Hasta La Gadget!

The United States is home to many underwater treasures: the haunting shipwrecks of Thunder Bay, the colorful corals of Gray’s Reef, the barnacle-covered statue of Christ in the Florida Keys.

For most Americans, however, these sights are out of reach. Though half of the U.S. population lives within 50 miles of a coast, only a tiny fraction — fewer than 5 percent, according to some industry estimates — actively dive or snorkel.

But thanks to an online project spearheaded by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, everyone can now experience these underwater wonders in vivid detail. Diving knowledge isn’t required and you won’t even get wet; all you need is a smartphone, tablet or computer.

The Virtual Dive Gallery, launched earlier this month, allows users to explore U.S. national marine sanctuaries online. There are currently 360-degree, virtual reality images of five sanctuaries available: the ship graveyard of Thunder Bay in Lake Huron, the Florida Keys, Gray’s Reef in Georgia, Flower Garden Banks in the Gulf of Mexico, and the coral reefs around American Samoa. A virtual reality headset isn’t necessary to enjoy the images, but makes the experience all the more true to life.

“We can put a window to the ocean in the palm of someone’s hand and let them explore the underwater world and national marine sanctuaries through that window,” Mitchell Tartt, chief of the NOAA Office of National Marine Sanctuaries’ Conservation Science Division, told The Verge this week of the VR gallery.

This window doesn’t introduce people just to the beauty of underwater environments, but to the tragedies found there too. Climate change, pollution and other human actions are damaging many marine sanctuaries in the U.S., said NOAA — destruction that many Americans will never see firsthand. The virtual gallery is a way for people to better connect with these problems by witnessing the degradation for themselves.

“Sometimes, seeing really is believing,” Chiara Zuccarino-Crowe, tourism and recreation coordinator at NOAA’s Office of National Marine Sanctuaries, told HuffPost in an email Wednesday. “The majority of the public doesn’t have regular opportunities to go scuba diving or snorkeling, so they can’t experience these environments first-hand. The virtual dive galleries let us bring sanctuaries to the public. The thrill of seeing them in a totally new way ― as if you were there underwater ― makes the environmental and resource protection issues more tangible.”

The gallery currently includes images from American Samoa of staghorn corals before, during and after a 2015 bleaching event. Bleaching, caused by warming temperatures and pollution, is devastating reefs worldwide.

People can also explore images of bleached corals in Flower Garden Banks, and invasive species like lionfish, which are wreaking havoc on ecosystems in sanctuaries like the Florida Keys.

“Being in the middle of a coral reef undergoing a bleaching event ― and being able to flash forward a couple months at the click of a button to see the extent of coral death or recovery ― really underscores the urgency in addressing the stressors impacting our marine environment,” Zuccarino-Crowe said.

The virtual gallery is a collaboration between NOAA’s Office of National Marine Sanctuaries and the privately funded XL Catlin Seaview Survey, a global project aimed at documenting the health of the world’s reefs. It has been many years in the making, beginning back in 2014.

Since then, divers have been collecting images from marine sanctuaries across the U.S. using cameras enclosed in waterproof boxes. No extra lighting is used unless the shoot takes place more than 10 feet underwater, Tartt told The Verge. This way, viewers are offered a more authentic experience. 

“Part of what I like about these images is not to post-process them too much,” Tartt said. “Part of the engaging part is to make them look like they would look like if a diver went there.” 

NOAA said it will continue to add virtual dives to the gallery as more images become available. The hope is to eventually have all 13 U.S. marine sanctuaries in the gallery, the agency said.

Virtual dives for Papahānaumokuākea Marine National Monument, Hawaiian Islands Humpback Whale sanctuary and Monterey Bay are among those currently in the works. NOAA said it aims to roll out a new virtual dive location every month. 

Explore the Virtual Dive Gallery for yourself here.

type=type=RelatedArticlesblockTitle=Related Coverage + articlesList=58871616e4b070d8cad5292f,58103c2ae4b001e247df48c8,5660df23e4b08e945feed91a,56a9194de4b0947efb6655b0,57dbfa13e4b053b1ccf2983a

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

After police charged him for assaulting a reporter late Wednesday, Montana Republican House candidate Greg Gianforte is being targeted with last-minute campaign ads that highlight the incident as evidence he is “unfit to serve” and has “no business being in Congress.”

The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) and liberal group MoveOn.org each created ads against Gianforte soon after news of the altercation broke Wednesday evening. The ads, running as voters head to the polls in Thursday’s special election to fill Montana’s lone House seat, feature the direct audio recording of Guardian reporter Ben Jacobs’ violent interaction with Gianforte.

After Jacobs tried to ask him a question about the GOP’s Obamacare repeal bill, Gianforte reportedly “body slammed” Jacobs and broke his glasses. Fox News reporters who witnessed the altercation backed up Jacobs’ account.

On Wednesday night, police charged Gianforte with assault.

“Charged with a crime. No business being in Congress,” says the DCCC ad. The DCCC also demanded that Gianforte “immediately withdraw” from the race.

MoveOn.org’s ad calls Gianforte “unfit to serve.”

Gianforte told Jacobs he was exasperated with reporters’ questions.

“I’m sick and tired of you guys!” he said, according to Jacobs’ audio.

Yet taking questions from reporters is a basic requirement for elected officials.

It is unclear whether the incident will upend the already highly anticipated race between Gianforte and Democrat Rob Quist. Many residents have already cast their votes because Montana has mail-in voting. But the state also has same-day registration, so the assault case could attract to the polls some Montanans who were going to skip voting.

The seat was vacated by Republican Ryan Zinke, who after easily winning re-election last November was picked by President Donald Trump to be the Interior Department secretary. The race to replace him has been closer than expected, with polls showing Quist within single digits of Gianforte despite Montana’s GOP tilt. The race has drawn national attention from both parties, amid Trump’s mounting scandals, GOP unpopularity and a groundswell of Democratic activism.

Watch both ads above.

type=type=RelatedArticlesblockTitle=Related Articles + articlesList=59261430e4b061d8f81f1253,5925e764e4b0265790f4ad60,59264cc5e4b061d8f81f2930,591c710be4b0ed14cddb53fa,591f13bae4b034684b0bee70

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

It’s recently been reported that younger generations of wine drinkers are drawn to bottles with attractive labels. But are the prettiest bottles always the most delicious?

In the spirit of summer, HuffPost conducted a taste test of 12 randomly chosen rosés in an attempt to answer to question, “Am I drinking this rosé just because it has a pretty bottle?”

Our team of editors tested this theory by setting up a taste test for 10 people. First we had the tasters rate 12 different bottles according to their appearance. Then we had the tasters rate each of the 12 rosés based solely on flavor. The trick is, we didn’t tell the tasters which bottle matched up with the wines they sipped.

So do flavor preferences match up with aesthetic preferences? In some cases yes, and in other cases, no. Out of our three best-tasting winners, one wine had a gorgeous bottle and the other two came from some of the ugliest bottles.

Read the results to see which wines’ bottles are fooling you, and which ugly bottles you’re missing out on. They’re ranked by taste, in order from worst to best.

Note: HuffPost is not in any way affiliated with the wines featured in this taste test.

The HuffPost Lifestyle newsletter will make you happier and healthier, one email at a time. Sign up here.

— This feed and its contents are the property of The Huffington Post, and use is subject to our terms. It may be used for personal consumption, but may not be distributed on a website.

Rocket Lab has successfully launched its 56-foot-tall Electron rocket for the first time. The relatively tiny vehicle designed to ferry small payloads to orbit reached outer space around 20 minutes past midnight (Eastern time) on May 25th. Rocket Lab…

Smartphones are an absolute godsend for organizing… well, pretty much everything. Yet despite all they do for us, it can still be hugely frustrating when your various calendar apps don’t play nicely with each other. AOL (Engadget’s parent company,…