As Trump Sputters, Democrats Press Their Advantage On Infrastructure

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

WASHINGTON ― After the GOP’s stunning defeat on health care, and the turmoil it unleashed among lawmakers this week, Democrats find themselves with more leverage than ever over an unpopular president in dire need of a legislative victory.

As Donald Trump shifts his attention from Obamacare to tax reform and infrastructure, two issues with the potential for bipartisan compromise, Democrats reiterated this week that they are willing to make a deal. But only, they said, if the Trump infrastructure proposal includes real federal spending needed to overhaul the nation’s crumbling roads, bridges, and waterways.

“If it’s an infrastructure bill disguised as a tax bill, it’s not going to go,” House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) told reporters at a roundtable on Tuesday. ”That is to say, ‘You, Mr. Big Bucks, we’re gonna give you tax breaks to build something, which you would then own. Then you’re going to charge tolls, so the taxpayer is paying twice and you’re making a profit.’ That is not going to fly.”

Trump has yet to unveil his promised infrastructure initiative. Elaine Chao, his secretary of transportation, said Wednesday that it would consist of “a strategic, targeted program of investment valued at $1 trillion over 10 years.” The plan, which Chao said would be released sometime later this year, would include investment for “energy, water and potentially broadband and veterans hospitals as well.”

Chao did not, however, offer any details about how much federal funding the Trump administration would include in its infrastructure package (versus simply tax incentives), nor any details as to how the measure would be paid for. During her confirmation hearing earlier this year, Chao acknowledged the difficulty of securing new revenue streams and indicated her support for including tax breaks to private-sector investors who invest in infrastructure projects.

Most Democrats, however, are skeptical that funding vehicles of this sort, known as public-private partnerships, will be enough. In interviews with The Huffington Post on Thursday, several Senate Democrats said they would be willing to work with Trump if his plan includes real federal spending.

“My understanding is it’s going to be tax breaks for equity investments in infrastructure,” Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.) said of Trump’s plan. “The problem is not equity. There’s plenty of equity for anyone who wants to invest in infrastructure… but you’ve gotta have some of the revenue for some of these projects to pay back.”

“I don’t know anybody in the infrastructure business that thinks that tax advantage for equity and public-private partnership deals are what’s going to fix the problem,” Warner added.

Sen. Bill Nelson (D-Fla.), one of several senators who attended a meeting at the White House on Thursday, said he was for “all of the above.” But he warned that public-private partnerships alone “will not solve the problem of the infrastructure debilitation that we have in the country.”

Nelson said he spoke with Vice President Mike Pence and other White House staff about putting together a bipartisan infrastructure bill. The response he received from them was “very good,” Nelson said.

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) said Trump’s infrastructure package “would have to be big enough to make a dent, and it would have to have a mechanism for financing.”

Sen. Ben Cardin (D-Md.) also said that he “would like to see it as large as possible.”

Trump this week suggested that his administration supports some amount of direct federal spending, telling The New York Times Magazine his administration was “going to prime the pump” to get the economy going. But his preliminary budget, which the White House released earlier this month, delivered the opposite message. It proposed a 13 percent reduction to the budget of the Department of Transportation, including slashing funds to the successful “TIGER” grant program, which has been used to fund highway, rail, and transit projects.

It is difficult to see how a large federal spending package would make it to the president’s desk. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), Chao’s husband, has warned against trying to pass a “trillion-dollar stimulus” through a Republican-controlled Congress. A small group of conservatives in the House known as the Freedom Caucus has already flexed its muscles by helping derail legislation that would have repealed and replaced the Affordable Care Act.

The Trump administration is reportedly looking at moving legislation concerning tax reform and infrastructure simultaneously, using the promise of infrastructure spending to win over Democratic votes in order to pass tax reform. It is unclear, however, whether such a strategy could succeed, given the disagreement between Democrats and Republicans over how to fund infrastructure projects.  

Pelosi said Trump ought to drop his bungled efforts to repeal Obamacare and focus instead on legislation that would create jobs.

“I would forget all this stuff and just go for a big jobs bill,” she said. “Because he has nothing to offer. Two months-plus into his presidency ― you don’t need me to go into all the things we accomplished under President Obama by now. But where’s his jobs bill? Where’s his infrastructure bill?”

Jennifer Bendery contributed reporting.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Move Over Batman, A 'Batgirl' Movie May Be Coming From Joss Whedon

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

Batgirl, one of the world’s most popular superheroines, is set to get her very own film, according to Variety.

The outlet noted Thursday that director Joss Whedon is “nearing a deal” with Warner Bros. to write, direct and produce the project, which is currently untitled. 

The film will mark DC Film’s latest movie with a strong female lead. This summer, the studio will release “Wonder Woman,” starring Gal Gadot in the title role, and they previously released “Suicide Squad,” which saw Margot Robbie steal the show as Harley Quinn

Batgirl has been seen in various iterations over the years. As Variety notes, she first appeared in 1967 as Barbara Gordon, police commissioner James Gordon’s daughter, in “The Million Dollar Debut of Batgirl!”

Yvonne Craig portrayed the character in the “Batman” series starring Adam West, which aired from 1966 to 1968. She also played Batgirl in a 1967 TV short. And who could forget 1997’s “Batman & Robin” (directed by Joel Schumacher), which starred Alicia Silverstone as Batgirl alongside George Clooney’s Batman. 

No word yet on casting, but with Whedon at the helm, Batgirl is in good hands. Whedon previously directed “The Avengers” and “Avengers: Age of Ultron” for DC rival Marvel, and he’s responsible for blessing us with “Buffy the Vampire Slayer,” “Angel” and “Firefly.” 

Like we said, Batgirl is in good hands.

Tina Fey, Alec Baldwin, Mahershala Ali, Amy Poehler and a whole host of other stars are teaming up for Stand for Rights: A Benefit for the ACLU. Join us at 7 p.m. Eastern on Friday, March 31, on Facebook Live

You can support the ACLU right away. Text POWER to 20222 to give $10 to the ACLU. The ACLU will call you to explain other actions you can take to help. Visit www.hmgf.org/t for terms. #StandForRights2017

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Chinese-American AG Suing Trump Shares Personal Stories Of Being Stereotyped

HONOLULU ― Douglas Chin says his 18-year-old daughter views her racial background very differently than he did his own when he was growing up. As one of the few Asians ― and minorities ― at his high school in Washington state, Chin says he was always aware that he was Chinese-American. So when his daughter told him that she doesn’t really focus on her friends racial backgrounds, he took note. 

Her view of race makes sense, the 50-year-old Hawaii attorney general says. His daughter is mixed race ― half Chinese and half Caucasian ― and she was born and raised in Hawaii, one of the most diverse states in the country with the largest population of multiracial Americans.

But it’s the way she views the diversity around her that motivates Chin to keep fighting against the president’s controversial travel ban ― an order which Chin calls discriminatory against Muslims and people from Middle Eastern countries.

“Growing up as Americans, we’ve always been trying to appreciate and value diversity,” Chin told The Huffington Post. “To see that eroding and going away is chilling.”

Hawaii became the first state to file a lawsuit against Trump’s revised executive order which restricts travel from six Muslim majority countries. A federal judge agreed with Chin’s arguments in court that Trump’s order likely violated the establishment clause of the First Amendment, which forbids the government from discriminating based on religion.

On March 29, Chin went back to court to successfully argue why Trump’s ban should be halted indefinitely, saying the president’s “religious animus taints the entire policy.”

“We cannot fault the president for being politically incorrect,” Chin said in court. “But we do fault him for being constitutionally incorrect.”

Unlike his daughter, Chin did not grow up in Hawaii. He was born and raised in a predominantly white community in Bellevue, Washington. His parents were Chinese immigrants, but he says they never talked to their kids about their lives back in China and they never really emphasized the sacrifices they had to make in order to move to the U.S. 

“Me and my sister grew up very Americanized and [my parents] wanted to give us that American experience,” Chin told HuffPost. And while Chin’s family adapted to their community, Chin couldn’t escape being singled out as the “token Asian.”

“Growing up Asian, the biggest thing we all know is that there’s this stereotype that we’re scholarly, that we don’t get into confrontations, that we’re very quiet,” Chin said. He found it easy to “fit myself into that mold” because “that’s what everybody expected from me,” Chin added. “I was a lot more aware of being the token Asian friend.”

I remember not always feeling comfortable being seen around a lot of Asians, because it would look like I’m not really integrating with the rest of the community

This racial self-awareness carried into Chin’s years as an undergraduate student at Stanford University. “I remember not always feeling comfortable being seen around a lot of Asians, because it would look like I’m not really integrating with the rest of the community,” he said.

That all changed in 1989 when Chin moved to Hawaii, where Asians (including Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Thai and Filipino) make up 37 percent of the population, according to Pew Research. “All of a sudden, I wasn’t a minority,” Chin said.

In Hawaii, Asians can be “jocks, surfers and musicians,” Chin explained. “I never saw that growing up in Washington.” Free from the “token Asian” stereotype, Chin was able to live in Hawaii with a confidence he didn’t have before. He went on to receive his law degree from the University of Hawaii and worked at the Honolulu prosecutor’s office in 1996.

“When I was speaking to juries or presenting a case, I could have confidence knowing that [people aren’t] looking down on me because I’m Asian or think that I’m quiet,” Chin said. “They’re just going to listen to what I’m saying.”

Fighting Stereotypes By Fighting Trump’s Travel Ban

Chin believes that Trump’s travel ban would strengthen damaging stereotypes placed on people of Muslim faith. 

“When this ban first came out, what really jumped out to me is that it is marginalizing,” he told HuffPost. “It’s degrading people who belong to a certain nation [or religion]. It doesn’t matter if you’re a baby, fiancé or grandmother, if you’re from one of these countries then you’re presumed to be a terrorist.”

Trump’s executive order reminded Chin of the one instated by President Franklin Roosevelt after the Japanese attacks on Pearl Harbor, which called for the incarceration of more than 120,000 people of Japanese descent, many of whom were American. One such concentration camp was located in Honouliuli on the island of Oahu.

The executive order strengthened anti-Japanese sentiments throughout the country in 1942, which is what Chin says Trump’s ban would do for Muslim-Americans now.

“The worst thing that can happen is when the highest levels of government are [strengthening negative] stereotypes,” Chin told HuffPost. “Because what does that teach everybody? That everybody who’s a Muslim is a terrorist?”

Anti-Muslim sentiment has spiked since Trump started his presidential campaign. Last year, HuffPost tracked 385 anti-Muslim incidents. Mosques have become regular targets of vandalism. And in separate incidents last week, two men in the U.S. publicly threatened to shoot Muslim women in front of their children.

“I’ve been calling [the ban] a dog whistle. It’s a bad foreshadowing of a path we don’t want to keep going down.”

The attorney general also thinks that allowing Trump’s ban to roll out could’ve enabled more discrimination in the future. For example, what would happen if the president decided to add another country to the travel ban ― such as the Philippines, which he had suggested during his presidential campaign.

“I’ve been calling [the ban] a dog whistle,” Chin told HuffPost. “It’s a bad foreshadowing of a path we don’t want to keep going down.”

Chin understands that Trump’s order was intended to beef up national security, but he says there’s other ways to do that without violating the Constitution.

And as long as the ban appears to discriminate against people based on national origin or religion, Chin says he’ll continue to speak out against it until people see diversity the way his 18-year-old daughter does.

“Just like now, people don’t automatically say, ‘Oh, you’re Japanese? You must be an enemy because you bombed Pearl Harbor,” Chin said. “It took some time to get there ― and I want to be a part of the process that helps people get to that place.”

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

White House Aides Really Regretting Those Prank Calls To Nunes

President Donald Trump tweeted threats against members of his own party, no doubt a ploy to distract the media from that diabolical secret thing he must be doing…somewhere. The various factions within the House Republican caucus aren’t negotiating with each other on health care, but they are doing a good job of negotiating their fists into their own faces. And the Senate moved closer to approving Trump’s second nominee for labor secretary after the first one, a fast food CEO, got sent back because we asked for no onions. This is HUFFPOST HILL for Thursday, March 30th, 2017:

Like what you read below? Sign up for HUFFPOST HILL and get a cheeky dose of political news every evening!

JOE MANCHIN WILL VOTE FOR GORSUCH – Ol’ mavericky Manchin at it again. That cap & trade bill is probably still nailed to a tree somewhere. Jennifer Bendery: “Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) announced Thursday that he will vote for Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch, making him the first Democrat to announce support for President Donald Trump’s court pick. ‘Senators have a constitutional obligation to advise and consent on a nominee to fill this Supreme Court vacancy and, simply put, we have a responsibility to do our jobs as elected officials,’ Manchin said in a statement. ‘After considering his record, watching his testimony in front of the Judiciary Committee and meeting with him twice, I will vote to confirm him to be the ninth justice on the Supreme Court.’” [HuffPost]

THE CALLS ARE COMING FROM INSIDE THE (WHITE) HOUSE! We haven’t seen tradecraft this bad since “Burn After Reading.” Matthew Rosenberg, Adam Goldman and Emmarie Huetteman: “A pair of White House officials played a role in providing Representative Devin Nunes of California, a Republican and the chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, with the intelligence reports that showed that President Trump and his associates were incidentally swept up in foreign surveillance by American spy agencies. The revelation that White House officials assisted in the disclosure of the intelligence reports — which Mr. Nunes then discussed with President Trump — is likely to fuel criticism that the intelligence chairman has been too eager to do the bidding of the Trump administration while his committee is supposed to be conducting an independent investigation of Russia’s meddling in the last presidential election.” [NYT]

How to pronounce “Nunes.”

THE SPICER SPIN – Marina Fang: “Sean Spicer would neither confirm nor deny on Thursday a New York Times report that two White House officials may have been sources for House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes (R-Calif.). The White House press secretary dodged questions during his daily briefing by bizarrely claiming it was not his job to answer them. Spicer said reporters asking questions about it ‘assumes that the reporting is correct,’ but he did not deny the report outright. ‘In order to comment on that story would be to validate certain things that I’m not at liberty to do,’ he said.” And so forth, forever. [HuffPost]

PRESIDENT TRIES NEW STRATEGY: MEAN TWEETS – Daniel Marans: President Donald Trump warned the House Freedom Caucus on Thursday that he would work to unseat them in the 2018 midterm elections if they did not cooperate with the broader Republican agenda. The Freedom Caucus’ objections to the GOP Obamacare replacement bill, known as the American Health Care Act, proved decisive in killing it last Friday. The legislative defeat was a major humiliation for Trump and House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) who had repeatedly promised to repeal and replace Obamacare, officially known as the Affordable Care Act. Trump threatened the roughly 32-member group of ultraconservative Republicans with electoral reprisal on Twitter ‘if they don’t get on the team, & fast.’” [HuffPost]

TRUMP SICS MICK ON MARK – Threats! If only there were somewhere for Mark Sanford to hide. Emma Dumain: “South Carolina Republican [Rep. Mark Sanford] told The Post and Courier that Trump chose to convey this message through an intermediary: White House budget chief Mick Mulvaney, a former member of the S.C. congressional delegation, co-founder of the House Freedom Caucus and a friend. ‘’The president asked me to look you square in the eyes and to say that he hoped that you voted ‘no’ on this bill so he could run (a primary challenger) against you in 2018,’’ Sanford said Mulvaney told him.” [Post and Courier]

Trump also sent a mean tweet about the New York Times and said again that he’d like to change America’s libel laws, which are based on our Constitution, which Trump has never read.

CHRISTMAS COMES EARLY FOR MIKE PENCE – Let’s just say if this bill were a woman, he would refuse to be alone with it. Laura Bassett: “Vice President Mike Pence cast the tie-breaking vote in the Senate on Thursday to overturn an Obama administration rule and allow states to withhold Title X family planning money from Planned Parenthood…. ‘Mike Pence went from yesterday’s forum on empowering women to today leading a group of male politicians in a vote to take away access to birth control and cancer screenings,’ Dawn Laguens, executive vice president of Planned Parenthood, said in a statement.” [HuffPost]

REPEAL AND RE-SPLAT – Stop hitting yourself. Stop hitting yourself. Stop hitting yourself… Matt Fuller: “As House Republicans try to revive their ill-fated health care bill, leaders are stepping back from the negotiations, allowing factions of the GOP conference to work out differences among themselves even as some groups are questioning whether they should be negotiating at all. On Wednesday, the Tuesday Group, a collection of about 50 moderate Republicans, was in talks to meet with the House Freedom Caucus, a group of about three dozen conservatives, and discuss what changes both sides could swallow. But that meeting fell through after some Tuesday Group members argued within their caucus that the HFC wasn’t acting in good faith.” [HuffPost]

HuffPost Hill facts of life: The “Tuesday Group” of moderate House Republicans has met on Tuesdays in the Capitol basement for years.

The New York legislature is eyeing single-payer health care, and a key new supporter just joined the party, but the GOP-controlled state Senate seems like a pretty big obstacle. [HuffPost’s Ryan Grim, Daniel Marans and Jeffrey Young]

NEXT UP FOR PRUITT IS PUTTING DDT IN THE DRINKING WATER – If Scott Pruitt didn’t exist, liberals would had to invent him. Eric Lipton: “Scott Pruitt, the head of the Environmental Protection Agency, moved late on Wednesday to reject the scientific conclusion of the agency’s own chemical safety experts who under the Obama administration recommended that one of the nation’s most widely used insecticides be permanently banned at farms nationwide because of the harm it potentially causes children and farm workers…. The chemical was banned in 2000 for use in most household settings, but still today is used at about 40,000 farms on about 50 different types of crops, ranging from almonds to apples.” [NYT]

AT LEAST SEND THEM PHOTOS OF TRUMP FLIPPING THEM OFF – Justin Elliott: “When billionaire investor Wilbur Ross was going through the confirmation process to become President Trump’s commerce secretary, Senate Democrats wanted answers about Ross’ role as the vice chairman of the Bank of Cyprus, which has significant dealings with Russian oligarchs. The administration’s answer: crickets…. The lack of response to congressional letters is part of a pattern. Virtually every day, Democrats write the Trump administration demanding answers on a range of issues. And every day they are met with the sounds of silence…. The lack of responses also shows a hard truth for Democrats: As the minority in both the House and the Senate, they have no clear authority to compel the Trump administration to answer questions or release documents.” [ProPublica]

Like HuffPost Hill? Then order Eliot’s book, The Beltway Bible: A Totally Serious A-Z Guide To Our No-Good, Corrupt, Incompetent, Terrible, Depressing, and Sometimes Hilarious Government

Does somebody keep forwarding you this newsletter? Get your own copy. It’s free! Sign up here. Send tips/stories/photos/events/fundraisers/job movement/juicy miscellanea to eliot@huffingtonpost.com. Follow us on Twitter – @HuffPostHill

DELANEY DOWNER – Arthur Delaney and Omar Kasrawi: After President Donald Trump’s budget director suggested earlier this month that Meals on Wheels programs don’t deserve federal funding, elderly Americans took notice. ‘We have received calls every single day, from many of our clients, asking will their meals be cut, will they have food tomorrow,’ Peg Marshall, director of Meals on Wheels in Salem County, New Jersey, said in an interview. Thousands of Meals on Wheels offices around the country help deliver 1 million meals a day to homebound senior citizens. These organizations get about 35 percent of their funding from the federal government, with most of the rest coming from donations.” [HuffPost]

NORTH CAROLINA ‘BATHROOM LAW’ REPEALED. SORT OF. Sam Levine: “North Carolina Gov. Roy Cooper (D) on Thursday signed into law legislation to repeal a controversial law that bars people from using the restroom that corresponds with their gender identity and adds provisions to block nondiscrimination protections. The compromise on HB2, which the House and Senate passed Thursday, was quickly criticized by LGBTQ groups…. The bill lawmakers voted on Thursday includes some portions from HB2, including prohibiting municipalities from passing any ordinance regulating private employment or public accommodations. In the compromise, this prohibition extends until 2020.” [HuffPost]

BROWNBACK STRIVING TO BECOME MORE UNPOPULAR – Jeffrey Young: “Kansas Gov. Sam Brownback (R) rejected legislation on Thursday that would have used funding from the Affordable Care Act to expand Medicaid in his state to more low-income people. The majority-Republican Kansas legislature passed the bill earlier this week, which would have extended health coverage to an estimated 150,000 state residents via KanCare, the Medicaid program in the Sunflower State…. The Kansas House and Senate votes on the Medicaid expansion bill were just shy of the margin needed to override Brownback’s veto.” [HuffPost]

BECAUSE YOU’VE READ THIS FAR – Looks like Gizmodo found James Comey’s “secret” Twitter account.

DEMOCRATS WOULD LIKE DONALD TRUMP TO PLEASE VETO THAT INTERNET BILL – Please? Paige Lavender: “Senate Democrats are urging President Donald Trump to veto a bill passed earlier this week that allows internet service providers to share users’ web history. More than 40 senators, including Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), have signed a letter that will be sent to Trump Thursday arguing that the legislation will ‘seriously undermine the privacy protections’ of private citizens who use the internet.” Good luck, guys. [HuffPost]

COMFORT FOOD

– Mildly amusing patter from Jon Hamm and Jack McBrayer.

– An actual sharknado.

– The somewhat interesting carry-on items of flight attendants.

TWITTERAMA

@laurenduca: Ladies! Please stop criticizing Mike Pence’s unquenchable sex appeal and allow him to govern your uterus while he eats a piece of ham alone!

@Megan_Sass: Really creepy that I clicked on a article about defunding Planned Parenthood and an ad for Boss Baby took over my phone

@EmmaRoller: “Good tidings, member of the opposite sex. Can you help me plan my wife’s funeral?”

Got something to add? Send tips/quotes/stories/photos/events/fundraisers/job movement/juicy miscellanea to Eliot Nelson (eliot@huffingtonpost.com)

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Wild Scenarios Where Women Would Need To Have Dinner Alone With Mike Pence

Mike Pence said recently that he never has dinner alone with a woman who isn’t his wife. While it’s admirable that he holds his wife in such high regard, he’s making a lofty assumption that women are climbing over each other to dine with someone like him. 

To review, Vice President Mike Pence is very strictly opposed to a woman’s right to get an abortion. On Thursday, he cast the deciding vote allowing states to defund Planned Parenthood. And he believes women serving in the military is a “bad idea” because men and women can’t control themselves around each other.

Who wouldn’t want to have dinner with this gem! But we Americans are nothing if not optimists!

So here are scenarios where I think women would actually want or need to have dinner alone with the Monogourmet, Mike Pence.

1. You need his help to solve a historical mystery similar to the plot of “National Treasure.”

2. You’re playing his wife in a made-for-TV movie about the downfall of the Trump administration. Pence is out of work, so he’s playing himself.

3. Someone bet that you couldn’t have dinner with all the Mikes, and you brashly accept the wager, because you forgot about the vice president.

4. You’re an avid skydiver, and during one wild jump you crash through the roof of the Pence house, landing at the dining room table across from the vice president as he dines alone. Until the paramedics arrive, you probably shouldn’t risk further injury by moving. Just enjoy this time with Mike Pence, someone who might care even less about your health than the roof you just crashed through.

5. You’re a Russian spy.

6. You’re the spirit of an ancient goddess from a long-forgotten realm, and, unbeknownst to him, you’re trapped within the jewel on Mike Pence’s ring. And when he eats alone, he chews with his mouth wide open.

7. Mike Pence has obtained shape-shifting technology, allowing him to look like a perfect stranger and go out in public without drawing attention to himself. One night, he shape-shifts randomly into a special person in your life, and goes to dinner alone. You see whom you believe to be said special person and sit down to dinner with a disguised Mike Pence, who must have dinner with you to maintain the charade.

8. You are a time traveler and you’ve pinpointed a single moment in history that you believe is the cause of a devastating and disastrous future: a specific night when Mike Pence dines alone and leaves a really shitty tip. You disguise yourself as a very manly, patriotic American and convince him to let you join him. You offset his terrible tip and save the universe.

9. If you believe in the multiverse theory, then there are in fact infinite instances of all of us dining with Mike Pence. Forever.

 

The point is, ladies, no matter how fiery your passion, how great your lust, how bottomless your desire ― no matter how much you want him, Vice President Michael Richard Pence will simply never be yours.

Tina Fey, Alec Baldwin, Mahershala Ali, Amy Poehler and a whole host of other stars are teaming up for Stand for Rights: A Benefit for the ACLUJoin us at 7 p.m. Eastern on Friday, March 31, on Facebook Live.

You can support the ACLU right away. Text POWER to 20222 to give $10 to theACLU. The ACLU will call you to explain other actions you can take to help. Visit www.hmgf.org/t for terms. #StandForRights2017

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Here Come The Lawsuits To Stop Keystone XL Pipeline

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

Environmental groups filed two federal lawsuits this week seeking to block construction of the Keystone XL pipeline, which President Donald Trump recently approved. 

The State Department and other federal agencies shirked their responsibilities to evaluate the oil pipeline’s environmental impact, both lawsuits allege. They argue that the plunge in oil prices makes the project unviable and that new research shows oil from Canada’s tar sands is especially destructive to the environment. 

The lawsuits, which activists had promised after Trump green-lighted the pipeline last week, revive a protracted fight against construction that began during the Obama administration. Trump’s decision reversed former President Barack Obama’s rejection of the project. 

The Trump administration violated the National Environmental Policy Act by relying on “woefully out of date” information about plans to import oil from Canada’s tar sands region to Nebraska, according to a suit filed Wednesday by the Northern Plains Resource Council, the Sierra Club and other organizations. 

The State Department based its approval of the Keystone XL last week on an environmental study completed in 2014, the lawsuit said. That same report was used by the Obama administration to conclude the pipeline was not in the national interest and to deny permits to developer TransCanada in 2015. 

“The Trump Administration broke the law by arbitrarily endorsing a permit to build the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline,” Anthony Swift of the Natural Resources Defense Council said in a statement. “It ignored public calls to update and correct a required environmental impact statement that should have led to one conclusion. Piping some of the dirtiest oil on the planet through America’s heartland would put at grave risk our land, water and climate.”

Extracting oil from the tar sands is more energy-intensive than drilling, and the oil itself is considered one of the dirtiest fossil fuels. A gallon of tar sands oil releases 15 percent more carbon dioxide than “conventional oil,” according to the Union of Concerned Scientists.

Supporters, including Trump, say the pipeline will foster U.S. energy independence and will create jobs. Soaring U.S. energy production already has the country on track for producing as much as it consumes, and it’s unclear how importing oil from Canada aids that goal. Though the pipeline would require thousands of temporary construction workers, it would permanently employ fewer than three dozen. 

The second lawsuit, filed by the Indigenous Environmental Network and the North Coast Rivers Alliance on Monday, argues that the government should have replaced the 2014 environmental report with current data, and that officials failed to thoroughly consider impacts on both sides of the border. It further alleges that wildlife protections, such as the Endangered Species Act and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, were ignored. 

“Oil, water and fish do not mix. KXL poses an unacceptable risk to the Missouri River and its fisheries, including the nearly extinct Arctic grayling,” Frank Egger, North Coast Rivers Alliance president, said in a statement. “No oil pipeline is safe. One major oil spill, and the Missouri River and adjacent aquifers would be polluted for generations.”

Both lawsuits were filed in federal court in Montana, where the pipeline would cross the border into the U.S. The 1,179-mile pipeline would carry 830,000 barrels of oil per day from Alberta to Nebraska. 

A State Department spokeswoman declined to comment on the litigation. Officials from the Department of the Interior, which also was named as a defendant in both lawsuits, didn’t respond to HuffPost’s inquiries. 

TransCanada spokesman Matthew John said the company is focused on securing approval for the pipeline route in Nebraska, where the state Public Service Commission will vote on it. That review is expected to take seven months or more. 

“We’ll be working with stakeholders up and down the route to make sure that they’re informed on the project,” John told HuffPost. 

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

The Wirecutter's best deals: A Sony 55-inch XBR 4K TV drops to $1,290

This post was done in partnership with The Wirecutter, a buyer’s guide to the best technology. When readers choose to buy The Wirecutter’s independently chosen editorial picks, they may earn affiliate commissions that support their work. Read their c…

Tech's biggest players tackle climate change despite rollbacks

Some of America’s biggest tech companies say they’re still committed to battling climate change, Bloomberg reports, two days after President Trump signed a sweeping executive order that rolls back many Obama-era climate policies. Not only will it be…

Cut the Cord With Amazon's Top-Selling HDTV Antenna, Now Just $23

If you’ve tried an unamplified HDTV antenna (like the standard Mohu Leaf), but can’t quite pull in every channel you want, this 1byone leaf-style model includes a USB-powered amp that should add a few miles of range.

Read more…

FCC Takes a Hatchet to Program Providing Broadband Internet for the Poor

Yesterday, the Federal Communications Commission took on the real threat facing America: poor people who need to get online.

Read more…