Facebook Says It Will Ramp Up Fight Against Propaganda

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

Facebook Inc acknowledged on Thursday that it has become a battleground for governments seeking to manipulate public opinion in other countries and outlined new measures it is taking to combat what it calls “information operations” that go well beyond the phenomenon known as fake news.

In a report and summary of response plans on its website on Thursday, Facebook describes well-funded and subtle efforts by nations and other organizations to spread misleading information and falsehoods for geopolitical goals.

These initiatives go much further than posting fake news stories to include amplification – essentially widening the circulation of posts through a variety of means – carried out by government employees or paid professionals, often using fake accounts.

Reuters reviewed an advance copy of the 13-page report, which was written by two veteran security analysts who joined Facebook from cyber security firms FireEye Inc and Dell SecureWorks, along with Facebook’s chief security officer.

Facebook said its security team would now fight information operations, which it regards as a more complex problem than traditional hackers and scammers, by suspending or deleting false accounts after identifying them with a combination of machine learning and intelligence agency-level analysis.

The new efforts build on the company’s recently expanded campaigns to identify fake news and crack down on automated profile pages that post commercial or political spam. Facebook suspended 30,000 accounts in France ahead of last Sunday’s first-round presidential election.

In addressing the U.S. presidential election as a “case study,” the Facebook team said fake Facebook personas had spread stolen emails and other documents as part of a coordinated effort, which U.S. intelligence agencies have attributed to Russia. Other false personas pushed stories that expanded on that material.

“From there, organic proliferation of the messaging and data through authentic peer groups and networks was inevitable,” Facebook said. It said its data “does not contradict” the U.S. director of national intelligence’s conclusion that Russia was behind efforts to interfere with the U.S. election. The report does not name any other countries.

‘FALSE AMPLIFICATION’

Facebook has faced pressure to clamp down on fake news, and has begun warning about suspected hoax stories. In its latest report, Facebook focused on how it will fight “false amplification” and targeted data collection, carried out through methods such as imposter accounts and password-collection schemes.

Facebook employees said the information operations it had seen included techniques such as carefully crafted friend requests sent under the appropriated names of real people. If those requests are accepted, the false friends can glean more information about the target.

That information in turn can be used to send convincing web links leading to malicious software or to map the social networks of the targets for further spying.

Facebook said it would go after amplifier accounts based on behavioral analysis that shows signs of inauthenticity, such as sudden bursts of activity or repeated posting of the same material, without regard to the politics of the content.

Facebook said that other amplification techniques it had discovered include coordinated “likes” to boost the prominence of key postings, the creation of groups that camouflage propaganda by including legitimate items, and the spread of inflammatory and racist material.

Most of the false amplification is driven by people with local language skills and a basic knowledge of the relevant political situation, the study said.

Though the goals may often be to promote one cause or candidate or to denigrate another, another objective appears to be sowing distrust and confusion in general, the authors wrote.

In some cases, they said, the same fake accounts engaged with both sides of an issue “with the apparent intent of increasing tensions between supporters.”

Facebook’s new crackdown reflects a striking change in perspective from November, when Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg dismissed the argument that fake stories on Facebook could have influenced the U.S. presidential election “in any way” as “a pretty crazy idea.”

 

(Reporting by Joseph Menn; Editing by Bill Rigby and Grant McCool)

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

United Airlines Settles With Passenger Who Was Dragged From Plane

United Airlines announced Thursday it has reached a settlement with a passenger who was injured and bloodied after officers dragged him from his seat on a flight earlier in April. 

Dr. David Dao’s lawyer said he reached an agreement for undisclosed terms over the incident in which his nose was broken and several teeth were knocked out after he refused to give up his seat for a United employee on a flight from Chicago to Louisville, Kentucky. 

In a statement, United said that it had “reached an amicable resolution of the unfortunate incident that occurred aboard flight 3411.”

“We look forward to implementing the improvements we have announced, which will put our customers at the center of everything we do,” the statement added.

The settlement with Dao came the same day that United announced new policies to handle similar situations when flights are overbooked. Passengers can receive up to $10,000 in incentives if they get bumped from their seat. 

“Dr. Dao has become the unintended champion for the adoption of changes which will certainly help improve the lives of literally millions of travelers,” said Thomas Demetrio, his attorney, in a statement. 

Other passengers recorded video of Dao screaming before police at Chicago O’Hare International Airport dragged him through the plane’s aisle. Some passengers could be heard complaining about how Dao was treated. 

The flight was not technically overbooked, but United staff demanded that four travelers who had already boarded, including Dao, give up their seats for employees needed in Louisville the next day. 

United bungled its response to the altercation with a series of statements that criticized Dao and contained industry jargon that rang hollow.

“After our team looked for volunteers, one customer refused to leave the aircraft voluntarily and law enforcement was asked to come to the gate,” the airline said in one statement. 

Later, CEO Oscar Munoz followed up by saying on Twitter that “I  apologize for having to re-accommodate these passengers.”

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

When Friends 'Ba Dum Tss!' Each Other's Jokes, Bad Things Happen

Back in the day, rimshots were perhaps an honorable thing to play to punctuate a comedian’s punchline, but now it’s about shame. When your friend says “Ba dum tss!” after your joke, that means you should be ashamed of yourself.

Comedy writer Evan Krumholz takes “Ba dum tss!” to the next level. … No, a level even beyond that one. … And that one, too. This level has blood. 

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Schumer Trolls Trump Tax Plan: You're Doing It Wrong

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

WASHINGTON ― Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) had a tart message for President Donald Trump on his tax reform proposal Thursday: You’re doing it wrong.

Schumer pulled out the old internet meme after Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin said he couldn’t guarantee that the tax cuts would benefit the middle class. The one-page outline of the plan released Tuesday would definitely represent a large cut for the wealthiest Americans

“The president’s outline yesterday is a direct assault on the middle class,” Schumer told reporters on Capitol Hill.

“If on one piece of paper you can guarantee that the wealthy and special interests will pay less, but can’t guarantee that for the middle class, you’re doing it all wrong,” Schumer said.

He added that the blueprint looks more like a self-interested ploy to aid Trump and the billionaire and millionaire members of his cabinet.

“What President Trump unveiled yesterday is not the Trump tax plan, it is the plan to lower President Trump’s taxes, the taxes of his Cabinet and people as wealthy as they are,” Schumer said.

Republicans have hailed the president’s outline as the right path to reform the nation’s complicated tax laws, arguing that increased economic activity will offset any revenue lost due to the cuts.

Many analysts said there was not enough specificity to the short document to say exactly how large the tax cuts would be. But based on Trump’s campaign platform, the cuts could add some $8 trillion to the deficit, according to a New York Times tally.

Schumer suspected ill intent lies behind such a proposal from a party that complains about deficits when it comes to things like disaster relief and helping 9/11 responders, but not when it comes to giving the wealthy tax breaks.

“The Trump tax breaks blow such a gigantic whole in our deficit, it could endanger Medicare and Social Security, which may well be the nefarious ultimate goal of the hard right,” Schumer said. “You can be sure a few years down the road that our Republican colleagues on the hard right will come to us and say the deficit is so big, we have to reduce Medicare and Social Security.”

The Senate minority leader described Trump’s tax ideas as a “non-starter” for Democrats.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Melania Trump Has Upended The Role Of First Lady In 100 Days

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

WASHINGTON ― Nearly 100 days into President Donald Trump’s administration, first lady Melania Trump has been reluctant to embrace her new role, and it’s unclear how she will define what can be a somewhat nebulous, arcane and sexist position.

Just as she avoided involvement in her husband’s campaign, Melania Trump has chosen to remain out of the spotlight as first lady. She and their son Barron continue living at Trump Tower in New York, and reportedly plan to move into the White House this summer once Barron’s school year ends. Her staff remains unfilled, and she has eschewed many ceremonial duties.

This failure to embrace even basic functions has been particularly unusual, according to Kate Andersen Brower, author of First Women: The Grace and Power of America’s Modern First Ladies. Melania Trump’s decision not to immediately move into the White House, for example, is “unprecedented,” Brower said.

Some of Trump’s slowness to fill her staff can be attributed to her lack of involvement in her husband’s campaign. Many first ladies will bring on advisers and staff members who worked closely with them before they entered the White House.

“Even at the very beginning, they have a dozen staffers working for them,” Brower said of previous first ladies. “Because she was barely on the campaign, she didn’t develop those relationships with staffers, and I think that was detrimental.”

Trump hired a communications director only a month ago. Leaving the key post unfilled for the first two months of her husband’s administration was particularly glaring, Brower said. Without someone to coordinate her message, Trump remains mostly unknown to the public, generating further speculation about her.

“She’s like a cipher,” Brower said. “You have to direct that message.”

A full staff could help Trump avoid kerfuffles at otherwise routine events. For instance, she read a passage from a Dr. Seuss book last month to children at a hospital in New York. The event was described by a White House pool reporter, but the White House later issued a statement that appeared to embellish Trump’s remarks and actions. 

Trump has sporadically joined her husband in Washington and at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida for ceremonial events, like dinners with foreign leaders. In his wife’s absence, the president has sometimes dispatched his daughter, White House adviser Ivanka Trump, to handle duties that might normally be performed by the first lady.

In February, Melania Trump broke a longstanding tradition that the first lady accompanies the spouse of a visiting foreign leader. Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s wife, Akie, was alone during her visit to Washington. The White House claimed Melania Trump’s absence was the result of a scheduling error with Abe.

Brower called the White House’s handling of the visit “embarrassing.”

“You’re being a rude host, really,” Brower said. “Part of the job of the first lady is to escort spouses, men or women, around Washington, and you kind of just suck it up and do it, even if you don’t want to.”

While some first ladies have spent a large portion of their time away from Washington, “you at least make the effort to say that you live in the White House and that you understand of the responsibility of the position,” Brower said.

Modern first ladies have pressed policy issues that interest them. Laura Bush focused on literacy. Michelle Obama pursued initiatives on wellness, girls’ education and military families.

Brower said it’s not unusual for first ladies to take a while to find their footing and “figure out how they can help.” But for Melania Trump, choosing a policy area could be challenging.

The first lady can pick up the phone and change someone’s life. To not take advantage of it, it seems, to me, like a shame.”
Kate Andersen Brower, author of “First Women: The Grace and Power of America’s Modern First Ladies”

If she were to advocate health and physical fitness, for example, she could expose the administration to controversy, given the president’s long history of denigrating women by talking about their physical appearance.

“These are such innocuous things, but because of her husband, everything is so politically charged,” Brower said. “It’s very hard to find something that doesn’t offend people.”

During her husband’s campaign, Melania Trump pledged that as first lady, she would combat cyberbullying — a promise that immediately drew mockery because of her husband’s frequent Twitter rants. She has yet to follow through.

Last month, military veterans criticized the first lady for not commenting on a scandal involving Marine Corps personnel sharing explicit photos of female service members on social media.

“We are waiting for our first lady to support our women in uniform against continued harassment,” Navy veteran Trina McDonald, a member of the group Common Defense, said in a press release. The group urged Trump to “break her silence and speak up,” according to the Military Times.

But in recent weeks, the first lady appears to have been tiptoeing into her new reality. She has hosted events that have included a women’s empowerment panel and the annual White House Easter Egg Roll, a tradition that some people worried would end under Trump.

On Wednesday, the first lady appeared with the president at a White House event honoring the National Teacher of the Year. On Thursday, she joined him during a visit from Argentina’s President Mauricio Macri and first lady Juliana Awada.

“Maybe she’ll figure it out,” Brower said. “I think she’s caving to the pressure. I think it takes time to realize that you have to live in the White House and make some sacrifices.”

First ladies come under intense scrutiny, often in gendered terms, especially when they become involved in crafting policy.

Hillary Clinton, in particular, faced sharp criticisms throughout her husband’s presidency for having an office in the West Wing and for spearheading the Clinton administration’s failed attempt at health care reform.

Trump’s approach is not without historical analogues. Brower compared her with Bess Truman, who also was reluctant to become first lady and did not like the spotlight.

“I think Melania is bringing us back to the 1950s approach to first lady,” Brower said. “In her actions, she has been traditional.”

Still, her decision to eschew tradition and continue living in New York could be perceived as “strangely feminist,” and a sign of independence, Brower said. 

As she settles into the role, Trump will face unique challenges, Brower said.

“She’s not from the U.S., and I do think that’s part of it,” Brower said. “Growing up in this country, the first lady symbolically is a part of your life, and a part of American culture, and so I think people should give her some slack for that. She didn’t grow up with that, and so in a way, it is a very foreign concept.” 

Further, Michelle Obama was a popular first lady who left “big shoes to fill” in finding creative ways to reach the public, from late-night TV appearances to making viral videos, Brower said.

“You can’t picture yourself having coffee, or in a carpool with Melania Trump,” Brower said. “She’s not relatable in the same way. But clearly, she does not plan to do as much as Michelle Obama or Laura Bush.”

Trump’s distant approach could indicate that the role of the presidential spouse is no longer necessary, Brower suggested.

“I still think it’s important,” Brower added. “You can do a lot of good. The first lady can pick up the phone and change someone’s life. To not take advantage of it, it seems, to me, like a shame.”

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Let's Reconsider That Rachel Maddow Segment On Trump's Taxes That Everyone Hated

On March 14 MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow took to the airwaves and presented an hour-long segment on two pages of President Donald Trump’s 2005 tax returns. Those documents, obtained by journalist David Cay Johnston, revealed that Trump made $150 million in personal income that year, on which he paid $38 million in taxes.

It was one of the most hyped segments to air on cable news this year, with Maddow tweeting ahead of time, “BREAKING: We’ve got Trump tax returns. Tonight, 9pm ET. MSNBC. (Seriously).” It was also widely felt to be one of the most disappointing cable news segments of the year. The National Review’s Jim Geraghty opined that it was a “waste [of] everyone’s time.” Slate’s Willa Paskin called it “a cynical, self-defeating spectacle.” The Observer’s Ashe Schow summed it up as an “epic fail.”

While most of the criticism centered on the lengthy way Maddow constructed the segment, perhaps unaware that such long wind-ups are her stock in trade, her critics had a point. It was weird, knowing that she’d only obtained two pages of documentation to bill the matter on Twitter the way she did ― only afterwards could you see that the phrase “we’ve got Trump tax returns” allowed her the linguistic wiggle-room necessary to claim to have billed the show properly. Moreover, the tax returns on hand were more than a decade old, and weren’t sufficient to get into the meat of Trump’s tax return mysteries ― like the extent to which he is leveraged by debtors, or the breadth of his international business entanglements.  

But while Maddow may have not delivered on the day, the segment nevertheless planted a seed of inquiry. And now that we have the broad contours of Trump’s tax cut proposals, there’s new light to be shone on what the MSNBC host did back in March.

One of the few things that viewers were able to ascertain during Maddow’s segment was the amount of money Trump paid through the alternate minimum tax (AMT). In fact, that’s the vehicle through which Trump paid the bulk of that $38 million. In terms of regular federal income tax, Trump and his wife paid $5.3 million, which would peg his tax rate at less than four percent. However, the AMT collected $31 million in tax revenue.

Trump has long wanted to eliminate the AMT, and guess what? His tax proposal would do just that.

Trump is not the only person who’s called for the repeal of the AMT. While the AMT primarily hits high income earners, it’s not aimed at the mega-rich. As the Tax Policy Center summarizes, “The individual alternative minimum tax (AMT) primarily affects well-off households, but not those with the very highest incomes. It is also more likely to hit taxpayers with large families, those who are married, and those who live in high-tax states.” Those who want to eliminate the AMT can do so knowing that this isn’t a tax break that lets plutocrats off the hook ― it can be framed as a benefit for upper-middle class strivers and entrepreneurs.

And liberals, like Bernie Sanders, have called for the AMT’s elimination as well ― though there are important distinctions to note. But as Business Insider’s Frank Chapparo reported back in March, Sanders also “called for a number of ‘provisions aimed at high-income households’ that would essentially do what the AMT was intended to do: make sure the extremely wealthy pay their fair share.” His aim: to secure the necessary proceeds to expand the safety net on more vulnerable Americans. Trump’s tax plan doesn’t make any attempt at doing this ― it’s just a straight up giveaway to the wealthy.

Knowing that 81.5 percent of the taxes he paid in 2005 were facilitated through the existence of a tax he wants to eliminate puts Trump’s own interests under the spotlight. According to the Center for Economic and Policy Research, eliminating the AMT is one of the mechanisms in his tax plan that would pay off big for Trump down the line. Thanks to Maddow, we have a feel for how much he’ll save. (A lot!)

But the Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR) estimates that another potential windfall awaits Trump through another part of his tax plan: his proposal to drop the tax rate on mechanisms called “S-corporations” down to 15 percent. S-corporations can be considered a federal government subsidy for the wealthy because they permit an entity to claim limited liability benefits while also allowing them to pay the corporate income tax rate.

As the CEPR notes, Trump’s proposal would mean that “while the top marginal tax rate will ostensibly be 33 percent on the rich, those who are not too dumb to breathe will get their money through S-Corporations and pay just 15 percent.” This, they conclude, would “lead to tremendous job growth in the tax shelter industry, as hundreds of thousands of rich people rush to hire lawyers and accountants so that they can get all their income through pass-through corporations.”

And Trump would benefit as well. Per the CEPR:

While he has refused to release his tax returns he claims he has assets of $10 billion. Let’s say that he gets a 5 percent annual return, or $500 million a year, as income. This is certainly a very modest assumption for a person with Donald Trump’s business acumen.

Now, if he had to pay the 28 percent alternative minimum tax he would be paying $140 million a year in taxes. But after the Trump tax plan goes into effect, he would only have to pay $75 million in taxes. This means that the Trump tax plan will save Donald Trump $65 million a year in taxes. Trump’s savings would be only a bit less than the annual wages of 4,500 minimum wage workers. Now isn’t that terrific?

Of course, the CEPR can only guess at how much Trump stands to benefit because he has not released his tax returns. That we have only two pages of his personal tax returns from 2005 is not enough to evaluate how much skin Trump has in the game he’s asking the entire country to play.

Given the fact that the man is indistinguishable from his business interests, perhaps we need to shut down Trump’s tax proposal until we know what’s going on. But what little we know, we know because of what Maddow and Johnston told us. And if that Maddow segment left audiences wanting more, well…maybe that was the point.

~~~~~

Jason Linkins edits “Eat The Press” for The Huffington Post and co-hosts the HuffPost Politics podcast “So, That Happened.” Subscribe here, and listen to the latest episode below.  

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

New Sci-Fi Novel Is Set In A World Where Hillary Clinton Actually Won

In the aftermath of last year’s presidential election ― which turned out differently than most media outlets predicted ― the questions on a lot of minds seemed to be “How?” and “Why?”

Today, William Gibson ― the American-Canadian science fiction novelist behind the 1984 cyberpunk classic Neuromancer, in which he coined the term “cyberspace”  ― is exploring another question in his forthcoming novel: What if?

What if instead of electing President Donald Trump, whose first 100 days in office have in many ways chipped away at the constitutional value of free expression, Hillary Clinton had won instead?

Gibson applied this question to a book he was already working on before last year’s results came in. In an interview with The New York Times, he explained why he didn’t alter his plot after Trump’s victory. “It was immediately obvious to me that there had been some fundamental shift and I would have to rebuild the whole thing,” he said.

The result is a book ― titled Agency and due out in January 2018 ― set on two different timelines: in present-day San Fransisco, but with Clinton as president, and in London 200 years from now, after 80 percent of the human population has been killed off. Those still alive are trying to communicate with 2017, in an attempt to change the past.

Gibson is celebrated for his ability to synthesize what’s happening around him ― especially technological developments ― and take a good guess at what may happen in the near future.

In a 2014 interview with HuffPost about his last novel, The Peripheral, he said, “A shaming crowd, on Twitter, for instance, can feel like something out of Orwell,” predicting, perhaps knowingly, that the platform lends itself to manipulative speech and “very pure crowd dynamics.”

Sound familiar?

type=type=RelatedArticlesblockTitle=Related… + articlesList=590209e7e4b081a5c0fb7bbf,59009e60e4b0af6d718a3ee6,58d53a53e4b03692bea50fd8,5900a308e4b0af6d718a4cc0,58f52421e4b0da2ff862749f

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

How North Korea's Political Ideology Became A De-Facto Religion

On Tuesday, the highly insular North Korea conducted a massive artillery drill to mark the foundation of its military as tensions with the United States continued to escalate.

Like many aspects of North Korea’s political and economic systems, its military came into being under the late president Kim Il Sung. Born into a Christian family during a time of Japanese colonial rule in Korea, Kim rose to power with a vision of an isolated, almost hermit-like independence for his fledgling country.

It was under Kim that the political ideology of “juche” ― a guiding philosophy that places commitment to the state above all else ― took hold in the 1950s and solidified in subsequent decades.

Juche’s pervading influence on civic life explains why freedoms of any sort, including religion, are scarce in a nation that treats its current and past leaders as heroes of mythic proportion.

Juche literally means self-reliance. As a political philosophy, it entails utter independence to the exclusion of any kind of outside influence. Kim described the ideology in a 1955 speech in the aftermath of the Korean War by saying: “All
 ideological
 work
 must
 be
 subordinated
 to
 the
 interests
 of
 the
 Korean
 revolution.” In other words, the state, its leaders and its political vision come before the interests and identities of individuals.

In practice, said Korean history scholar Donald Baker, juche ― and the unconditional loyalty it demands of the citizens ― has “evolved into a functional equivalent of religion.”

As a result, organized religion is tolerated at best and viewed as secondary to juche, which operates to maintain North Koreans’ faith in the government and in the Kim family. “Juche serves as an ideological tool for unifying the country,” Baker, a professor of Korean history and civilization at the University of British Columbia, told HuffPost. “It says, ‘We don’t need God. Instead, we rely on the leader.’”

Immortality comes about in that if your body dies, as long as your community survives you’ll have some sort of continued existence.”

Like religion might, juche even promises North Koreans a kind of immortality through their dedication to the state.

“In juche human beings are defined as members of a sociopolitical community,” Baker said. “There’s no individual apart from the community. Immortality comes about in that if your body dies, as long as your community survives you’ll have some sort of continued existence.”

As scholar Grace Lee wrote in an article on juche published in the Stanford Journal of East Asian Affairs: “When Kim Il Sung unilaterally declared juche to be the governing principle of all aspects of North Korean life, as well as the ideological basis of all state policies, the philosophy gained the full authority of Kim Il Sung’s godlike status.”

There are an estimated 40,000 statues of the late president throughout the country. Every home in North Korea is required to have portraits of Kim and his son and successor, Kim Jong Il, who died in 2011, displayed. The portraits are treated like sacred objects and must be kept clean and well-maintained.

The bodies of Kim Il Sung and Kim Jong Il are embalmed and on display at Pyongyang’s Kumsusan Memorial Palace, a site known at the “palace of the sun” and treated like a shrine. Like his father, Kim Jong Il is also revered with an immortal status and carries the title “eternal leader.”

Kim Il Sung’s grandson and the current leader of North Korea, Kim Jong Un, is often referred to as having “a sacred bloodline,” Baker explained. As long as he and his descendants survive, the juche community lives on.

Some say juche builds upon Marxist ideals, which governed the country for the first half of the 20th century, but Baker argues the ideology has more to do with Korea’s history of Confucianism than with communism.

“Confucianism has a focus on the family and on community,” Baker said. “There’s the idea that your identity comes from your family and your community. You’re alive as long as your descendants remember you.” 

Confucianism, a spiritual philosophy that developed in China some 2,500 years ago, was a guiding ideology in Korea for centuries and dictated an antagonism toward organized religion long before Kim ever came into power. 

Under Confucianism, citizens were required to observe certain rituals, including funeral rites. When someone died, their children were required to honor the deceased by commemorating a tablet with their name on it and bowing before it during rituals. In Catholicism, this treatment of a sacred object was considered to be idolatry. Paul Yun Ji-Chung, a Korean Catholic man alive in the late 18th century, angered the government by failing to perform the tablet duty after his mother died. He was executed in 1791.

Pope Francis beatified Ji-Chung in 2014, bestowing upon him a blessed status one step away from sainthood.

The Catholic leader also honored more than 100 priests and laity who met a similar fate to Ji-Chung in Korea. One man, Bishop Francis Borgia Hong Yong-ho of Pyongyang, was imprisoned in 1949 under Kim and is believed to have died in a prison camp.

North Korea continues to view Christianity with distrust. The government sees the 2,000-year-old faith as a tool of foreign powers, Baker said, evidenced by the arrival of missionaries who came from abroad throughout the 18th and 19th centuries. Buddhism, one of the other main religions maintaining a fragile presence in the country, is largely seen as the product of the past.

The government allows religious organizations to exist, but membership is small for a country of some 25 million. There are an estimated 10,000 members of the Korean Christian Federation, North Korea’s Protestant organization. North Korean authorities have reported roughly 3,000 members of the country’s Catholic association, about 10,000 in the Buddhist federation, and some 15,000 in the indigenous Korean Chondoism movement.

Pew Research Center reports higher numbers of religious affiliation in the country, derived from estimates from the World Religion Database, with some 480,000 Christians, 370,000 Buddhists and 3 million adherents of folk religions in North Korea as of 2010. 

But the Central Intelligence Agency’s World Factbook notes: “Autonomous religious activities [are] now almost nonexistent [in North Korea.] Government-sponsored religious groups exist to provide illusion of religious freedom.”

“One of the reasons they allow religious organizations to operate is for international cooperation,” the scholar said. “They can send representatives to religious conferences, like the International Council of Churches, and spread propaganda.” Namely, an international presence at faith conferences allows the country to maintain a facade of religious freedom.

Folk religious practices, including shamanism and fortune-telling, exist in parts of the country, according to Ji-Min Kang, a North Korean writer for The Guardian. Kang, who left North Korea in 2005, reported that it’s common for people in North Korea to turn to shamans and fortune-tellers for help in their daily lives. “Many North Koreans invest their money in fortune-telling,” Kang wrote in a 2014 article. “North Koreans, you see, would rather trust the spirits than the party or nation.”

The government is outwardly opposed to fortune-telling, but Kang said there are rumors that even the country’s top elites and officials consult fortune-tellers or, if they’re men, send their wives to do so.

Activists have indicated that citizens get around the government’s restrictions on religion by worshipping in secret churches. Reports of an underground church network helping smuggle refugees out of the country have painted an inspiring image of resistance in recent years. But Baker is skeptical about the presence or impact of such a reported network.

People are too afraid to even engage with religion.

“Most of the Christians who could fled to the South during the war. It’d be very difficult to maintain a Christian community in North Korea because you really don’t have any privacy,” he said. “Government officials could break into your home at any time to make sure you have your Kim Il Sung portrait displayed. And none of the refugees I know who have left have said they know anything about an underground church.”

Resistance to the government’s overwhelming demand for loyalty in the form of religious organizing is scarce ― or at least inconspicuous ― because “people are too afraid to even engage with religion,” Baker said. Where the government does occasionally crack down, though, is on foreigners. If a tourist so much as leaves a Bible in their hotel room, they could be arrested at the airport and detained for questioning.

In 2015, Korean Canadian pastor Hyeon Soo Lim was arrested during a humanitarian trip to North Korea and accused of using religion to try to destroy the country and help foreign powers lure North Korean citizens away. The 62-year-old was sentenced to life in prison with hard labor. His fate remains uncertain.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

These CEOs Wanted To ‘Fix The Debt’ Until Trump Proposed A Massive Corporate Tax Cut

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

Fix the Debt exists for one reason: to argue for less U.S. government debt. It is an organization explicitly founded on the idea that lots of government debt is bad, there is already too much of it, and more is worse.

To help push the economically dubious idea that debt is going to cripple the U.S. government, Fix the Debt coats its core mission in the usual content-free D.C. catchphrases ― “bipartisan plan,” “common belief,” “long-term challenges,” “people all across America.” The group also enlists a platoon of former politicians to sit sternly on panels and say that the only way forward is tax reform along with cuts to Social Security and Medicare. There’s also a Fix the Debt CEO Fiscal Leadership Council, which is a 22-person steering committee made up of 22 men.

Surely now that there is a businessman in the White House and his two top economic advisers, both ex-Goldman Sachs executives, have rolled out a rudimentary tax plan that slashes taxes for corporations, heirs and heiresses, investors, and rich people ― while increasing the national debt by somewhere between $3 trillion and $7 trillion and making no serious attempt to offset the cost elsewhere ― these CEOs are issuing outraged statements, right?

Haha, of course not.

HuffPost asked every single member of Fix the Debt’s CEO council for a response to the president’s tax outline, and as of press time, not a single one of the executives denounced it.

Why won’t executives who want less government debt condemn a proposal that dramatically increases government debt?

Most of the executives on Fix the Debt’s CEO council either declined to comment or did not respond to HuffPost’s requests. But the executives who were willing to go on the record are pretty clear-cut about what is going on: It’s a corporate tax cut, so they think it’s good.

For instance, a Deere & Company spokesman said on behalf of CEO Samuel Allen that the company “supports efforts to improve the corporate tax code to make U.S. business and investment more competitive in today’s global marketplace.” That’s a not-even-well-disguised way of saying “it’s a tax cut, so it’s good.”

Trump’s plan is not real tax reform, and anyone who says it is is trying to sell you a tax cut. Like, for instance, the CEO of General Electric, Jeff Immelt. A GE spokesman referred HuffPost to a comment from the American Made Coalition, an industry group the company belongs to, that lauds the White House for its “commitment to move forward on comprehensive tax reform.”

Some of the responses were even more direct. The spokesman for Airlines for America, the main airline industry group that is headed by former Citigroup executive and Bush administration official Nicholas Calio, said, “Generally speaking, we support reducing the corporate tax rate and implementing additional reforms needed to simplify the tax system.”

So what’s the point of Fix the Debt’s CEO council if its members won’t criticize a tax plan that increases the national debt? They don’t seem to care enough about national debt to say anything critical when what’s at stake is a tax cut for themselves, their companies and their descendants. That, at least, is instructive silence.

For years, progressives’ critique of the fiscal hawk movement ― which Fix the Debt’s founders Erskine Bowles and Alan Simpson as well as funder Pete Peterson sit at the center of ― has centered on the argument that all this worrying about the debt is a stalking horse to cut social programs and taxes for the rich.

While Fix the Debt put out a tepid statement about Trump’s tax plan, calling for responsible legislation, and a related group called the Committee For A Responsible Federal Budget was harsher, the refusal of Fix the Debt’s CEO council members to denounce Trump’s tax outline in any way is proving the group’s critics right.

CORRECTION: An earlier version of this story stated Trump’s tax plan would increase the national debt by $3 billion to $7 billion. The correct figure is $3 trillion to $7 trillion.

Sign up for the HuffPost Must Reads newsletter. Each Sunday, we will bring you the best original reporting, long form writing and breaking news from The Huffington Post and around the web, plus behind-the-scenes looks at how it’s all made. Click here to sign up!

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

5 Surprising Things You Didn’t Know About Your Immune System

People often make reference to the immune system when feeling under the weather, but we wondered how many people truly understand the complexities of this internal task force?

To put it plainly, the immune system is a network of cells, tissues and organs that work together to protect the body. It is the immune system’s responsibility to tell your body what belongs and what does not. In rare chronic cases, like primary immunodeficiency, the immune system is either missing or isn’t working properly, but for most healthy people, it separates friend from foe ― and responds to enemies (like bacteria, viruses and parasites) that threaten invasion.

In order to maintain overall wellness, all of the organs and cells that make up this defense network have highly specific assignments to carry out. That’s why we’ve partnered with Shire to uncover five little-known facts about the body’s top defense team.

1. The Immune System Can (Usually) Course-Correct

Your immune system is designed to work behind the scenes to keep you healthy. For most healthy people, the immune system adapts to changes by responding to new germs like bacteria, viruses, and parasites every day. This constant exposure to new germs allows our immune systems to learn as they go, building immunities day to day. However, in rare cases, people with chronic immune conditions, like primary immunodeficiency, have a defective immune system that is unable to course-correct like a healthy immune system does, which leaves them prone to infections.

2. The Gut Acts As Gatekeeper

The largest part of your immune system is in the gut (or gastrointestinal tract), according to Dr. Katharine Woessner, a California-based physician who specializes in allergies, asthma and immunology. “[The gut] is also the hardest working part of the immune system… as it is constantly regulating what is going on,” she says. Your gastrointestinal system works to differentiate bad bacteria from the good ones that are key for overall immune health. Believe it or not this, er, gut checking, starts when a baby is in utero.

3. The Thymus Gland Has A Prime Time

Much like a high school prom king, your thymus sees its best days and is in prime condition during its youth. The thymus ― located behind your sternum and in between your lungs ― is responsible for producing an important type of white blood cell called T-lymphocytes or T cells. Immature T cells are sent to the thymus where they mature and become an important part of the body’s innate and adaptive immune system, as defenders against bacteria and viruses. And interestingly, once you hit puberty, the thymus begins to shrink and slowly becomes fatty tissue deposits.

4. Yes, You Can Live Without Your Spleen

The spleen is one of the largest lymphatic organs in the body, and works to clean your blood of virus, bacteria and other illness agents. Located behind your stomach and under your diaphragm, this multi-purpose organ filters defective red blood cells, as well as stores white blood cells that can produce antibodies. The spleen grows temporarily when your body is fighting an infection, but if it ruptures, it has to be removed. Though you can live without your spleen, it’s easier to stay in optimal health with it, according to the Mayo Clinic. “Your immune system has a lot of built-in redundancies,” Woessner says, so in most cases if there are deficiencies, there are also work arounds.

5. Antibodies Are A Microscopic Infantry

When your body detects germs, or foreign substances that elicit an immune response, it may trigger the creation of antibodies. Once created, antibodies remember the invaders, and prevent these same antigens from making a repeat attack. This scientific discovery made the efficacy of vaccinations a reality.

Though antibodies are your body’s safeguard, a little TLC from time to time can, for most people, keep the immune system functioning smoothly. It seems obvious, but remembering to wash your hands is one of the most effective ways to prevent the spread of illnesses. Though more than 90 percent of Americans agree it’s important to wash up after using a public bathroom, only 2 out of 3 actually admit to doing so.

Lifestyle changes that may help give the immune system some support include getting enough sleep, exercising regularly, eating healthy foods, and practicing stress-reducing techniques, like meditation and yoga. However, people who feel they get sick more often than usual should consult their doctor.

A healthy immune system is important when it comes to living a healthy life; however, some people have chronic conditions where their immune system is either missing or working improperly.  Shire is a leader in providing support to those with chronic diseases, such as Primary Immunodeficiency (PI), and offers a broad portfolio of immunoglobulin (IG) products and support services for people living with PI. Click here to learn more.

 

S27125 4/17

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.