Twitter May Allow Users To Watch Live Pay-TV Channels In Its App


Twitter has gradually been transforming itself into a destination for online video streaming, whether it be for red carpet shows of major Hollywood events or sporting fixtures, the company has arrived on the live streaming scene. According to a new report, the company is also working on allowing its users to watch live pay-TV channels from within its app.

According to a report published by The Telegraph, Twitter is interested in signing deals with networks such as ESPN as part of its video streaming ambitions. Users will obviously require a subscription to watch live pay-TV channels inside the Twitter app.

This means that in markets where this service goes like, customers who already have TV subscribers will be able to link them with their Twitter accounts so that they can access paid-for channels inside the Twitter app.

This is going to enable Twitter users to watch live sports games or TV premieres on Twitter while they interact with the community by reading and posting tweets about whatever it is they’re watching. The idea will be to make the viewing experience more social.

Twitter can’t broadcast major sporting events as the rights to those are often held closely by TV companies. If it’s able to work out an arrangement of this sort, it would eliminate that hurdle and allow it to stream the events live for paying TV customers.

Twitter May Allow Users To Watch Live Pay-TV Channels In Its App , original content from Ubergizmo. Read our Copyrights and terms of use.

Apple Is ‘Completely Rethinking’ The Mac Pro


It has been a while since Apple said anything about its plans for the Mac Pro and the company is finally breaking its silence about this product today. Apple’s Phil Schiller has confirmed that the company is “completely rethinking the Mac Pro” after the product was last refreshed back in 2013. Apple is working on an entirely new Mac Pro but it has pointed out that the new product won’t be released in 2017.

Schiller confirmed that Apple is working on a completely new Mac Pro in an interview with BuzzFeed News. He pointed out that the company is hard at work creating this new product and also mentioned that a separate pro display is being worked on as well.

Schiller didn’t confirm when both products are going to arrive. The teams that are working on these new products have been told to take their time designing the new Mac Pro so that they can improve upon some of the design issues of the current model.

Even Apple’s Craig Federighi that the company designed itself “into a bit of a corner” by going with a circular shape for the Mac Pro. “We wanted to do something bold and different. What we didn’t appreciate completely at the time was how we had so tailored that design to a specific vision that in the future we would find ourselves a bit boxed in — into a circular shape,” he added.

Apple isn’t saying anything more about the new Mac Pro so there’s no word on its specifications, expected launch timeframe, and price.

Apple Is ‘Completely Rethinking’ The Mac Pro , original content from Ubergizmo. Read our Copyrights and terms of use.

Spotify’s Free Users Will Now Have To Wait For New Music


Spotify has always provided the same music library to its free and paid users even though free users are limited in terms of features and ease of use. This has been a bone of contention between the popular music streaming service and record labels who don’t really like the fact that it provides non-paying users with access to the latest music. Spotify has now reportedly inked a deal with major record label Universal Music Group which will make some albums available only for premium users at least for a limited time.

What this means is that if your favorite singer is signed with the Universal Music Group and they come out with a new album, chances are that if you’re a free Spotify user you may have to wait for a couple of weeks before you can listen to their new music on Spotify. If you pay $9.99 per month for its Premium service you will be able to access the new album as and when it comes out.

Spotify CEO Daniel Eck confirmed in a statement that “Starting today, Universal artists can choose to release new albums on premium only for two weeks,” adding that this will provide subscribers an earlier chance to explore the entire creative work while singles will remain available across Spotify for all users – free and paid alike- to enjoy.

So far, Universal is the only major label that appears to have signed this deal with Spotify and it wouldn’t be surprising if the likes of Sony and Warner signed something similar in the very near future.

Spotify’s Free Users Will Now Have To Wait For New Music , original content from Ubergizmo. Read our Copyrights and terms of use.

Samsung Galaxy S8 launcher leaked [APK Download]

It’s time – just before the launch – to gain access to and download the Samsung Galaxy S8’s own Android software launcher. Samsung’s Galaxy S8 has been revealed in full and we’ve got a full Galaxy S8 and S8 Plus Hands-on if you’d like to take a look. For those that want to experience the software for themselves, the APK … Continue reading

James Corden And Stephen Curry Are A Fierce 'Carpool Karaoke' Team

We knew basketball star Stephen Curry had range ― he’s one of the NBA’s best shooters. But did you know he can perform Disney songs like a pro?

Watch the two-time MVP team up with James Corden on “How Far I’ll Go” from  “Moana” and “Love Is an Open Door” from “Frozen” during Monday’s “Carpool Karaoke” on “The Late Late Show.”

Just like he is on the court, Curry remains a showman in the car.

H/T Mashable

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Susan Sarandon Basically Lived 'Feud' IRL With Julia Roberts In 'Stepmom'

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

Besides uncontrollably sobbing after it was over and something about a golden retriever puppy, we don’t remember much about “Stepmom,” the 1998 tearjerker starring Susan Sarandon and Julia Roberts.

But apparently the film was released amid a sea of rumors that the two stars couldn’t stand each other, much like “What Happened to Baby Jane,” the film at the heart of Sarandon and Jessica Lange’s new FX series “Feud” about Bette Davis and Joan Crawford’s famous rivalry.  

On Sunday, Sarandon officially shot down nearly 20-year-old rumors of her alleged feud with Roberts by sharing an Entertainment Weekly article published a month before the film hit theaters addressing the in-fighting.

According to Sarandon, her own PR team was responsible for fueling speculation, a tactic also employed by studios representing Crawford and Davis to help drive profits.

“Press printed that Julia & I hated each other during Stepmom. Found out it was my PR person creating rumors,” Sarandon wrote. 

In the article, both Sarandon and Roberts make light of their supposed distaste for one another by identifying the real culprit behind their “feud”: the public’s tendency to pit women against each other. 

“If you make a movie with a male star everyone assumes you’re f**king. If it’s a female star, everyone assumes you’re fighting,” Sarandon said.

And almost two decades later, Sarandon says she’s still asked about whether she likes her female costars like Lange, even when promoting a series that directly explores the rampant sexism in Hollywood. 

“The #1 question I get in interviews is whether Jessica & I get along,” she tweeted. “Jess & I not only got along great during filming, we’re now dating.”

“ … I mean, staying in touch,” she later clarified. “She’s one of the reasons I agreed to do the series. Working with brilliant actors only makes you better.”

No feud here either, folks. Keep it moving along. 

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

GOP Wants To Weaken Safety Rules At Chemical Plants Issued After Deadly Texas Explosion

WASHINGTON ― Republicans in Congress are moving to repeal safety regulations issued by the Obama administration in the wake of the deadly 2013 explosion at a fertilizer plant in West, Texas.

The House GOP is expected to take up a bill soon that would prevent the Environmental Protection Agency from moving forward with its new chemical safety regulations this year as planned. A companion bill has already been introduced in the Senate.

If approved by Congress and signed by President Donald Trump, the legislation would forbid the EPA from ever issuing similar rules again.

“I wish I could say I am shocked that Republicans attempting to undo this progress are prioritizing profits over workplace safety,” said Rep. Don Beyer, a Virginia Democrat. “Sadly, this is reflective of the Trump Administration’s efforts to put well-heeled private interests ahead of public safety.”

The chemical safety rule is one of more than 30 regulations issued late in Barack Obama’s presidency that Republicans have sought to quash using an arcane tool called the Congressional Review Act. That law enables Congress to pass “resolutions of disapproval” undoing significant federal rules before they take effect.

Such resolutions only require a simple majority to pass in the Senate, leaving the Democratic minority unable to filibuster them. The GOP-controlled Congress has sent more than a dozen repeals to Trump already, covering everything from pollution to gun control to workplace safety. The president has signed eight of them so far and is expected to eventually approve all of the ones that land on his desk. 

Until this year, the Congressional Review Act had only been used successfully once, in 2001. But with the GOP controlling both chambers of Congress as well as the White House, it has become the go-to tool for dismantling new regulations opposed by businesses and their lobbies.

The Obama administration began pursuing the chemical safety reforms in 2013 after the infamous Texas explosion killed 15 people, 12 of them first responders, and destroyed much of the surrounding community. In their official investigation on the incident, federal officials discovered safety lapses by the company and its insurers, as well as shortcomings in oversight by federal and state agencies.

The new regulation that Republicans want to scuttle was meant to address lapses by the EPA in its risk management program. Among other changes, the new regulations would require facilities covered by the law to study whether they could be using safer technologies to protect workers and the surrounding community. It would also require facilities that have had accidents to pay for safety audits performed by independent third parties.

In other words, companies would be expected to help fund some of the safety improvements.

Lobbies for the chemical and petroleum industries asked the Trump administration to temporarily stop the rules from going into effect. EPA head Scott Pruitt, who sued the agency repeatedly before being plucked to lead it, obliged. Now Congress may block the rule for good.

Jordan Barab, a former official at the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, wrote on his blog that businesses have tried to block the rule by citing the possibility that the explosion in West was sparked by arson, as opposed to a breakdown in corporate accountability. Barab said the arson issue is a red herring.

“They don’t want to pay for the safeguards that are needed and they don’t want any stinkin’ government agencies telling them how to do their business,” he wrote.

When the EPA rolled out its reforms, it noted that the disaster in West, Texas, was just one of many deadly chemical plant mishaps in recent years. According to the agency, over the past decade there have been more than 1,500 accidents, including 60 deaths, at facilities covered by the risk management program.

The Trump administration has not said explicitly what it will do with a repeal of the EPA rule if it’s passed by Congress, but all the signals so far suggest Trump will sign it. The White House has launched a full-scale assault on federal regulations, including executive orders that make it harder for federal agencies to issue new rules. Trump has said he wants to repeal two regulations for every new one that goes into effect.

The new president has shown little love for chemical safety regulations in particular. In fact, his proposed budget would wipe out the U.S. Chemical Safety Board, which is responsible for investigating accidents and enforcing safety laws.

Sign up for the HuffPost Must Reads newsletter. Each Sunday, we will bring you the best original reporting, long form writing and breaking news from The Huffington Post and around the web, plus behind-the-scenes looks at how it’s all made. Click here to sign up!

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Demi Lovato Brought Back 'Poot Lovato,' And We're SCREAMING

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

“Poot Lovato” is arguably the best Lovato, and she’s back in full force.

On Monday night, Demi Lovato sent out a truly iconic GIF of Poot on loop ― no caption necessary:

If you’re unaware of who Poot is, she’s a meme that originally began on Tumblr via user Cstcrpt, who has since deleted their account.

Cstcrpt uploaded a photo of Demi Lovato leaving the Royal Variety Performance at the Palladium Theatre on November 13, 2014 in London, England. The photo was … not taken from the best of angles.

You can see the photo below with Cstcrpt’s caption indicating that it wasn’t Demi at all, but rather Poot.

“Demi’s twin sister. She was locked in a basement her whole life. This picture was taken the first time she went outside. Her name is Poot,” the caption reads.

The photo took off and became an internet phenomenon in 2015, which Lovato was not a fan of. There were hashtags (#FreePootLovato, etc.) and Twitter accounts galore. But the hoopla mostly died down since then as Poot remained dormant.

Luckily, the 24-year-old singer seemed to experience a change of heart about dear old Poot and decided to give her “sister” a well-deserved resurgence. Why? We have no idea! We’re not questioning it because we’re too busy celebrating!

Twitter is, too:

Long live Poot.

 

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Justin Trudeau Nailed This Ryan Gosling-Approved Style Move

By Liza Corsillo for GQ.

Canada’s Prime Minister and one of Canada’s most famous Ryans are both fans of this next-level neckwear move.

It’s rare that a politician and a movie star share tastes in fashion but Justin Trudeau isn’t just any politician, especially when it comes to dressing for a big event. Last night, while delivering a Leonard Cohen tribute speech (could he get any cooler?) onstage at the Juno awards in Ottawa, the PM wore a tie so cool, it’s straight out of the Ryan Gosling Playbook™. Both men are devilishly handsome, both make getting dressed look like a friggin’ cake walk, and both know that wearing an embroidered tie is the freshest way to make your neckwear pop. Whether it’s floral like Gosling’s baby blue tie or graphic like Trudeau’s skinny black tie, the stitched detail gives modern neckwear a vintage appeal. And there’s something relaxed and confident in the diminutive size of the adornment — quite the opposite of a loud allover print or stripe. Neither of these two Canadian style gods feels the need to show off in the wardrobe department, and that’s precisely what makes them look so consistently cool.

RELATED: Ryan Gosling Is Hollywood’s Handsomest, Wittiest, Leadingest Leading Man

As for the rest of Justin Trudeau’s fit, his black and white Reservoir Dogs suit was reminiscent of another stylish leading man in Hollywood. And the stark lack of color made a perfect backdrop for his embroidered tie. If you’re thinking of copying the style this spring, keep your suit and dress shirt colors minimal so your tie has plenty of room to shine. Want to pick up your own embroidered tie right this minute? Here are three we enthusiastically recommend:

More from GQ:

Where Does Battle Over the Dakota Access Pipeline Go From Here?

Why Your Beard Is Red, Even If Your Hair Isn’t

Melania Trump on Her Rise, Family Secrets, and True Political Views

7 Grooming Moves to Steal From Your Favorite Rapper

President Obama and Bill Simmons: The GQ Interview

The Hottest Women of the 21st Century

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Ian McKellen Reveals Why He Turned Down The Role Of Dumbledore In 'Harry Potter'

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

It’s no secret we would have loved seeing Sir Ian McKellen take on the role of Dumbledore in the “Harry Potter” franchise (though, both the late Richard Harris and Michael Gambon were great), but actor revealed why he turned it down. 

In an interview with BBC’s Hardtalk, McKellen explained he was was on the list to take over after Harris’ death, which happened before “The Chamber of Secrets” was released. 

The “Lord of the Rings” actor admitted Harris had criticized his acting in the past, calling him “technically brilliant” but “hollow,” which affected his decision not to join the fantasy franchise. 

“When [Harris] died — he played Dumbledore, the wizard, [while] I played the real wizard [Gandalf], of course — when they called me up and said would I be interested in being in the ‘Harry Potter’ films, they didn’t say what part,” he said. “But I worked out what they were thinking. I couldn’t take over the part from an actor who I’d known didn’t approve of me.”

McKellen has spoken of his disagreements with Harris before. In an interview published by contactmusic.com in 2004, McKellen reportedly said he had expressed interest in appearing in the “Harry Potter” films, but hadn’t heard from producers about a role ― Dumbledore or otherwise.

At the time, he McKellen was already playing Gandalf in “LOTR,” which Harris apparently wasn’t so fond of. Harris was also reportedly upset about rumors McKellen would take over as Dumbledore.

That didn’t seem to faze McKellen, though, who reportedly called Harris “a disappointed man because I had played Gandalf and he had to settle for Dumblewit. Or Dumblebore, I should say.” 

Don’t go yet! Try out our Entertainment newsletter. You’ll get celeb tidbits, late-night highlights, and the latest on TV and movies in your inbox, six days a week.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.