Henry Kissinger Barely Musters Up Some Thoughts On Jared Kushner

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

One of the annual traditions over at Time magazine is the unveiling of the “Time 100,” which exists to remind everyone that the editors of the podiatrist waiting-room glossy have access to the world’s elite. Basically, they call up a bunch of famous people, ask them to write articles about another bunch of famous people, and then someone says, “Okay, that’s 100, we did it guys.” Later, there is a fancy party for all of these party-impoverished people.

Aging murder-satchel Henry Kissinger is apparently one of Time’s go-to eminences whenever there is a need for a handful of paragraphs to be written about some other toff, and this year, he’s somehow ended up drawing career nepotism hire and acting president of the United States Jared Kushner as his subject.

The resulting tribute? Well, it somehow manages to strip what scant “funk” remains in the word “perfunctory.” The phrase the internet has been using to describe this literary entanglement is “damning with faint praise,” but to be honest, it really damns Kushner with faint anything. It’s a wonder that Kissinger doesn’t begin by saying, “The Oxford English dictionary defines Jared as …”

Let’s take a trip through this brief article, which I’m almost certain was submitted via Twitter DM. Per Kissinger:

Transitioning the presidency between parties is one of the most complex undertakings in American politics. The change triggers an upheaval in the intangible mechanisms by which Washington runs: an incoming President is likely to be less familiar with formal structures, and the greater that gap, the heavier the responsibility of those advisers who are asked to fill it.

Aaaand, it is now halfway done! Did you know that presidential transitions exist? We’ve done them, more or less successfully, some 40-odd times, but maybe you didn’t notice that. Nevertheless, I suppose we are going to now hear about what makes Jared Kushner, “Time 100” honoree, uniquely gifted to handle the advisory role to which Kissinger alludes.

This space has been traversed for nearly four months by Jared Kushner, whom I first met about 18 months ago, when he introduced himself after a foreign policy lecture I had given.

Okay, so far we have Kissinger attesting to the fact that Jared Kushner is a thing that tangibly exists in space and time.

We have sporadically ­exchanged views since.

This is the only mention of an interaction between the two men. No “views” are documented or evaluated. Today, I got on an elevator and exchanged views about the nice spring weather with someone who works on the fourth floor of my building.

As part of the Trump family, Jared is familiar with the intangibles of the President. As a graduate of Harvard and NYU, he has a broad education; as a businessman, a knowledge of administration.

Jared is apparently in a relationship with his father-in-law. He learned some indeterminate things at two universities. He likely noticed that “businesses” are run through “administrations,” rather then through midnight Wiccan dances or water balloon fights. As Vox’s Zach Beauchamp observes, there are numerous reasons to doubt that Kushner has even the level of experience and attainment that Kissinger mentions in passing.

Where is this going? There is one sentence left in this piece, and it had better deliver.

All this should help him make a success of his daunting role flying close to the sun.

Ahh, yes. An Icarus reference. Very auspicious. And rather on the nose: Icarus famously fashioned wings of wax and perished when he flew too close to the sun. Additionally, Icarus’ father figure, Daedalus, was trapped within a labyrinth prison of his own making. Clever boy, this Kissinger. (Of course, the thing that sets Kushner apart from Icarus is that Jared may be entirely held together by wax.)

In case you’re wondering if Kissinger is always vague in his praise, a useful comparison can be made to his 2015 “Time 100” contribution, celebrating Elizabeth Holmes, in which Kissinger is far more florid and specific in his praise ― which may be simply due to the fact that he sat on the board of Holmes’ start-up, Theranos. Here’s Kissinger, enthusing:

Elizabeth Holmes’ is a story that could happen only in America. After her sophomore year she left Stanford to devote herself to a vision of health care available as a basic human right. When I was introduced to Elizabeth by George Shultz, her plan sounded like an undergraduate’s dream. I told her she had only two prospects: total failure or vast success. There would be no middle ground.

Well, Kissinger was certainly right about that. Holmes, too, traversed the sky in an Icarian manner. Theranos was birthed into the world and backed by a mountain of Silicon Valley funder ducats with the goal of revolutionizing blood-extraction technology. But in October 2016, The Wall Street Journal reported that the company was not close to delivering on the promises it had made, and Holmes was dogged by further controversy after subsequent reports demonstrated that Theranos was a dangerous, serial violator of lab standards and government regulations.

This might indicate that receiving a tribute from Kissinger in the “Time 100” may be the kiss of death. Nevertheless, the silver lining here is that if Kissinger’s profile of Kushner demonstrates anything, it’s that in the end, someone affiliated with Theranos proved themselves capable of draining the blood from something after all.

~~~~~

Jason Linkins edits “Eat The Press” for The Huffington Post and co-hosts the HuffPost Politics podcast “So, That Happened.” Subscribe here, and listen to the latest episode below.  

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_2’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

These 3 Women Created An App For All Your Emergency Shape-Up Needs

Balancing school, work and being black can make it difficult to prioritize looking good. But three Howard alumnae and friends are making the efforts involved with being busy, black and well-kempt much simpler with an app providing on-demand barber service to your doorstep. 

The HausCall app provides on-demand barber services to users’ doorsteps. Created by Morgan Winbush, Killian Lewis and Crystal Allen-Washington, the app offers users the ability to book an immediate appointment with a barber of their choosing or schedule one in advance. 

“It’s homecoming at Howard. Every guy we know is trying to feel and look like Diddy,” Winbush, the Chief Marketing Officer told Vibe. “If you’re running or coming into town really late, and you had to go to #1000Bottles or whatever party is happening on Friday night, but you didn’t have enough time [to spare], you could use HausCall and a barber would come wherever you are to cut your hair and make sure you looked great.”

A soft launch of the app will take place in New York and Washington D.C. this June. If all goes well, it’ll be launching in Atlanta next fall. 

So not only will these three women be taking home the profits from HausCall, but they also plan on hiring and servicing people of color. It’s brilliant. It’s bougie. The group even told Blavity they also have intend to employ those who were formerly incarcerated and are struggling to find jobs. 

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Trump Contradicts State Department On Iran Deal

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

WASHINGTON ― President Donald Trump said Thursday that Iran hasn’t abided by the “spirit” of an international deal to curtail its nuclear program.

“Iran has not lived up to the spirit of the agreement,” Trump said at the White House during a joint press conference with the Italian prime minister.

Trump called the Iran deal terrible during his campaign for president last year, but his comment Thursday seemed to contradict what his own State Department said earlier in the week.

“The U.S. Department of State certified to U.S. House Speaker Paul Ryan today that Iran is compliant through April 18th with its commitments under the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action,” the department said on Tuesday, in the first compliance update to Congress under the terms of the deal. 

The State Department also said that “Iran remains a leading state sponsor of terror through many platforms and methods” and that the Trump administration is reviewing the deal. 

“I think they are doing a tremendous disservice to an agreement that was signed and it was a terrible agreement,” Trump said Thursday. “We are analyzing it very carefully and we’ll have something to say about it in the not too distant future.”

Under the deal, struck between Iran, China, France, Russia, the U.K. and the U.S., Iran is allowed to advance its nuclear program, but only for peaceful purposes, in exchange for relief from economic sanctions. 

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Christian Women On Twitter Unload About Misogyny In The Church

A Twitter hashtag about Christian women has revealed some ugly truths about misogyny in the church.

Christian author Sarah Bessey started the thread Tuesday night with the tag #ThingsOnlyChristianWomenHear to highlight issues surrounding male privilege in many Christian communities. The conversation, which she said she initiated “on a whim,” quickly amassed hundreds of tweets from women sharing some of the dehumanizing things they’ve heard from others in their Christian communities. 

“This hashtag is pulling back the curtain on the everyday lived experiences of women within the Church,” Bessey wrote in a Facebook post Wednesday morning.

Bessey acknowledged she couldn’t vouch that every single tweet reflected things the women have actually heard, verbatim. But she noted, “For my own contributions: each statement was said to me, about me, in front of me.”

As several of the users noted, misogyny is by no means a Christian problem nor a religious one, alone. And the thread didn’t delve extensively into issues of race, class, sexual orientation or other important factors that create imbalances both within Christian communities and in society at large.

But the responses highlighted the high degree of white, male, and Christian privilege that exists in all areas of American society, and which also affect Christian women across the spectrum of backgrounds. 

Many of the tweets centered around issues of love, sex and marriage:

Several tweets referred to “The Billy Graham Rule,” which was recently in the news after a 2002 interview with Vice President Mike Pence resurfaced. Pence reportedly told The Hill that “he never eats alone with a woman other than his wife and that he won’t attend events featuring alcohol without her by his side.” 

The no-eating-with-another-woman rule was made popular by evangelical pastor Billy Graham in 1948 and plays into the notion that men have uncontrollable sexual urges that women are ultimately responsible for.

Many women also expressed frustration with the double standard they feel they face when it comes to school, work and leadership:

A number of men also chimed in to offer their support:

Women who speak up on social media about controversial topics often face backlash, and the #ThingsOnlyChristianWomenHear thread was no exception. Several trolls claimed the women were being bad Christians by supposedly stoking anti-church sentiment. Others mocked the women for being religious at all.

One user’s criticism of the thread prompted responses from several of the women:

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Reminder To Progressives: Abortion Is An Economic Issue

Bernie Sanders traveled to Nebraska this week to throw his support behind Omaha Democratic mayoral candidate, Heath Mello, who is running against the incumbent Republican mayor, Jean Stothert. A Mello win, Sanders has said, would give hope to other “progressive Democrats” in conservative states.

But Mello’s “progressive” credentials are questionable at best. As a state senator, he co-sponsored a bill mandating that women have an ultrasound before they can have an abortion, saying it represented a “positive first step to reducing the number of abortions in Nebraska.”

As a populist, Sanders has built a political career protesting economic inequality— and yet by campaigning for Mello, he has demonstrated a willingness to separate economic justice from reproductive justice. (So has Democratic National Committee Chair, Tom Perez, who is also helping to campaign for Mello and who has defended that decision, saying the job of the DNC is to help Democratic candidates win.) But abortion access is not just a medical issue, or even a social one; it is, at its core, an economic concern. Here’s why.

Unintended pregnancies place an enormous financial burden on women.

Raising children in the United States is expensive. Like, more than $230,000 per child (from birth to age 17) expensive. That includes food, transportation, housing, education (but not college), health care and child care. Oh, and daycare for babies is now more expensive than college tuition in most states. 

Women in this country already face a well-documented motherhood financial penalty. Research shows, for example, that mothers are less likely to be hired for jobs and they are offered lower starting salaries when they are hired. (Men don’t appear to be similarly disadvantaged by becoming dads, and might actually benefit from it, career-wise.)

“Having a baby is the most expensive health event that families face during their childbearing years. At the same time, a lack of workplace supports for many women during this critical time means a woman may not have paid sick days for prenatal appointments or well-baby care, or paid family and medical leave to use after giving birth. Addressing all of these issues is central to achieving economic justice for women and families,” said Sarah Lipton-Lubet, vice president of the National Partnership for Women & Families. 

Roughly 60 percent of women who have abortions are already mothers, which means they understand these factors not in some abstract way, but both deeply and personally. In fact, economic concerns are a major reason why women chose to end pregnancies. Estimates suggest that between 40 and 75 percent of women seeking abortions do so simply because they cannot afford to have a baby.

“The most common reason women give for wanting to terminate a pregnancy is that they feel that they cannot afford to have a baby or to have another baby,” Diana Greene Foster, director of research with the University of California San Francisco’s Advancing New Standards In Reproductive Health (ANSIRH) told The Huffington Post.

Low-income women are hit the hardest by unplanned pregnancies — and by policies that limit abortion access.

In the United States, roughly 5 percent of reproductive-age women have an unintended pregnancy each year, and those pregnancies disproportionately occur among low-income and poor women. In 2011, the unintended pregnancy rate among women living well below the federal poverty level —around $18,000 for a family of three — was five times higher than women living well above the federal poverty line. 

Low-income women also struggle to afford abortion, particularly because the Hyde Amendment has long restricted Medicaid coverage for abortion care. Research shows that in order to come up with the money necessary for the procedure, women are forced to forgo food for themselves and their children, to miss rent payments and to sell off personal items.

“When women are unable to get an abortion, they are more likely to be poor, less likely to work full time and more likely to receive public assistance,” Foster said. “And this has important consequences for their existing children and their ability to care for a new child.”

Also, because two-thirds of the unplanned births in this country are paid for by public insurance programs, namely Medicaid, according to the Guttmacher Institute, the reproductive health policy and advocacy group, unintended pregnancies weigh on the economy as well .

That means that any line separating reproductive rights from economic concerns is an imaginary one. Abortion is an economic justice issue, as is a woman’s ability to access broader family planning services. True progressives would do well to remember that.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Betsy DeVos Visits Public School, Insists School Choice Can Work In Rural Areas

U.S. Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos and labor leader Randi Weingarten put aside their differences Thursday to visit a public school district in Van Wert, Ohio. Both leaders praised the district, although DeVos did not back down from the idea that expanded school choice options could benefit the area.

“I acknowledge and have acknowledged for many months, rural areas face unique challenges and unique opportunities,” DeVos said Thursday, in response to a question about whether school choice would work in an area like rural Ohio. “I think the fear of a negative impact on a school that is meeting the needs of its students is very low, actually.”

DeVos said it was evident there was a vibrant learning environment in Van Wert classrooms, but she argued that parents in the area might still appreciate the benefits of school choice. 

“[In Van Wert], it might be a handful of students who might elect to do something different if they had that opportunity. Perhaps that would be the case. But that would be a choice made by parents,” DeVos said, noting that 20 percent of students in the area already choose to go to schools that are not part of the Van Wert district.

Weingarten invited DeVos to visit a public school with her several months ago, shortly after DeVos’ contentious confirmation process. Van Wert is located in a rural area where most students qualify for free or reduced-price lunch, and where most residents voted for President Donald Trump.

Weingarten and DeVos have been deeply critical of one another in the past, but they expressed a mutual appreciation during the Van Wert visit. Weingarten, president of the nation’s second largest teachers union, cited the visit as evidence of DeVos’ willingness to “walk the walk.”

“I don’t think we even gave her a duty-free lunch,” Weingarten joked during the press conference. 

DeVos faced a particularly harsh confirmation process, where a 50-50 vote forced Vice President Mike Pence to break the tie. During this time, Weingarten and her union, the American Federation of Teachers, portrayed DeVos as an interloper bent on destroying traditional public education in order to create a more capitalistic, free-market structure.

DeVos maintains that she supports traditional public schools, but also believes parents should be given a menu of options for where they can send their students. At the same time, the proposed U.S. Department of Education budget would make steep cuts to public school programs, while setting aside money for charter schools and a still-nebulous private school choice program.

Part of her goal, DeVos said during the press conference, is to diminish federal and top-down intervention in education to give teachers and schools increased autonomy. 

“We overcomplicate things in many cases and for no specific end necessarily,” she said. 

DeVos has not had as much communication with the nation’s other major teachers union, the National Education Association. DeVos reportedly called the president of the NEA, Lily Eskelsen García, who sent DeVos a letter in response. The letter demanded clarity from DeVos on issues like special education and LGBTQ students.

“Students, parents and educators still want answers for a wealth of concerns based on Secretary DeVos’s destructive record and refusal to commit to ensuring every child in every community has the opportunity provided by a great education at a neighborhood public school,” García said in a statement to The Huffington Post. “NEA raised a number of these issues in my February 14 letter to the secretary and we have not received a response.”

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Concentrates are the future of cannabis

The cannabis industry is in the midst of an unprecedented renaissance. Strains are stronger, consumption methods more numerous and availability greater than ever before. Medical-grade marijuana now averages around 20 percent THC — a threefold increa…

The Wirecutter's best deals: Grenco Science's G Pen Elite drops to $120

This post was done in partnership with The Wirecutter, a buyer’s guide to the best technology. When readers choose to buy The Wirecutter’s independently chosen editorial picks, they may earn affiliate commissions that support their work. Read their c…

Tot Bot helps physically disabled toddlers explore

As any parent of a small child knows, toddlers want to explore. They want to look and touch (and sometimes even taste) everything. It’s how they learn about the world. Unfortunately, kids with certain physical disabilities can’t move about as easily….

What It Would Really Take To Sink A Modern Aircraft Carrier

The modern aircraft carrier is a global symbol of American dominance, hegemony, peace, even empire. But at over 1,000 feet long, and displacing more than 100,000 tons, is it a sitting duck? Is the massive emblem of American greatness just an obsolete, vulnerable hunk of steel?

Read more…