Alabama Governor Plagued By Sex Scandal Rumors Could Face Impeachment

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

The shadow of a sex scandal that has trailed Alabama Gov. Robert Bentley (R) for the past year may have finally caught up to him. 

The embattled governor faces potential prosecution ― and possibly impeachment ― after the state’s Ethics Commission announced late Wednesday that it had found probable cause to believe Bentley broke at least one state ethics law and three campaign laws.

Some of the violations may have occurred as Bentley, 74, allegedly carried out and covered up an affair with his former top political adviser, Rebekah Caldwell Mason, 45. Bentley is accused, among other things, of using state resources for personal matters and for using campaign cash to pay for Mason’s legal fees.

Bentley has denied any wrongdoing. When reached for comment, his office referred to remarks his attorney, William Athanas, had made to reporters following the commission’s vote. 

“It’s important to remember this is simply a finding of probable cause, not a finding of a violation,” Athanas said. “There is not a basis to find the governor violated any law.” 

The commission’s investigation is now referred to the Montgomery County district attorney, who will decide whether to prosecute Bentley. In the meantime, the governor, who has roughly 20 months left on his final term in office, faces sinking approval ratings and calls for his resignation

The Ethics Commission’s ruling may be the last straw for Bentely’s political career, said Steve Flowers, a former Alabama state legislator and political analyst who literally wrote the book on scandalous governors in the state. 

“It’s really damaging. It’s a pivotal thing,” Flowers said of the ruling. 

“Before, he broke people’s trust and lost all credibility and popularity. But now he’s broken the law,” Flowers said. “He’s a dead man walking, politically.” 

Bentley swept into office in 2011 on a conservative platform of job creation, family values and government transparency. He even vowed not to draw a paycheck until Alabama’s unemployment rate went below 5 percent. 

“He was a real Horatio Alger story,” Flowers said of Bentley’s rags-to-riches story. Bentley’s move from humble beginnings to a lucrative dermatology practice made him especially popular with older, conservative voters in rural areas who saw him as familiar and trustworthy.

But the rumored sex scandal, which came to light near the start of Bentley’s second term, has evaporated much of his goodwill with voters. 

“If you ride in on a white horse and wear a white hat and get mud on it, they don’t forgive you,” Flowers said. “He won because he came across as a good ol’ boy, a grandfather-looking guy.”

As early as 2014, political insiders in Montgomery were raising their eyebrows at what some considered to be Mason’s outsized influence on Bentley. Chatter about the relationship and resentment over Mason’s power circulated around the capital and earned Mason the nickname of “de facto governor.”

“[Mason] was running his life,” Flowers said in reference to a meeting he’d had with Bentley about two years ago. “And she ran the whole meeting with me.”

He’s a dead man walking, politically.
Political Analyst Steve Flowers on Gov. Robert Bentley

Spencer Collier, the former head of the Alabama Law Enforcement Agency, said last year that the governor relied on Mason’s opinion above all others. 

“At the end of 2014, Governor Bentley made it clear to me in no uncertain terms that from that point forward, anyone who questioned Rebekah’s influence would be fired,” Collier said at the time. 

Scrutiny escalated further when Bentley’s wife of 50 years filed for divorce in 2015, citing “a complete incompatibility of temperament.”

Then in March 2016, Collier was fired from his job leading the ALEA after holding a press conference in which he alleged that he had seen text messages between Bentley and Mason that were “sexual in nature” and said the governor was interfering in ALEA investigations.

After the below recording of Bentley making sexually explicit comments to a woman identified as “Rebekah” surfaced, Bentley admitted that he had “made mistakes.” Still, he denied having a sexual relationship with Mason. The recording is believed to have been made by his family in an effort to determine if he was having an affair, AL.com reported. 

Mason resigned a week later. Her husband, Joe, remained on the governor’s staff as recently as last year, making a reported $91,000 a year to lead the vaguely defined Office of Faith-Based and Volunteer Service.

The state’s legal and constitutional roadmap isn’t very clear about what would happen after a trial if Bentley is prosecuted ― Alabama has never successfully impeached a sitting governor. 

If the state House voted in favor of impeachment, Bentley would face a trial in the state Senate. 

Bentley’s office has dismissed the claims against him as a “political attack.” But it’s unclear who stands to benefit from a potential impeachment when the governor is already ineligible for a third term and the state’s Republican Party holds a comfortable majority in the state House. 

Many lawmakers, including some from Bentley’s own party, are urging the governor to step aside in the interest of limiting distractions ― and embarrassment ― for the state. 

Senate President Pro Tem Del Marsh (R) said Thursday during a legislative session that Alabama was “stagnant” and already faced a host of critical issues, from education to prison reform.

“I would only ask that I hope at the end of the day the governor would do what’s best for the state of Alabama,” Marsh said. “If these things are pressing, and going to put the state under a cloud, if that’s where we’re headed, I hope the governor does what’s best for the state and seriously considers stepping down.”

Bentley again repeated his refusal to step down, even as his reputation as “The Luv Gov” spreads nationally. 

“It’s a heck of a story,” Flowers said, likening the saga to a soap opera. “In the South, our politicians are our entertainers.”  

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Trump Voters Say They'd Side With Him Over Their Own Member Of Congress

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

Voters who backed President Donald Trump in last year’s presidential election overwhelmingly say they’d be likely to take his side in a dispute against various congressional factions, a new HuffPost/YouGov survey finds.

Sixty-eight percent of Tump voters say they’re more likely to support the president than congressional Republicans in a political dispute, compared to 9 percent who say they would back the legislators. Sixty-four percent of Trump voters say they’re more likely to support the president over their own district’s representative, and 72 percent say they’d back Trump over House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.). 

Responses favored Trump even more heavily than in a previous poll, conducted just before he took office in January. In the earlier survey, 52 percent of Trump voters said they’d take his side over Republicans in Congress, compared to 11 percent who picked the legislators. Fifty-seven percent of Trump voters in that poll also said they’d back him over Ryan, with 8 percent in Ryan’s favor.

The question, of course, is a broad one, and the results don’t necessarily mean that it’s politically impossible for Republicans to break with their president.

One of the first case studies in how such a disagreement might actually play out comes from the fallout over the American Health Care Act, the GOP’s failed attempt at repealing President Barack Obama’s health care law. That effort didn’t play so cleanly in Trump’s favor.

Trump blasted Republicans who opposed the legislation. But while most of his voters were aware that the president backed AHCA, their own support was lukewarm at best. The bill was also deeply unpopular in the districts of many of the House Freedom Caucus members who opposed it, according to an analysis by conservative Republican pollsters.

While Trump’s imprimatur wasn’t enough to activate his base behind the health care bill, its ultimate failure also did relatively little to damage the president in the eyes of his supporters. Few Trump voters laid much blame at the president’s feet, with just 4 percent saying he was most responsible for the law’s demise.

The HuffPost/YouGov poll consisted of 1,000 completed interviews conducted March 27-28 among U.S. adults, using a sample selected from YouGov’s opt-in online panel to match the demographics and other characteristics of the adult U.S. population.

The Huffington Post has teamed up with YouGov to conduct daily opinion polls.You can learn more about this project and take part in YouGov’s nationally representative opinion polling. Data from all HuffPost/YouGov polls can be found here. More details on the polls’ methodology are available here.

Most surveys report a margin of error that represents some, but not all, potential survey errors. YouGov’s reports include a model-based margin of error, which rests on a specific set of statistical assumptions about the selected sample, rather than the standard methodology for random probability sampling. If these assumptions are wrong, the model-based margin of error may also be inaccurate. Click here for a more detailed explanation of the model-based margin of error.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Twitter Sues Trump Administration Over Alleged Attempt To Unmask Owner Of Anti-Trump Account

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

Twitter filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration Thursday over allegations that government officials had tried to force the social media company to reveal the identity behind an anonymous account critical of Trump and his immigration policies. 

The lawsuit alleges that U.S. Customs and Border Protection issued a summons to Twitter in March, demanding that it turn over records that would unmask the identity of the user or users behind the @ALT_uscis, or “ALT Immigration,” account ― an anonymous account that is purportedly run by federal immigration authorities. The account is one of more than a dozen “rogue” federal agency accounts that appeared in the wake of Donald Trump’s January inauguration and posts criticisms of the president’s positions on science, climate change and other issues.

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security, which oversees CBP, was also named as a defendant in the suit, which was filed in federal court in San Francisco, where the company is based.

Twitter filed the suit to challenge the order to reveal the account user’s true identity, saying that unmasking users would be a violation of the First Amendment rights of the company and its users. 

“Compelled disclosure of the identities of Twitter users who have engaged in pseudonymous speech would chill their exercise of the constitutionally protected right to speak anonymously,” the lawsuit reads. “Moreover, independent of its users’ rights, Twitter’s actions in providing a platform for the dissemination of its users’ speech — including its decision to permit the publication of pseudonymous speech — is fully protected by the First Amendment.”

The American Civil Liberties Union said it would be defending the user behind the account and their right to anonymous speech on the platform. 

According to the suit, CBP told Twitter it is “required” to “produce for inspection” all records regarding the @ALT_uscis account including “user names, account login, phone numbers, mailing addresses, and I.P. addresses.”

The records are required “in connection with an investigation or inquiry to ascertain the correctness of entries” and to “determine the liability for duties, taxes, fines, penalties, or forfeitures, and/or to ensure compliance with the laws or regulations administered by CBP and ICE,” CBP said in its summons, according to Twitter’s filing. The summons also requested that Twitter refrain from disclosing the existence of the summons “for an indefinite period of time.”

The order said that failure to comply with the summons could result in Twitter being taken to federal court, according to the suit. 

DHS declined to comment on the suit. 

Read Twitter’s lawsuit below:

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

The Trumps Are Running The Secret Service Into The Ground

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

The situation is increasingly dire at the Secret Service, where the task of keeping up with President Donald Trump and his family has strained the agency nearly to the point of breaking, according to a Thursday report in The New York Times.

After a trying campaign season, the Secret Service has undertaken the immense task of providing protection for Trump, a handful of his aides, the president’s four adult sons and daughters along with their spouses and children, and first lady Melania Trump and their 11-year-old son, who both live at Trump Tower in New York. All told, the Secret Service is looking after 40 percent more people than it would in a typical non-campaign year, essentially putting the agency in perpetual campaign mode, the Times reported.

“They are flat-out worn out,” Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) told the Times.

It’s not just the number of people under Secret Service protection. The president and his family have taken a freewheeling approach to travel in the opening months of his presidency. Trump has spent at least seven weekends at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida in the 11 weeks since his inauguration, each trip costing taxpayers an estimated $3 million or more.

The president’s children have also kept an active schedule, making a number of international and domestic trips for both business and pleasure. His sons Donald Jr. and Eric have flown on work junkets to far-flung places including Dubai and Uruguay, each time traveling with Secret Service details whose expenses are paid by U.S. taxpayers. The extended Trump family also jetted off to Aspen, Colorado, last month on a ski vacation that reportedly required the supervision of around 100 Secret Service agents.

The Trump family’s expensive lifestyle has created a mess for the Secret Service. Last month, the agency requested an additional $60 million in spending for fiscal year 2018, according to a Washington Post report, only to be rebuffed by the Office of Management and Budget. Nearly $27 million of that was to be earmarked for security at Trump Tower. The Secret Service’s annual budget is about $2 billion, with a substantial portion dedicated to protection.

As some had feared, the financial stress is forcing the Secret Service to scale back on other operations, like investigations into cyber-hacking, counterfeit currency, financial crimes, and missing or exploited minors, a former agency official told the Times. Some staffers are reportedly being diverted away from these efforts and onto security details.

News of the Secret Service’s budget woes comes as the agency is facing a wave of negative publicity. On Wednesday, CNN reported that an agent on Vice President Mike Pence’s security detail had been suspended for soliciting a prostitute at a Maryland hotel. The agent was reportedly off duty.

The Secret Service has also weathered criticism for a number of recent security breaches, including a March incident in which an intruder was able to reach a door of the White House. It reportedly took agents nearly 20 minutes to apprehend the trespasser. At the time, former Secret Service agent Dan Bongino, who served under Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama, said the agency’s response was proof that Trump was no longer safe in the White House.

Persistent staffing shortages and the recent departure of Secret Service Director Joe Clancy appear to be complicating the agency’s effort to right ship. Clancy stepped down in February, kicking off a frantic search for a new director.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Special Election In Deep-Red Kansas Is Scaring Republicans

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

The Republican Party is pouring significant money into a Kansas special election for Congress in the final days of the campaign ― an early sign that voter backlash to President Donald Trump is creating political dividends for Democrats in one of America’s most conservative pockets.

The Republican spending in the 4th Congressional District race, first reported by the Wichita Eagle, is likely a response to a surge in Democratic enthusiasm in the district, which happens to be the base for Koch Industries, the conglomerate owned by the right-wing megadonor Koch brothers.

Early voting showing higher-than-normal Democratic turnout in the predominantly Republican district suggests that Republicans have reason to be worried. 

Although Republicans will maintain control of both chambers of Congress until 2018, at least, a strong Democratic showing in Kansas and four other U.S. House special elections before June could still affect Trump’s agenda in the next two years.

“Republicans are not going to stand up to this guy if they see that their re-election is in jeopardy when they stand with him,” said Tom Bonier, CEO of Democratic electoral data strategy firm Target Smart. “This is an indicator of what’s to come and whether or not Republicans are going to be rubber-stamping Trump or standing up to him.” 

The Kansas seat opened when Trump tapped tea party stalwart Mike Pompeo to head the Central Intelligence Agency. The district, which covers a south-central swath of the state that includes Wichita, re-elected Pompeo by more than 31 percentage points in November.

But now, as the Wichita Eagle reports, the National Republican Congressional Committee is injecting $92,000 into the deep-red district in the campaign’s final days. The Washington-based campaign arm for House Republicans bought $67,111 worth of television ads, according to a local news channel’s disclosure form obtained by the Eagle.

The NRCC is spending an additional $25,000 on digital advertising, according to a Federal Election Commission disclosure. Half of those funds are earmarked to boost Ron Estes, the Republican candidate, and the other half will target Democrat James Thompson.

Thompson, a civil rights attorney and Army veteran, is trying to capitalize on public opposition to the hard-line conservative agenda of Kansas Gov. Sam Brownback (R). Brownback on Friday vetoed an expansion of Medicaid passed by the state’s Republican-controlled legislature.

Estes, the Kansas state treasurer, emphasizes budget savings and his fiscally conservative record.  

Absentee voting by mail began across the 4th District on March 20. Early in-person voting also began at the end of March. Election Day is Tuesday.

In 10 out of the 17 counties where early in-person voting data were available, 41 percent of voters were registered Democrats and nearly 48 percent were registered Republicans as of Wednesday, according to Bonier’s analysis of state figures. (Although the Democratic National Committee is one of Target Smart’s clients, the firm is not working on the special election in Kansas in any capacity, Bonier said.)  

In the district’s 2016 general election, by contrast, registered Democrats made up 23 percent of the electorate, while nearly 52 percent of voters were Republican.

Democrats have narrowed the gap in absentee voting by mail as well. Thus far, 43 percent of absentee voters across the district are registered Democrats, while 45 percent are Republicans.

That’s a major change from 2016, when Republicans topped Democrats in absentee voting by 29 percentage points.

Bonier also found evidence that registered Democrats who did not vote in the 2014 midterm elections ― people sometimes known as casual voters ― are turning up this time. Of the 1,326 people who did not participate in the 2014 midterm elections, but have already voted in the special election ― either in person or by mail absentee ballot ― 44 percent are registered Democrats and  29 percent are registered Republicans.

Early voting patterns, of course, are a notoriously inconsistent indicator of final election outcomes. Registered Democrats do not necessarily vote for the Democratic candidate, and turnout on Election Day itself is often what makes the difference. 

Early voting in North Carolina and Florida last fall, for example, appeared to favor Hillary Clinton. She ended up losing both states.

Bonier acknowledged these caveats. But Democrats’ near parity with Republicans in absentee voting, where the GOP often does better, suggests this year could be different.  

And, in such a heavily Republican district, Democrats do not need to win to demonstrate that the wave of anti-Trump enthusiasm has electoral staying power. Holding a Republican margin of victory to 15 percentage points would be a huge accomplishment, Bonier said. 

The special election in Kansas has largely flown under national Democrats’ radar. The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee has not invested in the race, but the organization seemed pleased that Republicans felt compelled to do so.

“President Trump won this traditionally red district by 27 points just a few short months ago, so the fact that the NRCC is panicking now confirms how strong the headwinds are that Republicans face across the country,” DCCC spokesman Tyler Law said in a statement.

The national Democratic Party and liberal activists have focused heavily on the contest for Georgia’s 6th Congressional District, where 30-year-old filmmaker Jon Ossoff is running a competitive race in the seat vacated by Health and Human Services Secretary Tom Price. High Democratic turnout in early voting in Ossoff’s district bodes well for him, too.

Like the Kansas race, the battle to fill Montana’s House seat has gotten less national attention.

But the Democratic candidate in the district, Rob Quist, a popular banjo player who supported Bernie Sanders’ presidential bid, has generated substantial enthusiasm across the state, raising the possibility of an upset there as well.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Spotify's plan to go public might not include an IPO

Now that Spotify is locking down long-term deals with record labels, the company’s next big task is going public. Before you run to the hills at the sound of financial speak, this influx of cash could help the company you know and love keep deliverin…

The Concourse Look At This Fucking Asshole | Jezebel How ModCloth Strayed From Its Feminist Beginnin

The Concourse Look At This Fucking Asshole | Jezebel How ModCloth Strayed From Its Feminist Beginnings and Ended Up a Walmart Property | Fusion What Is Independent Media? | The Root Rep. Elijah Cummings Dissed the Donald, but Trump Thought It Was a Compliment |

Read more…

A Seemingly Harmless Virus Might Be Triggering Celiac Disease

Celiac disease can be a nightmare, with the slew of gluten-triggered ails it brings. Those includes everything from gastrointestinal symptoms like bloating and diarrhea, to psychological symptoms, anemia, seizures… pretty much everything that can make the body feel bad, combined into one awful mess.

Read more…

YouTube’s new ad revenue restrictions target video thieves

Back in 2007, YouTube launched its YouTube Partner Program, a way for its creators to monetize their videos. In the years since, many scammers and opportunistic intellectual thieves have swiped creators’ videos and re-uploaded them under their own accounts to try and make some ad revenue money. This has been a persistent complaint among creators, and so YouTube is taking … Continue reading

Polar M430 is a GPS fitness wearable for runners

Polar has launched a new fitness wearable designed specifically for runners, the Polar M430 GPS running watch. This wearable offers a bunch of features, not the least of which is built-in GPS. As with similar products, the Polar M430 keeps track of the runner’s various metrics, such as their heart rate, running information, and even sleep data, assuming the watch … Continue reading