Lenovo’s VR Headset Will Launch In Time For Back-To-School

Earlier this year at CES 2017, Lenovo took the wraps off the prototype of their VR headset that would work with Microsoft’s Holographic platform. However the question that Lenovo was unable to answer back then was when the headset would be available. The company suggested that it would be launched in 2017, but no dates were given.

However according to a report from Twice (via Mobile Syrup), it has been confirmed that the company’s VR headset would be launched in time for back-to-school. This is based on an interview with Lenovo’s VP of Consumer Business in North America, Mike Abary, where we finally got our timeframe for the headset’s launch. However once again no specifics were mentioned, but it does narrow the launch a bit, which is roughly mid-July to mid-September.

It is unclear as to what Lenovo plans on naming the headset, but according to the company who unveiled the headset earlier this year, they are aiming to keep it relatively affordable, more so than competing headsets like the Oculus Rift. Pricing has yet to be determined but it was suggested that it could be between $300-400, but the company did suggest that it might be closer to the $300 mark. In any case we guess we’ll just have to wait and see so check back with us in the coming weeks/months for the details.

Lenovo’s VR Headset Will Launch In Time For Back-To-School , original content from Ubergizmo. Read our Copyrights and terms of use.

Google Voice Gets Improved Spam Call Filtering

Just like how most of us hate junk mail, junk text messages, spam calls are just as annoying because unlike emails or text messages that can be deleted easily, spam calls require you to answer the phone first before realizing that you’ve been duped. Now there are various services out there that protects against such calls, and Google Voice is one of them.

In a post on the Google Voice Help Forum, “To better protect you from unwanted calls, we’ve recently improved our spam filter for Google Voice. Using the same technology that powers spam protection in Pixel, Nexus, and Android One devices, we now catch 2x more spammers, receive 20% fewer spam reports from users, and identify 40% more calls correctly as spam than ever before.”

It should be noted that last year Google’s Phone app had a feature where it warned users that the call they are about to answer could be from a spam caller, so we guess this feature has now been extended to Google Voice, so now Google Voice users will be able to enjoy the same level of protection.

Like we said there are various services offered that protect users on a carrier level. For example last year AT&T launched a service that would protect customers from spam calls, but we guess having more filters to catch these calls is always welcome.

Google Voice Gets Improved Spam Call Filtering , original content from Ubergizmo. Read our Copyrights and terms of use.

Facebook Appears To Be Testing Picture-In-Picture Video

With apps like YouTube, users can watch a video while browsing other videos at the same time, thanks to the picture-in-picture feature that was actually introduced quite a while back. However the same was never offered with Facebook’s videos which typically popped up in a player of its own, meaning you either had to watch the video or close it to scroll through your feed.

That could soon be changing because it has been noticed that Facebook could be testing a picture-in-picture video feature. This is according to a report from Android Police who was notified of the experiment by one of their reads, Kapil Faujdar. As you can see in the screenshots above, users can move the video to the corners of the Facebook app, meaning that they can watch the video and browse their feed at the same time.

This is similar to the desktop version of Facebook where if you were to play a video and scroll down, the video would pop out and floating on top of your browser while you browsed the rest of Facebook. Now Facebook does conduct experiments and tests like these from time to time with regards to new features, so if you don’t have the feature on your app, that’s normal. As to whether or not Facebook will actually implement this feature remains to be seen.

Facebook Appears To Be Testing Picture-In-Picture Video , original content from Ubergizmo. Read our Copyrights and terms of use.

Samsung’s Bixby Voice Will Launch In Canada This Spring

One of the touted features of the Samsung Galaxy S8 is its Bixby assistant feature. However it seems that for some reason, Samsung has chosen not to launch Bixby Voice with the handset. Instead Bixby will still be released with the Galaxy S8 but the Voice feature will not be part of it which is kind of a pity.

Unfortunately Samsung did not mention when the feature would be launched, but according to a report from Mobile Syrup, we might finally have a time frame to look forward to. The report quotes Samsung Canada who revealed that Bixby Voice would be launching “later this Spring”, although whether or not it will be only for Canada or for the rest of the world is unclear.

According to Samsung Canada, “We are very excited to be launching Bixby, the intelligent interface that will help Canadians get more out of their phone. Key features of Bixby, including Vision, Home and Reminder, will be available with the global launch of the Samsung Galaxy S8. We will be rolling out additional features and expanding its capabilities, including Bixby Voice, later this Spring.”

Like we said it is unclear if the spring launch will apply to the markets that the Galaxy S8 will be available in, or just Canada, but it wouldn’t be a stretch to think that it could be launched simultaneously. Either way we’ll be keeping an eye out for its release. In the meantime Samsung has also confirmed that support for additional languages will be arriving later this year.

Samsung’s Bixby Voice Will Launch In Canada This Spring , original content from Ubergizmo. Read our Copyrights and terms of use.

iFixit Galaxy S8 Teardown Gives It A 4/10 For Repairability

Image credit – iFixit

If you buy phones and you’re in it for the long haul, like 2-3 years, then things like how easy is the phone to repair is an important question. After all if a phone is difficult or almost impossible to repair, then either you’ll have to be very careful with it, or resort to changing to a new phone. So what about the Samsung Galaxy S8?

For those who are curious, the folks at iFixit have done their customary teardown of the handset and according to their findings, they have given the phone a 4 out of 10 in terms of repairability. While it does seem like it would be hard to repair, it is not impossible. It is also a slight step up from last year’s Galaxy S7 which scored a 3 out of 10, and it also brings it back on pair with the Galaxy S6 which also got a score of 4 out of 10.

According to iFixit, the only positive thing about the phone’s hardware and components is that most of it seems to be modular, so you can replace them independently as opposed to having to replace an entire group. However they note that things like tough adhesive especially in the battery area and a glued on rear panel makes it quite difficult to replace certain parts of the phone.

They also point out that the use of the curved screen on the front means that replacing the front glass without destroying the display is “extremely difficult”. Once again this isn’t completely impossible to repair, but it’s just something to note if you do plan on keeping the phone with you for the next couple of years.

iFixit Galaxy S8 Teardown Gives It A 4/10 For Repairability , original content from Ubergizmo. Read our Copyrights and terms of use.

Panasonic Lumix DC-ZS70 is a compact 20MP camera with 30x optical zoom

Panasonic has launched a new camera in its Travel Zoom ZS Series lineup: the Lumix DC-ZS70. Despite its compact size, this camera packs a bunch of features into its small body, including a 20.3-megapixel sensor and a large 30x optical zoom rate, the equivalent of 24-720mm. The camera is targeted at prosumers, those who are willing to spend more than … Continue reading

Panasonic unveils Leica DG Vario-Elmarit 8-18mm F2.8-4.0 ASPH lens

Joining its newly unveiled Lumix camera is a new lens from Panasonic, its Leica-branded DG Vario-Elmarit 8-18mm F2.8-4.0 ASPH. This lens offers a 16-36mm 35mm camera equivalent, and is the newest model in Panasonic’s Leica DG Vario-Elmarit F2.8-4.0 Series. The company says its latest lens is a great option for both video and photos, offering a focusing distance range that … Continue reading

Neil Gorsuch Could Cast Decisive Vote In Biggest Church-State Case In Decades

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

On his first day on the Supreme Court bench, Justice Neil Gorsuch seemed eager to make a good impression with his colleagues and the public, even if the cases themselves weren’t exactly headline-grabbing.

All eyes will once again be on the court’s newest member Wednesday, as he and his colleagues wrap their brains around what’s arguably the most explosive church-state case the justices have heard in decades. And where Gorsuch could, conceivably, cast the tie-breaking vote.

The case’s timing underscores Gorsuch’s importance in the matter: Trinity Lutheran Church v. Comer, as this Missouri case is known, has been lying dormant on the court’s docket since before the death of Justice Antonin Scalia. 

In January 2016, less than a month before Scalia’s passing, the Supreme Court agreed to consider the dispute — a constitutional challenge to Missouri’s decision to deny funding to a church that had applied for a state grant to resurface its school’s playground with tire scraps. In response, Trinity Lutheran sued the state in federal court, claiming that its Department of Natural Resources discriminated against and violated the church’s right to freely exercise its religion under the U.S. Constitution.

“Excluding Trinity Lutheran from the Scrap Tire Program here exhibits an undeniable hostility to religion that offends the Constitution’s essential mandate of religious neutrality,” lawyers for the church charged in a brief filed last April.

That was a year ago. But once President Donald Trump nominated Gorsuch in January, the court scheduled the dispute for oral arguments in April — perhaps anticipating that the Senate would get around to confirming the new associate justice by then and the Supreme Court would have a full bench.

Barry Lynn, the executive director of Americans United for Separation of Church and State, a group that advocates for a strong wall between religious freedom and government intrusion, said Gorsuch’s record as an appeals judge suggests where his loyalties might lie in a case of this magnitude.

Gorsuch has displayed an “apparent disinterest in preserving what we consider legitimate religious freedom rights and substituting a view that has developed in the last decade or so,” said Lynn, whose group joined with other religious and civil liberties organizations and filed a legal brief supporting Missouri.

“We were not happy about Neil Gorsuch’s confirmation,” Lynn added.

The Trinity Lutheran case has all the elements of a blockbuster: a sympathetic religious school, claims that Missouri discriminated against it, and a tug-of-war between the federal Constitution and the state’s own charter, which prohibits that public funds be given to “any church, sect or denomination of religion.”

Dozens of organizations have also filed briefs in the dispute, and so far Trinity Lutheran appears to have more friends supporting it — the coalition includes major denominations, Christian colleges, members of Congress and conservative-leaning states.

Alliance Defending Freedom, the legal advocacy group defending the church before the Supreme Court, wasn’t shy about its endorsement of Gorsuch. In a news release praising his confirmation, the group called him “a natural successor to Justice Scalia.”

In an interview, Erik Stanley, a senior attorney with Alliance, pointed to Gorsuch’s record as a judge as a harbinger of how he might approach Wednesday’s hearing.

“We do know that Justice Gorsuch has been a friend to religious liberty in the cases that have appeared before him,” Stanley told The Huffington Post. “He’s had the opportunity to rule on religious liberty issues a few times. He’s always been positive to religious liberty. We hope that that continues in this case.”

It is not for secular courts to rewrite the religious complaint of a faithful adherent.
From Judge Neil Gorsuch’s concurrence in the Hobby Lobby case

But Stanley added that he hopes “all nine justices” on the Supreme Court see Missouri’s treatment of Trinity Lutheran as “blatant religious status discrimination” — since the program under which its school applied for funds was supposed to be applied neutrally to all schools, no matter their affiliation or lack of one.

Gorsuch’s strongest endorsement of religious freedom to date came in none other than the controversial Hobby Lobby case, a religious challenge to the Affordable Care Act’s requirement that employers provide free contraceptive coverage to all employees. Before that case headed to the Supreme Court, the judge wrote a pointed concurrence supporting the Green family, the Hobby Lobby owners who claimed that complying with federal law would be a “substantial” burden on their Christian faith.

“As the Greens describe it, it is their personal involvement in facilitating access to devices and drugs that can have the effect of destroying a fertilized human egg that their religious faith holds impermissible,” wrote Gorsuch in 2013. “And as we have seen, it is not for secular courts to rewrite the religious complaint of a faithful adherent, or to decide whether a religious teaching about complicity imposes too much moral disapproval on those only indirectly assisting wrongful conduct.”

During his confirmation hearings in March, Gorsuch defended his court’s decision in that case, which was later upheld by an ideologically split Supreme Court. The high court ruled that religiously owned corporations were covered by a federal law that limits how the government may burden a person’s exercise of religion.

Gorsuch told members of Congress they could always go back to the drawing board and rewrite the law.

“It has all of those options available, Senator,” Gorsuch said during an exchange with Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) during his hearings. “And if we got it wrong, I’m sorry. But we did our level best, and we were affirmed by the United States Supreme Court. And it’s a dialog — like any statutory dialog between Congress and the courts.”

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_2’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

 

In the Trinity Lutheran case, the stakes are even higher because a majority of the Supreme Court could be convinced to read the First Amendment of the Constitution as providing a ceiling for how states may restrict funding to churches and religiously affiliated entities.

The state of Missouri, at least until a new governor took office in January, maintained that its constitution treats all churches equally — and that its funding prohibition shouldn’t be seen as proof of religious bigotry.

“Trinity Lutheran remains free, without any public subsidy, to worship, teach, pray, and practice any other aspect of its faith however it wishes,” read the brief signed by lawyers from its prior administration. “The State merely declines to offer financial support.”

In 2004, the Supreme Court upheld a similar Washington State constitutional provision that denied funding to college students pursuing “devotional” theological studies. But the court that decided that case looked a lot different than the present court — which has since decided Hobby Lobby and has been more amenable to religious claims.

Gregory Lipper, a former church-state litigator with Americans United who is now in private practice, said things could continue down that path now that Gorsuch is on the court.

“He may well cast the decisive vote holding that Missouri taxpayers are required to fund the church’s renovations,” he said.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Alex Jones' Conspiratorial Rants Irrelevant To Custody Battle, Judge Rules

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

AUSTIN, Texas ― Alex Jones may act like an unhinged conspiracy theorist when he’s at work hosting his popular Infowars radio show, but he’s nothing like the character he has created when he gets home to his family, his lawyers say.

The jury trial in his contentious child custody battled kicked off Tuesday, with his ex-wife’s lawyers hoping to focus the proceedings on the outrageous claims, spiteful comments and public drunkenness they say he displays on air. But at the risk of undermining the public persona Jones has crafted, his lawyers in the heated battle continued to insist the bombastic personality that made him a cult figure among some on the political right is nothing more than “satire.”

The spectacle of parading Jones’ provocative comments to a jury charged with deciding the fate of his children has added further intrigue to the custody trial, but it’s unclear whether the legal strategy will discredit him as a father. Attorneys for Jones’ ex-wife had only middling success using the provocateur’s on-air persona against him.

Travis County Judge Orlinda Naranjo refused to admit as evidence a recording of Jones lobbing darts at a picture of Hillary Clinton in the presence of his teenage son, arguing that Jones’ ideology shouldn’t be used to measure his ability as a parent. For the same reason, Naranjo denied the admittance of other clips or ordered Kelly’s lawyers to cut out sections with political commentary or offensive comments about women.

“I’m not going to make this case about his political views,” Naranjo said.

The jury, however, will hear several examples of Jones’ work that the judge viewed as relevant to his parenting, including a clip in which his son appeared on the show and another of Jones bragging about how much whiskey he could drink without being affected.

“I’m gonna piss on some tree or something,” an apparently drunk Jones says in one recording that will be presented at trial. “The age of fake bullshit is over. The return of man is here. Get ready because it’s going to run your ass over!”

The judge did not consider the “return of man” comment political speech because she did not know what it meant.

In another video, Jones strips to his underwear while ranting about the FBI. His ex-wife’s attorneys argued the video corroborated an ongoing problem with stripping that also affects Jones off the air.

“He just takes his clothes off,” attorney Bobby Newman said, adding that Jones once removed his shirt during a family therapy session with his children.

A recording of Jones questioning whether former President Barack Obama is the legitimate father of Malia and Sasha Obama, broadcast on Infowars Friday, may also make its way into the trial. 

I’m gonna piss on some tree or something.
Alex Jones, in a recording to be presented in his custody hearing

Lawyers for Jones’ ex-wife, Kelly, argue that Jones’ role on the show is emblematic of paranoiac tendencies that define him as a father. He “intends to enmesh the children” in his show, Newman said during his opening statement. “That’s his plan for them.”

And while Kelly home-schooled the kids for years, then located an elite academy to enroll them in, Jones struggled to remember basic details about their teachers or studies in depositions, in one instance saying a large bowl of chili had clouded his memory, Newman said.

But Jones’ lawyers played down the relevance of Jones’ ranting on Infowars, describing it as little more than “political satire” that has no effect on him when his work day is done.

“He has a message,” David Minton, one of Jones’ attorneys, told the jury. “He has done it with humor. He has done it with sarcasm. He has done done it with wit. That is what he does for a living … . This case is about ― and only about ― three precious, beautiful, wonderful children.”

Kelly Jones’ legal team will have to do more than prove Jones’ on-air offensiveness to win custody of the children.

Alex and Kelly Jones divorced in 2015. They signed an agreement granting primary custody to the father and limiting the mother to supervised visits. Her restricted access to their kids stemmed partly from an outburst, recorded by one of the children, that therapists viewed as abusive. She currently receives supervised visits every other Saturday and on Tuesday afternoons. “You’re going to come to understand why,” Minton told the jury.

The jury heard a chilling five-minute recording in which Kelly Jones yelled repeatedly at her young children, while one of her daughters, noticeably frightened, tried to tell her she loved her.

Adding to the case’s complexity, Allison Wilcox ― the guardian ad lidem, who represented the interests of the kids at court during the divorce proceedings ― said she asked the children to record their mother at the request of one of several therapists who were treating them. Wilcox said it was unusual to ask kids to record their parents without their knowledge and denied that Alex Jones had put them up to it.

Nevertheless, Wilcox described Kelly Jones’ outburst as emotionally abusive and filed a report after hearing the recording with Child Protective Services. Another recording of a conversation with her kids that Kelly made herself raised similar concerns and led to another CPS report.

Wilcox did say Alex Jones had in some instances bad-mouthed his kids’ mother in front of them. She said he had exhibited narcissistic and paranoid “tendencies,” though he had never received a full-blown diagnosis of a mental disorder. And he was subjected several times to random alcohol testing during the course of the divorce proceedings, all of which he passed, Wilcox said.

But despite repeated probing from Kelly Jones’ lawyers, Wilcox did not describe what Jones did as “abusive” ― a damning label that she did apply to his ex-wife’s behavior.

Known for his bombastic and aggressive style, Alex Jones struggled to contain himself when his ex-wife’s legal team spoke. “Judge, can you tell Mr. Jones to stop making faces and shaking his head?” Newman said as he delivered his opening statement. The judge twice told him to stop or risk getting tossed out of the courtroom.

The trial will continue for the following two weeks, with several therapists and the children’s school principal expected to testify. Alex Jones himself has yet to take the stand.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Facebook Spaces finally delivers on social VR

Three years ago, when Facebook bought Oculus for $2 billion, many scratched their heads in befuddlement. Social networks and virtual reality seem like such strange bedfellows; one is about connecting you to the world, while the other appears to do th…