Judge Approves $25 Million Settlement Of Trump University Lawsuit

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

<span class="articleLocation”>A U.S. judge on Friday approved a $25 million settlement to resolve a class action lawsuit that claimed fraud against President Donald Trump and his Trump University real estate seminars.

The ruling from U.S. District Judge Gonzalo Curiel in San Diego concluded a lengthy and contentious lawsuit that played a prominent role in the presidential campaign last year.

The Trump University students, who paid as much as $35,000 for the seminars, claimed they were lured by false promises that they would learn Trump’s investing “secrets” from his “hand-picked” instructors.

One Trump University student objected to the deal, in particular a provision blocking students from opting out of it. She said in court papers she would like to seek full recovery from Trump, plus punitive damages and other relief.

An attorney for that student could not immediately be reached for comment.

During the campaign, Trump vowed to continue fighting the fraud claims but agreed to the settlement soon after he was elected. He has admitted he did not personally select the instructors, but his lawyers have described the claim as sales “puffery.”

Last year, Trump accused Judge Curiel of bias based on the Indiana-born judge’s Mexican ancestry.

In his ruling on Friday, Curiel called the $25 million settlement “extraordinary” in that it represented an estimated 80 percent recovery for the students.

“The amount offered in settlement provides significant and immediate recovery,” Curiel wrote.

(Reporting by Dan Levine in San Francisco; Editing by Toni Reinhold)

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

China’s New Tactic To Suppress Muslim Separatists: Banning Veils And 'Abnormal' Beards

The Uyghur people of China’s far-west Xinjiang region have long complained that government rules and policies discriminate against them. Things just got worse.

Yesterday authorities in the violence-prone region passed a new regulation that will surely lead to more resentment among the 10 million or so Uyghur, most of whom are Muslim and speak a Turkic language. They comprise about 45 percent of Xinjiang’s population; 40 percent are Han Chinese.

Taking effect on Saturday (April 1), the regulation bans over a dozen behaviors that authorities deem “abnormal.” Among them:

  • Refusing to watch state-controlled television
  • Refusing to listen to state-controlled radio
  • Wearing an “abnormal” beard
  • Wearing a veil
  • Preventing children from receiving national education
  • Using religious instead of legal procedures to marry or divorce
  • Meddling in other people’s weddings, funerals, or inheritance
  • Interfering with the enforcement of family planning policies
  • Intentionally damaging national identity cards, household registration books, or the Chinese currency

Of course it’s unclear how authorities would know whether someone has watched enough state TV or meddled in another person’s wedding. But then many laws in China are vague, which is useful to authorities wanting a wide berth in interpretation.

The new regulation builds upon similar ones passed in recent years to control perceived safety threats from an increasingly restive population. The administrative region, which borders Russia and several Central and South Asian countries, has a history of protests by groups who want to create an independent state named East Turkestan, and of violent crackdowns on the unrest by Chinese authorities.

Earlier this month a video, purportedly from ISIL, seemed to show Uyghur members training in Iraq. The video said the group would plant its flag in China and blood would “flow in rivers”—heightening alarm in Beijing.

In August 2014 a new rule in the region’s city of Karamay prohibited people with a certain look from boarding buses. Specifically anyone wearing:

  • Head scarves
  • Veils
  • Long beards
  • A jilbab (a loose-fitting garment)
  • Clothing with the crescent moon and star

(The latter is a symbol of Islam, one used on various national flags and also by separatist factions in the Uyghur population.)

A month earlier, authorities passed a new rule preventing bus passengers from carrying a variety of items, including yogurt, water, and cigarette lighters. Last fall authorities implemented rules banning religious activities in schools, and prohibiting parents from enticing or forcing their children to join religious activities.

And in the region’s Bayingolin Mongol Autonomous Prefecture last month, authorities initiated a program requiring all vehicles to have a GPS system installed for government tracking—and requiring gas stations to deny service to ones without it. The move was widely seen as targeting the area’s Muslim residents.

The voices of those seeking reconciliation have also been silenced. In September 2014 the government jailed for life Ilham Tohti, a prominent scholar who encouraged better communication between the Han Chinese (who make up about 90 percent of China) and the Uyghur community. They charged Tohti, winner of major human rights prize, with being a separatist. 

This article originally appeared on Quartz. Like Quartz on Facebook or sign up for the Quartz Daily Brief.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin Makes A Joke Out Ethics Rules

Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin defended his comments last week promoting the “Lego Batman” movie, which he financed, in a letter to the Office of Government Ethics obtained by NBC News.

Mnuchin acknowledged that he should not have made the comment (federal employees are prohibited from using their jobs to sell products), but said “it was not my intention to make a product endorsement.” Mnuchin says in the letter that he takes his ethical responsibilities seriously.

The letter comes after Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), ranking member of the Senate Finance Committee, requested the ethics office review the treasury secretary’s comments.

In an interview last week, Mnuchin plugged his “Lego Batman” movie with a wink. “I’m not allowed to promote anything that I’m involved in. So I just want to have the legal disclosure, you’ve asked me the question, and I am not promoting any product,” he said, before delivering the punchline: “But you should send all your kids to ‘Lego Batman.’”

In a statement to NBC News, a Treasury Department spokesman said Mnuchin’s plug for his movie was “made in jest and not intended to be a product endorsement of the Lego Batman movie. We think that’s clear in context.”

And that is indeed a fair description of what Mnuchin was doing. As the president uses the highest public office to enrich his family business and a top aide is allowed by the White House counsel to promote the family’s products without consequence, it’s also refreshingly honest to hear the Trump administration say that ethics rules are officially a joke.

The Office of Government Ethics did not immediately return a HuffPost request for comment.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

'Time Out' Made Cringe-Worthy Dumpling Vid And Asians Are Losing Their Sh*t

One recent food video is making Asians simmer with anger. 

People across the internet are destroying a Time Out London video about soup dumplings from Dumplings Legend, a restaurant in the U.K. 

The video not only introduced the beloved Shanghai dish to viewers as if it were a new discovery ― poking and tearing them apart with chopsticks and incorrectly calling them “exploding dumplings” ― it also compared the act of eating them to popping pimples. 

Cringing yet? 

Well Asians everywhere certainly have been. And though the outlet issued somewhat of an apology, saying sorry “to anybody who was peeved” by the video, people continued to be vocal about how they felt regarding the outlet’s seriously flawed interpretation of the food. 

Angry soup dumpling aficionados spoke out through a variety of social media outlets and the Gothamist went so far as to call the video “heartbreaking.” Some criticized the horrific way the dumpling-eating method was demonstrated in the video as well as the outlet’s gross take on consuming the food. Others offered up helpful tips on how to really eat the delicacy.

But what some viewers took most issue with was actually the way the traditional food, that’s steeped in history, was presented ― as if it were “the next cool trend.” Though it briefly mentioned the Shanghai classic has roots back in the 1800s, social media users slammed the video for its “cavalier” explanation of the food and its lack of respect for the culture the dumplings come from. 

Unfortunately, the act of “introducing” something into the mainstream that’s actually existed in another culture for years has been repeated so many times, there’s a term for it: “Columbusing.” And witnessing pieces of culture get “columbused” is painful for people of color, NPR points out ― especially when there’s been no attempt to understand the historical complexities behind the dish, stripping it of its cultural significance. 

“When outsiders use tweezers to pick out the discrete parts of your culture that are worthy of their attention, it feels like a violation,” the outlet noted.

What’s more, these ethnic foods that are now framed as fashionable by white people were often “scorned” when made by the hands of immigrants, the Washington Post noted. 

“This is not just about westerners eating food ‘incorrectly,’” Facebook user Christina Chan echoed in a comment. “It’s also quite important as many traditional ethnic Asian foods were once considered “weird” or “gross,” until a mainstream (aka white) body decided that it wasn’t.”

Time Out London mentioned that going forward, they’d encourage “knowledgeable food-lovers of China and Asia” to offer up some food suggestions and the proper ways to eat the dishes. It’s a start, but commenters also mentioned how the outlet should probably look into hiring more diverse voices on top of that. 

In case you’re new to the soup dumplings, Gothamist has provided us all with a nice guide to eating the delicious treat. Trust us, none of these methods look like zit-popping. 

Now, can we have a moment of silence for all the soup dumplings whose lives were lost in vain during the making of that video? 

 

 

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

2 Democratic Senators Say Neil Gorsuch Refused To Meet With Them

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

WASHINGTON ― President Donald Trump’s Supreme Court nominee, Neil Gorsuch, has refused to meet with at least two Democratic senators, Tammy Duckworth (Ill.) and Catherine Cortez Masto (Nev.), in the weeks leading up to his confirmation vote.

Both senators noted this detail in statements announcing they plan to vote against him.

“Unfortunately, Judge Gorsuch has not made the effort to meet with me in person to answer the serious questions I have about his record and he in fact cancelled a meeting we had previously scheduled,” Duckworth said. “I refuse to vote to end debate on a nominee who refuses to provide any answers to my questions.”

“Unfortunately, after requesting a meeting with the Judge for several weeks, he has refused to honor this request,” Cortez Masto said. “The U.S. Constitution has entrusted the Senate with the role of advising the President on the highest court of the land and in refusing to meet with me, he has disrespected our nation’s founding principles and pillars core to our democratic institutions.”

In Duckworth’s case, the two had a meeting scheduled on a Wednesday, but Gorsuch canceled and did not provide any dates or times that worked for him to reschedule. Duckworth’s office “made multiple efforts and offered multiple times/dates for both the first meeting and for rescheduling after the cancellation,” according to her office, but Gorsuch didn’t follow up.

“If Judge Gorsuch had wanted to meet with the Senator, he shouldn’t have cancelled their meeting without offering any additional times that worked for him,” Duckworth spokesman Ben Garmisa said via email.

Cortez Masto spokesman Rey Benitez said Gorsuch’s team told her office it had to justify why the Supreme Court nominee should meet with the senator.

“They said, ‘Give us a good reason why the judge should sit down with the senator,’” Benitez said. “That’s ridiculous that they’re asking us to do that. She’s a U.S. senator and she’s trying to do her job.”

Another Democratic senator, Kamala Harris (Calif.), did not meet with Gorsuch either. She never got an offer to meet with him, per her office.

A White House spokesman, who spoke only on background, said Gorsuch has met with most senators and is still open to meeting with Cortez Masto.

“Judge Gorsuch has met with nearly 80 Senators,” the spokesman said in an email. “In early February, the White House nominations team reached out to Senator Cortez Masto requesting a meeting be scheduled. The Judge was more than willing to meet with the Senator and both sides have been trying to find a mutually agreeable date that would work.”

Christopher Kang, a former White House staffer who led Senate outreach for the confirmations of Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan, said his team offered a courtesy meeting to all 100 senators.

“These meetings are about more than just trying to win votes,” Kang wrote in a Thursday blog post on HuffPost. “They are about respect for the Senate as an institution ― a co-equal branch of government that is constitutionally responsible for providing advice and consent on Supreme Court nominations. If you don’t understand this, that raises serious questions about your judgment and independence.”

Latino advocacy groups are outraged by the perceived slights to Cortez Masto, who is the first Latina senator, and to Duckworth, a decorated veteran.

“Sen. Cortez Masto represents the growing diversity of our nation. She has a right to ask questions of the nominee to the highest court in the land,” said Ben Monterroso of Mi Familia Vota, a nonprofit focused on civic engagement in Latino and immigrant communities. “Why won’t he meet with two senators who represent the diversity of our country? Is he afraid he will be asked about women’s rights?”

“The refusal to meet with Senator Cortez Masto seems to demonstrate unwarranted hostility, extreme obtuseness, or acquiescence in a political strategy marked by disrespect for the Latino community,” MALDEF President Thomas Saenz said. “While we hope that mere oversight may explain Gorsuch’s refusal to meet with the two senators, the record to date suggests otherwise.”

Gorsuch’s confirmation vote is set for April 7, and it could be dramatic. Democrats are vowing to deny him the 60 votes he needs to move forward, and Republicans are threatening to blow up Senate rules to force through his confirmation on 51 votes. The partisan nastiness of it all is making senators sad.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

New Yorker Cartoon Goes Out To All The Diehard Oxford Comma Lovers

A New Yorker cartoon by Emily Flake is giving life to grammar obsessives today, by illustrating just how consequential an Oxford comma can be. 

For anyone who doesn’t spend sleepless nights tossing and turning over the controversial punctuation mark, a brief explainer: the Oxford comma is the last comma in a list, that comes before the “and” or the “or.” Some think it’s necessary, others redundant, and many just don’t care. (What do you think?)

The lovely lady pictured below, however, seems pretty firmly in camp “necessary.”

We beg to differ. A cartoon by @eflakeagogo. #TNYcartoons

A post shared by The New Yorker Cartoons (@newyorkercartoons) on Mar 31, 2017 at 7:39am PDT

Earlier this month, the contentious comma was the deciding factor in a $10 million lawsuit involving overtime pay for dairy farmers. When announcing his verdict, the Judge opened with: “For want of a comma, we have this case.”

Given recent events, a comma-induced divorce doesn’t sound entirely implausible. We just wonder who will get the dogs, House and Car. 

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

Tina Fey, Alec Baldwin, Mahershala Ali, Amy Poehler and a whole host of other stars are teaming up for Stand for Rights: A Benefit for the ACLU. Join us at 7 p.m. Eastern on Friday, March 31, on Facebook Live

You can support the ACLU right away. Text POWER to 20222 to give $10 to the ACLU. The ACLU will call you to explain other actions you can take to help. Visit www.hmgf.org/t for terms. #StandForRights2017

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

René Pérez Describes How He And Lin-Manuel Miranda Found Out They're Related

René Pérez definitely has the hook-up for “Hamilton” tickets. 

The former vocalist for Calle 13, best known as Residente, hasn’t shied away from showing his love for his third cousin Lin-Manuel Miranda on Instagram. But there was a time when Pérez didn’t know he was related to the creator of “Hamilton” at all. 

The Puerto Rican artist appeared on “The Daily Show” Wednesday night to discuss his new album with host Trevor Noah. Towards the end of the interview, the host said he was shocked to find out Pérez and Miranda were cousins. 

Pérez then explained how he found out he was related to Miranda long after meeting him.

“I met him way before ‘Hamilton,’ when he was doing ‘In The Heights’ like nine years ago,” he said. “My grandma, she use to tell me all the time ‘Oh, you have your cousin in New York and you don’t know about him.’ And then when he started to write ‘In The Heights’ we met in Puerto Rico.”

That’s when Pérez says his mother saw Miranda’s face and revealed the two artists were actually family. Both of the artists were equally surprised. 

“It’s not every day you find out you’re related to one of the most famous rappers in the world,” Miranda told the New York Times in January

During his interview with Noah, the former Calle 13 frontman also recalled the moment Miranda first told him the idea of creating a musical based on the life of Alexander Hamilton.

And Pérez is certainly a fan of his third cousin, in the past he’s raved about Miranda’s rapping skills on Instagram.

“Here with my cousin Lin Manuel, the best rapper in the family,” he wrote in a caption on July 2016.

Greatness definitely runs in the family. 

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

'Zelda: Breath of the Wild' patch improves docked Switch performance

The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild is a near-perfect game, but its performance on the Nintendo Switch is far less so. While it plays smoothly in handheld mode, it’s not unusual to see lower frame rates when you dock the console. Mostly, that’s b…

'Final Fantasy XIV' live action drama heads to Netflix

Japan’s unique Final Fantasy XIV-based drama is making its way to the rest of the world thanks to Netflix. Daddy of Light isn’t really an adaptation of the hit MMO — it’s a live-action show that focuses on a father and son who play the game together…

Apple releases new colorful Apple Watch ad

 Apple just released a new video ad on its YouTube channel for the Apple Watch Series 2. There are two interesting things about this ad. It’s a colorful, cheerful clip that wants to turn the Apple Watch into a pop culture symbol. And it focuses on the fitness features of the Apple Watch, proving that Apple thinks about the device as an activity tracking device first and foremost. Apple… Read More