Trump And Sessions Could Ruin Conservatives' Plans To Fix The War On Drugs

WASHINGTON ― For years, conservatives like Charles Koch and Newt Gingrich have joined progressives in urging Congress to reform inflexible sentencing laws that mandate lengthy prison terms for particular crimes. Critics say these laws, a relic of the failed war on the drugs, are unnecessary, costly and inhumane.

But Jeff Sessions did not fully get on board with reform when he was a prosecutor or when he was a senator. And now that he’s U.S. Attorney General, Sessions could require federal prosecutors to seek the most serious charge in every case ― which may trigger lengthy mandatory minimum sentences for low-level defendants.

The Obama administration’s Justice Department elected to no longer pursue mandatory minimums for certain low-level drug offenders, and it touted in 2015 that federal drug prosecutors were moving away from seeking minimums “at record rates.” Those changes contributed to a drop in the federal prison population for the first time in decades at a time when the system was facing an overcrowding crisis.

However, Sessions is expected to go in a different direction. He’s tapped Steven Cook, a prosecutor who says the federal criminal justice system is working just fine, for a key role in Sessions’ new Task Force on Crime Reduction and Public Safety, which will re-evaluate the federal government’s response to crime.

As The Washington Post reports, Cook previously headed the National Association of Assistant U.S. Attorneys, a group that opposed Obama administration efforts to implement sentencing reforms. Sessions and Cook could re-emphasize the deployment of the across-the-board sentences Congress established for certain federal crimes, rather than allow prosecutors more discretion in charging decisions.

Mandatory minimums are controversial because they amount to a one-size-fits-all approach to punishment — which exacerbates racial disparities in sentencing. And they don’t allow judges to take individual circumstances into account. A 46-year-old man who allegedly sold $1,800 worth of painkillers to an informant, for example, faced a minimum 25-year prison sentence under Florida law in 2013. A 17-year-old who sold crack was sentenced to life in federal prison until his sentence was commuted by Obama (He now works as a school counselor).

Critics blame these laws for ballooning prison populations and for costs to taxpayers. This includes a growing number of Republicans. Conservative Sens. Mike Lee (R-Utah), Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), John Cornyn (R-Texas) and Rand Paul (R-Ky.) have all supported legislation that would reform mandatory minimum sentences. The American Legislative Exchange Council, a conservative nonprofit, also has a model policy for states that gives judges discretion to depart from these sentences for certain nonviolent offenders.   

“Sessions is grossly out of step with the rest of the party,” said Jessica Jackson Sloan, a human rights attorney who oversees #cut50, a bipartisan initiative to reduce mass incarceration. “It’s very alarming to us to suddenly see that Sessions … is actually in favor of mandatory minimums and pushing for them so hard,” she added.

The attorney general came up as a federal prosecutor in Alabama during the 1980s, a time when the government was starting to take an aggressive approach to drug sentencing. The federal prison population subsequently ballooned from 24,640 inmates in 1980 to 219,298 by 2013. Sessions has pointed to this experience as influencing his views.  

“When mandatory minimums are either eliminated or reduced substantially, it reduces the ability of law officers to negotiate and protect the public,” Sessions said at a Senate hearing in 2015. “I’ve been there, I’ve prosecuted cases.”  

The DOJ declined to comment on Sessions’ plans for mandatory minimums, but he is known as a criminal justice hardliner: As Alabama attorney general, he called chain gangs “constitutional and proper.” While he backed legislation that lowered, but did not eliminate, the sentencing gap between crack and powder cocaine (which resulted in severe racial disparities), Sessions has largely opposed broader sentencing reforms.

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

It’s clear that President Donald Trump and Sessions are on the same page when it comes to pushing tough-on-crime policies. “If any other Republican presidential candidate won, you’d be looking at a different department,” said Kevin Ring, president of of Families Against Mandatory Minimums.

Ring is a former GOP aide on Capitol Hill who was convicted in connection with the Jack Abramoff influence-peddling scandal scandal and was sentenced to 20 months in prison. (Federal prosecutors had asked for much longer). He noted that some reform advocates on the right had been taking a wait-and-see approach to the Trump administration, with several hoping that the president would be “malleable” on criminal justice issues. But that’s beginning to shift, he said.

“I think people are going through the stages of grief,” Ring said. “Everyone has been so excited about playing offense, trying to pass reform at the federal and state level, that the idea that we’re going to spend four years playing defense has made people want to focus more on state work because that’s where you can actually effect some positive change.”

The DOJ declined to comment on Sessions’ plans for mandatory minimums.

Right on Crime, a conservative criminal justice group, is “definitely not throwing in the towel on federal reform,” said crime policy director Marc Levin. The group and other organizations recently wrote a letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee requesting that U.S. Attorney nominees answer questions about their views on key criminal justice issues, Levin said.

He noted they’ve had some “good discussions with some folks at the White House,” and claimed that criminal justice reform has support from Trump associates including the president’s son-in-law and senior adviser, Jared Kushner. The White House did not respond to a request for comment.

The Huffington Post reached out to several other prominent conservatives who have advocated for criminal justice reform about Sessions’ views. The offices of Sens. Cornyn, Paul and Lee did not respond to a request for comment. Mark Holden, general counsel for Koch Industries, declined to comment. Spokespeople for Gingrich and Grover Norquist — who last month advocated in support of ending mandatory minimums in Nebraska — also did not respond to requests for comment.

Jackson Sloan, the human rights attorney, said it “probably makes more sense for conservatives to work behind the scenes, rather than attacking a leader in their own party’s administration outright.” But at some point, she added, “it becomes obvious that they’re on different sides of the fence.”

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Maryland Lawmakers Approve Bill To Fight Drug Price-Gouging

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

Maryland lawmakers have passed a first-in-the-nation measure that lets the state attorney general sue generic drug makers that sharply raise prices in a move aimed at fighting what legislators call “price-gouging.”

The bill overwhelmingly was approved by the Democratic-controlled legislature on Monday and hailed by Maryland Attorney General Brian Frosh as a way to check sharply higher prices for crucial generic drugs.

The Maryland measure comes as concerns about rising U.S. drug costs have been building for years. For example the 2015 decision by Turing Pharmaceuticals to increase the cost of a life-saving, anti-infection drug by 5,000 percent sparked widespread outrage.

The legislation takes aim at a generic drug market that makes up 88 percent of U.S. pharmaceutical sales and totaled $75 billion in 2015, according to Frosh’s office.

“The market seems to bear it and so some of these manufacturers are charging as much as they possibly can,” Frosh said in a telephone interview on Tuesday.

Governor Larry Hogan, a Republican, has not said whether he would sign the legislation. His representatives did not respond to requests for comment.

The bill allows Maryland’s state authority on Medicaid, a federal healthcare program for the poor, to let the attorney general’s office know when it sees patients being charged an “unconscionable increase” for essential generic drugs.

The attorney general could then seek an explanation from the manufacturer and sue to protect consumers, with a fine of up to $10,000 for each violation. A judge could order the company to reverse its price increase.

Generics are pharmaceuticals that are equivalent to a brand-name drug. They usually are available after patent protections for the original maker run out.

The bill did not touch on branded prescription drugs new to the market since their manufacturers have development and patent costs they are entitled to recoup, Frosh said.

Maryland is the first state to pass a measure to combat excessive price increases, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. Massachusetts, New York, Rhode Island and Tennessee have similar legislation pending, the conference said.

The legislation would have a “chilling effect” on the generic market in Maryland, said Chester Davis Jr., president of the Association for Accessible Medicines, which represents generic drug makers.

Use of generic drugs had saved Maryland $3.7 billion in 2015, he said.

“To focus on the side of the ecosystem that is actually driving the savings and not the costs definitely seems counterintuitive to us,” he said.

 

(Reporting by Ian Simpson; Editing by Daniel Trotta and Lisa Shumaker)

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Scary Revelation About New 'It' Movie Will Chill You To The Bone

The news about the remake of “It,” Stephen King’s terrifying book and miniseries, was bad enough. Then, the teaser trailer came out to haunt our dreams. Now, some brave souls have noticed a strange coincidence between the original version and the reboot, and “it” will blow your mind.

We are not clowning around here. If you don’t want to be freaked out, you should stop reading now.

Redditors recently noted the “coincidence,” and it just might chill you to the bone. Are you ready for this? 

O.M.G.

Twitter was all over it:

In “It,” we learn that monster-clown Pennywise wakes up to terrorize Derry, Maine, roughly every 27 to 30 years. As Twitter and Reddit note, the new movie will be out 27 years after the original miniseries was released in 1990. The book was released in 1986, so the remake is around 30 years after that, too.

Is this some clever marketing scheme? Did it just happen by chance? Or is it something more sinister? Is Pennywise … real? 

The Huffington Post reached out to Warner Bros. to find out the answer.

Until then … hold me … so I don’t float away. 

The “It” remake is out in September.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

This Queer Chef Boldly Refused To Be Featured By Ivanka Trump's Brand

Despite Ivanka Trump’s attempts to cut ties with her brand, some people still don’t want to be associated with the name “Trump.” Chef Angela Dimayuga is one of those people.

In a recent Instagram post, Dimayuga (who is the executive chef of Mission Chinese Food), says she was approached by a freelance writer for IvankaTrump.com about an interview.

“I would love to conduct an interview (via telephone/email) with you spotlighting your work as a strong female entrepreneur,” freelancer Adi Heyman wrote, adding that the website was “a non-political platform of empowerment for modern working women.” 

The attempt to flatter Dimayuga didn’t work. In an interview with The Huffington Post, the chef said she saw the message mid-service. She chose not to write back right away, instead collaborating on a response with her friend, activist Shakirah Simley, and eloquently explained just why she wouldn’t grant an interview to the “non-political platform.” 

Below is her response in its entirety: 

Hi Adi, 

Thank you for thinking of me. I’m glad you are a fan of my work so much that you want to provide more visibility for my career to inspire “other working women.” However, I’m for women who actually empower other women. 

I don’t believe that IvankaTrump.com is truly “a non-political platform of empowerment for [women]”. So long as the name Trump is involved, it is political and frankly, an option for the IvankaTrump.com business to make a profit. 

I don’t see anything empowering about defunding Planned Parenthood, barring asylum from women refugees, rolling back safeguards for equal pay, and treating POC/LGBT and the communities that support these groups like second class citizens.

As a queer person of color and daughter of immigrant parents I am not interested in being profiled as an aspirational figure for those that support a brand and a President that slyly disparages female empowerment. Sharing my story with a brand and family that silences our same voices is futile. 

Thank you for the consideration. 

Dimayuga told HuffPost about her decision to publish her response publicly, in order to show solidarity with others who are like her. 

“It’s important for me to acknowledge the intersectional community in which I’ve been able to creatively thrive in,” the chef said. And as a woman in the male-dominated restaurant business, Dimayuga says she learned to speak up. 

“I learned that only 6 percent of executive positions in kitchens are held by women. I am also queer, and have immigrant parents,” Dimayuga wrote. “I’ve come to the understanding that people want to hear what I have to say from my unique point of view. It’s a responsibility that gives me purpose, so making clear and pointed decisions on what I involve my time with is important.” 

Dimayuga said the response to her post has been “unanimously positive.” Even celebrity chef Anthony Bourdain commented on her Instagram, calling Dimayuga “My hero!”

”The sheer number of people that have been supportive just shows that there is a stronger and bigger community than I see on the day-to-day that are willing to actually help, protect, support women and those in marginalized communities,” Dimayuga said. 

She added, “I’m not interested in a catfight―I just found an opportunity to speak and share my narrative and my truth to vocalize my values and my own integrity. For me, it was an opportunity to say I belonged to a community where I hope to enrich the different spheres I live in and to cultivate empowering environments that are safe for us.” 

As of press time, the chef told HuffPost the freelancer has not reached back out to her. She has, however, gained an interesting new follower on her account: Ivanka Trump. 

Ivanka Trump’s personal Instagram confirms the recent follow: 

The HuffPost Lifestyle newsletter will make you happier and healthier, one email at a time. Sign up here.

type=type=RelatedArticlesblockTitle=Related… + articlesList=58ecdfdfe4b0df7e20456221,58818516e4b070d8cad1c050,589b4c41e4b09bd304bf2c7b

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Shannon Purser Opens Up About Coming To Understand Her Sexuality

Shannon Purser, the actress behind beloved character Barb from “Stranger Things,” used Twitter on Tuesday to get candid about her sexuality and her personal journey to authenticity. 

She explained to her followers that, for her, becoming comfortable with her sexuality was “a process,” and offered some words of comfort for anyone that may be experiencing a similar path of self-exploration.

Purser also offered words of support to her followers in the form of mutual prayers.

Purser’s lovable character Barb became a cult sensation after the airing of “Stranger Things” on Netflix last summer. The actress previously opened up about the queer appeal of Barb as a character, telling Paper last July,

“We all at some point in our lives have felt that we weren’t at the top of our social circle, or that maybe we needed our friends more than they needed us, and feeling overlooked. I think a lot more people feel a little bit insecure and a little bit hungry for love and acceptance.”

The second season of “Stranger Things” is slated for premiere on Halloween.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

The Aftermath Of An Alleged Chemical Weapon Attack In Idlib

Dr. Abdel Hay Tennari, who treated at least 22 critical victims from the alleged toxic gas attack in Khan Sheikhoun, said his patients’ symptoms were consistent with Sarin gas and the field hospital where he works has run out of the antidote.

AS WORLD LEADERS issued statements of outrage over the alleged chemical attack early Tuesday morning in the southeastern Syrian province of Idlib that killed dozens of civilians, Dr. Abdel Hay Tennari was rushing to treat the victims arriving at the Sarmin Field Hospital.

Speaking to Syria Deeply by phone, he said that the 22 critical patients he had treated so far all exhibited signs of exposure to a nerve agent. Their symptoms – foaming at the mouth and fluid filling the lungs, which can lead to suffocation – were consistent with the effects of Sarin gas, he said. At least 74 people died in the alleged chemical attack, according to a document detailing the victims’ names, released by the Idlib Health Directorate.

World leaders accused Syrian president Bashar al-Assad’s government of carrying out the attack. However, Damascus issued a statement categorically denying that it used any form of poisonous gas in Khan Sheikhoun.

Tennari, an internal medicine specialist undertaking his residency on respiratory diseases at a field hospital supported by the Syrian-American Medical Society in Idlib, said many of his patients reported seeing a government airplane drop a rocket on the area just prior to feeling symptoms. Additionally, at least three government airstrikes reportedly targeted and destroyed the National Hospital in Marrat al-Numan on Sunday. Just 15 miles (25km) away from Khan Sheikhoun, this hospital “would have been used to treat and save a large number of the patients,” Tennari said.

Russia claimed that the Syrian warplanes targeted rebel “workshops, which produced chemical warfare munitions” east of Khan Sheikhoun, according to a statement from its defence ministry. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Moscow would present evidence proving this claim to the United Nations Security Council, which convened for an emergency meeting on Wednesday.

Members of the U.N. Security Council are expected to vote on a resolution condemning the alleged chemical attack and ordering the Syrian government to release information regarding their air operations in Syria, according to the New York Times. If confirmed, Tuesday’s incident in Khan Sheikhoun would be the deadliest chemical attack since 2013, when Syrian government forces allegedly used Sarin gas in Eastern Ghouta, killing hundreds of people.

Syria Deeply spoke with Dr. Tennari about the situation in Khan Sheikhoun and how the hospital is coping with the influx of victims from the alleged chemical attack.

Syria Deeply: What did your patients tell you about the incident?

Dr. Abdel Hay Tennari: They told me that there was an attack from an airplane and they saw a rocket that was released from the airplane. Soon after, they started having problems breathing and they felt weakness in their bodies. So many people died from the attack [in Khan Sheikhoun] and many who arrived at hospitals were already dead.

We received 22 patients where I practice at Sarmin Field Hospital, and many of these people arrived with severe injuries. We know that other hospitals closer to the attack have received many more patients, many of them children and elderly people. Many parents have been separated from their children following the attack and families are looking for their children everywhere. They are going from hospital to hospital trying to find their children. I saw one baby; he was so tiny, and he was alone. We have no idea who his parents are and because he is so small we can’t ask him.

There are hundreds of victims, and so far we can confirm that 65 people have died. The more [critical] patients [that I have treated] are those who had inhaled high amounts of the toxin.

Syria Deeply: Assad’s government has denied that their military used chemical weapons in Khan Sheikhoun. Do you believe this to be true?

Tennari: Patients have said that the attack came from a regime airplane; the regime also used chemical agents before when they attacked Eastern Ghouta near Damascus four years ago. Also, 36 hours before the chemical attack, the regime launched three airstrikes on Marrat al-Numan Hospital, completely destroying the hospital. Marrat al-Numan is a large central hospital which is 25km from the site of the attack. This hospital would have been used to treat and save a large number of the patients [from Khan Sheikhoun]. We believe that the regime has purposely attacked this hospital [to cause maximum casualties]. They have done this before by attacking other hospitals in Idlib and throughout Syria.

Syria Deeply: Were you able to tell what type of toxin your patients inhaled?

Tennari: The chemical agent is Sarin. We feel that [the regime used] Sarin because of two main things. First, the symptoms exhibited by the patients are consistent with the use of Sarin. This includes: shortness of breath, huge amount of excessive secretion from the mouth and lungs with induced dyspnea [breathing difficulties], and constricted pupils. Hundreds of people [from the same attack] have displayed these same symptoms.

Second, the patients I have treated have recovered after being given Pralidoxime, which is an antidote to Sarin. Those who were given the Sarin antidote became stable in about an hour. The fact that patients responded so quickly to the antidote makes us believe that the regime used the chemical agent Sarin.

Syria Deeply: There have been rumors circulating that families are being told that a person who otherwise appears to have died from the effects of the chemical could be revived within 48 hours. Do you have a response to this?

Tennari: There are rumors that are being widely spread through social media channels like WhatsApp, Telegram messenger and Facebook that, during the attack on Ghouta four years ago, some victims came back [to life]. My guess is that those [victims] were not seen by doctors or checked with the correct machine to see if there was cardiac activity [prior to being confirmed dead]. But this is a rumor. A patient who is dead, or a severe [patient] who has not received treatment will not survive. But people hear rumors and they rush to believe it.

Syria Deeply: Is Pralidoxime being used to treat all patients exposed to the chemical agent?

Tennari: Unfortunately, we have a shortage of the antidote, so only the most severe patients received it. We have [now] referred the difficult cases to Turkey, because they have the antidote there. But even this is risky because it takes two or three hours to get to Turkey and many patients will lose their lives on the way.

As a doctor, I am afraid because now we don’t have the antidote anymore. If the regime uses Sarin again, we won’t be able to treat and save people.

This article originally appeared on Syria Deeply. For weekly updates about the war in Syria, you can sign up to the Syria Deeply email list.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Sorry, But You Can't 'Just Be Friends With An Ex.' Here's Why.

It’s a standard line delivered after a breakup: “Can we still be friends?” 

Sometimes the question is just a courtesy, a toss-away line thrown out to lessen the blow of the breakup. Other times though, we really mean it; we want to keep the non-romantic side of the relationship alive because we still deeply care about the other person. 

It’s a noble endeavor, but as British philosopher Alain de Botton points out in a new illustrated School of Life video, it rarely works out. (It sure doesn’t pan out for the adorable little Pixar-esque monsters in the video.)

“We are deeply attached to the idea that we’re not monsters and as we know, nice people always try to be friends with their exes,” de Botton explains.

More often than not, though, a post-breakup friendship is a setup for further heartbreak, especially for the dumpee. 

“The step from lover to friend is an eternally humiliating demotion,” de Botton explains. “Every sighting of the ex is guaranteed to reignite hope, and then, further insult. One isn’t acquiring a friend, more an unwitting torturer.” 

Well shoot, when you put it that way, de Botton. 

Watch the clip above for more on why we pine for friendships with our exes, and what de Botton says we should aim for instead post-split: civil distance.

type=type=RelatedArticlesblockTitle=Related Stories + articlesList=589116fee4b02772c4ea1692,58e1ef0ae4b0ca889ba1a7ae,57476c66e4b0dacf7ad478b2,56aa7e07e4b0d82286d5570d

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Hunter Hayes Believes 'If You Got A Microphone, You Got A Responsibility'

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

Hunter Hayes recently returned from a long run in Europe, where he performed for military troops in the U.K., Germany, Spain and Italy. The “Invisible” singer was humbled by the opportunity, and wants to do everything he can to shed light on their “heavy” experiences. 

Being a public figure, the 25-year-old feels he has the platform to spread awareness, which is why he takes the time to help our servicemen and -women in any way he can. 

“My thing is if you got a microphone, you got a responsibility,” he told The Huffington Post during a Build Series interview Tuesday. “It’s not saying that everybody’s got to say the same thing, but I just really connect with the people who spread love, who lift, who encourage, who strengthen. And, to me, [veteran] stories strengthen. [They] lift people up, [they] inspire.” 

Hayes, who recently released a new video for “Yesterday’s Song” and plans to debut more music soon, is partnering with Heartgard Plus and Warrior Canine Connection for the Heartgardians program to make sure dog-assisted therapy is available for all service members and veterans who may need it.

“I want to positively affect any man or woman serving our country,” Hayes said. “It’s incredible, the strength that they have, and the stories are just so inspirational.”

Aside from this passion project, Hayes has been in the studio working on a new album, which will showcase a more “moody, intense” vibe. Although many know him for his happy tunes and high-pitched tone, Hayes says his voice has changed since he debuted his first record when he was 19. 

“This voice that I had when I was 16 and then 19 and then 20, it got harder at 21, and then 22, I was like, ‘Oh, my God, what am I doing?’” he said. “It got so hard that I had to embrace where my new voice is and also learn, musically, to kind of embrace space.” 

Hayes assured fans that the album is coming and to just to patient. 

“I’m having to hold back the reins on telling you all the details,” he told HuffPost. “But we’re so almost done!” 

Watch the full Build Series interview with Hunter Hayes below: 

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_2’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

From April 3 to June 30, the HEARTGARD Plus “Heartgardians” program offers consumers nationwide the opportunity to nominate a deserving U.S. Service Member or Veteran to win an all-expense-paid trip to Nashville and a year’s supply of HEARTGARD Plus for their dog. Veterans can be nominated on heartgardians.com or via Twitter or Instagram by using the hashtags #NominateAVeteran and #Sweepstakes. For every nomination, the HEARTGARD Plus team will donate $10 to Warrior Canine Connection. The HEARTGARD Plus team will contribute up to $100,000 to Warrior Canine Connection in 2017.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Google Home can track flight prices for you

The big knock against Google Home when it launched was simply that it didn’t do as much as Amazon’s Echo. But Google has been busy adding more features to Home and generally trying to make the speaker even smarter. Today’s addition is one for travele…

Project Scorpio's generous specs let game makers go wild

Microsoft’s Project Scorpio console promises to be seriously powerful compared to the Xbox One, but what good is all that power if your games don’t take advantage of it? You might not have to worry too much. The company has dished out details on its…