Some States, Cities Still Banning Government Travel To North Carolina

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

A number of states and cities will continue to ban government-funded travel to North Carolina due to the state’s failure to totally repeal HB2, the anti-LGBTQ law that barred transgender people from using the bathroom that corresponds with their gender identity.

Although the NCAA ended its boycott against the state once a repeal bill was passed, many of the states and cities that banned nonessential official travel to North Carolina last year have decided the new bill doesn’t adequately protect LGBTQ people. 

Two states continuing their bans are California and Washington

“California’s law was enacted to ensure that, with limited exceptions, our taxpayer resources are not spent in states that authorize discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression,” the state’s attorney general, Xavier Becerra (D), said Wednesday in a statement. “North Carolina’s new law does not cure the infirmity of this type of discrimination.”

“We must continue to stand up for the rights of all people,” Washington Gov. Jay Inslee (D) said Thursday. “North Carolina is continuing discriminatory policies and this is not something the state of Washington condones or supports.”

State lawmakers approved legislation last month that repeals the so-called “bathroom bill,” but the new law bars cities from passing ordinances that expand nondiscrimination protections for LGBTQ people. It also bans municipalities and the University of North Carolina from regulating bathroom access without the legislature’s permission. 

LGBTQ rights advocates have strongly criticized those provisions. Human Rights Campaign President Chad Griffin said the new bill, HB142, “doubled-down on discrimination.” He also accused North Carolina Gov. Roy Cooper (D) and the legislature of fueling “the flames of anti-transgender hate.”

Equality NC, the state’s largest LGBTQ advocacy group, praised the cities and states continuing to oppose the North Carolina law.

“Cities across the country are seeing HB142 for what it really is — a fake repeal of HB2,” the group’s executive director, Chris Sgro, said in a statement. “The new law continues to make North Carolina the only state in the nation to reserve for itself the exclusive ability to regulate bathroom access and one of only three states to ban cities from passing crucial non-discrimination protections.” 

Other places that have reissued bans or are maintaining existing ones are Minnesota; Chicago; New York City; Seattle; Atlanta; Los Angeles; Salt Lake City; Cincinnati; Washington, D.C.; Portland, Oregon; Portland, Maine; Baltimore; Burlington, Vermont; San Francisco; Oakland, California; West Palm Beach, Florida; Wilton Manors; Florida; and Palm Springs, California.  

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Immigrants' Kids Stage Heartbreaking Protest At White House

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

WASHINGTON — American children whose parents are undocumented immigrants brought a heartrending plea to the White House and President Donald Trump on Thursday: Don’t make us orphans in our own country.

The kids, among dozens who were organized by the group We Belong Together, fear that Trump’s crackdown on illegal immigration could deport their parents, even if they haven’t run afoul of the law in any other way.

Deportations dramatically increased during the Obama administration, but the focus was on immigrants who had committed serious crimes. The Trump administration’s orders stepping up enforcement include just about anyone.

Those undocumented immigrants often have American children. And they are afraid.

“I live with the fear of being separated from my mother every day,” said Leah, an 11-year-old from Miami whose mother is a domestic worker facing a deportation order.

“It is like when somebody you care about can die at any moment,” she added, standing outside the White House, accompanied by activists and other kids.  “Why can’t I just enjoy being a kid? I cannot sleep or do my homework. All I can think about is my mother being taken away from me. I am so worried about my life.”

A mom of two children who is in hiding narrowly avoided likely deportation in February, when she sought sanctuary in a Denver chuch. Jeanette Vizguerra, who has reported to Immigration and Customs Enforcement regularly for 20 years while she sought a visa to escape violence in Mexico, fled a hearing on her case when her advocates noticed a squad of police apparently ready to arrest her.

“My mom has been going through the struggle of getting threatened and us getting scared by ICE,” said her son, Roberto, 10.

I think it’s not fair for children to be living in fear or for parents not to be able to be with their children,” said her daughter, Luna, 12.

While those children and others all spoke of the worry they have of their own government, they also declared they would not relent in their bids to keep their families and other kids’ families whole.

“I want to tell Mr. Trump that he is a bully, and no matter how mean he is, and no matter how hard he tries, he will never break out spirit,” Leah said. “We are not afraid of you.”

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Nintendo's fastest-selling console ever couldn't top 'Zelda'

Nintendo has been proclaiming that the Switch is its fastest-selling console ever since the system launched, but now it has numbers to back that up. Based on NPD reports, it says the Switch sold 906,000 units in the US in March. What’s surprising, ho…

U.S. Allegedly Planning Preventative Strike Against North Korea: Report (Update)

The United States is planning a preventative strike against North Korea if it decides to carry out another nuclear weapons test, according to NBC News citing multiple U.S. officials.

Read more…

iPhone 8 renders reveal what the handset may look like

Designer Benjamin Geskin has published a series of high quality renders revealing what the iPhone 8 may look like, assuming many of the biggest leaks and rumors thus far are true. Geskin tasks himself with making realistic-looking renders based on such leaks, and his work is great to say the least. This time around, we see a sleek iPhone with … Continue reading

If the 2018 Porsche Panamera Sport Turismo can’t convince you wagons are sexy, it’s hopeless

It’s an oddity of American automotive taste: people who write about cars invariably love wagons, while the public which actually buys cars does not. Automakers have been forced to try all manner of tricks and sleight of hand – witness the trend of jacked-up crossovers – to try to get the US to warm to the wagon, but if all … Continue reading

This Helps Explain Why United’s PR Response Was Such A Disaster

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

When United Airlines first responded this week to a video showing a passenger being violently dragged from one of its planes, the company apparently didn’t understand ― or know how to deal with ― the level of public rage it was facing.

One crucial factor contributing to that failure is that the company’s head of corporate communications reports to its head of human resources and labor relations. This set-up puts the company at a disadvantage when it has to respond quickly and effectively to a public crisis, said Jeffrey Schneider, a corporate communications veteran and founder of The Lead PR. 

“You don’t want to have layers of bureaucracy or management in between the top communications person and the CEO,” Schneider told The Huffington Post.

And crucially, Schneider said, this arrangement can keep the CEO from hearing advice directly from the person most qualified to give it. He advises having the head of PR report directly to the CEO.

United’s unwieldy communications chain is particularly striking considering that airlines can be at the center of a number of PR nightmares, from routine weather delays that strand passengers to catastrophic accidents, at any given time.

“You would imagine that a company that has the potential for these kinds of crises would house their communications team with as direct a line to the CEO as possible,” Schneider said. 

American Airlines, JetBlue and Southwest Airlines have organizations that mirror this advice, but Delta’s executive arrangement is similar to that of United.

United’s first statement after the video began going viral reflected the priorities of its communications chain: a heavily lawyered proclamation of victim-blaming that used euphemisms (“re-accommodate”) to avoid blame, supported employees’ unsupportable decisions, and failed to offer an unqualified apology. In short, it made no sense as a public relations move. 

United “was talking to employees” with that message, Justin Bachman, an aviation reporter at Bloomberg, told NPR’s “On Point.”

“They wanted the employee base to know that ‘Hey, we’re with you and we’re not going to throw anybody under the bus that works for United,’” he said. “That might have made sense internally, but it completely fell flat in the public arena.”

 A spokeswoman for United Airlines declined to comment.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

These Are The 7 Men Scheduled To Be Executed In Arkansas This Month

Officials in Arkansas plan to execute seven death row prisoners over 11 days this month.

The rush to the gurney has been blamed on the state’s supply of the lethal injection drug midazolam, which is set to expire this month. The state does not have a replacement, and controversy over the drug has made it more difficult to obtain as companies refuse to sell it. Midazolam has been linked to botched executions in Arizona, Ohio and Oklahoma.

The Department of Corrections has scheduled the executions to take place between April 17 and April 27. The deadly marathon will mark the first time in more than a decade that anyone has been put to death in the state.

These are the men facing execution.

David Lohr covers crime and missing persons. Tips? Feedback? Send an email or follow him on Twitter.  

type=type=RelatedArticlesblockTitle=Related… + articlesList=58d969d5e4b00f68a5c965c2,55e47ab3e4b0b7a963399ae6

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

The Anti-Defamation League Is Offering Sean Spicer Remedial Holocaust Lessons

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

White House press secretary Sean Spicer kicked off the Jewish holiday of Passover with comments many have described as by-the-book Holocaust-denial. Now, the Anti-Defamation League is offering Spicer and his colleagues remedial lessons in Holocaust awareness to ensure it doesn’t happen again.

During a press briefing on Tuesday, Spicer compared Syrian President Bashar Assad to German dictator Adolf Hitler, who, according to Spicer, “didn’t even sink to using chemical weapons.”

Jonathan A. Greenblatt, CEO of ADL, sent Spicer a letter on Thursday offering to conduct a training on Holocaust awareness for the press secretary and his staff.

“When the first days of Passover ended and we turned on our phones and televisions yesterday evening, we learned about your comment that Hitler did not gas his own people,” Greenblatt wrote in the letter, published on ADL’s website. “Your comparisons between Assad and Hitler were not only historically inaccurate but they also were inappropriate and offensive.”

The Nazis, under Hitler’s leadership, gassed millions of Jewish people in death camps. Spicer attempted several times to clarify his remarks and faced intense backlash from lawmakers and organizations like the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum.

Steven Goldstein, executive director of the Anne Frank Center for Mutual Respect, called for Spicer’s resignation in a statement on Twitter, saying the press secretary had “engaged in Holocaust denial, the most offensive form of fake news imaginable.”

Later that day, Spicer offer an apology when he was interviewed by CNN’s Wolf Blitzer.

“I was obviously trying to make a point about the heinous acts that Assad had made against his own people last week using chemical weapons and gas, and frankly, I mistakenly used an inappropriate and insensitive reference to the Holocaust, for which, frankly, there is no comparison. And for that I apologize. It was a mistake to do that,” Spicer said. 

But for many critics, Spicer’s comments constituted more than a one-off “mistake.”

“Spicer’s Tuesday comments are but the latest in a series of anti-Semitic dog whistles and Holocaust denials emanating from the president, his staff, and his family,” wrote Vox’s Jacob Gardenswartz on Wednesday.

Many pointed to the White House’s Holocaust Remembrance Day statement, which did not mention the Jewish people ― an erasure that is also a common tactic of Holocaust deniers.

“While you have apologized, this week’s incident as well as others (notably, the International Holocaust Remembrance Day statement omitting Jews and your vociferous defense of it), have exposed a serious gap in your knowledge of the Holocaust, its impact, and the lessons we can learn from it,” wrote Greenblatt.

The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Read the full letter below:

Dear Mr. Spicer:

This week Jews around the world have spent time with their families celebrating Passover, the feast of freedom. In the Passover liturgy, we read that in each generation there will be those who rise up to harm the Jewish people, much like Pharaoh in ancient times and Hitler in modern times. Understanding and being keenly aware of our history – to “never forget” – is part of Passover and part of the Jewish experience.

Unfortunately, when the first days of Passover ended and we turned on our phones and televisions yesterday evening, we learned about your comment that Hitler did not gas his own people. Your comparisons between Assad and Hitler were not only historically inaccurate but they also were inappropriate and offensive.

While you have apologized, this week’s incident as well as others (notably, the International Holocaust Remembrance Day statement omitting Jews and your vociferous defense of it), have exposed a serious gap in your knowledge of the Holocaust, its impact, and the lessons we can learn from it.

For decades, ADL has been at the forefront of Holocaust education, providing trainings about the Nazi atrocities to a wide range of groups. We have conducted trainings for more than 130,000 law enforcement professionals and more than 35,447 educators, reaching more than 1,000,000 students. Our programs provide historical context for how the Holocaust was able to occur; teach the Holocaust as a human story; and create opportunities for critical thinking. Each of these educational programs focuses on the consequences of unchecked bigotry and hate.

ADL would be happy to conduct one of these trainings at your convenience for you, your staff, and anyone at the White House who may need to learn more about the Holocaust. We know you are very busy, but we believe a few hours learning this history will help you understand where you went wrong and prevent you from making these mistakes in the future.

Sincerely,

Jonathan A. Greenblatt

CEO

Anti-Defamation League

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Democrats Say They Will Fight Trump Over Health Insurance Subsidies

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

Get ready for another big congressional fight over Obamacare.

The flashpoint this time is a key funding stream for the program ― one that subsidizes insurers so they can offer low-income consumers plans with reduced out-of-pocket expenses.

President Donald Trump suggested in a Wednesday Wall Street Journal interview that he and other Republicans might cut off the funds. Now Democrats are saying they’ll fight this by demanding that Congress include the money as part of a spending bill that is supposed to keep the government running past April.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) “will be pushing hard for it as part of the negotiations,” a senior Democratic leadership aide told The Huffington Post.

An aide to House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said that the issue is her “top priority” in the negotiations.

The politics of the emerging conflict are complicated and unpredictable, and one possible outcome is an impasse that prevents the spending bill from passing. In other words, another government shutdown over Obamacare could be in the offing.

But the stakes in the fight are higher than normal, because withholding the money could throw insurance markets into disarray ― potentially unraveling insurance coverage for millions of people. In the Journal interview, Trump said he hoped that would motivate Democrats to negotiate with him over repeal.

Democrats, predictably, are having none of it. They say they are happy to talk about modifying the health care law ― but only if Republicans agree to leave the bulk of the coverage expansion in place, and only if Trump stops trying to sabotage the law.

The payments in question ― so-called cost-sharing reductions, or CSRs ― reimburse insurers for providing more generous coverage to consumers with incomes below 250 percent of the poverty line. That’s $61,500 for a family of four.

The 2010 Affordable Care Act instructs the federal government to make these payments, but it does not actually appropriate the money. The Obama administration paid the money anyway, saying it had legal authority to do so. House Republicans then launched a lawsuit over the payments.

Last year, a federal district court ruled the payments unconstitutional but also stayed the decision, assuming the Obama administration would appeal ― which it did.

As long as the decision is stayed, the federal government can continue to pay the money. But the Trump administration hasn’t indicated whether it will keep the Obama administration appeal going. That’s rattled insurers, who are busy calculating rates for next year ― and, in some cases, deciding whether to keep offering exchange coverage at all.

If the money were to vanish, insurers couldn’t simply stop offering the plans with the reduced cost-sharing. Instead, they’d be required by law to keep offering them ― and to account for the extra expense by raising premiums for everyone.

Doing so would likely mean raising premiums for the typical plan by 19 percent, according to an analysis by the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Realistically, many of the insurers ― still recovering from losses they incurred in the Affordable Care Act’s early years and uncertain about the program’s future ― would drop out altogether.

An increasingly vocal chorus of interest groups, including everybody from the American Medical Association to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, have been calling on the president and Congress to address the issue ― ideally, with a permanent solution. One way to do that would be to appropriate the money for the next few years, or maybe indefinitely.

The coming spending bill would be an obvious place to try that, because, unlike most of the bills that go through the House these days, it will probably end up passing with a combination of Democratic and Republican votes ― over the objections of the most conservative members.

Lawmakers wouldn’t even have to find offsetting revenue or spending cuts, because the official budget baseline, from the Congressional Budget Office, anticipates the money (roughly $7 to $8 billion for next year) being spent.

Key House Republicans have already said they would like the money to keep flowing, their objections to Obamacare notwithstanding.

“I will do everything I can to make sure the cost-sharing reduction payments get made, especially this year, where they were promised by the federal government under the contracts,” Rep. Greg Walden (R-Ore.), chairman of the Energy and Commerce Committee, told Bloomberg News last month. “That’s an obligation not only to insurers but also to the people who took on those plans. We cannot leave them high and dry.”

But that was before Trump made his statements about withholding the subsidies ― and it’s not clear what House Republicans will do if Trump decides to oppose the funding strongly.

“We continue to work with the Trump administration to evaluate the options in front of us,” AshLee Strong, spokeswoman for House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.), said on Thursday.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.