The United Incident Wasn't Racism, But The Reaction From Asians Points To A Truth

David Dao being violently dragged off a United Airlines flight was plainly reprehensible. But despite the temptation to neatly attribute the incident to racism, it probably wasn’t an example of “flying while Asian.” (And let’s all agree he is not the “Asian Rosa Parks.”)

United has taken responsibility after it required passengers to de-plane and give their seats to four crew members who needed to board. But the airline said its system for selecting David Dao and the three others is an IT algorithm that takes into account issues like disabilities and connecting flights. This means there’s no real evidence of racial bias.

So why were Asians quick to label the United incident discriminatory? It’s probably because we could conceive of a reality in which this could happen ― and it’s a different reality than that of those who see Asians only as “model minorities.”

It could be that Asians and Asian-Americans assumed Dao was the target of xenophobia, given that anti-Asian hates crimes have been on the rise since President Trump deemed China an economic enemy. Or it could be that Asians assumed he was targeted because of the way Asian men are constantly emasculated and turned into racist punchlines. And it could be that Asians and Asian-Americans assumed Dao was discriminated against for his name, given that Asian names receive fewer job callbacks than Anglo-sounding names

Following the incident, Asians and Asian-Americans cut up their United Airlines cards, sounded off on social media and wrote about how the dragging of David Dao must have been racially motivated.

And Dao himself concluded as much. A passenger told The Washington Post that the doctor from Kentucky said, “I’m being selected because I’m Chinese,” though reports have stated he is both Chinese and Vietnamese.  

That hit Asians and Asian-Americans where it hurts. And the fact that the incident set our community off to the extent that it did speaks volumes. 

The reaction also comes from a complicated place in which many Asians feel the push-and-pull of latent discrimination, and an inability to sound off about it. That’s enough to amount to jumping at the chance to speak out because we typically feel we can’t, or we don’t, or both. 

Asian-American advocacy groups told HuffPost that the outcry among the community over the United Airlines incident indicates that we have strong feelings about discrimination bubbling beneath the surface that we feel we have to suppress.

We’ve seen more and more Asian Americans coalesce around individual cases involving AAPI folks because many of our own unjust experiences have been silenced or shrugged off.

“I think we’ve seen more and more Asian-Americans coalesce around individual cases involving AAPI folks because many of our own unjust experiences have been silenced or shrugged off,” Kham S. Moua, Senior Policy and Communications Manager of OCA – Asian Pacific American Advocates, told HuffPost. 

The reality is that we Asian-Americans will complain about a lot of prosaic things — the sun, perceived price gauging, a freaking dirty floor. But we rarely complain openly about overt racism. So when we do, it’s safe to assume our feelings about it are a big deal.

Each Asian nationality experiences racial discrimination to varying degrees, but it happens to all of us. Historically speaking, a commonly held belief is that the lack of outcry about racism is, in part, a result of mainstream society labeling Asians the “model minority,” and granting us somewhat of a white privilege card following the Chinese Exclusion Act. A hesitancy to speak out might also be attributed to the fact that immigrants are made to feel their survival is dependent on appeasing mainstream society, so they don’t want to complain.

The acquiescent Asian stereotype is becoming increasingly disavowed in the U.S. as a result of Asian-Americans speaking out.

But we live in a different time ― one in which there is greater galvanization of Asian-Americans and identity-specific activism than ever before. The acquiescent Asian stereotype is becoming increasingly disavowed in the U.S. as a result of Asian-Americans speaking out more loudly and in greater numbers.  

So it makes sense that we all might have seen something of ourselves in the Asian man who was expected to be a pushover and then refused to leave his seat — only to suffer a broken nose and missing teeth as a result. 

Tung Nguyen, chair of The Progressive Vietnamese American Organization, explained to HuffPost why he believes that people might have attributed the incident to race-based bullying.  

“Because we have been bullied,” he said. “Asian American kids are frequently bullied — the White House Initiative on AAPIs under President Obama even created a campaign Act to Change to address this.”

He pointed to other examples of Asian discrimination including the “bamboo ceiling” in corporate America, or the disparity in Asian leadership, as well a lack of representation in mainstream media. Nguyen also cited a legacy of institutional anti-Asian racism in the U.S., such as the Chinese Exclusion Act and Japanese internment.

Another reason Asians may have been quick to label the United incident racism is because we rarely feel entitled to do so. And part of that feeling is that other Asians might hold the belief that we don’t experience real discrimination, or that “Asians are basically white,” advocates say.

Why do Asians believe we don’t experience racism? It’s most likely privilege and disparate backgrounds, experts say.

Neither of these assertions is true, of course, but the belief that they are might be attributed to diverse background. Why do Asians believe we don’t experience racism? It’s most likely privilege and disparate backgrounds, with Asians maintaining an even larger wealth gap than whites

Of course, Asians are not homogenous, and a Korean-American with a privileged upbringing would not experience the same discrimination a Chinese-American with an accent might. And a Japanese-American might have a different experience than the Southeast Asian-American population, who have the highest high school dropout rates in the country. 

“Many Asian Americans who are highly acculturated or privileged will say that they have not experienced discrimination,” Nguyen said. “This may be true because they are privileged. Even if a person has never faced discrimination, that doesn’t mean it doesn’t happen to other people. If an Asian American is fortunate enough to have never faced discrimination, I think that person should help those who have.”

Nguyen also pointed to a “If you don’t speak of it, it doesn’t exist” phenomenon.

“Many Asian Americans have experienced racism directly, but have felt uncomfortable talking about it,” he said. “It may also be a psychological trick—pretending that discrimination does not exist may be necessary to give a person the belief that the only thing that matters for success is one’s own merit and hard work. I am old enough that I have seen many Asian Americans change their position on this—as they rise, they begin to see how their background is used against them, subtly or otherwise, and how their own efforts are not enough.”

And in a climate in which anti-Asian hates crimes are on the rise, Nguyen said a positive upshot is that more Asians are speaking out. 

[Dao’s] action and our responses will go a long way toward removing the stereotype that we are docile, and that’s a good thing.”

“Others may not have experienced racism until now, with the current mood and environment since Trump’s election,” he said. “What is new is that many of us are no longer afraid to speak out. We do not know whether Dr. Dao was picked because he was Asian, but if they did because they thought he would go quietly, his action and our responses will go a long way toward removing the stereotype that we are docile, and that’s a good thing.”

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Turkey Is About To Hold A Vote That Could Change The Country Forever

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

Millions of people in Turkey will cast their votes on Sunday in a referendum that could fundamentally change how the country is governed. If passed, the new constitution would give President Recep Tayyip Erdogan sweeping new power over Turkish politics and potentially let him rule for more than a decade to come.

Turks are deeply polarized over the referendum, and many of Erdogan’s political opponents worry about reprisal if they were to speak out against reforms. But despite a fervent campaign from Erdogan and the ruling AK Party to push a “yes” result, polls still show an incredibly tight race days. 

“Against insurmountable odds, complete blanket coverage of the ‘yes’ campaign, there is stiff resistance to this among the Turkish population,” said Aaron Stein, a resident senior fellow at the Atlantic Council think tank.

The proposed new constitution would have wide-ranging effects, such as increasing the number of seats in Parliament, but the greatest change would be the powers granted to the president. Erdogan would become head of the executive and of the state, doing away with the role of prime minister. He could dismiss Parliament, call a state of emergency, appoint ministers and judges ― all without approval from lawmakers. 

The constitutional changes also include a provision that the president would be eligible to hold office for two five-year terms. Turkey has elections scheduled in two years, which could mean that Erdogan would have a chance to be in power until at least 2029. 

Turkey has been mired in turmoil since an attempted coup last year failed to topple Erdogan, and the government continues to crack down on perceived dissent in public and private institutions in its aftermath. There is also a resurgent conflict between Kurdistan Worker’s Party (PKK) militants and the government, which has led to terrorist bombings and harsh reprisals from authorities. 

Erdogan is arguing that an executive presidency through a new constitution will provide the reform that Turkey’s often gridlocked political system needs, as well as bring about more stability. Throughout the campaign, Erdogan has also tried to drum up nationalist support by pushing a narrative that Turkey is taking a stand against other nations seeking to vilify it ― a tactic that included him accusing Dutch and German governments of Nazism during a diplomatic spat last month. 

The political situation in Turkey has changed significantly since the 2016 coup attempt, which Erdogan blames on exiled U.S.-based cleric Fethullah Gulen. In an attempt to remove dissent, Turkish authorities have fired or imprisoned tens of thousands of people, including academics, journalists and members of the armed forces. At least 40,000 teachers alone have been removed from their posts for allegedly supporting Gulen. 

Political opposition parties have also been targeted. The Pro-Kurdish HDP, which won a surprising number of seats in the 2015 elections, has had many of its prominent members arrested on vague charges. 

In past years, a number of opposition parties had backed the idea of constitutional reform to remedy the country’s fractious coalition governments ― but as Erdogan grows more authoritarian and the new constitution focuses so heavily on the presidency, many parties are urging a “no” vote. 

Amid the government’s crackdown, Sunday’s vote has become less a referendum on constitutional reforms and more about Erdogan himself. Even though the president has become increasingly repressive and has moved toward illiberal government, Erdogan still commands huge support. He is no longer counting on a wide range of voters to back his presidency, however. Instead, he relies on a loyal base of conservative supporters and some elements of the far-right. 

“[Erdogan’s] weakness is that he now relies entirely on political polarization for popularity,” Stein said. “It’s no longer consensus-building across different factions in Turkey. It is a very right-wing, nationalist base that supports him.”

If Erdogan fails to rally the support needed to push the “yes” campaign over the top, Turkey is expected to deal with political instability in the fallout. A loss could weaken Erdogan and cause internal challenges against his hold on power ― but the opposition is divided and the president would still control significant influence over all areas of government. It’s possible, too, that the AK Party would attempt to pass the measures through parliament if it gains a majority in future elections.

Although forecasts show a neck-and-neck race going into Sunday’s vote, polling in Turkey historically has been unreliable. Pollsters are having to call as many as three times more people than normal to get the numbers needed for surveys ― respondents are reportedly reticent to openly talk about their votes with someone they don’t know.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Compared To Past Years, Fewer Americans Now Say The GOP Is 'Too Extreme'

Fewer Americans now view the Republican Party as “too extreme” than did so a year ago, according to a new HuffPost/YouGov survey.

Forty-two percent of Americans currently say the GOP is too extreme, down modestly from the 48 percent who said that in a survey last May, and from the 50 percent who held that view two years ago.

Views of the Democrats have changed relatively little over the same time period ― 40 percent now say the party is too extreme, compared to 38 percent last year and 39 percent in 2015.

Asked which of the two parties is more extreme, Americans named the GOP by a 6-point margin, 36 percent to 30 percent, in the latest survey. The remaining respondents said the parties are equally extreme, or that they’re unsure.

Just 19 percent of Democrats see their own party as too extreme, while three-quarters of Democrats view the Republican Party that way. Thirteen percent of Republicans say their own party goes too far, with 80 saying the same of the Democrats.

Partisans on both sides of the aisle are divided over whether their party should be more aggressive in Congress: 30 percent of Democrats say that congressional Democrats compromise too much with Republicans, 19 percent that they compromise too little, and another 33 percent that they’re doing about right. Similarly, 31 percent of Republicans think their party’s congressional representatives compromise too often, 17 percent that they compromise too little, and 31 percent that they’re compromising about as often as they should.

The Democratic Party, which has long enjoyed a far higher favorability rating than the GOP, saw its numbers plunge in the wake of the 2016 election, although it still retains a modest edge. At the beginning of last November, the Democratic Party’s net favorability rating stood at about -4, according to HuffPost Pollster’s aggregate, with the GOP favorability rating closer to -20. As of Thursday afternoon, the Democrats’ numbers had fallen to a net -10, while Republicans had recovered to about -15.

The HuffPost/YouGov poll consisted of 1,000 completed interviews conducted April 6-7 among U.S. adults, using a sample selected from YouGov’s opt-in online panel to match the demographics and other characteristics of the adult U.S. population.

The Huffington Post has teamed up with YouGov to conduct daily opinion polls. You can learn more about this project and take part in YouGov’s nationally representative opinion polling. Data from all HuffPost/YouGov polls can be found here. More details on the polls’ methodology are available here.

Most surveys report a margin of error that represents some, but not all, potential survey errors. YouGov’s reports include a model-based margin of error, which rests on a specific set of statistical assumptions about the selected sample, rather than the standard methodology for random probability sampling. If these assumptions are wrong, the model-based margin of error may also be inaccurate. Click here for a more detailed explanation of the model-based margin of error.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Michigan Capital Abruptly Scraps 'Sanctuary City' Label After Business Leaders Invoke Trump

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

The capital of Michigan will no longer be a sanctuary city, after lawmakers held a special vote to undo the resolution they had passed unanimously last week.  

The Lansing City Council voted 5-2 on Wednesday night to remove the sanctuary city label, which signals support for immigrants, refugees and undocumented residents and indicates that local law enforcement will limit cooperation with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.  

They had voted 6-0 on April 3 to declare Lansing a sanctuary city, citing President Donald Trump’s executive orders targeting undocumented immigrants and “an increasingly hostile anti-immigrant and racist atmosphere [that] is being promoted by a vocal minority that represents neither American values nor the majority of our citizenry.”

The resolution also criticized state and federal government efforts to involve local law enforcement in immigration enforcement “because doing so would irreparably damage the trust between our police officers and our citizens.” Those sentiments were codified into official policy the same day, when Mayor Virg Bernero signed an executive order limiting police and city cooperation with ICE.

But after city and state business leaders wrote the council urging them to strip away the “sanctuary city” reference, lawmakers called a special meeting to take another vote.

The letter from the Lansing Regional Chamber and the Michigan Chamber of Congress warned that the sanctuary designation would make the city a “target.” Trump signed an executive order in January to strip funding from sanctuary cities, and his administration is escalating the pressure on jurisdictions that limit cooperation with federal immigration authorities.

“Recent actions of City Council, whether intended or not, have placed an unnecessary target on the City of Lansing while jeopardizing millions of dollars in federal funding that impacts the city budget,” the business organizations wrote.

Some local residents at Wednesday’s meeting also spoke against the sanctuary city policy.

Others condemned the council after the vote, calling members “spineless” for changing their minds.

Councilwoman Kathie Dunbar, who supports the sanctuary city designation, blasted those colleagues who voted to eliminate it.

“It’s a darn shame that after appearing to have a backbone and actually taking a stand on something that really matters, folks have decided to throw it away,” she said, according to MLive. “And the message that sends to folks is really sad.”

The city will continue to define itself as a “welcoming city” for immigrants and refugees, and the mayor’s new policies to protect those individuals still stand. Some councilmembers argued that Bernero’s order would prove more effective than the sanctuary designation in any case.

“The term ‘sanctuary’ in the resolution has become very problematic and distracting — so distracting in my opinion that it’s taken away from the intent of our resolution, which is to protect individuals,” Councilwoman Judi Brown Clarke said Wednesday, according to The Associated Press.

Although some sanctuary cities have come out fighting against Trump’s threats, at least one other jurisdiction, Florida’s Miami Dade County, has already bowed to the pressure and ordered local law enforcement to fully cooperate with ICE. Lawmakers in more than 30 states, including Michigan, have introduced legislation to block local sanctuary policies.

“Unfortunately, some states and cities have adopted policies designed to frustrate the enforcement of our immigration laws,” U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions said last month. “Such policies cannot continue. They make our nation less safe by putting dangerous criminals back on our streets.”

Advocates of sanctuary city policies believe they keep communities safer, by not diverting local law enforcement resources and by helping undocumented individuals feel comfortable cooperating with police. They also argue that Trump’s order to strip funding is unconstitutional and they’re fighting it in court.

type=type=RelatedArticlesblockTitle=Related Stories + articlesList=58dbdef8e4b01ca7b429112c,58daabb4e4b0d41721b9d600,5890d263e4b0c90eff007b6a

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Cadillac's CT6 Plug-In hybrid goes on sale in the US

General Motors’ Cadillac division starts sales this month of its $75,000 Cadillac CT6 plug-in hybrid. General Motors has started US sales of the Cadillac CT6 Plug-In after taking its first domestic deliveries of the China-produced sedan last month. T…

The FCC just sold a chunk of the wireless spectrum to T-Mobile

The results are in. After a year-long process, the Federal Communications Commission today announced the conclusion of its first-ever broadcast incentive auction, naming T-Mobile, Dish, Comcast and US Cellular as the biggest winners.

This $12 Desk Stand Holds Your Phone With the Power of Magnets

You probably already own a magnetic smartphone car mount, and thus have a magnetic plate behind your phone at all times. Now, Bestek’s magnetic desk mount lets you put it to use even when you aren’t in the car.

Read more…

Apple Is Buying All the Good Trees for Its New Campus, and the Tree People Are Fighting Back

A tough truth about Apple is making headlines this week, and you’d better hold on to your butts, because it is salacious. Apparently, Apple is snatching up all the very best trees for its new campus, leaving local tree purchasers scrambling for solutions.

Read more…

Star Wars Battlefront 2 leak reveals Darth Maul and Yoda

Star Wars Battlefront 2 will be officially unveiled on April 15, but the trailer has leaked early, and it reveals a bunch of details about the game. As expected, the original trailer leak has already been pulled, but not before hundreds of copies were uploaded to YouTube in its place. After looking through it a few times, some details become … Continue reading

SlashGear’s Best of the 2017 New York Auto Show

The 2017 New York Auto Show saw its fair share of intriguing new car and truck debuts, but as always there are a handful that stand out from the pack. We spent two days scouring the halls of the Javits Center to bring you our best of show wrap-up and show you the vehicles that got us the most exciting … Continue reading