Mom Shamers Went After Kelly Clarkson For Giving Her Daughter Nutella

Even Kelly Clarkson can’t escape the insidious phenomenon of mom-shaming.

On Sunday, the singer posted a video of her 2-year-old daughter, River Rose, trying Nutella for the first time.

”River’s first Nutella experience,” she wrote in the caption. “It should have been via crepe but toast was easier.”

The toddler’s reaction to tasting Nutella is pretty spot-on, as she breaks out into the cutest happy dance. 

Clarkson’s video has been viewed over three million times, and the most common response to River Rose’s reaction seems be “same!” But while most people thought it was adorable, many commenters had a real problem with the singer’s choice of snack for her daughter.

“There’s a lot of sugar in that,” commented one person. “Nutella is hella bad for you,” added another.

“Make your own @kellyclarkson Nutella is PACKED with sugars don’t make your kids blow up too,” wrote one commenter. Another implored Clarkson to check the ingredients list and not feed the “poison” to her child. “@kellyclarkson as a mom let me give you an advice,” she wrote.

Some commenters pointed to the recent reports suggesting palm oil ― an ingredient in Nutella ― causes cancer. The hazelnut spread maker however, asserts that its product is safe because the industrial process involves controlled temperatures to minimize carcinogenic contaminants.

“Yep. Start them out with cancer at an early age,” one person commented, while others echoed with, “Nutella is cancerous u know” and “Stop eating Nutella it’s been confirmed to give cancer.”

In addition to River Rose, Clarkson is mom to 11-month-old Remington aka Remy and stepmom to Seth and Savannah ― her husband Brandon Blackstock’s children from a previous marriage.

Clarkson, who hasn’t had time for shaming in the past, did not respond to the criticism.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

'Breaking Bad' Pop-Up Restaurant, Los Pollos Hermanos, Is Missing Just One Thing

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

A famous Wendy’s commercial once asked, “Where’s the beef?”

Well, we got no beef with Los Pollos Hermanos. Unfortunately, we got no chicken, either.

Where’s the chicken?

The Los Pollos pop-up that debuted at SXSW earlier this year reportedly didn’t serve chicken. Sadly, “employees” at the “Breaking Bad”-inspired restaurant in New York City also confirmed to The Huffington Post that there was no chicken up for grabs … only curly fries.

It’s a little disappointing considering the restaurant is called Los Pollos Hermanos, which literally translates to “The Chicken Brothers,” and boasts an elaborate menu of chicken delicacies. 

Luckily, the restaurant, which popped up in NYC on Sunday and Monday in honor of the “Better Call Saul” Season 3 premiere, has everything else.

Outside, the lines wrapped around Saul’s car:

There were random Heisenbergs spotted out front:

And once inside, it was like you stepped into the world of “Breaking Bad”: 

It’s not McDonald’s, but peeps were lovin’ it.

Video screens had Gus Fring (Giancarlo Esposito), franchise creator and secret drug lord, encouraging patrons to try the new curly fries. Despite Heisenberg’s disagreements with the aforementioned proprietor, clearly even he couldn’t resist.

And what the heck do they put on those curly fries? Fring doesn’t actually say in the promo video, but he guarantees you’ll like them. 

Whatever the recipe, that stuff’s addictive. And you can enjoy them with three different sauces, too. Stick to your meth-ods, dude.

Our final assessment: Yeah, Los Pollos Hermanos doesn’t have chicken, but no harm, no fowl.

See more pictures below.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

John Grisham Calls String Of Arkansas Executions A 'Spectacular Legal Train Wreck'

Best-selling author John Grisham on Monday issued a harsh rebuke of Arkansas’ plan to end a 12-year hiatus of the death penalty by executing seven men later this month. 

Gov. Asa Hutchinson (R) should “stop the execution madness in Arkansas,” he wrote in USA Today. 

The prisoners are slated for be killed two at a time between April 17 and April 27. Grisham, a former attorney and state lawmaker in Mississippi, called the plan “a spectacular legal train wreck.” 

An eighth man, Jason McGehee, was also originally slated to be killed during that time period. However, a federal judge blocked that execution because it was scheduled to fall within the window of the state’s mandatory clemency review timeline. 

“Indeed, no death-happy state has ever dreamed of eight kills in such a short time,” Grisham wrote. 

There is so much urgency to the execution schedule because the state’s supply of midazolam ― a controversial sedative that’s been blamed for botched executions in at least four states ― expires this month, according to Hutchinson. It’s unclear if Arkansas will be able to get more of the drug once it does.  

Why assume so many risks in the name of expediency? Even if Arkansas pulls it off, justice will lose.
John Grisham

Grisham’s arguments mirror those of legal analysts and human rights activists who have brought up a variety of concerns about the procedure, including the strain it puts on corrections personnel and potential problems with the drugs. 

Grisham mentions in his op-ed that two dozen former corrections officials and administrators recently sent a letter to Hutchinson, asking him to reconsider the hasty schedule on account of the “extraordinary and unnecessary stress and trauma” facing the corrections staff. 

“Managing seven or eight rapid executions will be a brutalizing experience, even if there are no surprises,” Grisham said.

He also blasted the state’s willingness to “arbitrarily violate its own policies and laws” regarding clemency in order to meet the frenzied schedule. Each of the men slated for execution will have one hour to make his case before the state clemency board, down from the typical two-hour allotment. They all also face a review process shorter than the 30 days that’s traditionally required. 

“An execution is the most serious act a government can undertake,” Grisham said. “Why assume so many risks in the name of expediency? Even if Arkansas pulls it off, justice will lose.”

Grisham, whose legal thrillers include The Firm and The Pelican Brief, is currently a board member of the Innocence Project, a nonprofit dedicated to using DNA evidence to exonerate wrongfully convicted people.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Martin O'Malley: Bernie Sanders Wouldn't Have Beaten Donald Trump

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

WASHINGTON ― Even if Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) had won last year’s Democratic presidential primary, he wouldn’t have defeated Donald Trump in the general election, says former Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley (D).

“I don’t believe so,” O’Malley speculated Friday on DC/BS, a political podcast hosted by Jon Allen and Peter Ogburn.

O’Malley was one of Sanders’ presidential primary challengers, and he didn’t get very far. His campaign fizzled out after the Iowa caucuses. The Huffington Post was there for his final event, when he stood on a chair in a cramped campaign office in Des Moines and urged the 100 or so people there for free pizza to help push his candidacy over the top.

If he had persevered and gone on to win the primary, O’Malley thinks he would have had a better shot at beating Trump for the presidency than Sanders or, if he had run, former Vice President Joe Biden.

“I think I would have won,” he said.

Worried we have seen the last of O’Malley as a presidential contender? Fear not!

“I might run for president in 2020,” he said. “I think it’s way too early for anybody to make that determination right now.”

Listen to the full podcast here:

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Edward Enninful Named First Black Editor Of British Vogue

For the first time ever, British Vogue has appointed a black man to be at the helm. 

Parent company Condé Nast announced Monday that Edward Enninful will be leaving his position as the creative and fashion director of W, an American magazine, to become editor-in-chief of the British fashion book.

Enninful is set to replace Alexandra Shulman and disrupt a 100-year history of white women holding the position, including the current American Vogue editor, Anna Wintour. The 45-year-old, who is openly gay, will also become the first non-white man to lead a mainstream women’s fashion magazine.

Enninful is one of six siblings and migrated to England from Ghana when he was young. He has always had a love for fashion and officially began his career in the industry at the age of 16, when he was recruited to model in the British magazine i-D.

Regram @mfa_london. #1991 @id_magazine @simonfoxton @jasonevansphotography xoxo

A post shared by Edward Enninful, OBE (@edward_enninful) on Jan 31, 2016 at 3:24pm PST

Three years later, Enninful went on to become i-D’s fashion editor, which made him one of the youngest to ever hold such a prestigious position. He worked there for nearly two decades before leaving to contribute to both the American and Italian editions of Vogue.

Enninful, who helped to style the models in Vogue Italia’s popular “Black Issue” in 2008, has been recognized for his efforts to diversify the fashion industry and has been outspoken about racism.

He will officially take on his new role on Aug. 1, and we can’t wait to see what he’ll do next. Congrats to him! 

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

'The Big Pug Theory' Is Destined To Be The Next Sitcom Hit

Now it isn’t just the autotrophs that began to drool.

Celebrity dog Doug the Pug visited the set of “The Big Bang Theory” and played the popular sitcom’s characters.

Ladies and gentlemen, we give you the “The Big Pug Theory.”

If Sheldon has issues with humans sitting in his spot, imagine how he would react to Doug.

H/T Tastefully Offensive

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

New Canadian Law Bans Mandatory High Heels At Work

Great news for people who need another reason to move to Canada. The province of British Columbia just passed a law banning mandatory high heels in the workplace.

British Columbia’s government announced Friday that it has deemed requirement of high heels unsafe based on the risk of injuries, as well as the damage that comes from prolonged wear.

“This change will let employers know that the most critical part of an employee’s footwear is that it is safe,” Shirley Bond, minister of jobs, tourism and skills training and minister responsible for labour, said in a release. The regulation “ensures that workplace footwear is of a design, construction and material that allows the worker to safely perform their work and ensures that employers cannot require footwear contrary to this standard.”

Under the new regulation, employers must consider specific safety factors when choosing mandatory footwear codes — factors such as uneven terrain, ankle protection and foot support, and tripping hazards. But besides protecting employees from health risks, the release also notes that British Columbia’s Human Rights Code already protects against gender-based discrimination, which can include enforcing a dress code based on gender. 

The news comes nearly a year after a photo of a Canadian woman’s bloody feet and accompanying story went viral. The woman was allegedly “berated” for changing into flats at her restaurant job, despite the fact that the heels she had been required to wear were making her feet bleed and causing one of her toenails to fall off. At the time, the restaurant in question told The Huffington Post its policy surrounding dress code had recently changed, making flats an acceptable option and nixing its requirement that heels be over 2.5 inches. 

Dress code regulation has come under scrutiny in other places around the world, too. In May 2016, a U.K.-based woman who was working as a receptionist was sent home for not wearing heels. The experience prompted her to start a petition that garnered over 150,000 signatures and was brought to Parliament.

The government concluded that “dress codes which require women to wear high heels for extended periods of time are damaging to their health and wellbeing in both the short and the long term in the U.K.,” but that there were “not currently enough disincentives to prevent employers breaching the law.” In short, while the government acknowledged the issues with enforcing dress code, the repercussions are not yet harsh enough to make companies stop using them. 

In the United States, there is some disparity on federal and local levels. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission states that  “an employer may establish a dress code which applies to all employees or employees within certain job categories,” with exceptions made for a person’s religion or disability.

The New York City Commission on Human Rights, on the other hand, announced new guidelines in December 2015, which say dress code enforcement based on gender “may be a violation of the law.”

It’s hard to believe that we’re still talking about whether or not a woman should be forced to wear certain shoes in the year 2017. But British Columbia’s news is at least a more comfortable step in the right direction. 

type=type=RelatedArticlesblockTitle=Related… + articlesList=57155a91e4b0060ccda41a5d,575b22e7e4b0ced23ca81ae7,564cb0f4e4b00b7997f8777d

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

One Of Today’s Most Popular Fonts Has A Wild, Centuries-Long History

For anyone who uses a word processor ― so, over a billion people, Microsoft estimates on its site ― a favorite font can be an identity marker as salient as an outfit or a hairstyle.

It can communicate formality or a more laid-back mood. Beyond that, it can illustrate the nuances of the user’s personality. For the twee, there’s Futura; for the old-fashioned, Times New Roman. And, for the history-loving, there’s Baskerville, a font that was created in the 18th century, and is still widely used today.

You might’ve seen a variation on the typeface adorning your favorite book or filling the pages of a poetry collection. Or, more likely, you’ve seen it as an option in the dropdown menu in Word, sandwiched between the sleek Arial and the goofy Comic Sans, the butt of typographical jokes.

With more elaborate finishing strokes (aka serifs) than Times New Roman, it’s readable but ornate, and therefore a popular option that designers use for mid-length texts, such as sections of poetry, book titles, old-fashioned-looking company logos and, occasionally, the interiors of the books themselves. 

Baskerville appears in a popular, classic edition of Ulysses, and the 1965 back cover of In Cold Blood. Today, due in part to the prevalence of handwritten fonts on book covers, it’s more likely to be found on the back cover or inside jacket of a new title, such as Nate Silver’s The Signal and the Noise. It can be found on movie posters, like the one for last year’s “Hidden Figures.” It’s the font used for Jeb Bush’s 2016 presidential campaign and the wordmark (in modified form) for the Canadian government. 

That’s a lot of visibility considering the range of fonts available today, but its widespread use is even more remarkable when you consider Baskerville’s long history, which began centuries before its birth.

The font dates back to the 1730s, when an English businessman named John Baskerville first began working on engravings for tombstones using a style of writing that would later resemble the lettering of his eponymous typeface. In the 1750s, Baskerville set out to design a thinner version of Caslon, the de facto typeface at the time. By 1757, he settled on a design he used to print an edition of Virgil’s work, and Baskerville was born.

At first, the font’s success overshadowed the use of Caslon, causing a rift between the two designs ― the practical stalwart and the elegant alternative. 

“Many people don’t realize that the typeface generated a very mixed reaction when it first appeared,” designer and author of Let’s Talk Type: An Essential Lexicon of Type Terms Tony Seddon told The Huffington Post.

“In England [Baskerville] was vilified by many of his fellow printers,” he added. “It’s likely that this was largely down to professional jealousy as Baskerville was achieving a quality that others couldn’t recreate, but his printed work was also criticized at the time as too thin and narrow and hurtful to the eye.”

In the United States, however, Baskerville and his design had some notable admirers, namely Benjamin Franklin, who wrote a letter to the typeface’s creator himself. Franklin recounts a conversation he had with a so-called typeface “connoisseur,” who believed, as Seddon noted, that Baskerville was too difficult to read.

“I endeavored to support your character against the charge,” Franklin wrote to Baskerville before launching into an anecdote about a prank that he pulled on the gentleman in question. Franklin presented the man with text written in that earlier, thicker font, Caslon, but lied and said it was written in Baskerville, and asked the man to point out his precise criticism. The man complied, proving to Franklin that anti-Baskerville sentiments were hogwash.

Still, Seddon says Baskerville fell out of favor for decades before regaining popularity again around 1917, when a designer and eventual printing adviser to Cambridge University Press and Harvard University Press bought Baskerville’s old typeface molds and used them to distribute printed materials in America.

Today, Baskerville is available on both PCs and Macs, solidifying it as a popular font. Just as different letterpresses offered slightly tweaked variations of the original font, there are several digital varieties of the font, too; some are crisper, with thinner downstrokes, while others are heftier, and easier to read for several pages. 

“I think its enduring appeal with professional designers is largely down to the fact that it’s got a certain flair and a handmade character,” Seddon said. “It was designed as a book face and it still excels at that today ― at least in the right kind of book anyway. Otherwise it’s good for invoking an historical feel to text without coming across as too stuffy.”

Designer and co-founder of Emigre Fonts Zuzana Licko agrees about the typeface’s versatility. In fact, she has such an affection for Baskerville that she designed her own typeface riffing on its curves and general look.

“Baskerville was one of my go-to typefaces in the early ‘80s when I used to order photo typesetting, which seems like another lifetime by now,” Licko told HuffPost. “I was intrigued by the variety of different Baskerville versions offered by the various type manufacturers, and less than two decades later, designing my own interpretation became possible with the personal computer.”

Struck by the warmth and humanity of the early versions of the typeface, Licko wanted to combine the look of various letterpress versions of Baskerville with her own impressions and feelings upon first seeing the typeface.

The result was Mrs. Eaves, a font that she named after Sarah Eaves, a woman who worked closely with Baskerville back in the 1700s. Married with five children, Eaves worked as Baskerville’s housekeeper and, after her husband left her, his lover. The two were married after Eaves’ husband’s death and worked together on typesetting before that.

“I thought it would be misleading to call my design Baskerville, as it had gotten too far away from what a user might expect from a font named Baskerville. So, instead, I sought to find a name that would make reference to Baskerville, and in reading about his life, I came across Sarah Eaves, aka Mrs. Eaves, and thought that was a lovely sounding name,” Licko said. 

She describes her font as full and able to occupy space, but in a delicate way.

“This gives the reader some room to rest and contemplate, making Mrs. Eaves ideal for short texts, including poetry,” Licko said. “Mrs. Eaves loves to adorn book covers and relishes short blurbs on the flaps and backs of dust covers. Trips to bookstores are always a treat for me as I find Mrs. Eaves staring out at me from dozens of book covers in the most elegant compositions, each time surprising me with her many talents.” 

Salman Rushdie’s Haroun and the Sea of Stories may be among the most popular titles expressed by Mrs. Eaves, which also appears on a Radiohead album cover and the original logo for music streaming provider Pandora.

So, when you next notice a typeface gracing the cover of your favorite book or album, you might consider that the fonts tell stories themselves. That the thin lines might’ve been praised by a Founding Father, and the rounded lettering might’ve been the handiwork of a later memorialized mistress.

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

10 Ways Siblings Make You A Happier, Healthier And Better Person

Life with a sibling can be pretty darn great. Seriously.

Sure, there are times when you bicker or instances when it seems like your parents favor one of you over the other (blame your mom and dad for that one). But overall, brothers and sisters can come with some major wellness perks ― and that’s something to celebrate.

In honor of National Sibling Day, we rounded up all the ways your siblings can make you a happier, healthier and all-around better human being. Take a look at them below, then make sure to thank your siblings today (and remind them they better thank you, too).

1. Siblings can make you more joyful later in life.

The benefits of having a brother or sister stem beyond your younger years. Research shows that a close bond with a sibling during middle and old age is correlated with positive mood and overall health. A supportive relationship with a sibling also eased loneliness later in life. 

2. Looking at old photos of you together can boost optimism.

Go on and grab those old family albums. Studies suggest that nostalgia ― like flipping through photos of you and your brothers and sisters growing up ― can boost feelings of optimism and have a positive effect on your emotions. Sounds like a pretty good way to celebrate National Siblings Day.

3. A sister could boost your mental health.

Let’s hear it for the women of the family. A study out of Brigham Young University found that a loving relationship with a sister ― either older or younger ― protects you from feeling lonely, guilty, self-conscious or fearful in your adolescent years.

4. Those who grow up as youngest kids may be funnier and more adventurous.

Leave it to the youngest ones to keep you in stitches. A 2015 survey found that youngest siblings are more likely to consider themselves the ones with better humor, whereas older brothers and sisters are more likely to view themselves as more serious. Research also suggests younger kids may be more exploratory and open to experiences.

5. Eldest siblings may naturally grow to be more responsible.

Firstborns have got the whole dependability thing down pat. Eldest siblings are often seen as more obedient and responsible. They also tend to focus more on family values and loyalty, Jeffrey Kluger, author of The Sibling Effect: What the Bonds Among Brothers and Sisters Reveal About Us, told NPR. So, either you’re able to totally count on your older sibling or you’re the eldest and you’ve likely learned to be reliable. Win-win.

6. Middle siblings often learn to be good peacekeepers.

Studies conducted on families and birth order suggest that middle kids may be the ones who are good at compromise and negotiating. A 2010 review of research also found that middle children are commonly more sociable and good at relating to people who are both older and younger. Makes perfect sense.

7. Having a brother or sister could make you physically healthier.

Our close connections have the biggest influence on our healthy habits. Data from the 2011 Edelman Health Barometer global survey suggests that 46 percent of people polled across 12 countries believe their friends and family have the biggest impact on their lifestyle choices, including staying active. 

8. Hanging out with them may reduce stress.

That is, if you consider your sibling your best friend. Research shows spending time with a loved one can help beat stress, and experts say siblings especially can help protect you from the negative effects of stress when you’re a kid. Maybe a day out shopping with your sis is just what you need.

9. Siblings may help you live longer.

It pays to have a close bond. Strong social ties ― like bonds you could form with your siblings ― are linked to better longevity. Research shows that people with poor connections have a higher risk of dying (about 7.5 years earlier on average) than those who have tight bonds with others. This could be because your family and friends encourage you to take better care of yourself and serve as support when your physical or mental health is at risk, according to Time. Sounds like a good reason to put your siblings on speed dial.

10. Declaring your appreciation for them will feel good.

For you and for them. Research shows acts of kindness (in this case, sharing your gratitude) can make you happier, as well as make the person on the receiving end happier.

So go on, post those pictures and tributes for National Siblings Day. It’s the least you all can do, right?

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Donald Trump Loves Signing Things

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.