Sling Cloud DVR Expanded To Users On Android And Roku


It has been a month since Sling TV announced its Cloud DVR “First Look” program which provided subscribers on an Amazon Fire TV or Fire tablet to get 50 hours of cloud storage for $5 per month. A month after coming out with this feature for the very first time, Sling TV today announced that it is expanding the Cloud DVR First Look to other platforms. It’s now available for users on Android and Roku as well.

Everything else remains the same as it has been for Amazon device owners for over a month. Sling TV subscribers on Roku and Android can also purchase 50 hours of storage for all of their content for just $5 per month with any Sling TV subscription.

The Cloud DVR feature will enable users to watch their favorite shows, movies, games, and more on their own time by automatically having the show saved and available for streaming from the cloud.

The feature makes room for new recordings by automatically deleting old records once the 50GB capacity is hit, it starts by copying over the oldest watched recording to make more space for new content.

Dish-owned Sling TV has also confirmed that it’s soon going to expand Cloud DVR to the Apple TV, this is going to happen in the coming weeks. More devices will get Cloud DVR in the coming months as well.

Sling Cloud DVR Expanded To Users On Android And Roku , original content from Ubergizmo. Read our Copyrights and terms of use.

Comcast Developing Streaming Service For Hit NBC Shows


According to a new report, Comcast is looking to compete with the likes of Netflix by coming out with a new online TV streaming service that will offer hit shows from its NBCUniversal TV networks. There isn’t a lot of information available about this new streaming service at this point in time but it’s believed that the company is looking to launch it within the next 12 to 18 months.

Bloomberg reports that this as yet unnamed streaming service is going to include programs from the NBC broadcast network and may also include TV shows from Comcast’s cable channels that include SyFy, Bravo, and USA.

Comcast is said to be still determining just what it wants to offer with this service and one of the things under consideration is said to be whether a live feed of the broadcast network will be offered and whether the streaming service will provide access to sports as well.

It may take up to a year and a half for Comcast to come out with this service given that it’s still bound to some restrictions that were imposed by regulators in its deal for NBCUniversal. The restrictions make it difficult for Comcast to sell services that only offer its own content.

The last of these restrictions will expire in September next year, leaving Comcast to do as it pleases as far as services with just its own content are concerned.

Comcast Developing Streaming Service For Hit NBC Shows , original content from Ubergizmo. Read our Copyrights and terms of use.

#LiveFree Backpack sings to digital nomads with wireless charging

Mobile devices have changed not only our lifestyles but has even changed the nature of our work. Some are no longer tether to any desk, office, or even city while others have some amount of freedom to be out and about, as long as they check in from time to time. These road warriors and digital nomads have also created … Continue reading

Windows Vista is officially dead

More than 10 years after it first launched, Microsoft has officially ended support for Windows Vista. Today is the final day for Windows Vista extended support, which means that the divisive operating system is well and truly dead. This move from Microsoft comes nearly five years to the day after mainstream support for Vista ended. So, what does the end … Continue reading

North Korea State Media Warns Of Nuclear Strike If Provoked As U.S. Warships Approach

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

North Korean state media on Tuesday warned of a nuclear attack on the United States at any sign of U.S. aggression as a U.S. Navy strike group steamed towards the western Pacific.

U.S. President Donald Trump, who has urged China to do more to rein in its impoverished neighbour, said in a Tweet North Korea was “looking for trouble” and the United States would “solve the problem” with or without China’s help.

Tension has escalated sharply on the Korean peninsula with talk of military action by the United States gaining traction following its strikes last week against Syria and amid concerns the reclusive North may soon conduct a sixth nuclear test.

North Korea’s official Rodong Sinmun newspaper said the country was prepared to respond to any aggression by the United States.

“Our revolutionary strong army is keenly watching every move by enemy elements with our nuclear sight focused on the U.S. invasionary bases not only in South Korea and the Pacific operation theatre but also in the U.S. mainland,” it said.

South Korean acting President Hwang Kyo-ahn warned of “greater provocations” by North Korea and ordered the military to intensify monitoring and to ensure close communication with the United States.

“It is possible the North may wage greater provocations such as a nuclear test timed with various anniversaries including the Supreme People’s Assembly,” said Hwang, acting leader since former president Park Geun-hye was removed amid a graft scandal.

Trump said in a Tweet a trade deal between China and the United States would be “far better for them if they solved the North Korea problem”.

“If China decides to help, that would be great,” he said. “If not, we will solve the problem without them!”

Trump and his Chinese counterpart, Xi Jinping, met in Florida last week and Trump pressed Xi to do more to rein in North Korea.

The North convened a Supreme People’s Assembly session on Tuesday, one of its twice-yearly sessions in which major appointments are announced and national policy goals are formally approved. It did not immediately release details.

But South Korean officials took pains to quell talk in social media of an impending security crisis or outbreak of war.

“We’d like to ask precaution so as not to get blinded by exaggerated assessment about the security situation on the Korean peninsula,” Defence Ministry spokesman Moon Sang-kyun said.

Saturday is the 105th anniversary of the birth of Kim Il Sung, the country’s founding father and grandfather of current ruler, Kim Jong Un.

A military parade is expected in the North’s capital, Pyongyang, to mark the day. North Korea often also marks important anniversaries with tests of its nuclear or missile capabilities in breach of U.N. Security Council resolutions.

Men and women in colourful outfits were singing and dancing on the streets of Pyongyang, illuminated by better lighting than that seen in previous years, apparently practising for the parade planned.

Syrian President Bashar al-Assad sent a message of congratulations to mark the event, lambasting “big powers” for their “expansionist” policy.

“The friendly two countries are celebrating this anniversary and, at the same time, conducting a war against big powers’ wild ambition to subject all countries to their expansionist and dominationist policy and deprive them of their rights to self-determination,” the North’s KCNA news agency quoted the message as saying.

The North’s foreign ministry, in a statement carried by KCNA, said the U.S. navy strike group’s approach showed America’s “reckless moves for invading had reached a serious phase”.

“We never beg for peace but we will take the toughest counteraction against the provocateurs in order to defend ourselves by powerful force of arms and keep to the road chosen by ourselves,” an unidentified ministry spokesman said.

North Korea and the rich, democratic South are technically still at war because their 1950-53 conflict ended in a truce, not a peace treaty. The North regularly threatens to destroy the South and its main ally, the United States.

RUSSIAN WORRIES

North Korea is emerging as one of the most pressing foreign policy problems facing the Trump administration.

The North has conducted five nuclear tests, two of them last year, and is working to develop nuclear-tipped missiles that can reach the United States.

The Trump administration is reviewing its policy towards North Korea and has said all options are on the table, including military strikes, but U.S. officials said non-military action appeared to be at the top of the list.

Russia’s foreign ministry, in a statement ahead of a visit by U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, said it was concerned about many aspects of U.S. foreign policy, particularly on North Korea.

“We are really worried about what Washington has in mind for North Korea after it hinted at the possibility of a unilateral military scenario,” the ministry said.

“It’s important to understand how that would tally with collective obligations on de-nuclearising the Korean peninsula, something that is underpinned in U.N. Security Council resolutions.”

Russia condemned U.S. cruise missile strikes on a Syrian air base on Friday, calling them an illegal attack on a sovereign state.

The U.S. Navy strike group Carl Vinson was diverted from port calls to Australia and would move towards the western Pacific Ocean near the Korean peninsula as a show of force, a U.S. official told Reuters on the weekend.

U.S. officials said the strike group would take more than a week to reach waters near the Korean peninsula.

China and South Korea agreed on Monday to impose tougher sanctions on North Korea if it carried out nuclear or long-range missile tests, a senior official in Seoul said.

On Tuesday, a fleet of North Korean cargo ships was heading home, most of the vessels fully laden, after China ordered its trading companies to return the coal to curb the trade, sources with direct knowledge of the trade said.

The order was given on April 7, just as Trump and Xi were set for the summit where they agreed the North Korean nuclear advances had reached a “very serious stage”, Tillerson said.

Following repeated missile tests that drew international criticism, China banned all imports of North Korean coal on Feb. 26, cutting off the country’s most important export product.

The North is seen ready to conduct its sixth nuclear test at any time, with movements detected by satellite at its Punggye-ri nuclear test site.

(Additional reporting by Ju-min Park in Seoul, Idrees Ali in Washington and Andrew Osborn in Moscow; Writing by Jack Kim; Editing by Robert Birsel and Nick Macfie)

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Here’s Why U.S.-Russia Military Conflict Over Syria Is Looking More And More Likely

MOSCOW ― The Russia-U.S. relationship is rapidly getting back to “normal” ― mutual rejection and confrontation. Just days ago, U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson’s visit to Moscow this week was anticipated with hope that the two countries would at last start working on a new agenda and preparing a meeting of their presidents. But the attack on Syria has changed the nature of the trip: now it will be an attempt to ease a new acute crisis in relations between Moscow and Washington.

It now seems clear that the visit ― the first one to Russia since the new U.S. administration came to power ― will rehearse the past instead of herald a new departure. What conclusions has Moscow drawn from the failed rapprochement with Trump?

Firstly, Washington’s internal objectives have outweighed external ones. In fact, this is fully consonant with the “America First” priorities Trump has declared but in a somewhat unexpected way. He was generally expected to reduce foreign policy activism and move in the direction of isolationism in order to focus on domestic problems. But having encountered challenges in implementing his domestic political agenda, Trump decided to use foreign policy as an instrument for improving the political atmosphere around his administration.

His tactics proved successful ― the strike on Syria was the first move to win broad approval in Washington. But this is very dangerous strategically, because the White House has no further plan of action in Syria. As one can see from a series of contradictory statements, it is not clear what exactly the U.S. wants to achieve there.   

Washington is essentially returning to its own position of two to three years ago ― regime change in Syria and support for rebels ― but in an entirely new situation which, in the worst-case scenario, can lead to a direct military confrontation with Russian armed forces. The main impetus of his action is less about an international strategy than a desire to reverse the current political situation in the U.S.

For Trump, an agreement can only be reached from a position of strength. But for Putin, there can be no agreement under pressure.

Secondly, Russia-U.S. confrontation is the norm. Trump’s election sparked hopes in Moscow that radical changes in the American policy could help improve bilateral relations. These illusions are gone now.

Russia is not in and of itself an important focus for the U.S. It is not a priority but rather an instrument for tackling other tasks that are truly important to the U.S.  The disproportionate attention Russia is given in American political debates should not mislead anyone in Moscow. This is not a sign of its significance but, on the contrary, an indication of disregard. Russia appears to be only a convenient foil useful for settling political contention between different interest groups in Washington.

At the same time, there is one factor that has not changed for decades: mutual nuclear deterrence, the ability of the two countries to destroy each other physically. This underlies the confrontational nature of relations which has gone in circles since the 1950s from aggravation to relaxation and back.

The widespread support of the strike by allies will encourage Washington to act in the same vein again.

Thirdly, Trump is not impulsive and unpredictable. He has acted exactly as he declared. The main idea of his political rhetoric during the election campaign and before it was that “everyone must respect us, and if anyone doesn’t, we will make him do it.” The purpose of the strike on a Syrian military base was to show everyone that America is back in the game, the period of confusion and standoffishness is over, and neither Russia nor anyone else can act as if the U.S. is not there. In this respect, Trump thinks much the same way as Russian President Vladimir Putin, whom he complimented for outplaying Obama.

But there is also a fundamental difference. Apart from his readiness to act decisively and unexpectedly, without always abiding by formal procedures, Putin has a clear goal to achieve, be it move into Crimea or intervene in Syria. Trump and his team produce no such impression, and their desire to demonstrate strength and determination is apparently a value in itself. This leads us to the next difference. Putin is a master of risky, brinkmanship games, which means that he is aware of the risks and the red lines involved. Whether Trump, who has no experience in international relations, is aware of them is a big question.

Fourthly, it would be senseless for either side to make concessions under the present circumstances. For Trump, an agreement can only be reached from a position of strength. But for Putin, there can be no agreement under pressure. This is risky and can have far-reaching consequences.  Russia is clearly not seeking confrontation at this point unless pressure keeps growing. But, judging from various leaks in Washington, it will grow and thus so will the counteraction.

If pressure keeps growing, Russia will respond in its own manner ― asymmetrically and sharply.

One can only count on the prudence of the military on both sides in taking precautions to avoid a direct conflict. But this is a very fragile situation in the absence of political contact. Political coordination with a partner who is guided primarily by domestic needs and considerations of prestige is an extremely unreliable undertaking. 

Theoretically, one can assume that by strengthening his political positions inside America, Trump will get more leeway in relations with Russia. But the political crisis in the U.S. is so deep and acute that one demonstrative action is obviously not enough and will have to be followed by others. The unanimous support of the strike by allies, who rejoiced that the U.S. showed its willpower and resolve, will encourage Washington to act in the same vein again. Faint prospects for a political settlement that began to emerge when the U.S. had stepped back may be ruined again by great-power rivalry. Its logic is merciless, with priority given not to the interests of the Syrian people but to the prestige of the major players, which is extremely important for both Putin and Trump.  

One could generally say that the Russian-U.S. relationship is getting back to normal if it were not for the fact that there is no understanding of Washington’s priorities and goals across the international agenda. Russia will most likely show guarded restraint and give up its illusory hope for any qualitative change in Russia-U.S. relations. But if pressure keeps growing, Russia will respond in its own manner ― asymmetrically and sharply.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

International Travel: Opera, Luxurious Lodging and Great Food in Venice, Italy

It had been nagging at us: Despite the pleasure we take in opera tourism, Jackie and I had never been to the Teatro La Fenice in Venice, except on a guided tour soon after the theater had been rebuilt following a disastrous arson fire in 1996. None of our handful of trips to the city had coincided with productions at the theater. Finally, though, the opera calendar and our travel calendar overlapped, and we spent three nights in Venice in the latter part of March. The show was Bizet’s Carmen, in a riveting production by the Catalan director Calixto Bieito. We’d seen it before, five years ago in London, but were knocked out anew by its power and intelligence. The (mostly) gritty sets, costumes and staging were quite a contrast with the glittering gilt ornamentation covering every square centimeter of the auditorium, whose lively acoustics enhanced the musical experience: We nearly jumped out of our seats at the overture’s opening cymbal crash. The Fenice is a blessedly small theater, and seats sell quickly, but anyone who’s fond of opera should get on line, see what’s playing and try to buy tickets – then, build a trip around the show.

Luxurious Accommodation

Another of our unmet Venice wishes had been to stay at the Hotel Danieli, centered on the fourteenth-century Palazzo Dandolo and sprawling over three buildings along the Riva degli Schiavoni, a one-minute walk from Piazza San Marco and convenient to several useful water-bus lines. The vast lobby, with its galleries and stone staircases, used to be the palazzo’s internal courtyard; if you didn’t know it was old, you could be forgiven for thinking it the fantasy of a well-traveled nineteenth-century robber baron. (At the moment, part of the lobby is under refurbishment, so the space is not as expansive as it normally is.)

We had a moment’s disappointment when we were told that our room was to be in the newest part of the hotel – “newest” meaning it was built in the 1940s – but were gleeful when we saw our lodgings. Along with the rest of the hotel, they’d been redone by the French designer Jacques Garcia, the author of some of our very favorite hotel décors, including at the Metropole in Monte Carlo and the Costes in Paris. Mr. Garcia has a way of making you feel bonelessly relaxed in his richly, deeply colored and finely detailed interiors, which fall somewhere along the path between a Parisian literary salon and a bordello de luxe. This part of the Danieli creates exactly that embracing feeling; the other, more traditionally decorated buildings do not moan “Garcia” quite so seductively. Whenever we got tuckered out with tourism, we’d spend a few minutes trying to figure out how the billowing draperies and extraordinarily complex tassels were conceived and manufactured.

Members of the Danieli staff – from receptionists to concierges to waiters – are friendly, knowledgeable and forthcoming; the bar makes good drinks and post-opera sandwiches; and breakfast is served on a top-floor terrace with perfect views of San Giorgio Maggiore and its Palladian church of the same name. We had a grand time there.

Dining

Because one evening was filled with opera, we ate only two real dinners on this trip (plus our late-night sandwiches at the hotel bar). The first was at a restaurant I had read about in The New York Times: Local. That brief review does a good job of conveying the background and spirit of the place, so I’ll limit myself to saying that we had a marvelous, interesting meal there, in which local produce was treated with skill, intelligence and respect. While combinations were innovative, with well-integrated hints of Asia (not really incongruous in Venice, much of whose wealth was long ago amassed through international trade), flavors were unfailingly clear and all that we ate was delicious, notably tortelli of artichoke with a light-handed accompaniment of capers and stracciatella (like a mixture of mozzarella and cream); and beautifully fatty, lightly smoked glazed eel from the Venetian lagoon with a mango-miso puree. Charming people work at Local, all of whom speak good English.

Our second dinner was at a restaurant we had visited – twice – during our last stay in Venice, in 2014: Al Covo, which is not far from Local (or the Danieli), as it happens. It is operated by Cesare Benelli and his American wife, Diane Rankin, and its ample season-appropriate menu is always supplemented by treats from the market. On the night we were there, these included spider crab meat removed from the shell and simply dressed with great olive oil to bring out its subtle oceanic flavor; monkfish wrapped in paper-thin slices of pancetta and grilled; and the tiny soft-shell crabs called moeche. We ate them all, plus a dish of burrata, salsa verde and anchovies, and one of rigatoni in a deceptively simple sauce based on shreds of salt cod. That sounds like a lot of food, doesn’t it? And yes, it is unusual for us to order antipasti, pasta and a main course. But that’s the beauty of Al Covo: we did have an antipasto apiece, but our rigatoni and our monkfish were shared, and the deep-fried moeche were a mere tasting portion to start with. Our waiter suggested this approach (and indeed, tried to stop the people at the next table from over-ordering, which they did anyway), and also made it clear that if we didn’t like the wine we’d ordered, they’d swap it for something else. Good restaurants will often do that, no questions asked, but they don’t usually advertise the fact.

For someone who’s in Venice for only a few days, these two restaurants plus some stand-up cichetti and one simple, totally traditional restaurant/trattoria/osteria/bacaro will cover the ground: unreconstructed Venetian cooking at a bacaro; tradition combined with imagination, all in a Venetian context, at Al Covo; and a more international approach to tradition at Local.

* * *

Hotel Danieli. Castello 4196, Venice; +39 041 522 6480; http://www.danielihotelvenice.com/. Depending on season and availability, you can find a double for as little as $415, but typical rates are higher.

Local. Salizzada dei Greci 3303, Castello, Venice; +39 041 2411128; info@ristorantelocal.com; http://www.ristorantelocal.com. Prix-fixe dinner, three dishes for €60; ordering à la carte is also possible. Closed Tuesday and at lunchtime on Wednesday.

Al Covo. Castello 3968, Venice 30122; +39 041 5223812; info@ristorantealcovo.com; http://ristorantealcovo.com/. Our meal cost €100 for two, including wine, with two antipasti, one pasta, one main dish and one dessert. Closed Wednesday and Thursday.

There are many options for cichetti and for traditional informal restaurants. I like All’Arco for morning or afternoon snacks (Sestiere San Polo 436, Venice, near the Rialto market; +39 041 520 5666) and have eaten well, both standing and sitting, at Cà D’Oro alla Vedova (Calle del Pistor, Cannaregio 3912; +39 041 5285324; reservations taken for dinner only). If you are looking for a cup of coffee or a drink on a canal-side terrace open to the water that is neither crowded nor expensive, try the café in the Ca’Pesaro art museum, well worth a visit and just beyond the area most heavily frequented by tour groups.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Kansas Democrats Are About To Show Just How Big The Anti-Trump Wave Actually Is

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

 Voters in Kansas’ fourth congressional district are heading to the polls on Tuesday in an unexpectedly close race. And there’s a chance they’ll send President Donald Trump a rebuke in the first federal election since he won the White House in November.

The contest is over the seat formerly held by Mike Pompeo, the tea party congressman Trump picked to run the CIA. Republicans have a considerable advantage in the district, which is home to Koch Industries, as Pompeo was re-elected by over 31 points in November. Ron Estes, the Republican state treasurer, remains the favorite to win.

However, the race appears to be closer than expected. Despite the GOP advantage, Democrat James Thompson, a civil rights attorney and Army veteran, raised about $240,000 in small donations, much of which came in the waning days of the race.

Early voting numbers, while not necessarily an indicator of final turnout, showed more enthusiasm than usual among Democrats. Perhaps emboldened by this as the election approached, Thompson openly embraced support from a group that Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) backs.

National leaders from both parties have taken note, indicating the closeness and urgency of the race. After weeks of ignoring the surging Democratic enthusiasm in the district, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee on Monday gave Thompson a last-minute boost, making live calls to voters on his behalf.

Republicans dispatched high profile surrogates including Vice President Mike Pence and Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and spent nearly $120,000 in the final days of the campaign, signaling how scared they were in a race that should have never even been close. Trump himself even recorded a phone call for Estes at the last minute and tweeted his support on Tuesday morning.

Last week, before the GOP intervention, internal polling showed Estes with only a single-digit lead, The New York Times reported on Monday.

Thompson told The Huffington Post in an interview over the weekend that even if he loses, he still considers the race to be a victory for Democrats because it shows that they can make Republican strongholds competitive.

And Democratic officials, who initially saw the race as a long-shot, finally seem to be warming to that idea.

Attempting to explain their initial reluctance to intervene, a DCCC official told HuffPost on Monday that its involvement would have been “extremely damaging” because the GOP would use it against Thompson. But the unexpected Democratic mobilization provoked a change in strategy.

“Now that the race is being nationalized, and the involvement of a national party committee can’t be used against him, we don’t want Thompson to go unprotected,” the official said, adding that the race provides an opportunity to test the party’s strategies for future elections.

The Kansas race is one of three special elections across the country where Democrats could win in places traditionally dominated by the GOP. In Georgia’s sixth congressional district, early numbers look good for Jon Ossoff, a 30-year-old running for the seat once held by Newt Gingrich that Tom Price had vacated to become secretary of Health and Human Services.

In Montana, Democrats also have a chance of picking up the House seat vacated by Ryan Zinke, a Republican tapped by Trump to lead the Department of the Interior. Republicans are concerned enough they could lose that they’ve worked to block a mail-in voting effort that would increase turnout.

Around the country, a groundswell of Democratic activism has already begun to shape state-level special elections, with Democrats making gains in traditionally Republican areas.

type=type=RelatedArticlesblockTitle=Related… + articlesList=58e6ac26e4b0ace57cc0b43a,58ea3423e4b05413bfe38f8b,58e90124e4b058f0a02f9e25

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Nurses Ignore Hospital Regulations To Grant Dying Man His Final Wish

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

Nurses in Denmark benevolently broke their hospital’s regulations last week to grant a 75-year-old man his dying wish.

After doctors at Aarhus University Hospital told Carsten Flemming Hansen that he was too sick for surgery and would die within days from internal bleeding following an aortic aneurysm, he revealed the final thing he wanted to do.

And that was to smoke a cigarette and drink a glass of cold white wine outside, while watching the sun set.

According to a post on the hospital’s Facebook account, nurses wheeled Hansen out onto a balcony on a bed last Tuesday and broke the building’s strict no-smoking policy by allowing him to light up.

He then enjoyed a spectacular sunset as he sipped his drink, surrounded by close family and friends.

It was a very cozy and relaxed atmosphere,” said one of the nurses, Rikke Kvist. “Of course they were relatives also affected by the fact that he was going to die, and they were sad.”

The hospital shared a photograph of Hansen online Friday, shortly after he died. It’s since gone viral, with many people praising the nurses’ compassionate deed:

type=type=RelatedArticlesblockTitle=Related Coverage + articlesList=57946573e4b02d5d5ed1e361,58d2342ce4b0b22b0d1823ff,58997509e4b040613138e229

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

The Androgynous 'Third Gender' Of 17th-Century Japan

Generation Z refers to individuals born during the mid-1990s and early ‘00s often billed as the generation most likely to fully embrace gender fluidity. According to one report, around 56 percent of teens ages 13 to 20 know of someone who identifies themselves using gender-neutral pronouns like “they” or “ze.” Regarding sexual orientation, the study found that approximately one-third of the demographic has chosen to identify as neither heterosexual or homosexual, indicating that they are bisexual “to some degree.”

When it comes to matters of gender and sexuality, however, the prerogatives of this up-and-coming age group are not necessarily unprecedented. In fact, many living during Japan’s Edo period, which stretched from the early 1600s to about 1868, recognized a third gender centuries ago. That gender was known as “wakashu,” or “beautiful youths.”

The cultural subgroup typically consisted of adolescent boys who had not yet entered into adulthood, and in the interim, were seen as androgynous, culturally permitted to present as both male and female and as the objects of desire for both men and women. That is, until they removed their forelocks in a coming-of-age ceremony known as “genpuku.”

An exhibition dedicated to the portrayal of wakashu in Japanese art is now on view for the first time in North America. Titled “A Third Gender: Beautiful Youths in Japanese Prints,” the show features erotic prints from the 17th to 19th centuries in which gender and sexuality are depicted as playful and flexible.

The works depict a radical moment in Japanese history that often goes unacknowledged even today. As Asato Ikeda, a guest curator of the exhibition, told The New York Times: “Even though we have this rich tradition of gender, prints like these are not found in our textbooks. We don’t do these kinds of exhibitions in Japan.”

The Edo period was characterized by peace, economic growth, isolation from the West and a rigid social order. Within this era of tranquility and prosperity blossomed a renewed interest in art, entertainment and sex, all of which converged in cultural practices like Kabuki theater, red light–style pleasure districts and erotic prints known as “shunga.”

Given the strict hierarchies that divided class and age in real life, these realms opened up space for fantasies to play out and experimentation to flourish. The wild imaginings and the power plays they alluded to are visualized in the vivid woodblock prints that circulated for cheap throughout the two Edo centuries. Within them, older men and women make love to wakashu, pictured as flirtatious and desirable.

Upon first glance, wakashu appear like women, donning elaborate hairstyles and long-sleeved kimono robes, known as “furisodes.” Yet a shaved triangular patch toward the top of the head is the defining mark that identifies the alluring youth as wakashu. A sword peeking out of a samurai sash can also disclose their biological sex, as can their genitals, which occasionally appear in some of the more erotic prints. 

The images also depict cross-dressing in various forms ― women sex workers known as “haori-geisha” who dressed as wakashu to appeal to male clients aroused by masculinity, enacting a sort of drag within drag. Men also performed female roles on the Kabuki stage, where women were banned, as fluctuating actors known as “onnagata.”

The tradition of the wakashu died out around 1860, when Japan was infiltrated both militarily and culturally by the West and, as a result, broke with their more experimental traditions. Today, same-sex marriage is still not legal in Japan, although some cities do grant partnerships between LGBTQ people. Open attitudes regarding gender identity and sexual experimentation, however, are most evident in the stunning imagery crafted centuries ago, when gender was not conceived of as either binary or biological, but a fluctuating range of identities and performances, of pleasure and play.

“A Third Gender: Beautiful Youths in Japanese Prints” is on view through June 11 at New York’s Japan Society

type=type=RelatedArticlesblockTitle=Related… + articlesList=55db717ee4b08cd3359ce0d9,57053c0ae4b0a506064ddeab,56ec35bfe4b03a640a6a53d5

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.