Empathy: The One Tool You Need to Humanize Your Employee Experience

2016-08-30-1472562349-1949173-ChristopherKelly.jpg
By Christopher Kelly

For-profit enterprises are in a better position to create positive change in the world than nonprofits are — with or without a corporate social responsibility program. Regardless of what industry you’re in, how many people your company employs, or how many people you manage, your actions and leadership style touch people’s lives.

With people spending about a third of their days at work, you are a major contributor toward how happy and proud your team members are. As an employer, you answer the question “How was your day today?” as they walk through the door. You are responsible for their professional development and for the chapters of their legacies that are written under your management.

Here are a few ideas to think about and inspire you to challenge traditional, impersonal management styles:

1. Play a role in your employees’ lives. Empathy is the most important virtue for managers to wrap their minds around. Really put yourself in your teammates’ shoes and walk through their lives. Step into their house. Sit at their dinner table. Talk to their kids. Write them a note that they can proudly hang on their refrigerator. Brag about them to their parents. Stay awake with them and worry at night.

Nobody will stand up at your retirement party or funeral and tell stories about the profit margins you drove. They will talk about the role that you played in their lives. Let this be your score card.

2. Remember that every one of your employees is a CEO at home. They make major capital decisions, balance budgets, develop family culture, lead and inspire their children, review leases, write wills, and do it all without your help, direction or oversight. They are smarter and more capable than anyone gives them credit for. The lower a person is on the pay scale, the more creative and able he is with capital.

What happens to all of those capabilities when employees step into your office? What has your hierarchy done for their potential? The people your employees are at home don’t have to disappear for your company to work: in fact, just the opposite is true. What if every person, at every level, was fully engaged in building your company from within? Don’t hire fancy consultants to solve problems that your team already has answers for. Do respect that the best solutions are found by the people closest to the problem. You don’t always know better. Ask before you tell.

3. Write their hero story. Driving a school bus is probably the most important job in the world. What could be more important than safely delivering 72 children home every day? That’s a bus driver’s hero story — but every employee has one. Managers need to develop a hero story for their team members. Tell that story for them, and celebrate their contribution publicly. Make them proud of their work, and performance will follow — happily, naturally, and easily.

My company is in the conference center business. For employees at most venues, this might be an uninspiring job, a means to an end, or a simple paycheck. However, our people change the world each day, and they know it.

For example, one of our clients uses our meeting space every year to determine which cancer treatments graduate from clinical trials to be put into practice at hospitals around the world. The decisions that leaders make within our facilities affect the lives of countless people. The meetings we host today make the headlines of The Wall Street Journal tomorrow. Our team’s performance influences the world’s most important meetings, just like an umpire’s call can change the outcome of a World Series game. Everybody’s work matters. You just need to connect the dots, write the story, and tell it.

4. Develop and build people 1 percent better each day. Great leaders know that they don’t build their own business. Instead, they develop and inspire the people who build it for them. No one person or group of people can build anything great alone. It takes an army, and the aggregate growth of the soldiers in your army is the rising tide that determines your company’s growth potential and capacity.

Leaders need to plot the trajectory of every single one of their employees. Set a simple goal of improving just 1 percent every day. It’s a simple, modest-sounding goal that’s massively transformative over time. One percent better every day yields a result that’s 1,260 times greater than 1 percent less when multiplied by 365 days in a year.

Workers increasingly pursue workplaces where they feel included and understood, and those who don’t contribute to the $11 billion in revenue lost due to employee turnover annually. Creating a strong company culture is a requirement, but it has to start with the purpose any given employee feels every single day.

Investing in people is expensive, so budget for it. Having uninspired people, high turnover, or a disengaged workforce will cost you everything.

Christopher Kelly is the co-founder of Convene, a company that combines service and design to improve the workplace experience. Since opening in 2009, the company’s portfolio of over 110,000 sq.ft. of real estate makes it the largest owner of day conference centers in New York and is quickly expanding to serve demand in other cities and for management services. Convene’s client list includes more than 65 percent of New York’s Fortune 500 companies. 

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Donald Trump Can't Resist Slamming 'Morning Joe' Hosts On Twitter

Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump just won’t stop attacking MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” hosts Mika Brzezinski and Joe Scarborough.

On Friday morning, Trump tweeted that Scarborough was “a mess” and accused Brzezinski of having “a mental breakdown” on air:

Trump regularly attacks the MSNBC hosts. In August, he suggested the two were in a relationship and called Brzezinski an “off the wall, a neurotic and not very bright mess!”

The two hosts have routinely criticized Trump on their show over the last few months, highlighting his “completely racist” remarks and saying his “stupidity is breathtaking.”

type=type=RelatedArticlesblockTitle=Related… + articlesList=575c4df1e4b0ced23ca83e57,56006018e4b00310edf819e2,57011b48e4b0daf53aefe877

Editor’s note: Donald Trump regularly incites political violence and is a serial liar, rampant xenophobe, racist, misogynist and birther who has repeatedly pledged to ban all Muslims — 1.6 billion members of an entire religion — from entering the U.S.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Life Requires More From Us Than Death: Ending The Death Penalty In Charleston, Too

The United States of America was born in violence. The brutality, severity, and ubiquity of violence during slavery preceded and followed our country’s founding. It was, indeed, inscribed and fundamentally baked into the parchment of our constitution. For many of us this is a difficult and disturbing truth to face, but one we know too well. It persistently unsettles the meaning of our democracy and search for a more perfect union. It too often disturbs long-cherished beliefs and practices and disrupts visions of what our future holds. The death penalty has been and remains an essential and consistent form of this American violence–often its messenger–and it is time to stop.

For the first peoples of this land, communities of African descent, other communities of color and poor people, news about America the violent, is not really news at all. Ours is a different recognition grounded in a historic set of oppressions established through searing social custom, legislative fiat, religious teachings, and racial taxonomies. Enslavement, segregation, discrimination, criminalization, removal, poverty, second-class citizenship, and all manner of brutality and violation are its legacy. It is a legacy that continues still, nowhere more prominently than in the continued administration of the death penalty.

Oppressions based on race, gender, class, sex, ethnicity and so much more have had deep material and spiritual consequences for our national community life. Long before ascending to the Supreme Court, Thurgood Marshall battled the death penalty on behalf of Black lives in the South that were diminished and treated as inconsequential, cheap, abbreviated, and expendable. Marshall’s 1940’s heroics in the killing fields of Lake County, Florida, included exposing and challenging brandings, lynchings, rape, abuse, burnings, and bombings. Today, many of those atrocities have given way to predatory lending, redlining, mass incarceration, health disparities, voter exclusion, three strikes, stop and frisk, and stand your ground. The struggle against state-sanctioned violence, homegrown terror, sexual aggression, bullying, profiling, shootings, killings, and assassinations racks the increasingly fragile American psyche. The death penalty, then as now, is the tip of this iceberg.

Americans are not alone in the urgent struggle to reclaim our deeper humanity. The world over is seized with dehumanizing pain. It has long been so. Nelson Mandela, and all of Africa, bore the pain and scars of violent imperialism and systems that by law and practice denied African humanity. Mandela saw that there could be no future for South Africa or its Black population if the death penalty, as instrument or symbol remained. Today, indifference and hatred seems to grow more debilitating by the moment. Violence and terror is without boundary. From Palestine and Paris to African Mediterranean refugee routes and Syria, the refrain is agonizingly personal and distressingly the same. Old divisions have become new. We have seen “all the oppressions that are practiced under the sun.” (Ecclesiastes 4:1)

There is so much in our experience as African Americans, as a people who have undergone the terror, who were once forcibly enslaved, the raped and the lynched, the foreclosed and the incarcerated, to warrant our hatred of this country. This simple and seldom-expressed truth courses through our veins and has always been known and feared in this land by others, including the perpetrators. Yet somehow, African America remains true to itself, waging justice in the face of this nation’s grave shortcomings, and our own apprehensions no less, declaring that we will find a way to live together in this rainbow nation and world and not perish together as fools. We care enough to advocate for right, to challenge institutional racism, to be collectively angry and morally indignant over the senseless loss and devaluation of Black lives. In critical solidarity with other communities of struggle, we are forging new meanings of justice and the birth of a new nation.

Truth telling, the call for public conversations on race, racism, and recognition of intersectional realities – state and domestic forms of violence, police shootings and the shootings of police, health and gender equity, queer and transgender equality, Islamophobia and immigration, to name a few – is terribly important. We must learn how to talk meaningfully about and act effectively against the complex realities of racism. No death penalty trial, whether in Charleston, Boston, or Texas, will contribute one iota, to this necessary national conversation. A new vocabulary and a new resolve in this present moment are required.

Truth telling also requires something even more courageous of us. Sometimes, we have to commit to do the unnoticed restorative work of laying the foundation, of walking the talk, of consensus-building, of consciousness-raising, one individual at a time, of sustaining the movement toward a more just, sustainable, and inclusive world that is ours to envision even if it has not yet appeared on the horizon.

One year ago in Charleston, South Carolina, nine people were killed during Bible study and prayer, by a twenty-one year old self-professed white supremacist; five survived, including a child. In the current maelstrom, there are those who seek to hold the killer accountable by death. Such a response is certainly understandable. In some quarters it may even be accepted wisdom. But successful prosecution of the death penalty extends our national cycle of violence and death and the almost certain continued disproportionate execution of people who are Black, Brown, poor, and impaired – the traditional subjects of capital punishment, a penalty rooted in racial terrorism.

We, therefore reject the notion that you offer reparations to those who have suffered racial violence by offering more violence. Our just obligation is to hold the killer fully accountable, honor the legacy of the lives lost, and promote the restoration of health and well-being to a devastated community. A severe prison sentence of life without possibility of release, and ultimately death in prison is a devastating, lifelong punishment that powerfully, importantly, rejects the barbarism of state-inflicted death. It also allows for redemption. Death and the instruments of death must be eliminated from our criminal justice system. Our historic struggle against state-sanctioned terror requires it. The God of life expects no less.

There is a resurgent movement today insisting it is time to end state violence and systemic oppression, to break the endless cycle of racial animus, trauma, and death. Nineteen states have abolished the death penalty, seven in the last decade. Four Governors have imposed moratoria on executions and new death sentences and executions have been reduced nationwide. The Democratic Party platform during this critical election year calls for abolition and public support for the death penalty is at an all-time low. Dismantling the death penalty is a crucial component for communities of struggle to reach their full potential.

A wellspring of strength is found in the most incredible of places: The historic Mother Emanuel African Methodist Episcopal Church. The nine murdered saints. The five survivors.

There is an opportunity to unite with countless courageous others who have called on our nation and our world to learn to return love for hate at this crossroads in history. Nelson Mandela. Martin Luther King, Jr. Coretta Scott King. Bernice King. Daddy King. Thurgood Marshall. Desmond Tutu. William Barber. Bryan Stevenson. Cornel West. Harry Belafonte. KRS-One. Big Boi. Ta-Nehisi Coates. Michelle Alexander. Angela Davis. Some of those others have directly lost loved ones to violence. Some have directly challenged the prison-industrial complex. All have opposed the death penalty. All are champions for justice. All have said that the death penalty only perpetuates the endless cycle of death. All say Not in Our Name. All have testified that the right to life and dignity is greater than retribution and fear. Life requires more from us than death. Let us work for such a world above all else.

Alton B. Pollard, III and Henderson Hill

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

6 Things Solo Travel Teaches You

This post originally appeared on National Geographic.

I still marvel I didn’t drop stone-cold dead from embarrassment during my first solo travel experience. As a 20-year-old, I booked a spontaneous trip to Darwin in Australia’s Northern Territory. I didn’t want to go alone, but none of my friends had the time or money to go with me.

Everything went wrong from the start. Poor planning landed me in the only available room in town, a backpacker bunk room occupied by two German men who didn’t speak English. On a guided tour of Kakadu National Park, I fell for every prank my Australian guide pulled. (Eventually he stopped baiting me. My gullibility made it “easier than tackling a turtle,” he said.) And I won’t get into how I won a wet T-shirt contest I never entered, thanks to a bad wardrobe choice.

I am the reigning world heavyweight champion of beating myself up, and each mistake made me more self-conscious. I felt like Nancy No-Mates when I requested a table for one. I was certain everyone was watching me, wondering if I was recently jilted, or simply friendless.

It turned out someone was watching me. During my last solo supper in Australia, a British woman approached me. “I don’t want to interrupt, but I just had to say something,” she said. “I think you’re incredibly brave. I’ve seen you around town this week and you look like you’re having so much fun. I wish I had the courage to travel on my own like you.”

It took a while for her words to sink in, epiphanies being slower than self-recrimination, but during my next 21 years of traveling solo, I heard that same sentiment again and again.

I became a solo traveler out of necessity, rather than choice: As a travel writer I spend a lot of time on my own. Also, as my friends settled into their lives and acquired partners, children, careers, and mortgages, I discovered I had to travel solo if I wanted to travel at all.

I quickly learned to love it. There is a freedom to traveling alone: I am in charge of my own decisions and my own rhythm, and being in charge of my own travel budget has saved a few arguments, too. I’ve learned independence, and I’ve even learned to love loneliness. And I’m not alone: Solo travel is growing in popularity, particularly among women travelers, and it’s getting easier.

So if you haven’t tried traveling by yourself yet, you should. As a little encouragement, here are six things traveling solo has taught me.

1. You Won’t Die of Embarrassment

Fear of what other people think is one of the biggest barriers for potential solo travelers, but here’s the truth: My Darwin disaster became one of my fondest memories—and one of my favorite campfire stories. Darwin taught me that people don’t see me how I see myself. I look at solo travelers with respect, not pity, and that’s how people were looking at me. And if they are entertaining judgmental thoughts, what does it matter? I’ll never see them again. The more time I spent on the road alone, the stronger my self-confidence grew.

2. How to Be Lonely

You will get lonely traveling by yourself. Anyone who tells you differently is lying. But loneliness gets a bad rap. At the age of 41, I’ve collectively spent more time traveling on my own than with someone. And while some of it’s a drag (like lugging all your gear to the airport bathroom because you have no travel companion to watch it for you), I enjoy the time to myself.

Loneliness untangles and focuses my thoughts, although they always start off muddled. Once or twice I’ve discovered I’m not missing someone I should be, which answered a question I was too scared to ask at home. Loneliness taught me how I like to spend my time. Understanding my own pace, rhythms, and preferences has impacted every corner of my life, including where and how I live. We so rarely have time to be still, to be with ourselves. Traveling solo gives that gift.

It takes practice, being lonely. Here are a few tips that helped me:

  • Resist the urge to be busy all the time. Don’t fill every waking moment. Let yourself be. Loneliness isn’t boredom.
  • Don’t keep in touch. I have a difficult time being in the moment, and I miss loved ones more, if I keep in close contact while I’m away (including posting on and checking social media). I’ve conditioned my friends and family that no news is good news. They know my itinerary, and I check in regularly and briefly, but stories and pictures can wait until I get home.
  • Your demons will follow you. You can’t outrun them. So, turn around, face them, and invite them to have a cup of tea with you. By now, I’m old friends with mine.

3. How to Make Friends

All that being said about loneliness, you will meet people on your journey. Traveling alone forces us outside of our comfort zones, which makes us more receptive to new people and experiences. And solo travelers are less intimidating and more approachable than groups.

On some trips you’ll have interesting conversations with people you’ll never speak to again, which is fine. Some people can remain fond memories. On other trips, you’ll make friends—like-minded creatures you’ve impatiently been waiting to meet all your life. I’ve made some of my best and longest-lasting friendships on my solo trips. These are people with backgrounds and experiences so different to my own, only travel could have crossed our paths.

Here are a few tips on breaking the ice:

  • Put down the phone and pick up a book. I’ve never been approached with a phone or electronic device in hand. I am regularly interrupted (sometimes annoyingly so) while engrossed in a book.
  • Arrange a “group” solo travel experience. Sign up for a day tour or weekend side trip with a group of people you’ve never met. It’s easier to turn strangers into friends in a small group.
  • Focus on eating, not drinking. Stay at a B&B for the group breakfasts, or have dinner at the bar. Eating is a communal experience, and people respond to that. Cocktail hour is a more difficult dynamic to break into as most people are out with established groups of friends.

4. What You Want to Be When You Grow Up

More likely than not, traveling solo will help your career. New experiences open doors. You might stumble across a place or activity that changes your entire direction. Or you’ll meet someone you might want to collaborate with in the future. The world’s a small place, and travelers tend to find each other. You have time to get to know yourself, to reflect, to be momentarily free of criticism and competition. Learning to listen to—and trust—my own voice, away from distractions and pressure, bettered my writing.

5. The World Is (Mostly) Good

I was robbed in the Czech Republic, on a day trip from Prague to Brno. Thankfully I still had my passport and my gear was safe in my Prague hotel, but I had been forcibly relieved of my money and phone.

As I perched on a Brno bar stool, sipping water, trying to figure out my next move, three locals approached me and invited me to join their group of friends for a drink. I explained my predicament and they leapt into action, immediately buying me a drink “for courage.” They helped me liaise with local police. They installed me for the night with one of their grandmothers, a wonderful woman who spoke no English and made delicious and dangerous homemade slivovitz, a traditional brandy made from plums. She kept it in an earthen basement well she had dug by hand during World War II. I spent a large part of our evening together climbing up and down the ladder to fetch more liquor, and the rest of it sitting next to her on her worn couch, paging through her photo albums. In the morning, she walked me to the bus station and bought me a ticket back to Prague.

In 21 years of traveling solo, I can count the dodgy experiences on one hand. My travels have taught me the majority of people want to help, rather than harm. But things can happen. Taking a few precautions puts you in a better position to handle a situation if it comes up. Here’s what I do:

  • Listen to your gut. That prickling on your neck? The feeling something isn’t right? Heed it. Trust your instinct, even in the face of seeming rude or paranoid.
  • Enjoy yourself, but keep your wits about you. Traveling solo isn’t the time to get sozzled.
  • September 11 taught me that phone batteries die and networks jam in emergencies. I keep a folded piece of paper with me at all times. On one side is a scan of my passport. On the other is a list of important addresses and numbers: family, friends, embassies, consulates, hospitals. If you couldn’t use your phone, what information would you need? Write it down.
  • A pack of cigarettes, a pack of gum, and six $20 notes are still the best icebreakers and deal-makers on the planet.
  • Travel light. Don’t take anything you can’t carry. (And I’m not talking about a backpack on your back, one on your front, and something in each hand.) You might need to travel fast. Also, keep your gear with you at all times, including in taxis.
  • Always carry a business card of the place you’re staying, especially in countries where you don’t speak the language. It’s gotten me “home” more than once.
  • Leave your travel plans with someone back home, check in regularly (but briefly), and tell the concierge where you’re going when you leave the hotel.

6. Independence

My biggest solo trip turned out to be my best one. In 2004, I moved to New Zealand. I didn’t know a single person in the country. And I wouldn’t have been able to do that if I hadn’t traveled solo.

Traveling by myself has taught me things I couldn’t learn anywhere else. I learned how I like to spend my time, self-reliance, and I learned that I could go (just about) anywhere and do (just about) anything. And no one can take that knowledge or independence from me. It’s freedom.

The only way to try traveling solo is to book a ticket. Just go. You’ll be glad you did.

Carrie Miller is a New Zealand-based writer, traveler, and storyteller for National Geographic Traveler magazine and other publications. She loves trying new things, from diving with great white sharks in Australia to riding reindeer in Mongolia. Follow her on Facebook and Instagram.

More from National Geographic:

A Rocky Path Toward Maine’s New National Monument

One Of The World’s Biggest Fisheries Is On The Verge of Collapse

Go Way Back to School With These Vintage Photos

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

I'm an Atheist, and This Is How I Handled It When My Kids Asked to Go to Church

My wife and I are atheists. My 13 year old came up and said he wanted to attend church. What should I do? originally appeared on Quorathe knowledge sharing network where compelling questions are answered by people with unique insights.

Answer by Steve Brown, MSc Mathematics, on Quora:

My mother was very religious; my father, not so much. From the age of five, I was made to go to church. I hated it. I found it boring and found the fantastic stories extremely difficult to swallow. Before I was a teenager, I was a full-fledged atheist. My father then gave me permission not to go to church. (Incidentally, except for the disputes over going to church, my mother and I had a good relationship until the day she died. But we did have continuing discussions over the existence of a god.)

My children always knew that I was an atheist (my wife was a quiet theist who never attended services), but I never once told any of my children what to believe on any controversial subject. I told them that, for important issues, one should examine all the evidence and listen to all sides. I made a point of making sure that they understood that they should make up their own minds, that they didn’t have to believe the same as me on any issue, and that it included religion.

I did not want to force them not to attend church, but nor did I want to personally take them. It seemed hypocritical and they might think that I was taking them myself only so that I could keep an eye on them, so as they didn’t get too involved.

So, instead of taking them to church myself, I gave them the freedom to go with someone else. Many times I was asked by my children if they could go to church with their grandparents, and a few times with a friend. My answer was unwaveringly always the same: “It’s up to you.” (My wife could have expressed her opinion, but never did. She felt that it was my job to make the decision.) And they did go. I should also add that I never showed nor felt any disappointment in any of them for attending church. They were simply exercising their right, which would have been wrong of me to revoke.

I believe that for the simple reason that my children were never indoctrinated (although their maternal grandparents sure did try hard), they are now all adult atheists. I have always had a very good relationship with each of them and I’m sure that I always will. But if one or more of them had turned out theist, I’m sure that I would still enjoy a good relationship with them.

My oldest boy called me a week or so ago. During the conversation, out of the blue, he thanked me for never forcing religion on him. It’s odd because I would have thought that he would also have thanked me for never attempting to force him to be an atheist. I guess maybe it was implied. He has expressed this sentiment to me on other occasions, and he is not my only child to do so.

My advice is not to take your child to church, but give them the freedom to go with anyone of their choosing, and as often as they wish. Now, if they really do want to go to church and they ask you to personally take them, then, and only then, would I.

The most important thing is that children are not forced to believe one way or the other. I only wish that theist parents would do the same. Mine did not.

This question originally appeared on Quora. – the knowledge sharing network where compelling questions are answered by people with unique insights. You can follow Quora on Twitter, Facebook, and Google+.

More questions:​

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Nature: Our Most Important "Bank Account"

Unbroken tracts of forests connect soaring tropical glaciers in the center of the island to beautiful beaches ringing its coastline. Birds of Paradise, seen nowhere else on Earth except this region, inhabit these forests. So do hundreds of different tribes with entirely distinct languages, making this the most linguistically diverse area in the world.

That’s what I experienced earlier this month when I traveled to Papua, a province of Indonesia just south of the equator. Rarely have I seen so much forestland in one region of the world. Forests blanket almost 80 percent of the province, which is nearly the size of Montana.

The province is committed to ensuring that forests continue to thrive at a large scale. It recently committed to at least 70 percent of the province remaining under forest cover for all time. It is an impressive commitment–one of the boldest in the world–and particularly needed when the rate of forest loss across the globe is equivalent to 48 football fields per minute.

It wouldn’t have happened if local community members throughout the province had not taken stock of their forests. Where are they located and how do people and wildlife use and benefit from them? What areas are important culturally and which for economic purposes? They learned — or, in some cases, reminded themselves–that trees hold soil in place so the rivers that are a source of drinking water for people remain clean. That trees absorb carbon. And provide shelter to thousands of species. Without these and other “services” from nature, neither people nor wildlife will survive. Once there was a clear picture of why nature matters, saving the forests of Papua became a no-brainer.

Taking stock of natural resources is part of a growing movement led by the Natural Capital Project. WWF and our partners who are part of the project recognize that in order to save ourselves, we need to maintain our living assets also known as “natural capital.

We think of nature as a bank account. What is in it has value, which can be measured in terms of specific benefits, such as human health, economic development, food security and culture.

At the World Conservation Congress this month, WWF and others will talk about the exciting ways the results from natural capital assessments can be used. One way is to ensure areas of highest natural capital value are protected from the infrastructure tsunami that is heading our way. It is estimated that, over the next 15 years, $90 trillion could be invested in creating new roads, railways and other infrastructure, largely to meet the demands associated with an increasing population. Most of this would be in Africa, Asia and Central and South America. These countries also are home to much of the world’s most important biodiversity and forest lands.

WWF and others are working to influence how this money is spent so that roads, for example, are not built through prime tiger habitat in Myanmar. One of the best ways to do so is to open the eyes of investors, government leaders and others to our natural capital — the treasures that seem to be hidden in nature, but are essential to our survival.

Measuring natural capital also is a means for ensuring there is enough attention and funding to create and properly manage protected areas and other conservation systems. Currently, there is a significant gap — an estimated $2 billion annually in developing countries alone — between how much is needed for that and how much is available.

The Project Finance for Permanence (PFP) approach is an innovative way to fill the gap. A centerpiece of the PFP approach is a one-time “closing” that delivers pledged funds when all of the agreed upon conditions are met.

The largest one of these projects garnered $215 million for conservation in Brazil in 2014. These funds, which were matched more than 1:1 by the Government of Brazil, will help permanently protect 150 million acres of the Amazon. That project brought together a broad array of supporters including the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, the Government of Germany, the Margaret A. Cargill Foundation, the Global Environment Facility and the Government of Brazil. Key to securing the Brazilian government’s support was raising awareness about the Amazon’s natural capital, such as forests that help keep water flowing in rivers–the same rivers the country relies on for fisheries, local livelihoods, and energy production.

Through a new WWF initiative called Earth for Life, we hope to continue to build on the PFP approach to secure millions of additional acres of forests in protected conservation areas as well as indigenous and community-managed reserves. We are excited about this, as strong evidence shows this type of conservation management strongly correlates with stopping or slowing deforestation and forest degradation. Protected areas and indigenous lands in the Brazilian Amazon, for example, are likely to prevent an estimated 670,000 square kilometers of deforestation by 2050.

We have a tremendous opportunity before us — planning future infrastructure investments and ensuring that protected areas are not just on paper but, instead, are properly managed so they last forever. We can only do this with nature in mind. Not without it.

This post is part of a series on the World Conservation Congress taking place this week. Held every four years, it brings together about 6,000 people, including heads of state, government officials, business leaders, representatives from indigenous groups, scientists, academics, influencers, educators, artists and NGOs, from all over the world to discuss and decide on solutions to the world’s most pressing environmental challenges. To read all the posts in this series click here.

2016-09-01-1472755478-6620054-WW179797.jpg
Moss forest at an altitude of 2,600 meters in the Arfak Mountains Nature Reserve, Birds Head, West Papua, Indonesia. Photo Credit: © Ian Craven / WWF

2016-09-01-1472755521-7393002-WW1104038.jpg
Women from Phaung Taw, Myanmar cutting and washing fish by the Banchaung River. “We used to fetch drinking water from Banchaung River before. But since this year, the cleanliness of water has changed. There’s a lot of gold mining in the river. We don’t drink from it anymore.” Photo Credit: © Minzayar Oo / WWF-US

2016-09-01-1472755566-9765004-WW1104075.jpg
A man from Pyar Thar Chaung village in Myanmar washes his face as he collects water in different containers from a place that the villagers made to obtain water streaming from the mountain. The villagers living along the Banchaung River valley area used to be able to cosume water from the river for drinking but since last year they claim that water in the river has become noticeably polluted and most of them don’t use it for drinking anymore. Photo Credit: © Minzayar Oo / WWF-US

2016-09-01-1472755618-7881726-WW1104235.jpg
Girls from Kalone Htar village in Myanmar carry garden-grown fruits in a cart. Photo Credit: © Minzayar Oo / WWF-US

2016-09-01-1472755655-8782576-WW1104272.jpg
Vegetables being sold on a truck in Hein Dar, Myanmar. Photo Credit: © Minzayar Oo / WWF-US

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Life Transitions: Taking My Son To College

When we came home from taking our oldest son to college last week, it was to a dark house. I walked upstairs, looked into his room, and saw that the light was on. He often leaves his light on. So I walked into my boy’s now vacated room and turned off his bedside light. It was a sad moment.

Both Joy and I are very proud of our new college freshman and very happy with the remarkable school he has chosen and has welcomed him. We are glad to see him so happy. He is at a place where he is feeling “excited,” he kept saying, to begin his adult life, explore his way into the vocation he will feel called to, figure out his own faith journey, and, of course, play baseball (the love of his life) on a great college team. He is ready. But despite receiving compliments from others about helping him be so ready, we are both really feeling the changes, and the losses, of this great transition.

The president of his new college hosted a reception for the parents after we said our goodbyes to our children, and I told him afterward how “pastoral” he was for a couple of us pastor parents. He recalled that Elizabeth Stone quote: Having children is like choosing to have your heart outside of you and walking around, and said how counterintuitive it is for parents to ever leave their child — to do what we were about to do for the first time.

The goodbyes were significant and very meaningful. “Mom, put your sunglasses on,” he said. When I said, “I love you Luke,” he and I both knew it was from the bottom of my heart and that there is nothing I meant more. And I knew the return “I love you Dad,” from an almost 18-year-old young man looking right into my eyes was without reservation too.

We both have a great deal of trust for our son as he enters into a new life and schedule where he will be making his own decisions. He has always made good decisions and even helped the decisions of those around him. “Do what Luke does,” other parents would sometimes tell his friends.

But even with our love and trust so intact with him, our regular daily interactions will be so different now. I remember when I did about 200 talks a year, speaking almost every week across the country and the world. But as two children came into my life and moved from being toddlers to boys becoming young men, I became much more selective about my speaking engagements. Coaching their Little League baseball teams — for 11 years and 22 seasons — was a deeply bonding experience for our whole family, as their mother became the league commissioner alongside their dad coach. It also connected us to all our boys’ best friends and families; our house, deliberately chosen because it was actually right next to the baseball field, became the “clubhouse” for everybody.

Most importantly, I got to put my boys to bed most nights of their lives. Almost every night, we would say a prayer and goodnight with at least quick conversations about the day, the next day, or baseball. That’s why it was hard to turn off the bedside light when we came home — without being able to say goodnight.

Of course we have texted and talked since he began his new life at college, will do so regularly, and are already planning for fall break, Thanksgiving, and other visits. We went through the schedule on the way up in the car and he very sensitively added up all the breaks and vacation times he would be home with us and said, “I’ll still be home almost five months out of the year!” — of course, great news for us.

But this is indeed the big transition of becoming an adult — that’s what the college years have become for those who have the opportunity to go. My liturgically minded Episcopal priest wife has since reflected that a “rite of passage” would be helpful — especially for the parents, as she has talked with many of our friends going through the same thing.

As we walked the beautiful campus, saw and heard of all the resources available there, I couldn’t help but think about all the kids who still don’t have that choice and opportunity. Education really is the key resource, beyond family and faith, for human thriving and success. And those of us who have just taken our kids to college must redouble our own efforts to make education the affordable human right it needs to be for all of our children — because they all are our children.

As his mother tearfully pointed out during our dinner together on the way home, Luke won’t need us every day the way he has for so long. But he will now need us in different ways. And watching him grow, mature, make important decisions, choose his life direction, start and learn to love his own family, beginning to live into this new life will add whole new dimensions to ours, and to our relationship with him.

Our 13-year-old son, Jack, was to have a sleep over with a friend that night but called us to say he wanted to come home instead. That brought smiles to both our faces, and we both helped put him to bed and say goodnight. Here we go again.

Jim Wallis is president of Sojourners. His book, America’s Original Sin: Racism, White Privilege, and the Bridge to a New America, is available now.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Jackie Chan Gets An Oscar? I'm Sorry, But There Are Others More Deserving

What was the Motion Picture Academy thinking, giving an honorary Oscar to Jackie Chan, whose flourishing career from a commercial standpoint does not particularly represent the sort of rationale that merits an Academy Award.

Box office success has seldom by itself inspired selections for this coveted award. Plus, there have been quite a few nominees and winners even in the most consequential categories who have not been nor have they ever truly become movie stars.

Not to mention that it took years and years to get a special Oscar for major film luminaries such as Myrna Loy, Deborah Kerr, Kirk Douglas and Peter O’Toole, whose careers included significant cinematic achievements in addition to their prominence, yet never resulted in awarding them a competitive Oscar.

Also, consider superstars such as Warren Beatty, Robert Redford, Debbie Reynolds, Annette Bening, Harrison Ford, Albert Finney, Kim Novak, Doris Day, Samuel L. Jackson, Glenn Close, Brad Pitt, Tom Cruise and Johnny Depp, just some of the performers already past fifty who have never won an acting Oscar, nor have they received the honorary award, which has always been a way for the Academy to recognize these oversights, despite their having also appeared in any number of important movies.

I’m not sure why the Academy leaders felt moved to award Chan with this honor, but giving them the benefit of the doubt, perhaps they were drawing attention to a genre of the cinema world that has popular favor and entertains a large audience, in spite of the absence of critical acclaim.

Maybe if all the actors of distinction who have been featured in notable films had already been honored in the manner that the Academy traditionally has done, either by competitive or Board of Governor-granted awards, then it might be justified to lower their standards of excellence.

This is not meant as a personal slight against Chan and I applaud his financial success, but, as stated above, the Academy is noted for nominating and awarding achievements that stand above or at least alongside the best work done, regardless of its marketability.

The Governors dropped the ball and are simply currying favor among Chan’s many worldwide fans, which won’t even increase their interest in the telecast, as these Oscars are not presented on the Academy show, but merely to an audience at a private banquet, only tidbits of which are broadcast in the spring and usually with barely the briefest appearances on stage or in the audience by the recipients.

Sorry, Academy, but this was not an appropriate choice — not by the premier film organization in the world.

Michael Russnow’s website is www.ramproductionsinternational.com

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Colin Kaepernick Pledges $1 Million To Underserved Communities

Colin Kaepernick will donate $1 million to communities in need, the San Francisco 49ers quarterback announced Thursday. 

Kaepernick stayed seated while the national anthem played before a preseason game last Friday, which he said was a protest against structural racism and police brutality. He made a similar gesture before Thursday’s preseason game against the San Diego Chargers, kneeling during the song rather than sitting.

The promised donation will take the protest a “step further,” Kaepernick said at a press conference after the game.

“It was something I was thinking about to try to make sure I am not just talking about something, but I am actively being involved and actively trying to make a change in these communities,” he said.

He did not specify which groups he would be supporting, but made clear the donations would keep with his goal of helping people of color living in distressed communities.

“I’ve been very blessed to be in this position and make the kind of money I do,” Kaepernick said. “And I have to help these people.”

The NFL player and his girlfriend recently donated $60,000 worth of backpacks to students in the New York City neighborhoods of Harlem and the South Bronx, The Root reported. It’s not clear if this was part of the $1 million donation.

Notwithstanding the public backlash, Kaepernick’s protest seems to be gaining traction among players. Eric Reid, another 49ers player, joined him in the kneeling protest this week. Seattle Seahawks cornerback Jeremy Lane also did not stand when “The Star-Spangled Banner” was played before a preseason game Thursday night. 

Kaepernick explained at the press conference that he decided to kneel, rather than sit, during the national anthem after he and Reid had a conversation with Nate Boyer, an NFL free agent who served as a U.S. Army Green Beret. (Boyer published an open letter to Kaepernick in The Army Times on Wednesday, reflecting on both his discomfort with Kaepernick’s gesture and his sympathy for the quarterback’s intentions.)

The players concluded that kneeling would be a “way to try to show more respect for the men and women who fight for this country.” Boyer joined the 49ers on the sidelines during the anthem at Kaepernick’s invitation.

“I realize that men and women of the military go out and sacrifice their lives and put themselves in harm’s way for my freedom of speech,” Kaepernick said. 

While Kaepernick has faced heated criticism from many on social media, including Hall of Fame wide receiver Jerry Rice, he has also received an outpouring of support from U.S. veterans. Veterans backing Kaepernick have used #VeteransForKaepernick to get their message out.  

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Ava DuVernay Explains What Makes Her New TV Show So 'Radical'

At its core, “Queen Sugar,” the new series debuting this week from creator Ava DuVernay and executive producer Oprah Winfrey, is about a familiar topic.

“’Queen Sugar’ is a drama about family,” DuVernay says. “It’s something that allows us to be ourselves and see the ways that we interact with our own families.”

The family at the center of the show, the Bordelons, are African-Americans who have roots in Louisiana, where patriarch Ernest owns a sugarcane farm that he bequeaths to his children, three estranged siblings. But, as DuVernay says, the show has been written so that you don’t have to be black, Southern, rich or poor — or have an ounce of interest in farming — to find the Bordelons relatable.

“This family can be stripped of its location, of its race, of its class, and still our hope is that you’re able to see a bit of yourself in it,” she says.

Still, DuVernay asserts that there is something particularly unique about “Queen Sugar.”

“It’s a vision of family that is different from the vision that I feel is so often offered on American television. It is told through the lens of black people,” she says. “We don’t talk about race in every episode, but the very presence of black people in these roles is radical in and of itself, because we don’t see them. There’s a dearth of those images. Fifty percent of this country don’t see themselves reflected on television in the everyday way that we relay.”

DuVernay adds that the impact of this can’t be overstated. 

“It’s vital,” she says. “It’s important that these images are made, that they are amplified ― not only for black people. For everyone.

“This affects the way that black people see themselves, but it also affects the way that we are seen,” DuVernay continues. “These images allow us to draw closer to one another. They are powerful and they affect politics, they affect culture, they affect our everyday lives and the way that we relate to one another. In that way, I feel like this story is important.”

“Queen Sugar” begins with a two-night premiere airing this Tuesday and Wednesday, Sept. 6 and 7, at 10 p.m. ET on OWN.

Another look inside the series:

The “Queen Sugar” cast and crew opens up about the diversity of the characters and some of the intentional choices they made when filming the series

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.