Thank You, Ivanka: From One Parent To Another

Dear Ivanka,

I don’t know you. But I know some of the paths you walk: You’re a parent concerned about your children; you’re a child concerned about her dad; and sometimes what you wish for one of them conflicts with what the other wants for you. I’ve walked that tightrope myself.

My daughter Lily is the light of my life. I knew that my mother, who I loved but with whom I sometimes clashed, adored her. So a few years back when my mom voted to ban gay marriage, it was painful; it took time and more than one very hard conversation for her to understand how her vote made families like her own granddaughter’s less safe. When she got a second chance to vote against gay marriage just a few years later—she couldn’t.

This year, when copies started circulating of a potential executive order which would have allowed discrimination in the guise of religious freedom, I was deeply grateful that you and Jared intervened, making whatever case it took for your dad to keep it off the table.

I can well imagine the experience of having that conversation. My mom and your dad were high-schoolers at the same time; though age doesn’t determine one’s attitude toward equality, it certainly informs it. And our folks were raised in an era before the average parent would have dreamed of telling their kids that “love is love is love.” Thank you for helping your dad be more a part of our time.

I understand that you and Jared are trying to lead another conversation that our parents couldn’t have predicted: the one about climate change. My mom was torn about this.

On one hand, she seemed to believe the news reports she was reading; but she also felt that God would just solve it in the end. Your dad seems similarly conflicted, though for economic instead of religious reasons. And here is where I’m asking for your help: Please, for all our kids, keep talking to him, keep making him see.

For my mom, the most compelling arguments about any subject were personal ones. For instance, she was OK with “gays” in general not having full marriage equality or civil rights, but when it came to her granddaughter, she didn’t want Lily to be hurt by such limits on her dads; she just wanted Lily to be happy. Maybe you can personalize your climate discussions with your dad by reminding him what’s at stake—and I don’t mean the whole planet, a concept which would be hard to take in, or even the White House, which can only be his home for eight years. Rather, remind him of three more immediately tangible concerns: Arabella, Joseph, and Theo.

Your dad probably already knows that for hundred of millions of people globally, two degrees will affect access to food and water. But, if he is like my mom was, the bigger the scope means the greater the remove, so maybe start smaller. Focus on what matters to your kids: the things they love, the places you take them, the experiences that shape their lives.

I’ve read that Arabella likes strawberries (which you grow at home) especially in “pink” ice cream. If earth’s temperature warms by two degrees, as pretty much every credible scientist now sees as unavoidable (and some think is too optimistic at this point), there will a much shorter farming season in the reduced number of places where they are still able to grow.

California, the biggest US producer, may see harvests fall by 40 percent, and what remains will be of decreasing quality. England, which foresees higher berry rot and smaller yield, is so concerned about this that its scientists are pre-emptively trying to engineer new strawberries altogether. That’s just one example—and a very small one—of what can happen.

Hawaii, your last vacation destination as a family before inauguration, will look very different when the temperature rises by those two degrees: All the famed resort-lined beaches could be erased, moving the shoreline dramatically inward, even as the islands battle flooding and species loss. Aspen, where your kids learn to ski with their cousins, is already on the cusp of change. Scientists predict that a two-degree rise will limit Aspen’s snow cover, cause dust build-up on the peaks, kill off the trees for which the region is named, and increase the risk of devastating wildfires.

For me and Lily, our Aspen is a little island off the coast of Maine. We go there for a week every summer, sharing a house with another family and reveling in the calm of a place you can’t even drive to.

You park your car in the woods, take a skiff over, and settle in for lazy days with the kids safely roaming about as they look for crabs or build fairy houses. With climate-change-induced sea level rise, the most modest estimate suggests that the island’s will be under water by 2050; by the median estimate, the houses around the perimeter will be gone; by the most extreme estimates, the island will disappear below the surface, an obstacle ships steer around on the way to the new coast of Maine.

It will join a fast-growing roster of Atlantises lost. Just think of places you’ve been with Jared—Miami, Belize, London. If things go forward unchecked, those places could be largely underwater too, wrecks sunken by the missed opportunities of parents like you and me. Now imagine not just visiting but living in those places—or in a country like Bangladesh, expected to lose 17% of its land. Imagine your family staring down the barrel of such loss.

That’s why I try to do my part, keeping a small carbon footprint, writing about the topic, and sending this letter to you—I think you have a chance to get far more done than I can.

That’s also why this column is not some put-on or satire. It’s a real letter from one parent to another.

Though the election yielded a lot of division—which I admit I sometimes contributed to—I think the best thing Americans can do for each other (and the planet) is to acknowledge where we connect and what we have in common. I believe you and I share some important values that will make our kids’ lives better.

We’re both so lucky to have children and it’s our responsibility to care for them. I hope Arabella, Joseph, Theo, and Lily get to enjoy the best world you and I can make together.

Sincerely, Dave

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

United Airlines Quick To Respond To Complaint About Lack Of Forks On Flight

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

WASHINGTON — United Airlines expressed sympathy on Tuesday morning for a person who said they had to use their hands to eat pasta because there weren’t enough forks on their flight. The apology came one day after videos of a man being forcibly dragged off an overbooked United flight went viral. 

Twitter user @Fancienanc tweeted at comedian Jimmy Kimmel and said the utensil incident occurred while flying in first class. 

“Shame on U #UnitedAirlines customer 1st,” the tweet reads. 

Whether such a scenario actually played out is anyone’s guess. Still, United’s public relations team replied within an hour to say the apparent passenger’s story was “concerning to hear” and to ask which flight they were referencing. 

People blasted the airline on social media ― as they’ve been doing pretty consistently over the last 36 hours.

Many questioned the concern the company seemed to show about a lack of eating utensils relative to its response to the confrontation that left a customer bleeding and disoriented on Sunday. 

United CEO Oscar Munoz sent an email to employees on Monday in which he said airline agents had been “left with no choice” except to call security to remove the passenger. 

In the letter, obtained by media outlets, Munoz said United staff asked passengers to volunteer to get off the plane after airline crew members arrived at the gate and “needed to board the flight.” When not enough passengers volunteered, the airline invoked its “involuntary denial boarding process.” Security officers were called after one passenger repeatedly refused to leave the plane and became “more and more disruptive and belligerent,” Munoz wrote. 

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

United's 'Flyer Friendly' Ad Is Less Cheerful With Passenger-Ejection Clip

All the talk about United Airlines being “flyer friendly” in an old ad while an orchestra plays “Rhapsody in Blue” may seem like a lot of hooey now, doesn’t it? 

Funny or Die emphasized the point by placing a viral video of a passenger being violently dragged off a United plane this week into the spot. The airline generated heaps of criticism for the incident, which stemmed from an overbooked flight out of Chicago. 

Watch above for what now seems like a symphony of the absurd.

Here’s the original:

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

An Update For Trump Voters

  1. He said he wouldn’t bomb Syria. You bought it. Then he bombed Syria.
  2. He said he’d build a wall along the border with Mexico. You bought it. Now his secretary of homeland security says “It’s unlikely that we will build a wall.”
  3. He said he’d clean the Washington swamp. You bought it. Then he brought into his administration more billionaires, CEOs, and Wall Street moguls than in any administration in history, to make laws that will enrich their businesses.
  4. He said he’d repeal Obamacare and replace it with something “wonderful.” You bought it. Then he didn’t.
  5. He said he’d use his business experience to whip the White House into shape. You bought it. Then he created the most chaotic, dysfunctional, back-stabbing White House in modern history, in which no one is in charge.
  6. He said he’d release his tax returns, eventually. You bought it. He hasn’t, and says he never will.
  7. He said he’d divest himself from his financial empire, to avoid any conflicts of interest. You bought it. He remains heavily involved in his businesses, makes money off of foreign dignitaries staying at his Washington hotel, gets China to give the Trump brand trademark and copyright rights, manipulates the stock market on a daily basis, and has more conflicts of interest than can even be counted.
  8. He said Clinton was in the pockets of Goldman Sachs, and would do whatever they said. You bought it. Then he put half a dozen Goldman Sachs executives in positions of power in his administration.
  9. He said he’d surround himself with all the best and smartest people. You bought it. Then he put Betsy DeVos, opponent of public education, in charge of education; Jeff Sessions, opponent of the Voting Rights Act, in charge of voting rights; Ben Carson, opponent of the Fair Housing Act, in charge of fair housing; Scott Pruitt, climate change denier, in charge of the Environmental Protection Agency; and Russian quisling Rex Tillerson as Secretary of State.
  10. He said he’d faithfully execute the law. You bought it. Then he said his predecessor, Barack Obama, spied on him, without any evidence of Obama ever doing so, in order to divert attention from the FBI’s investigation into collusion between his campaign and Russian operatives to win the election.
  11. He said he knew more about strategy and terrorism than the generals did. You bought it. Then he green lighted a disastrous raid in Yemen- even though  his generals said it would be a terrible idea. This raid resulted in the deaths of a Navy SEAL, an 8-year old American girl, and numerous civilians. The actual target of the raid escaped, and no useful intel was gained
  12. He called Barack Obama “the vacationer-in-Chief” and accused him of playing more rounds of golf than Tiger Woods. He promised to never be the kind of president who took cushy vacations on the taxpayer’s dime, not when there was so much important work to be done. You bought it. He has by now spent more taxpayer money on vacations than Obama did in the first 3 years of his presidency. Not to mention all the money taxpayers are spending protecting his family, including his two sons who travel all over the world on Trump business.
  13. He called CNN, the Washington Post and the New York Times “fake news” and said they were his enemy. You bought it. Now he gets his information from Fox News, Breitbart, Gateway Pundit, and InfoWars.

More to come.

type=type=RelatedArticlesblockTitle=Related… + articlesList=58d97a3fe4b04f2f07927207,58da7b59e4b0e96354656ea7

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Donald Trump Ruined Shonda Rhimes' Original 'Scandal' Endgame

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

Once upon a time, Shonda Rhimes knew how “Scandal” was going to end.

“And then Donald Trump was elected.”

That’s how the prolific creator breaks it down in The Hollywood Reporter’s extensive oral history of the ABC political drama, which airs its 100th episode on Thursday.

Although Rhimes wouldn’t spill the original ending she’d had planned for Olivia Pope and her gladiators, she revealed that Trump’s election made her go back to the drawing board to develop a fitting conclusion in the current political climate.

“We had a destination, and I don’t know if that’s our destination anymore,” Rhimes explained. “The day after the election, the whole landscape changed.”

Since the series’ beginning, a Republican has been president, which Rhimes said was a choice she made to humanize the political party under Obama’s administration. With Trump in office, portraying Republicans in the world of “Scandal” has been considerably more challenging.

“We had a Democratic president [when ‘Scandal’ premiered], so I wanted to take a Republican president and make him human,” she said. “Then our stories would be about what would happen if the wheels came off the bus and nobody was driving the bus. The problem now is the wheels have come off the bus, and nobody’s driving.”

Over the last two seasons, writers have had to scrap storylines that veered too closely to real headlines ― such as a Russian hacking scandal that compromised a presidential election ― and now the show’s approach has changed entirely.

“There was a very specific planned progression that was going to be easy to tell because Hillary [Clinton] was going to be president, and we were going to be living in the light. But it didn’t occur,” Rhimes said. “I’m still trying to come to terms with that. One bad thing after another keeps happening, and the world feels very unstable. So in a world in which all of the things that we would write on ‘Scandal’ are happening in real life, it’s very hard to write ‘Scandal’ the way we used to, when it was like, ‘Let’s make Washington the most outrageous, horrifying place it could ever be.’”

To read the full “Scandal” oral history, head over to The Hollywood Reporter.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

'Feminist Baby' Is Smashing The Patriarchy In These Hilarious Comics

Illustrator and designer Loryn Brantz had been trying to think of a children’s story she could tell that would make a positive impact. So one day while looking for a baby book to buy for a friend’s shower, she conceived of Feminist Baby.

“I wanted to write a book that I would want to give to my friends’ babies, and to my own possible future babies,” she told The Huffington Post. 

Brantz created a board book that could expose babies to the word “feminism” and serve as a jumping-off point for parents to talk to their children about feminism. (”Feminist baby likes pink and blue,” one page reads.)

“I’d like to think that if a child loves Feminist Baby, it will help them have a positive association with feminism later on in life,” she says. 

While waiting for her book to come out, Brantz missed drawing the character, and started drawing comics aimed at adults that feature the baby. 

In the comics, Feminist Baby serves as an underage heroine bent on smashing the patriarchy and subverting tired traditions like the “gender reveal.” The panels provide both political commentary (she punches Steve Bannon who is dressed as a Nazi) and silly comic relief. But while they’re aimed at different audiences, both the comics and the book express the same basic message.

“Feminism is for everyone ― including babies!” Brantz says. 

Scroll down to see more of Brantz’s Feminist Baby comics, and buy the book here.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Trans Singer Records Duet With Himself Pre And Post Transition

A transgender singer named Charlie Peck has recorded a beautiful tribute for the transgender community: a duet with himself featuring his higher register before beginning hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and with his lower register, recorded nine months into HRT.

Peck told The Huffington Post that he decided to make the video, which features a cover of “Home” by Edward Sharpe and the Magnetic Zeros, after watching other people’s voice comparison videos online ― and after thinking about how much of his identity is presented through his voice.

“I was first and foremost hoping for a voice that I could identify with,” Peck told The Huffington Post. “In contact with other humans, the filter through which everything you say is perceived is your voice. I was also really scared that I would not be able to sing any more. With these thoughts in my head an idea about singing as a way to show others my journey started to form. When I contacted my very talented friend, André Åhl Persson, who is also a musician, and he was willing and thrilled to do this project with me this seed of an idea started to grow.”

Peck went on to tell HuffPost that while he’s thrilled his video has made such an impact outside of the community, at the end of the day it’s a project for transgender people. 

“There are many ways to transition and to find yourself,” Peck continued. “This was my way. I am not telling every trans* individuals story, but I am giving them mine… The lyrics of the song, with some modifications made by me, say so much. You are not alone, things can get better and put yourself before everybody else’s expectations on how you should live your life. Now that I have the energy to give something back to the trans* community ― this is my heart medicine for those in need.”

Check out Peck’s cover of “Home” above and head here to see more from the singer. 

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Hero Student Shot During Woman's Rescue Watches Scene For First Time

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

Peter Gold lay crumpled on a New Orleans street with a gunshot wound to his stomach when his attacker pointed a firearm at his head and repeatedly pulled the trigger.

Now, over a year later, he finally watched that traumatic scene for the first time on video, calling the moment his attacker’s gun jammed “an incredible miracle.”

“I think about that day, every single day of my life. There’s not a day that passes by,” he told NBC’s Matt Lauer on the “Today Show” Tuesday.

Gold was driving through the city’s Lower Garden District while on the phone to his parents on November 20, 2015, when he saw a gunman dragging a woman along a sidewalk. He stopped to intervene and faced the barrel of a gun seconds later. The gunman told him to hand over money ― which the then 25-year-old Tulane University medical student said he didn’t have. Gold’s parents listened to the entire exchange.

“I remember being right there and looking this guy in the face as he held his gun to me,” said Gold. “He told me point blank, at point blank, ‘I’m going to kill you.’ And he shot me in the stomach, I fell to the ground.”

Surveillance video captured Gold lying in pain on a sidewalk as the gunman repeatedly held the jammed gun to his head before fleeing with the woman’s purse.

Police later arrested Euric Cain, who pleaded guilty to charges including the attempted murder of Gold and the kidnap and rape of a man and woman less than 24 hours after attacking the medical student. 

Gold is now fully recovered and is finishing a residency at a hospital in New York City. He’s also starting a non-profit foundation called Strong City, which he said aims to help youth in need by supporting community-based organizations that have already made this their mission. 

His curiosity on what happened to Cain to transform him into such a cold-hearted criminal inspired Gold to start the foundation.

“What happened in somebody’s life that they were able to create such violence with such ease, without even thinking about it? What happened in his community, what happened at school, what happened in his family?” he said.

“This was traumatic to my friends and family. All of us are looking forward and trying to do something positive from what happened here.” 

Cain is now serving a 54-year sentence for his violent crimes, after a judge sentenced him in October.

Gold faced his attempted killer once more, when he attended Cain’s court hearing.

“I woke up two days later in the hospital surrounded by my family and a group of best friends,” Gold told Cain in a statement that he shared with NBC. “This moment will forever be the happiest moment in my life. I was alive. You hadn’t killed me, and with my family by my side, I knew I would bounce back stronger than ever. Strong enough to stand face to face with you again.”

type=type=RelatedArticlesblockTitle=Related… + articlesList=589b3f33e4b04061313a9cae,55dc92c0e4b0a40aa3ac3bf9,57fd5893e4b044be3015e6d9,585328b0e4b0fb6afe4bcdfa

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Jeff Sessions Prepares DOJ For Crackdown On Unauthorized Border-Crossers

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

U.S. attorneys around the country will devote more resources to prosecuting immigration offenses, including illegal re-entry to the country, document fraud, identity theft and smuggling undocumented immigrants across the border, Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced Tuesday.

“For those that continue to seek improper and illegal entry into this country, be forewarned: This is a new era,” Sessions told Customs and Border Protection agents and officers in Nogales, Arizona, according to prepared remarks. “This is the Trump era. The lawlessness, the abdication of the duty to enforce our immigration laws, and the catch-and-release practices of old are over.”

President Donald Trump vowed to stop unauthorized immigration and expel many undocumented people from the country, and he picked an ally in Sessions, who spent much of his Senate career advocating for tougher enforcement. Now he’s getting his chance and is shaping the Department of Justice’s mission to expand its emphasis on prosecuting undocumented immigrants. Every U.S. attorney’s office in the country ― even far from the border ― will now be required to have a person devoted to coordinating enforcement on immigration, Sessions announced.

The policies he laid out are almost exclusively focused on non-violent crimes, such as illegally re-entering the country, entering a fraudulent marriage, document fraud and identity theft. U.S. attorneys will now be required to consider prosecution for each. Every adult apprehended at the border will be detained.

Sessions painted the matter in stark terms, saying that gangs and cartels “turn cities and suburbs into war zones, that rape and kill innocent citizens, and who profit by smuggling poison and other human beings across our borders.”

“Depravity and violence are their calling cards, including brutal machete attacks and beheadings,” Sessions said. “It is here, on this sliver of land, where we first take our stand against this filth.”

The Department of Justice did not provide details on how these efforts will be funded and whether there will be additional resources so the renewed focus on immigration-related enforcement on nonviolent officials will not lead to lower levels of prosecutions and investigation of other crimes. DOJ spokesman Ian Prior said Trump’s “budget blue print made clear the Department’s commitment to public safety, combatting violent crime, drug trafficking, and illegal immigration” and that further details will be in the agency’s budget “this spring.”

Sessions laid out several policy priorities in a memo to all federal prosecutors, titled “Renewed Commitment to Criminal Immigration Enforcement.” Prosecutors will be required to consider prosecution for people who transport or harbor unauthorized immigrants across the border, putting a priority on those who smuggle three or more individuals, he wrote.

U.S. attorney’s offices will also crack down on individuals who illegally re-enter the U.S. without authorization. Re-entering the country after a prior removal will be referred for felony prosecution, “especially where indicators of gang affiliation, a risk to public safety, or criminal history are present,” he said. Attorneys must consider prosecution in every instance of an individual re-entering the country without authorization after being removed.

They must also consider felony prosecution for individuals with two or more prior misdemeanor convictions for improper entry, or one or more prior misdemeanor convictions if there are certain circumstances, such as prior removals, felonies or gang affiliation, according to the memo.

Government attorneys will also consider felony prosecution for individuals who get married to evade immigration laws, Sessions wrote. When possible in these cases, attorneys must pursue charges for document fraud and aggravated identity theft, with a two-year mandatory minimum sentence for the latter.

Prosecutors will put a top priority on going after people who assault, resist or impede federal immigration officers, Sessions added.

Sessions said the Department of Justice will also ramp up its hiring efforts for immigration judges ― adding 50 this year and 75 next year ― to cut current backlogs that lead to many undocumented immigrants waiting years to have their cases resolved.

The attorney general, like other Trump administration officials and the president himself, tied a drop in unauthorized border crossings to the president’s immigration policies. Legal advocates believe part of that drop is due to CBP agents turning away asylum-seekers in violation of international law, which CBP denies. In addition to deportations, the Executive Office for Immigration Review, which is part of the Department of Justice, handles cases for asylum and other relief.

“We will execute a strategy that once again secures the border; apprehends and prosecutes those criminal aliens that threaten our public safety; takes the fight to gangs like MS-13 and Los Zetas; and makes dismantlement and destruction of the cartels a top priority,” Sessions said in his speech, according to prepared remarks. “We will deploy a multifaceted approach in these efforts: we are going to interdict your drugs on the way in, your money on the way out, and investigate and prosecute your trafficking networks to the fullest extent of the law.”

Read the memo below:

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Chuck Schumer Warns Trump Not To Ruin Budget Talks By Getting Involved

WASHINGTON ― When Congress returns from its spring break, it will have just four days to pass a spending plan for the rest of the year and thereby head off a government shutdown.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) said Tuesday that despite the looming April 28 deadline, President Donald Trump hasn’t been negotiating with Democrats on a deal. And he said that’s just fine ― because lawmakers on the Hill are on track to get it done and Trump should just leave those Art of the Deal impulses in a trophy case at Mar-a-Lago.

Republican leaders have claimed the White House was including Democrats in talks over spending bills for the rest of this year and for 2018, but Schumer said that was news to him.

“I don’t know where they came up with that,” Schumer told reporters on a conference call, adding that he’d had one conversation with White House budget director Mick Mulvaney and that was to tell him Trump’s budget proposal was dead.

“I told Director Mulvaney that I thought his budget was so far away from where both Senate Democrats and Senate Republicans — a number of them have called it dead on arrival — that his next year’s budget was sort of a non-starter,” Schumer said.

Rather than try to push the White House’s vision, Schumer suggested Mulvaney and Trump leave it to the lawmakers.

“I said to him that the best thing he can do is let the four corners ― House Republicans, House Democrats, Senate Republicans, Senate Democrats — negotiate this 2017 budget as well as the 2018 budget, and we might be able to come up with things,” Schumer said. “I said that to [Senate Majority Leader Mitch] McConnell as well, and he didn’t argue with me. I said I don’t even know who to negotiate with on 2017, given where their budget is. So there are no negotiations.” 

McConnell told reporters this past Friday, before Congress left for two weeks, that talks were proceeding and that Democrats would have to be involved in order to pass anything. He was optimistic they would.

While Schumer and other top Democrats may not be hearing from the White House, the minority leader was similarly optimistic ― as long as Trump doesn’t decide to practice his art.

“We can get this done. We Democrats want to get it done. We hope our Republican colleagues won’t insist on things that force a government shutdown,” Schumer said. “But I think talks are going pretty well right now, and the White House doesn’t have to throw a monkey wrench into it.”

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.