These Are The 10 Best U.S. Cities For Millennials

For millennials on the move, figuring out where to put down roots is always a tough choice. And as many a think piece has pointed out, millennials want it all ― a fulfilling job, nice house, great beer scene ― you name it. 

Luckily, our friends over at Nestpick, a Berlin-based company that aggregates listings of furnished apartments, recently put together a list of the 100 best cities for millennials. The company looked at cities all around the globe and ranked them based on sixteen factors, such as employment, transportation and housing, as well as LGBTQ-friendliness and gender equality. 

The United States nabbed 10 spots on the list of 100 global hubs (though none of them ranked about #41). Austin, one of the fastest-growing cities in the U.S., ranked highest on the index, while San Francisco was right behind for its startup culture and LGBTQ-friendly environment. 

Find out where your favorite city ranks in the list below: 

41. Austin, Texas

45. San Francisco, California

50. Denver, Colorado

52. Portland, Oregon

58. Seattle, Washington 

60. Los Angeles, California 

64. New York City, New York 

67. Chicago, Illinois  

68. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania  

79. Boston, Massachusetts 

Head here to check out Nestpick’s list in its entirety. 

The HuffPost Lifestyle newsletter will make you happier and healthier, one email at a time. Sign up here.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Poll: Trump’s First-Quarter Ratings Lowest For A President Since WWII

President Donald Trump received substantially worse ratings for his first months in office than any president dating back to World War II, according to Gallup.

Even presidents who’ve gone on to be unpopular generally enjoyed high ratings during their first months in office. But Trump’s average rating since Inauguration Day is just 41 percent, according to Gallup, making him the only president in their polling history to fall short of majority approval during his first quarter.

Former President Bill Clinton, the next-lowest ranked, had an average approval rating of 55 percent for that time period, while former Presidents Barack Obama and George W. Bush enjoyed first quarter ratings of 63 percent and 58 percent, respectively. 

What sets Trump apart isn’t a lack of support from his own party. About 87 percent of Republicans approve of his performance, several points above the average for previous presidents and similar to the numbers Obama and Bush saw at this point in their presidencies.

Rather, Trump’s ratings reflect the near-complete absence of support from Democrats, just 9 percent of whom approve of his performance so far.

Americans’ willingness to support a president across the aisle has shrunk dramatically in recent years. This early in their terms, former Presidents Dwight Eisenhower, John F. Kennedy, Richard Nixon and Jimmy Carter all saw majority support from their opposing party, a feat that seems almost unimaginable in the modern political environment. But Obama still managed to garner the approval of about 30 percent of Republicans during the first quarter of 2009, while Bush saw a 32 percent rating among Democrats in the first quarter of 2001.

Trump’s numbers are also notably weak among independents. Just 37 percent approve of his performance, according to Gallup, compared with 51 percent or more for every other president since Eisenhower.

Trump’s “unconventional style suggested his presidency would be like nothing seen before,” Gallup’s Jeffrey M. Jones wrote. “And that has been true, but likely not in the way he or his supporters hoped ― with no honeymoon period to speak of and approval ratings far worse than any president has received this early in his tenure. On his best day, less than half of Americans, 46%, have approved of the job Trump is doing.”

Gallup is just one of the pollsters tracking Trump’s approval rating, and its numbers so far have looked slightly less positive than average. 

But it’s not far off. As of Thursday morning, HuffPost Pollster’s aggregate, which combines publicly available polling, gives Trump about a 43 percent approval rating, with just under 51 percent disapproving. By contrast, in April 2009, Obama’s average rating, though quickly declining from his post-inauguration honeymoon numbers, still stood at just under 60 percent.

Gallup surveyed 45,111 adults between Jan. 20 and April 19, using live interviewers to reach both landlines and cellphones.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Sorry, No Self-Respecting Mermaid Would Ever Eat 'Mermaid Toast'

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

There’s no denying it anymore — people who are ostensibly adults are completely over the moon for unnaturally colored and/or sparkly food named after mythical beings.

If this wasn’t already apparent before, the booming popularity of Starbucks’ suspiciously bright “unicorn frappuccino” — which is reportedly a huge pain for baristas to make and doesn’t even taste that great — should seal the deal.

But it may be time for unicorns to hoof it to the sidelines, as there’s a new fairy tale-based food item in town — so-called “mermaid toast.” Mermaid toast features brightly dyed spreads and sparkly garnishes like gold leaf, and it’s having a real mer-ment. The snack can also be called “unicorn toast,” but what seems to set mermaid toast apart is blue-green shades and a vaguely aquatic/ocean theme.

This week, Vogue dubbed it “Instagram’s most magical food trend” and credited food stylist Adeline Waugh as being behind the fashionable snack.

Look, mermaid toast is obviously very pretty. And since it’s just regular toast with the spreads (Waugh uses almond-milk cream cheese) dyed different colors, we’re sure it tastes great. But there’s one big problem with mermaid toast: its name.

The fact is, no self-respecting mermaid would ever eat mermaid toast.

It’s true. And in case this revelation is difficult to take in right now, we’ve outlined the main reasons why to make it easier for you.

1. Toast sucks underwater.

Go ahead. Make a delicious piece of toast and go dip it in a cup of water or something. Then let us know if you still want to eat it. Regular, untoasted bread is bad enough when soggy, but water completely negates the main point — crispiness — of toast.

Anyone else notice the unicorn in the @threadbangerstudios #mermaidtoast video?? #mermaid #food

A post shared by Kaelin Nichole Lovins (@kaelin__nichole) on Apr 19, 2017 at 9:11am PDT

And don’t make some excuse about mermaids eating the toast while popping up out of the water — it’s just not practical to do it that way without it getting wet. Why would a mermaid even go to the trouble of toasting anything under those circumstances? They wouldn’t, and it’s a good thing, because …

2. Using a toaster in or around water is very dangerous

We all know this, right? There have to be about seven dozen movies where someone is killed by throwing a toaster into a bathtub. We can safely presume using one of these appliances underwater is a bad, bad, bad idea. Even if the mermaids were able to hoist the toaster (and a working outlet??) out of the water, the whole thing seems too damn risky.

3. Mermaids are very environmentally conscious.

Work with us on this one. Mermaids clearly care deeply about the aquatic critters with whom they share their underwater homes. In The Little Mermaid, for instance, King Triton denounces humans as horrible “fish eaters.”

And bread in the water could be bad for those critters. As we’ve already established, bread or toast eaten underwater would become soggy and inevitably break apart and float away, beyond the mermaids’ control. Why is this a bad thing?

Well, although plenty of well-meaning people feed bread to aquatic wild animals, it’s generally not a good idea. Feeding ducks, for instance, may seem like an idyllic pastime, but experts have been trying to get the message across for years that bread is actually really bad for ducks to eat. Since it has little nutritional value for them, it fills the birds up and prevents them from eating the food they actually need, which can lead to serious illness. Plus, excess crumbs in the water can encourage bacterial growth and can seriously screw with water quality.

Bread is also known to be bad news for seagulls, turtles, manatees, and fish. Obviously, no mermaid could bear the thought of potentially harming their animal friends.

If all this hasn’t convinced you that mermaid toast just isn’t authentic, probably nothing will. We’re not saying you shouldn’t eat it, just keep in mind that you’re not really a mermaid while doing it.

Oh, and while you’re at it, don’t feed a unicorn frappucino to an actual unicorn. If their digestive systems are anything a horse’s, it could give them diarrhea.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

6 Protesters Were Arrested. Only The 2 Arab Muslims Face Misdemeanor Charges.

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

WASHINGTON ― In February, U.S. Capitol Police arrested six people for protesting during a confirmation hearing for the U.S. ambassador to Israel. But only two of the protesters, both Muslim men of Arab descent, face misdemeanor charges. The other four protesters, who are all Jewish, were allowed to pay a small fine or resolve the matter in traffic court.

Taher Herzallah and Kareem El-Hosseiny, the two Muslim men, were charged with misdemeanor unlawful conduct in Congress and now face a maximum penalty of $500 and up to six months in jail.

Herzallah and El-Hosseiny’s lawyer, Ann Wilcox, plans to file a motion to dismiss the case on the grounds that it is based on racial, religious and ethnic bias, she said after a court hearing Thursday.

“For similar conduct, they should have been treated the same [as the other protesters],” said Wilcox, a member of the National Lawyers Guild.

Herzallah, El-Hosseiny, and the four other demonstrators were arrested on Feb. 16 after they interrupted David Friedman’s confirmation hearing and urged lawmakers not to confirm the nominee. Friedman has supported settlements in the West Bank, spoken critically of the two-state solution, and compared liberal Jewish organizations to Jews who aided the Nazis during the Holocaust.

The six protesters behaved nearly identically. Each of them stood and spoke for about 30 seconds before security escorted them out of the room. Herzallah and El-Hosseiny, who are affiliated with the group American Muslims for Palestine, held up Palestinian flags as they spoke. Isaac Flegel-Mishlove, of the Jewish anti-occupation group IfNotNow, blew a shofar, a musical instrument used in Jewish religious ceremonies. His colleagues sang “We will build this world with love” as they were escorted out of the room. Tali Ruskin, of the anti-war group CodePink, wore a smock with “Stop settlements” written across the front.

But the protesters received widely disparate punishments for their actions. Two paid a $50 fine the same day they were arrested. Another paid $35. Capitol police told Herzallah, El-Hosseiny, and Thomas Corcoran of IfNotNow that they were required to appear in court. A week later, Corcoran’s case was moved to traffic court. But Herzallah and El-Hosseiny were charged with misdemeanors.

Herzallah and El-Hosseiny first appeared in court on March 1. They considered accepting a plea deal that would have banned them from Capitol grounds for four months and obligated them to do 32 hours of community service. However, they decided to reject the plea deal to fight what they believe is discriminatory treatment.

The six protesters kept in touch after their arrests and tried to figure out why they received different punishments for committing the same acts in the same place on the same day. They rewatched video footage from the confirmation hearing, looking for signs that any of them had been especially disruptive compared to the others. They say they don’t see a reason why Herzallah and El-Hosseiny were singled out for harsher treatment.

At first, the group wasn’t sure if the discrepancy in their punishments was the result of incompetence or prejudice. It took the officers nearly six hours to process the protesters after they were arrested. Over the course of the day, the officers appeared to change their minds several times about whether to fine the protesters or send them to court. One officer even asked El-Hosseiny if he had cash to pay a fine, he told The Huffington Post.

“They were arguing among themselves about what should happen with us,” Herzallah said. “It seemed like the officers were either untrained or it was their first time dealing with this.”

Capitol police did not respond to a request for comment.

When’s Corcoran’s case was moved to traffic court, the group began to believe that Herzallah and El-Hosseiny’s religion or ethnicity had factored into their punishment.

“That to me is the most blatant example of racism and Islamophobic practices,” said Lila Weintraub, who was arrested after demonstrating with IfNotNow and was fined $50 for her actions. “I can’t really see any other reason why they wouldn’t have all gotten the same charge.”

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Billy Bush's Creepy Instagram Video Shows He Desperately Wants To Be Back On TV

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

Billy Bush apparently will do anything to get back on TV ― even humiliate himself with an Instagram video that can only be described as “creepy.”

The video posted on Wednesday shows the former “Access Hollywood” and “Today Show” personality getting a haircut while singing an odd ode to himself that seems to be a rewrite of “Look At Me, I’m Sandra Dee” from “Grease.”

Look at me, I’m Billy B. / Trying to get back on TV / My hair is long and flat / And makes me look fat / And I can’t be — I’m Billy B.

Mere words don’t do it justice.

 

Time for a haircut with my beloved @tommy_cyr.

A post shared by William Bush (@billybush) on Apr 18, 2017 at 3:01pm PDT

Bush was canned from “The Today Show” back in October after a 2005 hot-mic recording showed him engaging in a vulgar conversation with then-GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump.

The recording is infamous for Trump’s comments that a star can do anything with a woman even “grab them by the pussy.”

A day after the recording became public, Bush apologized, saying he was “embarrassed and ashamed,” and added, “I was younger, less mature, and acted foolishly in playing along. I’m very sorry.”

It should be noted that while Bush lost his $3.5 million a year job because of the recording, Trump was elected president a couple of weeks later.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

16 Fierce Wedding Jumpsuits For Brides Who Don't Do Dresses

Some girls grow up dreaming of their fairytale wedding ball gown, while others would much rather spend the big day in a pair of pants. 

For brides who fall into the second category, we’ve gathered 16 on-trend wedding jumpsuits that will have you jumping for joy. 

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Ellen DeGeneres Gives Classic Children’s Books Hilarious 420 Makeovers

A dope clip was posted to Ellen DeGeneres’ Twitter account on Thursday. In it, DeGeneres casually asked, “Hey do you know what today is? It’s 420.”

Her studio audience immediately responded with a loud round of applause.

“I can’t believe how many of you know what that is,” she said.

The daytime talk show host then went on to explain that 420 is code for smoking weed.

Most people aren’t quite sure why 420 is synonymous with smoking weed, but marijuana smokers around the world have embraced the term. Every year, people celebrate by indulging in some herbal goodness on April 20.

DeGeneres then went on to talk about a book called “Scratch and Sniff Book of Weed.” She explained that people are “very upset” by the book because it looks like it’s marketed to children.

And with that, DeGeneres came up with marijuana versions of a few popular children’s books — and let’s just say, they’re pretty fire.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Guy's Date With An Olive Garden Manager Unearths Deep, Dark Secrets

A San Francisco-based writer blessed the interwebs Wednesday with the apparent answer to a question as old as Olive Garden’s most famous slogan: What exactly would a customer have to do to no longer be considered “family?” 

Joe Wadlington wrote on Twitter that he went on a date Tuesday night and discovered his prospective love interest is a former general manager for the chain. But not just any Olive Garden ― his date was the general manager of the Times Square Olive Garden. You know, the one that’s three floors high, charges $400 a head for its New Year’s Eve bash, and leaves everyone wondering why tourists visiting New York are eating at an Olive Garden?

Wadlington reacted as any human with a pulse would have: He said he launched into a full-blown interrogation about the restaurant’s innermost workings and, of course, the infamous unlimited salad and breadsticks. 

He related what his date declared the Garden’s worst-case scenario: The horror of running out of unlimited breadsticks is far more upsetting than anything else that can possibly happen at the restaurant.  

Consider the story Wadlington says his date shared about a knife fight between two women in the restaurant.

“You may be surprised, but yes, Olive Garden running out of breadsticks is worse than a knife fight,” the date reported. 

The extensive thread also answers many questions we’ve had about Olive Garden. Diners at the Times Square location pay higher prices that those at other locations; the restaurant continues seating until 2 a.m. and hosts mainly Brazilians, Puerto Ricans, and Americans from Ohio; and, most importantly, you can’t get kicked out for sitting and eating only as much unlimited salad and breadsticks as you can physically handle. 

The Olive Garden did not respond to requests for comment. Wadlington declined to give the name of his date, saying that he’d already been a pretty good sport about the tweets. But he assured The Huffington Post the conversation really happened, though he notes it’s possible his date exaggerated. (Eater reports wait times aren’t as long these days as the two-hour delay Wadlington’s date described.) 

Either way, we wish Wadlington and his date a lifetime filled with happiness and pasta passes

“We will be going on another date,” Wadlington told HuffPost. 

type=type=RelatedArticlesblockTitle=Related… + articlesList=56814e5be4b0b958f659da27,57d72147e4b09d7a687f3cfb,57978823e4b01180b5304ca4

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Parents Are Loving This Mom's Viral Diaper Bag Hack

A California mom is going viral for the creative diaper bag hack she shared on Facebook.

On April 10, Elizabeth Rasco posted photos of a Huggies baby wipes box on the Facebook page for her face and mural painting business, The Painted Dragon.  

In the caption, she wrote, “So I have to share this really cool diaper bag hack I accidentally discovered. I know its not face painting related, but I’m pretty sure I have a few moms following that could use this. I also dropped a roll of doggie bags in the bottom for dirty diaper and clothes.”

Indeed, the photos show Rasco used a thin elastic headband to attach a pack of wipes to the top of the dispenser box and thus free up space to put a backup baby outfit, plastic bags, diapers and more. 

Rasco’s post received over 17,000 likes and was shared over 109,000 times.

Following the viral spread of the post, she followed up with a more detailed explanation and updated version of her hack.

“Poked eight strategically placed holes, strung them with embroidery floss, and tied the headband to the inside,” she wrote. “Then dotted the knots with super glue so they would hold for longer. Then if the rubber band breaks or gets too old, it can be easily replaced with a new one. I also put a roll of doggie bags in there for disposal and keeping the soiled clothes in.”

Rasco’s hack clearly appealed to parents tired of digging through cluttered diaper bags to find every little thing. Many wrote in the comments section that they’ve devised similar systems for their bags and others thanked the mom for sharing the idea. 

“This would be great to keep in the car,” commented one parent. “This is brilliant!” added another.

Parenting hacks for the win!

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Future Moto Mods could offer sticky notes and improved audio

In its continuing bid to stay relevant in a competitive market, Motorola is trying to build up a community of hardware designers for the Moto Z’s modular add-ons. Yesterday, the company brought together several winners of regional hackathons to a pit…