We’re dealing with a bit of déjà vu today, as WhatsApp has decided to roll out a massive update to its years-old Status feature. Early adopters will remember that WhatsApp launched as an application for sharing your status with friends and family, which means this feature was in place before even messaging – now the main draw of WhatsApp – … Continue reading
Facebook is continuing its bid to bring a dash of Snapchat to all its apps. In a confirmation of rumors from the fall, WhatsApp has overhauled its status feature with an option to share photos and videos much like you would in Snapchat Stories. Muc…
Teddy Ruxpin may be one of the iconic toys of the eighties but, let’s face it, he was in need of a little update. After all, kids are used to looking at screens and a lot of them don’t even know what a cassette tape is. Wicked Cool’s new Teddy gets a…
We hate to be the bearers of bad news, but here it goes: Your eyelashes are probably covered in parasitic mites.
Your face can play host to two species of microscopic mites: Demodex folliculorum and Demodex brevis. These mites live in hair follicles, feasting on your body’s oily secretions.
Yummy.
It’s unclear how many people host Demodex mites, but research suggests that they become increasingly common as we age. Demodex mites rarely appear on babies, but samples of teens and adults have shown 70 to 100 percent occurrence of Demodex.
Before you pluck out each eyelash one by one, know that these mites likely won’t do you any harm. Demodex can eat, crawl around and reproduce on your face for years without causing any problems. However, when they build up in your lashes, they can cause eye irritation and inflammation. Demodex mites have also been linked to rosacea.
Many of us who have Demodex will never have an issue with these creepy-crawlies. But if you are diagnosed with an eyelash mite infestation, there are a few simple steps you can take. Use tea tree oil wipes to clean your eyelids and have your doctor clean the area as well.
As for the rest of us? We’ll just try not to lay awake at night thinking of the microscopic parasites crawling all over our faces.
Easier said than done.
— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.
Trevor Noah knows how strong moms can be.
While appearing on “The View” on Feb. 17, the “Daily Show” host spoke about his childhood in South Africa. Noah was born to a black mother and white father during a time when interracial relationships were illegal. His book, Born A Crime, recounts the experience of growing up as the product of a criminal act under apartheid.
During his interview, Noah discussed a childhood experience that he describes in the book. He was riding in a taxi with his mother and brother when the driver became angry that his mother had mixed race children.
“He was like ‘You have been with a white man. You are a whore. Today you’re gonna die,’” Noah said. The driver no longer stopped at any traffic lights, so his mother had to toss her older son out of the moving car and then jump out herself while holding his baby brother.
“She cocooned him perfectly,” Noah recalled. “Moms are just like ― I don’t even know how they do it. They’re just like superheroes without the capes.”
The talk show host added that his parents protected him in many ways throughout the political turmoil,
“My mom and dad were so good at creating a reality for me,” he said. “Your parents are powerful. Your reality is more powerful than what the reality is ― what you believe it is, is more powerful.”
Noah added that his mom’s parenting philosophy made him feel safe and valued.
“All she needed me to know is that I was loved,” he said. “I did not know how dangerous my world was, and that’s where I credit my mom for breaking those rules and cocooning me.”
— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.
Texans Shouldn't Use Chilean Flag Emoji To Talk About Their State, Lawmaker Says
Posted in: Today's ChiliAn emoji representing the nation of Chile is getting a chilly reception from at least one Texas lawmaker.
Last week, state Rep. Tom Oliverson (R) filed a resolution asking people to think more carefully about their use of the Chilean flag emoji, according to Reuters.
As you will notice in the photos below, the Texas state flag, on top, is fairly similar to the Chilean flag, on the bottom.
But close only counts in horseshoes, not in emojis.
Currently, there is no Texas flag emoji, but Oliverson doesn’t want his fellow Texans to think they can just substitute the Chilean state flag willy-nilly.
Oliverson explained the problem in the resolution:
All too often, the Chilean flag emoji is used as a substitute for the Lone Star Flag in text messaging and on social media platforms; the Chilean flag proudly represents its country but, despite its similarity to the Texas flag, it does not represent the State of Texas.
He then asked the legislature to “hereby reject the notion that the Chilean flag, although it is a nice flag, can in any way compare to or be substituted for the official state flag of Texas.”
He went on to “urge all Texans not to use the Republic of Chile flag emoji in digital forums when referring to the Lone Star Flag of the great State of Texas.”
Oliverson told the Houston TV station KPRC that he’s not advocating for the creation of a Texas flag emoji, insisting: “I don’t take a position on that.”
Some people are at Oliverson’s pet issue.
“For Pete’s sake, let the #txlege freshman pass his adorable little flag emoji bill,” political analyst Harold Cook tweeted, according to Reuters.
But Oliverson feels the resolution has already succeeded, even if it doesn’t come up for a vote.
“Even if the legislature decides not to hear it, we have achieved our objective,” he told Reuters.
However, he does hope it will help people ― especially Texans ― differentiate between the flags when using social media.
“I never thought in a million years it would get the kind of publicity it has gotten,” Oliverson told KPRC. “But it’s accomplished exactly what I set out for it to accomplish.”
— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.
The Refugees, Viet Thanh Nguyen’s fiction follow-up to his acclaimed debut novel, The Sympathizer, would be critically praised at any historical moment. But, as it happens, it arrived at this one: Just a couple short weeks after President Donald Trump signed an executive order that brought the U.S. refugee program to a screeching pause and indefinitely barred Syrian refugees from entering the country.
The collection, dedicated “For all refugees, everywhere,” is a compilation of nine haunting stories that follow the lives of refugees and their children, reflecting on how they process the trauma they’ve suffered and cling to fingerholds in both the old world and the new. As the swell of coverage suggests, it’s the perfect book to read at this historical moment in America, when a massive global refugee crisis is colliding with a government’s resistance to accepting them into the country.
“We need to understand how refugees are different [from immigrants] so that we don’t erase the specificity of their experience,” Nguyen recently told BuzzFeed’s Doree Shafrir. Instead of choosing to leave their homeland to pursue a different life, refugees have fled a home where it’s no longer possible to live safely. Their home, as they remember it, probably doesn’t really exist anymore. Simply staying, or even going back to visit, may not be viable options.
In The Refugees, characters are tormented by loved ones lost in the conflict that drove them to flee, sacrifices made to bring them to a safer place, and the distance of a homeland left under duress. The refugees are drawn with the kind of affectionate warmth that’s frank about flaws but accepting of the whole.
Even the most nominally comfortable refugees in Nguyen’s stories are nursing deep wounds. In the first story, a Vietnamese woman who fled with her family as a girl now makes a living ghostwriting for people having their 15 minutes of fame. She lives alone with her mother, but one day, someone unexpected arrives: her brother, who died 25 years ago during their escape. “You died too,” her brother’s ghost tells her. “You just don’t know it.” Wracked with guilt over her brother’s death, she’s become a husk, a vehicle for the stories of other people. Becoming refugees destroyed them both.
In “I’d Love You To Want Me,” an aging professor in a slow decline from dementia begins to call his wife of many decades by another woman’s name. Committed to his daily care, she bridles at the insult, and frets over who the other woman might have been. Her son Vinh sometimes checks on her; brought to America with his siblings at a very young age, he is utterly Americanized and alienating to her. But, she recalls, even on the tiny boat on which they escaped, she kept their hair neat and their faces clean. She knows how to keep up appearances in the face of the most catastrophic sufferings, or the most quotidian.
Nguyen’s stories are carefully structured, but it’s these psychological portraits that make them sing. The pacing of certain stories might be less than propulsive, or the climax a bit limp, but the people within them are crackling with life. The refugees are drawn with the kind of affectionate warmth that’s frank about flaws but accepting of the whole. “The Other Man” is an engrossing character sketch of a young refugee who’s taken in by a gay couple in San Francisco. In close third person, his visceral desires slip through, stifled beneath a mantle of courtesy and a conservative upbringing.
Other stories do combine sharply observed psychology with a forceful arc. In “The Transplant,” a man with a gambling problem, a bad liver and a crumbling marriage, Arthur, gets a new chance to make good after receiving an organ donation from an anonymous donor. After learning the name of the donor, Men Vu, Arthur and his wife hunt down one of his sons, Louis, to thank him. A friendship forms; a grateful Arthur lets Louis warehouse knockoff luxury goods in their garage. When he learns that the man he believed was his savior’s son may be no such thing, he slowly realizes that he’s once again lost control of his own life. Stymied in a bid to turn in or evict the black-market mogul, he surveys his garage:
Louis had conquered every square foot of storage for his fountain pens with their plastic barrels, his sunglasses without ultraviolet protection, his watches that kept perfect time for a day, his designer jackets without linings, his pants with hems that unraveled easily, his discs of pirated movies filmed surreptitiously in theaters, his reproductions of Microsoft software so perfect as to come with the bugs infesting the genuine item, his pseudopills that might or might not help, might or might not harm.
With the self-reflection of memoir and the clear-eyed, impartial narration of a history, Nguyen takes readers deep inside his characters in a mere few pages. What he finds there is humanity at neither its worst nor its best, but simply the well-meaning, flawed manifestation we can easily recognize ourselves in.
It’s easy to say that a book called The Refugees matters more than ever right now. It’s also true. For some readers, the collection will tell stories familiar to them, stories they’d recognize from their own families. For others, it will be eye-opening. If Americans have been confronted with a need to break out of their bubbles and experience realities outside themselves, this collection offers that jolt to many readers who have been able to take for granted their American citizenship. These stories make it harder to imagine refugees as threatening, spectral figures advancing like predators on our borders.
The Refugees is also just good. Read it now, or read it later ― but read it.
The bottom line:
In nine psychologically evocative short stories, Nguyen lays bare the trauma and emotional ambivalence that lie beneath sentimental or heroic tales of refugees.
What other reviewers think:
The New Yorker: “Nguyen’s narrative style — restrained, spare, avoiding metaphor or the syntactical virtuosity on display in every paragraph of ‘The Sympathizer’ — is well suited for portraying tentative states. His characters are emotional convalescents, groping their way to an understanding of their woundedness.”
The Washington Post: “This is an important and incisive book written by a major writer with firsthand knowledge of the human rights drama exploding on the international stage — and the talent to give us inroads toward understanding it.”
Who wrote it?
Viet Thanh Nguyen is the author of several books, including the novel The Sympathizer, which won a number of awards including the Pulitzer Prize for Fiction. The Refugees is his first story collection. Born in Vietnam, Nguyen grew up in America after his family fled the Viet Cong. He now lives in Los Angeles and is a professor of English and American Studies and Ethnicity at the University of Southern California.
Who will read it?
Readers drawn to immigrant stories, and those who hope to make sense of current events through fiction.
Opening lines:
“Fame would strike someone, usually the kind that healthy-minded people would not wish upon themselves, such as being kidnapped and kept prisoner for years, suffering humiliation in a sex scandal, or surviving something typically fatal. These survivors needed someone to help write their memoirs, and their agents might eventually come across me. ‘At least your name’s not on anything,’ my mother once said.”
Notable passage:
“What she wanted to say, but wouldn’t, was that he should not be frightened. He was not going to die here. But he was frightened, more so than he had ever expected to be. Before Michiko and the children, he believed he would die in an airplane or behind the wheel of a very fast car, anything involving high velocity and a sudden, arresting stop. Now he knew he would probably die with panic pooling in his lungs, in a place where he was not supposed to be, on the wrong side of the world.”
The Refugees
By Viet Thanh Nguyen
Grove Atlantic, $25.00
Published Feb. 7, 2017
The Bottom Line is a weekly review combining plot description and analysis with fun tidbits about the book.
— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.
Before Donald Trump became president, he sent several dozen tweets criticizing then-President Barack Obama for playing golf. “I just want to stay in [the] White House [and] work my ass off,” he told reporters in February 2016. That November, Trump acknowledged that he would play golf as president, but said he would “always play with leaders of countries and people who can help us.”
Since becoming president, Trump has played a lot of golf. Specifically, he has made six trips to the golf course in 30 days. This has caused some people to suggest Trump might be a hypocrite. The White House, which seems sensitive to those allegations, has responded by keeping the press and the public in the dark about Trump’s golfing ― sometimes literally, like on Feb. 11, when administration officials made an AP reporter wait in a room with black plastic over the windows while the president played golf.
Trump’s golfing this weekend was similarly secret. Late Sunday afternoon, Sarah Huckabee Sanders, a top White House press aide, told reporters Trump had played “a couple of holes” Saturday and Sunday.
It was more than a couple, and it wasn’t all with world leaders: Trump played 18 holes on Sunday with pro golfer Rory McIlroy, who’s ranked third in the world; sports agent Nick Mullen; and Richard Levine, a Trump friend, donor and frequent golf partner, McIlroy told golf blog No Laying Up.
A McIlroy rep confirmed he spoke to No Laying Up. And a photo of Trump, McIlroy, Yankees great Paul O’Neill, and sports equipment CEO Garry Singer offers more confirmation that McIlroy and the president at least spent time together this weekend:
In a statement on Monday, the White House said the golf outing lasted longer than planned. “He intended to play a few holes and decided to play longer,” Sanders said of the president. “He also had a full day of meetings, calls and interviews for the new [national security adviser].”
It should go without saying that the president of the United States is well within his rights to play golf. Many presidents have. But Trump has already spent eight of his first 31 days in office in Florida ― nearly all of it at his golf clubs. So if we’re not getting the whole truth about what happens there, and who he’s playing and meeting with, we’re literally missing a quarter of the presidency.
Maybe there’s a good reason the president doesn’t want the press witnessing his golf outings: He vehemently denies it, but he’s been repeatedly accused of cheating at golf. Boxer Oscar De La Hoya, actors Anthony Anderson and Samuel L. Jackson, and many others have accused Trump of cheating at golf.
Here’s how the president responded to Jackson’s charges:
— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.
Frances Bean Cobain Remembers Her Dad On What Would've Been His 50th Birthday
Posted in: Today's ChiliKurt Cobain will forever be sketched in our minds as the 20-something Nirvana frontman who pioneered the ‘90s grunge era. It’s hard to imagine what Cobain, who died at age 27 in 1994, would have looked like today ― Feb. 20, 2017 ― on what would have been his 50th birthday.
Many tributes poured in across social media on Monday to honor the late singer, but one in particular stood out.
His 24-year-old daughter, Frances Bean Cobain, wrote a heartfelt handwritten note and posted it on Instagram.
“Today would’ve been your 50th birthday,” she said of her dad. “You are loved and you are missed. Thank you for giving me The GIFT of Life. Forever your daughter, Frances Bean Cobain.”
Frances Bean, who was recently tapped to be a part of Marc Jacobs’ 2017 spring/summer campaign, was 20 months old when her father died.
— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.
From “Singin’ in the Rain” to “The Wizard of Oz,” musicals haven’t traditionally seen much love from the Oscars. But “La La Land” has changed all that, tapping into a desire for escapism and sending Hollywood scrambling to dust off its dancing shoes.
With a leading 14 Academy Award nominations including best picture, director, actor, actress and screenplay, Damien Chazelle’s love letter to Los Angeles is favorite to waltz away with an armful of Oscars on Sunday and revive musicals as a force to be reckoned with.
“The country is so sad right now and ‘La La Land’ is the only escapist movie,” said Craig Zadan, co-producer with Neil Meron of “Chicago,” the last musical to win a best picture Oscar in 2002.
“The others are artistically wonderful, but they are not necessarily peppy and boost you into a flight of fancy. The cards are all aligned for this to be the year of the musical again.”
It’s been a long time coming.
Musicals have long been snubbed in the top categories by the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences.
“That’s probably because musicals just aren’t as cool as they used to be and Academy members care a lot about what’s cool,” said Tom O’Neil, founder of awards website Goldderby.com.
“The miraculous thing about ‘La La Land’ is that it’s anti-cool ― shamelessly and joyously old-fashioned. It’s performing so well with Oscar voters because of its impressive craftsmanship,” he added.
Only 10 musicals have won the coveted best picture Oscar in the 89-year history of the Academy Awards.
The winners include “Chicago,” “The Sound of Music,” and “West Side Story,” but the losers list is longer. Along with “The Wizard of Oz” and “Singin’ in the Rain,” it also includes screen icons like Gene Kelly, Fred Astaire and Judy Garland, none of whom ever won a major Oscar.
It took director Chazelle, 32, six years to get “La La Land” off the ground, fusing a 1950s musical sensibility with a contemporary love story.
“I like to think that it’s providing an emotional experience. That was the goal of the movie ― to use the tropes of musical traditions to say something about what it means to be young and in love today, and what it means to be an artist and chase a dream,” Chazelle said.
Some awards watchers think “La La Land” could win up to 11 Oscars on Sunday, a feat that would tie it with all time record holders “Ben-Hur,” “Titanic” and “Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King.”
Its success is already changing perceptions about the genre at Hollywood movie studios, which have been slow to catch up with the trend elsewhere.
Shows like “Glee,” and live versions of musicals like “Grease” and “Hairspray” have brought in big TV audiences while Broadway hit “Hamilton,” with its rap twist on history and politics, has given musicals new respectability.
Movie musicals have often been associated with large budgets, big casts and long rehearsals for singers, musicians and dancers. “La La Land” however cost a modest $30 million to make and has taken $300 million global box office.
“Musical used to be a dirty word when you are going to these studio meetings. But the word has taken on a better patina lately. It seems people don’t look at you and throw you out of the office if you say you want to do a musical these days,” said Meron.
“I would say there is a buzz going round the studios right now that everyone is looking for the next musical,” added Zadan.
— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.