to face the real world, and apply their knowledge, resulting in them being globally incompetent.

The obstacle is the absence of certain terminology in many languages compared to English. The underlying implication is that it’s the language barrier preventing students from excelling in maths and science.

It is easy for countries like Australia, England and Canada where the majority speak English, the matter is not of greater concern; but when you look at countries in Europe, Africa and Asia, this becomes a challenge to be dealt with.

Key to the debate is the issue of understanding, whether through a certain medium of instruction, be Spanish, Afrikaans, Venda or English, particularly at a foundation level of schooling; that if not carefully addressed it might have remedial consequences.

If you are in education or politics and you have failed in your mission to ensure there are enough learners leaving school to fill all the vacancies for positions where mastery of maths or science is required, possibly 80% of well-paying jobs.

We also know from all the current brain research that the foundation for later learning must be laid from as early as six months. This window of opportunity to learn an extra language and master the basics of maths is wide open in the early years but largely closed by about eight or nine and then become remedial.

Why don’t we spend time and money to let children learn basic concepts which are the foundation for all future learning, especially mathematics in English from the earliest grade – when it’s natural and easy for them? Officially they are supposed to have four or five EFAL (English First Additional Language) classes per week. When I talk to teachers they tell me nothing happens in those classes in far too many schools. Children at this age can easily understand mathematical concepts in English such as counting, addition, subtraction, shapes etc.

It’s sickening that learners who will eventually be taught in English maths and science, but it is introduced in Grade 4 where the learners have to switch to maths in English; even when many of them haven’t yet mastered basic numbers, addition and subtraction, even in their mother tongue and now they have to start in English from scratch! No wonder schools lose more than half the Grade 1 enrollments before they reach Grade 12! Had they learnt their maths in English they would have been far better off – as long as the curriculum makes provision for them to catch up and the teachers use proper ways of teaching.

There can be no good reason why we should not use words like oxygen, calculus and algebra, if we don’t have our own indigenous names. We talk of computers, cell phones, soccer and taxi without trying to find IsiZulu, isiXhosa or Tswana translations. We will not stop using isiZulu or any other indigenous language because some technical terms are borrowed from English.

Our children are already starting behind, why make it more difficult for them?

Professor Themba Dube, Unisa professor of maths recently made a strong plea in The Star in South Africa for us to borrow these words from English. Students going to study at University will have to master the terminology in any case once. Should we force them to do it twice? So many words and terms do not exist in indigenous languages and we should far rather use the academics we have to teach the students instead of trying to invent thousands of new terms.

We know Afrikaans managed to do it to some extent – but they had access to other Germanic languages like Dutch and German, with strong histories and terms in maths and science, making it dramatically easier. Even so they still have serious backlogs with terminology and many Afrikaans students at school and varsity prefer to rather learn in English as that is the language most widely used in the world of maths, science, research and commerce.

Only if our politicians push and allocate funds for a different approach in EFAL in ECD (early childhood education, i.e. pre-school and Grade R-3) will we start producing the academics, engineers, technicians, doctors in the numbers our country needs.

Debate around language is linked to heritage, self-identity, in an integrated world, we need not to be stuck up on not being flexible, as much as we embrace our mother tongue, we should make sure our children are taught in languages universal to the fields of maths and science.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Writing Without Bullsh*t: An Interview with Josh Bernoff

The state of business writing is generally dismal today. If I had a nickel for every poorly written article or blog post I’ve seen, I’d have quite a few nickels. Passive voice, horrible jargon, and run-on sentences make much if not most text confusing at best and downright inscrutable at worst.

And I’m hardly the only one who feels this way. After the publication of Message Not Received last March, I got to know Josh Bernoff. He’s also determined to improve the way that we write. A few months ago, Josh interviewed me about my own book business communications. I also had the chance to see him speak recently at a conference in Las Vegas.

Today I sit down with him to talk about his forthcoming book Writing Without Bullshit: Boost Your Career by Saying What You Mean. (He sent me an advance copy of it and I blew through it.)

PS: You and I agree that writing today generally sucks. Has this always been the case or has it gotten worse?

JB: It has gotten worse. We are reading and writing 46 hours per day, based on a survey of business writers that I completed this spring. Our inboxes and phone screens are full of content. There is plenty of content flooding in to fill this demand — our bosses, our subordinates, bloggers, social media posts, and news organizations that don’t edit nearly as diligently as they used to. Combine that with short attention spans and you’re besieged with a lot of indifferent, poorly crafted content. So yeah, it sorta sucks.

PS: What do you hope the book will accomplish?

JB: All that awful content is an opportunity. People can write to stand out, rather than to fit in. That means being clear and direct, avoiding jargon, and most of all, getting right to the point, quickly. If you write like this, people will notice you. So my hope is that people reading the book will learn how they can effectively communicate this way. And if enough of them read it, the world of content might actually get a little better.

PS: In the book and on your blog, you especially criticize the use of what you call weasel words. What are they and why do you rail against them?

JB: Weasel words refer to vague adjectives, adverbs, and other words that attempt to qualify or intensify a statement — but actually just make it seem like bullshit. For example, after Verizon agreed to purchase Yahoo, its CEO, Marissa Mayer, wrote an email to her staff that was full of sentences like this (weasel words highlighted): “Joining forces with AOL and Verizon will help us achieve tremendous scale on mobile. Imagine the distribution challenges we will solve, the scale we will achieve, the products we will build, and the advertisers we will reach now with Mavens – it’s incredibly compelling.” By going over the top with “tremendous” and “incredibly,” she loses all credibility. You can’t write without words like “very” and “mostly,” but writers who want to be believable ought to purge as many of them as possible.

PS: In your book you discuss the concept of flow. I couldn’t agree with you more. For those unfamiliar with it, though, can you explain it? Why is it essential for effective writing?

JB: Flow is a concept discovered by the brilliant psychologist Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. It refers to a state in which you’re working steadily against resistance, but with the skill to solve problems and make rapid progress. Workers in a flow state are far more productive. For writers, flow creates fluid writing that hangs together — and it feels great. To get to flow, writers have to do all the research ahead of time (so they won’t have to interrupt themselves or have holes in what they create), and they need to set aside uninterrupted time to write. If you write in 5-minute chunks, your writing will be choppy. If you write in 45-minute chunks, with short breaks between, you’re writing will be fluid (and you’ll feel like a winner).

PS: Press releases are often rife with jargon and poorly written. Why are they so consistently terrible?

JB: There are so many reasons. First of all, it’s tradition — you want your release to fit the template, so you copy the other jargon-filled releases. Second, they’re written and approved by committees, so every crams their pet ideas into there. And you want to sound impressive, so you fill them with adjectives and industry buzzwords. Well, guess what. It doesn’t work. Nobody can figure out what you’re saying, and they don’t believe you. I estimate that I received 10,000 press releases in my time as an analyst. Maybe 200 had any relevance to me, and even those were 80% fluff. Press releases are a billion-dollar industry that creates 99% waste.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.