Who’s Going To Pay For Trump’s Wall? How About Nobody.

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

WASHINGTON ― On Day One as president, candidate Donald Trump promised last year, he would start working on his “great wall” along the southern border.

It would be 35 feet tall ― at least. It would be 1,000 miles long, and extend deep enough underground to prevent Mexicans from tunneling beneath it. And it would be impenetrable: “It’s going to be made of hardened concrete, and it’s going to be made of rebar. That’s steel,” he explained to a Virginia audience.

Most important of all: It wouldn’t cost U.S. taxpayers a dime. “Who’s paying for the wall?” Trump would ask in a campaign rally call-and-response favorite. And his fans would answer: “Mexico!”

Now, it turns out, President Trump’s wall may be none of those things. Early specifications call for only an 18-foot wall, although 30 feet is preferable. The material is unspecified, and the Cabinet member in charge of building it has said in some places it might be more a series of sensors than an actual structure. As to who will pay for it, it turns out Mexico is not particularly interested in doing that, leaving U.S. taxpayers on the hook ― if and when work actually starts. Except that Congress isn’t that eager to spend tens of billions of dollars for Trump’s project either.

“Nobody wants to pay for it. What a shock,” said Edward Alden, a research fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations and author of The Closing of the American Border. “The reality is that there’s not much of a constituency for the border wall.”

Rick Wilson, a Republican political consultant and longtime Trump critic who supported Florida Sen. Marco Rubio in the 2016 presidential primary, said Trump successfully wooed the anti-immigrant slice of voters in his party with the wall promise, not knowing or caring whether building it made any sense.

“It was the central promise of his campaign. He’s going to build a wall, and make Mexico pay for it,” Wilson said. “He will never get this done. This is never happening.”

Trump and his White House have projected mixed signals in recent days about his level of interest in construction money for the wall, as Congress tries to pass a funding bill to keep the federal government operating past Friday. Last week, Trump’s budget director raised alarms among GOP leaders on Capitol Hill by suggesting that Trump was insisting that this funding bill include money for his wall ― increasing the risk of a government shutdown that would reflect badly on Republicans who control both chambers of Congress as well as the White House.

Trump tweeted on Sunday: “Eventually, but at a later date so we can get started early, Mexico will be paying, in some form, for the badly needed border wall.”

The next day, he followed up with a twopart tweet: “The Wall is a very important tool in stopping drugs from pouring into our country and poisoning our youth (and many others)! If the wall is not built, which it will be, the drug situation will NEVER be fixed the way it should be!”

That same evening, though, he told conservative media outlets that he’s OK with holding off on seeking congressional funding for it until the new fiscal year ― only to follow up the next morning with a new tweet responding to the resulting news stories: “Don’t let the fake media tell you that I have changed my position on the WALL. It will get built and help stop drugs, human trafficking etc.”

Making progress toward building his southern border wall is not the only campaign promise Trump has failed to deliver on. He has not repealed the Affordable Care Act, torn up the nuclear deal with Iran, or labeled China a currency manipulator ― among a long list of other unaccomplished Day One and Day 100 goals.

Still, building the wall was among Trump’s first promises when he began his unlikely presidential bid, as was his repeated insistence that Mexico would somehow pay for it.

“I would build a great wall, and nobody builds walls better than me, believe me, and I’ll build them very inexpensively. I will build a great, great wall on our southern border,” he said while announcing his candidacy at Trump Tower, following his now-famous ride down the escalator. “And I will have Mexico pay for that wall.”

As Mexican officials ― including, famously, former President Vicente Fox ― said Mexico absolutely would not pay for Trump’s wall, Trump just grew more combative. “Yeah, get your money ready, because you’re going to pay for the wall,” Trump said on Fox News last May.

What played well as campaign theater, though, appears to be less effective in real life. Trump never offered a logical reason for the Mexican government to pay for a border wall that it did not want ― a fact Trump seemed to acknowledge when he met with current President Enrique Peña Nieto last summer and failed to discuss the issue.

Now, three months into his presidency, Trump has few realistic options for making Mexico pay. Early on, White House press secretary Sean Spicer floated the idea of a specific tax on Mexican products or using proceeds from a House plan to impose a tariff on imports generally ― but economists quickly pointed out that American consumers, not foreign governments, would be paying those taxes.

Nevertheless, even as congressional Republicans prepared a funding bill with no new money for Trump’s wall, Trump himself continued to insist that it would happen ― at some point.

“The wall gets built ― 100 percent,” he told reporters Tuesday.

Unlike last week, when his staff was saying the money would be in the coming funding bill, Trump on Tuesday would not specify when the money would be available ― meaning that the start of the new fiscal year on Oct. 1 could be his next realistic shot.

That would be Day 255. Not Day One.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Congress Is Close To Passing A Permanent Fix For Coal Miner Health Benefits

WASHINGTON ― Lawmakers say they are very close to passing a permanent health care fix for retired coal miners and their widows.

But it could all fall apart if the pay-for ultimately offered by the House is a poison pill that Democrats are unwilling to swallow.  

The Senate is ready either to pull money from the Abandoned Mine Land fund, increase customs fees on imported goods, or do both to pay for the fix. But after repeatedly delaying a permanent fix, House Republicans are still debating how to pay for the health benefits, which are set to expire in a matter of days.

Rep. David McKinley (R-W.Va.) said Wednesday that GOP leadership is committed to passing a permanent fix, despite recent talk that House Republicans were instead floating a 20-month or four-year extension. The plan is to attach the fix to the omnibus spending bill Congress needs to pass by the end of the week to keep the government open.

Standing alongside retired miners outside of the Capitol, McKinley and Sens. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.), Shelley Moore Capito (R-W.Va.) and Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) said it’s time for the federal government to finally make good on a 70-year-old promise to protect United Mine Workers’ health benefits.

“I think it’s going to happen,” McKinley said of a permanent fix for the 22,000 miners who stand to lose their health care at midnight on Friday if Congress doesn’t act.

What they’re worried about now is just the pay-for,” he said, admitting that he has yet to see language on a potential funding mechanism from House GOP leadership.

McKinley sounded confident that House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) is now supportive of pushing through a permanent funding solution for the miners ― a notable shift from just a few months ago.

“Paul Ryan has agreed to having a permanent fix, he just wants to have a comfort level with the pay-for,” Manchin said.

“We’re hearing more good things today versus three months ago coming from the Speaker’s office,” said Brown.

Manchin urged President Donald Trump in a phone call Wednesday morning to call congressional leaders on the Hill to tell them to get the miner fix done.

“I said: ‘Mr. President, this is the time we need you to help push it over the line,” Manchin told reporters.

Pressed on whether they would vote against any government funding bill that includes anything less than a permanent fix for the miners, the lawmakers wouldn’t go so far as to threaten a shutdown. But they did hint they’d draw the fight out.

“We don’t think it will come to a vote without a permanent fix,” Manchin said of the government funding bill. “The permanent fix will be in a vote.”

Brown admitted, though, that they will watch the House.

“We need to keep the pressure on the House,” he said. “The Senate’s locked in; the House is close.”

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

18 Adorable Mother's Day Gifts For Moms Who Love To Travel

Know a mom who’s always on the move? Luckily, there are plenty of Mother’s Day options to satisfy her wanderlust. 

From practical options like luggage tags and travel journals to accessories like jewelry, the gifts below are for moms who always have their next destination in mind. 

Here are 18 Mother’s Day gifts for moms who love to travel:

The HuffPost Parents newsletter, So You Want To Raise A Feminist, offers the latest stories and news in progressive parenting. 

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

These Epic GIFs Show 'Romy And Michele' Was About Friendship AND Fashion

function onPlayerReadyVidible(e){‘undefined’!=typeof HPTrack&&HPTrack.Vid.Vidible_track(e)}!function(e,i){if(e.vdb_Player){if(‘object’==typeof commercial_video){var a=”,o=’m.fwsitesection=’+commercial_video.site_and_category;if(a+=o,commercial_video[‘package’]){var c=’&m.fwkeyvalues=sponsorship%3D’+commercial_video[‘package’];a+=c}e.setAttribute(‘vdb_params’,a)}i(e.vdb_Player)}else{var t=arguments.callee;setTimeout(function(){t(e,i)},0)}}(document.getElementById(‘vidible_1’),onPlayerReadyVidible);

Can you believe it’s been 20 years since Romy and Michele interpretive danced their way into our hearts?

”Romy and Michele’s High School Reunion,” the quirky comedy about two friends who are equal parts Mary and Rhoda, was released on April 25, 1997. Lisa Kudrow and Mira Sorvino are the film’s stars, but their outfits were main characters, too. 

Fashion is threaded throughout the film and the duo’s friendship. Whether it was their “Vogue-approved” handmade reunion outfits or quirky workout gear costume designer Mona May said would have been made by Romy and Michele themselves, these pals communicated through clothing as much as their absurd, highly quotable dialogue.  

Their closets were colorful treasure troves.

Their accessories were on point.

Their workout clothes were perfect.

Their road-tripping attire was second to none…

…and so was their partywear.

Their final reunion looks put everyone else to shame…

…but they looked totally babely in business casual, too. 

Even their laundry outfits were fun.

On the 20th anniversary of this fun-loving film, grab your bestie, fold some scarves and remember, you don’t have to have invented post-it notes to be total fashion icons. Just be yourselves. 

type=type=RelatedArticlesblockTitle=Related… + articlesList=560c5e12e4b076812700b366,56e99fc2e4b0860f99db4903,58b5904ce4b060480e0bf30a

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Trump's Tax Proposal Would Be Ridiculously Good For Rich People

WASHINGTON ― President Donald Trump’s top economic advisers on Wednesday proposed trillions of dollars in tax cuts for millionaires under a plan billed as the biggest tax reform in over 30 years.

In a one-page statement of “principles” for tax reform provided to reporters, the administration offered few specifics. They did insist on three major perks for the wealthy, however ― reducing the tax rate on stocks, bonds and real estate investments; eliminating inheritance taxes for millionaire heirs and heiresses; and bringing down the tax rate on the largest corporations to less than half of what it is now.

The inheritance tax ― disparaged by conservatives as a “death tax” ― only applies to millionaires. Magnates must will at least $5.45 million to their heirs ($10.9 million for couples) to qualify for the tax. Heirs and heiresses pay an average rate of 16.6 percent on these inheritances, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, generating about $275 billion for the government over 10 years.

Trump would also repeal the 3.8 percent tax on stocks, bonds and real estate investments that Obamacare imposed on individuals making at least $200,000 a year. A full 90 percent of this tax break would accrue to households making at least $700,000 a year, which would receive an average tax cut of $25,000 a year, according to the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center.

Corporate tax cuts also disproportionately favor the wealthy, because corporate profits flow to the owners of corporate stocks, who tend to be rich. More than 92.8 percent of households making at least $250,000 a year own at least $10,000 in stock, according to research from New York University economist Edward N. Wolff, compared with just 19.1 percent of households that earn $25,000 to $49,999. Households in the top 1 percent receive an average of 36 percent of their income from capital gains (stocks, bonds and other financial investments), according to the Congressional Budget Office, while those in the lowest 20 percent receive an average of about 5 percent of their income this way.

Slashing the corporate tax rate from 35 percent to 15 percent would cost the federal government $2.4 trillion, according to the Tax Policy Center.

The Trump team also said they want to “simplify” the number of tax brackets from seven to three, reducing the top rate from 39.6 percent to 35 percent. Trump’s team did not specify what income levels would apply to the new brackets, but fewer tax brackets typically result in lower taxes on upper-income individuals. They further said they would protect deductions for mortgage interest, a perk that disproportionately benefits the wealthy, delivering larger benefits to people who buy bigger houses. And Trump said he would double the standard deduction, which would exclude more household income from taxation.

The 15 percent corporate tax rate would also apply to so-called “pass-through” corporations. Some pass-through corporations are small businesses. Others, however, are hedge funds, law firms, or vehicles for wealthy people to collect specialty income like book royalties.

The plan would also eliminate the Alternative Minimum Tax, which generally benefits the well-off.

Other details of the tax plan will be hashed out in negotiations with Congress. The administration did not offer a legislative timeline for its tax agenda, which will almost certainly meet with staunch opposition from Democrats on Capitol Hill.

Trump’s advisers claimed that economic growth of 3 percent would pay for the trillions of dollars in proposed tax cuts. It would not.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

'Danger Zone' turns the best part of 'Burnout' into a full game

It’s been nine long years since we had a proper Burnout game. But when Paradise launched back in 2008 it didn’t come with the franchise’s trademark Crash Mode, the arcadey feature that tasked players with hurtling themselves through an intersection t…

Spotify's latest move shows it's trying to get royalties right

Spotify has struggled with unpaid royalties recently, though it’s promised to fix things to help support frustrated artists. The company recently limited its free streaming option to build trust with music creators. In addition, Spotify just acquired…

All the Science Fiction and Fantasy TV to Watch (or Avoid) This Summer

When summer comes, it brings with it lazy days in the sun and kids free of school. It also brings a slew of TV shows, perfect for watching when it’s too hot to leave the air conditioning (which is most of the time). Here’s the io9 guide to everything our beloved nerdy genres are putting up this year.

Read more…

Isn't It Relevant That the Star of The Handmaid's Tale Belongs to a Secretive, Allegedly Oppressive Religion? 

The Handmaid’s Tale is one of the finest dystopian novels ever written, and it is, inescapably and fundamentally, about women’s oppression under an ultra-conservative regime. The much-anticipated Hulu series based on the book doesn’t shy away from the original subject matter; it couldn’t, really, and remain the

Read more…

FCC Chair Ajit Pai Announces Bullshit Plan to Destroy Net Neutrality

The agonizing wait is finally over. Today, FCC Chairman Ajit Pai announced his plan to dismantle net neutrality. During a speech in Washington, DC at the conservative nonprofit Freedomworks, Pai outlined his plan to roll back the 2015 Open Internet Order. The order established the principles of the open internet in…

Read more…