An Open Letter To Colin Kaepernick

Dear Colin,

My mother was a Native American woman from Tennessee. My father was a black man from Louisiana. As a child I lived and breathed the Jim Crow South. I felt the gnaw of institutional and legalized oppression. I navigated town streets with the ever-present admonition to walk right, look away and know my place.

Nevertheless, I would never sit during the National Anthem. I would never slouch during the National Anthem. I would never stand silently during the National Anthem. As long as I have breath in my body and blood in my veins, I will stand and sing the Star Spangled Banner. This country has oppressed people of color and does oppress people of color, but it also offers the machinery for all of us to improve not only ourselves but also the American Republic as a whole. That is the American Experiment.

As I have said before, the best way to improve this Republic is by joining the discourse not by slinking away from it. When hard working citizens got tired of government waste they created the Tea Party. When heartbroken mothers lost their children to police violence, they formed Black Lives Matter. When young people across the nation grew tired of politics as usual they felt the Bern. You may agree with these people and their ideas, you may disagree with these people and their ideas, you may be indifferent to these people and their ideas. You must, however, recognize and respect their willingness to engage in the political process to correct the ills that they see in the world.

A lot of Americans have bled, suffered and died defending the promise celebrated by our National Anthem. They did so on the fields of Gettysburg, on the streets of Selma and in the mountains of Afghanistan. You have a First Amendment right to be silent during the Star Spangled Banner because of their sacrifice.

Our country is in a bad place right now. We are the most divided we have been since I walked the streets of Knoxville as a young girl. But one thing that binds all of us together is the privilege and responsibility to engage in the American Experiment. Raise your voice whether by joining the political process, supporting candidates that you believe in or just voting. During the last presidential election, only 57 percent of the nation voted for the most powerful office on the planet. 43 percent of voters abandoned the most essential means of expression in a democracy and surrendered a freedom that has no enemy in our history, whether foreign or domestic, has ever taken from us. They sat on the sideline without realizing the cruel reality that an oppressor’s greatest ally is the apathy of the oppressed.

Are you upset? Are you angry? Are you sick and tired and scared? If so the answer is joining the political process. It is not sitting on the sideline like a spoiled child and refusing to stand until “this country is representing people the way it’s supposed to…”

Does not standing for our National Anthem qualify as expression? Of course and this expression is protected by the First Amendment. The problem now is not awareness, however, but inaction. By sitting on the sideline during the National Anthem, you disgraced the country that made you rich and keeps you safe. Perhaps more importantly, you told your fans that the best action for correcting oppression is inaction. From American isolationism during the outbreak of the Second World War to John Mayer’s “Waiting for the World to Change,” history categorically demonstrates that this is wrong.

If you want to fix oppression, Colin, I implore you to join the political process. You could contribute to a candidate or a cause that opposes oppression. You could rent buses to take indigent voters to the polls. You could even fund community outreach programs to teach disadvantaged people about how to engage in the democratic process and have their voices heard. You could do myriad things that are actually effective rather than merely divisive and disrespectful.

In a matter of weeks, this whole scandal will blow over and you will be sitting on the sideline for other reasons. I hope that you still oppose the oppression in all of its forms. I pray, however, that you will fight it more rationally, productively and nobly.

Sincerely,

Lauren Harris

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Good Samaritans Rescue Stray Dog From A Ridiculously Tight Spot

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

All’s well that ends well.

After a stray dog got trapped inside a storm drain in northern Peru, good Samaritans came to her rescue and set her free.

The hungry canine, who’s since been named Nikki, was scavenging for food in a sewer tunnel in the San Martin region when she poked her head through a tiny hole in the wall and became stuck, Peruvian newspaper La República reports.

Local residents spotted the dog’s head poking out into the street and gave her food and water, while figuring out how best to free her from her tricky predicament. 

Video posted online shows locals and police first using a shovel to try to dig out some extra space under her head. When that didn’t work, they used a power drill to widen the hole.

The dog was soon freed and, after being lifted out of the sewer, walked off as if nothing had happened. The animal was later captured and found not to have suffered any injuries from the incident.

It’s not clear what has happened to Nikki since her rescue, but with her story now making headlines around the world, we hope this pup will have no trouble finding a forever home.

type=type=RelatedArticlesblockTitle=Related Coverage + articlesList=57c56dbfe4b0cdfc5ac90c02,55fc37f6e4b00310edf6c725,562da833e4b0aac0b8fd4f43

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Notre Dame, Ohio State Are College Football's Priciest Teams In 2016

College football fans, rejoice — the 2016 season is officially upon us.

Eight long months have passed since Nick Saban and the Alabama Crimson Tide stormed to a national championship, relying on one of the most memorable onside kicks in college football history to defeat Clemson, 45-40. However, with the Tide fittingly leading the AP Poll out of the gate this season, their title win hasn’t swayed ticket prices on the secondary market. In fact, the team won’t crack the list of most expensive College Football tickets in 2016.

This year’s top honor belongs to Notre Dame, who for the second straight season owns the most expensive college football tickets on the secondary market. TicketIQ, the leading online platform that partners with both primary and secondary market brokers to give consumers the largest ticket inventory to choose from, breaks down this season’s top 15 most expensive schools below:

1) Notre Dame Fighting Irish | 2016 Season Average: $335 | 2015 Season Average: $332 | Year-over-Year Change: +1%

Several key receivers are gone in South Bend this season — Will Fuller, Chris Brown and Amir Carlisle each have new digs in the NFL — but their absence hasn’t affected prices on the resale market. Notre Dame tickets now own a $335 average across all games at Notre Dame Stadium, making the Irish the top-priced team in the league this year.

2) Ohio State Buckeyes | 2016 Season Average: $286 | 2015 Season Average: $198 | Year-over-Year Change: +45%

One year removed from their own national title, the Ohio State Buckeyes had a memorable 2015 season, going 12-1 but failing to reach the College Football Playoff after their sole loss to Michigan State during Week 12. They’ll need to adapt after losing star players Cardale Jones, Zeke Elliot, Braxton Miller and Joey Bosa, but even with the mass exodus of players the Buckeyes again post a massive resale ticket demand in 2016, climbing 45% on average to $286 for games at Ohio Stadium.

3) Georgia Bulldogs | 2016 Season Average: $235 | 2015 Season Average: $234 | Year-over-Year Change: -1%

Despite going unranked in the CFP last season, Georgia will continue to pack house at Sanford Stadium in 2016. The Bulldogs went 10-3 last year, finishing 24th in the Coaches’ Poll. Their biggest storyline this season will be the debut of new head coach Kirby Smart, who takes over after Mark Richt. The average resale price for Georgia tickets in 2016 is $235, the third highest in the nation this season.

4) UCLA Bruins | 2016 Season Average: $232 | 2015 Season Average: $116 | Year-over-Year Change: +100%

Making the biggest jump on the secondary market this season are the UCLA Bruins, whose average ticket price has doubled at the Rose Bowl. 2016 will be a proving grounds type of year for sophomore QB Josh Rosen, and he’ll look to make a splash in head coach Jim Mora’s fifth season in SoCal. UCLA tickets on TicketIQ currently average $232, a massive jump from last year’s average of $116.

5) Tennessee Volunteers | 2016 Season Average: $219 | 2015 Season Average: $199 | Year-over-Year Change: +10%

The preseason rankings say it all for Tennessee. With top 10 ranks in the Coaches’ and Sports Illustrated Poll, there’s reason why the Vols are the fifth most expensive team in the nation this year. Tennessee tickets on the secondary market currently own a $219 average, up 10% from last year’s average of $199.

6) Oklahoma Sooners | 2016 Season Average: $209 | 2015 Season Average: $165 | Year-over-Year Change: +27%

An 11-2 record wasn’t enough to snag the fourth and final CFP spot last year, but such a big season has lead to higher ticket prices in Oklahoma. The Sooners begin the season with a $209 average across all games at Memorial Stadium, up 27% from last year’s average of $165. Heisman Trophy candidate Baker Mayfield returns to lead a stacked offense that includes running back Samaje Perine and ascending receiver Dede Westbrook.

7) Clemson Tigers | 2016 Season Average: $207 | 2015 Season Average: $141 | Year-over-Year Change: +47%

2015 was near-flawless season for Clemson, who fell just shy of perfection against Alabama in the title game. They’ll return with even greater expectations in 2016 and, unlike many other elite teams, will do so with their core still intact. Deshaun Watson, Wayne Gallman and Hunter Renfrow again lead the Tigers in hopes of returning to college football’s biggest stage. Clemson tickets are averaging $207 in 2016, a notable 47% boost from last year’s average of $141.

8) Utah Utes | 2016 Season Average: $187 | 2015 Season Average: $115 | Year-over-Year Change: +63%

Several glaring holes will be filled on offense for Utah this season, including a new quarterback, running back and top receiver. Still, for a program that has consistently grown into a Pac 12 threat over the last four seasons, there’s no reason to believe the Utes won’t have another big year in 2016. The secondary market appears to share a similar sentiment, as Utah tickets have increased 63% on average and are posting a $115 average at Rice Eccles Stadium.

9) Michigan State Spartans | 2016 Season Average: $187 | 2015 Season Average: $104 | Year-over-Year Change: +80%

Favored to repeat as Big Ten East champions, the Michigan State Spartans enter 2016 with a massive increase in ticket prices on the secondary market. The loss of Connor Cook under center hurts, but fans can expect senior Tyler O’Connor to lead the offense to a second straight divisional championship. Michigan State tickets currently average $187 on TicketIQ, up 80% from last season’s average of $104.

10) Texas Longhorns | 2016 Season Average: $176 | 2015 Season Average: $143 | Year-over-Year Change: +23%

It’s no mystery that Texas’ power lies in its ground game, and D’Onta Foreman and Chris Waren III will again be the X factors for the Longhorns this season. They’ll hope to improve on their 5-7 record from a season ago, though it will be a difficult task in a crowded Big 12. Texas tickets currently own a $176 average at Texas Memorial Stadium, a 23% increase from last season’s $143 average.

11) Mississippi Rebels | 2016 Season Average: $172 | 2015 Season Average: $95 | Year-over-Year Change: +81%

Ole Miss will welcome transfer student Chad Kelly this season, who is arguably the most talented QB in the league. Several key players have gone on to the NFL, including receiver Laquon Treadwell and OT Laremy Tunsil, so the Rebels will hope to remain within Top 10 talks as the season progresses. On the secondary market, Ole Miss tickets have increased a whopping 81% on average, climbing from $95 a season ago to $172 in 2016.

12) Florida State Seminoles | 2016 Season Average: $171 | 2015 Season Average: $92 | Year-over-Year Change: +86%

Jimbo Fisher will keep all of his top talent from a season ago in 2016, yet again making FSU a threat to Clemson in the Atlantic division of the ACC. It appears that hype is through the roof for the team, too, as Florida State tickets are averaging $171 in 2016, am 86% increase from last season. Expect Sean Maguire to step up again under center for the Seminoles this season.

13) Michigan Wolverines | 2016 Season Average: $169 | 2015 Season Average: $171 | Year-over-Year Change: -1%

Jim Harbaugh’s presence in Ann Arbor had an immediate impact on the Michigan Wolverines. Harbaugh led the team to a 10-3 season in his first year as head coach, giving Michigan its first double-digit winning season since 2011. The Wolverines return to a packed Big Ten East division that also features Ohio State and Michigan State, so the team will need to make a splash if it hopes to take the division this season. The average resale price for Michigan tickets is $169 this season, barely moving from last year’s average of $171.

14) Iowa Hawkeyes | 2016 Season Average: $169 | 2015 Season Average: $96 | Year-over-Year Change: +76%

Iowa’s dreamlike 2015 season took them all the way to the Big Ten Championship, though the Hawkeyes’ playoff hopes were crushed by Michigan State. Still, such a monumental year has sparked ticket prices at Kinnick Stadium in 2016, and Iowa tickets have increased 76% on average from $96 to $169. 12 consecutive wins is difficult to predict for any team, but Iowa has the muscle to make 2016 another big year.

15) USC Trojans | 2016 Season Average: $162 | 2015 Season Average: $127 | Year-over-Year Change: +28%

USC struggled down the stretch last season, winning just one of their four final games and suffering back-to-back losses to Stanford in the Pac-12 Championship Game and Wisconsin in the Holiday Bowl. The Trojans have the tools to make a push in the South division — QB Cody Kessler was the only full-time offensive player to leave in the offseason — but they’ll be tested by divisional rivals UCLA and Utah, each who are expected to have massive seasons. Even so, USC tickets have increased 28% on average this season, rising from $127 to $162 for games at the Rose Bowl.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

This Labor Day, Remember That Martin Luther King's Last Campaign Was for Workers' Rights

2016-09-02-1472818743-3526137-MartinLutherKingandWalterReuther.jpg 2016-09-02-1472818800-911126-MartinLutherKingatMasonTemple.jpg
Martin Luther with United Auto Workers president Walter Reuther and giving his last speech at a union rally in Memphis

Most Americans today know that Reverend Martin Luther King Jr. was killed in Memphis, Tennessee in 1968, but few know why he was there. King went to Memphis to support African American garbage workers, who were on strike to protest unsafe conditions, abusive white supervisors, and low wages — and to gain recognition for their union. Their picket signs relayed a simple but profound message: “I Am A Man.”

Today we view King as something of a saint, his birthday a national holiday, and his name adorning schools and street signs. But in his day, the establishment considered King a dangerous troublemaker. He was harassed by the FBI and vilified in the media. He began his activism in Montgomery, Alabama, as a crusader against the nation’s racial caste system, but the struggle for civil rights radicalized him into a fighter for broader economic and social justice.

As we celebrate Labor Day on Monday, let’s remember that King was committed to building bridges between the civil rights and labor movements.

Invited to address the AFL-CIO’s annual convention in 1961, King observed:

“Our needs are identical with labor’s needs: decent wages, fair working conditions, livable housing, old-age security, health and welfare measures, conditions in which families can grow, have education for their children, and respect in the community. That is why Negroes support labor’s demands and fight laws which curb labor. That is why the labor-hater and labor-baiter is virtually always a twin-headed creature spewing anti-Negro epithets from one mouth and anti-labor propaganda from the other mouth.”

He added:

“The labor movement did not diminish the strength of the nation but enlarged it. By raising the living standards of millions, labor miraculously created a market for industry and lifted the whole nation to undreamed of levels of production. Those who today attack labor forget these simple truths, but history remembers them.”

Several major unions reciprocated King’s support. When he was jailed in Birmingham for participating in civil disobedience, it was Walter Reuther, the charismatic leader of the United Auto Workers (UAW) union, who paid his $165,000 bail.

Several major unions, especially the UAW and the International Ladies Garment Workers, had donated money to civil rights groups, supported the sit-ins and freedom rides, and helped organize the massive 1963 March on Washington, where King delivered his famous “I Have a Dream” speech.

We often forget that its official name was the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom and that its manifesto called on Congress not only to pass a civil rights bill but also “a national minimum wage act that will give all Americans a decent standard of living.” The manifesto pointed out that “anything less than $2.00 an hour fails to do this.”

In 1963, the minimum wage was $1.25 — the equivalent of $9.83 in today’s dollars. A $2 minimum wage in 1963 would be $15.73 an hour today.

2016-09-02-1472819048-2696213-MartinLutherKingpicketingwithlaborunion.jpg
Martin Luther King picketing with striking members of the International Chemical Workers Union at the Scripto plant in Atlanta in 1964

In the 1960s, the sit-ins (a tactic adopted from workers’ sit-down strikes in the 1930s), Freedom Rides, mass marches, and voter registration drives eventually led Congress to enact the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965. King was proud of the civil rights movement’s success in winning the passage of those important laws. But he realized that neither law did much to provide better jobs or housing for the large numbers of low-income African Americans in the cities and rural areas. He recognized the limits of breaking down legal segregation.

“What does it profit a man to be able to eat at an integrated lunch counter if he doesn’t earn enough money to buy a hamburger and a cup of coffee?” King asked.

King observed: “Negroes are not the only poor in the nation. There are nearly twice as many white poor as Negro, and therefore the struggle against poverty is not involved solely with color or racial discrimination but with elementary economic justice.” To achieve economic justice, King said, “there must be a better distribution of wealth within this country for all God’s children.”

“There is nothing but a lack of social vision to prevent us from paying an adequate wage to every American whether he [or she] is a hospital worker, laundry worker, maid, or day laborer,” said King.

In a speech to the Illinois AFL-CIO in 1965, King said:

“The two most dynamic movements that reshaped the nation during the past three decades are the labor and civil rights movements. Our combined strength is potentially enormous. We have not used a fraction of it for our own good or for the needs of society as a whole. If we make the war on poverty a total war; if we seek higher standards for all workers for an enriched life, we have the ability to accomplish it, and our nation has the ability to provide it. lf our two movements unite their social pioneering initiative, thirty years from now people will look back on this day and honor those who had the vision to see the full possibilities of modern society and the courage to fight for their realization. On that day, the brotherhood of man, undergirded by economic security, will be a thrilling and creative reality.”

A half-century before Occupy Wall Street, King warned about the “gulf between the haves and the have-nots” and insisted that America needed a “better distribution of wealth.”

Thus, it was not surprising that Memphis’ civil rights and union leaders invited King to their city to help draw national attention to the garbage strike.

The strike began over the mistreatment of 22 sewer workers who reported for work on January 31, 1968, and were sent home when it began raining. White employees were not sent home. When the rain stopped after an hour or so, they continued to work and were paid for the full day, while the black workers lost a day’s pay. The next day, two sanitation workers, Echol Cole and Robert Walker, were crushed to death by a malfunctioning city garbage truck.

These two incidents epitomized the workers’ long-standing grievances. Wages averaged about $1.70 per hour. Forty percent of the workers qualified for welfare to supplement their poverty-level salaries. They had almost no health care benefits, pensions, or vacations. They worked in filthy conditions, and lacked basic amenities like a place to eat and shower. They were required to haul leaky garbage tubs that spilled maggots and debris on them. White supervisors called them “boy” and arbitrarily sent them home without pay for minor infractions that they overlooked when white workers did the same thing. The workers asked Memphis Mayor Henry Loeb and the City Council to improve their working conditions, but they refused to do so.

On February 12, 1,300 black sanitation workers walked off their jobs, demanding that the city recognize their union (the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, AFSCME) and negotiate to resolve their grievances. They also demanded a pay increase to $2.35 an hour, overtime pay, and merit promotions without regard to race.

For the next several months, city officials refused to negotiate with the union. In private, Mayor Loeb reportedly told associates, “I’ll never be known as the mayor who signed a contract with a Negro union.”

The city used non-union workers and supervisors to pick up garbage downtown, from hospitals, and in residential areas. Even so, thousands of tons of garbage piled up. Community support for the strikers grew steadily. The NAACP endorsed the strike and sponsored all-night vigils and pickets at City Hall. On February 23, 1,500 people — strikers and their supporters — packed City Hall chambers, but the all-white City Council voted to back the mayor’s refusal to recognize the union.

Local ministers (led by Rev. James Lawson) formed a citywide group to support the strikers. They called on their congregants to participate in rallies and marches, donate to the strike fund, and boycott downtown stores in order to get business leaders to pressure city officials to negotiate with the union. On Sunday, March 3, an eight-hour gospel singing marathon at Mason Temple raised money for strikers. The next day, the beginning of the fourth week of the strike, 500 white labor unionists from Memphis and other Tennessee cities joined black ministers and sanitation workers in their daily downtown march.

On several occasions, the police attacked the strikers with clubs and mace. They harassed protestors and even arrested strike leaders for jaywalking. On March 5, 117 strikers and supporters were arrested for sitting in at city hall. Six days later, hundreds of students skipped high school to participate in a march led by black ministers. Two students were arrested.

At the rallies, ministers and union activists linked the workers’ grievances with the black community’s long-standing anger over police abuse, slum housing, segregated and inadequate schools, and the concentration of blacks in the lowest-paying, dirtiest jobs.

Despite the escalating protest, the city establishment dug in its heals, refusing to compromise and demanding that the strikers return to work or risk losing their jobs. The local daily newspaper, the Commercial Appeal, consistently opposed the strikers. “Memphis garbage strikers have turned an illegal walk out into anarchy,” it wrote in one editorial, “and Mayor Henry Loeb is exactly right when he says, ‘We can’t submit to this sort of thing!'”

Mayor Loeb and City Attorney Frank B. Gianotti persuaded a local judge to issue an injunction prohibiting the strike and picketing. The union and its allies refused to end their protests. Several union leaders — AFSCME’s international president Jerry Wurf, Local 1733 President T.O. Jones, and national staffers William Lucy and P. J. Ciampa — were cited for contempt, sentenced to 10 days in jail, fined $50, and freed pending appeal.

With tensions rising and no compromise in sight, local ministers and AFSCME invited King to Memphis to re-energize the local movement, lift the strikers’ flagging spirits, and encourage them to remain nonviolent. On Monday, March 18, King spoke at a rally attended by 17,000 people and called for a citywide march. He said:

“One day our society will come to respect the sanitation worker if it is to survive, for the person who picks up our garbage, in the final analysis, is as significant as the physician, for if he doesn’t do his job, diseases are rampant. All labor has dignity.”

His speech triggered national media attention, and catalyzed the rest of the labor movement to expand its support for the strikers.

King returned to Memphis on Thursday, March 28, to lead a march. The police moved into crowds with night sticks, mace, tear gas, and gunfire. The police arrested 280 people. 60 were injured. A 16-year-old boy, Larry Payne, was shot to death. The state legislature authorized a 7 p.m. curfew and 4,000 National Guardsmen moved in. The next day, 300 sanitation workers and supporters marched peacefully and silently to City Hall — escorted by five armored personnel carriers, five jeeps, three large military trucks, and dozens of Guardsmen with bayonets fixed. President Lyndon Johnson and AFL-CIO President George Meany offered their help in resolving the dispute, but Mayor Loeb turned them down.

King came back to Memphis on Wednesday, April 3 to address a rally to pressure city officials to negotiate a compromise solution to the strike. That night, at the Mason Temple — packed with over 10,000 black workers and residents, ministers, white union members, white liberals, and students — King delivered what would turn out to be his last speech. He emphasized the linked fate of the civil rights and labor movements:

“Memphis Negroes are almost entirely a working people. Our needs are identical with labor’s needs — decent wages, fair working conditions, livable housing, old age security, health and welfare measures, conditions in which families can grow, have education for their children and respect in the community. That is why Negroes support labor’s demands and fight laws which curb labor. That is why the labor-hater and labor-baiter is virtually always a twin-headed creature spewing anti-Negro epithets from one mouth and anti-labor propaganda from the other mouth.”

The next day, James Earl Ray assassinated King as he stood on the balcony outside his room at the Lorraine Hotel.

As Time magazine noted at the time: “Ironically, it was the violence of Martin Luther King’s death rather than the nonviolence of his methods that ultimately broke the city’s resistance” and led to the strike settlement.

President Johnson ordered federal troops to Memphis and instructed Undersecretary of Labor James Reynolds to mediate the conflict and settle the strike. The following week, King’s widow, Coretta Scott King, and dozens of national figures led a peaceful memorial march through downtown Memphis in tribute to King and in support of the strike. Local business leaders, tired of the boycott and the downtown demonstrations, urged Loeb to come to terms with the strikers.

On April 16, union leaders and city officials reached an agreement. The City Council passed a resolution recognizing the union. The 14-month contract included union dues check-off, a grievance procedure, and wage increases of 10 cents per hour May 1 and another five cents in September. Members of AFSCME Local 1733 approved the agreement unanimously and ended their strike.

The settlement wasn’t only a victory for the sanitation workers. The strike had mobilized the African American community, which subsequently became increasingly involved in local politics and school and jobs issues, and which developed new allies in the white community.

Like the civil rights movement of the 1960s, there is a growing movement in the United States today protesting the nation’s widening economic inequality and persistent poverty.

One of the most vibrant crusades is the ongoing battle to raise the minimum wage. In the past 40 years, the federal minimum wage — stuck at $7.25 since 2009 because Republicans in Congress have refused to act — has lost 30% of its value.

As a result, low-wage workers for fast-food chains and big box retailers, janitors, security guards, day laborers, and others have forged a grassroots movement to pressure their employers (like Walmart and McDonalds) to raise starting salaries and benefits. These workers and their allies have engaged in civil disobedience and strikes to galvanize public opinion.

Coalitions of unions, community organizations, faith-based and immigrant rights groups have also successfully pushed cities and states to adopt minimum wage laws that will pay families enough to meet basic needs. A growing number of cities — including Seattle, Los Angeles, Kansas City, Chicago, San Francisco, Washington, D.C., Pasadena, and many others — have passed minimum wage laws that will gradually reach between $13 and $15 an hour, typically with an annual cost-of-living increase. Los Angeles County — the nation’s largest county — adopted a law that will raise the minimum wage to $15 in unincorporated cities. Earlier this year California and New York adopted state laws to bring the minimum wage to $15 an hour. Massachusetts adopted a $15 minimum wage for home care workers.

In recent years, New York, California, Massachusetts, and Hawaii have adopted different versions of the Domestic Workers’ Bill of Rights that provides new protections for nannies, babysitters, senior care aides, housekeepers and others — primarily women and many of them immigrants — who are excluded from federal labor protections.

A growing number of cities (including Philadelphia, Austin, Seattle, Cincinnati, Kansas City, Portland (Oregon), Chicago, Minneapolis, San Francisco, and Washington, D.C), counties (including Missoula County in Montana, Pima County in Arizona, and Kings County in Washington), and states (including California, New Jersey, and Rhode Island) have adopted laws providing government employees, and in some places all employees, with paid family leave — a right that workers in most other countries already take for granted. These laws require employers to pay workers’ salaries if they take time off from work to care for a new child following birth, adoption, or foster placement, to recover from a pregnancy or childbirth-related disability, and/or to take care of sick family members. As the number of cities and states with such laws continues to grow, Congress will be under increasing pressure to adopt similar policies at the federal level.

“Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere,” King wrote in his Letter From Birmingham Jail. “We are caught in an inescapable network of mutuality, tied in a single garment of destiny. Whatever affects one directly, affects all indirectly.”

Just as King helped build bridges between the labor and civil rights movements, today’s union activists are forging closer ties to the immigrant rights, women’s rights, and environmental justice movements, as well as to struggles to reform Wall Street and to challenge the proliferation of guns and the mass incarceration of people of color.

In his final speech at Memphis’ Mason Temple on April 3, 1968, King, only 39 at the time, told the crowd about a bomb threat on his plane from Atlanta that morning, saying he knew that his life was constantly in danger because of his political activism.

“I would like to live a long life,” he said. “Longevity has its place. But I’m not concerned about that now. I just want to do God’s will. And he’s allowed me to go up to the mountain, and I’ve looked over, and I’ve seen the promised land. I may not get there with you. But I want you to know tonight that we as a people will get to the promised land.”

We haven’t gotten there yet. But King is still with us in spirit. The best way to honor his memory this Labor Day and every day is to continue the struggle for human dignity, workers’ rights, living wages, and social justice.

Peter Dreier is professor of politics and chair of the Urban & Environmental Policy Department at Occidental College. His latest book is The 100 Greatest Americans of the 20th Century: A Social Justice Hall of Fame (Nation Books).

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

This Creepy-Ass Doll Better Not Appear In The New Season Of 'American Horror Story'

FX is still keen on keeping the Season 6 theme of “American Horror Story” a mystery, but that hasn’t stopped the network from releasing new and increasingly creepy promos for the show. 

Behold the latest teaser, titled “Baby Face,” featuring a terrifying doll with a serious dental problem. Ew.

It seems highly unlikely that dolly dearest will be a big part of Season 6 considering the sweepstakes the network is currently running. For the chance to win a car, fans are asked to choose the teaser that best represents the premiere episode from six options. “Baby Face” isn’t one of them. She might still appear in the new season ― but, for the record, we hope she doesn’t.

“American Horror Story” Season 6 premieres Wednesday, Sept. 14, at 10 p.m. on FX. 

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Colin Kaepernick Shows Unapologetic Pride With Afro In Full Formation

Colin Kaepernick’s blackness was on full display Thursday night when he continued his protest against the national anthem while rocking a full-fledged ‘fro on the field. 

The San Fransisco 49ers quarterback decided last Friday to sit during the national anthem in protest against police brutality and America’s systemic oppression of black people. On Thursday, Kaepernick carried out the same act of defiance alongside other players who joined him. Except this time, Kaepernick didn’t miss the chance to comb out his curls, maybe add a little oil sheen and play the game with an afro so round and full that it made the perfect fodder for a hashtag: #KapSoBlack.

Black Twitter chimed in by praising Kaepernick’s natural do and his unapologetic embrace of his blackness. Here are just a few of those hilarious and truthful tweets under the hashtag: 

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

We Are All Sports Fans

We are all sport fans. Being a sports fan allows us to enjoy life, have fun, and connect with friends and community. Being a sports fan means more than just donning your favorite team’s jersey or singing your university’s fight song. We become a part of something bigger than ourselves, something that can be positive and uplifting. Sports fans help make sports come alive. And this love of sport is a two-way street. You see, athletes need and love sports fans just like sports fans need and love their athletes.

How and why are you a sports fan? A highlight of being a sports fan is the chance to dress up, dance, cheer and go wild in the stands, at a sports bar, or at home in your living room. Sports fandom is open to everyone and does not discriminate. This comes across loud and clear when looking at the diversity of humanity reflected in sports fans. When looking around sports facilities today is seems absolutely incomprehensible that at one point in US history stadium seating areas were designated as Whites Only. Today fans from all walks of life cheer together, sharing celebratory “high-fives” and hugs when their teams score.

Sports fans often do the wave in stadiums, arenas, fields and parks around the United States and around the world. The wave is an amazing unifying experience that lasts for minutes but stays with us throughout our lives. Sports fans are defined as “enthusiastic devotees,” “ardent admirers,” “enthusiasts,” and yes, even “fanatics” at times. These words can surely describe all of us.

Although sports fans may develop early connections to sports, teams and athletes, there is always an opportunity for fans to learn about and become supporters of new and different sports. With a wide variety of sports on their programs, the Olympic and Paralympic Games create possibilities for the realization that we can all be sports fans. The right combination of hype, energy and visibility opens our eyes to a wide range of sports and activities. We can readily see the potential for a fan-base that wants to engage with women’s sports or adaptive sports on a more regular basis.

With the Rio Paralympic Games starting on September 7, sports fans eager to watch elite athletes compete and still riding the wave of the Olympic Games cannot wait to see, hear and follow Paralympic sports and athletes from around the world. During the London 2012 Summer Paralympic Games over 3 billion (yes that is 3 billion with a “B”) fans worldwide tuned in to digital coverage during the 12 days of competitions and ceremonies. The Games trended on Twitter in ways never seen before for adaptive sport. Why? Exciting athletes, compelling stories, national pride – the same reasons people tuned in to watch the Olympic Games.

As an athlete, nothing matches feeling supported and followed by fans when chasing your dreams. Fan support is important to athletes both with and without a disability. A fan of basketball can be a fan of wheelchair basketball, a volleyball fan can thoroughly enjoy sitting volleyball, and rugby is rugby, whether it’s men’s, women’s or quad rugby, which is often referred to by the intriguing name Murderball. And if you love soccer then you are definitely going to love 5-a-side blind soccer. The most important thing about sports fans is that they stay fans. After 12 days of the Rio Paralympic Games, the fan base must continue to follow and rally for all of the athletes.

Want to show your support for Paralympic athletes and share your experience as a fan of adaptive sports? Join the MPower Sports social media campaign and use #WeAreAllSportsFans to show support for your favorite Paralympic athlete, sport, or national team. Share how you are a sports fan and why you think we are all sports fans!

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Cowardice at the University of Chicago

Well, that University of Chicago sure made it clear who’s the boss! The recent and highly publicized “warning” to incoming freshman was a blatant bit of pandering to the seemingly overwhelming consensus that women, students of color, and gay folks are too sensitive and that their playing the “victim” is soiling the integrity of colleges and universities.

John Ellison, dean of students, wrote, “Our commitment to academic freedom means that we do not support so-called trigger warnings, we do not cancel invited speakers because their topics might prove controversial, and we do not condone the creation of intellectual ‘safe spaces’ where individuals can retreat from ideas and perspectives at odds with their own,”

One more solid blow against “political correctness” and the restoration of the rights of privileged white men to exercise their powerful intellectual might. What a courageous man!

Or perhaps, what an unmitigated load of faux intellectualism and capitulation to mean-spirited conventional wisdom.

The University of Chicago, or at least Ellison, herein commits a superfluous act of conflation, whether intentional or merely stupid. In the pubic conversation about “political correctness,” at least in the campus context, there are two very different matters.

Few, certainly not I, condone the rare vigilante effort to disinvite a controversial speaker or to silence uncomfortable speech. As is true with any political or social issue, those wishing to broadly condemn “political correctness” can find an egregious example to arouse sentiment in their favor. That tactic is no more virtuous than welfare reformers who find a “queen” buying potato chips or conservative politicians who impose voting hurdles on poor communities of color by evoking fears of non-existent voter fraud.

So, I gladly stipulate to the notion that we should not yield to those who would shout down a speaker or force cancellation of a provocative presentation. In these cases, there is “harm,” in that a legitimate form of speech is inhibited. All of society, particularly educational institutions, should vigorously protect the right to uncomfortable expression. To quote a slice of a broader thought from Justice Louis B. Brandeis, ” . . . the remedy to be applied is more speech, not enforced silence.”

But that is not the issue addressed by Ellison’s message or by the broad condemnation of “political correctness” among most conservatives and too many liberals. In the main, accusations of “political correctness” are flung widely and carelessly as cover for those who wish to be crude, cruel, offensive or insensitive with impunity.

This intellectually dishonest condemnation of “political correctness” has fueled the abominable “speech” coming from the Trump campaign, beginning with the candidate himself and cascading through his supporters, who use racial epithets, threats of violence and crude caricatures with apparent glee. It bears noting, for those who genuinely care about freedom of expression, that not a one of these offensive “speakers,” including Trump himself, has faced threat of any civil or criminal penalties as a result of their vile utterances.

One of society’s great advances, on and off campus, has been the recognition of different identities, the encouragement of empathy and the embrace of those who have been historically marginalized or vilified in society. Acknowledging privilege, understanding racism, and encouraging civility are not examples of “political correctness,” they are gratifying signs of an evolving society. The anti-PC voices seem to be nostalgic for a time when privilege wasn’t challenged and marginalized voices stayed on the margins.

When Yale University officials gently suggested that students not appear in black face on Halloween, others rapidly jumped in to yell “political correctness!!!” and hammered the University for coddling students. Really? The anti-PC outcry would have been quite justified had Yale threatened to punish any student who engaged in offensive costuming. But, of course, that wasn’t the issue. In the name of “academic freedom,” the gentle suggestion that students should be thoughtful was the perceived offense, not the possibility of some smart ass intentionally insulting hundreds of students for whom blackface is a reminder of slavery and centuries of institutional racism. Which of these two things should offend our sensibilities?

When students receive, and perhaps heed, so-called “trigger warnings,” it harms no other person. The professor is not compelled to sanitize the curriculum. Other students are not denied the educational opportunity to absorb the strong material. When students wish to rest in a “safe space,” affinity group or other setting where they might commiserate or find comfort, what harm has it done to the privileged majority?

Is it the University of Chicago’s position – is it our society’s position – that women, people of color and gay folks should shut up and endure whatever curriculum or social climate confronts them, no matter how hurtful it feels? What harm does it do the university, what harm does it do society – what harm does it do you – to gracefully yield to the lived experiences of others now and then?

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

"How to Bathe a Dog"

By Jerry Zezima

Over many years of living in a household where the fur frequently flies, I have learned that the best way to get rid of fleas, ticks and other pests, and to stop incessant scratching, is to bathe the itchy sufferer with a liberal application of special soap, rinse thoroughly and follow up with a treat.

It works on dogs, too.

My wife, Sue, whose grooming is impeccable, recently suggested that our granddog, Maggie, be given a bath. Maggie doesn’t have fleas, ticks or other pests. In fact, she is impeccably groomed herself. But she does have dry skin that causes her to do what people often tell me to do: go scratch.

So Sue thought it was time for a bath.

“Can’t I just take a shower?” I asked.

Sue sighed and said, “Hook up the hose outside and get the doggy shampoo.”

It’s a good thing we weren’t doing this in the bathroom because Maggie doesn’t like to be bathed. She’s totally unlike our late pooch, Lizzie, who loved being given the spa treatment. She’d just stand there, soaking it all in. After she was dried off and brushed, she’d go back inside and preen. Then she’d plop down and take a nap.

That is the difference between dogs and humans: After a bath or a shower, a person has to go to work to keep man’s best friend in the style to which he or she has become accustomed.

And we call dogs dumb animals.

To bathe a dog, you will need the aforementioned hose and shampoo, as well as a towel. That’s for the dog.

For you, there’s a much bigger list: three pairs of rubber gloves, a bathing suit (or, if it’s chilly, a raincoat), flip-flops (or galoshes), goggles, a shower cap, fishing waders or, depending on how much the dog shakes, rattles, rolls and otherwise dislikes the bath, scuba gear.

You’ll also need a collar and a leash. So will the dog.

Step 1: Put the collar on the dog, attach the leash and, with one hand, hold firmly. With your other hand, hold the hose. With your third hand, turn on the water. If you have an assistant, he can turn on the water. I was assisting Sue, so that was my job. Since dogs have four hands, you wonder why they just can’t bathe themselves.

Step 2: Wet the dog, being careful that the dog, in its excitement, doesn’t wet you. Then hold on to the leash for dear life because most dogs won’t like this and will pull you with such force that one arm will end up being six inches longer than the other one. If you have a mastiff, you may also be dragged for three blocks. It will hurt like hell if fences are involved.

Step 3: If the previous step goes well, apply the shampoo or soap and rub it into the dog’s coat. At this point, your fingers will pop through your first set of rubber gloves. Put on another pair and continue washing. Be sure to get behind the ears, around the haunches and along the tail. If you have a bulldog or a schnauzer, or if you are washing yourself, this last part will be unnecessary.

Step 4: Don your last pair of rubber gloves and rinse the dog off. Then stand back or the dog will shake enough water on you to fill an Olympic-size swimming pool. At this point, fur will be all over your legs, feet and face, in your hair and wedged permanently under your fingernails.

Step 5: Dry off the dog with a bath towel.

Step 6: Burn the towel.

Step 7: Brush the dog to get off the rest of the loose fur. You will notice that the dog has dandruff. Ignore it and give the dog a treat.

Step 8: Give yourself a treat. A beer will do.

Step 9: Have another beer.

Step 10: Take a shower. Just like your dog did, you’ll need one.

Stamford Advocate humor columnist Jerry Zezima is the author of three books. His latest is “Grandfather Knows Best.” Visit his blog at www.jerryzezima.blogspot.com. Email: JerryZ111@optonline.net.

Copyright 2016 by Jerry Zezima

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Why Ian McKellan Thinks Gay Men Are More Masculine Than Straight Men

Sir Ian McKellan has no time for bullies in Hollywood or elsewhere. 

In a joint interview with longtime BFF Patrick Stewart in Friday’s Evening Standard, the 77-year-old star of “Lord of the Rings” and “The Hobbit” reflected on his career, which has included a number of military roles like Gandalf and Macbeth. 

Noting that he’s “probably played even more military men” than Stewart, McKellen said the reason for choosing those roles is “because I want my revenge on… the people who start wars, perpetuate them and glory in them.”

McKellen, who is openly gay, seemed to shrug off the implication that his sexuality would somehow affect his ability to play those militant roles, noting, “I think gay men are more masculine than straight men. Because, guess what? They love other men!’”

Reaching for Stewart’s hand, he then added, “So when bully boys say: ‘Faggot!’ you say, ‘That’s right, I’m with the boys.’”

The two-time Oscar nominee has been famously outspoken when it comes to the need for diversity, including queer representation, in Hollywood. Earlier this year, he said that criticism of the 2016 Academy Awards for failing to nominate people of color was legitimate, but noted that he hoped that conversation could extend to other minority groups, including LGBT people, on the big screen. 

“As a representative of the industry they’re in, [the Academy is] receiving complaints which I fully sympathize with,” he told Sky News. “It’s not only black people who’ve been disregarded by the film industry, it used to be women, it’s certainly gay people to this day.” 

With out stars like McKellen breaking boundaries, hopefully that won’t be the case for too much longer. 

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.