China isn't America, but sometimes they look a Bit Alike

BEIJING–I was speaking to a Chinese high school student hoping to attend college in America. We were talking about the application process and possible essay topics. He mentioned the championship basketball game in which he missed the last shot and his team lost by a point. He was devastated.

What did his parents think, I asked? “They told me it was just a game,” he responded.

What could be more American? Playing basketball, losing the big game, and having your folks respond to teen angst with adult logic. Americans and Chinese are living a common human experience, despite all the obvious differences politically, historically, and culturally.

In important ways China, still officially known as “the People’s Republic of China,” is a grimmer place today than when I visited last year. President Xi Jinping, whose father suffered under Mao, is making others suffer today. A brutal and sustained crackdown is underway on academics, human rights activists, journalists, lawyers, and everyone else who dare stand for individual liberty.

In a throwback to the Cultural Revolution which afflicted Xi pere, attorneys were recently dragged into court to publicly apologize for all sort of offenses against the state–because they previously defended people arrested for political “crimes.” It was like the old Communist Party “self-criticism” sessions, with hapless victims sitting in dunce caps surrounded by Red Guards denouncing “capitalist-roaders.” In fact, there is nervous talk of Xi as the new Mao, though some wonder if he might be in unexpected political danger having accumulated so many enemies.

Yet for those who ignore politics life goes on largely unchanged. For instance, Chinese university students are patriots, but also thirst for knowledge. In July I joined a motley libertarian crew to speak on economics at a Chinese university. Out of respect for our hosts we eschewed topics that could cause undue controversy, but we had many spirited economics discussions. Ironically, the week-long “summer camp” was held in the school of Marxist economics. While not all the students were convinced by all our arguments–just like in America!–the majority recognized the importance of allowing private markets to work while protecting people’s right to private property. They also were uniformly warm personally, irrespective of what they thought of U.S. government policies. These sessions give me hope for the future.

Beijing is not China, a vast, diverse land with quadruple America’s population but great poverty within. However, Beijing is one of China’s great portals for the West, and illustrates how Western culture is more powerful in its own way than the American military.

The PRC’s capital is a sprawling metropolis, ever bigger and busier. It doesn’t look like it tops a communist country. Indeed, one wonders what Mao Zedong would think if he arose from his massive mausoleum in Tiananmen Square and joined a tour group. Almost certainly he would be horrified, since the transformation demonstrates how malign his rule was. Freed of the bondage he imposed on them, the Chinese people have created a world class city.

The urban core has a skyline. It’s not as dramatic, even flamboyant, as that of Shanghai, the country’s financial center. But Beijing is nothing like Washington, D.C., where no building rises higher than the Washington Monument.

Politics is overpowering, especially in the area near Tiananmen Square, including Zhongnanhai, where the governing elite lives in secure seclusion. Nevertheless, there is little sign of communist ideology throughout most of Beijing. The city sports abundant history, culture, and, of course, commerce. Modern bank and other corporate buildings abound. The streets are filled with Western autos, often causing traffic jams of which Los Angeles would be proud. Advertising sells Western products.

If you need something simple, visit a 7-11. But why stop there? In the capital of Chinese “socialism” private shops abound. Better (or worse, depending on your perspective), the city representing the triumph of the peasantry hosts the full range of luxury shops. Want designer goods or clothes, some fine jewelry, or that special car? No problem. A friend of mine drives a Mercedes. But that is commonplace. Drop by a trendy nightclub and you’re likely to see the parking lot filled with autos few Americans can afford–Lamborghinis, Ferraris, and other vehicles suggesting a decidedly non-communist outlook.

People dress Western. Forget Mao’s faux peasant garb. (Maybe he thought looking like a commoner excused murdering tens of millions of them!) Designer wear helps define the elite. With the ongoing crackdown on corruption–at least, corruption among those on the political outs with President Xi–ostentation is more restrained, but hardly gone.

However, most Chinese, like most Americans, don’t live the high life. It was hot in July, though not as bad as in Washington, D.C., which I escaped for China. Shorts, ranging from athletic to Bermuda, were de rigueur, along with jeans and sweat pants. Footwear was a mix of running shoes, sandals, and flip-flops. T-shirts, many displaying English-language content, were common. Baseball caps dotted heads in a land where the American sport of choice is basketball.

Business is conducted in a Western suit. Actually, this is one area where I’m disappointed that communism has proved to be a complete bust. What’s wrong with a simple and light peasant outfit, especially sans tie? I’ve been wondering how I can start a Chinese movement that associates suits with counter-revolution.

Once one imagined most Chinese being short. Nutrition matters: on average, South Koreans are a few inches taller than North Koreans. But as the widespread interest in basketball demonstrates, plenty of Chinese loom over the average American. It’s still a little jarring to see a Chinese youth north of six feet, but ever more will venture out in the world.

Just as tattoos have become common among younger Americans, you see them increasingly on Chinese as well. There’s also graffiti, which I’ve always viewed as a form of urban tattoos. I have no idea what it says–perhaps “We love Xi Jinping.” Still, I rather doubt it.

If anything proves the dominance of American culture it is pervasive English labeling. I admire the English-speaking Chinese with whom I deal. It has to be as difficult to go from symbols to alphabet as the other way. I can tell the Chinese characters are different, but have no sense of the patterns or what to look for to distinguish one from another. But it’s getting ever easier for an English speaker in Beijing and other big cities, at least. Signs proclaim “24 hour bank,” “nail salon,” “stylish haircuts,” and, of course, “massage.”

Another sign of globalization, or blight in the view of some, is the spread of U.S. fast food restaurants. Want McDonald’s, Pizza Hut, or KFC? No problem. They aren’t particularly cheap by Chinese standards. But for an adventurous Chinese citizen or Western visitor desperate for a taste of home, they satisfy.

And while no self-respecting Chinese diner would be caught using Western utensils, most better restaurants have the latter for helpless visitors. Indeed, in many eateries the staff automatically brings a fork and knife to anyone with a Western face. I was proud to use chopsticks–quite competently, after so many visits to Asia, I hasten to add! But imagine the typical Washington restaurant keeping a stock of chopsticks for Chinese visitors. It ain’t likely.

Living in a country which has gone through such wrenching change (China was only just emerging from the horrific Cultural Revolution 40 years ago) may make people more receptive to innovation. Uber has been involved in a bitter battle to gain market share in the Chinese market. It announced a merger with a much larger domestic competitor while I was visiting Beijing, essentially surrendering. But many Chinese as well as foreign expats now are as comfortable ordering a car online as hailing a cab.

The iPhone and its competitors have captured China as thoroughly as the rest of the world. Speaking to a university class leaves one looking out at kids getting online or texting friends. But it’s hard to complain. If they come upon a difficult word while talking with you they whip out their phone and pull up a translation.

Lots of Chinese youth hope to study in America. A small but increasing number are forgoing the grueling “Gaokao,” which determines which Chinese university they can attend, instead studying for the SAT or ACT, and English-proficiency TOEFL. An entire industry has sprung up to help kids prepare for and apply to U.S. colleges. A close friend works for one of the companies, UFEIC (University Foundation Education Instruction Center), and had me stop by to chat with some university-bound students. They also impressed me.

Like their American counterparts, they are worried about jobs. While it’s tough for university grads here to find something commensurate with their education, it’s even harder in China. Speaking English, studying abroad, and understanding foreign cultures all give them a leg up.

In general, Chinese students want to meet Americans, but not become Americans. They like Western-style liberties–I’ve yet to meet a Chinese kid who is happy that President Xi essentially decides what can be seen and said on the internet. But they love their people’s history, believe in their country, and are rabid nationalists. Taiwan is part of China, and that’s it. China owns everything in the South China Sea. No question. Even more so, wanting to go to the U.S. doesn’t mean wanting Washington to boss their country around.

Unsurprisingly, many feel pushed. Parental expectations are as great if not greater in China. The culture emphasizes filial piety, creating helicopter parents of the worst sort. On this trip one concerned mother dragged her high school daughter to lunch with me and my friend who works to help kids study abroad. Mom even insisted on accompanying us on a museum visit. It was strained all around, but she was determined to give her child every advantage, including, apparently, hanging out with a couple much older English-speakers from the West.

Still, an increasing number say their folks’ advice is to find what makes them happy. Moreover, with the end of the one-child policy I’ve started to see an occasional family with more than one kid. Overall fertility levels haven’t changed much. But regaining this important aspect of human liberty–though more than two still is verboten–is a vital change.

One of the strangest aspects of visiting China always has been the absence of families with multiple children. You never saw a mom struggling to both carry a baby and manage a toddler, or father with a couple tweens in tow. There was only one kid, which even Chinese acknowledged usually was treated like royalty by his or her parents and two sets of grandparents.

Unfortunately, perhaps under U.S. encouragement China is picking up some of Washington’s worst habits. No surprise, the PRC has its equivalent of the TSA. I’ve rarely found Chinese employees to be much different than their American counterparts. They unenthusiastically perform boring tasks which seem only vaguely related to protecting travelers from murderous hijackers.

This time I ended up choosing the wrong line. The scanning machine operator was the anal sort who took twice as long as the fellow one line over in looking at everything–and flagged virtually every bag to be emptied, with both bag and contents sent back through the machine for a second go. The line barely inched along. Both my carry-ons were thus treated, leading to a double interrogation by another, English-challenged, security guy. As I was repacking my bags they closed the lane, as if it had been a set up just to punish me for snickering every time I saw an image of Mao. I departed damning TSA for forcing its standards on the rest of the world.

It’s always exciting to visit the PRC. But it is most interesting to learn about China, which is vastly larger, more complex, and humane than the nominal communist state which still rules. It’s impossible to predict what China will ultimately become. Most important is that it becomes free, consigning today’s authoritarian regime to history’s dustbin. Then the people of China will be able to decide their own future.

This article originally appeared in Forbes online.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

5 Things To Retire From Your Closet When YOU Retire

No, this isn’t going to be one of those lists that tells you what you are too old to wear. Our feeling is, if you like something, wear it. If anyone calls it not age appropriate, just tell them you are actually only 24 but haven’t aged all that well.

But there are some things that should retire from your closet along with you. Feel free to add any other items you can think of in the comments below.

1. Bras that you ripped off the minute you got home from work.

We’re not sure why you were wearing them all day anyway, but if you begin unhooking them on the car ride home, they are definitely candidates for the thrift store. 

Underwire bras were invented by a misogynist. Actually they were invented by Howard Hughes for sweater girl-actress Jane Russell to wear in the movie, “The Outlaw.” Hughes’ previous experience ― and perhaps only qualification for the creation of the push-up bra ― was that he designed airplanes. Steel and breasts are the oil-and-water of fashion.

Upon retirement, you should also lose any bras that close in the back and require you to wriggle and squirm to get them on. And it goes without saying that any bra that causes shoulder or back pain deserves to be burned, circa 1962-style.

2. High heels.

There is an excellent chance that a smart woman like yourself long ago kept her heels under her desk and slipped them on on an as-needed basis, spending the rest of the day in flats. 

But chances are, you still have the heels. Sure your niece’s wedding is coming up a year from February, but you will no more want to wear them then than you do now.

Dump the high heels. Dump the low ones too. Make your tootsies happy.

3. The office sweater.

You know the one that has hung on the back of your chair for years because the air conditioning never works right? In case you were wondering, office air conditioners are set for the comfort level of men, not women ― science says!

With fond memories of how you spent menopausal days taking it off and putting it back on, now just put it in the Goodwill pile.

 

4. The second set of everything.

In your desk drawer or job locker, there is a good chance you have a second comb and brush, a complete set of makeup including face wash and moisturizer, a toothbrush and toothpaste and probably even dental floss.

Your workplace has been your second home. Time to liberate yourself, bring  what you want to your real home and just heave the rest of it into the trash.

5. The non-Mom jeans you bought for casual Fridays.

Maybe they were skinny jeans or super skinny jeans or low-waisted-barely-covering-your-butt-crack jeans. In any case, they were whatever jeans that were trending at the time of purchase. We applaud the valiant effort on your part to fit into the corporate culture. Bet you even hit up the beer taps once just to show you could. But as far as the jeans go, long ago you figured out which brand and style was the most comfortable.

The thing about jeans is that your favorite pair are the only ones you ever really want to wear. Keep those and bag up the rest.

As for the rest of the usual suspects ― shorts for the company picnic, a bikini for the office pool party, pony tail holders for the days you didn’t have time to wash your hair? You have our blessing to wear and not wear whatever you want. Fools, be damned.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

How Your Attitude About Aging Can Add Years To Your Life

In the mid 2000s, Irene Sinclair’s face adorned advertisements and billboards throughout the UK. As part of the Campaign for Real Beauty developed by Dove, the 96-year-old great grandmother was chosen to help challenge conventional thinking about beauty.

2016-08-28-1472412099-9329323-SuccessfulAging_LifetimeDaily.jpg

The award-winning campaign about positive aging was a tremendous success. Dove tapped into society’s negative expectations of aging, and asked people to reconsider them.

The British public was asked to cast its votes as to whether they thought Sinclair was “wrinkled” or “wonderful.” The public cast 31,000 votes, 23,000 of which were for “wonderful.” Fast forward to 2016.

Women well beyond 65 are the new “It-Girls” for a myriad of youth-centric brands. Consider 94-year-old fashion icon Iris Apfel for MAC Cosmetics. Even the iconic French fashion house Céline has come on board, featuring 80-year-old writer Joan Didion in a recent ad campaign.

All this begs the question: is aging being cast in a new, more positive light? 

AARP’s research seems to support this changing point of view. According to their findings, 85 percent of survey respondents, ages 40-90, don’t see themselves as old. Even my 104-year-old grandmother talks about those old people.

But don’t get too excited. A social research study conducted by Pfizer shows we still have a ways to go. The study revealed that 62 percent of the 4.2 million Tweets about aging (in the last 12 months) were negative.

I can hear you now. Why does all of this have to do with you? The answer is simple: your attitude about aging can add years to your life.

Past research has found that people with a positive perception of aging will outlive negative thinkers by 7½ years. Positive thinkers achieve better health and cognitive capabilities, and they maintain independence longer than their negative counterparts.

So How Do You Change?

A lot books have been written on the topic.

Live Long, Die Short, A Guide to Authentic Health (find it here) and Keep Moving: And Other Tips and Truths About Aging (find it here) are two books I recommend often.

Also, consider the next three tips:

1. Embrace Your Untapped Potential

The fact is, most of us have abilities that we’ve yet to realize. Embracing these with a “can do” attitude will change your life.

A great example of this is Fauja Singh. Born in 1911, Singh picked up distance running at the age of 89. His positive thinking saw him celebrate his 100th birthday by crossing the finish line at the Toronto Marathon. Like Singh, how can you embrace untapped potential?

2. Reframe Your Response

Life’s journey is filled with challenges, but how you view and respond to these is key. If you can’t run, walk. If you lack energy, exercise. You may be saying you’re too tired to exercise. On the other hand, if you exercise, you won’t be so tired.

Don’t let aches and pains slow you down — being active will reduce their impact. Build a foundation for positive thinking by creating a list of all the things you say you can’t do, then set out to establish how you can do them.

3. Think for Yourself

“You’re too old to do that.”

This is a comment many of us hear from loved ones, colleagues, professionals, friends and family members. Although well intentioned, comments like this can have a negative impact on self-confidence. By applying the first two tips, you’ll be in a better place to discard or ignore deflating comments and to make decisions based on your capabilities and health, not other people’s thinking.

In the end, aging happens to us all. It’s time to get over the fear of it and move on with living. Your quality of life depends on it.

Colin Milner is CEO of the International Council on Active Aging and a leading authority on the health and well-being of the older adult. For the past six years, the World Economic Forum has invited him to serve on its Network of Global Agenda Councils, recognizing him as one of “the most innovative and influential minds” in the world on aging-related topics.

Earlier on Huff/Post50:

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

The 2 Biggest Things Trump Supporters Have Wrong

2016-08-29-1472480705-5792803-natrumpwomen20L1448149506.jpg

Life in the Boomer Lane has spent quite some time now, being pummeled by the behavior of Donald Trump. She has listened to one Trumper after another explain why he’s their guy. She has heard two themes over and over: The fist is that Trump is a successful businessman/He is rich. He will do for us what he did for himself. The second is: He’s not a politician. He says what he means and he means what he says. We can trust him. She now addresses these two main themes that have his followers in lock step.

“He is a successful businessman/He is rich. He will do for us what he did for himself.”

“He is a successful businessman/He is rich.” The fact is that Trump is rich. Very, very rich, although in the absence of tax returns we don’t know what he is actually worth. His empire was financed by a huge inheritance and steamrolled by practices that have resulted in countless lawsuits alleging discrimination, and non-payment of fees to contractors and workers. He has declared bankruptcies, resulting in employees, workers and investors not being paid. He has made money, not from building but from leasing his name to numerous building projects. The bottom line is that, had Trump invested his inheritance and done nothing more than that, he would be worth more than he is now. In other words, his fortune has actually been diminished by his business abilities.

“He will do for us what he did for himself.”At no point in the decades in which he has been a builder has he made any decision that has benefitted minorities or people of lesser means. He has established a foundation, and has contributed a mere pittance of his own money into it. He has not used his political clout to advance worker’s rights, women’s rights, or the rights of minorities. He has hired women simply because they make money for him. He has hired minorities simply because they make money for him. In other words, his power has been used solely for his own self-enrichment.

“He’s not a politician. He says what he means and he means what he says. For that reason, we can trust him.”

“Trump isn’t a politician.” True. But he has supported politicians across the board, not because he believed in what they stood for, but, in his own words, because it was good for his business. In other words, his politics came down to what benefitted him.

“He says what he means and he means what he says.” Trump certainly isn’t shy about saying what he means. The issue is that what he says either changes moment-to-moment, or he uses words that can be taken in a variety of ways. His communication skills are either extremely limited, or he reacts to events around him in the moment, with little thought. The greatest consistency he has shown has been his immediate knee-jerk reaction to anyone who he believes has personally disrespected him. In other words, Trump’s belief system is built solely on a foundation of self-protection and self-promotion.

“For that reason, we can trust him.” Trust is the foundation of any relationship, whether it be love, family, friendship, business. It’s a matter of public record that Trump has violated the trust of ex-wives, workers, investors, and the public.

His much-self-touted book, The Art of the Deal has been found to be a fabrication. The medical letter he submitted to show the status of his health has been found to be a fabrication. People who track such things have noted that he utters an untruth at the rate of one every five minutes. Trump says what he wants to hear, with little or no regard for reality. His standard of truth has always been himself.

LBL knows that this post won’t change the minds of even a single Trump supporter. She simply wants to use one recent example to show what Trump is all about. His campaign headquarters are in Trump Tower. The monthly rent he charges his own campaign to occupy that space is now $169,758, up four times the amount it was four months ago. In effect, his campaign fund is putting money into his own pocket.

His supporters will say “Bravo to him! This shows what a brilliant businessman he is!” LBL has a different take. She sees, instead, a man whose entire life has been about one thing only: his own self-enrichment. He is devoted solely to the deal and what he can get out of it. The United States is now his goal, the biggest and wealthiest deal of his life. His ardent supporters will find that, if Trump has his way and wins this ultimate deal, it will be them who pay the price.

Earlier on Huff/Post50:

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

North Korea Fires Three Ballistic Missiles As G20 Leaders Meet In China

By Ju-min Park

SEOUL (Reuters) – North Korea fired three ballistic missiles into the sea off its east coast on Monday, South Korea’s military said, as the leaders of the Group of 20 major economies held a summit in China, the North’s main diplomatic ally.

The missiles were fired from a region south of the capital Pyongyang just after noon local time (0300 GMT) and flew about 1,000 km (600 miles), hitting Japan’s air defense identification zone, the South’s Office of the Joint Chiefs of Staff said.

“We are still analyzing details but this is a grave threat to our nation’s security, and we express deep concern,” the Japan Defence Ministry said in a statement.

The missile launches were the latest in a series of launches by the isolated North this year in violation of U.N. Security Council resolutions, supported by China, that ban all ballistic missile-related activities by the North.

Pyongyang rejects the ban as infringing its sovereign right to pursue a space program and self defense.

Shortly after the missile launches, South Korean President Park Geun-hye and Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe met on the sidelines of the G20 summit and agreed to cooperate on monitoring the situation, a Japanese statement said.

The South’s military said the missiles were medium-range Rodong-class, launched as a show of force timed to coincide with the G20 summit.

In 2014, the North fired two Rodong medium-range missiles just as Park and Abe were meeting U.S. President Barack Obama at the Hague to discuss responding to the North’s arms program.

The latest missiles were launched from a region called Hwangju and came just hours after the leaders of South Korea and China met on the sidelines of the G20 summit in Hangzhou, China.

South Korea’s Park told Chinese President Xi Jinping that the North’s fourth nuclear test and its ballistic missile launches this year threatened regional peace and posed a challenge to SouthKorea’s ties with China, Yonhap news agency reported earlier.

During the meeting, Xi reaffirmed China’s commitment to realizing the denuclearization of theKorean peninsula, China’s state news agency Xinhua reported on Monday.

Xi also told Park that Beijing opposed the proposed deployment of a THAAD anti-missile system in South Korea, which Seoul and the United States have said is designed to counter an increasing missile threat from North Korea.

Park said that a THAAD deployment would not threaten any other country’s security interests and would not be needed if the North’s nuclear issue was resolved, Yonhap news agency said.

In July, the North launched three missiles in a single day from the western region that flew across the country and into the sea off its east coast, flying about 500 km and 600 km (300-360 miles).

 

 

(Additional reporting by Nobuhiro Kubo in TOKYO; Writing by Jack Kim; Editing by Tony Munroe and Michael Perry)

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Samsung C-Labs’ Welt smart belt goes live on Kickstarter

38eb1f81b18e8adf475213f6fa75c808_originalAt CES early this year, Samsung’s newly formed Creative Labs showcased a few concept smart products, and one of the most curious was a smart belt called Welt. Curious partly because of its perhaps poorly chosen name, and partly because it embodies the ultimate dream of wearable devices: an inconspicuous piece of clothing or fashion made smarter. Now the team … Continue reading

Microsoft and Mercedes bring your office calendar to your car

You can’t always escape work when you’re in your car, but Microsoft and Mercedes-Benz think they can at least make those corporate invasions more tolerable. They’re working together on an In Car Office project that, to start with, will integrate your…

How agriculture can be intensified in Africa without causing harm

2016-09-05-1473070151-2226409-agri.jpg

Tawanda Marandure, Stellenbosch University and Kennedy Dzama, Stellenbosch University

Sustainable agriculture is a popular concept. It’s warmly embraced as a guiding light for the future of food production. But there is still a great deal of disagreement about what the concept actually means and entails.

There is broad agreement about what sustainable agriculture’s main aim should be. It ought to optimise locally available natural resources without negatively affecting the resource base. Social integrity is also a priority. For example, the welfare of animals and labourers should be taken care of.

Here’s the Sustainable Agricultural Institute’s definition:

… adopting productive, competitive and efficient production practices, while maintaining or improving the natural environment and the global ecosystem, as well as the socioeconomic conditions of local communities.

Conventional agriculture differs. It aims to maximise yields and economic returns. This is often done with little regard for the environment and the impact on society. Sustainable agriculture, on the other hand, is designed to address problems like environmental pollution from excessive use of fertilisers. It also tries to arrest the collapse of farm economies because of rising production costs and to preserve social integrity.

Intensive agriculture
is nevertheless expected to increase because of population growth and greater demand for food as incomes rise. But unless agricultural intensification incorporates sustainable practices, environmental and social problems will persist.

We believe that it’s possible to increase production without doing harm. This involves a process of sustainable intensification.

How to intensify without doing damage

Sustainable intensification envisages increasing productivity while decreasing the agriculture’s negative impact on the environment.

This approach to farming was initially aimed at smallholders in developing countries. But the concept has now been widely adopted by other agrarian sectors.

In addition, agriculture in Africa is better positioned to adopt the key tenets of increasing production without causing undue harm. This is because agriculture on the continent has generally been less intensive. It has always incorporated aspects of sustainability practices.


Agriculture in Africa has always incorporated aspects of sustainability practices.
Shutterstock

For example, very few chemicals have been used. There have been higher levels of social integrity including environmental protection, economic viability and social integrity. This can be seen from the fact that African farmers have always employed practices like crop rotation and inter-cropping. These were initially dismissed in favour of monoculture and plantation agriculture as colonialism took hold.

The difficulty of measuring success

Various tools have been developed to assess progress towards sustainable agriculture. But a lack of agreement about what should be measured, and how, has led to a great deal of confusion and frustration, particularly for farmers. It has also left consumers unsure about what really constitutes sustainable agricultural production.

But agricultural systems are complex and diverse. This makes the use of a single blueprint for assessment impractical. Nevertheless, success can be measured by using appropriate environmental, economic and social parameters. These can give an indication of whether certain trends are stabilising, rising or declining.

The three most important dimensions to measure are environmental protection, economic viability and social equity.

But all will be affected by location, production system, scale of operation and time of assessment. Measuring nitrogen balance – the measure of nitrogen input through fertiliser minus output through crop uptake – is a good example. This is an important environmental indicator in field crops but not as much in greenhouses.

Looking at the problem from different angles

For any indicators to work properly they need to involve researchers as well as local farmers. But adopting the appropriate principles and technologies requires an interdisciplinary view. Unfortunately, agricultural training institutions in Africa limit graduates to single disciplines. Academic institutions need programmes that break away from this.

It is also vital to synchronise assessment tools across all production systems. Agricultural production is just one component of the food system. It also includes food transportation, distribution, processing, trade, policy, consumption and food waste production.

Sustainability assessments must cover the entire food system. It requires a diverse team of experts from different disciplines. But to achieve this two problems need to be overcome: tensions between disciplines and the cost of bringing experts together. One solution is to develop training programmes that produce researchers with expertise across a variety of fields.

If these problems can be solved it will see Africa take the lead in the drive to achieve sustainable agriculture.

The Conversation

Tawanda Marandure, PhD student Theoretical Production Ecology, Agricultural Philosophy, Animal Science, Stellenbosch University and Kennedy Dzama, Head of Department / Professor: Animal Breeding, Stellenbosch University

This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Women in Business Q&A: Elisa Steele, CEO, Jive Software

2016-09-05-1473070640-5610226-ElisaSteeleheadshot.jpg
Elisa Steele

Elisa Steele is the CEO of Jive Software, a leading provider of modern communication and collaboration solutions for businesses. Elisa is passionate about helping businesses embrace technology and creating people-centric strategies for competitive advantage. A Silicon Valley veteran, Elisa’s leadership spans her early days spearheading sales at AT&T to the marketing C-suite, leading global marketing at technology companies including Yahoo!, Skype, and Microsoft. Prior to her role as CEO at Jive, she served as the company’s CMO and was responsible for its brand vision and end-to-end global marketing and product functions. After being appointed to CEO, Elisa strengthened Jive’s leadership bench and orchestrated the roll out of a new portfolio of workstyle apps to meet the needs of the mobile enterprises. Under her tenure, Jive continues to secure customers across verticals and market-size, including Virgin Media, GoDaddy, the Portland Trailblazers, SunEdison, and Sysomos, and is redefining how businesses and people work together for the better.

Outside of work, Elisa currently serves on the Board of Directors for Amber Alert GPS and is an innovation advisor to the non-profit organization, Equality Now. She previously served on the board of directors of RMG Networks, the advisory board to consumer companies CareZone and Eyeona, the Interactive Advertising Bureau board of directors and executive committee from 2009-2011, and the Forbes Executive Women advisory board. In 2009, Advertising Age named Elisa a “Woman to Watch.” She is currently a member and volunteer for National Charity League and donates time and resources in her local school community.

She lives in Los Gatos, California with her two teenagers and husband of more than 20 years.

How has your life experience made you the leader you are today?
I’ve always had the desire to do work with people I care about, serve customers and do something meaningful in my career. At first it wasn’t about a specific career path necessarily – it was more about performing at my best and being a part of a team with a clear, exciting mission. Whether it was school, work or community, I’ve always been focused on connecting people and ideas together.

How has your previous employment experience aided your tenure at Jive Software?
My best employment experiences were at companies where I truly lived what they develop and sell. Skype and Jive had that in common for me. At Skype, I used the product as part of my everyday life experience, and cared deeply about it. I could genuinely relate to what the brand was all about — and what it needed to be for people. It is very similar at Jive because I was a previous customer who used the product to connect and unite employees. I already knew the incredible impact it can have for teams, functions and leaders — and how it truly empowers people to work better together. I felt connected and committed before I even walked in the door.

What have the highlights and challenges been during your tenure at Jive Software?
The highlight for me is that I use Jive everyday to connect with my employees, talk to my customers and run the company. I can’t imagine how we would work without it! We use it to get our work done and constantly push the limits of its capabilities, and how it can fulfill even more for people.

The challenges are the same for any business passionate about succeeding: How do you keep your customers as happy as possible? How do you add new customers who value the same great benefits that you know you can deliver? And, how do you continue to grow with the right team and people in our ever-changing world?

What I absolutely love about Jive is that our customers are the biggest advocates for Jive and what it means for them and their businesses. Of course, our Jivers are committed and passionate about the product, but we really receive our inspiration from how our customers use it, and how they share the amazing results they realize in their companies: The connection with people, the collaborative environment -it’s instilled in their culture, along with the ability to simply work better together. We’re inspired every day by our customers – such as Cisco, Google, GoDaddy, MapR, NBCUniversal, the Portland Trailblazers, Starwood Hotel & Resorts and the US Department of Veterans Affairs – and how with Jive, they’ve made their businesses more productive, more connected and more modern.

What advice can you offer to women who want a career in your industry?
I have three key pieces of advice that I’ve always lived by. First and foremost, be passionate: Don’t try to have a career in an industry you don’t care about. It just won’t work. Next, Listen: Learn from those around you as you develop your own perspective and beliefs. Lastly, I believe it’s critical to always do your homework and be prepared. Be the person in the room who is ready; it won’t go unnoticed.

What is the most important lesson you’ve learned in your career to date?
You never stop learning. No matter how many situations you’ve managed, you have never fully learned all that there is to know. Be flexible, be open and be a great listener.

How do you maintain a work/life balance?
Ha! I don’t believe in work-life balance. Life is just life! Work plays a big part, but so does family, friends, community, and all the other things that are important to you. I’m a career-minded person so work will always be a part of my life.

What do you think is the biggest issue for women in the workplace?
Opportunity! There is no one way forward – women need more opportunities to be exposed to more options, more choices, more chances.

How has mentorship made a difference in your professional and personal life?
I think mentorship is the most the most important thing that makes a difference for advancement and growth. It can happen everyday without mass programs, more funding and more time in the day. It can make a difference right now. Any man and/or any woman in business can make a door open for another. And you can do it right now.

It has made a difference to me in my career to have both men and women provide insight, opportunities and roles that have helped me grow and develop as a leader. Without them my path would have been different for sure.

Which other female leaders do you admire and why?
I admire all female leaders who are pursuing their passions, tackling obstacles and not letting anyone deviate them from the path that they want to take. Hats off to all women who continue to make a difference.

What do you want Jive to accomplish in the next year?
I want the benefits of what our customers report to us to be more widely understood and adopted by other businesses that have not found a better way to work.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Donald Trump Gets A Forrest Gump Makeover In Biting TV Sketch

Forrest Trump just keeps on running (for president).

Satirical British television show “Newzoids” mercilessly mocked Donald Trump over the weekend in a hilarious “Forrest Gump”-themed puppet/CGI sketch.

It gave Tom Hanks’ lovable fictional character a full Trump makeover for the clip, which first aired on the main network channel ITV on Saturday ― turning him into “a man everyone thought was a racist simpleton, who showed the world they were absolutely right.”

Poking fun at the GOP presidential candidate’s vow to build a wall between the United States and Mexico, they also explored his friendship with right-wing “Brexit” movement leader Nigel Farage.

Check it out in the clip above. 

Editor’s note: Donald Trump regularly incites political violence and is a serial liarrampant xenophoberacistmisogynist and birther who has repeatedly pledged to ban all Muslims — 1.6 billion members of an entire religion — from entering the U.S.

type=type=RelatedArticlesblockTitle=Related Coverage + articlesList=57ca72d8e4b0e60d31df4a38,56cae793e4b0ec6725e3168f,571605e0e4b0018f9cbaff03

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.