Florida Supreme Court Signs Off On Effort To Restore Voting Rights To Over 1 Million People

Florida’s state Supreme Court on Thursday approved language for a proposed amendment to the state Constitution that would restore voting rights to felons after they complete their sentences.

More than 1.6 million Floridians can’t vote because the state strips felons of their voting rights unless they receive clemency and have their rights restored by the governor. With the state Supreme Court’s approval, activists will now have to work toward getting nearly 700,000 signatures on a petition in order to get the measure on the 2018 ballot.

If the amendment gets the approval of 60 percent of Florida voters, felons would be able to vote after completing their sentences, probation or parole. Individuals who committed murder or sexual offenses would still permanently lose their right to vote.

“We are very pleased that the Florida Supreme Court has approved the language for this important constitutional amendment,” Kirk Bailey, political director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Florida, said in a statement. “The language approved today reflects the belief that those who have committed crimes should be punished, but once they have fulfilled the terms of that punishment, they should be restored to full citizenship.”

“Florida is one of only three states with a lifetime ban on voting,” Bailey went on. “This amendment modernizes Florida’s criminal justice rules by bringing our state in line with others nationwide.”

Twenty-one percent of Florida’s African-American voting population can’t vote because of the law. Florida Gov. Rick Scott (R) has made it more difficult for felons to get their rights restored.

“People with past convictions are living and working in Florida’s communities just like their neighbors,” Kwame Akosah, an equal justice fellow at the Brennan Center for Justice, said in a statement. “They should have a second chance to participate in their democracy and make their voice heard.”

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

EPA Chief Scott Pruitt Continues Dirty Energy Tour

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

WASHINGTON — The man in charge of protecting human health and the environment traveled to one of America’s oldest coal-fired power plants on Thursday, continuing what is shaping up to be a dirty energy tour.

Environmental Protection Agency head Scott Pruitt’s visit to the Thomas Hill Energy Center, in Clifton Hill, Missouri, comes one week after he traveled to a Pennsylvania coal mine to formally launch the EPA’s “Back-to-Basics agenda.”

It also comes a day after the American Lung Association released its annual air quality report, which found nearly 4 in 10 Americans are breathing dangerous levels of pollution and warned the Trump administration that sidelining efforts to curb emissions would jeopardize public health.

Pruitt echoed the message he delivered on April 13 at Pennsylvania’s Harvey Mine. “The war on coal is over; the war on fossil fuels is over,” he told workers at the 1,153-megawatt facility in Missouri, according to the Moberly Monitor-Index. 

“Last week, I went underground in a Pennsylvania coal mine, and today I got a firsthand look at a Missouri coal-fired power plant,” Pruitt said in a statement released after his visit. “Coal is, and will continue to be, a critical part of America’s energy mix.”

The “Back-to-Basics” agenda purports to refocus the EPA in a way that promotes economic growth while continuing to protect the planet. But Pruitt’s tour to promote the plan has, at least thus far, been a celebration of the coal industry, which the new EPA chief said was subject to a “regulatory assault” under former President Barack Obama.

“I saw today just how important this fuel source is to affordable electricity and economic development in the region, especially in the agriculture community,” Pruitt said Thursday. 

Late last month, President Donald Trump, surround by coal miners, signed an executive order instructing the EPA to review Obama’s Clean Power Plan, a policy limiting greenhouse gas emissions from power plants. The order also took measures to further protect the coal industry, namely by instructing the Department of the Interior to lift a temporary ban on coal leasing on federal lands that the Obama administration put in place last year.

Pruitt’s visit to a coal-fired plant comes as little surprise, given the administration’s attempts to “throw out life-saving protections that keep pollution out of our air and water,” Andy Knott, a senior representative of the Sierra Club’s Beyond Coal Campaign, said Thursday.

“This plant represents the Trump and Pruitt vision for America’s energy future: filthy, fifty-year-old coal plants that willingly pump out deadly pollution unabated while fossil fuel executives get rich and the rest of us get sick,” Knott said in a statement.

A 2013 report by Environment America listed Thomas Hill as the 68th most-polluting power plant in the nation, with annual emissions equivalent to 1.73 million passenger vehicles. And EPA data shows that from 2009 to 2016, the plant’s nitrogen oxide emissions increased 229 percent. 

Those gathered at the plant on Thursday celebrated Pruitt, a longtime ally of the fossil fuel industry who has questioned the scientific consensus on climate change and sued the EPA more than a dozen times as attorney general of Oklahoma.

“If you would have told me a year ago we could be here today with Scott Pruitt as administrator of the EPA, I would say surely it couldn’t be that good,” Sen. Roy Blunt (R-Mo.) said as he introduced Pruitt, according to the Moberly newspaper. “We now have someone at the EPA who has fought the EPA but is willing to make a new commitment to do what the EPA is supposed to do: Look for environmental problems and solve them.”

Sen. Tom Carper (D-Del.) blasted Pruitt’s plan on Thursday, tweeting that it takes America “back to when our air was filled with toxic smoke and our water was polluted with waste.”

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Watch Woman Figure Out Movie Trailer Is Really A Marriage Proposal

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

Adrianna Neil thought she was going to see “Beauty and the Beast” with her boyfriend as an early 26th birthday present.

She didn’t realize she’d have the type of experience that is straight out of Hollywood.

Neil’s boyfriend, Ryan Langston, had planned for her to watch a wedding proposal that looked ― at first ― like a movie trailer.

The 28-year-old Langston said he has known Neil for 10 years, but they fell in love a year ago.

“We both love movies or anything that brings an emotional experience, and I wanted to propose in a way that would be memorable,” Langston told The Huffington Post. “I knew that I wanted it to be something really special for her.”

The trailer was definitely in Langston’s wheelhouse. He is a graphic animator at the corporate offices for Cinetopia theaters.

Still, trying to get the film proposal just right made for one nerve-wracking month before he finally unveiled it for her March 16 at a Cinetopia theater in their hometown of Vancouver, Washington.

“The staff was amazing at helping me pull this off,” he said. “They ran the test of the trailer several times that day during intermissions just to make sure it would run without a hitch.”

Based on this screenshot of the moment in the video where Neil realizes the movie trailer she’s watching is tailored to her alone, it’s pretty obvious she said yes. 

Langston and Neil are shooting for a wedding in September 2018, followed by a honeymoon in either Italy or Scotland.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

This Is What Happens When You Try To Get Congress High

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

WASHINGTON ― By design and tradition, the Senate moves slowly.

Or maybe it just feels slow.

That was one of many questions surrounding an event held Thursday just one block from the U.S. Senate. Local marijuana advocacy organization DCMJ was marking the unofficial cannabis holiday on April 20 ― better known as 4/20 ― by handing out free joints to members of Congress and their staffs. The event was being billed as a ― wait for it ― “Joint Session For Congress.”

The scene was a bizarre confluence of buttoned-up Washington politicos and cannabis enthusiasts. Sheepish bureaucrats in pressed khakis presented their official IDs to volunteers as DCMJ officials barked the play-by-play over a megaphone. (”Send our love to Tulsi Gabbard!” one exclaimed after a staffer for the Democratic Hawaii congresswoman received his two joints.) Curious Republican staffers kept their distance (”Y’all here to watch the weed thing?”) as volunteers in T-shirts stamped with slogans such as “DOPE NATION” and “Make America Kind Again” handled crowd control. Wonky congressional reporters shuffled about beside local potheads who inquired whether they absolutely needed to be a congressional employee to get a J. (”Guess I gotta go buy me a bag now!” exclaimed one disappointed onlooker wearing a bucket hat patterned with marijuana leaves.) One activist from Smart Approaches to Marijuana, a group that opposes cannabis legalization, handed out bags of Cheetos with anti-marijuana talking points stapled to them.

Put another way, what transpired Thursday was arguably the year’s foremost gathering of Washington navel-gazers and people who literally gaze at their navels because they’re stoned out of their minds.

The event was ostensibly being held to raise awareness of legislation in Congress that would allow the District of Columbia to regulate the sale of marijuana ― voters in 2014 passed a referendum allowing for the possession and consumption of small amounts of marijuana but did not specify how to regulate its sale. Attempts by the D.C. Council to regulate the sale of marijuana in the District have hit a roadblock in Congress, which has veto authority over the council.

“It’s the same hypocrisy that governs everything else around here,” said a staffer for the House’s chief administrative officer, who asked that his name not be published. He said he had begun smoking marijuana regularly six months ago to manage chronic pain.

“Look around, you can talk to other people and find out how common [marijuana use] is,” said Tyler, a District resident and volunteer who asked that his last name not be published. “I’m not the only one ― it’s not just white guys with long hair that smoke weed, man.”

But for all the hazy revelry on display, the event underscored a very serious matter ― one that organizers certainly wanted attendees and journalists to ponder ― can you legally hand out pot one block from the U.S. Capitol? The answer is complicated.

While federal law still prohibits marijuana consumption, a 2013 memo issued by the Obama administration effectively left enforcement and regulation up to the states, and the Trump administration has yet to reverse it. A number of local events in which cannabis seeds were handed out for free have gone off without interference from the authorities, and several delivery services have sprung up in which customers purchase a product ― such as a box of cookies or bottle of juice ― and receive a small amount of marijuana as a “gift.”  

However, the District of Columbia is entwined with the federal government in ways the 26 states that have passed laws loosening marijuana regulation ― or outright legalizing consumption ― are not. While someone may be inclined to take advantage of Washington’s consumption laws in one of its beautiful parks, many of the District’s outdoor spaces are actually managed by the Interior Department.

That jurisdictional tension was on full display Thursday, as U.S. Capitol Police arrested a number of organizers, including DCMJ’s director, Adam Eidinger. While officials allowed the event to proceed, the Capitol Police later attributed the arrests to the organizers’ intention to distribute marijuana.

“At approximately 12:18 p.m. today, United States Capitol Police (USCP) officers began arresting several individuals after witnessing them distributing marijuana in public view to passersby at First and Constitution Avenue, NE,” said the statement from USCP spokeswoman Eva Malecki. “Under federal law, it is unlawful to possess marijuana.”

In an interview with The Huffington Post, DCMJ Communications Director Nikolas R. Schiller said the location of the giveaway was chosen not just to raise awareness of their legislative agenda, but to highlight the apparent contradiction between what types of substances congressional staffers can and can’t consume.

“There’s a lot of trade organizations that have events with free alcohol,” Schiller said, “and staffers can go and have their free alcohol. It’s not a big deal.”   

Schiller added that the giveaway’s location ― on the corner of First Street Northeast and Constitution Avenue ― was the closest the group could get to the Senate without leaving D.C. territory (most federal offices in Washington sit on federal land out of the jurisdiction of the D.C. government and police).

While organizers said upward of 30 congressional staffers had come forward to claim their free weed in the first hour alone, the actual number was significantly less, owing in no small part to the numerous television cameras trained on the table organizers had set up to distribute the joints. With Congress on recess, there were no lawmakers around to take advantage of the giveaway ― though few legislators likely would have shown up even if they were in town.

That said, members of Congress and their staffs aren’t under terribly close scrutiny when it comes to drug use. As Schiller noted, members of Congress and their staffs are not subject to the drug testing statutes that keep other federal employees, including contractors who work in Congress, from consuming marijuana.

“Hill staffers that work for members of Congress are not required to submit urine tests, while the contractors like janitors are required to,” Schiller said. “After cleaning so many toilet bowls at work, someone might want their own bowl, yet they could lose their job.”

Politics hurt too much? Sign up for HuffPost Hill, a humorous evening roundup featuring scoops from HuffPost’s reporting team and juicy miscellanea from around the web.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Poll In 11 Asian Languages: Far More Asians Voted For Clinton Than Reported

The exit polls didn’t reflect the most accurate depiction of the Asian-American vote, a new report says. 

Though the 2016 election exit polls from Edison Research showed that 65 percent of Asian-American voters backed Hillary Clinton, the Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund (AALDEF) revealed in its report that the number is actually 79 percent. And South Asian support for the candidate was as high as 90 percent. 

President Donald Trump, however, had received 18 percent of the Asian vote rather than the 29 percent that exit polls had reported.  

“With overwhelming Asian American support for Democratic candidates in the 2016 elections and a rejection of the Trump agenda, it will be important to watch the growth of Asian American voter participation in the 2018 midterm elections,” Margaret Fung, executive director of AALDEF said of the results in a press release. 

Jerry Vattamala, the director of the group’s democracy program, explained to The Huffington Post that discrepancy in data boils down to sample size. The AALDEF’s pool of almost 14,000 voters is more than 14 times the size of Edison’s and serves as the largest sample size of Asian-American voters by far. 

Vattamala further explained that the AALDEF conducted their survey in English along with 11 different Asian languages, so it included more voters who have limited English proficiency. Edison Research, however, conducted its poll in only English and Spanish. 

“Our survey was able to capture substantially more voters’ preferences and was also comprised of voters that may not have responded to an English only survey,” he told HuffPost. 

Beyond showing strong Asian-American support for Clinton, the results revealed that the majority of the group voted for the Democratic candidate in most Congressional races. The report detailed that they also overwhelmingly supported stricter gun control laws. And most backed laws to protect LGBTQ people from discrimination in employment, housing, and public accommodations, as well as comprehensive immigration reform including a path to citizenship. 

Asian-Americans’ shift toward Democratic candidates has a lot to do with the way in which the group has been historically treated in the U.S., Vattamala said. The minority often supports Democratic candidates’ stances on immigration, civil rights, and inclusiveness due to discriminatory U.S. policies in the past like the Chinese Exclusion Act and the imprisonment of Japanese Americans. 

“Asian-Americans have been the targets of exclusionary rhetoric and discriminatory racist policies, resulting in a rejection of those type of proposals or candidates that adopt or otherwise support similar legislation or policies,” he said.   

The minority group’s opposition to Trump was mostly rooted in the then-presidential candidate’s “attacks” on Asian-Americans, Vattamala explained. Trump’s talk of restricting immigration ― particularly his statements about ending “the use of the H-1B as a cheap labor program” ― haven’t sat well with the South Asian and Chinese communities. And besides his jabs at China, his proposed Muslim ban and statements about Muslim registries felt reminiscent of a painful history for Asian-Americans. 

“His proposed Muslim ban and possible Muslim registries were repugnant to many Asian Americans and were unbelievably supported by Trump and his team by citing to the Japanese internment as valid legal precedent,” Vattamala said, referring to Trump surrogate Carl Higbie’s remarks in a Fox News interview. Higbie later walked back on his comments. “The Muslim ban was also reminiscent of the Chinese Exclusion Act, which was initially passed as a temporary ban.”

Asian-Americans have been shifting toward the Democratic party for more than two decades, with the party’s share of the Asian American presidential vote more than doubling, Karthick Ramakrishnan, founder of AAPIdata.com wrote in The American Prospect Magazine. In fact, Asians are now twice as likely to identify as Democrat than Republican, a 2016 survey showed. 

It’s also of note that there were significant rates of undecided voters on several important issues ― especially among naturalized citizens and older Asian-Americans with limited English proficiency. The group notes that ultimately, there’s a serious need for more educational outreach. 

“Asian-Americans can very well be the difference in close elections, and candidates would be well-served to identify and address the needs of the Asian American community,” Vattamala told HuffPost. 

 

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

15 Times Fans Of 'The Office' Pulled Off The Most Perfect Promposals

Fact: The best way to ask a fan of “The Office” to prom is to stage a jokey promposal so elaborate, even Jim Halpert would sit up and take notice.

Below, 15 times fans of “The Office” pulled off the perfect promposals

type=type=RelatedArticlesblockTitle=Related Stories + articlesList=58f15528e4b0da2ff860f1d6,563a4526e4b0307f2cab862f,58da0a2de4b00f68a5ca49a9,58e4a209e4b03a26a367893b

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

The only thing new about Nike's latest Apple Watch is the band

When the Apple Watch Series 2 debuted some beefed-up fitness tracking features last year, the Nike+ variation looked like it would finally realize the full potential of Apple and Nike’s long-running partnership. For the same price as the standard App…

Juicero CEO promises refunds for any dissatisfied customers while defending the company’s tech

 Jeff Dunn, the former Coca Cola executive who became CEO of Juicero last year, has responded to a wave of coverage suggesting that the company’s juice press isn’t all that was promised — and he’s offering dissatisfied customers their money back. A Bloomberg report showed that Juicero’s packs could be squeezed by hand, no expensive required. Dunn’s response?… Read More

'Supercard' Startup Plastc Goes Belly Up, Screwing Thousands of Backers

There are dozens of ways to pay for things, but apparently, the world was not ready for one more. Plastc, the company that promised to put all of your credit cards on one chunk of plastic, is officially dead.

Read more…

Here Are the Ways Large Asteroids Can Kill You, Ranked

Large asteroids definitely present one of the most colorful and chaotic possible apocalypses. Such an impact would cause quite a cinematic conclusion, combining a plague of wind, tsunamis, heat, and other terrors into a horrible death-fest. Honestly, count me in.

Read more…