UK Ebook Sales Experience A Drop

When the concept of ebooks first surfaced, it seemed like the natural progression of things and it also felt like maybe physical printed books were doomed to go the way of the dinosaur. After all ebooks tend to be cheaper, more accessible, more convenient, not to mention green since it doesn’t require paper or inks to be made.

Unfortunately it doesn’t really seem that way, or maybe we’re not quite there yet because according to a report from The Guardian, it seems the ebook sales in the UK have dropped. The report claims that consumer ebooks have seen a decline in sales of 17% last year, making it the lowest level in ebook sales since 2011.

According to Stephen Lotinga, chief executive of the Publishers Association, he blames it on screen fatigue. Lotinga was quoted as saying, “I wouldn’t say that the ebook dream is over but people are clearly making decisions on when they want to spend time with their screens. There is generally a sense that people are now getting screen tiredness, or fatigue, from so many devices being used, watched or looked at in their week. [Printed] books provide an opportunity to step away from that.”

Interestingly enough, some are saying that the rise in larger smartphone displays could be the reason why ebook sales are on the decline. Apparently the larger displays led to ereaders such as the Kindle losing its popularity, but then consumers found out that reading ebooks on smartphone displays or tablets isn’t as conducive to reading and have turned to printed books as a result.

UK Ebook Sales Experience A Drop , original content from Ubergizmo. Read our Copyrights and terms of use.

Update To Google Trips Makes It Easier To Plan Your Holiday

One of the nifty features we love about Inbox by Gmail is that it can automatically sort your emails for you and bundle them together. For example if you booked flights and a hotel to a particular destination, the platform is smart enough to bundle it all together under a single trip for easier access.

However if you’d rather not keep opening your email, not to worry as Google also has a separate app in the form of Google Trips, and the good news for users is that Google has recently made an update to the app that will make it easier for users to plan and manage their next holiday.

For starters in addition to being able to capture flight information from your Gmail inbox, Trips can now add bus and train tickets to your itinerary as well. Users can also enter details manually in case the information was not registered or made at the last minute. The app will also now let users share their reservations straight from the app to email, so you can plan a trip and then share the information with friends or family members who are part of it as well.

Users will also be able to download information about a place before they go so that in the event there is no internet, not to worry as they’ll be covered. The update is live so head on over to the iTunes App Store or Google Play for the download.

Update To Google Trips Makes It Easier To Plan Your Holiday , original content from Ubergizmo. Read our Copyrights and terms of use.

Google Posts Dates Of When Support Will End For Nexus/Pixel Devices

While a two-year old smartphone isn’t exactly what you would consider “old” in terms of usability and features, as far as OEMs are concerned, such devices are typically viewed as “ancient” and it isn’t often that we see OEMs support devices that are older than two years. Google is no different but the good news is that at least Pixel/Nexus owners have an expiry date to look forward to.

Google has recently published updated timeframes on its website in which they indicate when support and updates for its Pixel and Nexus devices will end. Starting with the Nexus, owners of the Nexus 6P and Nexus 5X can expect that Android version updates will no longer be guaranteed after September 2017, and that there will also be no guaranteed security patch updates after September 2018.

As for the Pixel and Pixel XL, Google says that there will be no guaranteed Android version updates after October 2018, and no guaranteed security patches after October 2019. Note that Google’s wording says that there is no guaranteed updates, meaning that while there is a chance that the Pixel and Pixel XL could see an update to 2019’s Android, it is not a guarantee that it will.

We suppose this is normal especially given the nature of carrier contract lengths in which users are usually given options to upgrade to a newer handset, sometimes even after the first year.

Google Posts Dates Of When Support Will End For Nexus/Pixel Devices , original content from Ubergizmo. Read our Copyrights and terms of use.

Acer Aspire U27 AiO and Switch 5 2-in-1 feature a liquid cooling system

Among the gear Acer unveiled today comes a pair of computing products notable for how they’re kept cool. The Acer Aspire U27 all-in-one desktop PC and the 2-in-1 convertible Switch 5 are both equipped with LiquidLoop, a liquid cooling system. The Switch 5 is Acer’s first 2-in-1 laptop that features its LiquidLoop offering; it, as with the Aspire all-in-one, are … Continue reading

We Know How To Curb Epidemics. Can Alzheimer's Be Next?

I travel a lot, which means I spend much of my time in airports waiting to catch a flight. I use most of that time to work or catch up on email, but sometimes, when it’s really early in the morning or really late at night, I just sit at the gate and watch the people go by. And not too long ago I saw something that broke my heart.

It was a couple my age, maybe a few years older. They were making their way to the gate. They were ordinary-looking folks, but as I looked at them closely I noticed that something wasn’t quite right. The man seemed confused, disoriented, distressed. The woman seemed stricken, sad. She was holding his hand, leading him to a chair. He was asking her questions, softly at first and then more and more loudly. She was speaking softly, begging him to calm down. She kept telling him again and again where they were going and why. Little of it seemed to make sense to the man, though, and eventually he gave up, sat down, and closed his eyes. The woman sat down next to him. Tears were rolling down her eyes.

As a physician who has seen many similar cases, it wasn’t too hard for me to figure out what was going on. It was most likely Alzheimer’s, robbing this relatively young man of his memory, his mind, and his life. And it was taking a great toll on his wife, who was no longer just partner and spouse but caregiver as well.

According to the Alzheimer Association, an American develops the disease every 66 seconds, which means that while we have five million Alzheimer’s patients now, we may have as many as 16 million by 2050. Last year, families of patients spent an estimated 18.2 billion hours caring for their afflicted loved ones, care valued at $230 billion. By 2050, the toll care for Alzheimer’s patients takes on the economy may be as high as $1 trillion. It’s clear, then, that we’re looking at a crisis.

Can we stop this disease? Can we help that man I saw at the airport, and his family, and the millions who suffer from the same terrible disease? Recent scientific and medical history suggests that we can. When the AIDS epidemic first broke out, not that long ago, the virus was considered a death sentence. Today, the disease is a manageable condition, a breakthrough that was achieved by bringing together smart people from a wide array of disciplines and starting conversations that, we hope, will lead to innovations in research and to new and life-saving discoveries.

But before we can begin, we need to know exactly what it is we’re trying to do. What is brain health? How do we propose to study it? Let’s begin with the term itself, brain health. Because our brains and our bodies work together to keep us healthy, we cannot really talk of brain health without talking of body health and vice versa. We already know about how sleep, say, impacts our ability to learn, about how emotional pain and physical pain rely on the same exact regions in our brain, or about how our brains use prior knowledge and experiences to make future predictions. The more we study the brain, the more we learn about the factors impacting our health, and the better we can be about disease detection, intervention, and prevention.

Here, then, is our first marching order: We ought to be infinitely curious, not just about the narrow confines of our highly specialized research but about anything and everything that may give us some clue and some insight into the ways our bodies and our brains work in tandem. There’s no better way to do this than collaboration, and I’ve been very fortunate, in my own career, to enjoy some of the most wonderful partnerships I could imagine. A few years ago, for example, when working to help a young man named Ian with quadriplegia become the first person in history to regain motion in his arms, I had the pleasure of partnering with Battelle, an organization I had not previously worked with even though their headquarters are less than half a mile down the road from my office here in Columbus. Together, our teams helped Ian control his arms with his mind, using a brain implant and a neuro-sleeve that allowed his brain to bypass the damaged neural circuitry and communicate directly with his muscles. I hope that similar partnerships will be struck here this weekend.

And when I say “partnerships,” I mean it in the broadest sense possible. A few weeks ago, the popular press was giddily reporting that Elon Musk, America’s favorite billionaire inventor and the man behind the Tesla electric car and behind SpaceX, was entering the field of brain research to focus on brain-computer interaction. Similar interest is taking place by other the Silicon Valley giants and other major companies worldwide. We welcome the Silicon valley giants and what they bring to the table and we look forward to the energy, the skills, the brilliance, and the resources that Elon Musk and others will bring forward —such audacious and groundbreaking research isn’t the future but very much the present in Ohio and the Midwest, and we look forward to the innovators like Musk joining us in the heartland, and inviting private enterprise, academia, government, and the non-profit world to all come together and come to task.

The challenges that face us are greater than any one disease. They include anything from addiction to depression to the sinking understanding those of us who study it have that the human brain is struggling to process the torrent of cognitive stimuli it’s receiving anywhere from non-stop cable news to social media to a plethora of screens and smart devices. To grapple with these challenges, we need the scientific equivalent of the Avengers, a heroic team of committed scientists, each with her or his own outlook and expertise. If we work together, maybe the next time we see a person suffering from some previously incurable brain condition, we could successfully do what we’ve dedicated our lives to doing and offer them a cure and some hope.

This piece is part of a special brain health initiative curated by Dr. Ali Rezai, Director of Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center’s Stanley D. and Joan H. Ross Center for Brain Health and Performance. For more, visit The Huffington Post’s Brain Health page.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

If You Love Your Pet, Think Twice Before Checking Them As Airplane Cargo

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

Flying with pets can be hectic for owners and animals alike. Most airlines allow some small animals in the cabin, while those that transport larger dogs and cats require them to fly as cargo, usually under the cabin in a pressurized hold.

The latter isn’t always a paw-sitive experience. This week, a giant rabbit was found dead after a United Airlines flight from London to Chicago, according to its owner. The rabbit’s death is the latest awful mishap for United, with headlines noting it leads passenger airlines with the most animal deaths; there have been 53 over the last five years.

But animals face danger in the air no matter the carrier: From 2010 to 2012, Delta saw the highest number of pet fatalities with 41, and Alaska Airlines reported 12 pet deaths between 2012 and 2014, which high when taking into account their relatively low passenger traffic compared to airlines like United and Delta. 

Here’s what you need to know to decide if and how to fly a pet. 

How common is it for pets to die or suffer injury in flight?

Between 2012 and 2016, an average of 26 pets died on commercial flights every year, according to Department of Transportation statistics obtained by HuffPost. In 2016, there were a total of 26 deaths and 22 injuries among pet passengers. Injuries came mostly from animals biting or scratching at kennels while they traveled, and death reports note animals breathing heavily, collapsing or simply being “discovered deceased” upon landing. The majority of post-mortem exam results cite heart failure as the cause of death.

“It’s hard to say” exactly what causes pets to die during or immediately after flights, as every case is different, said Inga Fricke, director of pet retention programs at The Humane Society of the United States. There is, however, a higher overall risk for brachycephalic breeds like bulldogs and pugs, whose “short nasal passages leave them especially vulnerable to oxygen deprivation and heat stroke,” she said.

Where do pets go when they’re checked as cargo?

They’re loaded in kennels and stowed in the cargo area below the cabin. Pets are usually on the same flight as their owners, but sometimes scheduling will require pets to fly on different planes, a Delta representative told HuffPost. Though the cargo hold is pressurized, it’s often dark and noisy, with fluctuating temperatures and air pressure. 

What’s it like in there?

Most airlines have time and temperature limits for transporting warm-blooded pets: American Airlines, for example, doesn’t allow pet travel if temperatures are above 85 or below 45 degrees Fahrenheit at any point in the itinerary. Delta’s minimum is 10 degrees Fahrenheit, and Alaska won’t fly pets if it’s extremely hot or cold, a spokeswoman confirmed to HuffPost. Some more sensitive breeds, like bulldogs and pugs, come with more restrictions: On United, these breeds can’t fly at all during summer months.

Pets are typically banned on flights longer than 12 hours

Is this safe? Should I fly with my pet?

It’s best to consider all other options first, according to Fricke.

“Putting pets in cargo areas should be avoided whenever possible,” she said. “Once that animal is out of your control, there are so many risks it can be exposed to that it’s just not worth it.” 

So far, it’s unknown what killed the giant rabbit that flew United. But experts say that airplane-related animal deaths can typically be attributed to the stress from waiting on loading ramps, coupled with extreme temperature and pressure changes on the tarmac and in the cargo hold, National Geographic reports.

The Humane Society recommends driving with your pet or leaving it behind during vacations. If you must fly with a pet, bring it in the cabin with you if possible, or do your homework and choose a trusted pet shipping service for larger cats and dogs. If you absolutely must check your pet as cargo, introduce it to its travel kennel a few weeks before the trip, notify cabin crew that your pet is flying as cargo and avoid giving it any sedatives before the journey, as they can backfire at high altitudes.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Donald Trump Promised Ten Of These Things, Guess Which One He Actually Did

Like what you read below? Sign up for HUFFPOST HILL and get a cheeky dose of political news every evening!

Today is Take Your Child to Work Day, an annual tradition where working men and women let their children leverage their parents’ political and business connections to avoid paying Chinese import tariffs on their line of shoddy jeggings. A con artist is operating in Mar-a-Lago and people are shocked to learn it’s someone other than the president. And “Sheeple” has been added to the dictionary, but if you aren’t asking why “chemtrail” wasn’t also added, then wake up sheeple. This is HUFFPOST HILL for Thursday, April 27th, 2017:

IF YOU LIKE YOUR HEALTH CARE…THE FREEDOM CAUCUS MIGHT REALLY RUIN YOUR WEEK – Laura Barrón-López: “House Democrats will vote against a short-term spending bill to keep the government open if Republicans try to move on a bill to repeal Obamacare this week. House Minority Whip Steny Hoyer (D-Md.) said that if Republicans try a second time to rush their latest bill to repeal the Affordable Care Act out the door, they will have to pass the one-week continuing resolution without Democratic votes…. The move by Democrats is a big threat as Republican leaders know they will likely need Democratic votes to pass the short-term resolution. If Congress fails to pass the stop gap measure, the government will shut down Friday at midnight…. If Republicans go forward with a vote on their health care bill, they’ll be putting a ‘tattoo on their forehead,’ Pelosi said, indicating they will likely pay a political price later. ‘The minute they cast that vote they are putting doo-doo on their shoe,’ she said.” [HuffPost]

Yeah, but that health care vote’s probably not happening anyway.

Don’t forget Trump is still threatening to destroy the health insurance market! “Many people in the insurance industry believe that if the government doesn’t fund this and doesn’t pay the insurance plans, that they will have breached their contract with the insurance plans, and this could result in millions of Americans losing their insurance coverage this year.” [HuffPost’s Jeffrey Young]

ART OF THE (ARE YOU FOR REAL?) – World’s worst kabuki theater. Arthur Delaney and Daniel Marans: “President Donald Trump said Thursday that he was on the verge of withdrawing the United States from the North American Free Trade Agreement until the leaders of Mexico and Canada talked him out of it. ‘I was going to terminate NAFTA as of two or three days from now,’ Trump said at the White House. But then, Trump said, he got phone calls from the leaders of Canada and Mexico, two men he likes very much. ‘They called me and they said, rather than terminating NAFTA, could you please renegotiate?’ Trump said. ‘I respect their countries very much. The relationship is very special and I said I will hold on the termination, let’s see if we can make it a fair deal.’” [HuffPost]

POTUS IS A GIANT BABY – Josh Dawsey, Shane Goldmacher and Alex Isenstadt: “The 70-year-old leader of the free world sat behind his desk in the Oval Office last Friday afternoon, doing what he’s done for years: selling himself. His 100th day in office was approaching, and Trump was eager to reshape the hardening narrative of a White House veering off course. So he took it upon himself to explain that his presidency was actually on track, inviting a pair of POLITICO reporters into the Oval Office for an impromptu meeting…. It was classic Trump: Confident, hyperbolic and insistent on asserting control. But interviews with nearly two dozen aides, allies, and others close to the president paint a different picture — one of a White House on a collision course between Trump’s fixed habits and his growing realization that this job is harder than he imagined when he won the election on Nov. 8.” [Politico]

Well-oiled machine. “For a few brief moments Thursday afternoon, it appeared as though the White House might be targeting your 401(k)s. Asked whether deductions for retirement savings would remain intact in its new tax reform package, White House press secretary Sean Spicer seemed to say no. ‘The current plan right now protects both charitable giving and mortgage interest, and that’s it,’ Spicer said, conspicuously leaving out those retirement savings…. It turns out the White House isn’t going to actually do this.” [WaPo’s Aaron Blake]

Like HuffPost Hill? Then order Eliot’s book, The Beltway Bible: A Totally Serious A-Z Guide To Our No-Good, Corrupt, Incompetent, Terrible, Depressing, and Sometimes Hilarious Government

Does somebody keep forwarding you this newsletter? Get your own copy. It’s free! Sign up here. Send tips/stories/photos/events/fundraisers/job movement/juicy miscellanea to eliot@huffingtonpost.com. Follow us on Twitter – @HuffPostHill

MICHAEL FLYNN AND THE BAD JUDGEMENTS WOULD BE A GREAT BAND NAME – Like, for a really stellar Nick Cave cover group. Willa Frej: “President Donald Trump’s former national security adviser, Michael Flynn, failed to heed warnings from the Pentagon about accepting foreign funds for a trip to Russia in 2015, the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee announced Thursday. The Department of Defense sent classified documents to committee chairman Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah), said ranking member Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-Md.) at a news conference on Thursday. One of them, which is being prepared for public release, is a letter from the Defense Intelligence Agency to Flynn. ‘This letter explicitly warned General Flynn, as he entered retirement, that the Constitution prohibited him from accepting any foreign government payments without advance permission,’ Cummings said. ‘DIA did not locate any records of Lieutenant General Flynn seeking permission or approval for the receipt of money from a foreign source.’ But Flynn did accept the funds from Kremlin-backed news agency RT and failed to disclose them when he applied for a security clearance last year, Cummings and Chaffetz said Tuesday. He may have broken federal law.” [HuffPost]

Obama derangement syndrome proving incurable. “Sean Spicer, who blamed Barack Obama’s White House on Thursday for signing off on Flynn’s security clearance. ‘[General Flynn’s] clearance was last reissued by the Obama administration in 2016 with full knowledge of his activities that occurred in 2015,’ Spicer said during Thursday’s press briefing, responding to a question about Flynn possibly breaking federal law by accepting foreign funds for a trip to Russia in 2015.” [HuffPost’s Ryan Grenoble]

FRAUDSTER OPERATING IN MAR-A-LAGO – It’s funny how much we lost it over Michaele Salahi back in the day because this whole administration is just a never ending sequence of Michaele Salahis. Tarini Parti: “An admitted fraudster who owes hundreds of thousands of dollars to his victims has had access to President Donald Trump through his wife, who is the guest reception manager of Mar-a-Lago, the Winter White House. Heather Rinkus is such a familiar figure at Mar-a-Lago that senior administration officials fondly call her the club’s ‘house mother.’ Her husband, Ari, is often on hand, too. There he was in February, waiting to greet President Trump in the special access area on the tarmac of Palm Beach International Airport, a few yards away from Air Force One. But it wasn’t that long ago that Ari, whose real name is Anthony Donald Rinkus, pleaded guilty in federal court to felony wire fraud for a complex financial con job. That guilty plea came on the heels of a previous one in state court for conducting a car-theft ring.” [BuzzFeed]

WARREN CAUTIOUSLY CRITICIZES OBAMA FOR WALL STREET SPEECH – Then again, you don’t want to too sharply criticize the guy who will give day two of your 2020 nominating convention pretty good ratings. Victoria McGrane: “Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren gently criticized former president Barack Obama Thursday for his decision to accept $400,000 from a Wall Street firm to speak at a health care conference this fall. Warren was asked about the controversy during an interview about her new book on the SiriusXM radio show, ‘Alter Family Politics.’  ‘I was troubled by that,’ she said. That was the extent of her comments aimed directly at Obama. She quickly launched into a broader discussion of her views of the corrupting influence of money in Washington.” [Boston Globe]

Looks like Obama gave another one of those $400K speeches.

FIX THE DEBT SUDDENLY NOT TOO CONCERNED ABOUT FIXING THE DEBT – It’s like if Social Security Works changed its name to “Social Security: A Little Uneven At Points.” Ben Walsh, Alexander Kaufman and Emily Peck: “HuffPost asked every single member of Fix the Debt’s CEO council for a response to the president’s tax outline, and as of press time, not a single one of the executives denounced it. Why won’t executives who want less government debt condemn a proposal that dramatically increases government debt? Most of the executives on Fix the Debt’s CEO council either declined to comment or did not respond to HuffPost’s requests. But the executives who were willing to go on the record are pretty clear-cut about what is going on: It’s a corporate tax cut, so they think it’s good. For instance, a Deere & Company spokesman said on behalf of CEO Samuel Allen that the company ‘supports efforts to improve the corporate tax code to make U.S. business and investment more competitive in today’s global marketplace.’ That’s a not-even-well-disguised way of saying ‘it’s a tax cut, so it’s good.’” [HuffPost]

About Trump’s middle-class tax cut…

EAST WING STILL PRETTY EMPTY – Marina Fang: “Nearly 100 days into President Donald Trump’s administration, first lady Melania Trump has been reluctant to embrace her new role, and it’s unclear how she will define what can be a somewhat nebulous, arcane and sexist position…. Trump hired a communications director only a month ago. Leaving the key post unfilled for the first two months of her husband’s administration was particularly glaring, [author Kate Andersen] Brower said. Without someone to coordinate her message, Trump remains mostly unknown to the public, generating further speculation about her.” [HuffPost]

DAMN, THOSE ARE SOME STRONG NUGS – Sebastian Murdock: “As North Korea continues to threaten the West with a nuclear attack, U.S. Rep. Brad Sherman (D-Calif.) suggested the isolationist nation could simply smuggle in a nuke through a ‘bale of marijuana.’ Sherman raised the issue Wednesday afternoon, when the entire U.S. Senate was called to a White House briefing on North Korea…. Sherman said at the briefing, and again in a tweet, that North Korea ‘could smuggle nuke into U.S. rather than use ICBM [intercontinental ballistic missiles]. Could smuggle inside a bale of marijuana.’” [HuffPost]

CHECKING IN WITH THE ALWAYS EXCITING WORLD OF FAR-RIGHT THOUGHT This little gem from Erick Erickson takes hate-crime apologism — and who knew that was still a thing?!? — to tremendous new heights: “You know, I’m really damn tired of all the people running around making other people extremely uncomfortable then screaming about their rights and privileges when called out. If you want to go around making people uncomfortable, you’ve got the problem, not the rest of us. It all starts with Mike Enzi who has enraged the BLT&GQ community by declaring a simple fact. If a guy walks into a bar in Wyoming, he’s probably going to get punched. Enzi said the person would deserve it, which he apologized for, and the guy would not deserve it. But it is probably going to happen and yes, the dude wearing the tutu shoulders some of the responsibility. He should have known better. And spare me the tirade about Matthew Shepherd.” [The Resurgent]

BECAUSE YOU’VE READ THIS FAR – Here’s a puppy trying to make sense of a garden hose.

ET’S FAKE GREEN CARD FINALLY GOING TO CATCH UP TO HIM – This is top-notch trolling. Avalon Zoppo: “Aliens are here and up to mischief — if the prank calls to a newly established government hotline are to be believed. Reports of space aliens and UFOs may have tied up lines at Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s newly launched office for victims following a frenzied Twitter campaign on Wednesday. The VOICE hotline, established on Wednesday through an executive order, aims to provide public information and resources to the victims of crimes committed by undocumented immigrants.” [NBC News]

COMFORT FOOD

– How human life expectancy would be impacted if people didn’t die from natural causes.

– How to make the boeuf bourguignon from “Julie and Julia.” 

– A deep dive into dog fashion.

TWITTERAMA 

Got something to add? Send tips/quotes/stories/photos/events/fundraisers/job movement/juicy miscellanea to Eliot Nelson (eliot@huffingtonpost.com)

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Senate Confirms Trump’s Labor Secretary

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

WASHINGTON ― The Senate confirmed Alexander Acosta to be the next labor secretary on Thursday, filling an important but long-vacant role in President Donald Trump’s Cabinet.

Lawmakers voted 60-38 in favor of Acosta’s nomination, with all Republicans and a handful of Democrats supporting the law school dean and former official in the George W. Bush administration. The son of Cuban immigrants, Acosta will be the first Latino to occupy one of Trump’s Cabinet posts.

He will come to Washington to lead an agency in flux. Trump has signaled that he wants to dramatically reduce the budget at the Labor Department, which is tasked with enforcing the nation’s labor laws and administering federal jobs training programs. The White House clearly envisions a more limited role for the agency in the U.S. economy, having repealed or stalled several labor regulations issued by Barack Obama.

While Democrats and labor groups brace for a more business-friendly Labor Department, Acosta, a former prosecutor, said in his March confirmation hearing that he was committed to enforcing wage and safety laws on behalf of workers. “Helping Americans find good jobs ― safe jobs ― should not be a partisan issue,” he told senators.

And yet Acosta made clear he intends to carry out Trump’s agenda as it relates to labor issues, saying he would honor the White House’s order to review all regulations currently on the books for potential repeal. He also indicated he’s not a fan of Obama’s significant overtime reforms, which would extend new wage protections to millions of salaried workers but are currently tied up in court.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) made her case against Acosta’s confirmation on the Senate floor Wednesday. Warren chided Acosta for dodging her questions on issues like the silica rule, which would further limit the amount of cancer-causing dust that employers can expose construction workers to. Although that rule is projected to save 600 lives per year, the Trump administration has delayed enforcing it. Acosta made clear he would follow the administration’s orders on that.

“Mr. Acosta has had multiple opportunities in the more than two months since he was nominated for this position to demonstrate that he would stand up for workers,” Warren said. “Time after time, he has refused.”

Whatever concerns liberals have with Acosta, he is a vastly more palatable choice to them than Trump’s original labor nominee, Andrew Puzder, the former chief executive of CKE Restaurants. Puzder led the Hardee’s and Carl’s Jr. burger chains and was a sharp critic of a $15 minimum wage and more generous overtime rules. His nomination collapsed in February amid a fierce campaign by Democrats and labor groups, leading Trump to the safer choice of Acosta.

Acosta is currently dean of the law school at Florida International University. He’s been through the confirmation ringer before, having been a member of the National Labor Relations Board, which referees disputes between unions and employers. He also headed the Civil Rights Division at the Bush Justice Department, which led to perhaps the blackest mark on his government record. An inspector general report found that officials at the division had politicized hiring while Acosta led it.

“It happened on my watch,” he acknowledged during his hearing. “It should not have occurred.”

While many of Trump’s Cabinet members are hostile to their agency’s very missions, there’s nothing in Acosta’s past to suggest he wants to dismantle the department he will lead. That said, labor groups are not expecting him to be an ally. When he sat on the labor board, Acosta frequently sided with employers over unions, though former Democratic colleagues say he does have an independent streak.

The Labor Department took on a central role in the Obama administration, taking the lead on some of the White House’s most consequential reforms, such as the overtime regulations that are now in limbo. That role will be greatly reduced in the Trump era, with a White House that wants to undo the administrative state.

The agency’s core responsibilities, such as investigating minimum wage violations, fall on career civil servants and will continue as usual. But they may be given fewer resources, and there have already been signs that enforcement may be less aggressive under Trump. The Labor Department has all but stopped issuing press releases when employers are caught endangering workers, which was a major deterrent tactic during the Obama years.

It remains to be seen what Trump and Acosta will do regarding overtime. Obama tried to change the rules so that more salaried workers are guaranteed time-and-a-half pay when they work more than 40 hours in a week. His changes would have brought overtime protections to an estimated 4.2 million additional workers.

During his hearing, Acosta said Obama’s change may have been too drastic, suggesting he would pare it back to please employers. “We now see an update [Obama’s] that is a very large revision,” he told Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.). “Something that needs to be considered is the impact it has on the economy.”

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Head Of Uber's Self-Driving Car Effort Steps Down

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

Anthony Levandowski, the head of Uber’s self-driving car unit once described by CEO Travis Kalanick as his “brother from another mother,” is stepping down from his position for a different role at the company.

Levandowski’s new job will remain in Uber’s Advanced Technologies Group, which researches self-driving technology. But he will no longer be involved in a key technology that allows autonomous vehicles to navigate, a company spokesperson told HuffPost. Eric Meyhofer, an Uber engineer and co-founder of Carnegie Robotics, will take over the division, Uber said.

The shift comes as a potentially devastating lawsuit against Uber involving Levandowski heads toward trial. The suit, filed by self-driving car rival Waymo, accuses former employee Levandowski of stealing trade secrets. 

Levandowski played a key role in Google’s self-driving car program, later spun off into Waymo. Central to the lawsuit is the design of a circuit board for an essential technology called LiDAR, which helps driverless cars map their surroundings.

Waymo claims Levandowski brought that circuit board design with him to Uber, giving the company a critical ― and illegal ― advantage. Uber has dismissed the claim.

In an email to his team on Thursday (read it below), Levandowski wrote that Uber’s technology was built “independently, from the ground up.”

A court hearing is scheduled for next week. The judge potentially could halt Uber’s self-driving program until the outcome of the trial.

Here’s Levandowski’s email to Uber’s Advanced Technologies Group announcing the leadership change, first obtained by Business Insider. Uber confirmed the email:

Team:

I want to let you know that Travis and I have decided that I will be recused from all LiDAR-related work and management at Uber, through the remainder of the Waymo litigation. This change means that Eric Meyhofer will be the head of ATG, reporting to Travis, and I will report to Eric. My other responsibilities will not change.

As you know, I currently don’t provide input on detailed LiDAR design choices. But making this organizational change means I will have absolutely no oversight over or input into our LiDAR work. Going forward, please make sure not to include me in meetings or email threads related to LiDAR, or ask me for advice on the topic.

We all know the hard work that Eric, James and the LiDAR team have put into independently developing our technology over the past few years.

We should all be proud that our self-driving technology has been built independently, from the ground up. With this move, I hope to keep the team focused on achieving the vision that brought us all here.

Thanks,

Anthony

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Republicans Still Don't Have The Votes For Health Care

WASHINGTON ― House Republican leaders, scrambling to find sufficient support for their revived health care plan, are running into the same problem they’ve had for weeks: They’re still short on the votes.

Republicans have won over just about every conservative they’re going to get after an amendment brokered between moderate Tuesday Group co-chairman Tom MacArthur (R-N.J.) and conservative House Freedom Caucus Chairman Mark Meadows (R-N.C.) brought the vast majority of the Freedom Caucus aboard. But GOP leaders are failing to convince reluctant moderates that they should support a bill undermining protections for people with pre-existing conditions ― and they’re making a whole lot of rank-and-file Republicans nervous.

According to a HuffPost whip count based on interviews with lawmakers and staffers with knowledge of the votes, there are 17 Republicans who appear firmly against the new version of the health care bill and 10 Republicans who seem to be leaning against it. There are also at least 11 other GOP lawmakers who report being undecided and could very well vote no.

Republicans can afford to lose only 22 of their members, assuming every member votes and every Democrat votes against the proposal. With Oversight and Government Reform Chairman Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) expected to miss at least a week for foot surgery, Republicans could pass the bill if they lost 21 Republicans, assuming Chaffetz is absent. There is the possibility that leadership convinces a Republican member or two to simply miss the vote, and other absences on the Democratic side could help the GOP, but the rough math is that Republicans can’t lose more than two dozen of their own, and they appear to be losing more than that now.

It’s that uncertainty that’s preventing House Republicans from speeding to a vote on their revised health care plan. While leaders seem like they could be within a few votes of passing the bill, bringing the proposal to the floor could be disastrous, particularly if fence-sitting Republicans see that it’s going down and decide to join the majority.

Thursday was a turning point for leadership. Majority Whip Steve Scalise (R-La.) and Chief Deputy Whip Patrick McHenry (R-N.C.) spent time on the House floor working members. But instead of flipping votes, members seemed to be walking away from conversations just as resolute in their reservations as before.

After a 12-minute conversation with McHenry on the floor, reliable Republican vote Kevin Yoder (R-Kan.) reported that he was “not a no” on the bill but “not a yes.”

“Still working through it,” he said.

Another dependable leadership ally, Adam Kinzinger (R-Ill.), told HuffPost he was now undecided on the bill, after he slammed the Freedom Caucus last month in a New York Times op-ed for holding out on the health care bill and preventing Republicans from repealing Obamacare.

“The Freedom Caucus play, obviously, it’s what we’ve known them to do a lot,” Kinzinger said of the changes to the bill. “So it wasn’t surprising; it’s disappointing.”

Other Republicans who previously supported the bill were expressing new concern Thursday, with many Republicans uncomfortable with giving states the authority to let insurers opt of charging people with pre-existing conditions the same as healthy people.

“I’m not seeing how this new language, this proposed new language, does anything but make the bill worse, not better,” said Mario Diaz-Balart (R-Fla.).

“Every time I read it, there are more red flags that keep popping up,” he said.

Another moderate Republican who spoke to HuffPost on the condition of anonymity so he could discuss the dynamics more candidly, said a number of Republicans who were supporting the previous bill now didn’t want to take the vote at all, preferring to not go on record because leaders were now asking them to either go back on their promises on pre-existing conditions or to oppose repealing Obamacare.

“That’s certainly not a vote I want to take,” the member said.

In that spirit of avoiding going on the record, other members were cagey about where they stand on the new bill.

Appropriations Chairman Rodney Frelinghuysen (R-N.J.), who may have dealt the previous version of the bill its death blow when he came out in opposition, refused to talk at all about where he stands on Thursday. And a spokesman for Foreign Affairs Chairman Ed Royce (R-Calif.) told The Hill that Royce is also now undecided and has serious concerns.

That two prominent chairman would not be offering their endorsement of the legislation, however, shows just how deep the reservations in the conference run. The universe of opposition may be much larger than anyone really knows. For instance, Scalise spent roughly 10 minutes talking to Bradley Byrne (R-Ala.) on Thursday, and McHenry was working on Jeff Fortenberry (R-Neb.).

Even with a number of potentially surprising holdouts, the one advantage GOP leadership has is that there is still plenty of money to play with. The latest Congressional Budget Office estimate says the bill would save $150 billion over the next 10 years. One way to win over moderates would be to further add money to high-risk pools to shore up coverage for sick people. Another way is to simply add more kickbacks to states, like the Buffalo Buyout.

But even with those sorts of deals, there seems to be a core group of moderates who will remain opposed. The Freedom Caucus’ theory all along has been that those members would cave under pressure from leadership and President Donald Trump. We may soon get to test that.

Here is the current HuffPost whip count on the latest version of the GOP health care proposal. This whip count is based on conversations with lawmakers and staffers with knowledge of how members are voting. Not every lawmaker on this list has confirmed how they will vote ― this is our best guess:

 

No (17)

Mark Amodei (Nevada)

Barbara Comstock (Virginia)

Ryan Costello (Pennyslvania)

Jeff Denham (California)

Charlie Dent (Pennsylvania)                               

Dan Donovan (New York)                          

Brian Fitzpatrick (Pennyslvania)                     

Jaime Herrera Beutler (Washington)

Walter Jones (North Carolina)

John Katko (New York)

Leonard Lance (New Jersey)                                 

Frank LoBiondo (New Jersey)                         

Thomas Massie (Kentucky)

Patrick Meehan (Pennyslvania)                                                                       

Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (Florida)                    

Chris Smith (New Jersey)

David Young (Iowa)

 

Lean No (10)

Andy Biggs (Arizona)

Rod Blum (Iowa)

Carlos Curbelo (Florida)

Mario Diaz-Balart (Florida)

Paul Gosar (Arizona)

David Joyce (Ohio)

Michael Turner (Ohio)

David Valadao (California)

Daniel Webster (Florida)

Rob Wittman (Virginia)

 

Undecided (11)

Justin Amash (Michigan)

Mike Coffman (Colorado)

Paul Cook (California)

Rick Crawford (Arkansas)

Rodney Frelinghuysen (New Jersey)

Adam Kinzinger (Illinois)

Erik Paulsen (Minnesota)

Ed Royce (California)

Elise Stefanik (New York)

Fred Upton (Michigan)

Kevin Yoder (Kansas)

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.