Mozilla Working To Improve Performance Of Firefox On Older Machines

If you’re not a fan of Google’s Chrome browser, there are plenty of alternatives out there, such as Mozilla’s Firefox. However if you’ve felt that Firefox can be a bit sluggish similar to Chrome, not to worry as Mozilla is working on changing that in a new “performance” feature that is meant to help improve the browser’s performance, especially on older machines.

In the past Mozilla has claimed that Firefox is used quite a bit on older machines with less than optimal specs, which is why some users are complaining about the browser’s performance when it really isn’t Mozilla’s fault. However to address that, Mozilla is making some changes, one of which is an “optimize Firefox” button.

When pressed, this button basically kills/disables any extensions that you might be using, thus making the browser potentially run a lot smoother. The extensions will still be there and users can re-enable them after. Another feature Mozilla is working on is in the form of content processes, where in future builds it will support three or more content processes versus the two (core and content) right now.

There will also be options for users to disable certain UI features, such as animations for tabs, menus, and so on. The idea is that if you have a computer that doesn’t have much RAM, disabling these features could help speed things up. These features are still in the works which means that you might not be able to expect them to be released anytime soon, but they could be worth looking out for in the future.

Mozilla Working To Improve Performance Of Firefox On Older Machines , original content from Ubergizmo. Read our Copyrights and terms of use.

Nintendo Switch Is The Fastest-Selling Console In Nintendo’s History

Just like how the Samsung Galaxy S8 represented a second chance for Samsung following the disaster that was the Note 7, the Nintendo Switch represents Nintendo’s second chance after the Wii U had flopped rather badly. Turns out that everyone loves a good comeback story and that customers are pretty forgiving, or at least that’s what the numbers are showing.

According to a recent press release put out by Nintendo, the company has revealed that the Nintendo Switch is the fastest-selling console in Nintendo’s history. According to numbers from the NPD Group, Nintendo managed to sell 906,000 units of the Switch in the month of March alone, and this is just the US market we are talking about.

However earlier figures have suggested that the console is doing well in other markets that it has launched in, such as Japan where they sold 300,000 units in its first week. In addition, it seems that The Legend of Zelda: Breath of the Wild has sold equally well and has apparently sold more than 925,000 units for the Switch, and 460,000 units for the Wii U, meaning that the game has racked up over 1.3 million units sold to date.

This shouldn’t be surprising as Breath of the Wild is probably the biggest game that was available at launch, and had a near one-to-one attach rate. So far reviews of the Switch have been largely positive save for some issues here and there, while Breath of the Wild has scored near-perfect reviews.

Nintendo Switch Is The Fastest-Selling Console In Nintendo’s History , original content from Ubergizmo. Read our Copyrights and terms of use.

NVIDIA’s Spring Game Sale has come into full bloom

What better way to welcome the new season of life than by bursting into a spending spree, right? While gamers probably wished there were no need to wait for seasons to have sales, we’ll take what we can. NVIDIA has just kicked off Spring with a SHIELD-centric sale. And while the titles are admittedly on the thin side, at least … Continue reading

Trump Makes His First Big Changes To Obamacare

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

President Donald Trump’s administration has taken its first action to change the way the health insurance marketplaces created by the Affordable Care Act operate, aiming to shore them up for next year’s sign-up period.

The regulation published by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services on Thursday is a response to insurers’ demands that federal authorities take steps to limit consumers’ ability to drop in and out of the insurance market. Such “gaming” of the system drives up costs for the carriers that must cover the consumers’ claims.

The overall consequence of the new rules is that health insurance will be harder to buy in 2018, especially for people whose circumstances change during the year, enabling them to buy policies outside the annual sign-up period. The length of that sign-up period is also cut in half.

Other aspects of the regulation could make coverage less comprehensive, reduce the value of the tax credit subsidies that make premiums more affordable for low- and middle-income people, and allow insurers to offer plans with fewer medical providers in their networks.

These new policies are intended to make the exchanges more attractive to insurance companies next year, after more insurers pulled out of the program this year. Consumers may be forced to endure more hassles in order to keep insurers in the fold because without the insurers, there’s no coverage to buy.

But the new rules are arguably more notable for what they don’t address: subsidies for so-called cost-sharing reductions, which are paid to insurers covering the poorest enrollees. Trump has threatened to cut off those payments and send the markets into a tailspin in an unorthodox bid to pressure Democrats into supporting his plan to repeal the Affordable Care Act.

That’s why even the insurance industry ― which got a lot of what it asked for from the Trump administration in this regulation ― isn’t satisfied. The cost-sharing reductions are the industry’s most pressing concern, and Trump’s comments Wednesday that he might end them have heightened anxiety about what the exchanges will look like next year.

Marilyn Tavenner, CEO of America’s Health Insurance Plans, praised the aspects of the regulation designed to ease regulatory burdens on insurers and impose stricter requirements on consumers.

But she said in a press release, “There is still too much instability and uncertainty in this market. Most urgently, health plans and the consumers they serve need to know that funding for cost-sharing reduction subsidies will continue uninterrupted.”

“Without funding, millions of Americans who buy their own plan will be harmed. Many plans will likely drop out of the market. Premiums will go up sharply ― nearly 20 percent ― across the market. Costs will go up for taxpayers. And doctors and hospitals will see even greater strains on their ability to care for people. We urge Congress and the administration to act now to guarantee funding for cost-sharing reduction subsidies,” said Tavenner, who previously ran the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.

Under the Affordable Care Act, insurers are required to reduce deductibles, copayments and other forms of cost-sharing for the lowest-income enrollees who use the exchanges, and the federal government is supposed to reimburse them for the lost money. In 2014, however, House Republicans sued then-President Barack Obama’s administration, arguing that the federal government was making those payments without authorization from Congress. A federal judge last year agreed with the GOP lawmakers, and the Obama administration appealed. When Trump became president, his administration became the defendant in the case. The two sides soon obtained delays from the appeals court while they decided how to proceed.

For now, the Trump administration has continued making those payments. Some House Republicans have expressed support for keeping the money flowing or even authorizing the spending, which would resolve the legal dispute.

But Trump told The Wall Street Journal this week that he believes a threat to the viability of the insurance marketplaces could be leverage to force Democrats to the negotiating table. Democratic leaders have forcefully rejected this gambit and demanded that money for the cost-sharing subsidies be included in a pending federal spending bill.

Absent clarity on the subsidies, insurance companies may be reluctant to participate in the exchanges next year or, at a minimum, may request very high rate increases in order to cover their losses if the payments don’t continue. This could destabilize the troubled market just as analysts like Standard & Poor’s believe it may be righting itself.

The ways in which the regulation, which is little-changed from a proposed draft published in February, benefits insurers might not be enough.

“While [the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services] has taken steps to correct some of the current challenges in the marketplace, these changes likely are not significant enough to sway health plan decisions for the upcoming plan year,” Cara Kelly, vice president at Avalere Health, said in a press release. “Losing health plans from the exchanges is still a risk for 2018.”

What’s more, the changes the administration is making could actually reduce overall enrollment and discourage healthier, and thus less costly, consumers from signing up.

These are the key elements of the new regulation: 

  • The open enrollment period will be half as long as originally proposed. Sign-ups for 2018 health coverage will run from Nov. 1 to Dec. 15, 2017, instead of going until Jan. 31, 2018. This could make it more difficult to spread the word about enrollment and provide assistance in signing up. The administration argues it will prevent people from waiting until they get sick to buy policies, something they have more time to do during a longer enrollment period.

  • Insurance companies will be allowed to refuse to sell policies to consumers who fail to make all their premium payments this year. The Obama administration gave consumers a 90-day grace period before they could be kicked out for nonpayment. It didn’t allow insurers to demand that money be paid back before enrolling people in coverage for the following year. The Trump rules permit, but don’t require, insurers to collect unpaid premiums.

  • People who need to obtain coverage after the open enrollment period will have to prove it. Certain life changes ― such as getting married, having a child or moving ― give consumers the opportunity to buy plans at any point during the year. Under Obama, these people merely had to attest to their new circumstances; Trump will require documentation. Insurers complained that people used these “special enrollment periods” to get coverage only when they needed medical care.

  • Insurers will be allowed to sell skimpier plans. The Affordable Care Act defines four “metal” levels of coverage ― bronze, silver, gold and platinum ― that offer increasingly more generous coverage that, in general, comes with increasingly higher premiums. Each metal level must cover a certain percentage of a typical person’s medical expenses. For instance, a silver plan has to cover at least 70 percent. Obama allowed plans to vary within their metal level by 2 percentage points in either direction. Trump will give them more leeway. A silver plan could cover between 66 percent and 72 percent of medical costs. This has a side effect of potentially lowering the value of the tax credit subsidies for premiums, because they’re based in part on the cost of the second-cheapest silver plan in each geographic area. If that benchmark silver plan covers only 66 percent of medical expenses, it will have a lower price, and that lower price will lead to smaller subsidies for all policies in that locale.

  • Insurers will be allowed to include fewer “essential community providers” in their networks. Narrow network plans are a key way for insurers to keep costs down by excluding the most expensive providers. Obama required them to include at least 30 percent of area health providers that care for “medically underserved” and poor patients. Trump will reduce that threshold to 20 percent and leave it to states or private accrediting entities to determine whether an insurance policy has enough providers in its network.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

The time for Uber leadership to step down is long overdue

It seems like hardly a week goes by without Uber fending off bad press. If it isn’t sexual harassment stories or driver disputes, it’s self-driving car accidents and reports of sleazy business practices. The situation has gotten so bad that employees…

Nintendo Has Discontinued The NES Classic Edition

The NES Classic Edition was officially launched last year, but it seems that about a year after its launch, Nintendo has decided that they are done with the console and have announced that they will be discontinuing the device. This means that if you weren’t quick or lucky enough to find a unit in stock, there will be no more chances.

Nintendo confirmed the discontinuation in a statement to IGN which reads, “Throughout April, NOA territories will receive the last shipments of Nintendo Entertainment System: NES Classic Edition systems for this year. We encourage anyone interested in obtaining this system to check with retail outlets regarding availability.”

For those who are surprised and disappointed, the Nintendo rep also told IGN that the NES Classic Edition wasn’t meant to be an ongoing product in the first place. “NES Classic Edition wasn’t intended to be an ongoing, long-term product. However, due to high demand, we did add extra shipments to our original plans.”

It is a bit strange that Nintendo would discontinue the device, especially when you consider how well-received it has been and how much money the company has made from its sales. We’re not sure if Nintendo will change their minds at a later date, but for now it seems that if you wanted the device you’ll want to move fast before it is too late.

Nintendo Has Discontinued The NES Classic Edition , original content from Ubergizmo. Read our Copyrights and terms of use.

YouTube Has A Hidden Dark Mode You Can Enable

Image credit – _paul-/Reddit

Dark and light themes are something that has been pretty common and has been offered for quite a while now. However in recent times, it seems that there is a greater emphasis on the feature, with apps such as Twitter finally introducing a night mode after all these years. Now it seems that YouTube has a similar feature you can check out.

In a post on Reddit (via 9to5Google), it turns out that YouTube has a hidden dark mode feature that users can enable if they want. Note that this only applies to the web version of YouTube, so if you’re on your phone, it looks like the feature hasn’t made its way onto the app just yet. As you can see in the screenshot above, it basically turns your entire YouTube black and it applies to every aspect of the platform save for the creator studio.

Note that this seems to only work for Chrome at the moment, so it is possible that Google is testing out the feature before making it an option for other browsers. To enable dark mode, you’ll want to hit Ctrl+ Shift + I (or Option + Command + I on Mac). Go to the “Console” tab and paste document.cookie=”VISITOR_INFO1_LIVE=fPQ4jCL6EiE; path=/”. Alternatively if that doesn’t work, try document.cookie=”VISITOR_INFO1_LIVE=fPQ4jCL6EiE” instead.

Close the developer tools and refresh the page and click your YouTube profile image (you’ll need to be signed into your account) and click the section titled “Dark Mode”, and you should be good to go! You might have to sign in and out again if it doesn’t work, but these are the steps.

YouTube Has A Hidden Dark Mode You Can Enable , original content from Ubergizmo. Read our Copyrights and terms of use.

Tesla To Unveil The Finished Model 3 In July

The Tesla Model 3 has been talked about at great length simply because the Model 3 represents an electric car from Tesla that will not cost customers an arm and a leg to own. Compared to the other models offered by Tesla, like the Model X which is priced above $60,000, the Model 3 by comparison will be around $30,000 after taking into account federal incentives.

That being said for those who are curious about what the final/finished Model 3 will look like, the wait will soon be over. In a tweet by Elon Musk in response to a question from a customer, it seems that the finished Model 3 will be unveiled in July. No specific dates in July were mentioned, but if you’re curious then that’s the timeframe that we’ve been given.

In a report from earlier this year, it was confirmed that production of car is expected to begin in July so we guess it makes sense that the final version will be shown off then as well. So far it seems that whatever Tesla has shown off has been pretty well-received because back in October 2016, it was revealed that the Model 3 had been sold out through mid-2018, so if you haven’t reserved one for yourself then you’ll have to wait until next year or even later to get your hands on it.

Tesla To Unveil The Finished Model 3 In July , original content from Ubergizmo. Read our Copyrights and terms of use.

Hulu live TV tipped at $39.99 per month, a penny shy of $40 threshold

Hulu‘s live television service is in a very closed beta at the moment, and we still don’t know how much it will cost once it goes live. We’ve heard various rumors over the past several months, all of them gravitating around the $30/month range, and now a new report has surfaced with a new tipped monthly rate: $39.99/month. If that … Continue reading

Terrifying Video Shows 2 Bullets Narrowly Missing 4-Year-Old Girl's Head

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

A 4-year-old girl in Chandler, Arizona, was almost hit by two gunshots fired into the window of her grandfather’s barbershop by a disgruntled patron of a nearby tattoo parlor, police said.

Surveillance video released on Wednesday shows the girl sitting in a barbershop chair on Monday when a bullet suddenly crashes through the window, just inches from her head. Seconds later, a second shot pierces the window on the other side of the girl’s head, sending her running away screaming. 

The unidentified girl was hit by flying glass. She was treated for minor injuries at a nearby hospital, according to AZFamily.com.

Investigators said the shots were fired by a man upset that he was asked to leave Damaged Ink Tattoo, located next door to the barbershop, according to AzCentral.com.

“Investigators believe that the shooter was outside in the parking lot,” Sgt. Daniel Meija told Phoenix TV station KPHO. “We believe that the intent was to shoot towards the tattoo shop, but ended up striking the business, which is right next door, which is the barbershop.”

“I heard five gunshots go off in a row and then heard a woman screaming and a baby crying as well,” said Michelle Cohrs, who was inside a chiropractor’s office in the same shopping center. “I was extremely scared.”

Tattoo parlor employees quickly identified 23-year-old Michael Hart as the suspect. They said he was a regular at the business.

Hart told his girlfriend he had “popped off” some rounds, she said in an interview with investigators, according to what Chandler Detective Seth Tyler told AzCentral.com.

Hart was charged with one count of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, two counts of child endangerment, one count of discharging of a firearm within city limits, one count of possession of a weapon by a prohibited person, and one count of discharging a firearm at a non-residence.

A second suspect, 21-year-old Rafael Santos, was arrested after a witness reported seeing him with Hart at the time of the shooting. He has been charged with discharging a firearm at a non-residence, aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, and two counts of endangerment of a minor.

In the mugshots below, Hart is on the left, and Santos is on the right.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.