United CEO Apologizes For Flight Fiasco, Promises To 'Fix What's Broken'

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

WASHINGTON — The CEO of United Airlines apologized again Tuesday for the company’s handling of a confrontation that ended with a man being forcibly dragged off a flight, promising to make things right. 

In a statement to company employees, which was posted to United’s Twitter account, Oscar Munoz described Sunday’s incident in Chicago as “truly horrific.”

“Like you, I continue to be disturbed by what happened on this flight and I deeply apologize to the customer forcibly removed and to all the customers aboard,” Munoz wrote. “No one should ever be mistreated this way.”

Munoz added that United takes “full responsibility” and would work to make things right. 

The apology — Munoz’s second in as many days — responds to public outrage over viral videos showing Chicago airport security officers violently dragging a man offUnited flight to Louisville. The airline drew additional criticism after Munoz said in a Monday email to employees that the passenger was acting “disruptive and belligerent” and airline agents had been “left with no choice” except to call security. 

Munoz said Tuesday that the company would conduct a thorough review of its policies and communicate the results to the public by the end of the month.  

“It’s never too late to do the right thing,” he said. “I have committed to our customers and our employees that we are going to fix what’s broken so this never happens again.”

“I promise you we will do better,” he added.

Initially, United said the flight had been overbooked. However, in an interview Tuesday with USA Today, a company spokesman walked back that statement, saying four passengers had to be removed to make room for crew members needed the following day in Louisville. 

Read Munoz’s full statement here.  

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Chemical Weapons Almost Certainly Killed Jewish Refugees The U.S. Could Have Taken In

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

White House press secretary Sean Spicer on Tuesday suggested that as bad as Adolf Hitler was, at least he never used chemical weapons, unlike Syrian President Bashar Assad. It was a strange and unfortunate comparison, not least because a) Hitler definitely did use chemical weapons in the Nazis’ notorious gas chambers, and b) some number of Jewish refugees almost certainly died in those chambers during World War II after being turned away by the United States ― much the same way the U.S. is turning its back on Syrian refugees today.

“You had someone as despicable as Hitler who didn’t even sink to using chemical weapons,” Spicer said Tuesday during the White House daily press briefing, while discussing yet another chemical attack on Syrian civilians last week. That attack killed almost 100 people and injured 400.

The German dictator did, in fact, use gas chambers to exterminate millions of Jews and other people during the Holocaust. Thousands of them might have found refuge in the United States, had President Franklin Roosevelt’s administration not deemed them a threat to national security.

In 1939, almost 1,000 refugees, nearly all of them Jewish, were literally denied entry to the U.S. when they approached Miami aboard a German ship called the St. Louis. More than 200 of them later died in the Holocaust. Meanwhile, a bill that would have allowed the U.S. to take in 20,000 Jewish refugee children never made it through Congress. It wasn’t until after the Holocaust ended that the U.S. started to view the assistance of Jewish refugees as a moral obligation.

The decision to shoo away Jewish and Syrian refugees alike stems from the “America first” mentality. It was a slogan drummed up to oppose U.S. entry to World War II, created by the leading anti-Semites of the time. President Donald Trump’s electoral campaign revived it, using it to summarize his aim of putting the interests of Americans before those of anyone else.

Trump has perpetuated poisonous rhetoric about Syrian refugees ― the very people whose plight he said just last week moved him to strike a Syrian air base. 

After calling for a Muslim ban during his campaign, Trump and his administration have twice attempted to prevent Syrian refugees from seeking safe haven in the United States. Both travel bans have been partially overturned in federal court, and refugee resettlement has resumed, at least for the moment.

But thousands who are still in danger may have to wait months or years before the U.S. accepts their applications.

The United States has historically been the No. 1 resettlement country in the world. But legal resettlement accounts for only a tiny fraction of the total number of refugees worldwide, which is higher than it’s been at any time since World War II. About 65 million people are displaced today, 21 million of whom are refugees living in foreign countries, according to the United Nations. 

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Violent Misogyny Strikes Every Day, Just Read The News

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

My high school had a strict uniform. White blouse under a navy blue tunic, blue socks, black shoes. A striped tie in winter. A mandatory hair ribbon — blue for the younger girls, white for the older ones — and a badge that indicated what house you were in. I wore it almost every day for 6 years. Ankle socks in the summertime, knee socks in the wintertime.

In late March, news broke that my old school was embroiled in a nightmare scenario: a 15-year-old student allegedly raped by a student from her “brother school,” the all-boys school up the road. She was passed out when the alleged assault occurred, and another boy filmed it on his phone. Sydney’s Daily Telegraph reported that the video was passed around on a private Facebook group, and that the alleged victim didn’t know what had been done to her until someone told her about the video via text.

In a letter to parents, the principal of the girls school called the alleged rape “abhorrent,” and called sexual assault “a gross violation of a person’s dignity and personhood.” She lamented the misogyny that women encounter “daily,” and reminded parents that sexual assault is “not a story of alcohol consumption or revealing fashions,” but “a story of violence and crime.” She urged parents to take seriously the issues of consent education and digital literacy, and to teach their children about the effects of alcohol.

“It is vital,” she wrote, “that we engage these topics and issues and not shy away from uncomfortable realities and hard conversations.”

A rape on Sunday, a murder on Monday. What’ll it be today? We know it’s coming, a when and not an if.

The news of the assault reached me a few days after the letter was published, on a Sunday evening. I was tidying my apartment and setting out my clothes for the next day, a habit I picked up in high school.

I sat on my couch thinking about that 15-year-old girl, a girl who gets up every day and puts on the very the same uniform I did. I thought about how she could have been any of my friends. She probably was; even in a small class like ours, statistics suggest that a good number of us were sexually assaulted during adolescence. It could have been me.

That was Sunday night, though it was already Monday in Sydney. I went to bed, and I got up in the morning. Showered, dressed, walked out into the world.

On Monday in America, yet another man walked into another school and shot more people. He shot his estranged wife, a Special Education teacher, and two of her students, then himself. She died, as did one of the children.

It doesn’t take much experience observing these sorts of incidents to know that when the initial reports read “murder-suicide,” the murderer may well turn out to be a man, and the victim his girlfriend or ex-girlfriend or wife or ex-wife. So it was this time.

This man had a record of weapons charges and domestic violence. He married Karen Elaine Smith in January, but her mother said she decided to leave him after only a month. This is how so many mass shootings begin, something that links so many acts of public violence across age, race, and location: the shooters are often men with a history of private rage, taken out first on women.

In fact, if a mass shooting is defined as one with four or more victims, most mass shootings happen at home

It doesn’t take much experience observing these sorts of incidents to know that when the initial reports read “murder-suicide,” the murderer may well turn out to be a man, and the victim his girlfriend or ex-girlfriend or wife or ex-wife.

I sat on my couch, thinking about how a woman and a child were dead because of how our culture teaches men to think about women: as things, as theirs, as threats to their own masculinity and identity when they do not comply and obey. A woman and a child were dead because we don’t take domestic violence seriously enough to stop it before it spills out of the house and into our streets and schools and health care clinics.

That was Monday night, though it was already Tuesday in Sydney. I went to bed, and I got up in the morning. Showered, dressed, walked out into the world.

When feminists talk about the daily grind of misogyny, this is what we talk about. It is relentless, even for those of us who don’t spend our days paying careful attention to headlines or waist-deep in breaking bad news. It’s the catcalls, the interruptions, the down-up glances as we walk to work and try to work. It’s the knowledge of how many rapes and shootings don’t make the papers because the victim didn’t go to a fancy school or the shooter didn’t also hit nearby children. It’s the thousands of women whose lights are dimmed or snuffed out entirely, day after day after day. It’s the knowledge that it could have been our mothers, our sisters, our friends, our teachers. It could have been us. It could have been a 15-year-old girl who wore the same uniform.

A rape on Sunday, a murder on Monday. What’ll it be today? We know it’s coming, a when and not an if. It is relentless. It is exhausting. So I went to bed, exhausted, but shaking with rage and flooded with sadness. And, like millions of other women, I got up in the morning. Showered, dressed, and walked out into the world to do it all again.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Ivanka Trump's Clothing Sales Increased In 2016

Perhaps Ivanka Trump didn’t need that glowing endorsement from Kellyanne Conway to help boost profits.  

Trump’s businesses are mentioned virtually every time she is, and those mentions came fast and furious over the past year she helped her father become president. There were also headlines over boycotts of Trump products, stores that dropped her lines, accusations of copying designs, retweets from the official White House Twitter account and the hypocrisy of importing goods made in China as her father insisted he’d rebuild the country with American labor

It all combined for a hefty increase in sales in 2016. 

G-III Apparel Group, Ltd., which licenses Trump’s clothing collection (her shoe line is licensed through Marc Fisher), reported a “$17.9 million increase in net sales of Ivanka Trump licensed products” for the year ending January 31. The company credits the brand with helping bring up its gross profits as a whole, according to a new annual report released April 3.  

There were observed drops in sales over the period ― at Nordstrom, for example ― and while sales of G-III-licensed merchandise continued to increase, they did so at a significantly slower pace. Forbes reported the brand did $100 million in revenue with G-III during the 2015 fiscal year, when it saw net sales increase by $24.9 million over 2014. 

Trump’s brand declined to comment, and G-III did not return a request for comment by the time of publication. A spokesperson did tell Refinery 29 off-record Monday that “while Ivanka Trump might have been one of its faster growing brands last year, it is not one of the larger brands that the company operates.” The Calvin Klein label, for example, saw twice as much growth for G-III, garnering an increase in sales of $43.7 million.

The news adds fuel to the fire engulfing the Trump family’s numerous conflicts of interest. While Trump announced she was stepping down from her company in January and prohibited the brand from using her likeness in March, she still receives financial reports and profits from the company, even after becoming an official White House employee. An ethics expert told The Huffington Post last month that the only way Trump can truly avoid a conflict of interest is to sell the company or decline a job in the White House. 

The only things that seem certain is that Trump’s brand, like her position in the White House, will continue to be a point of contention during her father’s presidency ― and that any publicity really is good publicity.  

type=type=RelatedArticlesblockTitle=Related… + articlesList=58ecdfdfe4b0df7e20456221,58818516e4b070d8cad1c050,589b4c41e4b09bd304bf2c7b

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Even Airlines With No-Overbooking Policies Can Boot You From Flights

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

It’s not easy to insulate yourself from being booted to another flight.

A man was dragged off a flight on Sunday night because United needed to free up a seat. A video of the incident went viral the next day, and shows that airlines don’t really have to give you the service that you paid for.

Technically, United’s fiasco wasn’t even an issue of overbooking ― flight staff members needed to be able to sit. Still, thousands of customers lose their seats to overbooking every year, according to consumer reports.

Some, known as “voluntary” customers, take a deal with an airline and give up their seat in return for flight vouchers or cash. But others, known as “involuntary” customers, are simply kicked off the plane.

“But hey,” you might ask yourself, “why not just pick an airline that has a policy against overbooking in the first place?”

You’re clever to ask that, reader ― just not clever enough. There are numerous ways to lower your chances of being bumped to another flight, but even airlines with policies against overselling end up rescheduling a few customers.

JetBlue, for example, doesn’t overbook flights.

“JetBlue has a longstanding customer-friendly policy to not oversell flights and we remain committed to that policy,” spokeswoman Danielle Sanders told The Huffington Post on Tuesday.

You’d think such a policy would translate to fewer customers being asked to change their travel plans.

But according to the most recent Air Travel Consumer Report ― a monthly quality-control document released by the Department of Transportation ― JetBlue denies boarding to involuntary customers more than most other airlines. It denied boarding to 1,036 involuntary customers, out of a total 8.7 million customers, between October and December of 2016. That’s more than one customer for every 10,000.

That may not sound like a lot, but that number puts JetBlue near the bottom of the pack. Ten other airlines had better numbers in denying involuntary passengers, and the only airline with worse numbers was ExpressJet.

To be fair, that number fluctuated wildly for JetBlue year-over-year. From October to December in 2015, it booted only 21 involuntary passengers of 8.1 million total customers.

JetBlue attributes the change to its growing fleet of A321 planes, which have dozens more seats than its typical A320 aircraft. Passengers were rebooked to the next available flight “to accommodate needs like unplanned maintenance” on the larger aircraft, Sanders said.

So what does that mean for you?

Basically, there’s no real way to guarantee you won’t be forced to take a later flight. If you are, however, make sure you ask for a lot of cash.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Why Women Surgeons Around The World Are Recreating This Magazine Cover

Female surgeons across the world are tweeting photos of themselves, all thanks to a recent New Yorker magazine cover. 

The magazine’s April 3rd edition edition features an illustration on its cover by artist Malike Favre. The image is of four female surgeons in full gowns and masks, peering over an operating table.

Dr. Susan Pitt, an endocrine surgeon at the University of Wisconsin, noticed the cover and had a great idea.

“The instant I saw it I thought about how cool it would be to replicate in real life,” Pitt told BuzzFeed.

The cover came out right before Pitt went to an annual American Association of Endocrine Surgeons meeting. Once she got to the conference, Pitt rounded up three other surgeons and recreated the New Yorker cover. 

On April 4, Pitt tweeted out the magazine cover side-by-side with her reenactment, using the the hashtag #ILookLikeASurgeon. 

“I hope to open people’s eyes and minds that women can be surgeons and anything else they want to be. That there is no such thing as a ‘a man’s world,’” Pitt told BuzzFeed, adding that it feels like a “punch in the gut” when people assume women in hospitals are everything but surgeons. 

After tweeting her own photo, Pitt challenged other surgeons on Twitter to recreate the cover. 

Surgery is a male-dominated field with women making up only 19 percent of all surgeons in the U.S., according to the American Medical Association.

Many female surgeons have written about the everyday sexism they face at work. Surgeon and HuffPost contributor Niamey Wilson explained in a 2015 blog that she’s constantly mistaken for an aide or nurse.

“A woman in scrubs walking through the hospital hallways rarely gets recognized as a doctor, and almost never as a surgeon. I am most often confused for a nurse, amongst other professions,” she wrote. “On the other hand, male medical students need only don scrubs, and — BAM — they look like surgeons.” 

Pitt’s challenge quickly caught on, with female surgeons recreating the New Yorker cover in their own surgical gowns and masks, and tweeting them out.

Surgeons across the country, from the University of Wisconsin and Penn State University, to residents at UT Southwestern Medical Center in Texas, shared their reenactments of the New Yorker cover. There were even some international submissions, from Mexico and Brazil.

Head over to Twitter to see more tweets from the #ILookLikeASurgeon challenge.

H/T Buzzfeed

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

8 Lies About Sex You Need To Stop Believing, According To Sex Therapists

Almost every day in counseling sessions, sex therapists hear clients share thoughts and beliefs about sex that are not only misguided and wrong, but damaging to their love lives. 

Below, sex therapists from around the country share the biggest misconceptions they’ve heard about sex in their offices.  (Spoiler alert: Some of the biggest myths spring from the idea that sex should be spontaneous. Nope, you actually have to work at it.) 

Myth No. 1: Men should be ready to go any time, anywhere. 

“In spite of what many people think, men are not created to perform on demand. They are not robots. Sex doesn’t just happen. A man might be tired, worried, distracted or have some feelings to work out about something ― including you. Plus, as men get older, they may need direct stimulation to the penis before and during sexual activity. Sex isn’t all about you, it’s about mutual pleasure. Ask your man what gets him turned on and then do it as an active, engaged partner.” ― Stephanie Buehler, a psychologist and sex therapist who runs The Buehler Institute

Myth No. 2: If you don’t orgasm, it’s not really sex.

“Wrong! There is more to sex than having intercourse and achieving orgasm. If you believe this one, it’s time to get creative and realistic about what sex really is about. Sex is kissing, hugging and sensual massage. Sex is oral stimulation, manual stimulation, mutual masturbation and anal stimulation. Sex is talking dirty, reading erotica, watching pornography together, role play and sharing fantasies. Broaden your concept of sex, lessen your pressure and you’ll increase your enjoyment and pleasure.” ― Moushumi Ghose, a sex therapist and author of Classic Sex Positions Reinvented

Myth No. 3: You have to feel “hot enough” to truly enjoy sex.  

“Media and porn may be to blame for women believing they have to have a beautiful body to be alluring and enjoy sex. Typically, men don’t notice a woman’s physical ‘flaws.’ All they think is, ‘Oh my God, a naked woman is near me!’ I’ve suggested to my female clients that no matter what they look like, if they loves their body, men will, too. This may require cultivating an appreciation for her uniqueness. When she can start to appreciate her imperfections as endearing distinctions, she will have begun to love herself in a way that allows her to love others.” ― Diana Wiley, a marriage and family therapist and sex therapist in Seattle, Washington

Myth No. 4: Sexual infidelity happen because something is missing in the relationship. 

“While some people do have affairs because they feel they’re not getting what they want in their relationship, it’s only one of many reasons infidelity occurs. Many perfectly happily partnered people have affairs simply because the opportunity presents itself. Factors like availability, ease and minimal risk are all factors that can lead to ‘opportunity affairs.’ Some people are more likely to act on impulse. That’s why supermarkets have aisles with staples in predictable locations and impulse items at the ends and the checkout.” ― Gracie Landes, a sex therapist and marriage and family therapist in New York City 

Myth No. 5: Vaginal orgasms are easy to come by. 

“People still hold to the idea that vaginal orgasms are easy and readily available. The truth is, most women require some sort of clitoral stimulation to climax. You would be surprised how many of my clients are shocked to learn this ― even some of my clients who are physicians. The notion that strictly vaginal orgasms are the norm puts a big strain on the couple. It leaves the woman feeling frustrated and the man feeling inadequate. There’s some major misconceptions about how women climax. A vaginally quickie will rarely be the way to achieve the big O.” ― Lisa Paz, a sex therapist and marriage and family therapist in Miami, Florida

Myth No. 6: Sex should be off-the-charts hot in the beginning. 

“Many of my clients who are dating believe that their first time with someone new should and will be mindblowing. In some rare instances, this may be true, but most likely, it will be just OK or good. For most, sexual chemistry develops over time and then deepens into the mindblowing states. This is because amazing sex takes truly knowing another person and knowing them sexually. If you have never had sex with someone before, obviously you don’t know what they like, need or how you two fit together. Plus, both of you are probably a bit nervous and have put some pressure on how the event will go. The most important question at the beginning of dating to ask yourself is, ‘Am I interested in seeing this person again?’ If everything was perfect right from the get-go, it wouldn’t leave many areas to grow together. Growing together is what truly bonds people.” ―  Keeley Rankin, a sex therapist in San Francisco, California

Myth No. 7: Having to use lube means you aren’t really aroused.  

“Wrong. Lube is your friend. Lube gets a bad rap. But in all honesty, a little extra lubrication goes a long way. The misconception here is that if she is aroused, she will be wet. But arousal can be more emotional and not physical at times and using a little lube is a great way to get the fun started.” ― Ghose

Myth No. 8: A relationship can’t withstand mismatched libidos.

“The most common concern couples come into session with is arousal discrepancy ― when one person wants sex more often than the other does. I have yet to meet a couple that has been together for a long time and reports the same desire level of frequency, so having mismatched libidos doesn’t mean your relationship is doomed to fail. What’s important is having a discussion with your partner about how often you want or need sex. You also need to recognize that your wants may be different. If you have extreme differences in how frequently you want sex, it would be in both of your best interests to talk to a professional who can help sort through differences and come up with a good working plan to help both people feel satisfied with the amount of sex you’re having.” ― Rankin 

type=type=RelatedArticlesblockTitle=Related Stories + articlesList=58c1b4efe4b0d1078ca5378c,56e9db0ee4b0860f99db85e8,57740608e4b0cc0fa1362d64,5871b373e4b08052400ee35e

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Yahoo misused millions meant for humanitarian aid, lawsuit claims

Yahoo executives allowed the head of the company’s Human Rights Trust to use $13 million — the bulk of the organization’s funding — for personal gain, according to a federal lawsuit filed today in DC. These allegations aren’t new and the trust itse…

Russia hopes legitimizing Bitcoin will thwart crooks

Russia’s existing stance on bitcoin and other digital currencies is… less than welcoming. You could face website bans and prison time just for using it. However, the country is making an about-face on the idea. Deputy Finance Minister Alexey Moi…

Drone sales doubled in 2016, proving they're not a novelty

While it may have been a disappointing holiday season for some drone makers, dollar-for-dollar drone sales in the United States have more than doubled over the past year. According to a new report from market research company the NPD Group, “premium”…