Young People In Chicago Want Chance The Rapper To Run For Mayor

“They screamin,’ ‘Chano for mayor,’ I’m thinkin’ maybe I should.”

A group of Chance the Rapper fans in Chicago are trying to bring the rapper’s “Somewhere in Paradise” lyrics to fruition by urging Chano to run for mayor. 

The #Chano4Mayor campaign website, launched on April 1, was created by a group of young people in the city, including 23-year-old game designer Bea Malsky.

Malsky told the Chicago Sun-Times that they’d love to see the rapper run against incumbent Mayor Rahm Emanuel, who is slated to compete for the seat again in 2019. The rapper has earned an admirable reputation for his political activism and philanthropy, including a recent million-dollar donation to the Chicago Public Schools system.

The website cites a dissatisfaction with the way Emanuel has governed the city, specifically in terms of its public schools.

“Rahm Emanuel has been in office since 2011,” the website reads. “In that time we’ve seen the closure of 50 public schools, the largest in history.” It also goes on to lament the closure of half of the city’s mental health clinics and the shooting of Laquan McDonald

Emanuel’s administration defended itself against the statements on the campaign’s website.

“We’re focused on continuing to build on the record educational gains our students and teachers are making at Chicago Public Schools, driving economic development in every neighborhood across the city and addressing our public-safety challenge by combating the scourge of gun violence,” Emanuel’s spokesperson Matt McGrath said in a statement to the Sun-Times. 

But even if Chance opts out of challenging Emanuel ― which is highly probable given his father, Ken Bennett, works as the deputy chief of staff and director for Emanuel’s Office of Public Engagement ― Malsky said they hope he can at least endorse one of the mayoral candidates.

“We would be very happy if he’d become more politically involved and he endorsed a candidate who stands up for the same things that he stands up for in his music,” she told the Sun-Times. 

The campaign’s Twitter account has garnered nearly 100 followers as of Wednesday afternoon. Chance the Rapper’s team did not immediately respond to a request for comment.  

Your call, Chano. 

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Princess Diana Challenged Postpartum Depression Stigma Over 20 Years Ago

Decades ago, Princess Diana defied the taboo of postpartum depression by openly discussing her experience with the disorder in a very public interview.

In 1995, the BBC interviewed Diana for its show titled “Panorama.” The now famous (and then secretive) interview is known for Diana’s discussion about infidelity within her marriage to Prince Charles, but during her chat with Martin Bashir, she was also refreshingly honest about having “postnatal depression.”

In the interview, Diana told Bashir that everyone “was thrilled to bits” when they learned she was expecting a boy (her son William), but that the pregnancy was “difficult.” After William was born, she initially felt better. Later, she unexpectedly experienced much different feelings. 

“Then I was unwell with postnatal depression, which no one ever discusses, postnatal depression, you have to read about it afterwards, and that in itself was a bit of a difficult time,” she said. “You’d wake up in the morning feeling you didn’t want to get out of bed, you felt misunderstood, and just very, very low in yourself.”

Diana’s comments about postpartum depression begin around 8:15.

Diana told Bashir she received a “great deal of treatment” for the disorder, but also felt constantly pressured to be seen as a “successful Princess of Wales,” which made talking about her feelings even harder. She thought some people made her out to appear “unstable.”

“People see it as crying wolf or attention-seeking, and they think because you’re in the media all the time you’ve got enough attention, inverted commas,” she said. “But I was actually crying out because I wanted to get better in order to go forward and continue my duty and my role as wife, mother, Princess of Wales.”

After speaking so openly about postpartum depression, Diana explained that she had self-harmed because of the pressure she faced. When asked how her family reacted to the way she felt, she said she considered that she might have been the first person in the family to speak openly about having depression.

“And obviously that was daunting, because if you’ve never seen it before how do you support it?” she said. 

More and more women continue to come forward to share their experiences with postpartum depression. In 2005, Brooke Shields wrote about her experience in a book titled Down Came the Rain: My Journey Through Postpartum Depression. In March, Chrissy Teigen also revealed she had postpartum depression in a moving essay for Glamour. 

In the essay, Teigen wrote that she thought she’d never have the disorder because she had a “great life” and all the help she could need. Being diagnosed brought her to an important point, though: “Postpartum does not discriminate.”

The HuffPost Parents newsletter, So You Want To Raise A Feminist, offers the latest stories and news in progressive parenting. 

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

The Amazon Takeover Of NYC's Bookstore Scene Continues

Yep, Amazon is opening a brick-and-mortar bookstore in the Big Apple, according to Publishers Weekly.

Don’t worry, that feeling is not déjà vu ― the online megastore had previously announced that it would be opening a bookstore in Manhattan all the way back in January. The new announcement pertains to a second Amazon bookstore in New York City, which is scheduled to open this summer. If all goes according to plan, 2017 should see two Amazon Books opening their doors in Gotham.

An Amazon spokesman confirmed to PW that the store will be on West 34th Street, right across the street from the Empire State Building. As the LA Times points out, this location are within miles of several of the city’s longtime beloved bookshops, including Idlewild Books.

Launching a two-pronged attack on the New York book sales scene makes for a bold move on Amazon’s part. Though indie booksellers have faced tough times since the rise of big chain bookstores and then Amazon, New York City has maintained a relatively vibrant array of bookshops, from the cavernous Strand to the cozy Housing Works. Still, recent years have seen the closure of several of the city’s iconic indies, including St. Mark’s Bookshop and Brooklyn’s BookCourt, as well as big chain stores.

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

Meanwhile, some under-resourced neighborhoods in New York lack any bookstores.

The Bronx Barnes & Noble closed at the end of 2016, leaving millions of the borough’s residents without a local general interest bookstore. A new indie bookstore and wine bar is coming to the Bronx soon, thanks to the tireless efforts and fundraising of bookseller Noëlle Santos.

But don’t count on Amazon for any help; the digital giant has chosen to place its two bookstores in midtown Manhattan, only about 30 blocks apart.

The Amazon Books train is going full steam ahead; according to PW, the company is already hiring “store managers and associates” for the newly announced location.

type=type=RelatedArticlesblockTitle=Related… + articlesList=586d6a00e4b0c56eb4b6ea7f,589b924ae4b04061313b6bb3,586fa74ee4b043ad97e2f5f0,58cc3aa7e4b0be71dcf4bede,58acc348e4b03d80af706cb1,58c807b7e4b0598c6699cd07,58b49a75e4b060480e0b1184

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Paul Ryan’s Ratings Are Crashing

WASHINGTON ― Speaker Paul Ryan’s ratings keep falling in a new Quinnipiac poll released Tuesday.

Only 28 percent of American voters said they feel favorably toward the Wisconsin Republican. Fifty-two percent said they view him unfavorably, an 18-point increase from May 2016.

Ryan’s unfavorable ratings have been rising since December. Even Rasmussen Reports, whose numbers are often more conservative than those of other pollsters, found him with lower ratings in its March 27 poll.

Ryan is most well-liked among Republicans, although only 57 percent of them viewed him favorably in Quinnipiac’s latest poll. Even among demographic groups that have most strongly supported President Donald  Trump ― such as white voters without a college degree, people over the age of 65, and men ― Ryan doesn’t come close to a net positive approval rating.

The speaker’s ratings were lower than those of House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), who had a 30 percent favorability rating. But they were better than those of Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.).

According to HuffPost Pollster’s aggregate, Ryan’s favorability ratings were rising this time last year. His more recent decline tracks closely with that of the Trump administration, which suggests voters are associating Ryan with Trump.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

A Montana Special Election Nobody Is Following Could Deal A Huge Blow To Trump

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

Shortly after the presidential election, Casey Bailey, one of the dwindling number of Democrats in Montana, organized a Facebook group for his neighbors to vent about national politics. The driving question on everybody’s mind for those first weeks and months ― What can we do? ― had no obvious answer. By February, one started to emerge: President Donald Trump had nominated Rep. Ryan Zinke of Montana to be secretary of the Interior Department, and as Zinke rode his horse to his first day on the job, his old job became vacant.

To the surprise of Bailey and much of the rest of Montana, a familiar name emerged in the race to fill the job. Rob Quist, the legendary banjo-strumming folk singer with a populist streak and a penchant for public service, was running as a Democrat for Zinke’s seat.

Democrats chose their nominee at a state convention, where, as the first ballot turned to the second and then third, it gradually became apparent that Quist was deadly serious. He had barnstormed the state, urging locals to set up county parties, get active and come vote for him at the state convention. Bailey, whose journey into political activism had begun with a simple Facebook page, found himself a delegate at the gathering. The 37-year-old organic grain farmer cast his vote for Quist, who won on the fourth ballot.

In a state with 56 counties, at least six saw new Democratic central committees pop up in response to Quist’s statewide tour, said Nancy Keenan, the executive director of the Montana Democratic Party.

When Quist arrived last month in Fort Benton, Chouteau County’s biggest town, nearly 70 people gathered to hear him speak.

“We’re a very Republican, red, conservative area,” Bailey told The Huffington Post by phone in a recent interview, describing the first rally they held with Quist in March. “I was like, ‘Holy cow!’”

Now, his rallies regularly draw hundreds. It’s precisely the kind of organizing Democrats say is essential to rebuilding the party and taking back power. But back in Washington, Democrats are conflicted on how or whether to get involved in the race. Some aren’t following it at all.

Rep. Jim Clyburn (D-S.C.) was the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee’s national mobilization chair in 2016. “Montana special election?” Clyburn said, when HuffPost asked if the DCCC planned to get more involved in the race. Somebody nearby told him the race was to replace Zinke. “Oh, I didn’t know about that,” Clyburn said.

Montana voters will go to the polls on May 25 to choose between Quist and a Republican easily panned as a cartoon plutocrat fresh off a statewide election loss. The president’s approval rating is at 35 percent, and a special-election loss in Montana would be a crushing blow.  

The DCCC is not running ads in Montana, a sign that they see the race as unwinnable and not worth the investment ― and also that they worry any support from national Democrats would make the race a referendum on the two parties. And even with Trump in office, that’s a contest Democrats lose.  

Yet there is an argument to be made that things are different. The population of Helena, Montana, is around 30,000 if everybody is home. On Jan. 21, some 10,000 people filled the streets for the town’s women’s march. Indivisible groups and new county Democratic parties have been popping up. 

Democrats in the state have won before: The party controls the governor’s mansion, and populist rancher Jon Tester is one of Montana’s two senators. Republicans, meanwhile, put up a walking parody of a candidate. In this populist moment, the GOP threw its weight behind Greg Gianforte, a millionaire tech guy from New Jersey who, after moving to Montana, sued to try to keep people from being able to fish in a stream that ran by his property. He is a major proponent of privatizing public land. Since moving to Montana, he has been trying to buy his way into elected office, fresh off a defeat in a bid for governor in which his campaign aired 30,661 television ads, more than any other state candidate in the country. In doing so, Gianforte spent at least $5.1 million of his own money.

The Democratic nomination, meanwhile, has been won by a musician so legendary in the state that Sen. Steve Daines, Montana’s Republican senator, had to begin his denunciation of Quist by saying:

While the DCCC isn’t doing much in Montana yet, Rep. Dan Kildee, who last cycle was the campaign arm’s head of its program to help vulnerable candidates, thinks they should. Asked Tuesday if the campaign arm should be actively involved in Montana, he said they’re moving in that direction. 

“I think we are, from everything that I see, and we had some discussions even this morning,” said Kildee, who is a DCCC program co-chair this term.

“We have to seize this moment and help solidify the current narrative, which is this president and this party, the Republicans, can’t govern and we will all pay the price for that,” said Kildee. “What’s interesting is that there’s interest around the country in these races that normally don’t get any attention beyond their local media market.”

But while the DCCC may be sitting on the sidelines for now, the Democratic National Committee appears to be giving it a much closer look, and plans to send high-profile surrogates there in the coming weeks. 

The unusual energy on the ground, Kildee said, needs to be channeled. It is not a zero sum game, where energy spent now is energy that won’t be there later. “It goes to the point: here’s something you can do. This is a tangible step you can take,” he said.

Trump, Kildee said, changes everything. “He creates an environment where conventional wisdom has to be discarded. Conventional wisdom said he couldn’t get elected, but I don’t think that the wisdom all falls in the same direction. The conventional wisdom is that in Montana, or Georgia, those seats are out of reach for us. I wouldn’t bet on it,” he said.

The absence of national Democrats from the Montana scene, especially compared to the furious effort underway on behalf of Jon Ossoff in suburban Atlanta, seems like a symptom of a party that is still awfully sick, despite the energy boost it’s gotten from an enlivened resistance movement. Ossoff has raised about $4 million for his campaign, which New York magazine dubbed “the Trump-hate weathervane.” Quist, by contrast, has raised more than $750,000 and has a 16-year record of financial troubles, including debts that went into collection and a lawsuit by a bank over an unpaid loan.  

Quist uses his own financial struggles as a way to connect to everyday Montanans. He is a first-time politician but has been known to the state for decades: first as a high-school basketball champ, then a University of Montana player, then in his music career, then through his public school activism and other civic engagement.

Staying out of the race, according to one school of thought, saves not just money, but face. “Democratic Party operatives have over-learned two lessons: first, if they do not compete somewhere, no one they care about will think they `lost.’ And if all of their actual losses are lost conventionally, their conventional career will continue upwards,” said Jeff Hauser, a longtime Democratic operative who does not endorse losing as a strategy. “Basically, losing the same way your predecessors lost is solid career advice for Democratic Party operatives.”

Quist is running as a populist and supports a single-payer health care system, but his campaign bristles at comparisons to Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), whom Quist backed in the Democratic presidential primary. In his first TV ad, launched Tuesday, he calls single-payer “health care we can afford.” He’s ardently pro-choice and opposes defunding Planned Parenthood, framing it as a fight against government intrusion into people’s personal lives. He understands climate change, but couches his belief with the exact same anecdote used by Zinke ― a story about watching the ice in Glacier National Park recede year after year.

“We Democrats win in Montana on the margins,” Keenan said. “We need a strong base turnout, to pull independents and a handful of Republicans to win here. We don’t look at what happened in ‘16 as indicative of what will happen.”

“Every race, every cycle, is a new day,” she added. “We go into those battles fighting to win. Some we win, some we lose, and the national attention on this race is the national attention they want to give out to us here.”

For Quist, that means keeping the campaign focused on local issues. So, he made public land access the cornerstone of his platform, hoping to make it an issue wedge between Gianforte and Republican voters. 

We Democrats win in Montana on the margins. We need a strong base turnout, to pull independents and a handful of Republicans to win here.
Nancy Keenan, executive director of the Montana Democratic Party

In a state where the federal government owns 29 percent of all acreage, access to public lands is a major issue. During the election, Republicans hounded the Obama administration for setting aside large swaths of land, particularly in the West, for conservation. On the first day of the 115th Congress, House Republicans made it easier to sell off public lands by voting to change how the government calculates the cost of transferring those parcels to states or private developers. The move cleared the way for auctioning 3.3 million acres of wilderness, an area roughly the size of Connecticut. In nearby Utah, state Republicans are urging the Trump administration to take unprecedented action to try to reverse a national monument designation made in the waning days of the Obama presidency.

“Rob Quist is just reading from a sheet of false attacks his handlers gave him,” Shane Scanlon, a spokesman for Gianforte, told HuffPost by phone. “Greg’s a strong supporter of our public lands.”

“Montanans can always count on Greg to protect our public lands because he believes they should stay in public hands,” he added, cribbing a rhyming slogan used against Gianforte by Democrats during his gubernatorial run. 

Last month, Trump signed an executive order lifting a temporary ban on federal coal leasing. The move could boost the industry in Montana, which was already projected to see a bump in production over the next two years as coal regains some of the utility sector amid rising natural gas prices.

But Gianforte makes it easy for Montana Democrats to paint him as a caricature of an out-of-touch rich guy. He has donated repeatedly to organizations that push to sell off public lands ― including a $27,500 contribution to the Foundation for Research on Economics and the Environment, a top national advocate for federal land transfer ― a fact Democrats have played up. Public land access became a touchstone issue during Gianforte’s gubernatorial race, during which Democrats skewered him as a “millionaire from New Jersey” who thinks “they’re able to negotiate our rights away if they send us threatening letters, if they sue us or just if they intimidate us in some way.”

“I’ve been standing up for wild lands and public lands all my life,” Quist said. “The state would be solidly behind me on this. Quite frankly, this is the reason I’m in the race. This a huge issue for me.”  

Still, Gianforte has deep pockets and serious name recognition. His gubernatorial bid turned out to be a close race; Gianforte won 46.4 percent of the vote to incumbent Gov. Steve Bullock’s 50.3 percent. He has refused to disclose his net worth, but he reported income of $220.5 million between 2005 and 2014 on his tax returns. He sold his company RightNow Technologies in 2011 to software giant Oracle Corp. for $1.5 billion.

Quist isn’t running as a complete political novice, either. He served three four-year terms on the Montana Arts Council, to which two governors appointed him. He lobbied to keep funding for music, theater and arts programs in the state’s public schools and developed an anti-bullying curriculum. He also served as the state Department of Commerce’s cultural ambassador, traveling to Japan several times over his three-year tenure. He currently works as a spokesman and fundraiser for the Montana Food Bank Network.

Quist rose to prominence as a founding member of the Mission Mountain Wood Band. The country-rock fivesome, sometimes abbreviated M2WB, helped start the University of Montana’s annual Aber Day kegger, a party that earned a spot in Guinness Book of World Records for being the biggest benefit kegger.

“That was always the most epic engagement we played,” Quist said. “Even though we traveled all over the country, that was the one we looked forward to.”

After spending a Saturday afternoon canvassing for Quist in Fort Benton, the biggest town in Chouteau County, Bailey said he felt optimistic about his chances. “Rob Quist has the energy and the momentum, and people don’t really like Greg Gianforte,” he said. “To me, I think he’s got it. But people still have to vote.”

The special election is scheduled for the middle of the week in a month when voters don’t typically go to the polls. Temperatures are expected to be about 37 degrees Fahrenheit. The forecast includes rain.

“The election is on a Thursday, and springtime is tough because people aren’t thinking about voting,” Bailey said. “And, traditionally, Republicans just turn out more mechanically to vote around here.”

Take a survey: Should the national Democratic Party jump into the Montana special election or sit it out? 

CORRECTION: This story misnamed Rep. Dan Kildee as Dale Kildee. Dale, a former congressman from Michigan, is Dan’s uncle. It also misidentified Kildee’s title within the DCCC. 

type=type=RelatedArticlesblockTitle=Related Coverage + articlesList=58bdd0eae4b033be14679775,58b11732e4b060480e0841d1,58b0952ae4b060480e07d132,58dfcabfe4b0b3918c83efcb

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Donald Trump Kicks Off Sexual Assault Awareness Month By Defending Bill O'Reilly

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

President Donald Trump said he doesn’t think Fox News host Bill O’Reilly, who has been accused of sexual harassment by several women, did anything wrong.

In an interview with The New York Times on Wednesday, Trump defended O’Reilly after the Times reported that O’Reilly or Fox News paid five women a total of about $13 million to settle claims of sexual harassment or inappropriate behavior over the years.

“I think he’s a person I know well — he is a good person,” Trump said on Wednesday.

“I think he shouldn’t have settled; personally, I think he shouldn’t have settled,” Trump added. “Because you should have taken it all the way. I don’t think Bill did anything wrong.”

O’Reilly has so far stayed silent on the scandal, despite losing at least 15 advertisers for “The O’Reilly Factor,” his primetime Fox News show.

Trump’s comments echo statements he made about former Fox News chief Roger Ailes in July 2016, amid another sexual harassment scandal at the network. Trump claimed Ailes’ accusers had received help from Ailes and then said “these horrible things about him.”

“It’s very sad. Because he’s a very good person. I’ve always found him to be just a very, very good person. And by the way, a very, very talented person. Look what he’s done. So I feel very badly,” Trump told NBC.

More than a dozen women have accused Trump himself of sexual assault. Trump called them liars and threatened to sue them after the 2016 presidential election ended, but so far has taken no legal action.

The Washington Post unearthed a video in October of Trump claiming he can grab women “by the pussy” because he is a celebrity. He dismissed the comment, which was made in 2005, as “locker room talk.”

Last week, Trump declared April National Sexual Assault Awareness and Prevention Month.  

Read more at The New York Times.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

David Bowie Is As Iconic As Ever In These Eclectic Glamour Shots

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

Some of the most iconic rock ‘n’ roll images can be credited to Mick Rock, a British photographer best known for capturing Joan Jett, Blondie, Talking Heads, Queen, Lou Reed, The Sex Pistols and more staples of the London and New York music scenes. Rock’s defining subject was David Bowie, who became close friends with Rock and recruited him to direct the music videos for “Space Oddity” and “Life on Mars.”

The Huffington Post has an exclusive clip and photos from the new documentary “SHOT! The Psycho-Spiritual Mantra of Rock,” which chronicles Rock’s life. Above, watch the photographer discuss the origins of his relationship with Bowie. Below, peruse images of Bowie and his contemporaries.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

A Swimsuit Designer Tried To Shame Amy Schumer, And Women Weren't Having It

Come for every woman’s right to wear a swimsuit, and you’d best prepare to feel wrath as hot as the beach. 

Dana Duggan, a swimwear designer from Massachusetts who believes Amy Schumer shouldn’t wear a bathing suit, was dragged by a handful of wise women after she shared this opinion in the comments section of InStyle’s Instagram account

The magazine posted a photo of its May “beauty issue” cover, which features Schumer looking great in a white Ralph Lauren one-piece. “Come on now!” Duggan wrote under the account of her South Shore Swimwear brand. “You could not find anyone better for this cover? Not everyone should be in a swimsuit.”

Oh, Ms. Duggan. Where to begin? 

Naturally, some of the mag’s followers were quick to clap back. One reminded Duggan that “swimwear is not just for women who are a size 2! She is a real woman with a real body. Bravo to @instylemagazine for showcasing her. She looks beautiful.”

Another commenter wrote she feels sorry for anyone who dislikes the cover, as well as “all the other people you judge and shame for their bodies.”

Duggan stood by her tone-deaf opinion in the comments, citing “freedom of speech” and adding that Schumer looks “like a pig.”

Duggan started her swimwear business in the late 1990s, according to a 2012 profile in the Quincy, Massachusetts Patriot Ledger. Her Facebook page says her business is by appointment only, though it is not currently accepting appointments. As recently as 2015, she was sharing swimwear shopping advice for women with different body types in Boston magazine. 

Shocked that a swimwear designer would balk at any woman wearing a bathing suit ― much less a size 6-8 woman like Schumer ― we reached out to Duggan. As she requested we include that “The Huffington Post is the biggest piece of crap publication out there,” she stood by her words. 

“I appreciate the free press. It’s called Freedom of Speech,” she said. “I can have my opinion and you can have yours. I’m tired of the media and publications trying to push the FAT agenda. It’s not healthy and it’s not pretty. What is wrong with featuring healthy and fit cover models?”

For starters, unless you’re a doctor you really have no business commenting on someone’s health. No one has any idea at all how “healthy and fit” someone is based on their appearance. And if Duggan’s idea of a more acceptable magazine cover includes exclusively promoting the unrealistic standards of beauty that women have been harmfully conditioned to believe are normal and aspirational for decades, she is quite frankly on the wrong side of the beach volleyball net

Lastly, if anyone really still needs a reminder of who should and should not be wearing a swimsuit, might we suggest checking this handy infographic

We’d go on forever, but commenter @Kristinbarnett9 really summed it up best. 

You are entitled to your opinion, I never said you weren’t, but that doesn’t mean you are right! “Some people just don’t belong in a swimsuit???” I guess when I say I feel sorry for you, I also mean I feel sorry for you having some person or event in your life that made you think your self-worth is based on your size, and if you aren’t perfect that you should hide or not participate in everyday events. We have the freedom of speech in America, true, but I don’t think our forefathers realized they needed an asterisk adding *even though you can speak freely, that doesn’t always mean you should. Doing so could result in you looking like a shallow idiot.

Because buying anything from South Shore Swimwear seems impossible even if you wanted to, check out some of our favorite swimwear brands for women of all shapes and sizes instead. 

type=type=RelatedArticlesblockTitle=Related… + articlesList=55f35901e4b042295e367a07,570e4281e4b0ffa5937d99fe,5725179fe4b0b49df6ab7d2a

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Harvard Students Protest Donald Trump Just Like Harry Potter Would

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

A group of graduate students at Harvard University’s John F. Kennedy School of Government have created a “Resistance School” for training progressive activists to combat President Donald Trump’s agenda.

What started out as a few post-inauguration conversations between friends about Trump’s rise to power evolved into a four-week series of free political advocacy and grassroots mobilization workshops scheduled throughout April.

“We were trying to figure out what we wanted to do with the political energy and activism that we were seeing in this country,” said Shanoor Seervai, a second-year public policy student and one of the group’s 11 co-founders. “We sort of came up with doing something that was really focused on skill-based training to sustain our movement.”

Members of the Resistance School, which is entirely student-run and has no official affiliation with Harvard, have light-heartedly compared the group to “Dumbeldore’s Army,” a reference to the “Harry Potter” series and its collective of wizarding students who meet in secret to practice fighting dark magic.

“It came up as a joke, and I think something about our logo feels Harry Potter-esque,” said Yasmin Radjy, another co-founder and second-year public policy student. “If it engages more people, we’re happy with it.”

At least 5,000 groups from six continents and all 50 states have signed up for Resistance School, according to the group’s Facebook page, which has amassed more than 4,500 followers.

Groups big and small, including 700 moms in Boise, Idaho, and the Boulder County Democratic Party in Colorado, have already registered. Radjy called growing interest in the Resistance School “unbelievable” and “exciting,” noting that the club originally expected just a couple hundred friends and families to sign up. 

“Our bottom line is that we want as many people who are either new to the political process or have experience to get involved ― and not just in a behind their-computers-alone sort of way,” Radjy said. “We think that political action requires face-to-face conversation.”

Experts in public policy and advocacy, including former campaign staffers for Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and former President Barack Obama, will organize and participate in the sessions.

Registration for in-person attendance is currently at capacity, but people who can’t physically attend can still view the livestreamed events on Resistance School’s Facebook page or website.

The first session, titled “How to Communicate our Values in Political Advocacy,” will be led by historian, author and Harvard public policy lecturer Timothy McCarthy and is planned for Wednesday at 7 p.m. Eastern time.

“This past election was a wake-up call for policies that have been hurting families across this country for much longer and have been undermining progressive values for a long time at local and state levels,” Radjy said. “We want to keep the embers of the resistance alive.”

How will Trump’s first 100 days impact you? Sign up for our weekly newsletter and get breaking updates on Trump’s presidency by messaging us here.

type=type=RelatedArticlesblockTitle=Related Coverage + articlesList=58767cdfe4b03c8a02d4c93a,58c15502e4b054a0ea685488,58e394b0e4b0f4a923b1cea4

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Bill O'Reilly Once Said Female Anchors Should Be 'Good-Looking Babe[s]'

Advertisers are currently fleeing from Fox News host Bill O’Reilly’s show, “The O’Reilly Factor,” as sexual harassment claims against the TV personality have resurfaced.

Earlier this week, The New York Times published an investigation that revealed both O’Reilly and his network have paid about $13 million in settlements relating to sexual harassment allegations over the period of his employment. Throughout the years, multiple women have claimed O’Reilly acted inappropriately toward them.

O’Reilly has denied the various allegations — with support from President Donald Trump. “I think he shouldn’t have settled; personally I think he shouldn’t have settled,” Trump said during an interview at the Oval Office Wednesday. “I don’t think Bill did anything wrong.”

But regardless of the new information, O’Reilly already has a documented history of troubling and sexist relationships to women that should have made advertisers queasy a long time ago.

The Huffington Post just resurfaced a frustrating example of O’Reilly on the record where the host expressed that female anchors should be sexy and embrace their looks, saying, “Eleanor Roosevelt is not going to be anchoring your weekend news, OK?”

The statement came in 2002, after his former colleague at Fox News, Paula Zahn, got frustrated that CNN advertised her new show on that network, “American Morning” as “sexy.”

According to a report from the Los Angeles Times, O’Reilly told reporters that Zahn was just being politically correct. “If Paula Zahn doesn’t think she’s there partially because she’s a good-looking babe, then she’s in never-never land,” he said.

If Paula Zahn doesn’t think she’s there partially because she’s a good-looking babe, then she’s in never-never land.
Bill O’Reilly

Here’s the CNN advertisement in question:

After longtime television executive Roger Ailes lost his job last year over sexual harassment allegations from employees, 21st Century Fox claimed that such behavior would never be tolerated again.

“The O’Reilly Factor” is still scheduled to air a new episode tonight.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.