Hasta La Gadget!

Facebook introduced Chatbots for Facebook Messenger a long time ago. The bots can be used by users to keep themselves information about package deliveries, news, sports updates, and more. According to a new report, at its upcoming F8 developers conference, Facebook is going to introduce Chatbots for Messenger groups. What this means is that the Chatbot functionality that’s currently limited to individual Messenger users will soon be available for group chats as well.

TechCrunch reports that Facebook has been working with top Chatbot makers to prepare for the launch. It’s going to open up the API so that more developers can start building their own group Chatbots for Messenger.

Even though the report goes quite a bit into detail about Facebook’s plans for this particular feature, the social network itself hasn’t confirmed anything at this point in time. In response to a request for comment by the scribe, Facebook just said that it doesn’t comment on rumors or speculation.

Group Chatbots will certainly come in handy. For example, Mets fans in a group chat on Messenger can add a sports bot so that all of them can be automatically updated about score changes, big plays, and additional news from the game.

The possibilities here would be endless and it would provide Messenger users with an additional incentive to start and engage in group chats with their friends and family. Facebook’s F8 conference is going to take place on April 18th in San Jose, California.

Facebook Launching Chatbots For Messenger Groups , original content from Ubergizmo. Read our Copyrights and terms of use.

It seems that Bluetooth headphones are a dime a dozen these days, but Marshall is hoping it catches your attention with its new Monitor headphones. Marshall certainly has the fact that it’s been waist deep in the music industry for 55 years going for it, but can these Monitor headphones stand out in a sea of other high-end sets? From … Continue reading

Robert Trojan was the chief executive at a banking trade group when he found something concerning: The organization’s accounting firm had an undisclosed conflict of interest, according to a lawsuit he filed against his former employer and Wells Fargo last month in New York’s Southern District.

A day after he formally raised his concerns, he was fired.

The lawsuit says that while he was running the Commercial Finance Association, which represents lenders who make loans on companies’ assets and invoices, Trojan found that the group’s auditor, Freed Maxick, wasn’t fully independent. The suit details how Trojan raised the issue of Freed Maxick’s undisclosed business with CFA members to three of the organization’s former finance staffers.  If an auditor was also working for one of the group’s members, it would effectively be working to audit itself. One of the people Trojan said he raised the issue with was CFA’s current president Andrea Petro. Petro’s full-time job is an executive vice president at Wells Fargo, where she runs the bank’s asset financing group. (Wells Fargo is one of the CFA’s biggest and most influential members.)

After raising the issue of its auditor’s lack of independence for three years with no results, Trojan complained in writing on Jan. 19. The next day, Petro called Trojan and fired him “effective immediately”, the lawsuit says, but not for cause.

In late 2016, Wells Fargo was roiled by a massive fake accounts scandal, in which employees said they had been trying to blow the whistle on since at least 2005. Wells Fargo later admitted that there were signs of retaliation against employees who reported wrongdoing.

Trojan’s lawsuit says that his dismissal was a violation of the CFA’s own whistleblower policy that prohibits retaliation. He alleges that the retaliation went beyond him losing his job. Petro sent an email to the CFA’s directors saying that Trojan had been fired for poor performance, according to an email filed in court. After Trojan’s lawyers told Petro that her email implied Trojan had been fired for cause, the lawsuit says that Petro sent the email again to a larger recipient list. Trojan says that emails were intentionally suggestive ― after the emails were sent, he says industry contacts reached out to him wondering if he’d stolen from the CFA or slept with a colleague.

The exact nature of the conflicts of interests that Trojan remain confidential and are not disclosed in court documents. However, if the case goes to trial, they would become evidence in court, a detail that indicates a settlement is the most likely outcome.

Wells Fargo, the CFA and Trojan’s lawyer declined to comment because the litigation is ongoing. Freed Maxick did not respond to a request for comment.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

After President Donald Trump’s budget director suggested earlier this month that Meals on Wheels programs don’t deserve federal funding, elderly Americans took notice.

“We have received calls every single day, from many of our clients, asking will their meals be cut, will they have food tomorrow,” Peg Marshall, director of Meals on Wheels in Salem County, New Jersey, said in an interview.

Thousands of Meals on Wheels offices around the country help deliver 1 million meals a day to homebound senior citizens. These organizations get about 35 percent of their funding from the federal government, with most of the rest coming from donations.

“We can’t spend money on programs just because they sound good,” Mick Mulvaney, director of the Office of Management and Budget, said this month in response to a question about Meals on Wheels ― even though the budget didn’t propose direct funding cuts for the program.

Marshall said she tells her clients that Trump’s budget is just a proposal, not something that’s about to become law. Even Republicans have said they can’t support the budget’s cuts to domestic spending.

“At this point in time, you’re okay, but we don’t know what the future holds,” Marshall said.

Jenny Bertolette, a spokeswoman for Meals on Wheels America, an umbrella organization for 5,000 local meal-delivery affiliates, said that after the budget came out, her inbox flooded with emails ― both from reporters and also people worried about their next lunch.

“As the inquiries from news outlets across the country were pouring in during the first 72 hours after the budget dropped, I was simultaneously getting messages from frightened seniors who saw the news, found my email address on the national website and were pleading for me to do everything I could to protect their only lifeline,” Bertolette said in an email.

Fortunately, there’s been an upside to the funding flap. The stories about Trump’s budget, some of them incorrectly saying Meals on Wheels would be wiped out, didn’t just panic seniors ― they also generated donations and volunteers. Bertolette said Meals on Wheels America typically gets $1,000 a day in unsolicited online donations. In the 72 hours after the budget came out, the organization got nearly 50 times as much. And in less than two weeks, 7,000 people signed up to volunteer through the group’s website, AmericaLetsDoLunch.org

Marshall said Meals on Wheels of Salem County delivers hot food to 150 people per day. One of them is Bruce Budd, a disabled former accountant who deals with tremors from Parkinson’s disease. He used to weigh 400 pounds, he said, but Meals on Wheels has tremendously improved his diet, helping him lose weight and control his diabetes.

“Now, because of Meals on Wheels, I’m having broccoli, and stuffed shells, milk, juice, a banana, and a slice of bread,” Budd, 58, said in an interview at his apartment in Pittsgrove Township, New Jersey. (Meals on Wheels programs typically serve people 60 and older, but many also help the disabled.)

Budd uses a walker and has some difficulty moving around his place, not to mention going to the store. He eagerly awaits his daily meal delivery, particularly because of the social interaction with the volunteers who bring the food.

“I look forward to it, I’m passionate about it, and them is fighting words, if they’re talking about taking it away from me,” Budd said.

Though he was initially alarmed by stories about the Trump administration targeting Meals on Wheels, Budd said he followed the news closely and learned that the budget didn’t directly target his lunch. (Trump’s budget did propose killing several other antipoverty programs, including one that provides a small amount of funds for senior nutrition services in some states, which is why reporters asked the Trump administration about cutting Meals on Wheels.)

In a statement to The Huffington Post last week, a spokesman for the Office of Management and Budget praised Meals on Wheels but stopped short of saying the Trump administration would shield the program’s funding.

A strange thing about the budget director’s characterization of Meals on Wheels as wasteful spending is that several studies have suggested home-delivered meals help senior citizens remain in their own homes. Independent living can save the government money because nursing homes cost Medicaid a fortune. Not that simply providing food for the elderly isn’t itself a noble goal. 

“We don’t want to see our clients going into an institution simply because they cannot prepare their food or can’t shop for themselves to get the food into the house,” Marshall said.

Marshall, who voted for Trump, said she didn’t think the administration had thought through its position on Meals on Wheels.

“I know I’m only as good as the information and the facts that I receive and the people that I’m surrounded with,” she said. “I’m not sure that he got the right facts, or the people that are in leadership that are making those decisions have all the facts about the value of our program.”

Meals on Wheels programs and their clients may be sympathetic, but that doesn’t make them invulnerable to budget cuts. In 2013, budget cuts reduced federal funding for senior nutrition programs, though Congress later moved to replace the money. The Trump administration is still pushing steep domestic spending cuts even after members of Congress panned its budget.

Harry Emig volunteers as a driver for Meals on Wheels of Salem County because he benefited from Meals on Wheels himself when he had cancer a few years ago. After getting healthier, he said, he wanted to give back. He brought food to Budd one day last week.

“They get a pretty tough life, you know, so it’s our job to go in, and if they want to talk, we do that, you know, comfort ‘em, deliver their meals,” Emig said. “Who knows, I might be in the same boat down the road.”

The video was produced by Omar Kasrawi and Samara Mackereth, edited by Ethan Kirby and shot by Shane Handler and Artem Golub.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

They are funny ― but are they the funniest?

You’ll have to decide for yourself as you watch Burger Fiction’s supercut of the “40 Funniest Movie Scenes.”

We’re partial to the farting outburst in “Blazing Saddles,” but that’s just old-school us.

And we don’t have to undergo any hot wax to be convinced moments from “Dumb and Dumber,” “Bridesmaids” and “The 40 Year Old Virgin” belong, too.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.